long-term monitoring well network work plan

122
SDMS DocID 244269 Center LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN West Kingston/URI Superfund Site South Kingstown, Rhode Island July 2004 WOODARD&CURRAN Engineering Science Operations 41 Hutchins Drive Portland, ME 04102 (207)774-2112 www.woodardcurran.com

Upload: others

Post on 15-Nov-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

SDMS DocID 244269

Center

LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

WOODARDampCURRAN Engineering bull Science bull Operations

41 Hutchins Drive Portland ME 04102

(207)774-2112

wwwwoodardcurrancom

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE NO

1 INTRODUCTION 1-1

11 Project Goals 1-1 12 Understanding of Site Conditions 1-2 121 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 1-2 122 Seismic Results 1-9 123 Groundwater Flow Model 1-9

2 PROJECT PLANNING 2-1

21 Drilling Techniques 2-1 22 Down Hole Geophysical Methods 2-1 23 Monitoring Well Development 2-1 24 In-Situ Hydraulic Conductivity Testing (Rising Head Test) 2-2 25 Groundwater Elevation Measurements 2-2 26 Health amp Safety 2-2 27 Survey 2-3 28 Management of IDW 2-3

3 PROP( DSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK 3-1

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION 4-1

41 Pore Water Sampling 4-1 42 Surface Water and Sediment Sampling 4-1

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS 5-1

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE NO

Table 1-1 Summary of Analysis 1-2

Table 1-2 Summary of GeoProbe Explorations 1-4

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond 1-7

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water 1-8

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment 1-9

West KingstonURI Superfund Site i Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE NO

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater 1-5

Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden VOC Plume 1-6

Figure 1-3 Groundwater Model 1-11

Figure 4-1 Proposed Pore Water Sampling Locations 4-2

APPENDICES

Appendix A Groundwater Surface Water Sediment and Pore Water Results

Appendix B Groundwater Model Report

Appendix C Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan

West KingstonURI Superfund Site ii Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

1 INTRODUCTION

This document presents the proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKUPvI Site) in South Kingstown Rhode Island This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the installation and monitoring of the long-term groundwater monitoring network (see Appendix C Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan)

In addition this Work Plan includes the proposed pore water surface water and sediment investigation to characterize the potential impact to Hundred Acre Pond by site-related contaminants in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Cumin August 2002) approved by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RTDEM) in August 2002 As previously noted by RIDEM the specific list of analytes and sampling frequency mav be modified as new information becomes available during the first several rounds of groundwater sampling The specifics presented in this plan are based on our current understanding of the site conditions

The following sections describe the goals of the LTMN and the current conceptual site understanding that has been used to develop the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the monitoring wells network Section 3 provides a summary of the proposed monitoring well network A separate plan has been developed for the installation of the monitoring well network This work plan titled Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan is provided as Appendix C to the LTMN plan Section 4 is a discussion of our proposed approach for a focused investigation of Hundred Acre Pond

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically the well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with two goals

1 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3 and Appendix C

2 This well network is also designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization of groundwater quality is required in the following site areas

bull Upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull The bedrock aquifer and

bull Hundred Acre Pond and vicinity

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site Section 4 of this Work Plan describes our approach to characterize the nature and distribution of site-related

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

compounds directly to Hundred Acre through a focused pore water surface water and sediment investigation

12 UNDERSTANDING OF SITE CONDITIONS

Woodard amp Curran (WampC) has developed this LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow Table 1-1 provides a summary of analyses already performed by media

Table 1-1 Summary of Analysis JmntMPiiiTriNRmftftfrtfuMii SK^saswampaieaaampMfetiai]

JHBBFwMWrrnHPIP |lj SHsMT3iSl IflPAfeSKilSiS^iSSfl

B^fr ampVriiimamprfiregampamp$KSwSldiJRMpW laquoiis gtbullbullpound mis GP-01 through GP-21 Groundwater 1202 to 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based

Laboratory Metals - RCRA 8

SW-1 through SW-5 Surface Water 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

SD-1 through SD5 Sediments 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

Pest -8081

PCBs - 8082

PW-1 through PW-27 Pore-Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

GP-22 through GP-39 Groundwater 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SD-6 through SD-8 Sediments 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SW-6 and SW-7 Surface Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

RES 892 and RES 902 Groundwater 603 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

RES 870 Groundwater 1003 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

Notes (1) Field analytical work was supplemented with a minimum of 10 split-samples to a fix based laboratory to evaluate field 8260 method results

121 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site has been conducted The findings from these investigations are presented below Comprehensive analytical results are included in Appendix A

Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2002 and May 2003 seventy (70) groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a Geoprobe sampling device and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells were samples for VOCs in June 2003 During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe investigationa site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused Geoprobe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 that included collection and analysis of 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GP-39) A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1 A summary of Geoprobe explorations and refusal depths are provided in Table 1-2

During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe groundwater sampling event TCE was the only VOC detected in exceedence of its 5 ugL Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) TCE was detected at GP-20B (98 bgs) and GP-20A (68 bgs) located downgradient and west of FA4 and the URI pond at concentrations of 8 ugL at each location

As shown on Figure 1-1 the most frequently detected VOCs at the site are PCE and TCE which have been detected in the highest concentrations primarily in samples collected east of the URI pond during the focused May 2003 investigation (ie GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-28 GP-29 GP-32 GP-33 GP-35 GPshy36 GP-37) Detected PCE concentrations in these samples to the east of the URI pond ranged from 21 ugL to 320E ugL at depths ranging from 5 to 31 feet below ground surface (bgs) The highest detected groundwater PCE concentration was reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (320E ugL) located on the eastern side of the URI pond at the toe of the embankment and directly upgradient of pore water sample PW-21 the pore water sample with the highest PCE concentration Detected TCE concentrations in these samples ranged from 18 ugL to 96E ugL The highest detected groundwater TCE concentration was also reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (96 E ugL)

In June 2003 two groundwater samples were collected from the residential bedrock samples located at 892 and 902 Plains Road Samples were analyzed for VOCs Casing lengths for these two bedrock wells are not known but is assumed to be at a minimum the depth to bedrock in this area which was measured during the seismic survey at approximately 140 feet bgs Well 870 was sampled in October of 2003 and was also reported as non-detect for VOCs The casing depth on this well is estimated at approximately 120 feet bgs The other existing bedrock monitoring well at the site GW-01 was installed without a secondary steel casing to a total depth of 25 feet bgs

There were no VOCs reported for the two bedrock wells at 892 and 902 Plains Road

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historic monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 As shown on the figure a narrow overburden PCETCE plume exists at the site which may extend from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond However at this time the outer boundaries of this plume (ie both the inferred upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume) have not been established and represent data gaps in the current site conceptual model As discussed previously in Section 11 additional groundwater data is required to determine the extent of this VOC plume to the east (ie up to the former

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-2 Summary of GeoProbe Explorations

Location Identification

GP-01 GP-02 GP-03 GP-04 GP-06 GP-07 GP-08 GP-08 GP-10 GP-11 GP-13 GP-14 GP-15 GP-17 GP-18 GP-19 GP-20 GP-21 GP-22 GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-26 GP-27 GP-28 GP-29 GP-30 GP-31 GP-32 GP-33 GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

Boring Depth Refusal (ft) below ground surface

68 17 14

105 14 12 68 22 56 34 58 68 66 71 71 26 95 96 12 18 16 16 23 33 16 10 28 35 21 17 20 11 12

115 11 12

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-4 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE TITLE Oe-U^ VQU DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

-bull$$$-$amp-spound^shy bulllt- P^

- tij iijjsr-x- M^ ltamppoundbull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE 110 W bullbull TITLE Merp-Kv DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTONMA

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE NO

1 INTRODUCTION 1-1

11 Project Goals 1-1 12 Understanding of Site Conditions 1-2 121 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 1-2 122 Seismic Results 1-9 123 Groundwater Flow Model 1-9

2 PROJECT PLANNING 2-1

21 Drilling Techniques 2-1 22 Down Hole Geophysical Methods 2-1 23 Monitoring Well Development 2-1 24 In-Situ Hydraulic Conductivity Testing (Rising Head Test) 2-2 25 Groundwater Elevation Measurements 2-2 26 Health amp Safety 2-2 27 Survey 2-3 28 Management of IDW 2-3

3 PROP( DSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK 3-1

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION 4-1

41 Pore Water Sampling 4-1 42 Surface Water and Sediment Sampling 4-1

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS 5-1

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE PAGE NO

Table 1-1 Summary of Analysis 1-2

Table 1-2 Summary of GeoProbe Explorations 1-4

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond 1-7

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water 1-8

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment 1-9

West KingstonURI Superfund Site i Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE NO

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater 1-5

Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden VOC Plume 1-6

Figure 1-3 Groundwater Model 1-11

Figure 4-1 Proposed Pore Water Sampling Locations 4-2

APPENDICES

Appendix A Groundwater Surface Water Sediment and Pore Water Results

Appendix B Groundwater Model Report

Appendix C Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan

West KingstonURI Superfund Site ii Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

1 INTRODUCTION

This document presents the proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKUPvI Site) in South Kingstown Rhode Island This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the installation and monitoring of the long-term groundwater monitoring network (see Appendix C Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan)

In addition this Work Plan includes the proposed pore water surface water and sediment investigation to characterize the potential impact to Hundred Acre Pond by site-related contaminants in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Cumin August 2002) approved by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RTDEM) in August 2002 As previously noted by RIDEM the specific list of analytes and sampling frequency mav be modified as new information becomes available during the first several rounds of groundwater sampling The specifics presented in this plan are based on our current understanding of the site conditions

The following sections describe the goals of the LTMN and the current conceptual site understanding that has been used to develop the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the monitoring wells network Section 3 provides a summary of the proposed monitoring well network A separate plan has been developed for the installation of the monitoring well network This work plan titled Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan is provided as Appendix C to the LTMN plan Section 4 is a discussion of our proposed approach for a focused investigation of Hundred Acre Pond

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically the well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with two goals

1 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3 and Appendix C

2 This well network is also designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization of groundwater quality is required in the following site areas

bull Upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull The bedrock aquifer and

bull Hundred Acre Pond and vicinity

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site Section 4 of this Work Plan describes our approach to characterize the nature and distribution of site-related

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

compounds directly to Hundred Acre through a focused pore water surface water and sediment investigation

12 UNDERSTANDING OF SITE CONDITIONS

Woodard amp Curran (WampC) has developed this LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow Table 1-1 provides a summary of analyses already performed by media

Table 1-1 Summary of Analysis JmntMPiiiTriNRmftftfrtfuMii SK^saswampaieaaampMfetiai]

JHBBFwMWrrnHPIP |lj SHsMT3iSl IflPAfeSKilSiS^iSSfl

B^fr ampVriiimamprfiregampamp$KSwSldiJRMpW laquoiis gtbullbullpound mis GP-01 through GP-21 Groundwater 1202 to 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based

Laboratory Metals - RCRA 8

SW-1 through SW-5 Surface Water 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

SD-1 through SD5 Sediments 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

Pest -8081

PCBs - 8082

PW-1 through PW-27 Pore-Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

GP-22 through GP-39 Groundwater 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SD-6 through SD-8 Sediments 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SW-6 and SW-7 Surface Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

RES 892 and RES 902 Groundwater 603 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

RES 870 Groundwater 1003 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

Notes (1) Field analytical work was supplemented with a minimum of 10 split-samples to a fix based laboratory to evaluate field 8260 method results

121 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site has been conducted The findings from these investigations are presented below Comprehensive analytical results are included in Appendix A

Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2002 and May 2003 seventy (70) groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a Geoprobe sampling device and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells were samples for VOCs in June 2003 During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe investigationa site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused Geoprobe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 that included collection and analysis of 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GP-39) A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1 A summary of Geoprobe explorations and refusal depths are provided in Table 1-2

During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe groundwater sampling event TCE was the only VOC detected in exceedence of its 5 ugL Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) TCE was detected at GP-20B (98 bgs) and GP-20A (68 bgs) located downgradient and west of FA4 and the URI pond at concentrations of 8 ugL at each location

As shown on Figure 1-1 the most frequently detected VOCs at the site are PCE and TCE which have been detected in the highest concentrations primarily in samples collected east of the URI pond during the focused May 2003 investigation (ie GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-28 GP-29 GP-32 GP-33 GP-35 GPshy36 GP-37) Detected PCE concentrations in these samples to the east of the URI pond ranged from 21 ugL to 320E ugL at depths ranging from 5 to 31 feet below ground surface (bgs) The highest detected groundwater PCE concentration was reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (320E ugL) located on the eastern side of the URI pond at the toe of the embankment and directly upgradient of pore water sample PW-21 the pore water sample with the highest PCE concentration Detected TCE concentrations in these samples ranged from 18 ugL to 96E ugL The highest detected groundwater TCE concentration was also reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (96 E ugL)

In June 2003 two groundwater samples were collected from the residential bedrock samples located at 892 and 902 Plains Road Samples were analyzed for VOCs Casing lengths for these two bedrock wells are not known but is assumed to be at a minimum the depth to bedrock in this area which was measured during the seismic survey at approximately 140 feet bgs Well 870 was sampled in October of 2003 and was also reported as non-detect for VOCs The casing depth on this well is estimated at approximately 120 feet bgs The other existing bedrock monitoring well at the site GW-01 was installed without a secondary steel casing to a total depth of 25 feet bgs

There were no VOCs reported for the two bedrock wells at 892 and 902 Plains Road

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historic monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 As shown on the figure a narrow overburden PCETCE plume exists at the site which may extend from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond However at this time the outer boundaries of this plume (ie both the inferred upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume) have not been established and represent data gaps in the current site conceptual model As discussed previously in Section 11 additional groundwater data is required to determine the extent of this VOC plume to the east (ie up to the former

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-2 Summary of GeoProbe Explorations

Location Identification

GP-01 GP-02 GP-03 GP-04 GP-06 GP-07 GP-08 GP-08 GP-10 GP-11 GP-13 GP-14 GP-15 GP-17 GP-18 GP-19 GP-20 GP-21 GP-22 GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-26 GP-27 GP-28 GP-29 GP-30 GP-31 GP-32 GP-33 GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

Boring Depth Refusal (ft) below ground surface

68 17 14

105 14 12 68 22 56 34 58 68 66 71 71 26 95 96 12 18 16 16 23 33 16 10 28 35 21 17 20 11 12

115 11 12

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-4 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE TITLE Oe-U^ VQU DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

-bull$$$-$amp-spound^shy bulllt- P^

- tij iijjsr-x- M^ ltamppoundbull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE 110 W bullbull TITLE Merp-Kv DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTONMA

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE PAGE NO

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater 1-5

Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden VOC Plume 1-6

Figure 1-3 Groundwater Model 1-11

Figure 4-1 Proposed Pore Water Sampling Locations 4-2

APPENDICES

Appendix A Groundwater Surface Water Sediment and Pore Water Results

Appendix B Groundwater Model Report

Appendix C Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan

West KingstonURI Superfund Site ii Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

1 INTRODUCTION

This document presents the proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKUPvI Site) in South Kingstown Rhode Island This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the installation and monitoring of the long-term groundwater monitoring network (see Appendix C Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan)

In addition this Work Plan includes the proposed pore water surface water and sediment investigation to characterize the potential impact to Hundred Acre Pond by site-related contaminants in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Cumin August 2002) approved by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RTDEM) in August 2002 As previously noted by RIDEM the specific list of analytes and sampling frequency mav be modified as new information becomes available during the first several rounds of groundwater sampling The specifics presented in this plan are based on our current understanding of the site conditions

The following sections describe the goals of the LTMN and the current conceptual site understanding that has been used to develop the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the monitoring wells network Section 3 provides a summary of the proposed monitoring well network A separate plan has been developed for the installation of the monitoring well network This work plan titled Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan is provided as Appendix C to the LTMN plan Section 4 is a discussion of our proposed approach for a focused investigation of Hundred Acre Pond

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically the well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with two goals

1 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3 and Appendix C

2 This well network is also designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization of groundwater quality is required in the following site areas

bull Upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull The bedrock aquifer and

bull Hundred Acre Pond and vicinity

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site Section 4 of this Work Plan describes our approach to characterize the nature and distribution of site-related

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

compounds directly to Hundred Acre through a focused pore water surface water and sediment investigation

12 UNDERSTANDING OF SITE CONDITIONS

Woodard amp Curran (WampC) has developed this LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow Table 1-1 provides a summary of analyses already performed by media

Table 1-1 Summary of Analysis JmntMPiiiTriNRmftftfrtfuMii SK^saswampaieaaampMfetiai]

JHBBFwMWrrnHPIP |lj SHsMT3iSl IflPAfeSKilSiS^iSSfl

B^fr ampVriiimamprfiregampamp$KSwSldiJRMpW laquoiis gtbullbullpound mis GP-01 through GP-21 Groundwater 1202 to 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based

Laboratory Metals - RCRA 8

SW-1 through SW-5 Surface Water 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

SD-1 through SD5 Sediments 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

Pest -8081

PCBs - 8082

PW-1 through PW-27 Pore-Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

GP-22 through GP-39 Groundwater 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SD-6 through SD-8 Sediments 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SW-6 and SW-7 Surface Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

RES 892 and RES 902 Groundwater 603 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

RES 870 Groundwater 1003 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

Notes (1) Field analytical work was supplemented with a minimum of 10 split-samples to a fix based laboratory to evaluate field 8260 method results

121 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site has been conducted The findings from these investigations are presented below Comprehensive analytical results are included in Appendix A

Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2002 and May 2003 seventy (70) groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a Geoprobe sampling device and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells were samples for VOCs in June 2003 During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe investigationa site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused Geoprobe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 that included collection and analysis of 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GP-39) A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1 A summary of Geoprobe explorations and refusal depths are provided in Table 1-2

During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe groundwater sampling event TCE was the only VOC detected in exceedence of its 5 ugL Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) TCE was detected at GP-20B (98 bgs) and GP-20A (68 bgs) located downgradient and west of FA4 and the URI pond at concentrations of 8 ugL at each location

As shown on Figure 1-1 the most frequently detected VOCs at the site are PCE and TCE which have been detected in the highest concentrations primarily in samples collected east of the URI pond during the focused May 2003 investigation (ie GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-28 GP-29 GP-32 GP-33 GP-35 GPshy36 GP-37) Detected PCE concentrations in these samples to the east of the URI pond ranged from 21 ugL to 320E ugL at depths ranging from 5 to 31 feet below ground surface (bgs) The highest detected groundwater PCE concentration was reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (320E ugL) located on the eastern side of the URI pond at the toe of the embankment and directly upgradient of pore water sample PW-21 the pore water sample with the highest PCE concentration Detected TCE concentrations in these samples ranged from 18 ugL to 96E ugL The highest detected groundwater TCE concentration was also reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (96 E ugL)

In June 2003 two groundwater samples were collected from the residential bedrock samples located at 892 and 902 Plains Road Samples were analyzed for VOCs Casing lengths for these two bedrock wells are not known but is assumed to be at a minimum the depth to bedrock in this area which was measured during the seismic survey at approximately 140 feet bgs Well 870 was sampled in October of 2003 and was also reported as non-detect for VOCs The casing depth on this well is estimated at approximately 120 feet bgs The other existing bedrock monitoring well at the site GW-01 was installed without a secondary steel casing to a total depth of 25 feet bgs

There were no VOCs reported for the two bedrock wells at 892 and 902 Plains Road

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historic monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 As shown on the figure a narrow overburden PCETCE plume exists at the site which may extend from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond However at this time the outer boundaries of this plume (ie both the inferred upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume) have not been established and represent data gaps in the current site conceptual model As discussed previously in Section 11 additional groundwater data is required to determine the extent of this VOC plume to the east (ie up to the former

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-2 Summary of GeoProbe Explorations

Location Identification

GP-01 GP-02 GP-03 GP-04 GP-06 GP-07 GP-08 GP-08 GP-10 GP-11 GP-13 GP-14 GP-15 GP-17 GP-18 GP-19 GP-20 GP-21 GP-22 GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-26 GP-27 GP-28 GP-29 GP-30 GP-31 GP-32 GP-33 GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

Boring Depth Refusal (ft) below ground surface

68 17 14

105 14 12 68 22 56 34 58 68 66 71 71 26 95 96 12 18 16 16 23 33 16 10 28 35 21 17 20 11 12

115 11 12

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-4 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE TITLE Oe-U^ VQU DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

-bull$$$-$amp-spound^shy bulllt- P^

- tij iijjsr-x- M^ ltamppoundbull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE 110 W bullbull TITLE Merp-Kv DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTONMA

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo

1 INTRODUCTION

This document presents the proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKUPvI Site) in South Kingstown Rhode Island This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the installation and monitoring of the long-term groundwater monitoring network (see Appendix C Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan)

In addition this Work Plan includes the proposed pore water surface water and sediment investigation to characterize the potential impact to Hundred Acre Pond by site-related contaminants in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Cumin August 2002) approved by the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RTDEM) in August 2002 As previously noted by RIDEM the specific list of analytes and sampling frequency mav be modified as new information becomes available during the first several rounds of groundwater sampling The specifics presented in this plan are based on our current understanding of the site conditions

The following sections describe the goals of the LTMN and the current conceptual site understanding that has been used to develop the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the monitoring wells network Section 3 provides a summary of the proposed monitoring well network A separate plan has been developed for the installation of the monitoring well network This work plan titled Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan is provided as Appendix C to the LTMN plan Section 4 is a discussion of our proposed approach for a focused investigation of Hundred Acre Pond

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically the well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with two goals

1 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3 and Appendix C

2 This well network is also designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization of groundwater quality is required in the following site areas

bull Upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull The bedrock aquifer and

bull Hundred Acre Pond and vicinity

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site Section 4 of this Work Plan describes our approach to characterize the nature and distribution of site-related

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

compounds directly to Hundred Acre through a focused pore water surface water and sediment investigation

12 UNDERSTANDING OF SITE CONDITIONS

Woodard amp Curran (WampC) has developed this LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow Table 1-1 provides a summary of analyses already performed by media

