improvement in the feed value of water hyacinth...
TRANSCRIPT
τη iJA‖ 199‐一゛ 策
ジi魔渚SS笏 朧ふ
IMPROVEMENT IN THB FEED VALUE OF
IATER HYACINTH くRirhhn,.|■ ●'■
●■1つ eS, Mart.)
BY FERXENTAT10N IITH FILAMENTOuS FUNGI くつ1。 1・
'・ヤ11■ 0■ +‐●■■1■ 賃)
■
ヽ
●
Λ
^
THESIS SuBMェ
THB RIBQUlRBMBNTS FOR THE DEGRBE OF
MASTER OF SC工 3NCX
くTECHNOLOGY OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANACEHENT)
IN
「ACULTY OF GttU▲TX STUDIES
XAHIDOL UN17BRSITマ
1991
」「
ヽ υ
on■ lL■■1■1=
●m
■ねJ鳳ル.… .年.ユ続三
ユン34真
R00NGRUANG囀 ONGSEWEBRASAK´
OF
Copyright by Mahidol University
0
¨
e
thctisentitled
II{PROYEI{ENT I}I THE.8E3D VALUE OE
'cATER HYACINTH (Ei,shhornla crlliEiP.e.lL llart. )
BY FBR}IBI{TATIOH TITH TILAilBIITOUS BUNCI (SIET.AITI' ASTE.AfJE),n
,.Ll a-i:-;.;.ic ilt!-n,hl, ot r.,r;m,,+;-
;";"";;;"-":;::;-,;il:.'Candidate
-r.--?Mt4ianit SanEuantrakul, ll . Sc.
ll4j or Mvisor
v...-( Wf.tr.--!---l-----
Luepol Punnakanta, l{. Sc.
Co-advisor
4*j, (a/^--.-"j------)----
Anadi Chungcharoen, Ph.D.
?I--CM!lon t hreo
Dean
Pacu L ty
Chulasalaya, tl.D.,Ph.D.
of Graduate Studies
Raynadee Roachanakanan, !l . So.
Chaiuan
t{astcr o! Sclsnoa Pro8la! ln. :tr,.tt
Technology of Bnvironaontal'
llanagerent ifaculty of Envilon8ent and
Resource Studics
0^
Copyright by Mahidol University
0
´
・0
Thesis
entitled
ェMPROVEMENT IN THE FEED VALU3 0F
IATER HYACINTH (■ inhhn.・.1■ ■ニュニユニユユニ′Mart.)
BY FERMENTAT10N ‖ITH FILAMBNTOuS FUNGI く
―
―■L)
wag sub口 itted tO the Faculty Or eraduate Studieg, Mahid01 university
for the degree of l{aster of Science
(Technology o! Envllon[ontal ]lanar3sacnt )
On
Apri1 23, 1991 ′t`ι
Weerasak Roongruang“ onEse
Candidate
Aurapin Eansiri, Ph.D.
Chair8an
_二._5空Z″レ 成
Kanit Sanguantra■●1, M.5o。
■o●ber
_メ筆こ‐―●
Anadi ChuoEcharoen, Ph.D'
lclbcr,-!/,W*'---:*-.:{onthree chulasaBaYa, il'D" Ph'D'
D ean
?aculty o! Graduata Studio3
Luepo Illclbcr
Punnakanta, ll .So.
だ ″́′ビ
‐―――‐‐―――― ――弓″
―~~~
Aulapin Earslri, Ph.D'
D6an
EacultY of Envlronscnt and
Resoulce S tud ies
澁蔓 07
ヘ
Copyright by Mahidol University
0
)
・0
BIOCRAFHY
NAilE TEBRASAT ROONERUANGI{ONGS3
DATE 08 BIBTH HARCH 15, 1S64
PLACE OF BIR?H CHIBNGTAI PROVINCE
INSTITUIOTS ATTBIIDBD .B.SC.(AGRISULIURB), ilIO[ EABN
UNIYERSITY, 1983-1986'
-ll'Sc' (TECHIOLOCY 0E ENYISONXEIIAL
I{A}IACEITBNT}, I{AHIDOL U}IIVBRSIT?,
1S89-1SS1.
ヘ
Copyright by Mahidol University
へざ
ACK■0'LEDGEMENT
I wish to exPress ay apPreciation and glatitute to
assistance Professor Kanit sanguantrakul, Archarn Luepol
Punnakanta and Dr. Arnadi chungeharoen ny thesis advisors, for
.their valuable suggestions, assistances throuElhout the studv and
valuable recou[endations as wel]"
Grateful aPpreciation is extended to Dr' AuraPin Eausiri'
Chairltan of, the eualifying exaninations' for her recouuendations
and constractive discussions '
Sineere aPPreciation is exPressed to the people 'rho
provided their facilities and encouragelrent:
I'trs. Jitra Khinhon
llr. NuttaPol l{al'ad
ltr. Rattanachai Insuurachrat
H!. Suriya ChinnaPon8se
5 I{r. Suriya Yeekun
llr. Chaivut Se ingnu i
l{ost of all I would like to exPress [y sincerest to
aunt fo! her helPs, understanding and encoura€leaent throughout
studying life and also to ny sister and Hiss' Junsuda Kawil
their valuabl.e assistances t'hroughout the study'
y y r
n 口 0
f
'ileerasak Roongru anggongs e
Copyright by Mahidol University
'ialnarle:rd nrr r d:rnsdrnr.tour:ao ldnnutrrtaanr:xindl:a r'io:r r :lula
“らう8 5,Vttni JoL'00■ ●
`o■8■■■■Ol■■■nu饉■n (、 ■nl■1■ann,■ ,■■■■0じ,an3■ )
0 ‐ `悧口彰n■,■n■ ■R。 ■01JO■ an、■■9
n6n il?rnauflar ?r. t.
iona rhufiuo{. rn.l.
orsS ilreiq, nn.o.
■ ■4L
」=口
鉗■
3,'rdi.,ienr:finrr 23 rrx,tg:l a'A' 2534
■■0080
nr:fi*idaai.rriiinn.,hoa.rC riaf,n'r nr: rdr*oirnt rarzr::a r6fl nut:rtaanr:
■ヨ00■日Li3■■L■■1日 in81=LiO■ ■ ■1..■ oo■■■■ 1ln■■■9■o● IL■ ■ 2x2 ■10■01■日■ 1■
ncs iriflaiallne:f;nar z ita6a uri,rril z tudl l;uritii:namlria:rfi1i
二av 10% ■0●In..n“ n■■■■■■■0■■338■■■0■■n■■■■■1111.nn.■ 31nnOl■0■●I“nn3 5■ 1
n■■■■n■」na .av l′ 4 ■00n■■81日■■」na linn...in 25 うヽ ■5■■■■■in」1■n“1」,1■1■ら、1
■98 25 ■00n■■■31n 130n■■ni=San..。。1■48g.1 1.un .」 .■■■o■■■●ta■18714■
r i11 ufi nnll'lrdoirr,n.:rin ●■■■■0●n■■81Li■■■OLl■ ll■ .LLaVa●■n■1■,v■■■cn■■■aln tL■ 8
■■■n■■■n30■
^ 5,10■15。 20
ilnll :rnr:aisdnnxn? 'tlrin
■■■■口lli■■■も」071nn■■■■ntii11...
.,ranrziifi.uiylataqzv6u:j?:nsria:rfiila21:1411!airinnrlr.ililrnr;zin fiiria
lo ,■ ■■1■罰]=J轟 1・3Jη O露ぶn囃嬌輛 遭=1桁"書
■
0.01 1」 0■●■.・4nl■μo■oO'Vtl彰もつヽ■11=1.nn,.コ nn■■131n● 1」,■■●18ギ■■■,n■■■31n ■■■■n■■
ァコnlln,■■■■ヽ 1■ 1.an ,o ■●彰 15 ,■ 1111nti■11.・ oι . 1・ 8」18J■●1・J'■■1■“ngl■■■n■
"n、1■
t,0■ 10 ■・l 115。.nn■ ,1lin,■■■■1ln.....■ 1/4 ■00n'n■日■■」nn■■nin● 1=」号■■●L■ 0■■
ヘ
Copyright by Mahidol University
「J
iii
s: se!, toz "uiitn-i1nr:lifinnurer$ia:raar'::1nfifi:tfi,a'luri',1:t1i
o'os ua'rdatilia,
rfiatriirroTil:'nufildnnulrrdl,if ioit.:lnt""in "itti'*u 14'04: Bac s'36x ar:rzirdu
1.:r:noirii:r.lut:i:ff:r1.:rfinn:rrrrrin, iu r:at t s :"r filriarnnr:1ifin,,t''tdi"tr:latrlnfi*in
tnalilli:r'lur,iatr s: ua:, ro: esaln'jrnr:1ie'nnul:rfiia'11!41': t/4 rairn2.t:t811
rlnfifi:cduarrrr r il'rrl1i o. o5 uao ria r:i?a:rtfratri?:nqTil:filri:rfinnnl:efil:ilicirlnr:rl'n
:urjr rilil t?.131 uar 18.16z tl1!a1a!
・ 1■ n■■再n,■■」■■■■30n■ 00■1■1バ.ti.1.“ n■■■■■lJ..n..■■n■■■■■■■ ■00パ」,vn3■
■ooninoil■岳う■、1...31n■■■nasn■■4 FAO nn■■oli gn3■■nin3■1■■■n11喘 aι l。,11■3●バ0
」,vno■・ι嘔ヽ L"■18161..,8■■m■■av7t'」101L・I■ 11。日1■」=コ
■“in
●
l.口 ιl...7コ n■■0■■■10m■
8■ 0■■■
'■■0
o.as-'o.so ra:rdfl1ta21:l,iln:nrilirollr'1fi 10 uau rs ra'rnrzrinail:rriel s'1o-5'80
ta8 4.80-4.95 ■■31ann■ 1■■ann■ oE■1lo■
81■n3●
“n■■■■■■31n ■
"LJ,“11」口n33●n■■OEIn“
n■ 3■On ing10EIn301aonn■ ■■38n3Jl■ 1's」,v83■饉 30.0-37.0 00■■1■at■■■ ■a8o“■naln■ 8
0 1■Ooo■ョn■o■■■■ 10 ■■V 15 o81■ ■■● 30.50-36.50 LaV 31.10-38.25 o■ ■■1■■1■日a
n■■」,V33■an■■■71■l13n■■●■口“nmu■■■■■n ■■■■n■■■■on■ 83■0011■口、■8■ T71●●O10■n
n■ ,1=」1■■●LiO'■ 5% L33 10% 7in lo l■ 1■=n9111■
■■110■■338■■ 1/4 ■000■η■8■■」naLl■
0.184 ■■m l■■口81 月.ll.Olan■■■o● 1」■■■■8■■■■30■■n■■■1=」1■■●L電 0■■ 5χ
I n■
“nel■■,■110■η
“ョ..」 n口 ιl. o.201 LaV O。 209 ■■71
■38 10% ■コn 15 ■1
.,ir. -e--.-i cr ( r'alarialrilirriunrrf,nrriisi'r;rafilriernnrtf,n:n',1 a'lr'llotirJru:llr1nBac
じ■■n■, L10■.tL。 彰■■'Ln■
llil....13n■'■
■niヽ■■.8・. ln3■■■7●■00お■■101」 、lol■ 5胡
、́ 」=“
■●1」■,■111=..。。nn■■■o101■ L。 11.■●lLnvn“ n■■ l■avn■■13Jl■
■■・・1■・■,0■■91ギ
n■■nn■■■■■■■0■ nn,■31nH■■■ n■■■11■n,..1.on..。 oan■■■■■■■n31ヽ■つ11■■lla o■ ,
dr.r.r., , irn:n r. itrir onaannr::linoil li'r l'il:ul'lu
o。 168 11n3
Copyright by Mahidol University
“一
■V
T hes is
Nane
Degree
Title IMPROVEMENT IN THE FEED VALUE OF WATER HYACINTH
(Eichhornia crassioes, Mart。 ) BY FERMENTAT10N
WITH FILAMENTOuS FUNGI 〈Pl● :il・ nヤ 1lc nst,■ ■+1l Q〉
Weerasak Roongruang"Ongse
Master oF Science (Technology Of Environmental
Managenent)
0 Thesis Supervisory Couuittee
Kanit Sanguantrakul, ll .Sc.
Luepol punnakanta, l{. Sc.
Anadi Chungcharoen, ph. D.
Date of Graduation 23 April B.E. 2SS4 (1991)
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to iuproveaent the feedvalue of lrater hyacinth by fernentation with fila[entousfungi(Pleurotus ostreatus) . The 2x2 factorial experiDent in
\- Randonized coaprete Brock Design (RcB) was used in this study.Two factors lrere studied at Z different levels; inoculut sizg offungus (A) used in faruentation at S: (AO) and 102 (A1) of raterhyacinth Height and length of trater hyacinth (B) at norlal 1ength(80) and L/4 of nornal length (B1). During the course offe"lgntation, protein eofltent of the biouass nas deterDined atdays 5,10,15 20 and 25. In addit,ion, othar factors were alsostudied including pattern of essenti&I aEino acids in Hater
hyacinth af t,er ferEentation, feraenting conditions such as pH and
ieuperature and cost of feraented riater hyacinth production.Copyright by Mahidol University
六) V
0
ResuLts of the study showed that both inoculum size and
Iength of !.at,er hyacinth used in teruentation affected protein
content Hit,h hiE h1y significant interaction (P<0.01) at 10 davs
of feraentation. Feraented water hyacinth at l0 and 15 days
gave satisfactory results, when tine used for fernentation and
protein content yielded in water hyacinth after' feruentation were
also considered. Protein content in rater hyacinth after 10 days
of feruentation using srater hyacinth at l/4 o? nornal length !?as
higher than that when water hyacinth at nolDal length was used at
both levels of inoculun size of fungus (52 and 102 of water
hyacinthweiEht)(P<0'OE).Moreover,nhenconParedsith!'ater
hyacinth before ferEentation, protein content tras increased by
L4.O4Z and 9.362, resPectively. 0n the contrllv, protein content
at 15 days of fernentation reeeived froo using water hyacint.h at
nornal length I'as higher than that received rhen used water
hyacinth aL L/4 of noraal length for both i-noculun size 5Z and
LOZ of water hyacintlr weiElht (P<0.05). Protein content when
coupared erith water hyacinth before feulentation was increased
by 1?.132 and 18. 162, resPectively.
tlhen pattern of essential anino acids in water hyacinth
after feruentation nas studied, it nas found that the anino acid
cooposition aet the FAo reference requireuent except for sulPhur-
containiaE ariao acids such zr,s !e Lhj.o!.i.Be "'d cystine, qDd
tryptophan rhich were Present in low quanti'ty.
Study on condition cf fernentat,ion indicated i,hat PH of
hyacinth lended to decrease durinEi the period ofrlater
Copyright by Mahidol University
´)
ハ‐
vi
fernentation. The value of pH during ferDentation ranged fron
3.g5 io 5.90 rith the pH values at 10 and 15 days of ferBentation
being 5.10-5.80 and 4.80-4.35, resPectively. TeuPerature in i'he
pile of feruenting water hyaci.nth varied flith aubient
tenperature. The range of teDPerature during fernentation rras
30.0-3?.0 C with tenperature in the pile at 10 and 15 davs being
30.50-36.50 and 31.10-38.25 C, resPectivelv.
Esti.uation of fernented nater hyacinth Production cost
found the eost Per grau of crude Protein Produced fron using
inoculun siu e 5U and 10u fernented 10 days nith water hyacinth at
L/4 of nornal length to be 0.168 and 0.184 baht. The cost per
graB of crude protein Produced fron using inoculun size 5Z and
LOZ fernented 15. days with water hyacinth at norual length lras
0.201 and 0.208 baht.
This research finding could be used as a guideline and
fundauental data for further research and develoPnent for
fer[ented water hyacinth -oroduction enPloying apProPriate
process, inoculuu and cheuical used in feruentation with
consideratlon in terms of both quantity and quality of protein
recieved after feruentation as ne11 as econonical benefit'
^
ヘ
Copyright by Mahidol University
^
ハ
ヘ
V■ ■
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEIENT
ABSTRACT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
CHAPTER
PaEe
iii.
viix
xii
I INTRODUCTION
1.1 Problen Stateuent
1.2 Objective of the StudY
1.3 Scope of the StudY
1.4 Hypothes is1.5 Expccted Results
II LITERAIURE REVIEI{S
2.1 The Advantages of Using Eilauentous Eungi
for Protein Product ion
2.2 Type of Residues and Crop Residues frou
Agr.icuItural Processing that CouId Be Used
for Feraentation rith Filauentous Fungi.
2.3 CelI Coaposition of Residues
2.4 Optiaun Hoisture Content for Fungal
Grorth and Palticle Size of Rat. l{atetialfor Eeraentation Process
2.5 Inoculum Size Used for Fernentation Process
2.5 Nitrogen Need of Fungi for Fersentation
Pr o cess
2.7 Digestion Uechanisns of Fungi
1
1
2
2
2
3
4
〈ゞ
9
01
6
7
8
8
Copyright by Mahidol University
1i
11
13
13
V■ ■■
2.8 Protein Produetion by Eetaentation Hith
Eilauentous Fungi Using Residues or 0ther
froD starch
fron henicellulose
fron I iginoce 1lu loses
for Food,/Feed
2.9.1 Food, feed and fuel Production frou
stea!-exploded li€nocelluloses 15
2.9.2 SoIid-state feruentation of
Iignocellulose 18
2.10 Nutritive Values of Funga1 Food and Eeed 2l
2. 11 Tendency of UsinCi 'rlater Hvacinth f or Anioal
Eeeding 23
2.12 Cheuical Conposition of llater Hvacinth 23
III RESEARCH HETHODOLOGY 29
3.1 Analysis of Nutritive Values of llater Hyacinth 29
3.2 Process of llater Hyacinth Eeraentation 29
3.3 Silage Condition Checking 30
3.4 Analysis of Nutriti.ve Values of Peraented
l{ater Hyacinth 31
323.5 Data Analysis
3.8 Cost Analysis of llater Hvacinth Eernentation 32
IV RESULTS OF THE STUDY 33
4.1 Cheuical Couposition of 'Jater Hvacinth
Substrates
2.8. 1 Fungal protein
2.8.2 Fungal P rote in
2.8.3 Fungal Protein
2.9 Utilization of FunS;i
Produc t ion 15
before FerBentat ion 33
Copyright by Mahidol University
(′
■X
4.2 Silage Condition between Feruentation
4.2. L pH Condit ion
4.2.2 TedPerature Cond i L ion
4.3 Protein Content in 'Jater Hyacinth after
ferEentation
4.3. 1 Protein Content
4.4 Cheoical CoDPosition of 4 optiuun SauPIes
4.5 Pattern of ADino Acids in l{ater Hyacinth
after Fer[entation
4.6 Cost of llater Hyaeinth Ferqentation
Y DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND RECO}I}TENDATIONS
5.1 Discussion of the Results
5.2 Conc lus ion
5.3 Reconnendation
BIBL10GRAPHY
APPENDIX ▲ Data of the Experinent
APPEND工X B Production CoSt Calculation
APPENDIX C MethOdS of Analysis
^
4
4
6
3
3
8
51
51
59
61
62
69
69
74
77
79
A-1
3-1
C-1
〈〓
Copyright by Mahidol University
ハ´
X
LISI O8 TABLBS
TabLe Page
Z.l The ceII coaposition of sone tesidues ?
2,2 Essential auino aeid couposition of protein in
e- cellulolvticun, other cellulolytieorganisns of SCP intelest, alfalfa, soya and
EAO reference Protein 22
\:i 23 Chenical couPosition of water hyacinth in dry
weight (DIl ) 24
2.4 Vitaains and anino acids couPosition of water
hyacinth ZB
4.1 Chenical couPosition of trater hyacinth before
33feruentation (drY bas is )
4.2 The pH aeans and overall neans of 25 days water
hyacinth fernentation of 4 treatuents 35
4.3 iniuun and naxiuun of anbient te[pelature during
25 daYs feraentation 42
4.4 l{inituu and naxiouu telPerature of 4 treataents
during 25 daYs ferBentation 43
4.5 Protein content(Z) in water hvacinth after
feEnentation 52
4.6 Analysis of variance of Protein content in Fater
hyacinth after 10 days feraentation 54.
4.7 Table of tteataent neans for trrotein content after 10
days fernentation 55
4.8 Analysis of variance of Protein content in water
(ヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
n,x1
hyacinth after 15 days ferqentation 55
4.9 Table of treatlent neans for Protein content after 15
days ferBentation 56
4.1O Cheuical cooposition of control and 4 optiauu
sanples 60
4.11 Pattern of anino acids in rrater hvacinth after
felDentation and its coEPa!ison with soybean and
FAO reference (Z total tEue protein) 62
r. 4.12 Production cost Pe! k€E of ferltented water hyaci.nth 65
〈‘
(ヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
ハ・
X■ ■
Lrst 08 llcuBEs
Figure Plge
Z.L An integrated Plan for Production of food, feed
and fuel frou steau-exploded lignocelluloses L7
2.2 ScheDatic diagraE of solid-state ferEentation 20
4.t lleans of PH froE lleatBent A0BO during fernentation
(25 days) 3?
3 4.2 l{eans of PH fron treattrent A0B1 during feruentation
(28 days) 38
4.3 l'leans of PH frots treatnent A1B0 during fernentation
(25 days) 39
4.4 l{eans of PH frou treat[ent A1B1 durinE ferlentation40(25 days )
4.5 0vera11 neans of pH frol each treatDent durinE
ferEentation (25 daYs) 4l
4.6 Anbient tenPerature during ferrentation (25 davs) 45
4.7 }lininuu and Daxiuun tenperatuEe of treatnent AOB0
1 during 25 daYs fernentation 46
4.E l{ininuu and naxinun tenPerature of treatuent A0B1
during 25 daYs feruentatiod 4?
