lit review 04122011

Upload: mustafa-ameen-el-khateeb

Post on 06-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    1/52

    Writing a Literature ReviewResearch is to see what everybody has seen and to think what nobody else had

    thought. Albert Szent-Gyorgyi.

    Zaid Ahmed Shamsan, PhDUniversiti Teknologi Malaysia

    Wireless Communication Center

    Faculty of Electrical Engineering

    1

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    2/52

    Overview

    Report Writing

    The purpose of a report

    Chapter/Section Overview

    Writing a Literature Review

    How to read efficiently:-)

    How to use the literature to find literature

    How to take notes and combine them into a review

    2

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    3/52

    Report Writing

    The purpose of a report

    To communicate your work to an audience

    To demonstrate your understanding of a domain andhow your work fits into/contributes to/extends (as

    appropriate) a domain

    To back up your claims through appropriate

    evaluationTo discuss the significance of the results of your

    evaluation3

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    4/52

    Report Writing

    Implications(1) Report should be free from spelling mistakes and

    grammatical errors

    Ideas should be communicated clearly (simple sentences,etc.) and in an appropriate style

    There should be a logical structure to the way you presentyour argument

    Each chapter/section should introduce whats coming up and

    conclude with the significant points you want to make There should be no secrets! Early disclosure is expected.

    4

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    5/52

    Report Writing

    Implications(2)

    You are expected to read relevant work of others

    and report on it (be critical!)Clearly distinguish between your own work and the

    work of others

    Reference properly and consistently

    5

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    6/52

    Report Writing

    Implications(3)

    You must back up your claims (either by citing the

    work of others, or by referring to the results of your

    own evaluation)

    Results should be presented in a manner appropriate

    for the domain (e.g., how is relevant work

    evaluated?)

    6

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    7/52

    Report Writing

    Implications(4)

    You must demonstrate that you understand howyour work fits into the domain

    both in terms of how it fits into the literature and in termsof the results you obtain

    Ideally, compare your results to results of othersimilar work

    Easiest to do if you have access to shared test/evaluationdata or can replicate experiments done by others andcompare performance metrics (measurements)

    7

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    8/52

    Report Writing

    Typical structure of a report

    Abstract

    Tables of contents (figures, tables, etc.)

    Introduction

    Background/Literature Review

    Design/Implementation

    Evaluation & Testing

    Discussion of Results Conclusions and Future Work

    References Section!8

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    9/52

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    10/52

    Report Writing

    Table of Contents (figures, tables, etc.)

    10

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    11/52

    Report Writing

    Introduction

    What is the problem youre trying to solve?

    What is your research question?

    Why is it an important problem?

    Whats your motivation for solving it?

    What are your objectives?

    What are your main/secondary contributions?

    What were your main/overall results? Chapter/Section overview

    11

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    12/52

    Report Writing

    Background/Literature Review(1)

    Normally, assume that reader is someone with yourexperience/knowledge *before* you did the current

    work However, if work incorporates more than one domain,

    you are likely to have to give a brief background to eachdomain

    What prior work is relevant to yours?

    And why?

    12

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    13/52

    Report Writing

    Background/Literature Review(2)

    In your report you are trying to convince reader that

    your approach is sensible

    Youre going to demonstrate that your approach builds on

    the work of others, though you shouldnt refer to your

    current work here

    You should be critical of the work of others

    Youre also trying to show that you havent missedanything significant/important

    13

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    14/52

    Report Writing

    Background/Literature Review(3)

    I like to structure my Lit Review on a model

    (system) architecture to solve the problem Im

    working on

    What significant processing steps are needed to

    solve the problem?

    What are the different approaches to each processing step,

    and which systems use each approach? With what costs?success?