Table 1-1 Summary of Analysis JmntMPiiiTriNRmftftfrtfuMii SK^saswampaieaaampMfetiai]

JHBBFwMWrrnHPIP |lj SHsMT3iSl IflPAfeSKilSiS^iSSfl

B^fr ampVriiimamprfiregampamp$KSwSldiJRMpW laquoiis gtbullbullpound mis GP-01 through GP-21 Groundwater 1202 to 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based

Laboratory Metals - RCRA 8

SW-1 through SW-5 Surface Water 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

SD-1 through SD5 Sediments 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

Pest -8081

PCBs - 8082

PW-1 through PW-27 Pore-Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

GP-22 through GP-39 Groundwater 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SD-6 through SD-8 Sediments 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SW-6 and SW-7 Surface Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

RES 892 and RES 902 Groundwater 603 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

RES 870 Groundwater 1003 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

Notes (1) Field analytical work was supplemented with a minimum of 10 split-samples to a fix based laboratory to evaluate field 8260 method results

121 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site has been conducted The findings from these investigations are presented below Comprehensive analytical results are included in Appendix A

Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2002 and May 2003 seventy (70) groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a Geoprobe sampling device and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells were samples for VOCs in June 2003 During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe investigationa site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused Geoprobe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 that included collection and analysis of 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GP-39) A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1 A summary of Geoprobe explorations and refusal depths are provided in Table 1-2

During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe groundwater sampling event TCE was the only VOC detected in exceedence of its 5 ugL Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) TCE was detected at GP-20B (98 bgs) and GP-20A (68 bgs) located downgradient and west of FA4 and the URI pond at concentrations of 8 ugL at each location

As shown on Figure 1-1 the most frequently detected VOCs at the site are PCE and TCE which have been detected in the highest concentrations primarily in samples collected east of the URI pond during the focused May 2003 investigation (ie GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-28 GP-29 GP-32 GP-33 GP-35 GPshy36 GP-37) Detected PCE concentrations in these samples to the east of the URI pond ranged from 21 ugL to 320E ugL at depths ranging from 5 to 31 feet below ground surface (bgs) The highest detected groundwater PCE concentration was reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (320E ugL) located on the eastern side of the URI pond at the toe of the embankment and directly upgradient of pore water sample PW-21 the pore water sample with the highest PCE concentration Detected TCE concentrations in these samples ranged from 18 ugL to 96E ugL The highest detected groundwater TCE concentration was also reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (96 E ugL)

In June 2003 two groundwater samples were collected from the residential bedrock samples located at 892 and 902 Plains Road Samples were analyzed for VOCs Casing lengths for these two bedrock wells are not known but is assumed to be at a minimum the depth to bedrock in this area which was measured during the seismic survey at approximately 140 feet bgs Well 870 was sampled in October of 2003 and was also reported as non-detect for VOCs The casing depth on this well is estimated at approximately 120 feet bgs The other existing bedrock monitoring well at the site GW-01 was installed without a secondary steel casing to a total depth of 25 feet bgs

There were no VOCs reported for the two bedrock wells at 892 and 902 Plains Road

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historic monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 As shown on the figure a narrow overburden PCETCE plume exists at the site which may extend from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond However at this time the outer boundaries of this plume (ie both the inferred upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume) have not been established and represent data gaps in the current site conceptual model As discussed previously in Section 11 additional groundwater data is required to determine the extent of this VOC plume to the east (ie up to the former

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-2 Summary of GeoProbe Explorations

Location Identification

GP-01 GP-02 GP-03 GP-04 GP-06 GP-07 GP-08 GP-08 GP-10 GP-11 GP-13 GP-14 GP-15 GP-17 GP-18 GP-19 GP-20 GP-21 GP-22 GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-26 GP-27 GP-28 GP-29 GP-30 GP-31 GP-32 GP-33 GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

Boring Depth Refusal (ft) below ground surface

68 17 14

105 14 12 68 22 56 34 58 68 66 71 71 26 95 96 12 18 16 16 23 33 16 10 28 35 21 17 20 11 12

115 11 12

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-4 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE TITLE Oe-U^ VQU DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

-bull$$$-$amp-spound^shy bulllt- P^

- tij iijjsr-x- M^ ltamppoundbull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE 110 W bullbull TITLE Merp-Kv DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTONMA

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo

compounds directly to Hundred Acre through a focused pore water surface water and sediment investigation

12 UNDERSTANDING OF SITE CONDITIONS

Woodard amp Curran (WampC) has developed this LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow Table 1-1 provides a summary of analyses already performed by media

Table 1-1 Summary of Analysis JmntMPiiiTriNRmftftfrtfuMii SK^saswampaieaaampMfetiai]

JHBBFwMWrrnHPIP |lj SHsMT3iSl IflPAfeSKilSiS^iSSfl

B^fr ampVriiimamprfiregampamp$KSwSldiJRMpW laquoiis gtbullbullpound mis GP-01 through GP-21 Groundwater 1202 to 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based

Laboratory Metals - RCRA 8

SW-1 through SW-5 Surface Water 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

SD-1 through SD5 Sediments 103 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

SVOC - 8270

Metals - TAL

Pest -8081

PCBs - 8082

PW-1 through PW-27 Pore-Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

GP-22 through GP-39 Groundwater 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SD-6 through SD-8 Sediments 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

SW-6 and SW-7 Surface Water 503 VOC - Modified Field Laboratory (1) 8260

RES 892 and RES 902 Groundwater 603 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

RES 870 Groundwater 1003 VOC - 8260 Fix Based Laboratory

Notes (1) Field analytical work was supplemented with a minimum of 10 split-samples to a fix based laboratory to evaluate field 8260 method results

121 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site has been conducted The findings from these investigations are presented below Comprehensive analytical results are included in Appendix A

Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2002 and May 2003 seventy (70) groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a Geoprobe sampling device and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells were samples for VOCs in June 2003 During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe investigationa site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused Geoprobe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 that included collection and analysis of 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GP-39) A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1 A summary of Geoprobe explorations and refusal depths are provided in Table 1-2

During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe groundwater sampling event TCE was the only VOC detected in exceedence of its 5 ugL Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) TCE was detected at GP-20B (98 bgs) and GP-20A (68 bgs) located downgradient and west of FA4 and the URI pond at concentrations of 8 ugL at each location

As shown on Figure 1-1 the most frequently detected VOCs at the site are PCE and TCE which have been detected in the highest concentrations primarily in samples collected east of the URI pond during the focused May 2003 investigation (ie GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-28 GP-29 GP-32 GP-33 GP-35 GPshy36 GP-37) Detected PCE concentrations in these samples to the east of the URI pond ranged from 21 ugL to 320E ugL at depths ranging from 5 to 31 feet below ground surface (bgs) The highest detected groundwater PCE concentration was reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (320E ugL) located on the eastern side of the URI pond at the toe of the embankment and directly upgradient of pore water sample PW-21 the pore water sample with the highest PCE concentration Detected TCE concentrations in these samples ranged from 18 ugL to 96E ugL The highest detected groundwater TCE concentration was also reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (96 E ugL)

In June 2003 two groundwater samples were collected from the residential bedrock samples located at 892 and 902 Plains Road Samples were analyzed for VOCs Casing lengths for these two bedrock wells are not known but is assumed to be at a minimum the depth to bedrock in this area which was measured during the seismic survey at approximately 140 feet bgs Well 870 was sampled in October of 2003 and was also reported as non-detect for VOCs The casing depth on this well is estimated at approximately 120 feet bgs The other existing bedrock monitoring well at the site GW-01 was installed without a secondary steel casing to a total depth of 25 feet bgs

There were no VOCs reported for the two bedrock wells at 892 and 902 Plains Road

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historic monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 As shown on the figure a narrow overburden PCETCE plume exists at the site which may extend from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond However at this time the outer boundaries of this plume (ie both the inferred upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume) have not been established and represent data gaps in the current site conceptual model As discussed previously in Section 11 additional groundwater data is required to determine the extent of this VOC plume to the east (ie up to the former

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-2 Summary of GeoProbe Explorations

Location Identification

GP-01 GP-02 GP-03 GP-04 GP-06 GP-07 GP-08 GP-08 GP-10 GP-11 GP-13 GP-14 GP-15 GP-17 GP-18 GP-19 GP-20 GP-21 GP-22 GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-26 GP-27 GP-28 GP-29 GP-30 GP-31 GP-32 GP-33 GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

Boring Depth Refusal (ft) below ground surface

68 17 14

105 14 12 68 22 56 34 58 68 66 71 71 26 95 96 12 18 16 16 23 33 16 10 28 35 21 17 20 11 12

115 11 12

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-4 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE TITLE Oe-U^ VQU DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

-bull$$$-$amp-spound^shy bulllt- P^

- tij iijjsr-x- M^ ltamppoundbull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE 110 W bullbull TITLE Merp-Kv DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTONMA

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo

groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site has been conducted The findings from these investigations are presented below Comprehensive analytical results are included in Appendix A

Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2002 and May 2003 seventy (70) groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a Geoprobe sampling device and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells were samples for VOCs in June 2003 During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe investigationa site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused Geoprobe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 that included collection and analysis of 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GP-39) A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1 A summary of Geoprobe explorations and refusal depths are provided in Table 1-2

During the December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe groundwater sampling event TCE was the only VOC detected in exceedence of its 5 ugL Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) TCE was detected at GP-20B (98 bgs) and GP-20A (68 bgs) located downgradient and west of FA4 and the URI pond at concentrations of 8 ugL at each location

As shown on Figure 1-1 the most frequently detected VOCs at the site are PCE and TCE which have been detected in the highest concentrations primarily in samples collected east of the URI pond during the focused May 2003 investigation (ie GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-28 GP-29 GP-32 GP-33 GP-35 GPshy36 GP-37) Detected PCE concentrations in these samples to the east of the URI pond ranged from 21 ugL to 320E ugL at depths ranging from 5 to 31 feet below ground surface (bgs) The highest detected groundwater PCE concentration was reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (320E ugL) located on the eastern side of the URI pond at the toe of the embankment and directly upgradient of pore water sample PW-21 the pore water sample with the highest PCE concentration Detected TCE concentrations in these samples ranged from 18 ugL to 96E ugL The highest detected groundwater TCE concentration was also reported from 14 feet below the ground surface at GP-28 (96 E ugL)

In June 2003 two groundwater samples were collected from the residential bedrock samples located at 892 and 902 Plains Road Samples were analyzed for VOCs Casing lengths for these two bedrock wells are not known but is assumed to be at a minimum the depth to bedrock in this area which was measured during the seismic survey at approximately 140 feet bgs Well 870 was sampled in October of 2003 and was also reported as non-detect for VOCs The casing depth on this well is estimated at approximately 120 feet bgs The other existing bedrock monitoring well at the site GW-01 was installed without a secondary steel casing to a total depth of 25 feet bgs

There were no VOCs reported for the two bedrock wells at 892 and 902 Plains Road

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historic monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 As shown on the figure a narrow overburden PCETCE plume exists at the site which may extend from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond However at this time the outer boundaries of this plume (ie both the inferred upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume) have not been established and represent data gaps in the current site conceptual model As discussed previously in Section 11 additional groundwater data is required to determine the extent of this VOC plume to the east (ie up to the former

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-2 Summary of GeoProbe Explorations

Location Identification

GP-01 GP-02 GP-03 GP-04 GP-06 GP-07 GP-08 GP-08 GP-10 GP-11 GP-13 GP-14 GP-15 GP-17 GP-18 GP-19 GP-20 GP-21 GP-22 GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-26 GP-27 GP-28 GP-29 GP-30 GP-31 GP-32 GP-33 GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

Boring Depth Refusal (ft) below ground surface

68 17 14

105 14 12 68 22 56 34 58 68 66 71 71 26 95 96 12 18 16 16 23 33 16 10 28 35 21 17 20 11 12

115 11 12

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-4 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE TITLE Oe-U^ VQU DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

-bull$$$-$amp-spound^shy bulllt- P^

- tij iijjsr-x- M^ ltamppoundbull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE 110 W bullbull TITLE Merp-Kv DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTONMA

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo

Table 1-2 Summary of GeoProbe Explorations

Location Identification

GP-01 GP-02 GP-03 GP-04 GP-06 GP-07 GP-08 GP-08 GP-10 GP-11 GP-13 GP-14 GP-15 GP-17 GP-18 GP-19 GP-20 GP-21 GP-22 GP-23 GP-24 GP-25 GP-26 GP-27 GP-28 GP-29 GP-30 GP-31 GP-32 GP-33 GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

Boring Depth Refusal (ft) below ground surface

68 17 14

105 14 12 68 22 56 34 58 68 66 71 71 26 95 96 12 18 16 16 23 33 16 10 28 35 21 17 20 11 12

115 11 12

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-4 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE TITLE Oe-U^ VQU DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

-bull$$$-$amp-spound^shy bulllt- P^

- tij iijjsr-x- M^ ltamppoundbull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE 110 W bullbull TITLE Merp-Kv DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTONMA

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE TITLE Oe-U^ VQU DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

-bull$$$-$amp-spound^shy bulllt- P^

- tij iijjsr-x- M^ ltamppoundbull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE 110 W bullbull TITLE Merp-Kv DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTONMA

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

QOTHER

DATE 110 W bullbull TITLE Merp-Kv DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTONMA

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo

drum disposal area) and west (ie Hundred Acre Pond) of the site and to evaluate if a VOC plume exists in the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of the URI pond However the VOC data collected to date indicates that Landfill Areas FA2 FA3 and FAS are not significantly contributing to the VOCs in groundwater beneath the site

Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigated whether elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 were a reflection of groundwater flow to the pond and were used to direct a Geoprobe groundwater investigation in the vicinity of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE and TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-l)CE (see Table 1-3) Detected concentrations of PCE in pore water ranged from 7 ugL to 360E ugL in exceedence of the USEPA Maximum Contaminants Level (MCL) of 5 ugL The highest concentration of PCE were detected at PW-20 (200E ugL) PW-21 (360E ugL) and PW-23 (220 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond Detected concentrations of TCE in pore water ranged from 55 ugL to 56E ugL in exceedence of the MCL of 5 ugL for this compound The highest concentration of TCE were also detected at PW-20 (36 ugL) PW-21 (56E ugL) and PW-23 (35 ugL) located on the eastern edge of the pond The results of the pore water sampling indicate that the URI pond is being impacted by PCE and TCE from upgradient groundwater This data also clearly indicates that there is not a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) source in the pond itself or in the direct vicinity of the pond

Table 1-3 Detected VOCs in Pore Water from URI Pond

Sample ID

PW-1

PW-2 PW-3

PW-4

PW-5

PW-6

PW-7

PW-8

PW-9

PW-10

PW-11

PW-13

PW-14

PW-15

PW-16

PW-17

PW-18

PW-19

PW-20

Date Collected

5703

5803 5803

5603

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5703

5803

5803

5803

5703

5603

5603

5603

5703

Tetrachloroethene

11 ND 13

ND

7

71 86

23 ND ND

82 ND

ND

17 ND

19

30

23

200 E

Trichloroethene

ND

ND ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

11

87

17 36

1 2-DichIoroethane

neL ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

55 ND

72

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND

83 ND

ND

ND

ND ND

54 ND ND

ND

ND ND

ND

ND

ND

12

35 15

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-l2-Dichloroethene Sample ID Collected HSL

PW-21 5703 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 5703 140 31 64 21 PW-23 5703 220 35 77 79 PW-24 5603 22 ND ND 12

PW-25 5803 ND ND ND ND PW-25

Duplicate 5803 ND ND ND ND

PW-26 5803 20 55 ND ND

PW-27 5803 ND ND ND ND ND = not detected above the laboratory reporting limit E = Estimated value exceeds calibration limit of analytical instrument

Surface Water

Seven (7) surface water samples have been collected at the site in both January 2003 and May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 Of these VOCs have been detected in the three surface water samples (SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07) collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 Detected VOCs included PCE TCE and trichlorofluoromethane (see Table 1-4) PCE has been detected in SW-01 SW-06 and SW-07 at concentrations of 20 ugL 14 ugL and 14 ugL respectively TCE was detected at SW-01 at 6 ugL Trichlorofluoromethane was detected at SW-01 at 1J ugL No VOCs have been detected in surface water samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

Table 1-4 Detected VOCs in Surface Water

Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

Sample ID Date Collected UgL

SW-01 1803 20 6 1J SW-02 1803 ND ND ND SW-03 1803 ND ND ND SW-04 1803 ND ND ND SW-05 1803 ND ND ND SW-06 5703 14 ND ND SW-07 5703 14 ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value reported below the PQL

Sediment

Eight (8) sediment samples have been collected at the site in either January 2003 or May 2003 as shown on Figure 1-1 The results of this sampling indicate that sediments in the URI pond located to the east of FA4 have detectable concentrations of site-related VOCs Volatile organic compounds have been detected in two sediment samples (SD-01 and SD-07) collected from the URI pond and include PCE TCE and cis-l2-DCE (see Table 1-5) At SD-01 PCE and TCE were detected at concentrations of 538 ugkg (748 ugkg in the duplicate) and 136J ugkg (186 ugkg in the duplicate) respectively At SD-07 TCE and cis-l2-DCE were detected at 32 ugkg and 105 (igkg respectively No VOCs have been detected in sediment samples collected from other on-site surface water bodies

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-8 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Table 1-5 Detected VOCs in Sediment

Sample ID Date Collected Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene cis-l2-Dichloroethene Hgkg

SD-1 1803 573 136 J ND SD-1 duplicate 1803 748 186 ND

SD-2 1803 ND ND ND SD-3 1803 ND ND ND SD-4 1803 ND ND ND SD-5 1803 ND ND ND SD-6 5803 ND ND ND SD-7 5803 ND 32 105 SD-8 5803 ND ND ND

ND = Not detected above the laboratory reporting limit J = Estimated value

122 Seismic Results

Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results and the findings of the seismic refraction survey completed by Northeast Geophysical Services (NGS) in MarchApril 2003 The seismic report from NGS including cross-sectional views of the site geology

The depth to bedrock varies sharply across the site ranging from 10 to 30 feet below ground surface (bgs) from the easternmost edge of the site (ie former Drum Storage Area and gravel bank) to the center of the site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RJDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than 8 feet) in the vicinity of the former drum storage area (see Figure 3-2)

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) develop the locations and depths of the proposed overburden monitoring wells and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock and were used to locate proposed bedrock monitoring well locations

123 Groundwater Flow Model

Figure 1-3 depicts the flow direction of groundwater from the former drum storage area in the simulated groundwater flow system at the URI Site This flow simulation was completed in a MODFLOW three-dimensional finite difference groundwater model completed by Woodard amp Curran (USGS McDonald and Harbaugh 1988) A more detailed description of the groundwater modeling effort for this entire site is provided in Appendix B In order to depict groundwater flow directions MODPATH a finite difference particle tracking software using MODFLOW was used

The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals on Figure 1-3 The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-9 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

the direction of groundwater movement from the former drum storage area Particles were placed in the till located above bedrock on the highlands east of the site in the vicinity of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of contaminant flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill (ie former drum storage area) towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site This pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west Groundwater flow is in a deeper unconsolidated till and lower down valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly apparently due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 1-10 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Former Drum Disposal

Figure 1-3 Preliminary Groundwater Model

I Ongnials tn color Monitoring Well Work Plan West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRANshy

205 540wipfiguresgwmodel cnv

2 PROJECT PLANNING

This section describes specific details concerning the installation and testing methods for the LTMN Included are the drilling method monitoring well construction details and aquifer testing methods Also discussed are field work-related activities that include health and safety issues and the handling of investigation derived waste (IDW) The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island Health amp Safety Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island both dated August 2002 and the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan dated July 2004 (see Appendix C)

21 DRILLING TECHNIQUES

The drilling techniques for the overburden and bedrock wells are described in Appendix C

22 DOWN HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

The geophysical methods are described in Appendix C

23 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT

Monitoring wells will be developed to remove fine material which may be present in the vicinity of the well screen Monitoring wells will be developed using a surge block or over pumping to agitate the sand pack and draw loose formation material into the well screen A pump may be placed in the well to remove fine sediment that has been collected or the well may be bailed Pumping and surging actions will be alternated as appropriate until the groundwater removed from the well is visually free of fine sand and silt Development water from monitoring wells will be containerized for testing and disposal

The following general procedures will be used for monitoring well development

1 Decontaminate all pumping and tubing equipment prior to use in each monitoring well

2 Attach a surge block if used to an appropriate length of rods so the surge block extends down into the well screen

3 Rapidly raise and lower (surge) the block over the entire length of the well screen to loosen fine material from the sand pack and help establish the sand pack as a filter mechanism

4 After several minutes of surging remove well water Continue pumping or bailing for several minutes or until the water appears sediment-free

5 Continue the cycle of surging andor pumping until the water appears sediment-free with minimal well water removal after surging

6 Monitoring well development will not be conducted until 24-hours after installation During development pH temperature and specific conductivity will be measured as an indication of stabilization

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

7 Turbidity will be measured during this process as an indication of the development progress The goal will be 5 NTUs However after a reasonable effort (1 hour) is made to meet this goal and no significant progress is made toward the 5 NTU goal the development process will be discontinued

8 A filtered and an unfiltered groundwater sample may be collected if 5 NTUs is not met during subsequent groundwater sampling events

9 Record development activities and observations in the field log book

24 IN-SITU HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTING (RISING HEAD TEST)

Woodard amp Curran will use flow and recharge measurements collected during low flow sampling events of the wells to measure discharge and drawdown over time to calculate the hydraulic conductivity The hydraulic conductivity for each well will be estimated using either the Hvorslev (1954) or the Bower-Rice (1976) method depending on the distribution of the data The standard operating procedure for the rising head tests was included in the Final Quality Assurance Project Plan (Including the Sampling and Analysis Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpURIDisposal Area Site dated August 2002

25 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS

Groundwater elevation measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator which identifies the water level using an electronic current The following general procedures will be followed to collect water levels