4.9 Ilininun and uaxinuu teEperature of treat[ent A1BO
during 25 daYs feraentation 48
4-1O Ujri'n'r'ri and --.oi-oua teDperalure of trealqeat A1B1
durlng 25 daYs feroentation 49
4.11 overali neans of riniEuB and uaxinun terPerature
fron each treataent during 25 days fernentat'ion 50
⌒
Copyright by Mahidol University
ハ
xili
4.12 Protein content. (z) in water hyacinth after
iermen tat ion
4.13 InteracEion due to the change of direetion of
response
4.14.Interaction due to the change of uagnitude of
response
53
57
58
〈)
パマ
(ヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
( .
Λ)
CHAPTER I
INTRODuCT10N
1.1 Pr.ob lan Statenent
The present food supply, in ter[s of calorie and proteinper capita per day, indlcated Lhat the world is short of not onLy
good quality aniial protein but also in ealorie(energy)
requireuent. OnIy develoged countries have sufficient supplies
of protein frou aniual origin, while in Dost developing and
underdeveloping countries uany people suffer frou protein-calorie
ualnutrition. Sotre othe! developing countries are on a Earginal
scale for energy requireEent, but are short of anitraI protain.
In ord6r to solve this probleu, erop residues from aEiriculturalprocessing, weeds, or wastes froa industrial processing that are
abundant can be used as sourees of substrates for bioeonversion
into fungal biooass which is rieh in protEin. This protein can
subseguently be used for feeding aniuals.
llater hyac int h( E ichhorn ia crass ioes,llart . ) is an aquaticplant that is widely found i.n back-naters, snalrgs , canals, narshes,
and rivers. It can grow and reproduce so rapidly that it creates
uany pEobleus in the lropical and sub-tropical zones such as
naking the rivers shallow and obstructi,ng navigation. In order tosolve Ehese problens, water hyacinth can be harvested and
faraented with filanentous funEii f,or bioconversion into fungalbiouaass rich in protein. After that, it can be used as proteinsource for feeding an inals such as srine and ruuinant.
^
(ヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
Furtheruore, it ean also be utilized to nininize the problen oflacking of food in suouer season end relieve body seight loss inruuinants. lhis in turn nill help aniual to aaintain nornalgroerth and provide good conditions for aniaal protein production
for huoan consunption.
〈)
1.2 Ob-Jaativc O( l}e Studv
1,2.L To study the biologicalnutritive value of water hyacinth
filaaentous fungi.
1.3. 1 Crop
hyacinth( Eichhornia
1. 3.2 Fungus
1 . 3.3 Tiae
fernentation.
1.4 Htqothaslr
I.2.2 7o study cost of erat6! hyacinth feraentation using
biological process.
1.3 Sooae gl f..hc. Slll(lg
plocess for iuproving
by fernentation with
residue used for fer[entation is water
crass ines,l{art . ).
used for felDentation is Pleurotus ostreatus,
duration used for the studying is 25 days of
Feraentation of water hyacinth with filasentous fungi isa process that can help ioproving its nutritive value especiallyprotein content.
Copyright by Mahidol University
^
1.5 ■Yn.ハ■●H R● ■111● Q
l.5.l Using water hyacin th aFter Fermentation with
fi■anentous fungi as a source of additional protein for Feed ing
aninals.
1.5-Z Using water hyacinth after fernentation withfiLamentous fungi as a soulce of protein to suppleuent other
I sources that are quite expensive in order to reduce the eost ofaniuaL feed inEl.
1. 5.3 Us:.ng this process as a potential neans foriaprovin€ nutritive value of other residues.
ヘ
3
Copyright by Mahidol University
^
^
CHAPTER II
TITERATURB REVIB'TS
The use of uicroorganisus for the conversion oflignocellulose into food and feed rich in protein has been
stalted since llorld l{ar II. During the first Internationa}Conference on. !licrobial Protein, convened in 196Z at the
l{assachusetts fnstitute of Technology (UIT), Canbridge,
l{assachusetts, U.S.A., a new generic tern "Single-CelI protein"
(SCP) was coined to replace the supposedly less aesthetic teru"l{icrobial Protein or Petroplotein" reported by Chaha1 (1). This
decisi.on sas lost appropriate at that tiue, when the naiority ofthe uicroorEanisus used in protein production rere single-ce11ed
such as yeasts, bacteria and algae. By the tire the Second
International Conference lras convened in 1973, again at l{IT, soue
filauentous fungi and actinonycetes Here regorted to ploduce
protein frou various substrates. Since then, Dore and Bore
lepolts on the use of filrnentous fungi for protein production
frou starchy and lignocellulosic naterials are sgpearing. Thus
the use of teru single-cel1 protein is not a logical one nhen an
organisu is filauentous. Pilanentous fungi have been used . forprotein production sinee the 1920's as reported by Moo-younE eL
3I., (2) and Peitersen (3). The tera "Fungal Protein" has been
extensively used by uany rorkers in the pa,st, a.ad Eolr lbe Eerr
terlr "Yyeoprotein" has been introduced by Ranks Hovis llcDougall(RHH) in the United Kingdom, for protein produced on glucose orstarchy substrates as reported by Chahal (1). The U.K. Hinistryof Ag!icultural, Fisheries and Food has alloned the use of
【^
へヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
〈c
Eycoprotein produced by the filaoentous fungus, Fusariunqraninearu! A 35, for hunan consu[ption as reported by Neernalk
(4).
fn Thailand, the use of nicroor6anisns for the conversionof lignoceLlulose into food and feed rich i.n protein has baen
studied by MeevootisoD et al ., (5). They studied the inproveuentsin feed value of riee straw by feraentation rith filanentousfungi. at the Microbiology Departlent, Facutty of Science, I{ahidolUniversity as reported by l,teevootison 6t aI ., (S). At present,the use of filanentous. fungi for the conversj,on of o!he!substrates i.nto food and feed rich in protein still requiresfurther study.
2 . 1 Lhg AderntaceE Cl. Urlnl Ft larantoug lunll f o:r
Pr.oduet ionProta ln
Chahal (1) said that the use of filanentous fungi forprotein production fron various substrates was beconing popular
because of the the foIlowinEE reasons:
1.Soae of the filanentous fungi gree, as fast as lrostsingle-ceIled orElanisES.
2.The finished groduct o! the filatentous fungi lraB
fibrous in nature and could be easily converted into various-textured food. fn ccnparison, protein Has extracted fron singLe-celled organisus and spun int,o fibrous foru.
3.Filanentous fungi had a greater retention tiDe in thedigestive syste! than single-cel,led organisns.
Copyright by Mahidol University
6
4.Protein content could be as high as 35-502 rrithcouparatj.vely less nucleic acid than single-ceJ.led organisms.
S.Digestibility and net protein utj.liuation (NPU)
wit,hout any pretreatuent nas higher than that of singi.e-ce11ed
organ isDs .
6.The overall cost of protein production fronf i.lanentous fungi was Eore economical when coapaled to that of
the single-ceIIed organ j.sns.6- ?.Filanentous fungi had Ereater 'penetrat.ing power into
insoluble substrates and were therefore uore suitable for solid-state feluentation of lignocellulosic naterials.
8.l,lost of the filauentous fungi had a faint nushroou-
Like odor and taste rhich Dight be uore readily acceptable as a
new source of food than the yeasty odor and green eolot
associated with yeasts and alElae respectively.
9.The biomass produced by filauentous fungi could be
use as such without any further processing because it provided
carbohydrates, lipids, ainerals and vitanins as well as protein.In addition, the nueleic acid content of fungal protein was lower
than that of yeasts and bacteria.
2.2 Twoe AL Rasiduas A[C. CIg!, Reslduas f'on AaliculturrtProcalsina that Could lg Used ?or Faqrentef ion r{ th Ejllal.tlltltl.sFunci
In Asia as 'rell as Thailand, residues and crop residues
fron agricultural processing are essential food. sources forruninant anilals as roughage. Several types of residues are
available and soae at hiEih quantity. Thus, L,hey can be selected
【〓
へヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
^
for fEruentation and protein production for use in aniual
ploduction 1ocalIy. Soue of these residues include rice strat,
wheat stralr, veEietable Ieaves, suEarcane bagasse, wate! hyacinth,
rice husks, sorghuu stlan, corn stove!, pineapPle rubbish,cassava
leaves etc.
2.3 ●01l mmm-92 ●■ R― ―
1 Crop residues !re!e conposed of 30-452 cel1u1ose, L6-272
henicellulose and 3-132 Iignin as reported by Sloneker (6). llood
halvesting and wood-processing residues were conposed of 45-562
eeIlulose, lO-252 heuicellulose and 18-302 lignin. In general 707
of the carbohydrates such as ce1lu1osa and henicellulose coirld be
used by filauentous fungi for bioeonversj.on into fungal bioaass
ri.ch in protein as reported by Chahal (1). The cell conPosition
of sone resi,dues are shown in Tab1e 2.1.
Table 2.L The ceII cooposition of soue residues (Z)
【
・ Tvpe Cell
content
Cell
wall
Ce 11u-
1o se
Heuui- LiEnin Silieace 1lu1ose
Rice straw
Barley strarll.he"e. t -s trarr
0at straw
SorElhuB stra'r
SuEiarcane ba-gasse
21
19
20
27
26
18
79
81
80
73
74
82
33
44
39
41
31
40
26
27
36
16
30
29
7
7
■0
11
11
13
13
3
6
3
3
2
Source: Devendra (7).ヘ
Copyright by Mahidol University
(
・
I
2.{ Ootllua }loistu:rs Content !g3 Funca1 (lf.Onf.-b,'Ud, Pqrt{clc Sfr!,g;E Ra!, l{aterial for Fe?nenteti6n Process
The optiDus noisture content and particle size of law
naterial that are used use for producing fungal pEotein have been
studied by Flegel et al., (8) in rice straw. They found that the
optiEuB uoisture level for fungal growth was about 802. The study
on palticl.e size was done by deternining dly !.eight loss, protein
content and dry Batter digfestibility of rice straw divided into 3
lrarticle sizes; 2 rlt, 2 cu and 10 cE. These sanples relefernented using 4 strains of fungi; Isolate * 56 Cladosporiuu,
Isolate S 133 Pleurotus florida, Isolate * 135 E- ostreatus and
Isolate * 233 Geotrieun and conpared with a eontrol sanple. Iteras found that usi,ng rice stlalr of particle size 2 ou lrave the
highest percent dry reight loss when conpared with 2 ca and 10
cu, with particle sizes 2 ca and 10 cu not being significantlydifferent. Protein content and dry Eatter diglestibility differslightly but not significantly in the 3 groups. Thus, it was
concluded that use of different particle sizes did not affeetferuentation Trith the saEe interval tiue.
2.5 InCAJfIfE Size Used for: Perlantatton Pr!6c.ss
Flegel ct al ., (8) studied the optiau! inoculun size of
fungi for fer:rentation by dividing inoculuD size into 3 levels as
1:, 52 gnd 102 of rarl niterial. They observed persent dry weight
loss and protein content of raw uaterial Efter feraentation for 3
seeks. The fun6i used nere the sa[e as the study on optinua
uoisture and particle size. The result Has that using inoculun
【t
Copyright by Mahidol University
(一
iag
size at 12 of rar oaterial showed satisfied result when conpared
with inoeulua size 52 and 102.
However, using sualL inoculuu size as 17 could create a
problen in dispersinEf funEi uniforuly into the overall ratr
Eateriel when using raw uaterial in large quantity such as rice
stlalr at 500 or 1,000 kg. Then the leve1 of inoeulua.size should
be high enouE h such as 5-102 of raw aaterial . Thus, the quantity
of raw uaterial used has to be taken into consideration nhen
selecting the inoculun size.
2. I Nitroaen Xaed g.;( EgB8.i &f Fcraantatlon P:ooasg
Elegel et aI ., (8) studied the auount of nitrogen needed
by fungi for growth and protein production. They found that
using urea or anuoniuu salt as a source of nitro6en at the level
11 ot 22 by weight of raw naterial eras enouEh for fungal growth.
However, nitrogen need varied with the types of funEli and ralr
raterial for exanple, P. ostreatus needed 1.752 when feruented
with water hyacinth. The level of nitroCfen at L.?52 ras
equivalent to 3.82 urea or 5Z annonia nitrate. They also
reported that using only one nitlogen source f* ostreatus did not
'grow weII, but when urea and anuoniuu nitrate were used at a
proportion of 322, the fungus Eretr bett"r. Another experiaent on
nitroElen needed for fungal gEowth and protein production found
that P. florida needed 12 nitrogen (ureEiannoniun salt 3:2) nhen
fernented with rice straw for 1.5 weeks while Corpinus,/Chaetoniu'n
needed 22 nitrogen froo urea.
〔
・
さCopyright by Mahidol University
110
(■
2 . 7 D i ,est ion l{achan:lsns Ol' Eg8g.i
Chahat and Hawksrorth (9) and Chahal and {ang ( 10)
studied Chaetouiuur eellulolvticun and reported its taxonouic,
uorphologlical eharacteristics along nith the Prelininaryphysiological study, growth behavior and production of Protein on
pule celIulose. They found that long fibers of ceIlulose !r6re
broken into shorter ones during the early phases of feruentation,
followed by longitudinal splitting of fibers into fibrils and
ultinately, alnost conplete utilization of the substrate. This
organisn did not foru any pellets durinE feraentation, nyceliun
was found dispersed unlforaly with celIulose in the feruentation
nediuu. This characteristic aade it nore desirable for growth in
subnerged culture because oxygen had to becone linited in a
central bionass of pellets described by Phillips ( 11).
lloreover, the pelleted ayceliun nay have less cellulase and it
cculd create probleus i.n large-scale production of biouass,
because of poor uass transfer.
Chahal ( 1) reported that the hyphae of C-
epllulolvticun entered into the ce11 Iuuen thlou6h natural
openings, nechanical broke, or sE,ace in the celI raI1 of plant
oaterials created by the solubilization of heaiccllulose and
lignin during alkali tleatDent. once inside the cell lunen, the
hyphae started digesting the cell wall froo the inside tolrards
the outside ultinately consuring the 'rhoIe cell wall. Chahal (1)
enphasized that because of the good intrusion poerer of the
hyphae, the fungi could penetrate deep into the substrate for
《
ヽ
へヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
111
;!axilrun conversion into fungal biouass. DeeP penetration of the
hyphae into lhe substrate aade fungi the uost suitable organis!tr
for solid-state fe!!entation when conPared to single-ceIled
organisB such as yeast and bacteria, which lacked such Porer of
penetration.
218 Protain Produclion !g Feuentation with E.Ll.aEelliotls' EllBgi'
usind B,elridueis ol. Of..bsr Srths.lrEf.gr
= Protein Production Processes were available for
bioeonversion of agricultural, forestry and anioal wastes
food/feed rich in Protein:
2.E.1Punaal Drotaln troa staroh
Cassava (t{anihot esculanta Crantz) was a starch-
producinEl root croP cultivated extensively in tloPiea1 leEions in
Africa, Asia and South Anerica as a staple food. Its yieId, in
terE of calorias Pe! acre' had been rePorted to be along the
highest of any eultivated plant. However, its protein content
nas very low, and cases of nalnutrition had been repolted in
places where cassava !,as the staple constituent of the diet'
Thus, a Process for uPE ladinlt the Protein values of cassava was
developed by the UaiversiLy of Gualph, Guclgh, 0nterio' Canada in
collaboration nith the centro Internacional de Agricultura
Tropical (CIAT), Ca1i, Colonbia as reported by Gregory eE a1 "<L2) .
In this systen an anylolvtie fungus, AsoerEillus
f:ro.igailrs I-2L rePorted by Reade and Gregory (13) was used ' This
e
o
h
t
■一 n
●■
0Copyright by Mahidol University
(´
1?
organisn had the ability to produce sufficient auylases tohydrolyze starch into glucose and ultinately glueose was used by
the same organisu to synthesize fungal bionass rieh in protein.
In this process, the cassava roots Fere washed to
renove dirt and sand. The rasped and grated cassava roots were
duuped into a ferEentor containing water at 70 c. The
Eeuperature nas uaintained at 70 c for 10 uinutes to E elatinizea the starch and also to plevent the developnent of a fungistatic
activity in the oash. The fungistatic activity lras believed to
result fror the release of HCN frou the glucoside linanarin due
to the action of the enzyue linaararase and both the glucoside and
the enzyue !re!e present in cassava roots as described by Reade' and Gregiory (13). t{ore e?ater llas added to Eake a final
carbohydrate concentration of 47. The pH was adjusted to 3.5
siih H S0 , which also provided a supply of sulphur. Urea (3.524
€/l) nas. added as a nitrolgen source and KH P0 <O.5 g/l) as a24
source of potassiun and phosphorus. The telrpelature of the
fernentation uediun was naintained at 45-47 c. The Eediuu was
inoculated rith 7Z vol.,/vo1. oyeelial broth of Asoerqillus
funiEatus I-21 produced on the sane uedirin.
The final product contained 37 to 442 crude
protein. The nutritional value of A. funitratus proved to be
inf eri,or to the reference diet containing casein. llhen the
fungal diets rrele supplemented with aethionine and aII the
rations contained 102 "tlue" protein, the net protein ratio (NpR)
values were only.slightly inferior to the values obtained eithcase in .
へ一
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
13
2.8.2 lungal protaln f,ron henlcellulosc
H eaice 1l,u loses const ituted 20-25Z ofIignoceJ.Iulosic naterials. The heuicelluloses were easilyhydrolyzed to their uononeric sugars such as xylose, Dannose,
arabinose, galactose,. Eilucose and also uronic acids by diluteacid hydrolys5,s at aoderate tenperature and at[ospheric pressure
as reported by Lee et al., (14). The cellulose obtained fronI these treatEents was used for fuel ethanol production. Later,
these suElars (nainly xylose) had little value because they wele
not feruented into ethanol by counon yeast but eould be feruented
with filaoentous fungi for protein production as reported by t{oo-
Young et aI. , ( 15).
Chahal (1) tried to utilize these sugars for fungalprotein produetion. The biouass obtained was about 8.7 g fungalbionass,/1 by glowing a fungus Chaetoniua cell.ulolvtieua on 15.9 E
henicellulose sugars,/1 obtained frou aspen (Pooulus trenuloides
llichx. ) wood pretreated by high staa! pressure treattsenE.
2.E.3 FunSal protcin fron 118noo.llulo!.s
I{anapat ( 16) suggested that lrhite-rot fungus
( Bas id iooycet6s ) could digest constituents of fibers such as
cellulose and lignin.
Roger et aI. , <17) reported 13.3U dly neight (Dl{)
crude protein after 4 days groring of Asperrillus fuuieatus on
aIkaIi-treated ce 1lu lose .
ヘギ
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
^
L4
Peitersen (3) obtained, ZI-ZEZ DII crude Errotein by
growing Trichoderaa viride on alkali-treated barley sEraH for 2-4
days.
Vijchulata and Sanpote ( 18) found rice stlarferaented with VolvarielLa vol'races after used for nushroou
culture could be used for sheep feeding and upgraded dry aatterdigestibility, protein content and fiber.
Ericksson and Lassdn (19) obtained a product llith6Z DI{ crude protein fron powdered cellulose, 13.82 fron lraste
fibers, and 322 frou highly aoorphous cellulose by growinE the
lignocellulolytic organisla, Soorotrichun oulverulentun for 6
days .
trIege1 et aI., (8) obtained a product with L2.62
crude pro!ein fron fernentation of rice straw and digestibility
was also as high as 492 erhen used Pleurotus florida,
Chrvsosooriun sp. and 9e:.giLw. sp..
' Chahal and l{ang (10) and }loo-Young et a1.., (15)
reported that e-- cellulolvticun was better for SCP production on
pure ceIluIose than other organisns. A final product could
contain up to 40-452 DII crude plotein. Because of its specialcharacteristic that, C* celLulolvticuu had in tern ofthernotolerant, it could gror in high tenperature condition up
to 4O c as reported by Chahal and Harkscrorr-h (9) and it is also
tolerant to high urea condition as reported by FIegeI et aI.,(3). Horeover, it also had a hiEh penetretion por+er into fibersfor celI lIaI1 digestion, then using nutrients for growth and
A
ヘCopyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
15
【・
protein production.
Chahal and 'Jang ( 10) indicated that C.-
cellulolwticun seened to be the oost suitable organisa foreyclie-bateh and continuous felEentatiois because it could use
heuicelluLose and cellulose concerently for growing. Horeover, a
final product obtained had 35.72 DII crude protein and a proteinproduct ivity of 146. 0 D,e/L/h in batch feruentation and
approxiaately 4OO.O ag/l/ h in continuous fernentation rhen used
the pretreated Iiquor frou alkali-treated corn stover as
ferEentating nediun.
Updergraff (20) obtained approxiuately 102 clude
protein by growing Hyrotheciun veruearia on ball-oi11ed newspaper
for 6 days.
Crawford et aI., <2L> reported a 302 crude proteinproduct froa a O.5Z cellulose fiber slurry by growing
t Thermononosoora fusca, an actinonycetes, in 4 days
Daugulis and Bone (22> used Phaneroohada
chrwsosooriua, a white-rot funElus, for feruenlation of alkali-treated (washed) uaple bark and obtained t2-162, crude protein in
the final product.
2.g Uti I i2ation g( Funai tor
2.9. L Food, feed and
li8nocaIIuloscs
The product ion
Food./Faad Product i on
fuel production frol stEa!-exploded
1of food, feed and fuel fronCopyright by Mahidol University
lignocelluloses such a,s wood and crop residues which had been
steam exploded under high pressure has been reported. The ste:a-exploded Iignocelluloses had a very high runen digestibility(approxiuately 822) and could be fed as such to aniaals as an
energy source as reported by Noble (23). In cases Hhere a
couplete aniual feed rich in grotein was required, th6 exploded
wood could be fernented by C. 4+*l;4figg&. The final product
contained 2A-272 crude protein nhieh would supply the energy and
protein requireuents of the aniual.
