high potential incident intervention. background 2 the principle policy of downer blasting services...
TRANSCRIPT
High Potential Incident Intervention
Background
2
• The principle policy of Downer Blasting Services regarding to our staff is “Zero Harm”
• The success of this principle is measured by Lag and Lead indicators with targets based on the previous years achievements and industry best practice.
LAG Indicator Targets
3
• Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate < 5.0
• Medical Treatment Injury Frequency Rate < 2.5
• Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate < 1.0
LEAD Indicator Targets
4
• 1 “Take 5” per operator per shift• 1 “Safety Behaviour Observation” per
supervisor per week• 1 “Hazard Report” per supervisor per week• 1 “Safety Toolbox Meeting” per supervisor per
week
LEAD Indicator Targets
5
• 1 “Safe Task Observation” per supervisor per month
• 1 “Site Safety Inspection” per supervisor per month
• Preliminary incidents investigation conducted by supervisor regardless of consequence level
Safety Statistics
6
• Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4.2• Medical Treatment Injury Frequency Rate 1.4• Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate 0.0• All Lead Indicator KPI targets achieved
Safety Culture
7
• Based on the LAG and LEAD Indicator statistics the safety culture appears to be healthy.
• While reviewing the incident data a disturbing trend appeared “High Potential Incidents”
• “HPI’s” have low “Actual Consequences” but have high “Potential Consequences”
• The business was experiencing 1 HPI per month
HPI Review
8
• An evaluation of the Lead Indicator data identified “Quantity” not “Quality”
• Not all HPI’s investigations reflected the potential consequences
• Investigation findings not shared with the entire business
HPI Investigations Reviewed
9
• Failure to follow the procedure• Training focused on compliance• Risk Assessments failed to identify all
potential hazardous scenarios • Lack of supervision
HPI Intervention Strategy
10
• Lead Indicator KPI’s changed to focus on quality to achieve improvement
• All HPI’s are managed as an actual high level severity incident
• All HPI investigations are presented to the CEO
HPI Intervention Strategy
11
• The intervention requires two projects to run simultaneously
• Project 1: Conduct “safe Task Observations”
• Project 2: Complete restructure of “Training”
HPI Intervention Strategy“Safe Task Observations”
12
• Prioritised list for procedural review• Every operation conducts the same review • Week 1 the supporting risk assessment is
reviewed• Week 2 the procedure is reviewed during
application
HPI Intervention Strategy“Safe Task Observations”
13
• The data from the risk assessments and procedural reviews is collated and summarised
• This data is then feed to the Training Project team
HPI Intervention Strategy“Training”
14
• Process mapping• Improved document control• Consistency in the material• Updated Risk Assessments
HPI Intervention Strategy“Training”
15
• New Safe Work Procedures• eLearning development and
implementation• Support material – handbooks,
reference guides
HPI Intervention Strategy“Training”
16
• In field electronic tablets• Improved transition for staff between
sites• Minimal hard copy training records
Key Aspects of the Process Map
17
Identify the Risk Management Required
Identify the Critical Task
Identify the Document Type / Document Hierarchy
Identify the Key Content of the Document
Identify the Emergency Procedures
Critical Task Steps (what to do / Individual Activities)
Steps within the Individual Activities (how to do)
DBS Process Map Rules
18
• Critical Tasks must cover the key tasks associated with any process
• The map must include all of the individual activities undertaken within the collective critical task (horizontal flow)
• The process map should be limited to a single silo of steps within any individual activity (vertical)
• All document must match the safety management systems document hierarchy
• All critical tasks must end with the appropriate emergency management / contingency plan (what do I do if it goes wrong) document
Example Process Map “Explosives Loading Area Preparation”
19
<Fun
ctio
n>
Current Generic
Standard Work Prac
Critical Task:- Explosives
Loading Area Preparation
What are the Key Headings
in the SWP
1. Risk Assessment for the Work
Area
1. Confirm the Requirements of the Blasting
Plan
1. Risk Assessment for the Work
Area
2. Accessing the Explosives Loading Area
3. Preparing the Ground Surface - Personnel