1 Remove the cap from the top of the PVC riser

2 The highest point of the PVC rim will be permanently marked as a reference point

3 Place a decontaminated electronic water level sensor down the well

4 Listen for the audible signal indicating the sensor has reached the water level inside the well

5 Fine-tune the depth at which the sensor first rings by slowly raising and lowering the sensor until an accurate depth to water is found This will be measured and recorded to the nearest 001 foot

6 On the graduated cable attaching the sensor to the reel record the depth of the water from the highest point of the PVC rim

7 Record the time date and water level depth data in the field log book

The water elevation data will be used to interpret groundwater flow directions Measurements will be obtained periodically during the field program and during subsequent groundwater sampling events as required in the SOW

26 HEALTH amp SAFETY

The field work associated with this work plan will be conducted in accordance with the site-specific Health amp Safety Plan (HASP) for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island dated August 2002 All work will be performed at Level D personal protection equipment as described in the HASP The HASP describes the necessary

West KtngstonURI Superfund Site 2-2 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

precautions to be taken to monitor the breathing zone and protect workers from potential dermal exposures

27 SURVEY

Monitoring well elevations and coordinates will be surveyed The well locations will be measured to the nearest meter and reported using the State Plane Coordinate System The elevations of the newly installed monitoring wells will be established using differential survey leveling techniques with an accuracy of+-001 feet

28 MANAGEMENT OF IDW

The management of investigation derived waste (IDW) is described in Appendix C

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 2-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

3 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and one off-site residential wells (R -870) and together these will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site The details describing the function and installation of these wells is provided in the Vertical Profiling amp Monitoring Well Installation Plan (see Appendix C)

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 3-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

4 PROPOSED HUNDRED ACRE POND INVESTIGATION

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (WampC August 2002) WampC is proposing a focused investigation at Hundred Acre Pond The investigation will consist of pore water surface water and sediment sampling The purpose of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be to fill a data gap described in Section 1 regarding potential discharge of the PCETCE plume to Hundred Acre Pond The results of the Hundred Acre Pond investigation will be used to define the limits of a PCETCE plume and evaluate the potential risks to human health and ecological receptors The number and locations of samples to be collected at Hundred Acre Pond are based on previous investigations and the groundwater model The proposed approach is described below

41 PORE WATER SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 4-1 seventeen (17) pore water samples are proposed for Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater model used particle tracking to predict the fate and transport from the Former Drum Disposal Area to Hundred Acre Pond The pore water sampling locations at Hundred Acre Pond were then determined using these groundwater model predictions (see Appendix C) Pore water samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B

Pore water samples will be collected using the same method used successfully in May 2003 at the URI pond (see subsection 6132 and Appendix A SOP S-16 of the QAPP) In accordance with the pore water sampling SOP pore water samples will be collected using a sampling device placed in the top 1 foot of sediment (see Figure 1 of the pore water sampling SOP S-16) with a screened interval placed at 6 to 12 inches below the sediment surface Pore water will be pumped from sediment at a low-flow rate of 100 mLmin to obtain representative field parameters After representative field parameters for pore water have been obtained a pore water sample will be collected If surface water interference are observed the pore water sampling device will be re-positioned (ie driven deeper) in the sediment and a second attempt to collect a pore water sample will be made However after the two attempts the location with either be abandoned or a sample will be collected and any exceptions will be noted in the logbook for consideration during data evaluation

42 SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING

As shown on Figure 3-1 one surface water and one sediment sample will be collected from Hundred Acre Pond Surface water and sediment samples will be collected in accordance with SOP-10 and SOP-12 of the QAPP respectively Samples will be analyzed for VOCs by USEPA Method 8260B Additional surface water andor sediment samples may be collected as necessary based on the results of this sampling and the pore water sampling The results of the surface water and sediment sampling will be used to evaluate human health and ecological risk

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 4-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

PW-31

PW-3 SWSD-09

PW-29 PW-28

HUNDRED ACRE POND

EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED OVERBURDEN GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED BEDROCK MONITORING WELL

PROPOSED PORE WATER SAMPLING LOCATION

PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING LOCATION

bullRESIDENTIAL BEDROCK

SAMPLING LOCATION

INTERPRETIVE PCETCE PLUME 2003 (MCL) BAR SCALE

1 = 200 JOB NO- 20554003

WKURI LANDFILL DATE JULY 2004 PROPOSED PORE WATER SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl SCALE AS NOTED WOODARDampCURRAN SAMPLING LOCATIONS FIGURE 4-1 LTMN PLAN DESIGNED BY KK CHECKED BY KK

DRAWN BY PFF 205540-u1-LTUN2draquoq

5 LIST OF ACRONYMS

11-DCA 111-TCA 12-DCA

bgs

cis-l2-DCE

DNAPL

FA

GP

HASP

IDW

LTMN

MCLs MSL MW

PCE PID ppm PPE PVC PW

QAPP

RTOEM

SD SOP SW

TCE

URI USEPA

VOCs

WampC WK

11-dichloroethane 111-trichloroethane 12-dichloroethane

below ground surface

cis-l2-dichloroethene

dense non-aqueous phase liquid

Fill Area

Geoprobe

Health and Safety Plan

investigation derived waste

Long-Term Monitoring Plan

maximum contaminant levels Mean Sea Level monitoring well

tetrachloroethylene photoionization detector parts per million personnel protection equipment polyvinyl chloride pore water

Quality Assurance Project Plan

Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

sediment Standard Operating Procedure surface water

trichloroethene

University of Rhode Island United State Environmental Protection Agency

volatile organic compounds

Woodard amp Curran West Kingston

West KingstonURI Superfund Site 5-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

APPENDIX A GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER SEDIMENT AND PORE WATER RESULTS

Table A-l December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-2 December 2002January 2003 Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-3 January 2003 Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-4 January 2003 Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-5 January 2003 Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-6 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Screening Results

Table A-7 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Pore-Water Analytical Results

Table A-8 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Screening Results

Table A-9 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Geoprobe Analytical Results

Table A-10 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Sediment Analytical Results

Table A-l 1 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Screening Results

Table A-12 May 2003 Supplemental Investigation Surface Water Analytical Results

Table A-13 June 2003 Residential Analytical Results

TABLE A-l DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE SCEENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location Boring Sample Depth (ft) pH Conductivity Turbidity m DO Temperature Collection Time Fixed Base Laboratory Analysis

ID Date Depth (ft) S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D S M D

GP-01A 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA NC 626 NA NC 0179 NA NC 999 NA NC 834 NA NC 110 NA 1435 1420 NA voc VOC

GP-01B 121902 32 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-OIC 010203 26 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-01D 010203 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-02A 121802 17 14 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1630 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-03A 121802 14 8 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC MA NA NC NA NA 1600 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-04A 121902 105 10 NC NC 573 NA NA 0770 NA NA 999 NA NA 998 NA NA 903 NA NA 1030 NA NA voc NA NA GP-06C 121902 14 12 NC NC NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA

GP-07A 121902 12 12 NC NC 557 NA NA 0081 NA NA 999 NA NA 836 NA NA 77 NA NA 940 NA NA VOC VOC dup metals NA NA

GP-08A 121802 12 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA GP-08B 121802 68 NC 42 66 NA 60i 585 NA 0323 02S3 NA 999 9yy NA 738 767 NA 1106 1030 NA J 3 l 5 1300 NA VOC VOC dup VOC GP-08C 121902 22 NC NC NC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

GP-10A 121802 56 NC 38 54 NA 597 604 NA 0099 0105 NA 999 999 NA 407 674 NA 985 945 NA 950 925 NA VOC VOC

GP-11A 121702 34 12 32 NC 610 615 NA 0113 0089 NA 999 999 NA 942 872 NA 1267 1074 NA 1440 1425 NA VOC voc NA GP-11B 121702 30 12 28 NC NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1535 1525 NA voc voc NA

GP-13A 121802 58 NC 38 n 56 NA 585 579 NA 0076 0081 NA 999 999 NA 839 907 NA 953 996 NA 825 800 NA voc VOC metals

GP-14A 121902 68 NC 42 66 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1630 1610 NA voc VOC GP-15A 121702 66 NC 40 63 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1335 1205 NA voc VOC GP-17A 121902 71 NC 42 70 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1440 1420 NA voc VOC GP-18A 122002 71 NC 55 71 NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA 1000 945 NA voc VOC GP-18B 122002 68 38 55 68 NC 632 583 NC 0623 0556 NC 999 999 NC 795 757 NC 1332 136 1315 1130 1100 VOC voc VOC metals

GP-18C 122002 68 38 55 68 645 637 63 0245 0285 0221 999 999 999 973 498 467 1387 1287 1332 1335 1330 1315 voc voc VOC GP-18D 122002 68 38 55 68 636 614 643 0194 0200 0172 999 999 999 920 904 1014 1228 1237 1267 1510 1455 1445 voc VOC metals VOC GP-19A 010203 26 26 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 920 NA NA voc NA NA GP-20A 010203 95 95 68 42 645 758 | 715 0414 0155 0183 E E E 116 1057 1062 112 107 11 1230 1300 1320 voc VOC VOC GP-20B 010203 94 94 70 42 704 712 681 0159 0223 0224 E E E 539 251 343 111 107 108 1340 1410 1420 voc voc voc GP-21A 010203 96 96 68 42 843 E E 0205 E E E E E 1061 E E 85 E E 1520 1535 1600 voc voc voc

NOTES 1 S = shallow M = middle D = deep

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC

4 VOC = volatile organic compounds metals by EPA Method 8260 = RCRA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected

6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

I Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

12192002

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzcne Bromochloromcthane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethanc Methyl ethyl kelonc n-Butylbenzene scc-Butylbenzene ICTt-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carton (ctrachloride Chlorobenzenc Chlorocthane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorololuene 4-Chlorotoluene Ditromochloromcthanc l2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobcnzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzcne Dichlorodifjuoromcthane

1 -Dichtorocthane 12-Dichloroethanc 11-Dichloroerhene cis-l2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethcnc 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropcne 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzcnc p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methvlene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propybcnzenc Stvrene - - ri ddJv jciJ c

1 122-Terrachloroctriane TetrachJoroelhcnc Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzenc 111 -Trichloroethane 12-Trichloroethanc

Trichloroethene Trichloronuoromethanc 123-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimcthylbenzene 1 35-Trimclhylbcnzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylcne mampp-Xylcne Tctrahydrofuran ten-Butyl alcohol Tert-amvl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-08B GP-08B-661

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 8

lt2 lt2 cl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-08B GP-08B-42-DUP

12182002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ~2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 9

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-10A GP-10A-541

12182002 Primary

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 - lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-IOA GP-10A-381

12182002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 1

bull 2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11A GP-11A-321

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2

^

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo5

ltSO lt2 lt2

G P - l l A GP-11A-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-I1B-28shy12172002

Primary

lt10 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

bull=bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O O

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -^ -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-11B GP-11B-121

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull52

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

0 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt-3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-56 12182002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 ltn

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-13A GP-13A-381

12182002 Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 f~3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 e2 lt2

GP-14A GP-14A-661

12192002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ctshylt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-15A-631

12172002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltMO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-15A GP-1SA-40shy12172002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-421

12192002 Primary

17 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 ^~i

ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^7

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-17A GP-17A-701

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt3

lt2 lt2 lt2 c

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

data xls205540 04tgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-08B GP-08B GP-08B GPIOA GP-10A GP-11A GP-11A OP-11B GP-11B GP-13A GP-13A GP-14A GP-15A GP-15A GP-I7A GP17A GP-08B-661 GP-08B-421 GP08B-42-DUP GP-10A-54 GP-10A-38 GP-1IA-321 GP-l lA-121 GP-I1B-281 GP l lB-121 GP13A-561 GP13A-381 GP-14A-661 GP-15A-631 GP-15A-401 GP-17A-42 GP-17A-701

12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 12182002 1 2 1 72002 2i 172002 12172002 12172002 12182002 12182002 12192002 12172002 12172002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary Pnmary Primary Primary Primary Primary Priinary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Hexanone lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10

Arsenic lt10 Barium 17 Cadmium lt20 Chromium lt10U Lead - lt50 Mercury lt020

Selenium - lt10 Silver lt50

lt not detected at Indicated reporting limit - not analyzed J raquo estimated U a revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

dataxis205540Wlgt Page 2

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Dielhyl ether Benzene Bromobcnzenc Bromochloromelhanc Bromodichloromethanc Bramofonn Bromomethane Methyl ethyl kctone n-Butylbcnzcne sec-Butylbenzene teit-Butylbenzcne Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzcnc Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromcthanc 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromcthane 12-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 12-Dibromocthane Dibromomcthanc 12-Dichlorobenzcne 13-Dichlorobenzenc 1 4-Dichlorobenzcnc Dichloroditluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 12-Dichlorocthane 11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethenc trans- 1 2-DichIoroethene 12-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropanc cis-l3-Dicliloropropcnc trans- 1 3-Dchloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 11-Dichloropropcne Bthylbenzcnc Hcxachlorobuladicne Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluenc Methyl isobutyl ketonc Methylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbcnzcne Stvrene - bull--bull r Vine

1122-TetiacriIoroelhane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-TrichJorobenzene 1 24-Trichloroben2enc 111-Trichloroethane 112-Trichloroethane Trichloroetricne Trichloronuoromethanc

1 23-TrichJoropropanc 1 24-TrimethyIbcnzene 135-TrimcthyIbenzcne Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl elher dMsopropylether

GP-18A GP1SA-71 12202002

Primary

36 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 ltT lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-I8B-68 12202002

Primary

lt10 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull 2 bull2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B OP-18B-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 laquo2 ^-)

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18B GP-18B-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 ltI lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^)

laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-68 1 2202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-I8C-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^3

lt2 lt2 lt2

^

lt 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18C GP-18C-381

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 =2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-681

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 fgt i lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-551

12202002 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltgt lt2 lt2 ^2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lts lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ ^ J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltS

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-18D GP-18D-38 12202002

Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIOJ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt-2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt1

lt10J ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt^

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-19A-26 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-421 GP-20A-951 GP-20A-681 GP-20A-421

01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltL lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ltIO lt 0 lt I O lt0 lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 2 -2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt lt2 lt2 lt2 ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2] C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bull=10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 c2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt -^ v T lt-i -2 bull2 v2 ^2 lt i ltj

lt2 lt-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 to

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4 I J lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 8 2 lt2 lt2 II lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt2 e2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Pages

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-18A GP-18B GP-18B GP-18B GP-18C GP-18C GP-18C GP-18D GP-18D GP-18D GP-19A GP-1A GP-1A GP-20A GP-20A GP-20A GP-18A-7]1 GP-18B-681 GP-18B-551 GP-18B-381 GPI8C-681 GP-18C-551 GP-18C-381 GP-18D-681 GP-18D551 GP-18D381 GP-19A-261 GP-1A-661 GP-1A-42 GP-20A-951 GP20A-681 GP-20A-421

12202002 12202002 1 2202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 12202002 01022003 12182002 12182002 01022003 01022003 01022003 PTimsry Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

Ethyl t-butyl ether lt2 pound1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10

Uraquok_C IJm^teaot lt10 lt10 lt10 lt 10 lt10 lt10J

JJ a=Mniimiar lt deg | TUI

bullIJHHHH TCSfHB^En_nlaquoKBmmiiraquo

Birium 47 29 Cadmium lt20 lt20 Chromium lt10U lt10U -Lead 18 34J Mercury lt020 lt020 Selenium lt10 lt1Q -

Silver lt50 lt50

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit bulllaquo not analyzed J = estimated U raquo revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics = EPA RCRA-8 metals

d3taxla20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Broinobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromelhane Bromoform Bromomcthane Methyl ethyl kctonc n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene terl-Butvlbenzene Carbon disulftde Carbon tetrachloridc Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotolucne Dibromochloromethanc 1 2-Dibromo-3-ch]oropropanc 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2Dichlorobenzene 1 3 -Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dich]orobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethanc 12-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethenc cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans-l2-DichIoroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 13-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 13-Dichloropropene 22-Dlchloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropenc Ethylbcnzcnc Hexacnlorobutadiene [sopropylbenzene p-Isopropyholuene Methyl isobutyl kctone Mcthylene chloride Methyl tcrt-buryi ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Sryrene 11 1 2-Tctiachloroelhanc 1 1 22-Tctrachloroelhane Tctrachloroethene Toluene 123-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111-Trichlorocthane 112-Trichloroethanc Trichloroethene Trichlorolluoromethane 123-Trichloropropane 124-Trimethylbcnzcne l35-Trimcthylben2enc Vinyl chloride o-Xvlene mampp-Xylene Tctrahydroftiran ten-Butyl alcohol Ten-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylcther

GP-20B GP-20B-941

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 _j

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 3J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 S

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-701

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

ltIO lt2

lt2 _l lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 U lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-20B GP-20B-421

01022003 Primary

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullC2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 bullo lt2 lt2 lt2 bull-2

^ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A-96 01022003

Primary

e lO lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^-5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -T2

-2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt=2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5

lt80 lt2 lt2

GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-7A GP-21A-681 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-141 GP-3A-81 GP-4A-10 GP-6C-141 GP-7A-121

01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002 12192002 Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary Primary

lt10 lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt2 _ lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lta lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ltZ bull lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-2 r^gt ltl lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 --2 bull lt lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 fl lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 laquo2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt I O ltIO lt10 lt10 lt5 lti laquo5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 bull2 ^r lt T t -) ^ T - bull^ -2 bull 2 tj ~ lt lt2

^2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt80 lt1 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

GP-7A GP-7A-12-DU

12192002 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt2 lt2 bull3 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 C2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt I O lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 -2 t^

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt5 lt80 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt

TABLE A-2 DECEMBER 2002JANUARY 2003 GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

GP-20B GP-20B GP-20B GP-21A GP-21A GP-21A GP-2A GP-3A GP-4A GP-6C GP-20B-941 GP-20B-101 GP-20B-421 GP-21A-961 GP-21A-68 GP-21A-42 GP-2A-14 GP-3A-S GP-4A-10 GP-6C-14 01022003 01012003 01022003 01027003 01022003 01022003 12182002 12182002 12192002 12192002

Ethyl t-butyl ether Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

lt2 Primary

bulla Primary

lta Primary

lt2 2-Heraquoarione lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 L deg lt10 ltIO lt10 lt10

Arsenic Barium -Cadmium -Chromium

Lead Mercury Selenium Silver

lt not detected at indicated reporting limit - = not analyzed j = estimated U z revised to norvdetect during vaWatbn VOC EPA Method 6260 Fix Base Laboratory Inorganics EPA RCRA-8 metals

GP-7A GP-7A GP-7A-12 GP-7A-12DUP 12192002 12192002

Primary Duplicate lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10

lt10 lt10 91J 15 lt0 lt20

L lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

lt020 lt020 lt10 lt10 lt50 lt50

dataxls2055004lot Page 6

TABLE A-3 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP ID Date

SW-1 1803 600 0087 0 98 47 258

SW-2 1803 598 0042 189 658 25 186

SW-3 1803 48 0035 149 920 25 266

SW-4 1803 468 006 1182 1157 34 327

SW-5 1803 401 441 42 796 89 336

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity= mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene Dibromochloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane 1 2-Dichlorobenzene 1 3-Dichlorobenzene 1 4-Dichlorobenzene Dichlorodifluoromethane 11-Dichloroethane 1 2-Dichloroethane 11-Dichloroethene cis-1 2-DichIoroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis- 1 3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropylto luene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl ten-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-TetrachIoroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane Trichloroethene Trichlorofluoromethane 1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 1 35-Trimethylbenzene

SW-1 01082003

Primary ItialTiiiilTilltHIttWSwsfflHSaKI

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 19 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 6 U

lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primaryaasajampijsfoiftii^PipSsBfSHEwSfll

lt I O lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 01082003

Primary i^tfMJftVfllCiiitfnyrtiifMMMMKMM

lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 ltS lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-4 01W2003

Primary

bull bull 1 0 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^ -gt

lt2 bull 2

lt2 bull | ()R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt9

lt2

lt2

lt2 lt2 bull 2 lt2 lt2 lt -T

lt2 lt2 lt2J t1

lt2 lt2 e-T

lt2 -O

--gt

laquo-gt

lt2 lt2

lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

lt10 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-5 01082003

Primary

5SHS8BRlwHHf lt10 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10R lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2

ltIO lt5 2

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 1

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-butyl ether 2-Hexanone

jTflHiTOliOllM 2-Chlorophenol4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinirrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate Hexachlorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Ch loroethoxy)methane bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz(a)anthracene Benzo(a)pyrene Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo(k)fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz(ah)anthracene Fluoranthene Fluorene Indeno(l23-cd)pyrene Pyrene Hexachloroethane Isophorone

SW-1 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

1 lt1()

1 lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-1 01082003 Duplicate

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 ^^^MtlMIJSl

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-2 01082003

Primary lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10

lt5 lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt20 lt20 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

SW-3 SW-4 SW-5 01082003 01 082003 01082003

Primary Primary Primary lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt5R lt5R lt5R lt80R lt80R lt80R

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

lt10 lt10 1 lt10 ^UUJJmjUWUAjMfc

BlB0llllHHBBBraquoHl ^sectHllnl __ ^ lt5 lt10 lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5J lt5J lt5 lt5J lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5J lt5

ltIO lt I O lt11 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt10( bull-10J lt1U lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5 lt5

lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt20 lt20J lt22 lt20 lt20 lt22 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2J lt2J lt2J lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-4 JANUARY 2003 SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area

SW-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SWM SW-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01 OS2003 01082003

Primary Duplicate Primary Primary Primary Primary

N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt-T lt2 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt1 lt2 Pyridine lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 --21 lt2 2-Methylnaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Chloronaphthalene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Phenanthrene lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lti lt2 Dibenzofuran lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 Aniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Chloroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 2-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 3-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 4-Nitroaniline lt2 lt2 lt2 lt2 ^-T lt2 Carbazole