    14

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    15/52

    Report Writing

    Background/Literature Review(4) Lit Review should be a cross-section of the literature, rather

    than a sequential description of systems

    Keep description of other systems high-level Dont underestimate the importance of the Lit Review

    Shows that youve thought about the problem; been exposed todifferent approaches to embrace those that work, avoid those thatdont; acquired a certain depth of knowledge; are able to share thatknowledge critically

    Stick to peer-reviewed articles/books. Avoid wikipedia, magazines,newspapers!

    15

    http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/72347/july-31-2006/the-word---wikialityhttp://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/72347/july-31-2006/the-word---wikiality
  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    16/52

    Report Writing

    Design/Implementation(1)

    Now you can talk about your approach, and reasons

    for it

    It can follow the ideal model you presented in the Lit.

    Review

    You can, and indeed should, cross-reference to the Lit.

    Review

    Systems on which youve based your approach can bedescribed in more detail here

    16

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    17/52

    Design/Implementation(2)

    Remember to justify every decision that you make!

    Remember to adequately reference technologies you

    use

    Dont go overboard with system schematics (most

    of these can go into an appendix), unless it is

    appropriate to do so

    Write and describe, dont just draw!

    Report Writing

    17

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    18/52

    Report Writing

    Design/Implementation(3) Especially in implementation chapter, talk about major data

    structures and operations on them, rather than organise it byfunction! How do major data structures interface?

    What technologies did you use and why?

    If youve used code developed by someone else,reference it!

    Do give screen shots (remember to no. figures,tables, etc., and to refer to them in the text)

    18

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    19/52

    Report Writing

    Evaluation(1)

    What claims are you making, and how are yougoing to prove them?

    How are these types of system normally evaluated?(Give a small lit review, if there are severalacceptable approaches, and remember to providereferences)

    Are you able to follow normal evaluation, or do youhave to do things differently (because ofcost/time/etc)?

    19

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    20/52

    Report Writing

    Evaluation(2)

    Describe your evaluation set-up or simulationenvironment

    Equipment, participants (how many? What skills? Howdid you get them to participate? etc.), duration, location,etc.

    Describe your experiments/simulation and orexperimental details, and the results you obtained

    (be objective! Dont discuss the implications yet)Use tables, graphs, charts, etc. to describe results,

    but dont present the same results in different ways20

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    21/52

    Report Writing

    Evaluation(3)

    Describe the results, as well as presenting them

    Draw attention to anomalous results

    If required and/or appropriate, you should also have

    a section on testingdiscuss with your supervisor

    This should include a test plan and the test results

    21

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    22/52

    Report Writing

    Discussion of Results

    Objectively explain the significance of your results

    Both independently and in comparison to similar systems

    Explain why you obtained the results you obtained Including any anomalous results

    If you dont get the results you expected/hoped for, dont be

    afraid to explain why this may have happened

    "Ideas do not have to be correct in order to be good; it's only

    necessary that, if they do fail, they do so in an interesting way"- Robert Rosen

    22

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    23/52

    Report Writing

    Conclusion

    More than just a summary!

    Draw conclusions from your work (was it a

    worthwhile approach? What would you dodifferently? Etc.)

    In Introduction, you asked your researchquestion and you stated your objectives. But here,

    Answer the question and state whether you met yourobjectives

    Future work23

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    24/52

    Writing a Literature Review

    How to read efficiently :-)

    How to use the literature to find literature

    How to take notes and combine them into areview

    24

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    25/52

    Writing a Literature Review

    How to Read Efficiently(1)

    Read abstract

    If paper is relevant, read introduction and

    conclusionIf still relevant, read literature review and

    approach/overview

    If relevant, read evaluation and results

    Only if absolutely necessary, read detaileddesign/implementation

    25

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    26/52

    Writing a Literature Review

    How to Read Efficiently(2)

    Chicken and Egg

    If you know the problem youre trying to solve, your

    reading can be focussed

    If youre looking for a problem to solve, your reading

    strategy must change (initially)

    26

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    27/52

    Writing a Literature Review

    How to use the literature to find literature

    If a paper is relevant, it should have a relevantliterature review

    Read it, and track down and read the papers it refersto

    Use system like Cite Seer to find other papers thatrefer to:

    The paper youre reading Significant papers that the paper youre reading refers to!