An integlated plan for produetion of food, feed and
fuel fron lignocelluloses is shown in EiC-2.t
The stean-erploded lignocelluloses rle!e easilyfracti-onated into sater-soluble heaicelluloses and a rrater-
nonsoluble uixture of cel1ulose and lignin. llater-solublehenicelluloses were fernented with C- celluLolvtieun lnto high-quality fungal food containing 452 plotein or they eould be
t convertad into fuel (ethanol) through pentose feraentation with a
special yeast.
The lignin could be used to synthesize adhesives
and other cheuicals as described by Noble (23). The residualceIIuIose was hydrolyzed into glucose with cellulases produeed by
Ttiehoderna reesei on lignocelluloses, The glucose thus produced
?as iernented to ethanol or used to synthesize variouspharaaceuticals and other chenicals. During the enzyxe
prcduction the residual fungal bionass was also used as aniualfeed .
16
5ヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
17
【ヽ
Fig.z.r An integrated pran for produetion of food, feed and fuelfron stean-exploded lignoeelluloses
(ヽ́ 曲
|
|
m! HF i▼ 戸二 、
ド出躍ξ°|(eild〉一
一CCI IPF
C.C. - C- cel}ulol'rticun ,
H.F.- Hexose fermentation
Source: Chahal (1)
Pentose fernentationHydrolysis
P.E.―
, H O―2
うヽ
I r-16'n'-'cerluioses
i('*oorr :'ao resrcueI
Anrmal ieeO \fun::itξ‖iムass)
i lマ !
[1爾::‖:⊂∋
Hexoses
Gluccse
◇
Copyright by Mahidol University
118
In another phase of this i{hole process, the steaa-
exploded lignocelluloses lrere hydrolyzed Hith calLulases to yielda nixture of hexoses, pentoses and lignin. Lignin ras separated
by precipitation and filtration. The fractionat,ed Iignin was
used to uake adhesives and other cheuieals. The tsixture ofsoluble hexoses and pentoses was feruented with a coDEon yeast
into ethanol. The unfernented pentoses Here eonvertad by C.
t ce,llulolvtieun into a hi6h-quality fungal food containing 4bZ
protein, or into ethanol o! evaporated to [olasses to suppleuent
the aniaal feed.
2.9.2 SoIid-stato fcraentatlon of lignoccllulose
Solid-state feruentation, unlike slumy-state, requiredno complex fernentation controls and a siaple technology can be
used as reported by Hesseltine (24). This uethod was used forenzyne production as reported by Siluan (25) and for upgradinEl
the values of existinE foods. Later, researchers had turned' their attentions to the bioconversion of lignocelluloses into
protein-rich aninal feed, usincf solid-state feruenEation, because
of its various advantages such as using low technoloEy and Iow
cost of dewatering of the final product as described by Chahal
( r).
Detroy et al., (26) reported that ferrentation of Hheat
strarr Irith Plerotus ostreatus in solid-state for 50 days,aodified the substrat,e for enzyaatic hydrolysis, which resultedin 722 conversion of the residual ceIIuIose cooponent intoglueose and utilization of Lignin was approxi.r;ately 327.. During
うCopyright by Mahidol University
■
a
Han et
for Iarge-saa1e
' fernentation of
al ., (28) developed the followinlt two plocesses
production of aninal feed throuEh solid-statastrair:
Procare t
1g
feruentation, horever, there was alaost a total Ioss ofhenicerruloses and a 402 loss of the ceLrulose frou the oriE inalstraw fernented- rn this process an increase in diElestibility orincrease in susceptibilitv to hydrorytic enzyDes was attainbdafter. a long tiue (40-120 days) of ferEentation and loss of a
considerable portion of the earbohydrates was found. Large scalesolid-state fernentation by this process to iuprove the feed
values of strae, Eight not be econonieal beeause of these tiro
factors.
Paunent et aI., (27) obtained only g? DI{ crude proteinin the final product when aIkali pretreated aaple (Acer
saccharun) sawdust was feraented in solid-state feruentation rithc. ceIluloL'ticun for g days. The crude-protein content rose to112 Dtl when fernentation was continued up to ZO days.
I.
This process could be applj,ed as a continuous orbateh process. The stran was first chopped ro t/4 inch to 1 inchleagt.hs u.sing a haouer-oilr, .knife grinder o! attlition ail.r and
then conveyed to a pressure cooker. During transportation, threePart of 0.5 N H SO solution rere sprayed on one part of the24straw. The addition of a aininaL aaount of liquid nas assentialto this process for reducing t,he cost of operation and
へ‘
Copyright by Mahidol University
へ・
(一
2A
uaintaining the product yie1d. The straw was hydroLyzed, in thepressure cooker under ls lb. steam for 30 ninutes. The
hydrolyzed straw was treated with ammonia or annonium hydroxideto raise the pH to 4.5, and was then conveyed to a fernentationehanber - Acid treatment and subsequent neutralization withannonia produced a straw conEaining ZOZ fernentable sugars and
2-3t nitrogen. This Efave optinal conditions for fernentation.The pretreated stras was then inoeulaEed with a suitableorganisur, sueh as Aureobasidiuu pulrulans, ?. viride or s*ce1lulo1vtieun. A Iiquid culture or a sna1l portion of recyeledfernented straw eould be used as an inoculuu for the nextfernentation. (Fig. z.z shows a schenatie diagram of the firstprocess )
Fig-z-z sehenatic diagran of sori.d-state fernentation.
ヽ
1 . ousto′
. I . Jl|a?
-
: ;. nt..l,
I . ''e"
●
ヽヽ
Souree: Han et 41. , (Zg1
Copyright by Mahidol University
II. ',nr.ne● 2
The second process involved treatEent of the strawwith sodiuu hydroxide (42 dry wei.ght) and grolrth of filanentousfun6i on a seni-soIid substrate. The alkali-treated strarr was
neutlalized and a nit,roEren source such as anuoniun suLphate was
added.
A 2.10 [utlitivo Valuas gf. EgnE!.L Egltf gnd, Eggit
The nutritive values of fungal food/feed of a E iven
species of uicroorEanisn varied with the substrate used and thg
envilon[ent in rhieh it ras lrroHn. The funElal food produced on
pure solubilized carbohydrates would contain aore protein than
that produced on agricultural iraste Daterials.
However, the fungal biourass produced on such substrates
would be good enough for aniual feed and net protein utilization(NPU) was also higlh.
The anino acid conposition of fungal bionass fron variousspecies used to produce food,/feed fron agricultural flaste and
other carbohydrates Has conpared Hith that of alfalfa-a couuon
aninal fodder, soybean-a coauon protein source, and the FAO
reference as shosn in Table 2.2.
21
台
aCopyright by Mahidol University
へ‘
TabIe 2.2 Essential auino acid eonposition ofeeILu1olvticum, other cellulolytic organisns ofa1falfa, soya and FAO reference protein ( inprotein).
22
protein in e.-
SCP in teles t,7 total true
Auino
ac id
C.cellulo― F.`rani― L
l vI・ in"m naerun
viride Cellulo― Alfalfa
Elon as
Soy― FA0
bean(〓
Threonine 6. 14
Valine
Cystine
5.76
0.31
5.1
7.2
0.87
2.17
4.3
6.2
4.1
4.4
7.5
NA
4.9
4.4
1.45
1.35
3.5〕
5.3
3。 3
3.7
4.4
NA
4.70
6.79
0.41
1.69
4.12
8.66
2.41
3.69
8.0
NA
5.12
6.70
1.40
1.96
5.54
8.43
3.72
5.57
6:70
NA
4.0 2.8
5.0 4.2
1.4 2.0
1.4 2.2
5.4 4.2
7.7 4.8
2.7 2.8
5.1 2.8
6.5 4.2
1.5 1.4(/
ltethionine 2.33
Isoleucine 4.7O .
Leucine 7.54
Tyrosine 3.26
Phenylalanine 3 .77
Lysine 6.80
Tryptophan NA
Souree: Chahal (1)
NA = ueans not available
Fron Table 2.2, the conparison indicated that anino acideoopositi.on of all these species tret the FAO referencerequirenent except for sulphur-containing aoino acids - The
deficiency of sulphur auino acids couLd be easily net by
supplelenting the fungal pEotein aith aethionine.
らヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
(・ 23
ら
2. 11 Tandenav ei( Usinc If ater: Hvaclnth lgl lnhat Faadina
rf ater hyacinth ( Eiehhornia crassioes, art. ) is an
aquatic plant that is widely found in back-waters, swaltps,
canals, uarshes, and rivers. It can grow and reproduee so
rapidly that tareo and Bressani reported that only pair of erate!
hyacinth could be propagrated into 30 stalks within 23 days,
1,20O stalks nithin 4 nonths, and 930-2,900 stal ks,u hect are/yeat .
l{ater hyaeinth can E rolr peII when rrq.ter teuperature is bet}reen
28-30 c and pH betneen 4-8. If nater teDperature is higher than
40 c and pH is loner than 4 or higher than 10, the grolrth isdecreased as described by '*anapat and l{ongseron (2g). Because oftheir rapid growth, they can cause nany problens in tropical and
sub-tropical zones such as uakinE the rivers shallow and
obstructing navigation. In order to solve these probleus, rrater
hyacinth can be harvested and feruented with filanentous fungifor bioconversion into fungal bioaass rich in protein before use
for feeding aniqals such as ssine and ruuinant.
2. 12 Cheni cal Coroosition qf. f,3f.Or Hvaainth
l{anapat and lf onE sewon (ZS) studied the change innutritive value of sater hyacinth that are randouly collactedfrou swanps in urban area of (honkaen Eot L2 Donths between 1gg2-
1963. Rasu lts are shosn in Table 2.3.
〈●
ヘCopyright by Mahidol University
0´
24
Table 2.3 Chenical coaposition of irater hyaeinth in dry we.iElht
(D!{).
Nutrients Leaves Stalks
〔
ヽ
Dry oitter( Z )
Ash( z )
Ether extract(Z)
Crude fiber( Z )
Crude protein(Z)
EnergY( HJ,zKg )
CaIe iuu( Z )
Phosphorus( Z )
Hagnesiuu( Z )
Copper( og,/Kg )
I ron ( og,/Kg )
Zinc(ag,,/Ke)
15.9
15.5
3.7
17.8
19.0
17.96
2.16
0.50
0.34
3.67
670.00
33.00
6.4
16.5
1.8
30.9
4.8
15.28
1.76
0.31
0.37
3.34
420.00
24.00
●
Source: llanapat and l{ongsewon (29)
Results froa Table 2.3, shored thai water hyaeinth leaves
had higher nutritive .raIue than their stalks especially cruda
protein, calciuo and energy.
The nutritive value of .,rater hyacinth varied slightlythroughout the years. On the average, the nutritive values of
Ieaves and stalks in rainy seasons were higher than those in
sumDer seasons. Variation of nutritive value nas due to tiae,
うCopyright by Mahidol University
.1
part of the plant, and kind of Fater hyacinth as reported by Reza
and Khan (30). Furthernora, I{anapat and }longsewon (29) reported
that leaves and stalks of water hyaci.nth conlained low quantity
of heavy uetals and would not be poisonous to runinant aniuals.However, Lareo and Bressani reported in the year 1982 that 'raterhyacinth contained only sraaLl aEounts of an',. iphys io loEicalfactors such as tannins, with 12 Dl{ in stalks and 27, Dl{ in
leaves, and did not have other toxic substances such as saponins,
atkaloids, and tlypsin i.nhibitors. FurtherEore, it also
contained only 0.87 oxalate as deseribed by l{anapat and lJongsewon
(2s).
The vitamins and aaino aeids couposition of erater
hyacinth studied by 'Canapat and llonElsewon (29) are shown in Table
2.4. Results showed that erater hyacinth had vitaains B, A and
auino acids. Horeover, the leaves erere €Eood soulce of vitanin B
and B-carotene and also had high concentration of anino acids
espacially lysine <6.7 E/IOO g protein).
Because of its high nutritive value, water hyacinth couid
be used as E reen forage for ruuinant feeding. However, water
hyacinth had a lot of noisture, 90; in leaves, aore than g5Z in.stalks, and 86-952 in roots. ff aninals are fed large quantityof lhis green forage, the uoisture level Eight liuited theirintake and l,rsvsnt thea froD getting enough dry Eatter, and
hence, essential nutr j.ents.
25
(
ヽ
1 Copyright by Mahidol University
ら´ 26
Table 2.4 Vitanins and anino acids coaposition of water hyacinth.
Nutrients L e aves Stalks
Dry natter( Z )
T hiauin e
Ribof lavin
N iac in
Pantothenic ac id
B iotin
B-carotene
2.42
17.90
49.20
29.80
0.686
50.40
-― ―――――――g/1oo g protein
14.3
7.7
7.7
15.7
15.7
14.1
10.6
7.6
13.9
4.3
6_5
2.27
2.36
22.70
21.60
0.341
1.20
(dry matter)―――
3.7
1.7
1.9
3.2
3.4
3.1
2.1
15.9 6.4
---- /E/€ dry Datter-
ハ
AsparaEline
Threon ine
Ser ine
G 1u tauin e
+ Glyeine
Alanine
Val ine
Ilethionine
I so leuc ine
Leuc ine
Tyros ine
Phenylalanine
1.5
2.9
0.3
1.3
0ヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
ら´
Table 2.4 (continued)
27
Nutrients L e aves Stalks
H ist idine
Lysine
Arginine
Pro lineCystine
Tryp tophan
z- t
6.?
6.0
8.5
0.8
1.7
L.2
1.8t
Source: l{anapat and llongsewon (29)
Rattanavanich et a1 . , (31) regorted that ltreen r.ater
hyacinth was not good enouEh for feedinEi aniaals because of its
taste, odor, and the risk of being infected nith liver fIuka. In
order to solve these probleus, water hyacinth had to be feraented
sith !ilanentous fungi for bioconversion into funEial biooass rieh
in protein before use for aniual feading. By this Dethod, it
could help faruer save cost as well as iuProve averalre growth
tate/day and feed conversion efficiency. Furtheraore, feruented
erater hyacinth should be fed together with other rouE hages such
as rice straw since this practice could increase feed intake as
reported by Beza aad Kh".r (30).
'ranapat and 'Jongsewon (29) found that erater hvacinth eould
improve fleed value because of the fol),owing rsasons.
ヽ
f. ilater hyacinth were quite high in nutritive value,
Copyright by Mahidol University
ら´
ハ
28
especially its leaves erith an averaEfe crude protein up to 192 DT.
It also propagrated rapidly and could be produced in large
quantity to preserve for feedinEl animals in sunaer season.
2. !{ater hyacinth could be used as green or dry forage
for feedinEf anioals. Feraentation Has one possible process for
ilproving its nutritive value.
3. Using srater hyacinth for feeding ruuinants by
suppleaenting rith low quality rouElhages such as rice straer o!
dry Elrass nade aniual intake (in DH), feed conversion efficiency,
and an average grorrth rate/day higher than used only rice strar.
4. Optinun level for using water hyacinth in dry feed
that would not cause any E,loblens and loss of body laeight was
about 30-407 of whole dry feed.
In conclusion, feedinE trials rith various filaaentous
fungi used f,o produce fungal f ood,/feed are still in '"heir early
stages. However, uost of the feeding trials have indicated that
up to 20-40 Z of total protein requirenent can be rePlaeed with
the plotein frou these nieroorganisns without any pathological
probleas as reported by Peitersen (3). Although prelininary
feeding trials on rats have not shown any toxicity or
pathological syuptoas, extensive feeding trials are to be
arranged before it ean bc recouuended for hunan o! an ital
consuEp t ion .
^
0Copyright by Mahidol University
う´
CHAPTER I工 I
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.l An■ 1,ol● ュニ N=・ ●'1●
1●● ―
ユニE・La■ unal■LL
3. 1. 1 'Jater hyacinth
sunlight and put into oven at
powder lrith grinder.
t 3.L.2 Water hyacinth in 3.1.1 rere used for Proxirate
analysis using uethod of AoAC (32) to deteruine drv uatter, ether
extract, erude Plotein, ash, erude fiber and nitrogen-free
extract.
3.1,3 Fiber analysis was done to quantify the anounts
neutral-dEtergent fiber (l{DF), acid-deterglent f,iber (ADF)
acid-detergent lignin (ADL) using ihe uethod of Goering and
Soest (33).
3.2 Proeess g;l, Tatgr! l{vaa{nth ?eraantetLont+
3.2.1 l{ater hyacinth of norual size and those which had
been cut into t/4 of norual size (after drying by sunliSht and
putting in the oven for Preventing developnent of other
nieroorganisus) Eeae feroented Eith fil'-entous fuasi,g. ostreatus in 2 ]-ayet plastic bags. Inoculuu size of fungus
(plus nedie culture) used for feraentation Pere 52 and LOZ by
weight of water hyacinth. I'loisture eontenE of ferEentation lras
about 802 and water hyacinth used for feruentation ras 5 kg,/bag.
before feruentation lrere dried bY
80 c for 12 hours, then ground into
ば網Van
0Copyright by Mahidol University
へ・
●
30
3.2.3 Urea:Annoniun nitrate t.752 <114:100 g) were added
by diluting with 7.5 I water and Pouring into the bag :hrouEh
'rater hyaci.nth to be feraented with filanentous fungi. The
water was added to take lroisture content uP to 802 as described
by Khacharoen and X,hacharoen (34) that adding 18-20 I water into
1,000 kE silaEle increased uoisture by LZ- Thus, in this
experinent, lrate! was added at the tate of 0.1 l/5 kE silage to
take uoisture up 12.
3.2.4 Air nas chased fron the baE rhich was then tie.
After that, the silage was feruented for 25 days.
3.2.5 Randouized Couplete
assigning a feraented bag. Factors
factors and 2 leve1s with factor A =
5Z (AO) and 102 (A1) and factor B =
for fernentation laera norual size2
(81). Tleatuent coubination of 2
shorn as fo11ows.
Block Design was used forstudied were dividad into 2
inoculuu size of funEus Hele
size of water hyacinth used
(B0) and 1/4 of nornal size
factorial 2 replications is
Rep I AOBO A130 A031 A131
Rep II A131 AOBl A030 A130
3.3
…
an.r41● 1^n
…
3.3.1 The ErH ras checked everyday to study trend
lhroughout the experiaent.
0
Of pH
Copyright by Mahidol University
I31
3.3.2 Teuperature ras checked everyday by checking the
uiniauo-naxiaun arbient teaperature and in the piles of silaga in
the first 3 days. After that, using the niniruu-aaxinuu
tenperature as a points for checking teuperature in the piles of
si lage .
3.3.3 ltoistule flas checked everyday to control Boisture
throughout the experiuent.
a' 3.4 AnaJ*Sji.i g( f,utr'l tlva Valuas g.;f ?srltented flalg3 Hveointh
3.4.1 Saaple of 300 g within
taken on day 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25
OuarterinEl Hethod. Nunber of saaples
piles of silage Fere
feruentation by usin€
8 sanples/day.
eh
s
t
f
a
O W
3.4.2
into powder
value.
3.4.3
procedure to
l
h
l
t
A
̈ ・■W
saagles were dried in the oven, then ground
g!inder and kept for analysis of nutlitive
Alf samples in 3.4.2 rere analyzed by Rjeldahl
deteruine their protein contEnt.n
3.4.4 Sanples that contained high protein content erere
deterained when the tine used for ferEentation and protein
content received in silage after feraentation rrele also
eonsidered. The 4 optiuuu sauples wele selected frou aIItleatDcnts fsr 'groxitarte zna lTsis and fltle anal-ysis. The sarp le
that contained the highest protein content lras selected foranalysis of essential aaino acids (using Anino Acid Analyzer).
0Copyright by Mahidol University
ら
3.4.5 Essential aoino
3.4.4 was coupared to Z of
reference prote j.n as reported
ioprove nutritive va1ue.
3.5 Dtt e, AnalwrLs
3.5. 1 Plotein content
Analysis of Yariance (ANOVA)
treatDent lrere conpared by
(DURT).
in all sallp les were analyzed usinE
and ueans of protein content in each
using Danean's }luItiple Range fest
acids cooposi t ion
true protein ftoE
by Chahal ( 1) for
a.).)a
saarple in
and FAO
a trend to
in the
soybean
use as
A
3.5.2 llean of pH in each treatuent of feruentation was
presented for eaeh day throughout the experinent.
3.5.3 The uiniuuu-naxinuo tenperature of each tleat[entpresented for each day throughout the axperinent.
3.6 Caet Anelvrlt O!. Iatar Hveolnth FcrrcntetLon
3.6.1 Cost of water hyacinth feruentation produced froausing loca1 technology was evaluated by calculating cost pe! EraE
of erude protein of silage and then conpaled to the price pe!
grau of crude protein of, soybean neal.
0Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
ざ
扮
(
・
CH▲PTER IV
RESULTS OF THE STUDY
4。 1 ●`・ ‐1・・ l rAnnael,inn ュニ Inin, ll,■ ■lnih h●rn,0 ,0■・‐●n4・ ●|・ 16●
Water hyacinth around Mahidol Un■ vers■ty at Salaya Campus
were rando口 ly collected and sanples were analysed for the■ r
proxェコate compos■ tion and fiber content. The results of chem■ cal
analys■ s are shown in Table 4.1.