^fj jj|Jf5^S^JMK3MHBftBK88 iil S Aluminum

lt2ijfsampiiaMlt200

lt2

lt200

M i_l-__^Lmdash Lmdash ^L 1 1200 P l 4 0 J

1 |

nf2

70J

lt2 jfflaumMraquo|laquoMK

110J Antimony lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Arsenic lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Barium 13 12 13 69J 65J 78J Beryllium lt4() lt40 lt40U lt40 bull40 lt40 Cadmium lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 lt20 Calcium 7700 7300 5900 1500 2000 2600 Chromium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Cobalt lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 bull50 lt50 Copper 191 17J 46J 26J lt10 lt10 Iron lt50 lt50 1300 67 97 180 Lead lt50 lt50 11 lt50 lt50 lt50 Magnesium 1300 1200 1100 540 440 730 Manganese 17 15 120 170 11 32 Nickel lt10 lt10 lt10 lt I O lt10 lt10 Potassium 1400 1300 3700 1800 890 1000 Selenium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 Silver lt5() lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 lt50 Sodium 5200 4900 1400 1900 2300 3400 Thallium lt10 lt10 lt10 lt10 = 10 lt10 Vanadium 12 lt10U lt50U lt50 bullbull50 lt50 Zinc lt38U lt34U lt50U lt32U -26U lt21U Mercury lt020 0057J 0054J 0073J bull(l20 O20

lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected U = revised to non-detect during validation VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

dataxls205540 04lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Acetone Diethyl ether Benzene Bromobenzene Bromochloromethane Bromodichloromethane Bromoform Bromomethane Methyl ethyl ketone n-Butylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene tert-Butylbenzene Carbon disulfide Carbon tetrachloride Chlorobenzene Chloroethane Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chloro toluene Dibromocliloromethane 1 2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 2-Dibromoethane Dibromomethane

2-Dichlorobenzene 3-Dichlorobenzene 4-Dichlorobenzene

Dichlorodifluoromethane 1-Dichloroethane 2-Dichloroethane

11-Dichloroethene cis- 1 2-Dichloroethene trans- 1 2-Dichloroethene 1 2-Dichloropropane 1 3-Dichloropropane cis-l3-Dichloropropene trans- 1 3-Dichloropropene 22-Dichloropropane 1 1 -Dichloropropene Ethylbenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Isopropylbenzene p-Isopropyltoluene Methyl isobutyl ketone Methylene chloride Methyl tert-butyl ether Naphthalene n-Propylbenzene Styrene 111 2-Tetrachloroethane 1 1 22-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1 23-Trichlorobenzene 1 24-Trichlorobenzene 111 -Trichloroethane 1 1 2-Trichloroethane TrichJoroethene Trichlorofluoromethane

SD-1 01082003

PrimarybullliiiBiiSHB

lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 ltUO lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 573

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 136J lt140

SD-1 01082003 Duplicate

MBMKaSSiiiSMBwBSHBaHH lt1400 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140

lt1400R lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140J lt140 lt110 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt110 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400 lt710 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 748

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt110 186

lt140

SD-2 01082003

Primary

lt3800J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J

lt3800R lt3SOJ lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J lt1900J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt290J lt380J lt380J

SD-3 01082003

Primary yfflBMHWM^gSBB^I

lt4400 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400R lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600J lt600J lt600J lt880J lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880

lt4400 lt2200 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt600 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

SD-4 01082003

Primary

lt1200 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt91 lt91

lt120 lt1200R

lt120 ltI20 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12K lt91

lt12D lt12H lt120 lt91

lt120 lt91

lt120 lt12n lt12D

lt120 lt120J lt120 lt91 lt91

lt12() lt12o lt91

lt12U lt120 lt120 lt120 lt12(i lt120 lt12U lt12(l lt12U

lt1200 lt610 lt120 lt120 lt120 lt120 ltI20 lt91

lt120 lt 1 2 lt gt lt120 lt12() lt120 lt91

lt120 lt120

SD-5 01082003

Primary

lt1100 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 lt83

lt110 lt1100R

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 010 lt110

ltUOJ lt110 lt83 lt83 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100 lt550 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt83 ltI10 lt110

dataxls20554004Igt Page 1

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

1 23-Trichloropropane 1 24-Trimethylbenzene 135-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride o-Xylene mampp-Xylene Tetrahydrofuran tert-Butyl alcohol Tert-amyl methyl ether di-Isopropylether Ethyl t-buryl ether 2-Hexanoneampamp^poundti$mwMm 2-ChJorophenol 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 24-Dichlorophenol 24-Dimethylphenol 24-Dinitrophenol 46-Dinitro-2-methylphenoI 2-Nitrophenol 26-Dichlorophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenol 245-Trichlorophenol 246-Trichlorophenol Benzoic acid 2-Methylphenol 3+4-Methylphenol Benzyl alcohol 2346-Tetrachlorophenol 24-Dinitrotoluene 26-Dinitrotoluene Nitrobenzene Dimethyl phthalate Di-n-butyl phthalate di-n-octyl-phthalate bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate HexacWorobenzene Benzidine 33-Dichlorobenzidine Azobenzene bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-ChJoroethyl) ether bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether Butylbenzyl phthalate 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether Diethyl phthalate Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Anthracene Benz[a]anthracene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b] fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo(ghi)perylene Chrysene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Fluoranthene

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt710R lt5700R

lt140 ltI40 ltI40

lt1400

lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300J lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300 lt300

SD-1 01082003

lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140 lt140

lt7IOR lt5700R

lt140 lt140 lt140

lt1400bullmmmm

lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380J lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380 lt380

SD-2 01082003

lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt1900R lt15000R

lt380J lt380J lt380J

lt3800J

lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590J lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590 lt590

SD-3 01082003

lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880 lt880

lt2200R lt35000R

lt880 lt880 lt880

lt4400

lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600J lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600 lt600

SD-4 0108003

lt120 lt120 lt12) lt120 lt12) lt12)

lt610R lt480nR

lt12 gt lt120 lt12)

lt12(K)

lt27raquo lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270J lt27l lt27ltl lt270 lt270 lt27o lt27l lt27l lt27l lt270f lt27H lt27D lt27H lt270 lt27n lt27 lt27n lt27 lt27 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270J lt27lt) lt270 lt270 lt27U lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270 lt270J lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27C lt27(i lt270 lt270 lt270 lt27(raquo lt27(l lt270

SD-5 01082003

lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110 lt110

lt550R lt4400R

lt110 lt110 lt110

lt1100

IJlliMflnir^K^iillMIIHimnaHnssjiiiTCp

lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280J lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280 lt280

dataxls20554004lgt Page 2

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-1 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082(03 01082003

Fluorene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Indeno[l23-cd]pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Hexacliloroethane lt300J lt380J lt590J lt600J lt270J lt280J Isophorone lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(i lt280 N-Nitrosodimethylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27(l lt280 n-Nitrosodiphenylamine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27() lt280 Pyridine lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Methylnaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Chloronaphthalene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Phenanthrene lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Dibenzofuran lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 Aniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 4-Chloroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 2-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 3-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280 4-Nitroaniline lt300 lt380 lt590 lt600 lt27d lt280 Carbazole lt300 lt590 lt600 lt270 lt280

Aldrin lt24 lt24J a-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 b-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl

D-BHC lt24 lt24J ltl G-BHC lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDD lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDE lt24 lt24J lt1 44-DDT lt24 lt24J lt1 Dieldrin lt24 lt24J lt1 Endosulfan I lt24 lt24J Endosulfan II lt24 lt24J Endosulfan sulfate lt24 lt24J Endrin lt24 lt24J Endrin aldehyde lt24 lt24J Heptachlor lt24 lt24J Heptachlor epoxide lt24 lt24J Toxaphene lt79 lt99 lt160 lt160J lt73 lt73 Methoxychlor lt23 lt36 lt36J Chlordane

Aluminum 5000 4100 28000 6800 3800 4800 Antimony lt23J lt22J lt43J lt47J lt2U lt21J Arsenic 13 085J 71 lt23 061J Barium 14 12 47 38 18 27 Beryllium 029J 027J 11 069J 015J 026J Cadmium lt023 lt022 022J 022J lt021 lt021 Calcium 550J 510J 1500J 340J 3301 1200J Chromium 42 32 21 44 33 21 Cobalt 14 13 23 067 Copper 45 15 44 51 Iron 6000 5700 15000 1300 4000 7500 Lead 13 98 33 24 67 36 Magnesium 900J 870J 1800J 310J 590J 1500J

dataxls20554004lgt Page3

TABLE A-5 JANUARY 2003 SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

SD-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SD-5 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003 01082003

Manganese 84J 83J 94J 20J 57J 150J Mercury 0087 011 015 015 002 I I 0043 Nickel 29 23 8 13J 73 14 Potassium 390J 350J 720J 230J 3201 1100J Selenium lt12 lt11 25 18J lt10 lt10 Silver lt059 lt056 lt11 lt12 lt052 lt052 Sodium lt120 lt110 220 lt230 lt100 120 Thallium lt12 lt11 lt22 lt23 lt() 072J Vanadium 12 11 39 54 61 10 Zinc 39 35 55 23 41 26 lt = not detected at indicated reporting limit J = estimated R = rejected VOC = EPA Method 8260 Fix Base Laboratory SVOC = EPA Method 8270 Pesticides = EPA Method 8031 PCB = EPA Method 8082 Inorganics = EPA Method TAL Metals

ill dataxls20554004lgt Page 4

TABLE A-6 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters

PH Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP Location ID Date

PW-1 5703 573 0101 443 064 132 175

PW-2 5803 602 092 98 289 122 42

PW-3 050803 626 0105 213 968 127 72 PW-4 05062003 618 019 457 294 129 -18 PW-5 05072003 621 0125 805 822 139 167 PW-6 05072003 632 0236 346 815 125 173 PW-7 05072003 617 0117 516 735 134 178 PW-8 05062003 585 0202 383 273 118 105 PW-9 05072003 564 0116 602 238 143 50

PW-10 05072003 648 0131 139 1132 142 166 PW-11 05072003 67 0098 39 724 171 151 PW-1 3 05082003 645 0148 328 181 115 -31 PW-1 4 05082003 634 0114 30 1008 118 178 PW-15 05082003 579 0115 55 166 113 130 PW-1 6 05072003 623 0174 123 359 148 13 PW-17 05062003 647 0087 258 807 125 137 PW-18 05062003 602 0085 439 1076 121 171 PW-1 9 05062003 581 0115 278 31 11 -12 PW-20 05072003 596 0071 642 34 114 57 PW-21 05072003 57 0058 233 86 116 190 PW-22 05072003 588 0076 515 382 122 57 PW-23 05072003 57 0072 892 258 121 114 PW-24 05062003 606 0114 153 607 127 -4 PW-25 05082003 56 0111 782 197 113 192

PW-25 Duplicate 05082003 561 0106 981 182 115 200 PW-26 05082003 587 0095 551 191 116 118 PW-27 05082003 594 0121 159 195 123 34

1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC ORP = mV 3 The final water quality reading prior to sampling is reported

TABLE A-7 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION PORE-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene PW-1 11 ND ND ND PW-2 ND ND ND 83 PW-3 13 ND ND ND PW-4 ND ND ND ND PW-5 7 ND ND ND PW-6 71 ND ND ND PW-7 86 ND ND ND PW-8 23 ND ND 54 PW-9 ND ND ND ND

PW-10 ND ND ND ND PW-11 82 ND ND ND PW-1 3 ND ND ND ND PW-1 4 ND ND ND ND PW-1 5 17 ND ND ND PW-1 6 ND ND ND ND PW-1 7 19 11 ND ND PW-1 8 30 87 55 12 PW-1 9 23 17 ND 35 PW-20 200 E 36 72 15 PW-21 360 E 56 E 12 ND PW-22 140 31 64 21 PW-23 220 35 77 79 PW-24 22 ND ND 12 PW-25 ND ND ND ND

PW-25 Duplicate ND ND ND ND PW-26 20 55 ND ND PW-27 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Page 1

TABLE A-8 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE SCREENING RESULTS WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date Boring

Depth (ft) Sam S

)le Depth (ft) M D S

PH M D S

Conductivity M D S

Turbidity7 M D S

DO M D S

Temperature M D

Collection Time S M D S

Lab Analysis M D

GP-22 050803 12 10 NA NA 649 NA NA 01 NA NA E NA NA 1457 NA NA 866 NA NA 1033 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-23 050803 18 6 NA 16 615 NA 638 0049 NA 097 E NA E 1575 NA 1292 364 NA 926 1636 NA 1107 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-24 050803 16 5 NA 14 632 NA 655 0055 NA 0052 E NA E 644 NA 1091 1021 NA 93 1218 NA 1149 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-25 050803 16 5 NA 14 618 NA 648 0052 NA 0057 E NA E 512 NA 564 968 NA 904 1344 NA 1324 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-26 050803 23 5 NA 21 622 NA 63 0106 NA 0058 E NA E 115 NA 463 1181 NA 953 1452 NA 1438 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-27 050803 33 5 NA 31 622 NA 665 0082 NA 0107 E NA E 692 NA 039 912 NA 961 1601 NA 1540 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-28 050903 16 6 NA 14 578 NA 514 063 NA 0064 999 NA 135 1241 NA 1206 84 NA 75 728 NA ^ 655 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-29 050903 10 8 NA NA 619 NA NA 052 NA NA 999 NA NA 1111 NA NA 85 NA NA 800 NA NA Field VOC NA NA Gp-^n 050903 28 16 NA 26 NC NA NC NC NA bull NC NC NA NC NC NA NC NC NA NC 1000 NA 945 n Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-31 050903 35 18 NA 33 66 NA 674 018 NA 0133 999 NA 999 1006 NA 361 79 NA 97 910 NA 900 Field VOC NA Field VOC

GP-32 050903 21 19 NA NA 672 NA NA 0669 NA NA 999 NA NA 1843 NA NA 109 NA NA 1040 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

GP-33 050903 17 16 NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA NC NA NA 1100 NA NA Field VOC NA NA

I GP-34 GP-35 GP-36 GP-37 GP-38 GP-39

050903 050903 050903 050903 050903 050903

20 11 12

115 11

12

18 9 10 9 9 10

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 663 673 677 NC 707

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 0052 065 058 NC

0058

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 999 999 999 NC 999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 1999 1174 1362 NC

1999

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NC 11 95 104 NC 121

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

1145 1250 1315 1345 1405 1425

NA NA NANA NANA

NA NA

NA NA

NA NA

Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC Field VOC

Field VOC

NA NA NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA NA NA NA

WnTFQshy 1 lt shy challnui Mshy miHHlf n shy Hoon

2 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

3 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature = degC 4 VOC - volatile organic compounds EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory metals = RCPvA metals 5 dup = duplicate sample collected 6 NC = not collected NA = not applicable 7 999 NTU is the maximum turbiditiy reading of the field meter 8 E = Field meter error no reading

Geoprobe borings were conducted using 1-inch diamter steel rods The stainless-steel retractable screen was decontaminated between each location Groundwater sampling was conducted using dedicated tubing and a peristaltic pump or check valve if water depth prevented use of the pump Samples were collected after puging approximately one well volume and collecting field water quality parameters If location displayed poor recharge purged until dry sampled after well recharged and did not collect water quality data

TABLE A-9 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION GEOPROBE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane

GP-22-10 ND ND ND GP-23-6 290 E 90 E 79

GP-23-16 230 E 46 63 GP-24-51 200 E 64 8 GP-24-14 104 E 35 53 GP-25-5 65 28 ND

GP-25-14 80 47 ND GP-26-5 ND ND ND

GP-26-21 39 18 ND GP-27-51 ND ND ND

GP-27-31 21 18 ND GP-28-6 270 E 89 E 84

GP-28-141 320 E 96 E 81 GP-29-8 79 E 47 ND GP-30-16 ND ND ND GP-30-25 ND ND ND GP-31-18 76 ND ND GP-31-33 79 72 ND GP-32-19 120 30 57 GP-33-161 160 63 92 GP-34-18 ND ND ND GP-35-91 200 70 13

GP-36-10 95 34 59 GP-37-91 83 46 56 GP-38-9 ND ND ND GP-39-10 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL= micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

cis-l2-Dichloroethene

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

TABLE A-10 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SEDIMENT ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID SD-6 SD-7 SD-8

Tetrachloroethene ND ND ND

Trichloroethene ND 32 ND

1 2-Dichloroethane ND ND ND

cis-1 2-Dichloroethene ND 105 ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

Pagel

TABLE A-11 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER SCREENING RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Field Water Quality Parameters Location

ID Date pff Conductivity Turbidity DO Temperature ORP

SW-6 5603 647 102 16 1228 134 66

SW-7 5603 631 163 0 1416 134 125

Notes 1 DO = dissolved oxygen concentration ORP = oxidation reduction potential

2 Units conductivity = mScm2 turbidity = NTU DO = mgL temperature degC ORP = mV

ill

TABLE A-12 MAY 2003 SUPPLEMENTAL INVESTIGATION SURFACE WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 12-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene SW-6 14 ND ND ND SW-7 14 ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

E = Exceeded the upper calibration limit ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (5 ugL for all four compounds) VOC = Modified EPA Method 8260 Field Laboratory

TABLE A-13 RESIDENTIAL GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA

Sample ID Date Tetrachloroethene Trichloroethene 1 2-Dichloroethane cis-1 2-Dichloroethene 902 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 892 Plains Road June-03 ND ND ND ND 870 Plains Road October-03 ND ND ND ND

Results provided in ugL = micro-grams per liter

ND = Not detected above the laboratory detection limit (2 ugL for all four compounds)

APPENDIX B GROUNDWATER MODEL REPORT

INTRODUCTION

The groundwater model developed for the URJ Landfill Site was undertaken with the intent of evaluating the groundwater flow through the system This model was used to evaluate the flow dynamics at the site to aid in the placement of new monitoring wells

MODEL CONSTRUCTION

The steps in constructing the groundwater model involve developing the model grid establishing the boundary conditions and estimating aquifer properties The data necessary for completing the model were collected during field activities in the fall and winter of 20022003

The flow system was modeled using the modular three-dimensional finite difference model or MODFLOW developed by the USGS A particle tracking model MODPATH was used to enhance the understanding of contaminant transport at the site MODPATH allows simulated particles to be released into the flow field and tracks their movement through the flow system In order to construct and run the model within MODFLOW the model space was defined and divided into discrete blocks or cells to which properties and conditions were assigned for use in computation This discretization of the model space was accomplished by establishing a customized grid over the model area in plan view

The number of layers in the groundwater model is based upon hydrogeologic knowledge both gathered at the site and available in published information collected by the USGS (Johnston amp Dickerman 1984) The layer geometry was assigned during construction of the model grid and was based on drilling results geologic mapping seismic refraction surveys and surface topography Each cell within the grid was assigned a bottom elevation Cells within the first layer were also assigned a top elevation The bottom of a cell is equivalent to the top of the cell located directly beneath it In this manner the third dimension is added to the groundwater model

Once a grid was established the limits of flow within the system were assigned to the grid The limits to flow are referred to as boundary conditions Two types of boundary conditions used in modeling this site were simulated physical and hydraulic boundaries Physical boundaries are geologic or hydrologic features such as surface water bodies or the contact between a low permeable and a permeable unit These features represent a permanent influence on the flow of groundwater Hydraulic boundaries are boundaries that are derived from flow nets or groundwater elevation maps An example of a hydraulic boundary is a groundwater divide where flow neither enters nor leaves the flow system

The following sections describe the model construction for the URJ Landfill Site

Model Grid

The model domain for the LTRI Landfill model is depicted in Figure B-l The area modeled is approximately 16000 acres Initial cell size is 100 feet by 100 feet Based on initial RI field activities and existing reports three layers were incorporated in the model The overburden was modeled consistent with the surfidal geology in the area The elevations lor the top and bottom of each layer are based on available well information drilling results seismic refraction surveying results and the aerial topographic survey The uppermost two layers in the model represent the overburden at the site and varied based on soil thickness determined by drilling at the site The top 25 feet of bedrock was incorporated into the model as a third layer of uniform thickness beneath the overburden deposits

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-1 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

5000 Flit

Figure B-1 Originals m color Model Boundary Conditions

URI Landfill Site

Boundary Conditions

The model domain was selected to incorporate the boundary conditions sufficiently far from the study area thereby minimizing the influence of the boundary conditions on the model outcome Boundary conditions were incorporated into the first layer of the model Four types of boundary conditions were used for incorporation in the URI Landfill groundwater model

bull No flow boundaries

bull Well boundaries

bull Surface water boundaries and

Surface drains such as wetlands

The no flow boundaries were placed where flow neither enters nor exits the model These boundaries are represented by the grey areas depicted on Figure B-2

Major surface water bodies in the area (ie Hundred Acre Pond Thirty Acre Pond Chipuxet River etc) were incorporated as river nodes nodes The elevations of the cells associated with these boundaries (surface water) are based on the elevations from the USGS topographic maps of the area The river nodes are denoted on Figure B-l by the green cells

Wetland areas within the model domain were assumed to be areas of groundwater discharge from the flow system As such the wetlands were simulated as drains The elevations for the drain cells used to simulate the wetlands were based on the TJSGS topographic maps of the area Drains are depicted on Figure B-l as filled yellow grid squares

Two separate well fields operating within the model domain were simulated using well boundary conditions The first field consisting of three pumping wells is the URI water supply wells located adjacent to the Chipuxet River just south of Thirty-Acre Pond The second field consists of one well located south of the URI well field adjacent to the Chipuxet River and is used by the local fire department as a fire suppression water supply Pumping rates for these wells are provided in Table C-l below and are based on reported pumping rates (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Table B-l Pumping Rates for Simulated Wells

Well Field Name Pumping Rate (MGD) Pumping Rate (FtVday)

Kingston Fire District 018 24064

URI Water Supply 071 94920

Model Parameters

Subsequent to establishing the grid and boundary conditions for the model aquifer parameters were assigned to the grid nodes The parameters assigned to the model include hydraulic conductivity storage coefficient and recharge A discussion of the values and distributions assigned to the model space for each of these parameters is discussed below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-3 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Hydraulic Conductivity Zone Value