5. Preparing Parking and
Turning Areas for Vehicles
6. Managing Surface Water
7. Ancillary Mining
Activities
8. Site Notification of
the ELA
1. Tools and Equipment Required
1. Tools and Equipment Required
1. Preparing to Prime the Blastholes
1. Preparing to Prime the Blastholes
1. Preparing to Prime the Blastholes
1. The Location of the Primers within the Blasthole
Profile
1. Identifying the Size of the
Gas Bag
1. Identifying the Presence
of Hot / Reactive Ground
1. Tools and Equipment Required
1. Recording the Dip Data
1. Backfill Material
1. Re-Drilling the Blastholes
2. Distribution of the
Detonators and Boosters
3. Assembling the Primer
4. Positioning the Primer within the Blasthole
5. Securing the Downlines
6. Removal / Recovery of the Primers
2. Distribution of the
Detonating Cord and Boosters
3. Assembling the Primer
4. Positioning the Primer within the Blasthole
5. Securing the Downlines
Removal / Recovery of the Primers
2. Distribution of the
Detonators and Boosters
3. Assembling the Primer
(Cast Booster)
4. Assembling the Primer (Packaged Product)
5. Positioning the Primer within the Blastholes
6. Securing the Downlines
7. Removal / Recovery of the Primers
4. Managing Lost /
Unaccounted for Explosives
Products
3. Identifying and Managing Defective or Deteriorated
Product
2. Primer Selection
5. Reconciling the Products
Used
2. Storage and Transport of Gas Bags
3. Inflating a Gas Bag
7. Use in a Product
Column to Separate products
4. Use in Blastholes Containing
Water
5. Use During the Deck
Loading of Blastholes
6. The Positioning the
Gas Bag within the Blasthole
(Deck) Profile
9. Use to Secure Partially Loaded
Blastholes
2. Measuring the
Temperature of the
Blastholes
3. Testing for Reactive Ground
4. Recording the Data
6. Recording the Data
5. Identifying and Managing
Water Recharge
Rates
4. Managing the Run off
Water
3. Dewatering the Blasthole
2. Positioning the
Dewatering Vehicle
2. Backfilling the Short Blastholes
3. Separation of Re-Drilling
operations and Blasthole
Loading
4. Recording the Data
2. Equipment Used to Backfill
Blastholes
4. Backfilling Blastholes Containing
Water / Mud
3. Backfilling Dry Blastholes
5. Recording the Data
2. Assessing The Dip data
9. Changing the Product Selection
(Sleep times)
7. Identifying Hot and / or
Reactive ground
6. Identifying Water within
the Blastholes
5. Identifying the Location of
the Mineral Body
4. Identifying Blastholes to be Backfilled
3. Identifying Blastholes to be Re-Drilled
6. Ancillary Mining
Activities
5. Manages Changes to
the Explosives Loading Area
Perimeter
3. Rules on Entry to the Explosives
Loading Area
4. Identifying Prohibited
Items within the Explosives Loading Area
2. Erecting Visual and Physical Barriers
9. Marking Abnormal Blastholes
6. Dipping Blastholes with Wet /
Muddy Sides
5. Dipping Blastholes
That Contain Water
4. Dipping Dry Blastholes
3. Traffic Management
Within the Explosives
Loading Area
2. Hazard Identification
10. Addressing
Areas of Concern
9. Site Notification of
the ELA
8. Accepting the Separation
Distances ELA /
Ancillary Mining Act
7. Accepting the Surface
Water Management within the ELA
6. Accepting the Areas for
Vehicle Parking and
Turning
3. Accepting the Ground Surface - Personnel
2. Accepting the Access to
the ELA
6. Addressing Areas of Concern
5. Identification of the Blast Outcomes
4. Managing the Product Selection
3. Reviewing the Blast Design
Parameters
2. Confirm the Quality of the Drilling Plan
Managing the Dewatering
of Blastholes (SWP)
Managing the Dip Data
(Standard)
Managing Hot and Reactive Ground (SWP)
Preparing the
Explosives Loading Area(Procedure)
The Use of Det Cord
Primers in Blastholes
(SWP)
Managing the Backfill of Blastholes
(SWP)
Delineating the
Explosives Loading Area
(SWP)
The Use of Electronic Primers in Blastholes
(SWP)
Is there a Site Specific JHA
for each of the documented
tasks
Verify the Blast Plan
(Procedure)
Is there a Generic Risk Assessment
for the Critical Task?
The Use of NonEl
Primers in Blastholes
(SWP)
Priming Blastholes(Standard)
The Use of Gas Bags
(SWP)
Acceptance of the
Explosives Loading Area(Procedure)
Emergency Procedures within the
Explosives Loading Area
Managing the Re-Drilling of
Blastholes (SWP)
Blasthole Preparation
(SWP)
8. Managing the Dip Data
7. Installation and Marking the Wooden
Pegs
8. Recording the Blasthole
Dip Data
8. Use During the Stemming of Blastholes
4. Preparing the Ground Surface - Vehicles
9. Addressing the Areas of
Concern
4. Assessing the Drill Pattern
5. Accepting the Ground Surface - Vehicles