Table 4. 1 Chenical coaposition of Fater
fernentation (dry basis). (AVE. 0E 2 RIPS)
hyacinth before
Nut!ients Z dry weight
Proxinate coupos ition
Λ・
!toisture
Ash
Crude protein
Ether extract
Crude f iber
Nitrogen free extract
---- F ibcr
Acid detergent fiber( ADF )
Neutral detergent fiber(NDF)
Neutral detergent so lub le( NDS )
Acid detergent lignin(ADL)
Henice I Iu lose
4.80
18.28
9.69
2.39
21.57
43.27
●ontent ―――――――――
27.47
62.82
37.18
2.85
35.36
1 1:A31フ 15´ヘ
lツ941Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
34
'lr
Results fron TabIe 4.1 indicated that water hyacinth
before feraentation had crude protein approxinately g.69 Z but
had ethEr extract only 2.39 Z. I{hile its crude fiber content rras
quite high <2L.57 Z) that oade it a good feed soulce forrutinants. NDS nhich eonsists of pectin, anino acid, fat, nater
soluble earbohydrate, starch, soluble protein and non plotein
nitrogen that aniuals can use aluost totally sas 3?.18 Z. Ilhile
NDE ?rhich colprises cellulose, heaicellulose, liEnin, silica,keratin and tannin that only ruuinant aniEals can use because
nicroorgianisas present in their luDen can digest cellulose and
hericellulose, ras 62.AZZ. Furtheruore, it contained ADF and
heuieellulose 27.471. and 35.362, respectively rith only 2.A52
lignin. The lor ligni.n content rril.l provide' an advantaEe in
eel1ulose digestibility because li8nin and cellulose DoleculeE
usually bind together !.ith stlong bonds.
4.2 Sileca Condition batsaen Farnantation
/\ {.2.1 pH condition
The pH value of the wate! hyacinth biouass during 25
days fernentation exhibited a decreasing trend fron the first day
until the end of ferncntation. The aean pH valuer of 25 days
rrater hyacinth ferBentation frou 4 t!eataents and overall Ee8ns
of pH during 25 days feruentation are shown in Table 4.2 and
Figures 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5.
0Copyright by Mahidol University
35
Table 4.2 The pH ueans and overall aeans of 25 days water
hyacinth feruentation of 4 treattrents (AVE. OF 2 REpS)
Treatren tsDav
AOB0 AOBl A130 A131
,r
1
z
3
4
5
E
7
8
s
10
11
72
13
t4
15
16
17
18
19
20
ZL
6.90
6.70
6. 25
6.00
5.85
5.60
5.50
5.50
5 .40
5.30
5.30
5. 30
5.20
5.00
4. E0
4.60
4.65
4.55
4.40
4.45
4. 35
6.95
6 .65
6 .40
6. 15
5.80
s.75
5.75
5.65
5.45
5.35
5.35
5. 35
5.30
5. 10
4. 35
4.80
4.80
4.65
4.60
4.55
4.45
6.80
6.60
6.25
6.10
5.65
5.60
5.60
5.55
5.55
5.80
5.80
5.70
5.70
5.20
4.90
4.?5
4.65
4.65
4.60
4.45
4.35
6.80
6. 60
6.50
6.25
5.75
5. ?5
5.60
5.60
5.30
5. 10
5. 10
s.05
5.05
4. SO
4.85
4.80
4.65
4.85
4.65
4.80
4.70
()
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
Table 4.2(continued)
36
Treatren tsDay
▲030 A031 A130 AlBl
^
22
23
24
25
4.20
4.00
3.85
4.00
4.40
4.20
3.95
3.95
4.75
4.75
4.75
4.85
4.35
4.25
4.25
4.10
ll ean
RanEe
5。 10 5.35
3.35-6.90 3.95-6.95
5.25 5.25
4.10-6.80 4.65-6.80
4・
The pH range during 25 days water hyacinth
of 4 treatments ( A030, AOBl, AlBO and A131) were
3.95-6.95, 4.10-6.80 and 4.65-6.80, respectivoly.
ieans of AOBO, A031, AlBO and AlBl treatments during
were 5.10, 5.35, 5.25 and 5.25, respectively.
fernentation
3.85-6.90,
The o▼erall
fernentation
4.2.2 lcupcrature condltfuin
The teEperature of silage varied depending upon aDbient
t,enperature of each day. Uiailu.u 4g6[ aawinrrrrn values oJ 2'''hieot
te[perature and 4 tleatnents during 25 days fertrentation are
shown in Tables 4.3,4.4 and Figures 4.6, 4.7, 4.8,4.9 and 4.10.
The overall ueans of BiniEuD and uaxinuu teupelatules fron each
treataent during 25 days ferEentation are shown in Figura 4.11.
ACopyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
37
FIGURE 斗.l MERNS OF PH FRCM TRERTMENT80BO BL・RING FERMENT∩ T10N (25 3RYS)
■7マ〕一r一・―一nunフ
n●
『″r
′り
『∵4・「■
つ
一́1■∩)
■‥■
●1■
■‥一■14
4‥ュ
(ぎ
卿 Graph Cnv督 Oo3o
覇 Graph BRo8o II
出 Gr二ph RRcBo I
ヽロ
4 69 11 13 15 17 1_9 21 23 25
3 10 12 14 16 13 20 22 24
Dags
^
肴↑
Copyright by Mahidol University
う
38
(一
・4■”4)
「/一11一n=〓oフ■つリニ7・~
′3)E■)“4
,、)う′一■‐ム
口^)
1■〓・4il一1■一1
■
FIGむRE 432 NEFNS OF PH FRC‖ TRERTNENTRCBl Dじ RING FこRMENTST10N (25 B∩ YS)
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 252 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
園 Craph CRvg OcBi
ヨ■■GrこPh 3RoBi II
― Craph R∩oBi I
D翡5
^
^ヽヽ
ヨ S l量 当 i尭 菫 _________― 一 一里む 事■ ユ ■ ョ
一 、 攀 丑
= t
Copyright by Mahidol University
有
39
FIF」bRE 4.3 MERNS OF PH FROM TREnRMENTRlBO DURING FERMENTRTION (25 D∩ YS)
(一
“キう0
(こ
1■
〔り0フ●0つr
′O
LJ■■7●
つ」1・^(U
l
■
1
■
1
■
1
■
■1
…GraPh Cnvg niB0
‐ Graph BRi8o II
y//1GrこPh RRiBc I
1 3 5 F 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 252 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Dags
^)
PH
呻 h。 こ 凸 ‐ ―
0Copyright by Mahidol University
(
一
40
A,
ユ,
,0
う‘
1l
nUq′oO
,r
′0
ヽ0“■
,0うこ
1
^^U
■―ム■1一■
・一■―一■‥一
FIGURE l.4 MERNS CF PH FRCM TRERTHElklTRlBl DURING FERMENTRT10N (25 DRYS〉
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 252 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Bacs
剛測Graph Cni31 Rv9.
ヨ|ICrapin 3‖lBi II
』■■■■ヽGraph RRiBi I
●
0
PH
三JiLnョ ロ瓢.1_1_1 ■
凛製題田麒書癬轟 ,
Copyright by Mahidol University
ら
ハ
41
FIGURE 4.5 0VER∩ LL MERNS OF PH FROMEnCH TRERTMENT DURING FERMENTRT10N
■■
”0
つ
』
■工
nU
Oフ
〔0
つr
′h)〓J
■■
つ、vうこ
■l
n〕
1
一1
一1
●1
1
▲ Graph DR13i
X GraPh Cni3o
口 Graph 8RcBi
X GraPh RncB0
10oBo RoBi niBO
Treatment5
RiBi
うヽ
0
(25 DRYS)
Copyright by Mahidol University
^
42
Table 4.3 l{iniuun and uaxinun values ofduring 25 days feruentat ion
aarbient telperature
Day ll in iuuu-lla-riuun Tenperature( C) H ean
■
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
25.9-32.0
26.0-32.0
24.0-31=0
24.5-33.0
26.0-34.0
26.0-34.5
25.0-34.0
24.0-33.0
25.0-34.0
27.0-34.0
26.0-33.0
27.0-34.0
26.0-34.0
26.0-35.0
26.0-35.0
26.0-35.0
25.5-34.5
25.5-34.5
26.8-35.0
29.0
29.0
27.5
28.8
30.0
30.3
29.5
28.5
29.5
30.5
29.5
30.5
30.0
30.5
30.5
30.5
30.0
30.0
30_9
^t
意Copyright by Mahidol University
〔
・
T,hlo 4 3(cont inued)
43
Day ll in inuu-llaxinuu Tenperature( C) Mean
^
20
21
22
23
24
25
25.5-35.0
25.1-34.0
25.0-35.5
25.0-33.0
25.0-32.0
24.0-31.0
30.3
29.6
30.3
29.0
28.5
27.5
llean 25.5-33.7 29.6
Table 4.4 ll in inuu and naxiuun
25 days fernentalion (AVE. 0F
of 4 treataents duringtemperatures
2 REPS)
Treatnents^ Day
AOB0 AOBl A130 A131
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
27.00-33.00
26.30‐ 33.50
26.00-32.00
28.25-34.00
29.50-35.50
30.00-35.75
30.50-35.60
27.45-33.10
27.00-33.55
26.10-32.30
29.00-34.10
29.55-36.40
29.75-35.75
30.40-35.50
27.15-33.00
27.00-33.50
26.25-32.40
29.15-34.00
29.50-36.40
30.00-36.20
30.50-36.00
27.25-33.00
23.75-33.50
26.25-32.50
23.75‐ 34.30
29.75-36.15
30.30-36.60
30.50-36.90
0Copyright by Mahidol University
(
)
TabIe 4.4( cont j.nued )
44
T reatuen tsDay
A030 AOB■ A130 A131
ハ
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
【)
30.50-35.60
30.50-35.80
31.00-35.80
31.00-36.50
31.25-37.25
3■ .00-37.50
31.10-37.60
31.25-37.75
31.10-37.95
31.40-38.00
31.25-37.75
31.65-38.00
31_45-37.85
31.50-37.85
31.30-37.95
31.35-38.00
31.35-38.00
31.30-37.85
30.35-35.50
30.75-35.90
30.80-35.80
31.00-36.75
31.00-38.00
3■ .00-38.00
31.15-38.10
31.50-38.25
31.55-38.40
31.60-38.35
31.55-38_30
31.75-38.45
31.50-38_30
31.55-38.25
31.45-38.35
31.50-33.45
31.65-38.55
31.50-38.40
30.50-36.00
30.50-36.00
30.50-36.50
31.00-36.50
31.00-37.25
31.00-37.40
31.00-37.60
31.15-37.75
31.25-37.80
31.20-37.75
31.20-37.65
31.40-37.75
31.15-37.60
31.20-37.70
31.15-37.75
31.25-38.20
31.30-38.10
31.25-38.10
30.50-36.65
30.50-36.40
31.00-36.50
31.00-37.00
31.00-37.75
31.00-37.75
31.00-38.00
31.10-38.10
31.25-38.30
31.25-38.30
31.10-30.20
31.25-38.40
31.05-38.20
31.15-38.60
31.20-38.55
31.25-38.50
31.35-38.55
31.40-38.50
l{ean 30.37-36.50 30.49-36.10 29.71-36.59 30.35-37.00
0Copyright by Mahidol University
(
)45
FКURE課珈
硼 P師 駅E EURttGN (25 DRYS)
Temleraiure (qQ
^
40
蕊
■
25
m
15
10
5
0
-Graph C
fvg Temp
.,...Graph BMax TernP
-GraPh fl
l4ln TemP
54 6 8 1♂
11」3141161181Tち∫ち√
DaЧ
八
iri´ '‐ '・`` 1`1・・・
1●:´ '・ `
0こ
0Copyright by Mahidol University
(ι
46
ハ 0030
25
20
15
10
5
0
FIGURE 4.7 MININUM ∩ND NRXIMU‖TEMPERnTURE OF TREnTMENT 80BO Bじ RING25 D∩YS FERMENT∩T10N (RVE. OF 2 REPS)
40
`●●■●■■●●J・ 0・■・̀́ J゛゛゙口・・・■・・̀ロ
ロ■・・・●●●●●●●0● 0・口・・ロロ・・・口「 _
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 252 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
.rJoY3
●●●●●Craph BMax TemP
一 Craph ∩Min T鞭
【′
ξCopyright by Mahidol University
へι
47
FICURE 4.3 MINIMUM RND NRXINUMTEMPERRTURE CF TRERT,lENT ROBl Dじ RING25 ERYS FERMEi・lTRT10N (RVE. OF 2 REPS)
^
35
m25
m15
10
5
0
Graph Bi''!ax Temp
Graph HMin Temp
ヽ
4 69
8 1019 21
13 2013 15 17
12 14 16
DaJs
52
4
郎
2 22
^
うヽ
得
Copyright by Mahidol University
へ‘ 48
FICURE 4.9 MINIMUM ∩ND MRXIMUHTEMPERnTURE OF TRERTMENT R180 Dじ RING25 DRYS FERMENTRT10N くRVE. CF 2 REPS)
^
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
3
.....Graph Bl'!ax Temp
-GrEPh H
Mi n Tor'ror.*r r rltriF
04 6
9 11 13 15 17 19 218 10 12 14 16 18 20
T1-, ,-Ucl}J3
52
4
一′●
2
2
2
^
0
4o:
…′..口 ..口 .● ●●●口゛●口■●´JJ口・ 口●●●口■●●0000● ●口●0● 口●●●0●口●●
・・・●■●
I rrrtrrrt'
Copyright by Mahidol University
へ
・
49
面
コ
A・/
FIGURE 4510 MINIHじM 8NB MRXI‖UMTENPERRTURE CF TRERTHENT R181 DURING25 DRYS FERNENTRT10N (RVE. OF 2 REPS)
40
rr.r.""ttr.trt""t"",.t"rr'r"'tr"l'i,.t"'r"t'!"
″25
20
15
10
5
0
.....llpp6i1 P
|'4ax Temp
-Graph H
Min Temp
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 252 4 5 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
n-,,-UclY)
^
^
Copyright by Mahidol University
50う
・
FlGURE 4.11 0VERRLL NE∩ NS CF MININUMPND i・
48XINUH TEMFER∩TじRE FRCM EPCH
TREnTMENT EURING 25 DRYS FERNENTRT10N
45
40
GraPh GMin niBi
Craph FMax niBo
Graph EMin ni3o
Graph DMax PoBi
Craph CMin RoBi
Craph BMax 8o8o
Graph ∩Min ∩OBO
● ■̈)
一U 『)
(U ヽ)
一n〉
『)
〓H)
つ0 「0 つ』
(/一 1■ ・1一
Min HinRo3o oBi
ほR
愉漱
Hin Ri3o8oBi Nlax
RiBiHax ni3ih
i3。R
Treatment5
八ヽ
ヘ
,ご く=ri_i
■こ こ ■7
ー X』0・
●4・
0●U.■
V
OLI.3n_
υ .7 OU.■●
Copyright by Mahidol University
へご
51
Results frou Table 4.3 indicated that the uiniuua and
aaxiuun values of anbient te,perature varied du:ing zs dEys
fer'entation. The anbient te,perature range for 2s daysfernentation r.as zs.s-38.7 c. The overall Desns of aobientteuperature during feruentation nas 2g.6 C.
Results frou Table 4.4 shoned that, the Diniauu and
naxinun te[peratures of 4 treatnents varied accordingly with+ anbient te,perature. The uiniuua and uaxiauq tenperature leans
of A0B0, A081, A1B0 and A1B1 treatrents were 30.32_36.80, 30.49_36.10, 29.71-36.Sg and 30.35-32.00 C, respectively.
{.3 Plotain Contant i!. Iatcr llvaointh 1;!!g3 ?er.taa}rtInn
4!.3. 1 Protein oontent
After feruentation of water hyacinth for ZS days,
saapres were taken by quatering nethod and anarysed for proteincontent using Kjerdahl aethod at the Departaent of Science
i. Service, I{inistry of Science, Technology and Energy. The Deans
of protein content rrere co[pared using Dancan's !{u]ti,ple Ranle
Test(Dl{RT). The resurts are shonn in Table 4.s and Figure 4.12.
ヘ
Copyright by Mahidol University
へ二
う‘
Eυ
Table 4.5 Protein cOntent(2) in
fernentatiOn.(AVE. OF 2 REPS).
Day T reatDen t Z Protein* Z Protein increased
water hyacin th after
●
0
5
5
5
5
10
10
10
10
15
15
15
15
20
20
20
20
25
25
25
25
a
ab
b― f
a― d
a― e
a
C―g
a― e
b― f
efg
a―d
fg
b― f
g
b― f
d―g
b― f
ab
abc
b― f
a― e
Contr。 1
A030
■OBl
A130
AlBl
A030
A031
A130
A131
AOB0
△OB l
▲lB0
AlBl
△030
A031
A130
AlBl
AOB0
A031
A130
A13■
9.69
10.15
10.30
10.40
10.50
9.70
11.05
10.50
10.60
11.35
10.35
11.45
10.60
10.80
10.85
11.10
10.65
10.15
10.19
10.75
10.55
4.75
11.46
7.33
8.36
0.21
14.04
8.36
9.36
17.13
6.81
18.16
9.36
21,78
11.97
14.69
9.91
4.75
5.26
10 94
3.38
^
ハヾ
Ietter are notx in a coluan, ueans followedsignificantl.y different at the 52
by a connon
Ievel by Dl.lRT
Copyright by Mahidol University
0
・
53
FICURE 4.12 PROTEIN CONTENT (イ ) INURTER rlYRCINTH ∩FTER FERMDiiTRTICN
くRVE. OF 2 REPS)
●□ Graph E
R131
図 CFaph D8130
囲 GrこPh CRCBl
蛇摯期GraPn 3RC80
ヨ GraPri nCONTROL
A
20
^
Copyright by Mahidol University
ら
・
54
Results froo Table 4.5 sholred thatcontent in all sanples taken at 5, 10, 15,
feruentation increased when conpared r{ithsanple). The nagnitude of increasing ino.2L-2t.782.
the averaEle protein
20 and 25 days of
contro 1( pre-treatedprotein content Has
ヘ
The plotein content in silage at S, 10, 15, Z0 and Zs
davs fernentation were anarysed usin6 Analysis of variance(aNOvA)( see appendix A) . . The results showed that wate! hyacinthferaented 10 and 15 days increased in protain contentsi6nificantly(P<0.05). The results are shown in Tables 4.6, +.2,4.8 and 4.9.
TabIe 4.6 Analysis of Varianee of protein content in llate!hyacinth 10 days feruentation.
FMSSSDFSV
^
Rep l icationT reatuent
A
.BAB
Error
1
3
0.0300
1.8785
0.0595
1.0440
0.7750
0.0330
0.0300
0.6262
0.0595
1.0440
0.7750
0.0110
2.73ns
56.93**
5.41ns
4.00ns
70.46**
1
1
1
Total 1.9416
ヘ
** = significant at lχ level
Copyright by Mahidol University
0一
55
Table 4.7 Table Of treatnent neans fOr prote■n content lo days
fernentatiOn.(AVE. oF 2 REPS)
Treataent l,leans
(c
AOB0
A031
AlB0
A131
9.71a
ll.05o
10.50b
10.60b
SV DF ss
争 ReplicatiOn l o.o312 0.0312 0.42ns
In a colunn, [eans follorred by a coltnon lelter are notsignificantly different at the SZ level by DllRT.
Table 4.8 Analysis of variance of protein content in water ,
hyacinth 15 days fernentation.
T r eataen t 3 1.7837 0.5946 7.97ns
1 0.0613 0.o613 0.82ns
l l.7113 1.7113 22.94*
1 0.0112 0.0112 0.15ns
3 o.2238 o.o746
FMS
A
B
AB
Error
Total 7 2.0387
^
x = significant at 52 level
Copyright by Mahidol University
(
一 56
daysTable 4 9 Table of
fernentation.(AVE.
treatコ ent neans
OF 2 REPS)
for protein content 15
Treatuen t means
AOB0
A031
A130
A131
11.35b
10.35a
ll.45b
10.60aら“
In a coluun, aeans followed by a conlon letter are not
significantly differEnt at the 57 level by DllRT.
The results frou Table 4.6 illustrated that the ANOVA ofprotein content of wata! hyacinth after 10 days feruentation gave
highly si6nificant effect of interaction betgeen the 2
factors(P<O.01). This neans that both length and inoculua size
strongly affected the resulting protein contont aft6rferaentation and qust be considered jointly. The response of 2
-̂' factols or th6 interaction due to changas in both dilection and -uagnitude of lesponses are shonn in Figures 4-13 and 4.L4,
' respectively. Tab1e 4.8 shored the ANOVA of ptotein content of
rrater hyacinth after 15 days feruentation. There lras a
significant Bffect (P<0.05) of only factor B shich indieated
that Errotein content of the fernented nater hyacinth was affected
by length of lrater hyacinth used in feraentation but not the
inoculuu size of fungus.
^)
Copyright by Mahidol University
0)
57
一一一十́コ
・′・コ一一一
一一一一一一
〓~卜JT=■■1lTTi‐ |■ ■:= Tl■ 7_=
]二貫EIT二 :]| :]F 言三=F:I卜
|=三
0
「一」一】
「一一一「【一F
一こr,・̈
一
一‐」一二一一【‘
墨一「
c:.f-:--
´,.
一
一一一
一一〓
〔
ヽ
●
‘卜
」,,,P,,一
,一
‐
一,
一ヽ
一二
‘
一
一・・,
一
一一
一』ざ
:書 .三 モそ」誓:
l:
Copyright by Mahidol University
の)
58
一・一一一一「
・ぃ。一す一華
一‐
一
〓
」「一一一
一
「一「一
彙一〓
〔F〓ヽ
〓r; ¨ヽ,一
一‘』〓「】一一
‥
一・‥〓
‥
一‥
■,・‥
一
‥
↑
‥」
Γ‥〓
‥
・1一, 一
‥
〓
‥
卜
;
■
・L
l
〓
ハー.〓 一「〓 一”〓
う
1暑=』
― 七「
二「
員
二‘「一一
《ぎ
●一
Copyright by Mahidol University
6) 59
4.4 CheglC-a,I Couoosition 9;f { Ootinun Sane.leg
Four optinun saaples that, contained hiEh protein contentnere selected rhen the tiae used for feruentation and proteincontent received in si1a6e after felDentation rere alsoconsidered. The 4 optiuun sanples were 4081, A1B1 of 10 days
feraentation and A0B0, A1B0 of 15 days.feluent,ation. All sanples
were analysed for their proxinate conposition and fiber eontent.The 'results are shown in Table 4.10.