Figure B-2

Model Hydraulic Conductivity Zones

Hydraulic Conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity values for the URI Landfill model space were assigned based on distributions provided in reports on the Chipuxet River Valley aquifer system (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) A representation of the distribution of hydraulic conductivities for the aquifer system is provided in Figure B-2 The green areas represent glacial till and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 1 footday The gold areas represent a transition zone between glacial till and the higher energy valley fill deposits and were assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 10 feetday The light brown area represents glacial outwash deposits and was assigned a horizontal hydraulic conductivity of 80 feetday The final zone depicts the higher energy outwash deposits and was assigned a value of 250 feetday These values are within the range of hydraulic condutivities presented by the 1JSGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The vertical hydraulic conductivity for each of these zones was assigned as 110 of the horizontal hydraulic conductivity for the zone

Storage Coefficients

The storage coefficients assigned in the model were assigned such that they corresponded to the hydraulic conductivity zones depicted in Figure B-2 The flow system storage within the unconfmed overburden is related to the specific yield of the aquifer material Till deposits were assigned a specific yield of 10 The outwash sand and gravels and transition zone between the outwash and till were assigned a specific yield of 20 to reflect the better sorted material of the outwash and transition zones

Recharge

The ability for precipitation to enter the groundwater flow system is governed by a number of factors including slope vegetation and surficial material type Foe example steep slopes contribute to more run-off and less infiltration while flat areas lend themselves to increased infiltration Additionally highly transmissive materials tend to allow more infiltration than materials with low transmissivity Based on work completed by the USGS (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) the recharge zones are depicted on Figure B-3 and correspond to areas of till versus areas of sand and gravel valley fill deposits The recharge value for till areas used in the model was 251 x 103 feetday (11 inchesyear) or 24 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman) The recharge value for the outwash deposits was 468 x 103 feetday (205 inchesyear) or 45 of the annual precipitation for Kingston (Johnston and Dickerman 1984)

Preliminary Model Calibration

The model was tested against the three existing wells on site to ensure that the model was not grossly over-predicting or under-predicting water levels at those limited locations Additionally base-flow from the modeled Chipuxet River was compared to historical stream gauging results for the gauging station in Kingston It was assumed that the low flow discharges measured at that gauging station were representative of baseflow conditions Low flow discharges varied between 35 and 277 CFS depending on the period of record and the number of consecutive days observed (Johnston and Dickerman 1984) The discharge computed by the model for the Chipuxet River was 77 CFS which is within the limits described above As additional data is gathered during the RIFS process the model will be updated and appropriately calibrated

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-5 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Recharge Zone Value 1 El 4680e-003

4680e-OO3

2510e-003

Figure B-3 Model Recharge Zones

PRELIMINARY MODEL RESULTS

In order to assist in the evaluation of the placement of additional monitoring wells on the site the model was run and particles were placed upgradient of the landfill to track their movement from the former drum storage area The resulting flow field and particle tracks are depicted in Figure B-4 Head in this area of the model varies from approximately 190 feet in the upland till areas to 96 feet near Hundred Acre Pond The groundwater potentiometric surface is depicted by the blue contour lines presented at five foot intervals The flow paths are drawn perpendicular to the contour lines in red and indicate the direction of groundwater movement at the site Particles were placed in the area of the former drum storage area released into the flow-field and tracked to provide a visual representation of flow at the site Flow occurs from the till covered bedrock highlands east of the landfill towards Hundred Acre Pond located west of the site Hundred Acre Pond is a part of the larger Chipuxet River that flows from northeast to southwest west of the site Initially flow is dominated by westward movement off the bedrocktill highlands As flow enters the deeper unconsolidated valley fillglacial outwash deposits groundwater begins to flow in a more northwesterly direction toward Hundred Acre Pond As groundwater approaches Hundred Acre Pond it turns abruptly due west as it is influenced by the small steeply sloped unnamed hill adjacent to Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site B-7 Woodard amp Curran Final Work Plandoc July 2004

Figure B-4 Preliminary Model Results URI Landfill Site

LONG -TERM MONITORING WELL NETWORK WORK PLAN APPENDIX C

VERTICAL PROFILING AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site South Kingstown Rhode Island

July 2004

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE NO

10 Introduction 1 11 Project Goals 1 12 Site Conceptual Model 2 121 Natural Site Setting 2 122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants 2 1221 Groundwater 2 1222 Summary of Results 3 123 URI Pond Investigation 3 1231 Pore Water 3 1232 Surface Water 6 1233 Sediment 6 1234 Summary of Results 6 13 Seismic Results 6 131 Summary of Results 8 14 Sequence of Field Activities 8 20 Vertical Profiling Plan 13 21 Proposed Monitoring Well Locations 14 22 Selection of Drilling and Sampling Methods 15 221 Exploration Methods 15 222 Overburden Drilling 17 223 Bedrock Drilling 18 23 Down-Hole Geophysical Methods 18 24 Vertical Profile Sample Collection and Analysis 19 241 Sample Collection 19 242 Sample Analyses 20 25 Selection of Monitoring Well Screen Depths 21 26 Equipment Decontamination 21 30 Proposed Monitoring Well Network 23 31 Compliance Monitoring Wells 23 32 Plume Monitoring Wells 25

TABLES

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs Table 3-1 Proposed Long-Term Monitoring Well Construction Details

West KJngstonURl Superfund Site Page i Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

FIGURES

Figure 1-1 Detected VOCs in Groundwater Figure 1-2 Interpretive Overburden PCETCE Plume Figure 1-3 Bedrock Surface Elevation Map Figure 1-4 Vertical Profiling Locations Figure 1-5 Proposed LTMN Installation Schedule

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A Seismic Survey Attachment B Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP Attachment C Monitoring Well Installation SOP Attachment D On-Site Laboratory SOP Attachment E DNAPL Contingency Plan Attachment F IDW Management Plan Attachment G RIDEM IDW Policy Memo 95-01

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page ii Woodard amp Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

10 INTRODUCTION

This Vertical Profiling and Monitoring Well Installation Plan (Plan) incorporates the results of several iterations and planning meetings between the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP) Group Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management (RIDEM) to define the Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan (LTMN Work Plan) for the West Kingston Town DumpUniversity of Rhode Island Disposal Area Superfund Site (WKURI Site) located in South Kingstown Rhode Island

This Work Plan has been developed to provide the rationale and specific details for the vertical profiling of the saturated zone criteria for selecting the monitoring well screen interval drilling and well installation details Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (DNAPL) Contingency Plan and the Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Plan in accordance with the requirements of the scope of work (SOW) described in the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) which was approved by RIDEM in August 2002 Upon approval of this Plan by RIDEM it will be integrated into a final LTMN Work Plan

The following sections reiterate the goals of the LTMN the current conceptual site understanding that was used to develop the LTMN and a detailed discussion of the proposed vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN Section 2 of this Work Plan describes the general methods and materials that will be used to implement the vertical profiling program Section 3 provides the specific locations and rationale for the monitoring well network The attachments include the seismic survey report details of the proposed groundwater and soil sampling methods monitoring well installation details on-site laboratory Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) DNAPL Contingency Plan IDW Plan and the RIDEM policy memo 95-01

11 PROJECT GOALS

The goal of the vertical profiling and installation of the LTMN for the WKURI Site is to both monitor and evaluate groundwater quality beneath the Site Specifically (he well network described in this Work Plan has been designed with the following two goals

1 This well network is designed to address data gaps in our current site understanding As discussed further in Subsection 12 field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to determine the nature and extent of groundwater plume and complete the site conceptual model To address these data gaps additional characterization is required in the following site areas

bull Investigate the bedrock and overburden aquifers upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the former drum disposal area

bull Complete three soil borings in and downgradient of the source area (eg Former Drum Storage Area)

bull Characterize the deep overburden aquifer downgradient of the landfill areas and

bull Based on the results of these investigations select monitoring well screen intervals and complete the installation of the entire LTMN

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 1 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

2 As required by the RIDEM landfill closure regulations the well network will be used as a compliance tool to monitor and track changes in groundwater water quality conditions necessary to evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the landfill caps The LTMN will consist of a series of new and existing overburden and bedrock monitoring wells that will serve this purpose and is described in further detail in Section 3

Once installed the LTMN will provide information on the groundwater quality across the site This is described further in Section 3

12 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL

Woodard amp Curran has developed a LTMN Work Plan based on our current site conceptual model including historic information the nature and distribution of site-related compounds site geology (seismic survey) and groundwater flow

121 Natural Site Setting

The following summarizes several studies that have been conducted in the area of the landfills between 1975 and 2003

Landfill and Areas West Subsurface geologic conditions are described as a moderately to highly permeable stratified-drift aquifer consisting of mostly sand and gravel underlain by a granite gneiss at depths ranging from 40 feet below the ground surface (bgs) directly east of the landfill areas to over 150 feet bgs in the vicinity of One Hundred Acre Pond [State of Rhode Island Water Resources Board (1975) the USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] Groundwater downgradient of and in the areas of the Landfill is approximately 30 feet bgs

Areas East of Landfills Geologic conditions change markedly directly east of the landfill areas The land surface rises from the Chipuxet River Plain (glacial outwash) up a hill directly east of the landfills This hill is created by approximately 20 to 30 feet of glacial till on top of bedrock [USGS (1985) NUS (1987) and WampC (2003)] The bedrock at the top of the hill is approximately 30 feet bgs while the water table was encountered at approximately six feet bgs in the late fall of 2003 (WampC 2003)

122 Nature and Distribution of Site-Related Contaminants

In accordance with the Final Work Plan for the Remedial Investigation at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site (Woodard amp Curran August 2002) and the Revised Scope of Work for the Supplemental URI Investigation (Woodard amp Curran April 2003) sampling of bedrock and overburden groundwater surface water sediment and pore water at the site was conducted in 20022003 The findings from these investigations were reported in the July 2003 Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan and are summarized below

1221 Groundwater

During two field investigations completed in December 2002January 2003 and May 2003 70 groundwater samples were collected from on-site and off-site locations using a GeoProbe sampling device The samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) In addition two bedrock residential wells (892 and 902 on Plains Road) were sampled for VOCs in June 2003 and one residential well was sampled in October 2003 (870 Plains Road) During the December 2002January 2003 GeoProbe investigation a site wide groundwater sampling event was conducted that included collection and analysis of 44 groundwater samples from

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 2 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

various depths (GP-01 through GP-21) In May 2003 a focused GeoProbe investigation was then conducted in the vicinity of the URI pond located to the east of FA4 which included collection and analysis of an additional 26 groundwater samples from various depths (GP-22 through GPshy39) The December 2002January 2003 groundwater samples and bedrock residential well samples were analyzed by a fixed laboratory using modified Method 8260B [he May analysis was conducted by a field laboratory using modified Method 8260B A summary of the groundwater sampling locations and results are depicted on Figure 1-1

An interpretive PCETCE plume for the overburden groundwater has been developed using the groundwater data collected to date as well as historical monitoring well data (ie GW-01 through GW-04) and is presented in Figure 1-2 This figure shows two interpretive plumes

Plume as of 2003 The green line is an interpretation of the current (2002 and 2003 data only) overburden PCETCE plume that exists at the site The plume extends from the former drum disposal area across the site through the URI pond and FA4 and toward Hundred Acre Pond

Plume as of late 1980s The blue line is an interpretation of groundwater conditions in the late 1980s when NUS and RTDEM sampled the four on-site monitoring wells (GWshy01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) At approximately this time the adjacent downgradient residential wells were also sampled The blue line uses only this historical data and does not consider the newer groundwater results

1222 Summary of Results

Based on these groundwater results it is apparent that a long narrow PCETCE plume currently exists at the site The suspected source of the plume is not the landfill areas but is upgradient of the landfill area In May of 2003 a supplemental investigation of the URI Pond was completed to determine if the pond was the source of PCETCE

123 URI Pond Investigation

Based on the groundwater and surface water data collected in December 2002 it was clear that an unidentified source other than the former landfill areas was creating a PCETCE groundwater plume In an attempt to identify the source of this contamination an investigation of the URI pond area was conducted in May of 2003 The results of this investigation are summarized below and conclude that the source of the PCETCE groundwater plume is not the URI Pond but is upgradient of the pond The current drilling program (described in this Work Plan) is designed to collect additional soil and groundwater samples from upgradient of the URI Pond and in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area in an attempt to identify the PCETCE source area

1231 Pore Water

As part of a supplemental investigation completed in May 2003 27 pore water samples were collected at the URI pond located to the east of FA4 as shown on Figure 1-1 This pore water sampling investigation was designed to evaluate elevated PCE and TCE concentrations detected at SWSD-01 in January 2002 It was suspected that groundwater flowing to the pond may be contaminated with PCETCE A GeoProbe groundwater investigation was completed in May of 2003 to investigate groundwater upgradient and downgradient of the pond Volatile organic compounds were detected in 18 out of 27 pore water samples and included PCE TCE and their breakdown products 12-DCA and cis-l2-DCE The pore water samples were analyzed by a field laboratory by modified Method 8260B This data indicates that the source of the PCETCE plume is an upgradient source suspected to be the Former Drum Storage Area

West KingstonAJRI Superfund Site Page 3 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

DATET(04 bull

TITLE De-Mfc V0(-f m DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

bull bull bull ~ ^K^i^Asect^^^

v- i -_bull V bull bull

TARGET SHEET

THE MATERIAL DESCRIBED BELOW WAS NOT SCANNED BECAUSE

(X) OVERSIZED MAP

0 NON-PAPER MEDIA

OOTHER

TITLE l Oelaquo- turj^ PtETlE DESCRIPTION

THE OMITTED MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW BY APPOINTMENT

AT THE EPA NEW ENGLAND SUPERFUND RECORDS CENTER BOSTON MA

|j|ipiv bull -

t

152500shy

152000shy

151500shy

151000shy

150500shy

150000shy

149500shy

Legend

149000shy 50 ~ feet above sea level

r 316000 316500 317000 317500 318000 318500 319000 319500 320000 320500 321000

Figure 1-3 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Originals in color Bedrock Surface Elevation Map

Feet Relative to Mean Sea Level Contour Interval 10 feet URI Landfill South Kingston RI

Site (ie URI pond) and then slopes sharply down towards the turf fields Depths to bedrock increase sharply from 30 feet bgs beginning immediately west of the URI ponds and plateau to 150 feet bgs below the turfs fields to the west of Plains Road The overburden layer ranging in thickness from 10 to 150 feet moving east to west across the site has been characterized as loose textured unsorted and unstratified sand with lesser amount of clay and gravel (RIDEM SOW October 2001) The interpreted water table is quite flat under the western side of the site (ie across Plains Road) and rises with the surface and bedrock topography to the east and becomes quite shallow (ie less than eight feet) in the vicinity of the Former Drum Storage Area

131 Summary of Results

The results of the seismic survey have been used to 1) develop the current site conceptual model 2) determine depth to bedrock and 3) identify zones of decreased bedrock velocity Lower velocity bedrock zones are possible fracture zones within the bedrock Proposed monitoring well locations are based upon the VOC sampling results collected to date and zones of low velocity (interpreted as fracture zones) In addition the seismic results were used to determine the depth to bedrock at each of the proposed drilling locations

14 SEQUENCE OF FIELD ACTIVITIES

The following describes the sequence of planned actions to complete the vertical aquifer profiling identify screen intervals and complete the installation of the LTMN Figure 1-4 presents proposed vertical profiling locations and existing and proposed groundwater monitoring locations

Step 1 - Work Plan

Before work can begin the final LTMN Work Plan must be approved by RIDEM and EPA

Step la Obtain concurrence with RIDEM and EPA regarding the details of the source area investigation the vertical aquifer profiling and subsequent monitoring well installation Finalize LTMN Work Plan The investigation will focus on two areas 1) Source Area Investigation and 2) Downgradient Dissolved Plume Profiling

Step 2 - Source Area Investigation

The first phase of the investigation will be to characterize the inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Because the area east of the URI Pond is dominated by till the inferred source may be contaminated soil The source area investigation includes both soil and groundwater sampling Soil sampling will be used in the overburden till because its naturally low permeability would make groundwater sampling by slotted augers impracticable Overburden groundwater samples will be collected once the overburden wells have been installed Groundwater samples will also be collected from the bedrock aquifer using packers in the open bedrock hole prior to selecting and installing the bedrock wells

Step 2a Conduct source area investigation The inferred source area will be investigated by collecting split-spoon soil samples from three soil borings (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) directly adjacent to and directly downgradient of the inferred source area Soil samples will be collected for VOC analysis using split-spoon samplers from the ground surface to the top of the bedrock at 5-foot intervals Soil samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12-cis-TCE and 12-DCA)

West KingstonUR] Superfund Site Page 8 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

OJ |U1|o

I I

ro gt

33

o NJ

enco

o -

CO C-J o

OJJen|o

TI

-0

CO 33 gt m ^ co

0 C P

s o TI o 33 33 zoo Z lt= TI

o gtlt z co Onginaism color

S^ -- m 330 -v j J

o z s o mO

8

O 00 gt m mdashi o

is idSo

f^

F CD C 33 O

Fo

WKURI LANDFILL

O

73

SOUTH KINGSTOWN Rl VERTICAL PROFILING LOCATIONS WOODARDampCURRAN

m VERTICAL PROFILE AND 1-ngirieeriMQ Science bull Operations MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PLAN DESIGNED BY CM CHECKED BY KDK

DRAWN BY PFF FILE 205540wipmwpltmn

Step 2b Based on the results of the soil sampling and analysis three new overburden monitoring wells (MW-1S MW-2S and MW-3S) will be installed The selected monitoring well screen interval (ie depth) will be in the zone with the highest VOCs soil concentrations

Step 2c Complete two bedrock explorations (MW-1B and MW-2B) to depths of approximately 80 feet bgs These explorations will be completed directly adjacent to VPshy1 and VP-2 using air-rotary drilling methods Therefore no overburden soil sampling will be required

Step 2d Complete down-hole geophysical investigation of 50 feet of open bedrock in each of the two open holes This will include temperature and caliper measurements and flowmeter logging Based on this information one or more fracture zones will be discreetly sampled using down-hole packers to isolate the zone of interest

Step 2e Based on the results of the geophysical investigation and groundwater results monitoring well screen depths will be selected in the zone with the highest reported VOCs concentrations If no VOCs are detected the screened interval will be selected as the zone with the greatest apparent flow

Step 3- Dissolved Plume Profiling

The second phase of the project will focus on the downgradient dissolved plume and long-term monitoring location around the existing solid waste areas Based on a review of the soil sampling completed by NUS in 1989 prior to installation of monitoring wells GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04 the subsequent groundwater samples collected from these wells there is a very poor correlation between soil screening results and subsequent groundwater sampling results from the monitoring wells (see NUS April 27 1990 Final Listing Site Inspection Report) (Note no sampling was completed during the installation of GW-01 the upgradient bedrock well) For example during the installation of GW-04 in 1989 15 soil samples were collected at five-foot intervals from the groundwater table to the top of bedrock approximately 94 feet bgs (see boring log in Appendix A of the 1990 NUS report) Each of these soil samples were analyzed on an on-site GC The results of these analyses are provided in Appendix B of this same report Relatively high VOC detections were reported at two depths in the 14 to 16 foot zone just below the water table at 13 feet bgs and a zone directly above the bedrock at 89 to 91 feet bgs The soil screening results indicated that the most significant VOC contaminant in the 89 to 91 foot zone was DCE TCE was also reported at a much lower relative concentration approximately 10 of the reported DCE concentration Therefore the screened interval for GW-04 was selected from 81 to 91 feet bgs However when this well was sampled in August of 1989 no DCE was reported but MEBK and TCE were reported MIBK was detected at 31 ug1 (drinking water criteria of 140 ug1) and TCE was reported at 6 ug1 just slightly above the drinking water standard of 5 ug1 However without the phantom DCE detection the well screen would have most likely been located at some other depth This apparent disconnect between the soil screening analysis and the groundwater result illustrates the need to not only carefully plan but also execute with appropriate QAQC To avoid this type of problemWampC is proposing the following key components of the vertical aquifer sampling

bull Use slotted auger in downgradient locations to collect groundwater screening samples Soil samples will be collected in the source area only and

bull Use on-site laboratory with appropriate QAQC (see Attachment D for on-site Laboratory SOP)

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 10 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Step 3a Obtain VOC groundwater results from the one upgradient (GW-01) and two existing downgradient wells (GW-02 and GW-03) at the site using low-flow sampling methods This data will augment our current understanding of overburden aquifer conditions

Step 3b Using hollow stem slotted auger sampling methods vertically profile (at 10shyfoot intervals) groundwater within the saturated zone at VP-4 VP-5 VP-6 VP-7 VP-8 VP-9 VP-10 and VP-11 Intervals within these areas that were previously sampled during the GeoProbe investigation will not be re-sampled This work was already completed to appropriate QAQC and is considered valid and representative of site conditions Groundwater samples will be analyzed for four target VOCs (TCE PCE 12shycis-TCE and 12-DCA) These four VOCs were the only site-related VOC reported above PQLs in previous two rounds of groundwater sampling

Step 3c Review the results of the dissolved plume vertical profiling Identify the zones with the highest dissolved VOC concentration in groundwater Select well screen intervals within these zones

Step 3d If none of the groundwater screening results collected during vertical profiling exceed drinking water criteria than the screened intervals will revert to the originally proposed screened intervals as presented in Table 3-1

The proposed LTMN installation schedule is attached as Figure 1-5

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 11 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

1

PROPOSED LTMN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE Figure 1-5

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area South Kingstown Rhode Island