    27

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    28/52

    Writing a Literature Review

    How to take notes

    If the paper is relevant, write down its bibliographicreference (entry should be complete) and give it an

    idJot down notes of anything (statements/opinions)

    that is relevant/interesting (in the sections yourereading)

    Remember to put direct quotations (sentences/phrases/unusual terminology) into quotes!

    28

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    29/52

    Writing a Literature Review

    Based on your research, build a model of the(reasonably high-level) processing steps needed

    Organise your notes around the model

    You should end up with a series of statementsrelated to each processing step about each paper youread

    Remember to use the ref id with each statement!

    You can now make statements about groups ofpapers

    29

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    30/52

    Writing a Literature Review

    Referencing your sources

    Every time you make a claim, you need to provide a

    reference

    At the point in your report at which you make the claim

    And full referencing details of the source in the references list

    Avoid Plagiarism.

    30

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    31/52

    615-610 JCarroll

    Types of Literature Review(1)

    self-study reviews

    demonstrate familiarity and learn from others

    increases the readers confidence

    context reviews

    creates links to a developing body of knowledge

    establishes the significance and relevance of a

    research project

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    32/52

    615-610 JCarroll

    Types of Literature Review(2)

    historical reviews

    shows the development of an idea or theory over

    time

    only used on the most important ideas

    theoretical reviews

    presents and evaluates different theories

    may integrate and extend theories

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    33/52

    615-610 JCarroll

    Types of Literature Review(3)

    integrative reviews

    presents the current state of knowledge

    provides a service to other researchers

    methodological reviews

    evaluation of the methodological strength of past studies

    a meta-analysis critically examines the findings of a

    large number of research projects

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    34/52

    Language Style Guide 1

    Consider writing in the first person singular(e.g., I)

    You can use an active, rather than passive, voice

    It shows you identify with what you have done, so itmay be easier for the reader to engage with your

    writing

    It is less dry

    34

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    35/52

    Language Style Guide 2

    Tense

    Use the present tense throughout, except whenreferring to material in earlier chapters, when you

    can use the past tense.

    35

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    36/52

    Language Style Guide 3

    Figures, Diagrams, etc.

    Use the past tense to describe what you did.However, you can use present and future tense when

    appropriate. Limit mixing tense in the sameparagraph.

    36

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    37/52

    Language Style Guide 4

    Figures, Diagrams, Tables, etc.

    Start numbering from e.g., Figure 1, Table 1,Diagram 1, etc., and increase number throughout

    report Can also restart numbering in each chapter e.g., Figure

    5.1 is the first figure in chapter 5.

    Always give figure, diagram, etc., a caption

    Always place the figure, etc., before the firstreference to it in the text

    Always refer to the figure, etc., in the text 37

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    38/52

    Language Style Guide 5

    Always follow your supervisors advice!

    38

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    39/52

    LR Comparison?

    39

    A good literature review.... is a synthesis of available research

    .. is a critical evaluation

    .. has appropriate breadth and depth

    .. has clarity and conciseness.. uses rigorous and consistent methods

    A poor literature review is..an annotated bibliography

    .. confined to description

    .. narrow and shallow

    .. confusing and longwinded.. constructed in an arbitrary way

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    40/52

    Giving a Presentation 1

    The point of the presentation is to explain, inyour allotted time: what problem you were attempting to solve;

    what other approaches have been taken to solvesimilar problems;

    how you designed and implemented your solution;

    your evaluation results (how good is your system at

    solving the problem); and your conclusions.

    40

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    41/52

    Giving a Presentation 2

    Do not assume your examiners know anything

    about the problem domain, or if you are making

    assumptions then say so.

    Include screen shots of your system working inthe presentation, and use screen shots early in

    your talk so that your audience gets a feel for

    what you're talking about

    41

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    42/52

    Giving a Presentation 3

    Use a large font size - 30 points minimum is a

    good size.