6
^
●Copyright by Mahidol University
へ〓
60
Table 4.10 Chemical
くdry basis) (AVE.
compos■ tiOn of control and 4
0F 2 REPS)
optiDu[ sanples.
Nutr ien tTreatDen ts
10 days Fermented 15 days FernentatedCONTROL ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
▲OBl ▲131 AOBO AlB0
^′ヽ
Hoisture
Ash
Crude protein
Ether extract
Crude f iber
NFE
ADF
NDF
NDS
ADL
llenicellulose
4.81a
18.28a
9.69a
2.39a
21.57b
43.27d
27.47a
62.82b
37.18日
2.35a
35.36ab
5.00a
19.97c
ll.05c
3.00c
■9.72a
41.26●
28.59a
63.08b
37.12a
3.02a
34.49ab
4.34a
18.94b
ll.35cd
2.55ab
22.12bc
41.83●
29.51a
61.04a
38.97b
2.87a
31.52a
4.86a
20.65d
ll.45d
2.80bc
22.16bc
39.04b
28.10a
63.89b
36.1la
2.87a
35.79b
5.05a
21.89e
10.60b
2.99c
22.94c
36.52a
28.00a
59.60a
40.40b
3.00a
31.59aら
In a row, Deans followed by a eonnon lette! are not significantlydifferent at the 5Z level by DHRT.
Results fron Table 4.10 shored that after 10 days of
feruentation, the A0B1 and A1B1 treatuents rlave the highestprotein content, This indicated that using inoculuE size ofPun6us 5Z(A0) and 102(A1) feruented with L/4 of norual length ofwat,er hyacinth(B1) yielded the highest protein content (P<0.05).
●¨
Copyright by Mahidol University
う
61
The protein content, when conpared with control,L4.O4Z and 9.362, respect ive Iy.
increased
ら
After 15 days of ferrentation, the AOBO and AlBO
treatuents gave the highest protein content. This resultsuggested that when inoculun size of fungus SZ(AO) .and 1OZ(A1)
were used in feruenting noraal length of water hyacinth(B0), thehighest protein content Has obtained(p<0.05). The proteincontent, when conpared Trith control, ras increased L?,13l. and
18. 162, respectively.
. Ash and ether extraet in all treatnents exhibited an
increasing trend(P<0.05), while ADF and ADt ,rere notsignificantly different(P>0.05) when conpared with control.
CF, NDE, NDS and hericellulose content of silage rhenferuented 10 and 15 days shoned little change. I{oreover, thechange of these nutrient coEponents was inconsistent throughoutthe period of fernentation.
{.5 Pettarn qL Afine. Ag.idE i!. Ieter f,y1g[af[ a!tq3 Farncnrrrton
The optinuu sanple (A180 of 15 days ferrentation) rhichcontained the highest protein content was serected for essentiaranino acids anarysis. Pattern of amino acids in lrater hyacinthafter feraentation and the coBparison nith soybean and FAO
reference were shovrn in Table 4.11.
(一
ri Copyright by Mahidol University
^ 62
TabIe 4. 11
f ernen tat i on
(Z total true
P at t6rn
snd the
protein )
of aBino acids
conparison rithin water
soybean and
hyacinth afterFAO reference.
Auino acids llater hyacinth+Eungus soybean FAO
ら,
Threon ine
Va l ine
Ile thion in e
Iso leucine
L euc ine
Tyros in e
Pheny IaLan ine
Lysine
Cyst ine
Trypt ophan
3.2
4.7
0.8
3.9
6.8
2.5
3.2
5.3
0.9
o.2
4.0
5.0
1.4
5.4
?.?
2.7
5.1
6.5
1.4
1.5
2.8
4.2
2.2
4-2
4.8
2.8
2.8
4.2
2-O
1.4
a Results frou Table 4.11 indicated that the auino acid
conposition of wate! hyacinth afte! ferDentation Det the FAo
reference requireuent exceErt for su lphur-eontain ing auino acidssuch as uethionine and cystine, and tryptophan.
4.8 Cost Q;E latar }lwrclnth ?ertentrtion
According to this study, the experiDent was carried outon a laboratoly sca1e. To obtain a reliable production cost, th6production cost per kg should be calculated fron the data based
^ご
Copyright by Mahidol University
う)
ら
63
on couuarcial scale using local technology. Soue data presented
in this part lreEe collected at Arunyik llushroou Faru inNakornpathou Province and eoubined with the data froq thisexperinant for use in the calculation of produetion cost.
The production Errocess can be explained in brief as
f ollorrs:
Hater hyacinth around the canpus nere collected, cutinto L/4 of norual lenEth and norual lenEth rere dried by
sunlight. After that, they were put in the pressure-steau cooker
for elinination of other nicroorgan islrs and then feraented by
adding stock culture and chenicals.
In this study, the production cost per kg of si.Iage lras
calculated based on the follorinE pala.ltet6rs;
4.8. 1 Fixed costs
4.6.1.1 Fernenting house (8x12x6 D.), Eade frouwood, banboo and covered nith dry-grass, costed about 10,OOO
n baht.
4.6.1.2 S tean- tank( capac ity 200 1. ), used oi1 tank,costed about 500 baht .
4.6. 1.3 Furnace ( lx1x1 n. ), constructed by usingbrick and cenenting agent, costed about 300 baht.
A11 equipuent used rare estinated to hava rrorking
life of 5 yeacs.
4.6.2 Var■ able cOsts
4.6.2.l Material cost
へご
Copyright by Mahidol University
164
- stock culture or inoculun, price = 4
baht,/bottle with 1 bottle containingl inoculuu = 2OO 8.
- plastic sheets (size 6x10 n. and 8:(12
D-), price = 5 baht,/a. and have working Li?e L/2 veat.
- urea, Price = ? baht/kg.
- aanoniua nitrate (NH N0 ), Price = LZ43
baht,/kEl.
4-6.2-2 Transportation cost ( data obtained fron
, Arunyik l{ushroou Faru).
4.6.2-3 Labour eostr was. calculated based on
Diniuun nage level in Bangkok (93 baht,/day).
- One person was required for collecting wate!
hyacinth Iabout t,SAke/dav as rePorted bv Rattanavanieh et aI .
(311.1, for a duration of 2 days.
-Cutting and spreading erater hyacinth for sun-
dry, for a duration of 2 days.
-DryinE rrater hyacinth (dry weiEht of irate!
hyacinth about 60 kg/day), for a duration of 5 davs.
' -Putting lrater hyacinth into the Pressule
cooker, for a duration of 1 day.
-FeraentinE water hyacinth and collectinEi after
feraentation, for a duration of 10 or 15 days.
4.6.2.4 lf ater cost, lras calculated based on the3
Hetropolitan If ater Supply rate. 'ilater used was 0.180 u totallv.
As illustrated in Table 4.L2, t}re total production cost
per kEi of feraented water hyacinth was about 18.54, 1Sl .54, 22.82
and 23.82 baht for t!eatuents A0B1, A181, A0B0 and A180,
Copyright by Mahidol University
(〓
65
respectively. This price was hiE her than the price ofsoybean ueal which was about g.g0 baht,zkg [ayerage priceyear 1990 as reported by p iyasuntrarongse (35)1.
l kg
in the
Ihen c。 ■pared the pr■ ce per gra口 OF crude prote■ n, it was
found that the price per gran of fernented water hyacinth [ 0.168
(AOBl), 0.184 (A131), 0.201 くAOBO)and O.208 くAlBO〉 baht ] was
higher than that of soybean meal (o.025 baht) Esoybean meal hadう 35χ orude protein as relcrted by Khacharoen and Khacharoen (34)].
Table 4.12 The productJ.on cost pe! kg of feroented waterhyacinth at 10 and 15 days.
Fixed cost Baht/kg Variable cost Baht/kg
1. Fe ruen t ing
-10
-15
S t ean- tan k
Fu rnace
house
days
days
0.457
0.685
0.002
0.00■
1. Inoculuu
-used 5Z
-used 102
2. Plasti.c
-10 days
-15 days
3. Urea
4. NH NO43
5. Transportation cost
6. Labour cost
-10 days
-15 days
?. llater cost
^
2
3
1.000
2.000
0.356
0.534
0.170
0.240
0.310
15.500
19.375
0.003
Ar
Copyright by Mahidol University
(・
Table 4.12 roontinued)
66
う
TOtal -lo days O.460 TOtal -lo days
-used inoculuu 52 = 19.0?g
-used inoculuu 102= 19. OZS
-15 days 0.688 -i5 days
-used inoeulun 57 = ZZ.LB?
-used inoculun 102= ZS . LAz
ToTAL PRoDUCTION PER KG.(rO DAYS) = O.4O + 18.08 = 1A.S4 BAHT,/KG.
AND = 9.46 + 19.08 = 19.54 BAHT,/KG.
ToTAL PR0DUCTION pER KG.(rS DAyS) = 0.69 + 22.!3 = ZZ.B2 BAHL/KG. i
AND = 0.69 + 23.13 = 23.82 BAHT,/KG. l
THI PRTcT P■ R tt Qュ CRUDE PROTFTN rDRV wETF7HTヽ Qn IATRP
HYACTNTH FTRH■ NTATToN AND SOYBEAN MEAL
TREATMENT AOBl (10 DAYS)= 18.54 = 0.168 BAHTノ G.
110.5
TREATMENT A131 (10 DAYS)= 19.54 = 0.184 BAHT/G.
106.0
TREATMENT A030 (15 DAYS)= 22.32 = 0.201 BAHT/G.
113.5
TREATMENT A130 (15 DAYS)= 23.82 = 0.208 BAHT/G.
114.5
SOYBEAN MEAL = 8.80 = 0.025 BAHT/G.
^
350.0
^r
Copyright by Mahidol University
(・
D/f
If faruers do feruentation process theuselves or using
their own labour, the cost of fernented water hyacinth production
will deerease to 3.04,4.O4,3.45 and 4.45 baht,/kg for tleatrentsA081, 4181, A0B0 and A180, respectively because the labour cost
would be excluded frou the calculation. The cost per E rau ofcrude protein of feruented water hyaeinth produetion will also
decrease as fo l lows;
Treatnent AOBl (10 days)= 3.04 = 0.028 baht/g.
0.038 baht/g.
0.030 baht/g.
0.039 baht/g.
Treatuent A1B1
■14.5
THE PRTC■ P■ , CMH Qユ CPiint PROTEIN TNCP'ASIn QE WATER HVACTNTH
AFT,R F■ RH■NTATTON
ら) 110.5
(10 days)= 4.04 =
106.0Treat■ len t ▲030 (15 days)= 3.45 =
113.5Treatnent AlBO (15 days)= 4.45 =
In this part, the priee pe! glaD
I increased of water hyacinth after feraentation S
f
a
O W
crude protein
calculated by
axcluding labour cost and transErortation cost. Thus, cost of
feraented erater hyacinth production ri11 equal to 2-23, 3-23,'2.64 and 3.64 baht,/kg for treatrents A081, A181, AOB0 and A180,
respectively. The price pe! graE of crude protein ineraased offeruented water hyacinth production are shown belor;
TreatDent A0B1 (10 days), plotein content of 1009
of sater hyacinth increased = 11.05-9.69 = 1.38g, (Data froutable 4.5), eost used for protein increased = 2.23 baht. The
●Copyright by Mahidol University
68
plice per Eflan of crude protein incraased, = 2-23 = 0.18 baht/E.
13.6
Treatuent A1B1 (10 days), protein conten-. of 10CC
of lrater hyacinth increased = 10.60-9.69 = 0.918, eost used forprotein increased = 3.23 baht. the price pcr gralr of crude
plotein i.ncreased = 3.23 = 0.35 baht,/g.
9.1
TreatEent AOBO (15 days) = 2-84 = 0.15 baht/6.
18. 6
and TreatDent A1BO (15 days) = 3.64 = 0.20 baht,/g.
L7 .A
へ´
(‘
,Copyright by Mahidol University
ハ
へ´
DISCuSsloN,
CHAPTER ▼
CONCLuS10N AND
,●●1■ 1,●
RECOMHENDAT10N
5r 1 DLscussLon c,;L th.
Fro[ the study on inprovenent in the feed value of wate!
hyacinth by fernentation rith filauentous fungi, the results can
b€ discussed as foIlons:
5.1.1 In this experinent the losses of nutrient during
feruentation of water hyacinth uiEht be due to the followingreasons:
. 5. 1. 1. 1 The Losses of nutrients in nater hyacinth
during harvest and pleparation. In this experiuent, water
hyaeinth irere dried by sunli6ht at least 2 days for reducing
noisture content. This process caused the losses of dry Eatt6!
such as stareh and protein rhich were hydrolysed into sugars and
auino acids as reportad by llanapat (36). Therefore the protein
content in r.ater hyacinth after felDentation increased only
slightly when cougared with pereentoge of protein in water
hyacirith before feraentation (control).
5.1.1.2 The losses of nutrients due to respirationand fernentation losses. The losses caused by d irlest ive-j u icsactivity in plant and nicroorganisu that digested starch intocarbondioxide and water in aErobie condition dur.ing feruantationbecause the surface of silage was in contact with oxygen.
5.1.2 In addition, the protein content in nater
hyacinth after feruentation was sliEhtly increased rhEn conpared
^
(ピ
Copyright by Mahidol University
へヽ 7A
:
with eontrol due to the fo l lowinEg 'reasons:
5.1.2.1 The growth of fungus during feruentatior.Has poor. It uight be dependent upon technique of fernentation
that rras not an aseptic technique and contauinated by othar
Dieroorganisns chich prevented or interfered with tha growth of
A
fungus.
5.7.2-2 The loss of leaves
du!ing drying by sunlight and sangling
5.1.3 The teupbratura in the silage
was also high in accordance Fith aubient
condition EiEiht affected the growth of fungus.
of wate! hyacinth
of the saaples.
durinE ferrentatj.on
tauperature. This
5.1.4 The alrino acid eoaposition of Bater hyacinth
after fernentation rras deficient of su lphur-con tain inE auino
acids. This was a liuitation in the application of funEal
protein. The biolo6ical value of fungal protein ras lower than
that of soybean and it was also deficient of su lphur-contain ing
auino acids. Horever, the deficiency of su Iphur-con tain ing a[inor̂' acids could be easily Eet by supplenentinEl the fungal protein
rith aethionine.
5.1.5 In this eiperiaent, the replication used rras
only 2 replications due to liuited resources. Thus the degree
of freedou of replication was low (one) and it affected the value
of l{ean Square (}lS) rhich was 1or, too.
5.1.5 In this experinent, although cost per glalr ofcrude protein froE trater hyacinth ferDentation lras higher than
0Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
R
^卜 ′
77
that of soybean DeaI and the protein quality lras also inferiorto soybean in case of aoino acid conposition, fEraented rrate!
hyacinth production stiIl has soue interesting eleuents as
fo I lows;
5.1.6.1 l{ater hyacinth can be easily eollected
frou the irater resources and the farners will not have any
expenditure in plantation. l{oreover, using nater hyaeinth forferuentation for feeding anirals can selve as ona Dethod thatgive an advantage in elinination of nater hyacinth (which is a
troublesone reed uaking the rivers sha1lon, obstructinE
navigation and uaking nany environnental problens) froa itate!
resources. Furtheraore, using this uethod lrill not only provide
a benefit in ease of reducing federal cost of aliuination of
rater hyacinth but also provide an altarnative econonical aniual
feed source.
5.1.8.2 In cases of runinant aninal feedinE, th6
fibrous conposition is essential in ration. This is because
ruainant aninals can use fibers as sourccs of energy by thc
activity of uieroorganisus that ara ;rrgsent in their rurEn.
?herefore, using of fernented water hyacinth fecd runinan!
aniuals will have an adventage over using only soybcan ueal
because p€rcent f iber content in water hyacinth is higher than
that of soybean neal . Feeding runinant aninals only soybean
neal Day result in death of the aniuals by a syiptoo called
"bout",
5. 1.6. 3 Although price per grau of crude protein
of soybean ueal is Iorcer than feruented rrater hyacinth, the
process used for feeding aninals is nore eonplex. Before usinEi
へご
Copyright by Mahidol University
●
+l,
?2
soybean as a feed, it has to be Dixcd with other rall Daterials o!substrates in a strict foruula. Ifh:Ie faruented water hyacinth
needs to be nixed with onLy forage o! loulthage such as glass,
dry-grass or rice strarr.
5.1.8-4 The lacking of soybean ueaL is one probleu
in livestock production. fn order to solve this problea, raterhyacinth can be harvested, fernented and used as a feed forruninant aniuals. If farners do this process the[selvrs or
using their own labour, the cost of fernented wate! hyacinthproduction wiIl decrease to 3.04-4-04 and 3.45-4.45 baht,/ktl fo!10 and 15 days fernentation and the cost per Erau of crude
protein will ba about 0.028-0.038 and 0.030-0.03S baht,
respect ive ly .
5.1.7 Cost pcr kg of fcruented nater hyacinth rithfilo"entous fungi, rice straw with urea 6Z and pater hyacinth
rith urea 5Z nere conpared by calculation basEd on usinE: rat,'uaterial (dry weiEht) = tZO l+El, fauers used their orn labour
(labour cost rras excludad in ealculation), feruented 15 days (see
Appendix B). ?he couparison Eas as follows;
らヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
^
73
Type CoSt/kg(baht)
CoSt/g(baht)
ZProtein increased
Ilater hyacinth+fungus
Rice straw+urea 62
If ater hyacinth+urea 5Z
0.030-0.039
0.062(0.033)
0.0■ 8
17.13-18.16*
78.33**
50.00***
3.45-4.45
4.26(2.26)
2.38
^一
x Data fron Table 4.5x:l llongsesrikear and llanapat ( 3? ) .
tx* I{anapat and llongsewon (29).
Cost per kg of fernented rice stlar rlith urea 6U rvas
quite high <4.26 baht,/kE) in case where faraers do not have
enough rice straw and have to buy (rice straw plice = 2 baht/kg).If farners have enough rice straw fo! f6rDentation, cost per kg
riLl decrease to 2.26 baht/I€. Then considered cost per kg offernented rater hyacinth with urea 52 it ras found that the cost
was lorer than cost pe! kg of feraentcd water hyacinth rithfunEus and 7 protein increasEd also higher. tharefore,production of feruented water hyacinth Eith urea 5Z and fc![entedrice stran Eith urea 6Z for feedinE aninals to Einilrize the
problea of lacking of food and relieve theirbody reight loss in
suBaer season seen to be suitable and econouical . Horever,
feruentation of pater hyacinth with fungus can also be applied
where the conditions aI lolr .
5.1.8 In this experiaent, the liuitation of feruented
rater hyacinth rith filanentous fungi production can be described
as fo I lows;
●
ヘCopyright by Mahidol University
1
74
5.1.8.1 The stage of preparing Eater hyacinth(staEfe of elinination of other aicroorganisns by heat or steaa)before feruentation ras conprex and this process aade cost ofproduction up or higher. Using Dethod. of feraented wate!hyacinth nith only urea seens to be sinple and optiuized.
5.1.8.2 During ferEentation, controlling of the
optinuE condition for fungus grorth such as pH, Boisture andO teulreratule tras difficult.
5.2 Conalnsi on
In the study on iDproveaent in the feed value of waterhyacinth by feruentation with filaaentous fungi, the results can
be concluded as follows:
5.2.L flater hyacinth before fernentation contained
crude protein, crude fiber, NDS, NDF, ADF and heaicelluloseapproxinately S.892, 2L.572, 3T.LBZ, 62.AZZ, 2?-4?t and 35.3BZ,
a!respectively but contained ether axtract and lignin only 3.AgZ
and 2.852.
5 -2.2 ThE pH condition dulinE f euentation exhibited a
decreasing trend fron the first day until the end offeruentation. Tha range of pH durin€, feruentation ras 3.g5-6.SS.
5.2.3 The tenperature in the pile duri.ng feraentationvaried depending upon aEbient teDperature. The ranE e ofteEperature during ferEentation was 30. O-37.0 C.
+a5.2.4 The protein content in water hyacinth afterCopyright by Mahidol University
0
75
ferrentation sras increased when coupared with lrater hyacinth
before ferlentation. the nagnitude of increase in protein
content etas O.2l-21.782.
5.2.5 The study on the effect of inoculua size and
length of erater hyacinth used in feruentation on protein content
showed highly siElnif icant interaction (P<0.01) betreen the 2
factors for 10 days Hater hyacinth ferlentation. Ilhile 15 days
feruentation shoned significance of treatnent B only (P<0.05),
rhich indicated that the length of water hyacinth affected
protein content of feruented water hyacinth whereas inoculun
g j.z6 of fx;us showed no o:f ects.
5.2.6 Protein content arL.; 10 days faruentation fron
using rrat6! hyacinth at L/4 of norual length eras higher than
using Bater hyacinth at norual length nhen feraented with
i,i3euluo size of funEus 5Z ..d 1CU (P<0.05). Prot,ein content
when coopared with rrater hyacinth before feraentation tras
increased by 14. O47 and 9.362, resPactively.
5.2.7 Protain content aftgr 15 days fernentation froa
usinEl water hyacinth at noraal length i.as hirlher than usinEi water
hyacinth at l/4 of norual length lrhen fernented with inoculuu
size of fungus 52 and 102 (P<0.05). Protein contont erhen
coopared Hith Hater hyacinth before feruentation was i.ncreased by
L7.l3Z and 18.16I, r espec t ive Iy .