ID

11

12

Task Name LTMN Plan

Preparation of Final LTMN

RIDEM LTMN Plan Approval

Bid Process

Preparation of Bid Package

Selection of Subcontractor

Budget

Finalize MW Budget

Town Council Meeting Approval

Field Work

Mobilization

Well Installations

Start Fri 072304

Fri 072304

Mon 072604

Mon 080204

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Mon 083004

Mon 083004

Mon 091304

Finish Mon 080904

Fri 072304

Mon 080904

Fri 081304

Mon 080204

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 081304

Mon 082304

Fri 102904

Mon 091304

Fri 102904

June Jj_u|y_ [August I September October November

0723

Figure 1-5 Final LTMN Schedulempp Page 1 Fri 072304

20 VERTICAL PROFILING PLAN

This section describes the drilling sample collection and monitoring well construction methods to be used during the vertical profiling of the groundwater monitoring well locations The purpose of the vertical profiling is to (1) investigate vadose zone and saturated soils in the Source Area and (2) identify the proposed monitoring well screens intervals Table 2-1 provides a summary of the existing and proposed monitoring wells

Table 2-1 Proposed and Existing Monitoring Wells

Proposed or Well Description and Purpose Aquifer Well ID Existing Monitored

Landfill Area FA2 Existing bedrock monitoring well located

GW-01 Existing upgradient of the landfill areas Long-term landfill Bedrock MW Existing monitoring well located directly north of

GW-02 Existing Overburden FA-2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located directly downgradient of

MW-6D Proposed Overburden FA2 Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located downgradient of FA2

MW-9 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW Overburden well located sidegradient of FA2 MW-10 Proposed Overburden Long-term landfill MW

Landfill Area FA4 and FAS

GW-03 Existing Downgradient of FA4 and FAS Long-term Landfill MW

Overburden

MW-1B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Bedrock

MW-1S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

MW-2B Proposed Bedrock well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW Bedrock

MW-2S Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of former drum storage area TCE Plume MW

Overburden

Overburden well located directly downgradient of MW-3S Proposed inferred source area (Former Drum Storage Area) Overburden

TCE Plume MW

MW-4D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-5D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-7S Proposed Shallow overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW Overburden

MW-7D Proposed Deep overburden well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Overburden

MW-8D Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Replace GW-04 long-term landfill MW

Overburden

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 13 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Well ID Proposed or

Existing Well Description and Purpose Aquifer

Monitored

MW-11 Proposed Overburden well located downgradient of FAS Long-term landfill MW

Overburden

R-870 Existing shyResidential

Existing deep bedrock well located downgradient of FA4 Both landfill and TCE plume MW

Bedrock

21 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS

Based on this evaluation and several meetings between the PRP Group RIDEM and EPA a plan for the installation of 14 new monitoring wells is proposed for the site Proposed well locations are presented on Figure 1-4 and listed in Table 2-1 summarizing the well location well purpose and aquifer monitored

The vertical profiling will be conducted at all of the proposed LTMN well locations negotiated with RID EM and EPA (Figure 1-4) The profiling will be completed from the groundwater table to bedrock Paired well locations MW-1SMW-1B MW-2SMW-2B and MW-7SMW-7D will only be profiled once in the deeper location Depth to bedrock was determined using existing borings (GW-01 GW-02 GW-03 and GW-04) the 1989 seismic survey (NUS) and the 2003 seismic survey (NGS) These results are summarized in Figure 1-3

WampC will verify that the auger refusal is bedrock and not a boulder or rock through comparison of the refusal with the bedrock depth determined by the seismic refraction survey completed in April of 2003 and from the previous wells installed at the property by NUS Corporation in 1989 Comparison of the bedrock depth generated from the seismic survey witli auger refusals encountered during installation of existing monitoring wells (NUS Corporation 1989) reveals ten to fifteen percent differences in elevation Therefore WampC will consider auger refusals within fifteen percent of the seismic survey bedrock depths as bedrock indicators Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed vertical profiling locations the estimated depth to bedrock at each location and the acceptable range of bedrock depth determined by auger refusal The 2002 seismic report including interpretive cross sections is provided in Attachment A

Table 2-2 Vertical Profile Summary

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

(feet bgs) VP-1 MW-1B and 5-foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-1S (MW- Is only) VP-2 MW-2B and 5 -foot soil 30 5 to 8 25 to 35

MW-2S (MW-2S only) VP-3 MW-3S 5-foot soil 22 10 to 15 15 to 25 VP-4 MW-4D 1 0-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-5 MW-5D 10-foot GW 155 28 to 33 143 to 167 VP-6 MW-6D 1 0-foot GW 150 28 to 33 127 to 172 VP-7 MW-7S and 1 0-foot GW 145 34 to 38 134 to 156

MW-7D

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 14 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical Monitoring Proposed Depth of Depth to Acceptable Profile Well Area Sampling Bedrock Groundwater Range of

ID Interval Identified by (feet bgs) Bedrock Seismic Depth (feet) Survey

VP-8 MW-8D 1 0-foot GW (feet bgs)

94 15 to 20 80 to 108 VP-9 MW-9S 1 0-foot GW 125 10 to 14 115 to 134

VP-10 MW-10 10-foot GW 35 8 to 12 30 to 40 VP-11 MW-11 1 0-foot GW 145 28 to 33 134 to 156

Note 1 - NUS recorded bedrock at 935 feet bgs

22 SELECTION OF DRILLING AND SAMPLING METHODS

Based on subsurface conditions historical information and requirements requested by PJDEM and EPA the following drilling and sampling methods were reviewed Based on this review soil sampling within the Source Area will be completed by standard five-foot split-spoon soil sampling Soil sampling was selected to provide information (soil data) from the inferred source area

However downgradient of the landfills in the dissolved groundwater plume vertical profiling of the groundwater will be completed using the hollow-stem slotted augers method This technique was selected as the most likely method to be successful at this site The following is a review of available drilling sampling and analytical methods In addition if DNAP1 is encountered during the bedrock drilling activities the DNAPL contingency plan provided in Attachment E will be implemented

Investigation derived waste (DDW) will be managed in accordance with PJDIiM IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended for project requirements in the site-specific EDW plan provided in Attachment F In general soil cutting will be stock piled without sampling in areas where they will be covered by the planned landfill cap and IDW fluids (ie drilling fluids excess sampling water and decontamination water) will be collected in large plastic storage tanks until analysis demonstrates that this water may be discharged to the surface or requires treatment prior to discharge or off-site disposal

221 Exploration Methods

Based on past drilling experience and known geologic conditions the following exploration methods were reviewed and considered for vertical aquifer sampling and monitoring well installation Included in this review were the following drilling technologies

bull Direct Push Technologies bull Drive-and-Wash bull Mud Rotary bull Air Hammer bull Hollow Stem Augers - Soil Sampling bull Hollow Stem Augers - Groundwater Sampling and bull Sonic Drilling

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 15 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

The results are summarized below In the end a combination of several methods has been retained and will be used to address site specific geologic conditions and sampling requirements These methods are summarized in Table 2-3 Retained technologies are briefly described below

Table 2-3 Technologies Reviewed for Vertical Profiling

Exploration Method

Overburden Drilling Direct Push Technologies (GeoProbe)

CPT

Waterloo Sampler

Drive-and-Wash Casing

Mud Rotary

Hollow Stem Auger shySoil Sampling

Hollow Stem Auger mdash Groundwater Sampling

Sonic Drilling

Bedrock Drilling Air Hammer

Advantages

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Cost effective collects from soil and GW

Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones

Less costly than driveshyand-wash Capable of penetrating cobble and boulder zones Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative soil samples Cost effective and proven ability to collect representative groundwater samples Ability to penetrate soil and boulder to depths of greater than 200 feet Obtains continuous soil core

Penetrates soil and rock

Disadvantages

Max depths = 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock

Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Max depths up to 100 ft bgs cannot penetrate cobbles or bedrock Costly and large volumes of water needed Could result in washing out contamination ahead of drill stem Most regulatory agency will not approve application because of mud Open end augers may not successfully penetrate 150 feet of sand and gravel Unable to collect soil through closed ended augers May not penetrate boulder zone High cost per foot Over twice as expense when compared to augers

Unable to collect undisturbed soil GW or rock samples (Note GW samples will be collected after drilling with packers)

Retained

Yes - was used in 20022003 GW investigation of upper 100 feet of overburden aquifer No - no advantage over GeoPiobe

No - no advantage over GeoProbe

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by wash water

No - Sample integrity could he compromised by mud

Yes - used to collect soil sample in till soils

Yes - used to collect groundwater samples in deep sand and gravel formation No- cost prohibitive Is designed for soil sampling but cumbersome for GW sampling

Yes - will be used for the bedrock wells coupled with down-hole geophysics to investigate rock and collect bedrock GW samples

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 16 of25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

222 Overburden Drilling

The following drilling methods were evaluated for vertical profiling

Direct Push Technologies - Three different types of direct push technologies were evaluated GeoProbe (successfully used at the site in 2002 and 2003) Cone Penetrometer (CPT) and the Waterloo Sampler As stated GeoProbe rig was successfully used to collect over 70 groundwater samples from the upper 100 feet of the overburden aquifer in 20022003 field investigations However this technology was limited to the upper 100 feet resulting in up to a 50-foot zone of sand and gravel (directly above bedrock) where samples were not collected While this technology was successful it was determined that additional attempts would be unsuccessful and that an alternative method of collecting samples from below 100 feet bgs is needed Based on discussions with CPT and Waterloo contractors neither was optimistic about obtaining depths of up to 150 feet bgs in this formation An additional disadvantage of direct push technologies is that the long-term monitoring wells would have to be installed using a different method in effect doubling the drilling efforts Therefore this profiling method is not being proposed to fill the existing data existing data gaps

Hollow Stem Auger - In general overburden drilling can be completed using two separate hollow stem auger drilling techniques (1) standard split-spoon soil sampling and (2) slotted auger groundwater sampling The advantages of hollow stem auger drilling are that representative soil and groundwater samples may be collected during the installation of the overburden monitoring wells This has significant cost saving for monitoring wells which are then installed in boreholes used also to collect samples The disadvantage is that soil sampling at depths over 100 feet bgs in loose sands and gravels is often unsuccessful While NUS was successful in collecting soil samples using hollow stem augers in 1987 all of the drilling contractors we spoke with were unwilling or reluctant to attempt this type of open auger drilling at these depths They feared blow in would lock their augers in-place making it impossible to extract the augers from the subsurface In addition based on the NUS drilling logs it took over a week to complete this exploration and install GW-04 to 140 feet bgs

bull Split-Spoon Soil Sampling Hollow-stem split-spoon soil sampling will be limited to till soils where blow in is not a problem at profiling locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 (MWshy1S MW-2S and MW-3S) The goal of soil sampling east of the landfills is to identify the likely source area of the VOC (ie PCE and TCE) groundwater plume Because of the till soils in this area the GeoProbe was unable to penetrate depths greater than 15 feet of the overburden Bedrock in the area is estimated at approximately 30 feet bgs Soil samples will be collected at five-foot intervals from the ground surface to the bedrock surface

bull Slotted Auger Sampling A specially designed slotted lead auger will be used to collect groundwater samples at the remaining locations (VP-4 through VP-11) The lead slotted auger is similar to a standard lead auger with the following exceptions the slotted auger is manufactured with very thin slots cut into the sides of the auger This allows groundwater to flow from outside to the inside of the auger as it is advanced into the subsurface The auger is also closed at the end with a disposable cap that keeps soil from entering the end of the augers The advantages of using a slotted auger include ability to collect representative groundwater samples and because the end of the augers remain closed there is little danger of blow-in therefore increasing the likelihood of successfully completing each of the depth explorations to the bedrock surface

West KingstonUK] Superfund Site Page 17 of 25 Woodard amp Cumin Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel or PVC Kemmer Bottle discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer bottle is lowered in the open position to within three feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the lab

bull Monitoring Well Construction One of the great advantages of using hollow-stem augers (both split-spoon sampling and slotted augers) is that upon completion of the boring a two-inch polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well can than be constructed as the auger is extracted (see Monitoring well construction SOP in Attachment C) This minimizes costs because the soil boring and monitoring wells are completed in only one advancement of the drilling tools

Sonic Drilling - Sonic drilling technology is a fairly new method of advancing six-inch steel casing without the use of water or air It has been proven to be successful in a number of difficult drilling environments where conventional techniques were proven to be unsuccessful Sonic drilling involves a specially designed drilling rig that uses a sonic head to vibrate drill casing through the subsurface The advantages of Sonic drilling include its ability to collect continuous cores through soil and boulders The disadvantages of Sonic include high cost per foot and the overall size of the drill rig requires wide open and flat drilling locations

bull Soil Sampling - A continuous soil core is collected within the six-inch drill casing as it is advanced Soil is brought to the surface by an inner casing core insuring representative soil samples and

bull Groundwater Sampling - Groundwater samples may be collected using an elaborate packer and retractable well screen However this is not cost-effective for continuous 10shyfoot groundwater sampling

223 Bedrock Drilling

A preliminary evaluation eliminated all other types of bedrock drilling except an air hammer coupled with down-hole geophysics and packed groundwater sampling

Air Hammer - Air rotary (or air hammer) technology is very common in the residential water well industry The advantages include cost-effective penetration of bedrock However this technology is not designed to collect undisturbed environmental samples Therefore it has often been coupled with down-hole geophysical methods to characterize bedrock and collect representative bedrock groundwater samples (see below) Two bedrock wells coupled with two overburden wells (MW-1SMW-1B and MW-2SMW-2B) will be installed directly east of the landfill areas and directly downgradient of the former drum disposal area (see Figure 1-4) During installation of the bedrock wells the overburden will not be characterized The overburden will be characterized during the installation of the overburden wells using standard 425-inch hollow stem augers (see below)

23 DOWN-HOLE GEOPHYSICAL METHODS

Following completion of drilling of the bedrock borehole geophysics will be completed to identify potential fractures and to assist in the placement of the screened interval for the well construction Temperature caliper and heat pulse flowmeter measurements will be made in each of the bedrock wells as described below

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 18 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

bull Temperature and Caliper Measurements Each borehole will be initially logged with a combination temperature and three-armed caliper tool Temperature (in degrees Celsius) will be measured going down the hole Areas where water is entering or exiting the borehole may be revealed on the temperature log as abrupt temperature changes or sometimes as temperature gradient changes Caliper measurements which measure the borehole diameter are made coming up the hole Fractures are often revealed on the caliper log as abrupt widening of the borehole The geophysical logs will be examined and likely bedrock fractures will be identified This information is used to then select measurement locations for the heat-pulse flowmeter instrument Generally flowmeter measurements are taken above and below likely fractures in each of the boreholes

bull Flowmeter Logging Measurements of the natural ambient vertical and under pumping conditions water flow will be made in each borehole over the entire un-cased saturated bedrock bore hole using a heat pulse flowmeter This instrument is capable of measuring flow direction (up or down) and has a calibrated measurement range of 10 to 003 gallons per minute (gpm) Vertical flow in a borehole is caused under natural flow conditions when two or more transmissive fractures in a borehole are at hydraulic disequilibrium with one another When this occurs there is a hydraulic gradient developed and water will flow toward the fracture with the lower hydraulic head

A composite geophysical log of each of the boreholes will be made and appended to the written report This composite log will show possible bedrock fracture locations in each borehole The flowmeter results will also be shown on this log This information will be used to select groundwater sampling intervals within the packered open bedrock hole If based on these results additional information is needed passive diffusion sampling devices may be used

24 VERTICAL PROFILE SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The following outlines how samples will be collected and analyzed during the vertical aquifer profiling prior to well installation

241 Sample Collection

The following provides a discussion of how soil and groundwater samples will be collected As discussed in Section 23 two methods of collecting samples in the overburden are proposed split-spoons for soils and slotted augers for groundwater As with any drilling technique there are limitations for both methods The discriminating factors are What are the goals or data quality objectives (DQOs) for the proposed sampling What is the purpose of the sampling What is the intended end use of the data

Source Area - Soil Sampling The purpose of the vertical profiling in the source area is to identify the source of the PCETCE plume and select the monitoring well screened interval within each exploration Horizontal well locations have already been identified based on previous site work The advantage of collecting soil samples includes a visual identification of soil type (eg sand slit or clay) and split-spoon sample collection is relatively inexpensive Soil sampling is appropriate in the source area (and directly downgradient VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) where the goal is to identify contaminated soil it is not appropriate downgradient where low concentrations of VOCs are dissolved in groundwater (not soil) In addition analytical soil detection limits are 10 times greater than those for groundwater Therefore in areas of low concentration such as the downgradient dissolved plume area soil samples will not be collected

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 19 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Vertical soil profiling will be conducted at locations VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3 as part of the source area investigation The vertical profiling of the overburden material at these locations will be conducted by completing five foot interval split-spoon sampling from the ground surface to the top of bedrock The goal of this sampling will be to identify the source of the VOCs

Slotted Auger Sampling The purpose of vertical aquifer sampling west of the landfill areas is to determine the zone of highest VOC concentrations in groundwater This zone will then be identified as the screened interval for the proposed monitoring well location Outside of the source area (VP-1 VP-2 and VP-3) the vertical profile sampling is focused on the dissolved downgradient plume In general it appears that the groundwater VOC concentrations detected downgradient of the landfill areas would be below soil detection limits Therefore soil sampling would not benefit the overall well construction process

242 Sample Analyses

The following describes how collected soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed to meet project objectives

Soil Analysis Soil samples collected for VOC screening analysis will be collected from the split-spoons using EPA Method 5035A methanol preservation These samples will be sent to an off-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation criteria The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported from the screening analysis (PCE TCE

cis-l2-DCE and 12-DCA) Based on the extensive groundwater sampling conducted by WampC during 20022003 only these four VOCs were reported at levels above their respective PQLs (detection limits)

Table 2-4 lists the respective screening level PQLs for soil

Table 2-4 Soil Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Soil Screening PQL (ugkg) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 100 Trichloroethene (TCE) 100 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12- 100 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 100

Groundwater Analysis Groundwater samples will be collected using slotted augers and analyzed for VOCs by modified Method 8260B Water samples will be collected from the slotted augers using a discrete grab sampling device (eg Kemmer Bottle) Samples will be analyzed at an on-site laboratory for 24-hour turn-around VOC screening analysis by a modified Method 8260B The analysis will be run at an Analytical Level I The results will be reviewed and evaluated at

West KingstonURl Superfund Site Page 20 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

an EPA Region 1 Tier I data evaluation The analysis will in general follow the laboratory SOP for 8260B analysis as provided in Attachment D with the following exceptions

1 Calibration will be conducted once every 24-hours at a minimum 2 Samples that exceed the quantification limit will be reported as estimated instead of

diluting and re-running the sample 3 Surrogates will not be added or reported 4 Four indicator compounds will be reported in the screening analysis (PCE TCE cis-12shy

DCE andl2-DCA)

Table 2-5 lists their respective screening level PQLs for groundwater

Table 2-5 Groundwater Screening Compounds and PQLs

Compound Water Screening PQL (ug1)

Tetrachloroethene (PCE) 5 Trichloroethene (TCE) 5 Cis-l2-Dichloroethene (cis-12shy 5 DCE) 12-Dichloroethane (12-DCE) 5

25 SELECTION OF MONITORING WELL SCREEN DEPTHS

Based on the results of the vertical profiling the permanent monitoring well screen intervals will be selected based on the highest VOC screening concentrations reported within each boring where practicable Screening level VOC results will be faxed to the PRP Group and RIDEM on a daily basis The monitoring well screen interval will be placed to include the interval of maximum VOC screening level reported where practicable In general well screens will be 10 feet in length RIDEM andor EPA will be contacted for concurrence only if a screened interval is proposed that for some other technical reason (ie poor groundwater purge rate) does not coincide with the interval of highest VOC screening results

As stated in previous correspondence to RIDEM subsurface conditions at the site represent the very limits of hollow-stem auger drilling capabilities There is great concern from all drilling contractors consulted that their down-hole equipment be removed as quickly as possible once they reach refusal Therefore augers will not be allowed to remain in the ground for longer than 12 hours (less if running sands are encountered) once refusal is reached If no VOCs are reported above the drinking water standards within the profile then the screened interval selected will be the intervals presented in Table 3-2

26 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION

Equipment that comes into contact with sample media will be decontaminated The decontamination procedures will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements by WampCs Standard Operating

West KJngstonURI Superfund Site Page 21 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

Procedure for Equipment Decontamination at the West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site as presented in Attachment F

In general WampC will containerize all liquids generated during the drilling program (eg drilling water excess sampling water and well development water) as well as decontamination water WampC will construct a central decontamination pad to be used for equipment cleaning All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

It is anticipated that the total volume of EDW fluid will exceed 250 gallons Once a tank becomes full subsequent IDW fluids will be directed to the second tank The full tank wil l be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l in Attachment F Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria If results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQI s the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW will be discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland

West KingstonURJ Superfund Site Page 22 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

30 PROPOSED MONITORING WELL NETWORK

A total of 18 monitoring wells are being proposed for the monitoring well network at the WKURI site Fourteen new monitoring wells will be installed to complement the three existing on-site wells (ie GW-01 GW-02 and GW-03) and on off-site residential wells (870) Together these wells will form the LTMN for the WKURI Site1 The network of wells will serve two functions

1 Compliance wells for post-closure monitoring for the landfills

2 Plume monitoring wells for additional characterization and long-term monitoring of the PCETCE plume

The proposed locations of the LTMN are presented in Figure 1-4 Well installation details including well identifications depths and screened intervals and well materials are summarized in Table 3-1 Monitoring well GW-04 previously installed at the site in the 1980s is not being considered for inclusion in the LTMN because this well cannot be located and has likely been inadvertently destroyed However MW-8D is proposed in a similar location

The following sections describe the types and locations for the new and existing groundwater monitoring wells proposed for the site and the rationale for the selection and placement of these wells as long-term compliance monitoring wells and plume monitoring wells This LTMN has been developed to be consistent with the RIDEM SOW and regulations for solid waste landfills and groundwater quality monitoring

31 COMPLIANCE MONITORING WELLS

Monitoring wells will be necessary to evaluate the protectiveness of the landfill cover systems to protect groundwater quality The subsections below describe the network of wells developed to monitor groundwater quality at the two site landfill areas the Town landfill areas (FA2FA3) and the URI landfill areas (FA4FA5FA1)