    You can refer to hand-held cards or notes to

    remind you what you want to cover, but pleasedon't just read off the notes.

    42

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    43/52

    Giving a Presentation 4

    Don't dump large amounts of text onto slides.

    Try to look at your audience when explaining

    the content of slides, and try to avoid giving

    your back to your audience.

    43

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    44/52

    Giving a Presentation 5

    If you feel nervous, don't worry about it - it'snatural. Just take a deep breath. Once you get

    into your stride you'll be fine.

    44

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    45/52

    Giving a Presentation 6

    Use diagrams and screen shots, not just text.

    BE ON TIME - if you're late, you will lose

    minutes from your presentation. If you miss

    your slot, you'll get a 0.

    DO NOT OVERRUN YOUR TIME - when you

    are asked to stop, please stop, otherwise you

    will lose additional marks.

    45

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    46/52

    Giving a Presentation 7

    Also do not finish too early - try to pace your

    talk to fill up the time available.

    Speak at a normal speed - it's not a race!

    Start with an introduction to the problem

    domain, and then give a quick overview of the

    structure of your talk.

    46

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    47/52

    Giving a Presentation 8

    Practice, practice, practice, but please remember

    Einstein's Theory of Relativity - time works

    differently under pressure (even on the same

    planet) :-) Have a working clock/stopwatch with you so

    that you can keep an eye on time - expand on

    points if you're going to fast, and skip things if

    you're going too slowly.

    47

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    48/52

    Giving a Presentation 9

    When you are asked questions, take time to

    let the examiner finish the question, and

    listen to the question.

    48

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    49/52

    Giving a Presentation 11

    If you are not sure that you understand what

    you've been asked, then say so (politely). It's

    also ok to begin to answer a question by saying

    "I think I've been asked xyz" and give theexaminer a chance to address any

    misunderstandings.

    49

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    50/52

    Giving a Presentation 12

    If you don't know the answer to a question,don't try to bluff examiners are pretty good at

    spotting stuff like that :-)

    It is ok to take a while to think about the answerto a question or to seek clarification. Examiners

    are there to try to get you to expose what you

    know about your topic.

    50

  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    51/52

    More Links

    Comrie, A. C., Scientific Report Writing.

    UW-Madison Writing Center, 2006, Scientific

    Reports

    Report Tips

    Dolphin, W. D., Writing Lab Reports andScientific Papers

    JISC, A Quick Guide to Referencing

    51

    http://geog.arizona.edu/~comrie/geog230/report.htmhttp://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/ScienceReport.htmlhttp://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/ScienceReport.htmlhttp://academic.evergreen.edu/curricular/bgc1998/report.tips.htmlhttp://www.mhhe.com/biosci/genbio/maderinquiry/writing.htmlhttp://www.mhhe.com/biosci/genbio/maderinquiry/writing.htmlhttp://www.plagiarismadvice.org/documents/tipsheetsv3/tp06_AQuickGuideToReferencing.pdfhttp://www.plagiarismadvice.org/documents/tipsheetsv3/tp06_AQuickGuideToReferencing.pdfhttp://www.plagiarismadvice.org/documents/tipsheetsv3/tp06_AQuickGuideToReferencing.pdfhttp://www.mhhe.com/biosci/genbio/maderinquiry/writing.htmlhttp://www.mhhe.com/biosci/genbio/maderinquiry/writing.htmlhttp://www.mhhe.com/biosci/genbio/maderinquiry/writing.htmlhttp://academic.evergreen.edu/curricular/bgc1998/report.tips.htmlhttp://academic.evergreen.edu/curricular/bgc1998/report.tips.htmlhttp://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/ScienceReport.htmlhttp://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/ScienceReport.htmlhttp://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/ScienceReport.htmlhttp://geog.arizona.edu/~comrie/geog230/report.htm
  • 8/2/2019 Lit Review 04122011

    52/52