5.2.8 The chenical composition of the optiaua saoples
are shown as fo lloring:
●
ハイ
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
●
76
5.2.8.1 Ash and ether extract in a1I oPtiEuD
sanples shored an increasing trend (P<0.05), while ADF and ADL
were not si.gnif icantly different (P>0.05) when compared trith
water hyacinth before fernentation.
5.2.A.2 CE, NDF, NDS and heuiceLlulose of silage
when fernented 10 and 15 days showed little change. Moreover,
the change of these nut!ient cooponents was inconsistent.
5.2.s Pattern of anino acids in water hyacinth after
feruentation shored that the anino acid eouPosition of nater
hyacinth oet the FAO reference requirenent excePt for sulPhur-
containinE auino acids such as uethionine and cystine, and
tryptophan.
5.2.10 Cost per glan of crude ptotein of ferlented
water hyaeinth production in this study was about 0.168, 0.184,
O.zgl and 0.208 baht for treatuents A081,A181, A0B0 and A180,
respectively when fernented for 10 and 15 deys. If farlers do
this feruentation process theaselves or using their orn labour,
cost per !3!aD of crude protein of fernented irater hyacinth
production will decrease to 0.028 , 0.038, 0.030 and 0.039 baht
for treatuents A081, A1B1; A0B0 and A1B0, resPectively.
In application, this discussion and conclusion Plov1de
iBportant inforuation of the uethods, process of ferDentation and
cost of production for f g.rners to produce good quality silage in
the future.
●
`
Copyright by Mahidol University
ri
77
5.3 Recolrandation
The experinent described in the previous paEles nas only
the first step in studyinEl the iaproveuent in the feed value of
water hyacinth (Eichhornia *t rit: |lart. ) by f ernentation with
filanentous fungi (Pleurotus osf.reatls.). Resul.ts frou this
experiaent rrere sti11 not couPlete because of it covered only
,rater hyacinth (Eichhornia cressipas, .llart. ) and filanentous
fungi (P l eurotus ostreatus).
Additinal inforuation is essential in order to develop a
proper processind nethod for large scale of rater hyacinth
fernentation production and as a potential ueans for iuProvinE
nutritive value of other residues. Further investiElations neaded
at8:
5.3.1 0ther uethods of preparinE water hyacinth before
feruentation which is not couplex and is nore econouized.
5.3.2 Feeding trials rith runinant aninals should ba
arranEied for studying feed intake, diSestibility, E:rorth rate per
day and feed conversion efficiency.
5.3.3 Other residues and various filaoentous fungi used
for felDentation.
5.3.4 InforEation of additive chetricals or reagents
used for feruenlation in cases of both type and quantity.
5.3.5 To design an appropriate
ferDenting house, steau cooker and furnace for
and econouized
ferDented HaterAヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
(・
7A
i{ater hyacinth harvest can behyaeinth lrloduct ion
easily done.
in areas where
《ご
1
へ‘
Copyright by Mahidol University
79
●
BIBLIOGRAPHY
(1) Chahal DS. Bioconversion of Lignocellulose into food and
feed rich in Protein. In: Advances in Agricultural
llicrobiology. Edited bv Subba Rao. 1st ed. New delhi:
Butterworth & Co (Publishers) Ltd, 1982: 704p'
(2) l{oo-YounEi !1, chahal DS, Sran JE, Robinson Cll' SCP Production
by Chaetoniun ceIlulolvticun, a ne!' theruotolerant
fungus. Biotechnol & Bioeng t977; 20" 107-118'
(4) Nesuark P. Fungus food. Nature 1980; 28?: 6'
(3) Peitersen N, Robinson CI{,
of cellulase and
Trichoderna viride.374.
(5) tleevootison V, Flegel TlI, Glinsukon
Screeningi for an isolation of
froa Thailand for aniual feed
Thailand 1984; 10: L47-l?8-
(?) Devendra C. The
as an inalAustralia.
1S82.
Hillton J, I{oo-Youn8 l{. Production
protein frou ba!IeY straw bY
Biotechnol & Bioeng 1975; t7:. 361-
T, Sobbon N, KiatpaPan S.
lignocellulolytic fungi
production. J Sci Soc(ヽ
(8) Sloneker JH. Agricultural residues, including feedlot Faste'
Biotechnol & Bioeng Svop 1976; 6: 235-250'
utilization of fibrous agricultural residues
feeds. Edited bv DovIe PT. ParkviIle'
UniversiEy of llelbourne Printi'ng Services,
‘ヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
(・
0
ハ
80
(8) Flegel TT, Ilanidool C, Meevootison V. IoProvenents in the
feed value of rice stlalr by fernentation with filanentous
fungi. Depart. Microbiology, Fac. Sci., I{ahidol
University, Raua VI Road and Livestock Production
Depaltnent, Hinistry of Agliculture, Phaya Thai Road,
Bangkok, Thailand, 1985.
(S) Chahal DS, Hawksnorth DL. cellulolvtieun, a nee,
thernotolerant and ceIlulolytic Chaetouiun I. Isolation,
description and Eronth rate. Myeologia 1976; 68: 600-610-
(10) Chahal DS, Wang DIC. Chaetomiun r・ 。111・ ln17● 1● 11■ , grOWth
behav■ or on oellulose and prote■ n production. llyco logia
1978; 70: 160-170.
( 11) PhiIIips DH . 0xygen transfsr into lvcelial Pe1lets.
Biotechnol & BioenE 1966; 8: 456-460.
(12) GregOry KF, Reade AE, Khor GL, Alexander JC, Lunsden JH,
of carbohydratos to Protein bv hi€h
Food Technology 1976; March: 30-35.
(13) Reade Δ口, GregOry KF. High temperature protein― enriched
feed fron cassava by fungi. Applied Microbiology 1975;
30: 897-907.
Losos G. Conversion
tenperature fungi.
( 14) Lee YY, Lin
hydro Iys isBiotechnol &
CM, 」ohnson T, Cha口 bers RP.
of hard口 ood hemicellulose
Bioeng sy● p 1978; 8: 75-38.
Se 1ec t ive
by ac ids .
●ヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
6・
81
(15) Hoo-Young l{, Chahal DS, Vlach D. Sing1e-cel1 protein froa
various cheuically pretreated wood substrates using
Chaetoiniun ce11ulolvticun. Biotechnol & Bioeng 1978; 20:
107- 118 .
( 16) Ilanapat M . Ruuinant Nutrition. Depart. Aniu. Sci. , Fac.
Alrriculture, Khonkaen University, Khonkaen, 1988: 387p.
(17) Roger DJ, Colenan E, SPino DF, Purcell TC. Production of
fungus-protein frou cellulose and Hasta eellulosics.
Environnental Science Technology 1972; 6: ?15-719.
(18) Vijchulata P, Sanpote S. The utilization of fibrous
aElricultural residues as aninal feeds. Edited by .
Doylg
PT. Parkville. Australia. University of llelbourne
Printing Services, 19E2.
(19) Ericksson EE, Larsson f,. Feruentation of waste aechanical
fibers frou a newsPrint uil1 by the rot fungus
f+ Soorotichuu pulverulentun. Biotechnol & BioenEl 1975; 17:
327-348.
(20) Updergraff Dl{. Utilization of cell.ulose frou raste PaPer by
Hwrotheciun verucaria. Biotectinol & Bioeng L97lr; 13: 7?-
79.
<2L) Crarford DL, McCoy E, Harkin Jll , Lones P.
u j,c rob ial proteln fTheraoaonosoora fusca, a
Bioteehnol & Bioeng 1973;
roE laaste
therrophi l ic15: 833-843.
Ploduction of
cel lu l.ose by
actinoEycEte.
らヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
0ヽ
82
(22) Daugulis AL, Bone DH. Production of uicrobial protein frou
tree bark by Phanerochate chrvsosporiun- Biotechnol &
BioenEt 1978; 20: 1639-1649.
<23) NobIe G. OPtitsization of steaE exPlosion
Final repof,t, Subuitied to U.S. Dept- 'of
frou Bionass Ploglan, Iotech CorPoration
Ontario, Canada, 1980.
pretreat[ent.
Energy, FueIs
Ltd. Ottawa,
0
う
<24) Hesseltine C'I . Solid-state feruentation. Biotechnol &
BioenEl L9?2; t4: 51?-532.
(2s) Siluan Rtl . Enzyne foraation during solid substlete
feruentalion in rotation vessels. Biotechnol & Bioeng
L96O; 22: 4tl-420.
(26) Detroy DT, Linderfelser LA, Lulian Jr G ST' 0rton I{L'
Sacchar if icat ion of nheat strar eellulose by enzyuatic
hydrolysis folloning ferDentative and cheaical
pretreatnent. Biotechnol & Bioeng Svup 1980; 10: 135-148.
(2?) PaDDent N, Robinson C'C, Hillton J, l{oo-Young I{. Solid-state
cultivation of Chaetoaiuu cellulot:rtieuu on alkali-
pretreated sas-dust. Biotechnol & Bioeng 1978; 20: 1735-
L744.
( 28 ) Han Y'J, Cheeke PR, Anderson 'd , LekPravoon C . Grosth
Aurobasidiuu pull.ulans on st,raw hydrolysate. Applied
Environuental l'licrobiologv 1976; 32:. 799'802.
f
d
O
na
0Copyright by Mahidol University
8ヽ
θ
(31) Rattanavanieh A, Phouoa S, Chanurai T, Tui'kunPee 'S,
PetauEson C. Feruentation irater hyacinth experinent as a
feed for beef in suts[er season. J Soon Bangphra 1881; 1E
(5):35.
(32) AOAC. Official llethods of Analysis. Association of
Official Analytical Chenists. 11th ed. llashington DC,
1980:1141p.
(33) Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. Eorage fiber analy="" (epp"".t,rs,
reagents, procedures and soEe apPlications). ARS' USDA
Handbook No. 379. 1970.
(34) Khacharoen Y, Khacharoen S. Applied Aninal Nutrition.4
Depart. Aninal Science, Eac. AEricultule, Ehonkaen
UniversitY, Khonkaen, 1983: 90.
(35) P iyasun trarongse J. Soybean. Agricultural Econonic News
1990;36(409):22-23.
(36) I{anapat l{. Processing and Preservation of an imal
Agr icu Iture,feedstuffs. Depart - Aninal Science, Fac.
Khonkaen University, f,honkaen, 1985: 1-31.
i{ongsesrikeas 'rl , l{anaPat ll . Results of using
fernented nith urea affected on neiglht,
( 23 ) '*anapat l{, I{ongsewon C. Trendency
as cattle feed. Kaenkaset 1984;
(30) Reza A, Khan ilR. I{ater hyacinth as
Aniaal Sci 1981; 51: 7O2.
83
of usinEl water hyac inth
LZ <3): 116-123.
cattle feed. Indian J
rice strag
d igest ib Ie【ヽ
<37 )
Copyright by Mahidol University
(
ヽ
84
coefficient and hematology of buffalo. Kaenkaset 1983;
11 (5): 233-239.
,
(
・
いヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
(ご
A-1
▲PPENDIX A
Data o■ the ■Ynerinen■
Table A.1 Data on cheuical colrposition of water hyacinth before
ferDentation (Z drv aatte! )
Nutrient Rep l Rep 2 ll ean
倉
^
l{o istureAsh
Crude protein
Ether extract
Crude fiberNEE
AD!'
NDF
NDS
ADL
Henicellulose
4.64
18.75
9.58
2.42
21.56
43.05
28.32
62.64
37.36
2.77
39.66
4.98
17.80
9.80
2.35
21.58
43.49
26.61
63.00
37.00
2.98
31.05
4.80
■8.28
9.69
2.39
21.57
43.27
27.47
62.82
37.18
2.85
35.36
ハCopyright by Mahidol University
ハ
A-2
Tab1e A.2 Data of pH during 25 days feroentation
Rep 1 Rep 2DayAOB0 AOBl A130 A131 AOB0 A031 ■130 AlBl
nヽ
1
2
3
4
5
R
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
6.80
6.50
6.20
6.00
5.60
5.50
5.50
5.50
5.30
5.10
5.10
5.10
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.80
4.80
4.70
4.50
4.50
4.30
4.00
S.80
6.50
6.50
6.20
5.80
5.30
5.60
5.60
5.40
5.40
5.40
5.30
5.30
5.20
5.10
5.00
4.90
5.20
4.80
4.80
4.70
4.70
6.70 6.80
6.70 6.50
6.30 6.20
6。 30 6.20
5.90 6.10
5.70 6.00
5.60 6.00
5.60 5.90
5.60 5.90
5.50 6.20
5.50 6.20
5.40 6.00
5.40 6.00
5.20 5.40
4.90 5.00
4.90 4.80
4.80 4.70
4.80 4.70
4.80 4.70
4.70 4.50
4.50 4.30
4.50 4.30
7.00 7.10
6.90 6.80
6.30 6.60
6.00 6.30
5,70 6.20
5,70 6.00
5.50 6.00
5.50 5.80
5.50 5.60
5.50 5.60
5.50 5.60
5.50 5.60
5.40 5.60
5.00 5.20
4.60 4.90
4.40 4.80
4.50 4.80
4.40 4.60
4.30 4.70
4.40 4.80
4.40 4.60
4.40 4.80
6.80 6.80
6.70 6.70
6.30 0.50
6.00 6.30
5.20 5.70
5.20 5.70
5.20 5.60
5.20 5.60
5.20 5.20
5.40 4.80
5.40 4.30
5.40 4.80
5.40 4.80
5.00 4.60
4_80 4.60
4.70 4.60
4.60 4.40
4.60 4.50
4.50 4.50
4.40 4.80
4.40 4.70
4.40 4.80
^
うCopyright by Mahidol University
0
ヽ
Table A.2 (continued)
A-3
Rep l Rep 2Day
25
A031 AlBO AlBl AOB0 ▲031 AlBO ▲lBl
0
3
4
2
2
3.80 4.50 4.20 4.60
3.50 4.50 4.20 4.50
3.50 4.30 4.00 4.50
4.20
4.20
4.00
4.60
4.40
4.40
4.30 4.90
4.30 5.00
4.20 5.20
I{ean
Range
5.00 5.30 5.40 5.30
3.50-6.80 4.00-6.80
4.30-6.70 4.50-6.80
5.20 5.40
4.00-7.00
4.40-7.10
5.10 5.20
4.20-6.80
5.00-6.80
^
0Copyright by Mahidol University
●
ヽ
A-4
Table A.3 Data of anbient toDperature between feruentation
Day ( ll in inun-uaxiuun ) aubient terperature( C) Mean
,
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
1
1
25.9-32.0
26.0-32.0
24.0-31.0
24.5-33.0
26.0-34.0
26.0-34.5
25.0-34.0
24.0-33.0
25.0-34.0
27.0-34.0
26.0-33.0
27.0-34.0
26.0-34.0
26.0-35.0
26.0-35.0
26.0-35.0
25.5-34.5
25.5-34.5
26.8-35.0
25.5-35.0
25.1-34.0
25.0-35.5
25.0-33.0
29.0
29。 0
27.5
23.8
30_0
30.3
29.5
28.5
29.5
30.5
29.5
30.5
30.0
30.5
30.5
30.5
30.0
30.0
30.9
80.3
29.6
30.3
29.0
^
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
0Copyright by Mahidol University
A-5(了
Table A.3 くcontinued〉
Day ( l{ in iauo-uaxiauu ) anbient tenperature( C) l{ean
llean 25.5-33.7 29.6
24 25.0-32.0 28.5
25 24.0-31.0 27.5
ハ
ヘ
●ヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
(r
A-6
treatDentTable A.4 Data of
be trreen
nininun-uaxiEuu te[peEatu!e
feroentat ion
of 4
Day ll in iuuu-uaxiuun tenperature ( C)
Rep 1
A030 A031 AlB0 A131
^̀
ヘ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
27.0-33.0
27.0-33.5
26.0-32.0
23.0-34.0
29.0-35.0
30.3-35.5
30.0-35.0
30.0-35.2
30.0-35.6
31.0-35.6
31.0-37.0
31.5-38.0
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.0
31.2-38.0
31.0-38.1
31.7-38.2
31.5-38_0
32.0-38.2
31.8-38.1
27.5-33.0
27.0-33.6
26.2-32.0
28.5-34.2
29.5-36.8
30.5-35.5
30.5-35.0
30.7-35.0
30.5-35.8
30.6-35.6
31.0-36.0
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.0
31.5-38.2
31.6-38.3
31.6-38.4
31.5-38.3
3■ .3-38.5
31.5-38.4
27.5-33.0
27.0-33.5
26.5-32.6
29.3-34.0
29.5-36.6
30.5-36.2
31.0-36.0
31.0-33.0
31.0-36.0
31.0-37.0
31.0-37.0
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.2
31.2-38.3
31.2-38.3
31.2-38.2
31.2-38.0
31.5-38.2
31.2-38.1
27.0-33.0
26.5-33.5
26.5-32.0
29.0-34.6
30.0-36.3
31.1-37.0
31.0-37.2
31.0-37.0
31.0-36.0
31.0-36.0
31.0-36.0
31.0-37.5
31.0-37.5
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.1
31.0-38.4
31.0-38.3
31.0-38.2
31.2-38.4
31.0-38.2
らヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
(ぎ
Table A.4 くoontinued)
A-7
Day !'l in inun-uaxiaun teuperature ( C )
Rep 1
A030 AOBl AlB0 AlBl
^
21
22
23
24
25
31.8-38.2
31.5-38.3
31.5-38.4
31.5-38.5
31.5-38.2
31.6-38.2
31.4-38.4
31.5-38.4
31.5-38.5
31.4-38.3
31.1-38.2
31.0-38.1
31.2-38.4
31.3-38.2
31.3-38.2
31.1-38.9
31.0-38.7
31.0-38.5
31.1-38.6
31.2-38.5
llean 30.4-36.6 30.5-36.7 29.2-36.9 30.4-37.0
´
(t・・
Table A.4(continued)
Day Mininun― naxinun tenperature ( C)
Rep 2
A131▲130AOBlAOB0D
D
〕
1
2
3
4
5
6
27.0-33.0
26.6-33.5
26.0-32.0
28.5-34.0
30.0-36.0
30.0-36.0
27.4-33.2
27.0-33.5
26.0-32.6
29.5-34.0
29.6-36.0
29.0-36.0
26.8-33.0
27.0-33.5
26.0-32.2
29.0-34.0
29.5-36.2
29.5-36.2
27.5-33.0
27.0-33.5
26.0-32.8
28.5-34 0
29.5-36.0
29 5-36.2D
●
p●
Copyright by Mahidol University
0
一
Table A.4 (continued)
A-8
Day ll in inun-aaxinun tenperature ( C)
Rep 2
A030 A031 AlB0 AlBl
●し
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
31.0-36.2
31.0-36.0
31.0-36.0
31.0-36.0
31.0-36.0
31.0-36.5
31.0-38.0
31.2-37.2
31.3-37.5
31.2-37.8
31.1-37.8
31.0-37.5
31.3-37.8
31.1-37.6
31.2-37.5
31.1-37.6
31.2-37.6
3■ .2-37 5
31.1-37 5
30.3-36.0
30.0-36.0
31.0-36.0
31.0-36.0
31.0-37.5
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.0
31.3-38.2
31.5-38.3
31.5-38.5
31.6-38。 3
31.6-38.3
31.7-38.4
31.5-38.2
31.5-38.3
31.5-38.3
31.5-38.5
31.3-38.6
31.6-38.5
30.3-36.0
30.0-36.0
30.0-36.0
30.0-36.0
31.0二 36.0
31.0-36.5
31.0-36.8
31.0-37.0
31.1-37.2
31.3-37.3
31.2-37.3
31.2-37.3
31.3-37.3
31.1-37.1
31.3-37.2
31.3-37.4
31.3-38.0
31.3-38.0
31.2-38.0
30.0-36.6
30.0-36.3
30.0-36.8
31.0-37.0
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.0
31.0-38.0
31.2-38.1
31.5-38.2
31.5-38.3
31.2-38.2
31.3-38.4
31.1-38.2
31.2-38.3
31.4-38.4
31.5-38.5
31.6-38.5
31.6-38.5
へご
Hean 30.4-36.4 30.5-35.5 30.2-36.3 30.3-37.0
RCopyright by Mahidol University
うこ
A-9
●
nATa 鯉 2mαェニニュ CQ遭=Ξ
遭■
―prote■n content of water hyao■ nth before fermentation
rep Z protein
9.58
9.80
nean 9.69
-Protein content in !.ater hyacinth S days fErlentation
treatD6nt rep
― r― ― ― ― ― ― ― ― ― ― ― ―
χ protein
AOB0
ら
AOBl
A130
A131
10.00
10.30
10.20
11.40
10.30
10.50
10.40
10.60
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
0
1
2
Copyright by Mahidol University
〔・一
A-10
●
-Protein eontent in watar hyacinth 10 days feraentation
treatEen t rep Z protein
A030 9.80
9.61
11.00
11.10
10.60
10.40
10.70
10.50
AOBl
A130
A131
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
―Protein content in water hyac■ nth 15 days fernentation
tr eatnen t rep χ prote■n
^
AOB0
A031
AlB0
11.20
11.50
10.60
10.10
11.40
11.50
10.30
10.40
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
0
AlBl
Copyright by Mahidol University
〔〓 A-11
-Protein content in water hyacinth 20 days feruentation
treatEen t rep Z p:otein
A030
●
AOB l
A130
AlBl
11.50
12.10
11.30
10.40
11.40
10.80
10_90
10.40
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
-Protein content in Fater hyacinth 25 days fernentation
t reatuen t rep Z protein
AOB0^
AOBl
AlB0
A131
10.20
10.10
10.70
9.69
10.90
10.60
10.30
10.80
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
●Copyright by Mahidol University
●
・ A-12
fIIjlN.lE : ?roTf"E : :csearch of :r?ter hlpci.nth
屁躙DttEaD CFL=E3EXK D園 工Q:
…
Har(r)= 2
軍u】ぜШ =機 amt (t) = 21t l =,1t2=刊 2t3 =v3
A t 4 =74tr t5 =v5t6 =“t7=v7t 8 =78t9="t10 = v10
tll 言711
t12 =▼12t13 =・l13
t14 =▼14
t15 =715t16 =716t17 =▼17t18 =v18t19 = ▼19t20 = v20
t21 =va
ヘ
tit2t3t4t5t6t7t3”tlO一一・13出・““t・7t・3t・9
RTl
9.58
10.00
10.20
10.30
10_40
9.30
11.00
10.6010.7011.10
10.601■ .」Э
10.30
11.50
11.3011.4010.9010.20
10.70
P,ote■n (1)
腰 2
9.80
10.30
11.40
10.50
10.60
9.61
ユ .10
10.■ 0
10.50■1.50
10.10
11.50
10.40
12.10
10.40
10.3010.40
10.109.69
0
10E...