Town Landfill Areas (FA2 and FA3)

Seven monitoring wells will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the longshyterm protectiveness of the cap at FA2 located on the southern portion of the site on the Tibbits property (see Figure 1-4) Based on the preliminary cap design it is anticipated that FA3 will be excavated and consolidated into FA2 prior to constructing the landfill cap

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for these areas consists of the following wells

GW-01 MW-2S MW-6D MW-10 GW-02 MW-2B MW-9

The wells and their function for FA2 are summarized in Table 3-1

(1) Note that (as negotiated with RIDEM) proposed monitoring well MW-8D will not be installed if vertical profiling does not reveal an impact to groundwater above drinking water standards

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 23 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

TABLE 3-1 PROPOSED LONG-TERM MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DETAILS

Well Depth Screened Interval Well Material

Existing Overburden Bedrock Total Well Screen Screened bull Screen Slot MWID Proposed Strata Depth (bgs) Depth (bgs) Depth Length (ft) Interval (ft bgs) Screen Size Riser

Existing Monitoring Wells

GW-01 Existing Bedrock 15 25 25 5 15-20 PVC NA PVC

GW-02 Existing Overburden 128 128 10 118- 128

GW-03 Existing Overburden 91 91 10 81 -91 PVC NA PVC

Proposed Monitoring Wells

MW-1R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-1S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2R Proposed Bedrock 30 50 80 10 TBD PVC 0010 PVC

MW-2S Proposed Overburden 30 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-3S Proposed Overburden 22 22 10 12-22 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-4D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-5D Proposed Overburden 155 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-6D Proposed Overburden 150 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7S Proposed Overburden 145 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-7D Proposed Overburden 145 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-8D Proposed Overburden 94 70 10 60-70 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-9S Proposed Overburden 125 50 10 40-50 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-10 Proposed Overburden 35 30 10 20-30 PVC 0010 PVC

MW-11 Proposed Overburden 145 100 10 90-100 PVC 0010 PVC

Residential Bedrock Wells

870 Plains Rd Existing Bedrock NA NA 160 NA NA Open Hole Open Bedrock 6 STEEL

Notes (1) II based on groundwater VOC results there is no VOC reported above drinking water standards the monitoring well will be installed at the intervals listed above - = not applicable MW = Monitoring Well ft bgs = ft below ground surface R = bedrock well O = shallow overburden welf D = deep overburden well NA = Not Available PVC = polyvmyl chlonde TBD = To Be Determined Bedrock well amp screened interval will be installed following completion geophysics (caliper flow meter) on open borehole

Page 24 of 25 West KingstonURI Superfund Site Woodard Curran Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

URI Landfill Areas (FA4 FAS and FA1)

Eleven monitoring wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality and evaluate the long-term protectiveness of the cap on the northern portion of the site on the URI property (see Figure 1-4)

The groundwater quality monitoring well network for the URI landfill areas is summarized in Table 3-1 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1B MW-7S MW-11 GW-03 MW-4D MW-7D 870 Plains Road MW-1S MW-5D MW-8D

32 PLUME MONITORING WELLS

Thirteen monitoring wells will be used to further refine the nature and extent of groundwater contamination at the site and provide long-term monitoring locations for the PCETCE plume The plume monitoring well network is summarized in Table 3-1 and Figure 1-3 and includes the following wells

GW-01 MW-1S MW-2B MW-5D 870 Plains Road GW-02 MW-1B MW-3S MW-7S GW-03 MW-2S MW-4D MW-7D

The interpretive overburden PCETCE plume for the site is presented on Figure 1-4 Field investigations completed to date have identified the presence of PCE and TCE in the URI pond surface water and overburden groundwater on the eastern portion of the URI site Therefore additional groundwater data is required to complete the Site Conceptual Model and determine the nature and distribution of the plume To address these data gaps and define the inferred extent of upgradient and downgradient ends of the plume additional characterization of groundwater quality is required at three areas 1) upgradient of the URI pond and downgradient of the drum disposal area 2) the bedrock aquifer downgradient of the drum disposal area and 3) the potential for TCEPCE groundwater contamination to the Hundred Acre Pond

West KingstonURI Superfund Site Page 25 of 25 Woodard amp Curran Revised Vertical Profiling Plandoc July 2004

ATTACHMENT A

Seismic Survey

Northeast Geophysical Services

Figure 1

SEISMIC LINE LOCATION MAP W KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE SOUTH KINGSTOWN RI

A Sag 2 -bull V

Scale 1 Inch =300 Feet

Originals in color j

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line A

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i 1 i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i 1 i i i M I i bull i i i i i i i I ii i i i i i i i I i i i i i i 1 1 1 1 L i i i i I ii i i i i i p 175 175

West East 150 H h 150

I Al 2 24 E 17 W C 19 20 21 22 23B raquo D 2 3 A-a W V 9 r _ ~_ t Jiplusmn i 4

125 H 12 ^laquo^ 14 15 JsL 17 19 D 20 I- 125 Unsaturated OverburtJen (1353 fps)

100 H I- 100

75 H Saturated Overburden (5292 fps) I- 75

S 50 I- 50

bullbull ~ bullas h 25 I

3

o H h 0

-25 H h- -25

-so H h -50

-75 H h -75

-100 -100 T I

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINEAVertical exaggeration ~ i Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

I South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

I

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i I i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i bull i i I i i j i i I i i i i i i i i i I i 175

South North 150 - - 150

I IS E 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 F 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 B 1 2 3 4

i 125 - - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1457 fps) 100 - - 100

75 - - 75

pound 50- - 50 d2 Saturated Overburden (5284 fps)

- 25 I raquo- 0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy

-100 [ i i i i i i i i i | t -100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i i

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-1 Vertical exaggeration Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by For Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line B-2

I r~

1

175

150

125

1

shy

shy

0

i i i i i i I i

South

Al

i i

2

i i i

3

i i

4

100

i I i i i

S

i i i i i

6

200

i I i i i

7

i i i i i

8

300

i I i

B

i i

9

i i i

400

i i i I i

10

500 600

i i i i i i i i I bull i I i i i i i i

11 12 C 13 14 IS 16

Unsaturated Overburden (1544 fps)

i i

D

700

i I i

17 18

800

19

20

900 1000 1100

I i i i L^I i i I i i i i i

North

21 22 23 24E

-

-

175

150

125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

I

pounda o

bullbullO laquosect5W

50 H

~f 25 H

Saturated Overburden (5380 fps) - 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-loo -H

100 200 300 400 500Distance (feet)

600 700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

I Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21 SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE B-2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

Originals in color South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40103 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

I

Interpretive Profiie

Seismic Refraction Line C-1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100

175 1 i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i I i i I l l 175

West East 150 shy

- 150

1 B 1 2 I g g 9 10 11 12 13 D 14 15 16 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24F 125 shy gE- - 125

Unsaturated Overburden (1401 fps) 100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

50 - Saturated Overburden (5182 fps) - 50

I - 25 w

0 shy - 0

-25 shy- -25

-50 shy- -50

-75 shy- -75

-100 n i i I 100

500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Distance (feet)

i Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-1

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21

Original in color WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line C-2

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 175 i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i lt i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I i i i _bull I i i i i i i i i t I i i i i 175

West East 150 shy - 150

125 shy Unsaturated Overburden (1219 fps) 18 D19 20 21 22 raquoJSI - 125

100 shy9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 1SD19 20 21 22 23BraquoE22 3

y y 4

v 5 6 C 7 8 9 10 11 12

-100

75 shy -75 Saturated Overburden (5224 fps)

Sa

so H -50

2bullbullgt laquofc

S 25 H -25

o H - 0

-25 shy --25

-50 shy--50

-75 shy--75

-100 i i i i i i i i | i i i i i i i -100

-100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Distance (feet)

I Vertical exaggeration SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE C-2

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone 21 WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP

URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE Originals in color

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40303 by For Northeast Geophysical Services Woodard amp Curran

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 1

175

ISO shy

0

i i i I i i

South

i i i i i i

100

i I i i i i- i i i i

200

i I i i i i i i i i

300

i I i i i i i i i i

400

i I i i

500

i I i i i i i_ i i i

600

i I i i

700

i I i i i i i i i i

800

i I i i i

900

i 1 i bull i i i i

1000

i plusmn i I i i i i i i

1100

i i i I i

North

175

- 150

125 shy B 1 2 3 E 17 18 19 20 21 22 23B_24

- 125

100 shyUnsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

- 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3 a

50

25

shy

shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

100 200 300 400 500 600 Distance (feet)

700 800 900 1000 1100

-100

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone Vertical exaggeration

21

gt Original in color

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 1

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

For Surveyed 40203 by Woodard amp Curran Northeast Geophysical Services i

Interpretive Profile

Seismic Refraction Line D Segment 2

175

1100

i I i

1200

i i raquo i I i

1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i I I i i I i i I I I i i i I I I I i i i i i i I i i i i i i i i i I ^

2000

bull I I

2100 2200

I bull 175

150 shy

125 shy

South

1 F 2 8 C 9 10 11 12 D 13 15

Unsaturated Overburden (1433 fps)

16 E 17 18 19 20

North

23 MF

- 150

- 125

100 shy - 100

75 shy - 75

a bull3

50 shy

Saturated Overburden (5499 fps)

- 50

- 25

0 shy - 0

-25 shy - -25

-50 shy - -50

-75 shy - -75

-100

1100 1200 1300 1400

Possible Low Velocity Bedrock Zone

1500 1600 1700 Distance (feet)

Vertical exaggeration 21

1800 1900

Originals in color

2000

-100

2100

SEISMIC REFRACTION LINE D SEG 2

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMP URI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

South Kingstown RI

Surveyed 40203 by

Northeast Geophysical Services For

Woodard amp Curran

ATTACHMENT B

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR GROUNDWATER AND SOIL SAMPLING AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Cuitan Inc

Groundwater and Soil Sampling SOP

A description of the drilling and sample collection methods is provided below

Hollow Stem Auger Drilling

bull Decontaminate the drill rig and drilling equipment as prescribed in the August 2002 QAPP SOP for equipment decontamination

bull Set-up the drill rig over the intended boring location

bull Attach a lead auger equipped with auger teeth to the drill rig The augers will measure five feet in length and have an 8-inch outer diameter (4 i inch inner diameter)

bull Drill the auger into the ground using a combination of rotation and downward pressure

bull As an auger flight nears the ground surface (every five feet) attach an additional flight of augers with bolts or pins to the previous and continue drilling

bull Drill cuttings carried upward to the ground surface along the outside of the borehole will be handled as described in the IDW Management Plan_(see Attachment F and G)

Groundwater Sampling through Slotted Auger (at 10 foot intervals)

bull The lead auger will be slotted over approximately 4 feet of its length to allow groundwater infiltration into the inner portion of the hollow stem augers A disposable knock-out plug will be fitted to the open end of the lead auger to keep soil from entering the augers During well construction this plug will be pushed off the end of the augers and will remain in the hole to allow for well construction

bull When the lead slotted auger reaches the desired depth the drilling drive head will be disconnected to allow access to the inside of the augers A water level meter will be used to measure the depth to the water inside the augers

bull Groundwater samples will be collected from within the slotted auger using a stainless steel Kemmer Bottle or similar discrete water sampler Once the auger has reached the desired depth the Kemmer Bottle is lowered in the open position to within 3 feet of the bottom of the drill casing Once at depth a messenger is sent down the wire line to strike the samplers and close the bottle The bottle is then retrieved to the surface and the water sample is transferred to VOA vials for transport to the laboratory

bull Water samples will be collected at ten foot intervals but not from intervals previously completed during the 2002 and 2003 GeoProbe sampling

bull Samples will be collected into laboratory supplied glassware

B-l

Split-Spoon Soil Sampling (at 5-foot intervals)

bull Augers will be advanced to the required sample depth as described above

bull During advancement of the auger either a split spoon sampler or removable center plug (pilot bit) is attached to the drill rods or wire line with a down-hole hammer and placed at the bottom of the lead auger to prevent soil material from entering the augers

bull Assemble the decontaminated split-spoon sampler consisting of a hardened steel shoe for driving and a split-barrel (24 inch long 15 inch inside diameter)

bull Lower the split-spoon sampler into the ground through the center of the hollow stem augers or by wire line with down-hole hammer to the top of the sample interval

bull Mark the drill rods or wire with six-inch intervals for blow count collection

bull Advance the sampler using the standard penetration test (ie 30 inch vertical drop of a 140-pound hammer) Drive the sampler 24 inches and record the blows per six inch interval

bull Retrieve the sampler to the ground surface and split open to expose the sample

bull Scan the sample for VOCs using a PDD and measure the length of the material recovered

bull Collect a soil sample in laboratory supplied jars and store for shipment to the analytical laboratory

bull Decontaminate the sampler for the next sample interval

B-2

ATTACHMENT C

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

Monitoring Well Installation SOP

Overburden Wells

1 Advance the borehole to the required depth using a bit or auger flight of a diameter sufficient to allow for insertion of the tremie pipe The depth will be determined based on vertical profiling results (Sections 22 and 23 of the LTMN Work Plan) The final completion depth should be sounded with a decontaminated weighted tape before continuance of well placement

2 Make up the screen for installation Tighten joints

3 Lower the screen and riser into the drill casing

4 Install the filter pack by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the in-side of the drill casing Two to 6 inches of filter pack material may be placed at the bottom of the hole under the screen Filter pack will be extended to three to five feet above the top of the screen

5 Check the depth to the top of the filter pack with a weighted tape

6 Tremie or for shallow wells (lt35 feet) gravity feed bentonite onto the top of the filter pack

7 Pure bentonite grout (Volclay or equivalent) will be used as the annular seal grout will be mixed with water in accordance with manufacturer specifications For shallow wells (lt35 feet) granular bentonite may be substituted for grout

8 If grout is used tremie the grout into the annulus using a tremie pipe Slowly withdraw the tremie pipe as the annulus fills Grout the well to ground surface Compare actual volume of grout placed with calculated volume Both should be annotated in the field logbook

9 After installing grout dismantle and clean tremie equipment

10 Install protective casing and finish the concrete pad so that it slopes away from the wellhead in all directions Add approximately 15 foot of grout to the inside of the protective casing Add approximately 15 foot of filter sand above the grout inside the protective casing Drill a weep hole through one wall of the protective casing within the sand layer Lock the well cover

11 In high traffic areas well design may specify guard posts If so dig the holes and set the guard posts Posts should extend to a depth of two feet bgs

12 Record the appropriate constructioncompletion information in the field logbook and monitoring well installation form

13 Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened intervalFigure C-l provides installation details for a typical overburden well

c-i

Bedrock Wells

Bedrock wells will be installed using a similar method described above however an air hammer will be used to advance the borehole approximately 50 feet into the bedrock The bedrock well if required will be installed following the completion of the borehole geophysics to determine the appropriate interval for the well screen using the following method

1 Conduct geophysical testing

2 Use drilling information and the results of the geophysical testing to select the screened interval for the bedrock well Screened interval will have a minimum How rate of 100 mlmin An alternative method is to leave an open bedrock hole with no well screen

3 Place sand and then bentonite pellets in the rock boring to within three feet of the bottom of the proposed well screen depth

4 Add sand over the bentonite to the desired bottom of the screen depth

5 Add well screen and riser

6 Add sand to three to five feet above the screen by poring the sand into the annular space between the well riser and the drill casing

7 Tremie in grout if the top of the sand pack is greater than 35 feet bgs dd grout to the ground surface

8 The steel casing will remain in place

9 The steel casing will be extended above the ground surface and designed as the protective casing Add sand pack to approximately 15 foot above ground surface inside the protective casing and drill a weep hole as described above Wells will be marked inside and outside of the casing with permanent stamped metal tags Tags will be embossed with the well identification installation data depth and screened interval

Figure C-2 provides installation details for a typical bedrock well

C-2

bullbullbull

4^ Padlock 6-inch Steel

rotective Casing Well Cap ^

^tgt bull lt bull ^ lt feX v lt7 bull 4

3 vyy

x^ -

-7 -bull -

-

1-

bull^ - bull pound

bull V

bull

^ | --

|i

1 |

^ bull -y

y

s y i

X7 -bull gty

Vy bull bull

X

bull f

bullx

1 1

f

bull- mdash 8 - -gt

Not to Scale

~V

2IDSch40PVCRiser if gt100bgsSch80PVC

Appendix C Figure C-1 Typical Overburden Well Construction Diagram

Response to RlOEMs March 2 2004 Letter West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island WOODARDampCURRAN

205540wipmonitoring well plariispring 2004Figure 1 overburden wellrev O30904cnv

Protective Cover shy

Well Cap shy

Weep Hole

OVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

Bedrock Fracture

Bedrock Fracture

Not to Scale

Padlock

Sand

Ground Surface

- Top of Bedrock

- 4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 inlo Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

_ 2 Schedule 40 PVC Riser ifgt100bgsSch80PVC

Type 0 or 00 Sand Pack

0010 Slot or 0007 Slot PVC Well Screen

Bottom CapSediment Sump

- Bentonite Pellets Seal

bull Sand Pack

Bentonite Pellets Seal

Sand Pack

Appendix C Figure C-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram Response to RIDEM and EPA Action Items

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540vwpmonitoring well plantepnng 2004Revised Bedrock Figure April 04

ATTACHMENT D

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE FOR THE ON-SITE LABORATORY AT THE

WEST KINGSTON TOWN DUMPURI DISPOSAL AREA SITE

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

1 4 f

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid Analysis of Trichloroethene and Tetrachloroethene in Water Using ZNose Model 7100 Gas Chromatograph (GC)

Daily Startup Procedure for GC bull Confirm internal ultra-pure helium (He) tank is at 300 psi or greater if less

refill to 1200 psi bull Turn on internal He supply valve bull Turn on system controller (laptop) and connect RS-232 interface bull Bake system for 10 minutes set column to 140 degrees C valve and inlet to

150 degrees C and trap to 250 degrees C Fire trap for at least five cycles bull Fill sample preparation water bath and set to 30 C bull After the bake cycle is complete load the analytical method as shown in

Figure 1 and allow temperatures to reach target operating levels bull Temperature ramp 40-60 degrees C at 2 degrees C per second for

10 seconds 30 second data collection bull Valve and Inlet temperatures 70 degrees C bull Trap temperature 250 degrees C bull Pump headspacefor 20 seconds

Figure 1 - Programmed Method Method Sense4Simplex1020032ps-2a1b 20 40 to GO degmlh

gt 1GO

60

0 (I

Initial Setting- (CJ Senior Column I D I ( 4 0

240 340 64

00 05 20 5 21 0 230 23 0 24 0 24 0 34 0 64 0

bullit

Page 1 of 5

fgtltS(BwK1ylaquofiiiltgtff WiI -rt

)ecription

Position 2 2praquo-2a1b_20 40 to BO degmlh 2 degcc 40-60 deg

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004

bull Once temperatures have reached operating targets set sensor temperature to 140 C for one minute and then restore setting to target operating temperature

bull Set the GC to autorun (to repeat cycles) and set the operating display to cascade

bull Start the GC to run consecutive ambient air blanks until no peaks other than water (RT = 068 sec) exceed 20 cts as shown in Figure 2

Figure 2- Screenshot showing acceptable operating baseline

Im 556 --Vat 7

Mdliod 20 fog dot 2p2alb fQ vatvo ard 70 rtel 250 liao

2 plaquo svc 40 to 60 ptmd larnpte 20 sec teraftl^TOfaH^OI- tgtJO 40to60mth

Ua-t

Dale I Time 10202001 12 0347

si 1 500shy

m ij i ODO Spore 1000

bull Run a follow-up blank of headspace over the distilled water (20 mL in 40 mL VOA vial with Teflon septum) to be used for the days operation to establish the clean water baseline

Standards and Calibration

bull Retrieve 125 mgL (in MeOH) standard stock from fridge standard stock is to be stored with septa down and are to be kept no more than 30 days - if out of date replace with fresh standard stock

bull Prepare 5 standard solutions for the analytes at the following concentrations 7 ugL 66 ugL 125 ugL 250 ugL and 1000 ugL Note If higher sample concentrations are envisioned than the final point can be set higher

Page 2 of5

11

ltraquo

Bshy

laquobull

gM

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 bull Inject 2 uL 20 uL 40 uL 80 uL and 320 uL of standard stock respectively

to enough HPLC grade MeOH to fill one 40 mL VOA vial for each standard bull Shake each using a consistent side to side motion for 30 seconds and let sit

for 10 minutes bull Ready an empty certified clean 40 mL VOA vial and using a consistent and

smooth motion split each standard into 2 portions of 20 uL each taking care to minimize the time each vial is open Shake each from side to side for 30 seconds then place in the 30 degrees C water bath for at least 10 minutes while the headspace and water equilibrate Note Distilled water blanks are to be treated in the same manner

bull Perform GC runs in the following sequence analyzing both vials for each run Note if the responses for each of the two runs for each standard differ by more than 15 percent prepare and run another standard of that concentration

Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 2 Blank - distilled water ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

3 7 ugL standard 4 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 5 66 ugL standard 6 Blank - ambient air 7 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 8 125 ugL standard

9 Blank - ambient air 10 Blank - ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 11 250 ugL standard 12 Blank - ambient air

13 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat 14 1000 ugL standard 15 Blank - ambient air

16 Blank-ambient air ensure adequate baseline otherwise repeat

bull Analyses are conducted in the following manner 1 The vial is raised against the luer needle of the GC inlet piercing the Teflon septum

of the sample vial such that the luer opening is approximately centered in the 20 mL of headspace Care must be taken to ensure that the luer opening remains free of water

2 A clean sparging needle is inserted into the vial such that the needle opening is at the bottom of the vial once the GC headspace pump is activated the sample will be sparged with ambient air