Copyright by Mahidol University
ら
A-13
20
■
t
t
10.90 10.60
10。 30 10。 30
223.73 222.50
10.66 10.60
Nwsls CF Ⅷ 躙 田 麒 μvt由 は)
囮 螂
田 螂
SSSrW
^ …
霊圏N(r)椰EEttNr(T)m
.
20
”
0.0
11.2
2.7
0.0
0.6
0.1
く1
4.17摯
螂 41 13.9
c▼ = 3.5t精 =Stt■ C・・ t at lな level
1XBLE OF BBnlEr llEeNs rcR Brotein (t)(AVE. 0F 2 n@S)
鰹 酬 螂 瑯
ヘ
1
3
2
6
7
2
・4
7
9
・6
5
・7
9
・8
・3
・5
・0
3
4
・1
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ю
■
12
3
■
15
・6
ヨ
・3
・9
∞
■
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
9。69 a
10.15 ab
10.80 b― f
10.40aく10.50a→9。70 a
ll.05 c― g
10.50 a¨ e
10.60 b‐ f
ll.35 efg
10.35 a―dll。 45 fg
10.60卜 f
ll.30 g
10.85 b‐ f
■.10d●10.65 卜 f
10.15 ab
10.19 abc
10.75 brf
10.55 a― e
10.63
In a cctum, reans folloned bt' a c(tren letier ara
not siqificani:ly iliiferent at the 5t Ie!€I Yl'DI,,RT'
ヘ
Copyright by Mahidol University
〔
・ A-14
口Lコ職E:赳 :
瑯 : prCte.。 し。`ltent
瓢 国 :ハ 10剛 側 ユば 国 α
鳳劇コomol(r)= 2
鰹 ■即 =2x2
illodtm(i)= 2■l=a0
ハ 鯰 =al
lauぬ (1)= 2■ =b012 =bl
ユ
2
11
2
ユ
i2
が 倫)
Rr71 田 2
10.00 10.3010。 20 11.40
10.30 10.5010.40 10.60
40。 90 42_80田 MLS腰 螂 10.23 10.70
ヽ
鵬肛 るIS CF tARIAIm工 R y5(1)
SV DF SS Ms F
¨ ュ=r]α
‖ (r) 1 0.4513
鰹 T口r(T)mm (1)lenrh (1)量
ERRCR
0.4513 3.33ns
O.1446 1.23ns
O.0013 o.01ns
O.2313 2.3'ns
O.1512 1.23nsO.1179
3 0148381 0.0013
1 0.1813
1 0。 15r3 0.3537
螂
ヘ
cr7= 3.3■
7 1.2387
Copyright by Mahidol University
0
ヽ A-15
m配 :忠螂 : prOte.n ccnt・nt
ら
… …
BIg ttICI
RmaTIQ (r)= 2
熙 Ⅲ口r = 2 x 2
mm (1)= 2ユ =Ю
12 =al
lぃ (1)=2 :u=Ю
12 =bl
11
2
■
2
・1
・2
口 0 (1)
口 1 ■'p2
9.80 9.61
11.00 11.10
10.60 10.4010.70 10.50
鵬P- 42.10 41.61田 囮 郎 10.52 10.40
ANALYSIS OF… FOR prO10 (■ )
へ´
SV DF SS
蘭 C濯園 (r) 1 0.0300MEII:{ErI (T)
inoculu (i)length 0)ieI
:!DO'D
0.0300 2.73nsO.6262 56.93★ナ
0。 C595 5.41ns
l.0440 4.00rts
O。 7750 70.16彙=0.Cl10
3 1.3785
1 0.0595
1 1.0如1 0.7750
3 0.0330
螂
α′= 1.銚
7 1.9416
^ .
∬
Copyright by Mahidol University
●
・
A-16
iК l■証LE CF l圏お KR pro10 くヽ)
(NE.颯 2騒PS)
lettth(1) aO a1 1→ {田N DIFF
bo 9。 70 10.50 10.10 0.79
bl ll`05 10.60 10。33 0.45
i{,rEtil 10.38 10.55 10.45 -0.17
ハ
ヘ
ら,
Copyright by Mahidol University
()
A-17
lE;ltritE : :d(gf.E : .orclein ccntent
職 園 ED口 則 頭 BIM DESIα
…
EaI(r)= 2
-r=2x2T― um(1)= 2
■1 3a0Aご 鯰 =al
leprh (1) = 2ユ =b012 =bl
ぼ 岬
RP螂
pro15(1)
Rr2
11.50
10.10
1■ .50
10.40
43.50
10_88
■
2
■
2
ユ
i2
Rpl
ll.2010。 60
1■ .40
10.80
44。 (XD
■■∞へ
AlllLY$S OE vlRnIE EDR tro15 (t)
SSW"
i4S
距H]富=圏
籠 (r}
田 ]□r(T)興 lm(i)
lensh(1)量
螂
1
1
1
1
3
3
0.0312
1.7837
0.0613
1.7113
0.01120.2233
0.0312
0.5946
0.0613
1.7113
0.Ol12
0.07“
0。 42ns
7.97ns
O.32ns
22.94士
o.■5ns
oァ = 2.5■
2.0387
らCopyright by Mahidol University
(一
A-18
ixl■ uIE CF題コilS КR pro15 (■ )
(■VE. CVER 2 REPS)
1麹翼ユ (ll Ю al l→ 酬 DEF
b0 11.35 11.45 11.10 -0.10
b1 10.35 10。 60 10.48 -0.25
i抑 10.85 11.02 10.94 -0.13
nt
R
(こ
Copyright by Mahidol University
〔)
A-19
Ш niE:lょ螂 : prOte.a ccnter.t
硼 配 画 D織 駆 臨 Ш 恵 】Ы W
証劇肛α Π釧 (r)= 2
TnTErr = 2 x 2
mm (1)= 2■l =a0
ハ・ i2 =al
la∝膚b (1) = 2■ =b012 =bl
脚 20 (1)
皿 田 2
11.50 12.1011.30 10.40
3
i211 ■ .40 10。 8012 10。 90 10.40
田 螂 45.10 43.70
REP tt ll.27 10。 92
皿 YSIS CF m簡 燎 pr。20 (ゝ )
・1
2
ユ
SV DF SS S
Ш α r]口田 (r) 1 0.2450熙 T口F(T)■nodtm(1)lenO (1)
量
燕 R
0.2450 1.14ns
O.5033 2.34ns
O.4050 1.33ns
O.9800 4.56nsO。 1250 o.58ns
O.2150
3 1.5100
1 0.40501 0.9800
1 0.12503 0.5450
"= 4.篤
7 2.“ ∞
へt
い
Copyright by Mahidol University
う
A-20
mmE:忠
“
:prOten∝ ntmt
〔,
謝 Ettm m鰯 臨 Ш 思 慶 ェQ:
RPEQT101(r)= 2
嘲 Dr = 2 x 2
mm (1)= 211 =a0i2 =al
lenm (1)= 2u =bo2 =bl
田 螂 42.10 41.19
`ヽ 口 邸 10・ 52 10。 30
pro25←)
回 鯉 2
1l ll 10.20 10。 10
12 10。 70 9,69
12ユ Ю 。90 10.6012 10.30 10.80
皿 UttIS OF n団旧 だぃ pr025← )
DF SS iIS
…
r]ON (r) 1 。。1035
職 ロロr(T)
―un(1)
lm (1)量
コК R
0。 1035 0_53“
0.1660 0.36ns
O.1560 2.35ns
O.0110 0.C6ns
O.0300 0.16ns
O.1938
3 0.4980
1 0.4560
1 0.0120
1 0。 03CO
3 0.5815
¨
G「 =4.■
7 1.1831
6ヾ
SV
Copyright by Mahidol University
〔ヽ
A-21
s]I;lBiE : cnenlEILA : a\perirent oi lth
1IDq{EED CC!,!PI,EE BI.O( DESIG{
RPLICilTCN tr) = ?
mEtnrEf[ = ireatEert (t) = 5
t1 = control
1 :3 :il3114 = 1130t5 = A1l1
山 証 eは Ⅲ は 0
鯉 l REP2
t1 4.64 4.98t2 4.93 4.76
t3 5.02 4.98
t4 4.82 4.91
t5 5.13 4.98
越P mIS 24.舅 塑。61
REP MEANS 4_91 4.92
^ mLYSIS OF Ⅷ肛N田 コ昧"む
範
“
(■ d可"dg)
sV 〕『 SS Б F
¨ こlr]コN (r) 1 0.0005
熙 耐口r(T)m
4 0.0905
4 0.0879
0.0005 0・ 02ns
O.0226 1・ 01ns
O.0220
WmL 9 0.1788
c7=3.眺
()
Copyright by Mahidol University
ら
お
A
A-22
螂 OF■u■Ш 園 幅 ER ttishre(■ dry燎五g)
(AVE. CF 2口 S)
熙 nttMr tt inls
In a coh@. reaDs foll,o{€al h' a ccmrcn letter alenot sigilicantly alifferent at t5e 5t let el by Xlfrt.
a
a
a
a
a
譴“∞8605
4
4
5
4
5
1
2
4
3
5
1
2
3
4
5
t
t
t
t
t
4.92
(゛
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
mttE:…TTTLE : 響 コent of "h
職 国 ED口 囲 弼 Ш 凛 囚 α
¨ 買01(r)= 2
TRElШ = treament (t) = 5tl =ccnmlt2 =A030
● t3 =皿t4 =避 0
t5 =AIBl
ash(■ dtt tVe■ g)
け 上 RP2
tl 18.75 17.80
t2 19。 36 18.53
t3 20.56 19。 38
t4 21.32 19.97
t5 22.39 21.38
RP mLS 102.38 97.06田 螂 20。 48 19.41
鵬 ∬IS∝
…
FOR ash(■ ■ ・ng)
A-23
R
sv r ss ∬
RmQTIm (r) 1 2.830 2.830 134.76士士
4.022 191.52★ ★
0.021
¨ (T)
mRCR4 16.086
4 0.083
9 18。 999
α =0.■
^ヽこ・
¨
Copyright by Mahidol University
() A-24
●
螂 。「 ¶通買ncrr:F_tiIS=、 、こh(1燎■ :le■g)
(■1■.CF l II`)
釈]側國F m厖 融 S
t l l 13.27 a
t 2 2 13.94 b
t 3 3 19。 97 c
t4 4 加 .65dt 5 5 21.89 e
19.94
ID a crch.un. neans folloll€d by a ccEEn letier aranot sigdficastly different at tle 5t level by XI{RI-
3
ごCopyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
…側E:ぬ 証
瑯 : eXperinent of t
職 田 ED Q囲 田 Ш Ж ttlα
駆HIαHaI(r)= 2
電 翻 M=treabent(t)=5tl =tu`trolt2 =AOB0t3 =20Bl
^ t4 =A100t5 =潤31
A-25
田 mmls田 mws
CP(■ Ⅲ ■こg)
REP2
9.80
11.5011.10
11.50
10.50
54.40
10.88
tl
t2
t3
t4
6
RPl
9.58
11.20
11.001■ .40
10。 70
53.88
10_78
ホ皿 浴IS OF Ⅷ 田 旧 駅 CP(■ Ⅲ 洒 g)
SV DF SS i4S
肥翻肛0匡κN(r)齋日躍Tttrr(T)m
1
4
4
0.0270
4.1114
0.0722
0.0270
1.0278
0.0180
1.50ns
57.10■■
螂 4.2106
o■ 1.■
^ヽCopyright by Mahidol University
へ
・ヽ
A-26
鶴 E CF電 皿 ME椰 工R● (1‐・fe■g)
(AVE. OF 2 REPS)
¨ 淑 頓S m6
園 10.33
In a coh@. EaDs foUofleil by a cm letter arenot significantly Aifferent at tle 5t level by'Dl'lRI.
acd
cab
6935055m
9■■・lЮ
l
4
3
5
2
1
2
3
4
5
t
t
t
t
t
●
【〓
0Copyright by Mahidol University
【■
A-27
ElfDEllE : &eo1TfrIE : a<Ferilent of 'rl
鰤 ¨ GttEE BIm mlcI
護Hコ軍口
"1(r)= 2¨ = treament (t) = 5
tl =mtrolt2 =■OB0
t3 ヨ■OBl
t4 =EB0ハ t5 =AIBl
RPl
工 {t DRY国
RP2
tl
t2
t3
t4
t5
2.42 2.35
2.36 2.74
2.96 3.042.76 2.83
3.05 2.94
13.55 13_902.71 2.78
AmLYSIS∝ Ⅷ 田 旧 麒=(■
DRY mCl
熙 螂
融 邸
ハ
SDFSV SS
RPEQTIm (r)鰹 画 {T)
RRCR
1
4
4
0.0切0.59530.0741
0.0切0.1488
0.0185
0.66ns
3.04'
螂 0.6816
o= 5。眺
0Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
^
A-28
螂 CF TRE=回 ]EANS FCR E (ヽ ERY'E]3)
(AVE. OF 2 む S)
¨ 脚
“
園 S
ID a qclum. ieaDs follorleal by a cmt letter ara
rot siErificantly different at tlte 5t 1ercI ts' Dfif.
a
由
c
掟
c
39
55
∞
∞
”
う● う一 ■● う‘ ぅ4
■よ う‘ E゛ ●J ■■
■■ う“ ■● ′嗜 菫゛
t
t
t
t
t
2.74
^ヽ′
ξCopyright by Mahidol University
【¨
A-29
iEitrDiilE : ctralIrILE : ereeri-mot of ,h
… …
BIM厖 爾
駆コ璽α HQI(r)= 2
TREl回 = 餞 mt {t) = 5tl = ― tいol
t2 = 1030
■ t3 =AOBlt4 =Aユ30
t5 =X31
CF(■ DRY IEC)
m 回
t1 21.56 21.58
t2 22.37 21.87
t3 19.38 20.05
t4 22.37 21.94
t5 23.02 22.87
田 wmls lo8.70 108.31REP MEANS 21.74 21.66
● mL浴田 OF nR― 麒 CF● W ECl
SV DF SS ∬
RmQTIm (r) l o.O15個 ロロr(T)m
4 11.781
4 0.438
0.015 o.14ns
2.945 26.77士 士
0.110
螂 9 12.234
oァ = 1.5■
ξCopyright by Mahidol University
^
^
ハ
A-30
■BE∝ 賢E闘田口r iEttIS ⅨR(F(1脳 y HttC)
(AVEo CF 2田 S)
¨ 螂 l螂
t ■ 2 2.57bt 2 3 22.12 bc
t 3 1 19.72 a
t 4 4 22.16 bct 5 5 22.94 c
21.70
Ia a colrun, reans folloled Lf' a c&Ml letta arenot signuicantly differ€nt at the 5t lerel bf I['!RT.
●Copyright by Mahidol University
A
mttE:d自 ュ
呻 : e・per..ent of i
欄 ¨
…
螺 m
鳳曰肛α HaI(r)= 2
寵 猥 即 =ma― t(t)=5tl =mtrolt2 =コOB0
t3 =AOBl7` t4 =iユ B0
t5 =IBl
耐 (l DRY ttК )
題 巨 駆 z
t■ 43.05 43.49t2 41.18 42.49t3 41.08 41.45t4 38。 13 39.95
t5 35.71 37.33
REP mIS 199。 15 204.71口 瑯 39.83 40.94
llL― OF… FOR NFE (t DRY 7EIC)
A-31
ハ
∬SV DF SS
…
(r) 1 3.091
畷E肛題Nr(T)熙 R
4 55.895
4 0:9∞
3.091 13.■ 摯
13.974 62.11'■
0.225
螂 9 59.386
c・7= 1.■
0Copyright by Mahidol University
【ヽ
A-32
TABLE CF TRE■画 luS FcR IEE (l DRY TE13)
(■VEo CF 2田 S)
釈圏園田r 駆Ⅸs EttS
t 1 5 43.27 d
t 2 4 41.33 c
t 3 3 41.26 c
t 4 2 39.04bt 5 1 36.52 ュ
^園 40.39
Ln a qtclum. eans follo{ed bi' a @ leti€r alenot siEnificattly different at tjte 5* lettel ry ffiRf.
ハ
魯Copyright by Mahidol University
A
YjIEIETE : cheolTCII,E : aYperhent of 'rtr
職 薗 [/‖ □ 蘭 熙 BIn ttα
証劇コロロOV(r)= 2
剛 胴 口 =tnttt(t)=5tl =controlt2 =AC30
●́ t3 =AOBl :t4 =IB0t5 =ABl
∬ (%騨 mol
Rm 腰 2
t1 23.32 26.61
t2 30.35 28.67
t3 29。 32 27.86
t4 27.35 28.86
t5 27.37 28.64
田 ― IS 142.71 140.64
REP螂 28.54 28.13
A-33
八
訓脳題 S∝ Ⅷ肛皿田 КR』『 (■ Dtt lJEC)
sv r ss
mα 「
【コⅣ (r) 1 0.428
鯉 ]□ぼ (T)
輛
4 4.729
4 5.457
0.428 o.31DSl.182 o.37ns
l.364
螂 9 10.614
α = 4.1お
ξCopyright by Mahidol University
^A-34
鰤 CF TREl画 HEANS FCR ADF (■ DRY lE工 C)
(■V口 . CF 2 REPS)
鰹 画 螂 螂
t l 1 27.47 a
t 2 5 29.51 a
t 3 4 28_59 a
t 4 3 28.10 a
t 5 2 28.00a
.28.33
Ia a colm. means follo{ed by a ccflEn latter arenot sieificantly clifferent at t]p 5* level fu DIRI.
a
A
おt
Copyright by Mahidol University
う´
A-35
nIiMME : &€trlITILE : 2-\Eerixeni of .rh
畷 園 :プ・:∞FEtt Ж 憲 鵬 IQ
駆璽EαH側 (r)= 2
問 ■回 = treament(t)= 5tl = 中 ltrol
t2 =XB0t3 =Ю■
t4 =ШAt5 =A131
tl
t2
t3
t4
t5
REPl
62.64
60.72
63.21
64.32
59.08
置 (%〕ぼ ■EC)
配
63.00
61.35
62.95
63.46
60.12
鯉 螂
RP i4M309.97 310.38
61.99 62.18
測ロロおIS CFヽ鳳田鳳ME ΠRl●F(■ 暉 HEC)ハ
W r SS
距HIα E圏I(r)¨ (T)
m
1
4
4
0.083
24.132
1.125
0.083
6.033
0.281
0.30ns
21.47★士
螂 25。 340
o′ = 0.繁
ハせ
6 F
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
A
A-36
^
螂 OF剛 富Dr m`Ftt N田 (お DRY tEC)
l■VE_OF2 WS)
鰹 Ш 螂 螂
t 1 3 62.32 b
t 2 2 61.04 a
t 3 4 63.08 b
t 4 5 63.39 b
t 5 1 59.60 a
62.08
ID a @I@, Ens folloned by' a m letter arerEt sigdficantly different at the 5t lerreI by DFfrf.
ハCopyright by Mahidol University
R
A-37
gE,naUE : dleslTfn E : aEeri.EenE of '"h
螂
… …
BIg m
班盟]蜜団 (r)= 2
¨ = 籟 ht (t) = 5tl =_lmlt2 =AOB0
′、 t3 =AOBlt4 =AIB0t5 =AIBl
■■
●‘
3
4
5
t
t
t
t
t
鵬 ← DRY IHIG)
鯉 l RP2
37.36 37.0039。 28 38.65
36.79 37.45
35.68 36.54
40。 92 39.88
REP UALS 190.03 189.52田 mNS 38.01 37.90
`
^皿 ヽお ∝ 1脳口鼎田 麒 鵬 (l Dtt mCl
sv r ss ∬ F
¨ (r) 1 0・ 026団 ngttr (T) 4 23.400m 4 1.3“
0.026 0.08ns
5.850 17.16士 t
O.341
螂 9 24.792
α = 1.5t
‐
Copyright by Mahidol University
A
A-38
噸 CF Tu■mrrャEttS IR llDS(1 lRY 7aC)
(AVE. CF 2 REPS)
Rttntt R触 蔭 M鳳 膊
ab
aab
・8”2■“
37383736“
3
4
2
1
5
1
2
3
4
5
t
t
t
t
t
(・ ml1 37.96
I! a colr.ur. EaDs fol1cfled [' a m latter arerDt sigrificantly itilferent at ttre sft levrel by E{Ef.