3 After each analysis is complete (total run time lt 1 minute) the vial is manually removed taking care not to handle the luer opening The sparge needle is removed

for re-use and rinsed three times with HPLC grade MeOH and rinsed with distilled water

bull Calculate the arithmetic average of GC sensor response for each of the five standard samples for each compound of interest and plot on a logarithmic scale with concentration on the x-axis and sensor response in counts (cts) on the y-axis Perform a regression to achieve the line-of-best fit For example

Page 3 of 5

ihe Johnson Company Inc SOP-FieldGC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 Calibration Data PCE Respcnse y = 56834

TCpoundRes(ltmlaquoY-2S78x

cis-DCE f trsponse y - 76595

10000 n

1000 shy

10 shy

10 100 1000

ppb

PCE - T C E cis-DCE mdashLinear (PCE) mdashLinear (TCE) mdash Linear (cis-DCE)

A correlation coefficient exceeding 095 is desired

Sample Analysis

Samples are provided to the field analyst in 40 mL VOA vials and prepared for analysis and analyzed in the same manner as the standards described above

If the first of the two split samples exceeds the upper calibration point (in this case 1000 ugL) for any analyte the second vial will be diluted with distilled water to target a diluted concentration within the calibration range If the first vial does not exhibit analytes above the calibration range then the second vial is analyzed in the same manner as the first and the arithmetic average of the GC sensor response for each vial is considered as the net response The response is compared to the calibration curve for each respective analyte to establish the measured concentration in ugL

Routine Quality Control

Ambient air blanks will be run after each analysis for which detectable analytes are observed the blank runs are to be repeated until an acceptable baseline is achieved prior to performing additional sample analyses

After 20 sample analyses are performed a single point calibration check will be performed using the 66 ugL standard The check will be considered successful if the measured concentration is within 20 percent of the concentration measured for the 66 ugL standard during the construction of the calibration curve If the check is not successful the calibration curve will be reestablished using new measurements

Page 4 of5

The Johnson Company Inc SOP-Field GC-1 Rev 0

April 12004 W

File Storage and Reporting

Log files of each GC run will be stored in the project directory established within the GC controllers hard drive A backup will be created at the end of each day and stored on a separate drive A compilation of all GC log files from the

bull project will be prepared at the end of the project and stored in the main project files

Screen capture images of each GC sample run will be saved within a PowerPoint file for each day of GC operation The PowerPoint files will also be backed up at the end of each field day and compilations will be stored in the main

project files

CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsGCStandard Operating Procedure for Screeningdoc Reviewed by JRB

Page 5 of 5

bullm

Filename Standard Operating Procedure for Screening Directory CDocuments and SettingsGAKMy DocumentsVGC Template CDocuments and SettingsVGAKAApplication

DataMicrosoftTemplatesNormaldot Title

Analysis of Subject Author Keywords Comments Creadon Date Change Number Last Saved On Last Saved By Total Editing Time Last Printed On

Standard Operating Procedure for Screening-Level Rapid

Glen A Kirkparrick

412004 1207 PM 4 412004 303 PM Glen A Kirkparrick 176 Minutes 412004 305 PM

As of Last Complete Printing Number of Pages 5 Number of Words 1031 (approx) Number of Characters 5882 (approx)

ATTACHMENT E

PNAPL CONTINGENCY PLAN

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

DNAPL Contingency Plan

Purpose

This document describes the methods to be employed during the monitoring well network installation to assess the presence of and provide for the containment and removal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) during bedrock drilling at MW-1B and MW-2B The primary concern is the remobilization of DNAPL if encountered during the drilling process Issues of worker health and safety are addressed in the site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)

DNAPL Screening Hit

Screening for the presence of DNAPL during bedrock drilling will be conducted using air space monitoring [with a handheld photoionization detector (PID)] and visual assessment of drill cuttings during boring advancement Continuous vapor monitoring for total volatile organic compounds (TVOCs) will be conducted using a hand-held photoionization detector (PID) with a minimum detection level of at least 01 ppm A measurement of 100 ppm TVOC or greater in the drill cuttings or open air space directly above the cuttings will trigger the contingency actions described in Section 3 below (See Figure E-l attached to this Attachment)

The TVOC monitoring will be supplemented with a visual drill cutting assessment using ultrashyviolet (UV) light Many NAPLs will fluoresce in the presence of a UV light source Samples of drill cuttings will be collected at roughly 10-foot intervals during the drilling process and visually evaluated for the presence of DNAPL in a darkened environment under LTV light If the presence of DNAPL is suggested that will also trigger the contingency actions described below (See Attachment E Figure E-l)

Contingency Actions

In the event that evidence suggests that DNAPL is present during bedrock drilling except as noted below the following actions will be implemented

1 Stop drilling and note the time 2 Notify the project manager that DNAPL is suspected and the contingency plan has been

implemented 3 Remove the down-hole drill tools from the borehole 4 Check the base of the boring for DNAPL using an oilwater interface probe The

interface probe used will have a measurement accuracy of at least 005 feet for NAPLs Note the presenceabsence of DNAPL and the time Record the measured thickness of DNAPL if present

5 Continue checking the base of the borehole for DNAPL at approximately 10-minute intervals for a period of approximately 1A hour

6 If DNAPL is not present in the borehole at a measurable thickness after bullgt hour notify the project manager and resume drilling and DNAPL screening

7 If DNAPL is present at a measurable thickness in the boring notify the project manager and commence DNAPL removal as described in Section 4 below Drilling at the boreholes containing DNAPL will be temporarily terminated pending the results of further evaluation and consultation with USEPA and RTDEM If the DNAPL can be

E-l

successfully removed from the boring and does not reoccur for at least three days drilling may continue upon verbal approval from USEPA and RIDEM If the DNAPL continues to enter the borehole indicating a large or ongoing source drilling will be terminated indefinitely and DNAPL recovery will continue

DNAPL Containment

Immediately following drilling caliper logging and testing of the bedrock borehole a stainless steel sump will be installed at the base of the borehole to contain and prevent further downward migration of the DNAPL The sump will also allow for the measurement and recovery of DNAPL from the borehole if it is encountered

The sump will consist of a 2-inch inner diameter stainless steel riser five feet in length and closed at the bottom The sump will be attached to the well screen as shown in Figure E-2 of this document The sump will be sealed in place using cement andor bentonite grout The grout will be tremied in place using a polyethylene tube that will be temporarily attached to the sump Bentonite grout will be placed to the top of the sump (up to one foot into the screen) and allowed to set overnight prior to additional borehole testing

If DNAPL is encountered during the drilling or monitoring processes it will be recovered using a submersible pump and containerized in new 55-gallon steel drums that will be sealed at the well head for characterization and disposal purposes DNAPL recovery and disposal efforts will be evaluated in concert with EPA and RIDEM to determine the appropriate method frequency and duration

DNAPL Monitoring

During advancement of bedrock boreholes the boreholes will be measured with the interface probe at the end of each day of drilling and immediately upon borehole completion Thereafter the sump will be monitored weekly until the flow prevention packers are placed in the borehole

E-2

Air space detection gt100 ppm VOCs

Yes

Fluorescence Test No

Stop Drilling Call Project Manager

Measure and record thickness of NAPL if detected

Measure for DNAPL every 10 minutes for 2-hour Is

DNAPL present

Yes

Conduct borehole testing and install Sump

Completion depth close to design depth

Yes v

Installation Complete

No Continue Drilling

Continue Drilling

No Continue Drilling

Move drill rig to new No location and repeat from

top of this flow diagram

Attachment E Figure E-1 DNAPL Contingency Flow Diagram

West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area S Kingstown Rl

E-3

Protective Casing shy Padlock

Well Cap

Weep Hole shy-Sand

Ground Surface

OVERBURDEN

- Top of BedrocK

BEDROCK

-4-6 Steel Casing Seated 3-5 into Bedrock

- Bentonite Grout

-2 Stainless Steel Riser

-00 Sand Pack

laquoraquo -0010 Slot Stainless Steel Well Screen

Not to Scale

Minimum 3-58

-2 Stainless Steel DNAPL Sump (2 feet in length)

-Bentonite Grout

- Bottom of Boring (75 bgs)

Appendix E Figure E-2 Typical Bedrock Well Construction Diagram

with DNAPL Sump West Kingston Town DumpURI Disposal Area Site

S Kingstown Rhode Island

WOODARDampCURRAN 205540wipmonitoring well planSpring 2004 DRAFTfiguresbedrock well wdnapl sump2 App E Fig E-2cvx

ATTACHMENT F

Project-Specific Investigation Derived Waste (IDW) Management Plan

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Quran Inc

-amp$ bullbullbullbull bull

rVK^vV--Av^H

Management of Investigation Derived Waste (IDW)

Introduction

This section describes how investigation derived waste (IDW) from the drilling program at the Site will be managed during the installation of the long-term monitoring well network This plan has been developed to protective of human health and the environment IDW management will be conducted in accordance with RIDEMs IDW Policy Memo 95-01 as amended to meet project specific requirements as described below

Classes of IDW

For this Site IDW will include the following four classes

1 Soils - Drill cuttings resulting from borehole advancement

2 Water - drilling and decontamination fluids

a Groundwater generated from drilling advancement monitoring well development and purging

b Fluids generated from decontamination of drilling and pumping equipment

3 Disposable Items - Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Management of each of these classes of IDW is discussed below

IDW Management

The classes of IDW listed above will be managed as described in the following sections A decontamination pad will be constructed at a central location for the purpose of cleaning drilling and sampling equipment Decontamination water will be collected and stored in large plastic tanks When a tank becomes full it will be sampled of GA groundwater criteria Table F-l presents a list of GA compounds analytical method to be used and the laboratory (practical quantitation limit) PQL

Soils

Drill Cuttings - Drill cuttings soils will be collected at ground surface during drilling activities Excess cuttings will be transported to an area of the uncapped landfill and covered when the cap is constructed No analytical testing is anticipated for the drill cuttings

Water

Drill Fluids and Purge Water - Groundwater generated during the advancement of drill tools and during well development will be containerized in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad All IDW fluids including drilling water excess sampling water well development water and decontamination fluids will be collected in one of two large plastic storage tanks staged adjacent to the decontamination pad

Decontamination Water - Water generated from flushing the interior of the development pump or the steam cleaning of auger flights and other drilling equipment will be containerized along with drilling fluids in large plastic holding tanks placed adjacent to the central decontamination pad

F-l

Liquid IDW Testing and Disposal - when one of the storage a tank at the decontamination pad becomes full it will be sampled for a full suite of analytes consistent with RIDEM GA criteria as provided in Table F-l Once IDW sample results are available from the off-site laboratory they will be compared to GA criteria if results do not exceed GA criteria or laboratory PQLs the water will be discharged to the ground surface IDW discharged to the ground surface in a manner consistent with Section 32F of the RIDEM IDW guidance and will be managed in such a manner that it will not be allowed to flow directly into a surface water body or wetland If waste does not meet GA criteria the water will either be treated on-site to meet surface discharge criteria (ie GA groundwater standards) or will be shipped off-site for disposal

Disposable Items

Personal Protective Equipment - PPE will undergo gross decontamination (ie removal of visual soil) at the exploration location and then will be placed in trash bags for disposal as regular trash

F-2

Table F-l Proposed IDW Analytes and PQLs

A Inorganic Chemicals

B Organic Chemicals

Substance

Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium (total) Cyanide Lead Mercury Nickel Nitrate (as N) Nitrite (as N) Selenium Thallium

Adipate(diethylhexyl) Alachlor Aldicarb (Temik) Atrazine Benzene Benzo(a)pyrene Carbofuran Carbon Tetrachloride Chlordane 24-D Dalapon Di(2-ethylexyl)adipate Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) Dichlorobenzene o-Dichlorobenzene m-Dichlorobenzene p-Dichloroethane (12-) Dichloroethylene^J 1-) Dichloroethylene (cis-12) Dichloroethylene (trans- 12-) D ichlorome thane Dichloropropane ( 1 2-) Dinoseb Endothall Endrin Ethylbenzene

Groundwater Quality Standard (milligrams per liter expect as

noted)

6 50 2000 4 5 100 200 15 2 100 10000 1000 50 2

400 2 10 3 5 02

L^O 5

L2

70 200 400 6 02

600 600 75 5 7 70 100

5 5 7 100 2 700

PQL ug1

20 10 10 4 2 10 10 5 02 10 100 20 10 10

2 05 10 5 2 02 10 2 05 1 4 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2

5 2 1 20 005 2

Method

601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB 601 OB SW-9014 601 OB 7470 601 OB EPA 3532 EPA 3541 601 OB 601 OB

SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B SW-8270C (SIM) SW-8270C SW-8260B SW-8081A SW-8151A SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8270C SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8260B

SW-8260B SW-8260B SW-8151A SW-8270C SW-8081A SW-8260B

F-3

Notes 1

2

3

Groundwater Quality Standard

Substance (milligrams per PQL ug1 Method liter expect as

noted) Ethylene dibromide (EDB) 005 2 SW-8260B Heptachlor 04 015 SW-8081A Heptachlor epoxide 02 01 SW-8081A Hexachlorobenzene 1 1 SW-8270C Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 2 SW-8270C Lindane 02 015 SW-8081A Methoxychlor 40 1 SW-8081A Methyl tertiary butyl ether 40 2 SW-8260B (MTBE) Monochlorobenze 100 2 SW-8260B Naphthalene 20 2 SW-8260B Pentachlorophenol 1 1 SW-8151A Picloram 500 1 SW-8151A Polychlorinated biphenyls 05 02 SW-8082 (PCBs) Simazine 4 2 SW-8081A Styrene 100 2 SW-8260B Tetrachloroethylene 5 2 SW-8260B Toluene 1000 2 SW-8260B Toxaphene 3 1 SW-8081A 234-TP (Silvex) 50 1 SW-8151A Trichlorobenzene ( 1 24) 70 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethane (111-) 200 2 SW-8260B TrichJoroethane ( 1 1 2) 5 2 SW-8260B Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 2 SW-8260B Trihalomethanes (total) 100 2 SW-8260B Vinyl Chloride 2 2 SW-8260B Xylenes 10000 2 SW-8260B

The numerical groundwater quality standards in these Rules and Regulations are based primarily on the maximum contaminant levels listed by the Rhode Island Department of Health in the Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Drinking Water January 1995 for GA Waters

Analytical results that are reported at less than the PQLs will be considered non-detects

Not all GA analytes have been included on the list Analytes not previously reported have been removed

F-4

ATTACHMENT G

RIDEM TOW Policy Memo 95-01

(Long-Term Monitoring Well Network Work Plan)

Woodard amp Curran Inc

State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management

Division of Site Remediation

Policy Memo 95-01

Guidelines for the Management of Investigation Derived Wastes

10 Purpose

The purpose of this policy memo is to provide guidance regarding the management of potentially contaminated materials generated during environmental site investigations pilot tests and interim remedial actions (hereafter referred to as investigatory activities) conducted on property in Rhode Island It is the intent of the Department that the management of investigation derived wastes (LOW) be

bull protective of human health and the environment and accordingly result in no additional site related risks than existed prior to investigation activities

bull cost effective consider the likely site remedy and consider waste minimization techniques and

bull done in a manner consistent with all applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements to the extent practicable

The management of IDW should recognize that investigatory activities are not considered comprehensive remedial actions and therefore final management of most materials encountered during these activities should be postponed to the extent feasible until a final site remedy has been determined

The potential problems of managing IDW should be a factor in choosing an investigative method Project managers should strive to minimize the generation of IDW to reduce the need for special storage or disposal requirements that may result in substantial additional costs yet provide little or no reduction in site risks relative to the final remedial actions

It is important to note that for all investigatory activities in areas which have the potential to encounter a listed hazardous waste stream all IDW originating from the area of concern must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management The regulated community may use the management and storage methods outlined in this memo or

submit for review and approval alternative EDW management proposals on a site specific basis The Division reserves the right to require additional IDW handling procedures as it deems necessary

20 Classes of IDW

For the purposes of this policy memo EDW are separated into the following four classes

A Solid - includes unsaturated soil soil saturated with water and pre-existing solid waste

B Liquid - includes groundwater drilling water and decontamination rinsate

C Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

includes liquid wastes any solids saturated with liquid waste (ie a matrix containing greater than 1 liquid waste) and buried containers such as drums electrical transformers electrical capacitors unexploded ordnance and any other type of container which could potentially contain a hazardous substance and

D Personnel Equipment

includes equipment and supplies which are not reusable upon completion of current site activities (such as personal protective equipment and disposable sampling equipment)

30 IDW Management Guidelines

The Department recommends the following management guidelines (arranged by EDW class) for initial handling segregating storage and disposal of EDW

31 Solid

These guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate solid EDW including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A All intrusive investigatory activities should be observed for evidence of buried containers or liquid waste saturated solids

B The preferable management alternative for all solids extracted from a site is replacement

back into the same excavation from which it originated however consideration should be given to the likely site remedy prior to taking this action

C Upon excavation all solid EDW should be placed on low permeability synthetic sheeting of thickness no less than 10 mils No material should be stored on synthetic sheeting for a period greater than 48 hours without receiving prior Division approval All solids stored on synthetic sheeting should be covered with similar material during all periods when excavation work is not being conducted in that area of concern

D When refilling excavations the original stratigraphy of the area should be maintained to the extent feasible If the excavation is such that it is not possible to entirely refill the excavation as in the case of a monitoring well placement the excess solids should be managed in accordance with Sections 31(C) and (E) of this policy memo unless an alternative management plan has been approved Under no circumstances shall solid IDW from one area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

E Long term storage of solids (typically periods greater than 48 hours) should be in secure containers which are suitable for potential off-site disposal (for example roll-off dumpsters or 55 gallon drums) The contents of the containers should be characterized to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method in a manner approved by the Division and consistent with the contaminants of concern at the site This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the EDW

32 Liquid

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which generate liquid EDW including but not limited to groundwater monitoring well development and sampling and decontamination procedures Aquifer pump tests are beyond the scope of this policy memo and require specific Department review and approval

A All liquid IDW which has been extracted from a site must be stored in a secure container suitable for off-site disposal and its contents properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern at the site to determine the appropriate treatment or disposal method These analysis methods should be consistent with those proposed for the site investigation work plan This characterization can utilize either site investigation samples or samples whose sole purpose is to characterize the IDW

B Storage of all liquid IDW should be in a segregated manner (liquid which has been taken from the site by area of concern from decontamination liquid)

C All non-decontamination liquid EDW that meets the groundwater quality standards for the subject propertys groundwater classification as stated in the Departments Rules and Regulations for Groundwater Quality may be disposed of on-site Liquid which exceeds

these criteria shall be handled on a case by case basis If it is anticipated that there will be exceedances of any groundwater quality standards at a site the investigation work plan should contain a proposed management plan for this IDW

D The disposal criteria for all non-decontamination liquid IDW containing contaminants for which there are no RID EM groundwater quality standards must be proposed and approved on a case by case basis Alternative criteria for each contaminant may be proposed as concentrations of individual contaminants or groups of contaminants (ie total concentration of volatile organic compounds) below which there will be no demonstrated additional adverse risk to human health or the environment

E The preferred alternative for all liquid IDW generated as a result of decontamination procedures is disposal on site

F Liquid EDW which in accordance with this memo can be disposed of on-site should be spread uniformly over a relatively level uncontaminated portion of the site The on-site disposal of liquid IDW may not lead to increased migration of contaminants from the site nor impact a surface water body wetland or neighboring property to any degree and must infiltrate the ground surface If the volume of liquid IDW generated during a single investigation is expected to exceed 250 gallons Division approval is required prior to any on-site disposal

33 Liquid Wastes and Associated Saturated Solids and Buried Containers

The following guidelines pertain to any investigatory activities which could potentially generate liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or encounter buried containers including but not limited to excavations such as boreholes trenches and test pits

A Investigations in areas which are likely to encounter liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers should include a contingency plan for proper handling and disposal of these wastes in the investigation work plan

B The Division of Site Remediation should be contacted immediately upon the discovery of liquid wastes and associated saturated solids or buried containers for all projects which do not have a Division approved contingency plan addressing this class of IDW

C All liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site should be stored in secure containers suitable for potential off-site disposal and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management andor the Rules and Regulations for the Investigation and Remediation of Hazardous Materials Releases as appropriate Liquid wastes and associated saturated solids extracted from a site must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances shall liquid wastes and associated saturated solids from one

area of concern be disposed of in a different area of concern without prior Division approval

D All buried container EDW should be extracted from its excavation upon Division approval This approval may take the form of an approved contingency plan or an incident specific approval by Division personnel Following extraction buried containers should be stored in a manner which provides secondary containment for 110 of the containers volume and managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities andor the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate The contents of any buried containers must be properly characterized by Division approved laboratory analysis methods for all contaminants of concern and as necessary to determine the proper treatment or disposal method Under no circumstances should an extracted container nor its contents be disposed of on site

E Unexploded ordnance encountered andor extracted from a site must be managed on a site specific basis under the direction of personnel from the State Fire Marshals Office the appropriate municipal Fire Department and the Division of Site Remediation

34 Personnel Equipment laquo

All personnel equipment EDW should be ultimately disposed of off- site and must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste Management Facilities or

bull the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management as appropriate Under no circumstances should personnel equipment IDW be disposed of on site

40 IDW Storage Guidelines

The investigation work plan must include provisions for the proper storage and security of EDW in the time period between the generation of the material and the determination of the appropriate treatment or disposal method The Department recommends the following procedures for the management and storage of EDW

A All EDW which is determined to be a hazardous waste must be managed in accordance with the Departments Rules and Regulations for Hazardous Waste Management

B For investigatory activities which are likely to require storage of IDW the site investigation work plan must include the following

1 selected containment methods

2 the designated secure storage area

3 a schedule for EDW disposal

4 a point of contact responsible for IDW management

C All non-hazardous waste IDW storage containers must be labelled with the following information

1 class of EDW

2 source area

3 date of generation

4 generator name address and phone number

D The period of storage of non-hazardous waste IDW should logically correspond with ongoing site investigative or remedial work and be completely disposed of within 30 days of the end of that phase of site work

Terrence Gray Chief Division of Site Remediation

April 18 1995 Date

siteremVidw mmo