^
^
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
A-39
EE nO E: dr€o.1
T[nA : eleeriEnt oi Hh
謝 嘔 囮 mm囲 配 BIn ttα
¨ コЮ諄(r)= 2
麗 躙 即 =treamt(t)=5tl =o前lLolt2 =1030t3 =AOBlt4 =A130t5 =AユBl
^
ハ
tl
2
口
t4
t5
ADl.(お DRY uCl
uェ RP2
2.77 2.93・2.89 2.843.05 2.982.78 2.963.04 2.96
熙 WmIS 14.53 14.67口 m 2.91 2。 93
皿 翻田∝ ⅧЩ tt RЖ 瀾鮨 ●爵 mGl
sv r ss i4S
劇目I■OHEON (r) 1 0.0020 0.0020 o。 2bsO.0129 1.52ns
O.0085剛 ]□r lT)m
4 0_0517
4 0.0339
螂 9 0.0876
c7= 3.■
‐
Copyright by Mahidol University
ハ
A-4o
TABE CF¨ ぼ InS工 RI几 (%ERY W口Ю)
(■嘔.CF 2固P9
駅 軍 EDr 尉側6 口ms
In a coh@. EaDs foIIo$Ed by a ccocn letter arenot significantly alifferent at the 5t level fo'D!RT.
■■ ●4 つ0 ■■ ED
t
t
t
t
t
a
a
a
a
a
35
釘
0237
∞
●‘ ら4 ■● 3‘
,●
■と う“ E● つJ ■■
^
ハ
‐
2.92
Copyright by Mahidol University
ハ
A-41
―E:d自 己
口 E :a甲 散 nt of詭
… …
BIn鵬 謝
班Πコmma:(r)= 2
¨ =・は ht(t)=5tl =om=d
a t2 =脚・J =AOBlt4 =MB0t5 =MBl
回 輌 コ (l DRY EIC)
REPl REP2
34.32 36.3930.37 32.68
33.89 35.09
36.97 34.6031.71 31.48
口 螂 167.26 170.24口
… 33.45 34.05
鵬ユ郎 IS C nR― ER HШttr_← 剛 颯К )
tl
t2
t3
t4
t5
ら
SV DF SS ∬
RPEQTIQI (r) 1 0.888熙 躙□r{T)m
4 33.719
4 7.477
0.388 0.Ins8.430 4.51ns
l.869
螂 9 42.084
oァ = 4.11
^ 、
Copyright by Mahidol University
^
tlt2t3t4t5
A-42
軍旧ロロCF ttHD"回 IS工R IE口にコL(117■ EC)(A,コ。 CF 2 2EPS)
■u]画 R恐邸 :mls
41
3
5
2
35。 36 ab
31.52 a
34.49 ab
35。 79b31.59 a
●
33.75
In a colum, *ans follorcil &' a mcn letier arenot sigdficEntly (iffereot at the 5t leryel by IImT.
ハ
^
Copyright by Mahidol University
ら
3-1
0
APPBNDIX B
PRODuCT10N cOsT CALCULAT10N
The Paraneters of productiOn cost per kg OF ,ater
hyacュ nth fernented in this study were calculated as follows;
1. Fernenting house
: Cost of feruentinEl house x Operation durationWorking life x Nuェ ber of kg
= 10,000 x lo
5(365)x 120
= 0.457 baht/kg
Or = 10,000 x 15
5(365)x 120
= 0.685 baht/kg
2. Stean― tank
= Cost of stean― tank x operation duratiOn
Horking life x Nuuber of kgi
= 500 x l
5(365)x 120
= 0.002 baht/kg
3. Furnace
= Cost of furnace x OperatiOn duration
Working life x Nunber oF kg
= 300 x l
5(365)x 120
= 0.001 baht/kg
ハ
うヽ
Copyright by Mahidol University
へ′
B-2
^
4. Stock cultur6 or inocul,uu
-if used 52
= ?:i:e per bottle x Inoculua size used in ferrentInocuユ uコ s■2e per bottle x Nunber of kg
= 4x6,000
200 x 120
■ 1.000 baht/kg
-lF 12sed 10χ
= 4 x l,200
200 x 120
3 2.000 baht/kg
Plastic
= Size x Pr■ce per aeter x operation durationI{orking life x Nuuber of kg
= 156xSx10
民
)
or =
1/2(365)x 120
0.356 baht/kg
156 x 5 x 15
6.
1/2(365)x 120
0.534 baht/kg
Urea
= Quantity used x Price
= 23 x 7/1,000
■ 0.170 baht/kg
ヘCopyright by Mahidol University
う
^
B-3
7. NH NO4 3= Quantity used x Price
= 20 x 12/1,000
= 0.240 baht/kg
8. Labour oost
= Nunber of labour x Wage rate x Operation duration
Nunber of kg
= l x 93 x 20
120
= 15.500 baht/kg
or = l x 93 x 25
120
= 19.375 baht/kg
9. Water cost
= Water used in fermentation x Un■ t pr■ ce
Nunber oF kg
= 0.180 x 2
120
= 0.003 baht,/krl
Cost per !g1 of Riee Straw Feraented with Urea Production
The process of preparinEg rice strar fernented with urea
as reported by llongsesrikeaw and l{anapat (37), can be described
as fo I lons;
Process of preparing rice straw feroented with urea 6Z
ヘCopyright by Mahidol University
^´
B_4
by using urea 6 kg and NaCl 200 g dissolved in Hater to uake up
to a voluae of 100 I, poured throughout 100 kA rice strap,covered the pile of rice straw with plastic and ferlented 3
weeks. The crude protein increased BZ ( fron 3.E3 to 6.g32 Cp).
The paraneters of cost per kA of rice strawfernented nith urea 62 rere calculated as follow;
1. Feruenting house (Data frou ferBented waterhyacinth with fungus) = 0.685 baht,/kg.(based on 120 kg of ricestrar) and = 0.571 baht,/kg. (based on 100 kg of rice straw).
2. Transportation (Data frou feruented lraterhyacinth with fungus) = 0.810 baht,zkg.
3. Rice strar, prica = 2.000 baht,zkg.
4. Plastic (Data fror feruented rater hyacinthwith fungus) = 0.534 baht,/kg.(based on 120 kg of rice stlarr) and
= 0.445 baht,/kE.(based on 100 kg of rice straw).
5. Urea, used I kE, price = 7 baht/krg.
= 6,000 x 7 = O.42O baht,/kE.
100 x l,000
NaCl, used 2009, grica = L bah.t/zg0g.
= 200 x 1 = 0. 010 baht,/kE.
100 x 200
6.
lfater, used 100 1, cubicaeter = 2 baht
= 0.100 x 2 = 0.002 baht,/k6.
7.
100
ヘ
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
Total cost per
4.25? baht,/kg. ( based
baht,/kg. (based on r ice
Cost ger E rats
rith urea 62 = 4.26
B-5
kg of rice stlalt ferEented lrith u:ea 6Z =
on rice stlair = 100 kg) and 5.112
straw = 120 kg).
of crude protein of feruented rice strar
= 0.062 baht,/g. (if rice stras has to
68. 3
be bought )
and = 2.26 = 0.033 baht./E. (farners have enough
68.3
rice straw for fernentetion).
Cost pe! fu1 e|]f water hvacinth fernented with urea ll
The process of feraented water hyacinth as reported by
Ilanapat and l{ongsewon (2g) can be described as foLLogs;
lfater hyacinth were col}ected and dried by sunli6ht forreducing noisture (dry neight = 120 krl). Urea 6 kg was dllutedirith Fater to a volune of 100 I and poured throughout Eater
hyacinth, then covered the pile of rrate! hyacinth rith plastic,feraented 3 weeks. The crude protein increased 4.2t2 (ftoa 8.42
to 12.632 CP).
The paraaeters of cost of ratEr hyacinth fer[ented
rith urea 5Z were calculated as follogs;1. Feraenting house* = 0.685 baht,/kg.
2. Transportation* = 0.810 baht,zkg.
3. Plastic* = 0.534 baht,/kg.
x Data fron Table 4.12 (Bater hyacinth feruented with fungus).
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヘ
B-6
4. '*ater, used 100 1, cubicueter = 2 baht.
= 0.100 x 2 = 0.017 baht/kg。
LZO
5. Urea, used 6 kg, price = ? baht/k€,.
= 6,000 x 7 = 0.350 baht/kg.
120 x l,000
Total cost per kg of water hyacュ nth fernented w■ th urea 5Z =
ハ 2.382 baht/kg.
Cost per gran of clude protein of fernented raterhyacinth rith urea 52 = 2.38 = 0.018 baht/tl.
126.3
^
Copyright by Mahidol University
~
A
1.
Of
APPENDIX C
METHODS OF ANALYSIS
Iethod o二 P,。 X■mate Analys■ s
Method of Proxinate Analysis follo,ed to OfFicial Methods
Ana■ysis of the Association of Analytical Chenist (AOAC),1984.
1.l Method ュニ Analysis
1.1.1 Protein AccordinE of &ialdahl Hethod of AOAC '1984,2.05?.
Hei6h out a portion of the sauPle <O.7-2.2
Eiran) and transfer to a Kieldah1 diglestion f1ask. Add 8-10 E!a!r
potassiun sulphate and 0.5 gran coPPer sulPhate and 20 nillilitreof concentrated sulphuric acid. Hsat thg saaPla Eently in the
inclined position. Ilhen the initlal frothing has ceased, fit a
loose pear shaped stopper in the toP of the flask and heat Eore
stlongly, so that the lieuid boils at a uoderata rate' ShakE the
flask frou tiae to tiue and continue the heatingi fo! one hour
aftar the lieuid has becoue clear. CooL,wash the digest into the
distilling tube with 50 uillilitra of aoron ia free t ater and add
the large pices of punice stone to prevent. buupinE. To the
receiving flask add 50 uillilitte of 4Z boric acid solution and 6
drops of oixed indicator. Connect up the distillation aPParatus
called Kjeltec Systen 1002 Distill.ing Unit rrith the deliverv tube
dipping below the boric acid sol,ution. Hake the diluted digest
alkaline !rith 50 uillilitre of percent sodiuu hvdroxide solution-
Close the tap and the rindow of apparatus and distil the aouonia
ヘ
^
Copyright by Mahidol University
c-2
into the boric acld soLution. After about 5 Einutes, open the
windor and the tap and .:ash down the delivery tube into the
receiver. Titrate the distillate sith 0.1 N sulphulic acid, the
blank titration should not exceed 0.5 oilli1itre. Calculate the
percenta€re of nitro6en in the saaple (1n1.0.1I{ H SO = 0.001424
g.N). The crude protein figule can be calculated using factor:Hate! hyaeinth Nx6.25.
a t.1.2 }loisture Pollowed AOAC, 1984, 14.003 usin!,
electric ovens nethod. The sauple is accurately weiEihed intoweiEhing bottle of knonn ireight, then placed in the ovcn at 130 C
for t hour. The bottle is rauoved to a desiccator ti1l cool iorooE teapelatule and reighed. It is returned to the oven for a
further period and again cooled and neighed until the weight isconstant. Ca1culate the percentage of uoisture in the saaple,
the loss in weight lepresants loisture.
t1.1.3 Ash Fol}oned AOAC, 1884, 14.006.
HeiEh accurately about 2 graa sauple into porcelain cluciblewhich has been praviously ignited cooled and reighed. Ileat
slowly over sua1l. flane ti11 conplete earbonizatlon takes place,
then reaove to an electric uuffle furnace and ash at 550-600 C
for 2 hours until white ash is obtained o! to constant lreight.
The reight of the residue is the neight of ash.
L.L.4 Fat qr Ethar Extract Follred AOAC, 1984,
7.062 using Soxhlet Helhod. Weirth out the dry saDple (about 2-5
glrao) frou aoi,sture deteruination and tlansfe! to Soxlet thiubleand extlacted with ether for about 8 hours. The solvent is
ら
Copyright by Mahidol University
^
な
evaporated frou the extract on electric hot-p1ate at 1ow
tenperatule until nearly all the solvent is evaporated. If drops
of erater renain with the fat, a felr nillilitre of alcohol or
acetone uay be added to hasten evaporation. Then the extractionfLask is placed in an electrie oven at 100 C to reDove lasttraces of solvent and nater, cooled in desiccator and Heighed.
Repeat drying to constant weight. {eight of fat is obtained froathe difference betreen the weiglht of the extraction flask before
and after extraction.
. 1.1.5 Crude Fiber Followed AOAC, 1984, ?.O?O.
tleiglh out the sanple (about 2 g!a[) Hhich is free froa uoistureand fat into a beaker and digested nith boiling solution of 1.252
concentrated sulphuric acid under reflux for 30 [inutes, filterand wash. The rasidue is transferred into the lhe saue beaker or
flask and digested with boiling solution of L.252 sodiuu
hydroxide under reflux for 30 linutes and then filter and wash
again. The residue is dried in an oven and Feighed. Then it isignited in an elEctric uuffle and Feighed a€ain. The loss inweight is reported as crude fiber.
1.1.6 Nitlotren Free Extract q Carbohvdrate lhiscontent is usually found by the total difference nhich is done by
substractinE the sun of percentage of water, fat, crude fiber,protein and ash fron 100. The result obtained includes allsoluble carbohydrate (sugars) and po lysacchar ides .
( ヽ
【´
Copyright by Mahidol University
ら
c-4
2. tlethod of Fiber Analvsis
2.1 Neutral-detergen t fiber (cell saIl)The neutral-deterE ent procedure for ee11 wall
consti.tuents is a rapid uethod for analyzing the total fiber in
vegetable feedstuffs. It agpears to divide the dry natter of
feeds that is nut!it,ively available (98 percent) and soluble- constituents fron those that are incoupletely available and
depcndent on nicrobial felnentation.
?
Reagent requi.red:
1. I{eu tral-d eterlrent solution :
. Distilled sater. 1--....1
Sodiun lauryL
sulfate,UsP .. 9......30
. Disodiun ethyLene-
d i au in ete traace-
tate (ED?A),
dihydrate crystal,realrent Erade....... 8......18.61
Sodiuu borate de-
eahydrata, re-
agent Efrade -- A......6.81Disodiun hydrogen
phospate, anhydrous
reagent grade....... 9......4.582 - et hoxye t hano I
,1Copyright by Mahidol University
c-5
(ethylene glycol
nonoethyl ether ),purified grade. . . ... nl ......10
Put EDTA and Na B 0 .10H 0 together in a large24? 2
beaker, add sone of the distilled rrater, and heat untildissolved; then add to sol.ution eontaininEf sodiuu lauryl sulfateand 2-ethoxyethanol (ethylene glycoI aonoethyl ether). Put
Na HPO in beaker, add soue of th6 distilled Fater, and heat24rt until dissolved I Lhen add to solution containin6 othe!
ingrad ients .
^
R
Cheek pH to range 6.9 to 7. 1. If solution isproperly uade, pH adjustuent will raraly be requirEd.
2- Decahydronapthalene-- Reagen t grade.
3. Acetone--Use grade that is frae froa color and
leaves no residue upon evaporation.
4. Sodiun sulfite--Anhydrous, reagent lgrade.
Analvtical Procedures
1. fleigh 0.5 to 1.0 g. air-dry satple Eround topass 20 to 30 uesh (1 ua.) or equivalent into a beaker of the
refluxinE appalatus.
2. Add in order, 100 nI. cold (rooa ts[perature)neutral-detergent solution, 2 nI . decahydronapthalene, and O.S g.
sodiuu sulfite with a calibrated scoop. Heat to boiling 1 to 10
oinutes. Reduce heat as boiling begins to avoid foaning. Adjustboiling to an even level and reflux for 60 uinutes, tined froaonset of bo i I ing.
3.. Place previously tared Gooch crucibles on
Copyright by Mahidol University
一(
C-6
【′
filter uanifold. Srirl beaker to suspend solids and fj.11
crucible. Do not adait va.cuua until aftar crucible has bean
fiIled. Rinse saaple into crucible with EiniBuE of hot (gO -100 ) water. Reoove tracuur, break up Dat, and fill crucible nithhot trater. Filter lieuid and repeat rashing procedure.
4. tlash twice with acetona in sale [anner and suck
dry. Dry crucibles at 1OO C. for I hours or overnight and t eigh.
5. Report yteld of racoveled neutral-detergeut
fiber as percant of ce11-paI1 constituents. EEtiuate ce11
soluble raterial by subtracting this value frou 100.
2.2 Acid-detelgent fiber
The acid-detergent fiber procedure provides a. rapid
uethod for lignocellulose deternination in fEadstuffs. The
residue also includes silica. Tha dif?erenee betreen the cE11
wal.l and acid-detergent fiber is an estiuate of henicellulose;however, this diffelence does. include so[a plotsin attached to
cell rall. The acid-detergent fiber is.used as a prepalatoly
step for liEnin d6ter[inat ion.
Reagent required: 2, 3 in Neutral-detelgent
1. Acid-detergent solution.. .. ..... 1 1.
Sulfuric acid, reagent
grade standized to 1 N.
( 100=percent assay) 9..... 43.04
Cetyl triuethylauuon iun
bronide (CTAB ), techn icalgrade. ...... tt. .... 2A
and
4 Copyright by Mahidol University
^
^
R
c-7
Weigh sulfulic acid and lake up to voluue with
distilled water at 20 C. Check noraality by titration before
addition of detarE;ent. Then add CTAB and stir.
Analvtical Procedures
1. Weirrh 1 g. ai!-dry sanPle lSround to Pass 20 to
30 uesh or the approxinate equivalent of ret uaterial into a
beaker suitable for ref luxinEi.
2. Add 100 u1. cold (roon teuPelatule) acid-
detergEnt solution and 2 aI . decahydronapthalene ' Heat to
boiling in 5 to 10 Einutes. Reduce heat as boiling beglns, to
avoid foaring.. Reflux 60 uinutes f,roo onset of boilinE; adiust
boiling to a slow, even level.
3. Eilter on a previously tared Gooch crucible,
which is set on tha filter uanifold; use liEht suction. Braak uP
the filtered nat rith a rod and rash trice r'ith hot lrata! (90 -100 C.). Rinse sides of the crucibLe in tha saEe Eanne!.
4. Repeat rash rith acetone untll it le[oves no
Dore color; break up all luuPs so that the sovsnt coEes into
contact rith all particles of flber5. Optional rash rith haxane. Hexane should be
added while crucible still contains soue ac€tone. (Hexane can be
o[itted if lunping is not a problea in ligni.n analysis) Suck the
acid-detargent fiber free of hexane and dry at 100 C. for 8 hours
or overnight and weigh.
6. Calculate acid― detergent fiber:
(■ ― W ) (100〉 /S = ADFCopyright by Mahidol University
grhero:
c-8
neight of oven-dry crucible including fiber;tared weight of oven-dry crucible;oven-dry sauple seight
2.3 Acid-detergent l ignin
In the acid-detergent lignin procedure, the acid-detergent fiber(ADF) procedure i.s used as a preparatoly step.The detergent re'oves the protein and other acid-solubLe aatEri.althat would interfere nith the lignin deteruination. The ADF
residue consists of eetlulose, lignin, cutin, and acid-so1ubleash (nainly silica). Treatnent rith ?Z percent sulfuric aciddissorves cel1ulose. AshinE of the residue wil.1 deteruine thecrude lignin fraction ineluding cutin. For silica deterainationand separation of cutin and liEnin.
Reagent required: Z, S, S in Acid-detergent fiber and
1. Asbestos--place 100 6. ( tong fiber) in a 3-I.flask with 850 uI. water. Add 1,400 nI . concentrated H SO
24(technieal gEade), uix, and let cool at roou telrperatu!. for z
hours. Filter on a large Buchnor funnel, and nash nith Eater.Resuspend Dat in ratEr and pour into a squale baE seern fron a
rectangle of fiberglass rindow sereening of 14x18 uesh (about 1
utr.) (the bag should be at least lE inches (46 cu.) ride by lzinches (30 cu.) deep). Ilash by innersion and agitation in water
to reaove fine particles. Ash the recovered asbestos in a
fulnace at EOO C. for 16 hours. Store in dry fora until needed.
Used asbestos can be renashed, ashed, and reused.
0
1
W
W
S
ヽ
‐
2. Sulfuric acid, 72 percent by "eight― ―Calculate
Copyright by Mahidol University
c-9
lrraDs acid and needed in 1 1. of solution by:
100x98.08x12 noles = grans acid neededH SO assay(percent )24(1,000x1 .634)-grans acid = glaas Hater needed
Ifeigh aaount of rater into a 1 I. HCA voluuetricflask (rith a bulb in the neck) and add the calculated a'ount ofH SO slorly rith occasional swirl.ing. Caution!F1ask [ust be24cooled in a water bath (sink) in order to add the required Feightof sulfuric acid. Cool to 20 C. and check if voluae is corlect.If voluue is too saall, take out about 1.S ul. and add 2.5 !!I .
trat6r. Repeat, if necessary. If voluue is too large, take out S
o1. and add 4.45 aI. H SO }leniscus should be rithin a 0.S cD.24of calibration nark at 20
Analwtical Procedures
1. Prepare the aeid-detergent fiber.2. Add to the crucible containing the acid-
deterEent fiber an arount of asbestos about equar to the voruleof fiber, Cover the contents of the crucible with cooled (1S C.)72 percent H SO and stir with a glass rod to a saooth paste,24breaking all lunps.. Firr crucibre about half full rith acid and
stir. Let glass rod reaain in crucible; refill nith ?2 pereentH SO and stir at hourly intelva1s as acid drains away. Crucible24do not need to be kept full at all tiue. Three additionssuffice. Keep crucible at 20 to 28 C. After 3 hours, filteroff as auch acid as possible lrith vacuun; then sash contents withhot erater until free fron aeid. Rinse and reuove stirring lod.
3. Dry crueible at 100 C. and lreigh.
ハ
Copyright by Mahidol University
ヽ.
550 C. _● o■ 3 hours, and then coo■ t。 100 c. and weigh.
5. Calculate ac■ d―detergent lign■ n:
(Lx100)/S = ADL
where: L = loss upon ign■ tion aFter 72
H SO treatEent;24
S = oven-dry sauple lreight
percent
口‐ ̈
「
一ヽ
4. Ignite cruCibiζあ11ぶ le_ furnace at 500・ 110
17941
Copyright by Mahidol University