$IONYSIUS6OL88)))$ECn

0OLYTHEISMAND)NDIVIDUALITYINTHE(ENADIC-ANIFOLD

%DWARD0"UTLER

)NHISBOOK4HE.EO0LATONISTS4HOMAS7HITTAKER REJECTED THENOTION THAT THEDOCTRINEOF THEHENADSWASMERELYhANATTEMPT TOlNDAMOREDElNITEPLACEFORPOLYTHEISMTHANWASMARKEDOUTINTHESYSTEMOF0LOTINUSvANDAPPROVEDOF THEEFFORT hTOlND IN IT AMOREPHILOSOPHICALMEANINGvREMARKINGTHATALREADYINHISDAYhMUCHHASBEENWRITTENUPONTHEQUESTIONWHATTHEHENADSOF0ROCLUSREALLYMEANvIBID!NDYETDESPITETHEEXPLOSIONOFINTERESTINRECENTDECADESIN.EOPLATONISMANDINLATERANTIQUITYGENERALLYINTERESTINTHEHENADOLOGYPARTICULARLYINTERESTINITShMEANINGvHASBEENLACKINGASMEASUREDBOTHBYTHERELATIVEPAUCITYOFLITERATUREONTHEHENADSASWELLASBYTHETONEOFMUCHTHATHASBEENWRITTEN)WILLDISCUSSATTHEENDOFTHISESSAYWHAT)REGARDASTHECONSTRUCTIVETRENDSINTHEPREVIOUSLITERATUREONTHEHENADSAFTER)HAVEPRESENTEDMYOWNREADINGOFSOMEOFWHAT)REGARDASTHEMOSTIMPORTANTPRIMARYTEXTS)NTHElRSTPLACEHOWEVER)WISHTOISOLATETHETENDENCIESWHICH)BELIEVETOHAVEOBSTRUCTEDPROGRESSINUNDERSTANDINGTHEDOCTRINE4HElRSTISTHETENDENCYTOOVERLOOKUNIQUELOGICALANDSTRUCTURALCHARAC

TERISTICSOFTHEHENADICMANIFOLDWHICHSETITAPARTFROMANYONTICMANIFOLDONTICMANIFOLDONTIC)FALOGICREALLYDISTINCTFROMTHATAPPLYINGTOBEINGSAPPLIESTOSUPRAESSENTIALENTITIESTHEHENADSSHALLNOLONGERSEEMASTHEYOTHERWISEMIGHTAMERESTRUCTURALCOMPLEMENTWITHINTHESYSTEM/NEWOULDSEEINSHORTTHEWORKTHEHENADSDO4HEWHOLECONCEPTOFTHESUPRAESSENTIALORhEXISTENTIALvTHATWHICHLIESBEYOND"EINGWOULDTHUSACQUIRETRUECONTENTWHEREASOTHERWISEITMIGHTSEEMMEREHYPERBOLEOROBSCURANTISM4HECONTEMPORARYUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEHENADOLOGYHASALSOBEENHIN

DEREDBYTHEINABILITYOFCOMMENTATORSTOINTEGRATETHEDOCTRINESTHEOLOGICALANDPHILOSOPHICALDIMENSIONS4HEHENADSAREALSOTHE'ODSANDTHISHASCAUSEDINEXPLICABLEPROBLEMSFORCOMMENTATORSWHOWOULDNOTTOPUTITBLUNTLYlNDITSODIFlCULTTOACCEPTTHEINTERPLAYANDINTERDEPENDENCEOFPHILOSOPHYANDTHEOLOGYINAMONOTHEISTICPHILOSOPHERWHETHER#HRISTIAN*EWISH OR-USLIM )N SUCH A CASE ONEWOULD RECOGNIZE THE CONSTRUCTIVE4HE.EO0LATONISTS!3TUDYINTHE(ISTORYOF(ELLENISMNDED#AMBRIDGE#AMBRIDGE

50RESS

%$7!2$0"54,%2

CONTRIBUTIONTHATTHEPROBLEMOFRATIONALLYARTICULATINGARELIGIOUSPOSITIONCOULDMAKETOAPHILOSOPHERSTHOUGHTONEWOULDNOTSEETHEPHILOSOPHERINQUESTIONASMERELYENGAGEDINSPECIALPLEADING!NIMPLICITASSUMPTIONFORMANYCOMMENTATORSWITHRESPECTTOTHEHENADOLOGYSEEMSTOBETHEFOLLOWINGIFTHEIDENTITYOFTHEHENADSANDTHE'ODSISTOBETAKENSERIOUSLYTHENTHEPHILOSOPHICALSIGNIlCANCEOFTHEHENADSMUSTBEMINIMALWHILEIFTHEIRPHILOSOPHICALSIGNIlCANCEISTOBEAFlRMEDTHENTHEIRIDENTITYWITHTHE'ODSMUSTBEAMERECONCESSIONTOVULGAROPINIONEVENIFTHEVULGAROPINIONIS0ROCLUSOWN5PONEITHERALTERNATIVETHEINTEGRATIONOFTHEPHILOSOPHICALANDTHEOLOGICALDIMENSIONSOFTHEHENADOLOGYISRULEDOUTFROMTHESTART4HISDICHOTOMYISALREADYPRESENTIN7HITTAKERWHOEXPLICITLYOPPOSESTHETHEOLOGICAL ANDPHILOSOPHICAL READINGS OF THE DOCTRINE AND REMAINS THEDOMINANTTHEMEINTHELITERATURE.ORHAVEMODERNCOMMENTATORSINTERESTEDINTHEhMYSTICALvELEMENTSOF

.EOPLATONISMASHASBEENTHECASEPARTICULARLYAMONG&RANCOPHONESCHOLARSSUCHAS*EAN4ROUILLARDINGENERALADVANCEDTHEUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEHENADOLOGY4HEINTRINSICVALUE0ROCLUSACCORDSTOTHESPECIlCIDENTITIESNAMESANDNATURESOFTHETRADITIONAL'ODSOFHISOWNANDOTHERNATIONSISAWKWARDFORTHEMYSTICWHOWOULDlNDCOMMONGROUNDWITHTHERATIONALISTINTHEIRDISDAINFORTHEBELIEFIN'ODSAND'ODDESSESASDIVINEINDIVIDUALSWHOARENOTTHEMASKSASPECTSORPOTENCIESOFANYTHINGNOTINSHORTWHATSBUTWHATSBUTWHAT WHOS"ETWEENTHEMYSTICSBEATIlCDISSOLUTIONOFALLOTHERNESSANDTHERATIONALISTSREDUCTIONOFINDIVIDUALSTOACCIDENTSOFTHEINlMASPECIESTHEREISNOROOMFORANAPPRECIATIONOFTHEPOLYTHEISTSEXPERIENCEOFWONDERATTHEEXISTENCEOFUNIQUEDIVINEINDIVIDUALS7HATISTHESOURCEOFTHEPRESUPPOSITIONTHATTHEFUNCTIONOFTHEHEN

ADOLOGYCANNOTBEBOTHAPOLOGETICANDSYSTEMATIC/NECOULDATTRIBUTEITANDSYSTEMATIC/NECOULDATTRIBUTEITANDSIMPLYTOTHEDIFlCULTYMODERNCOMMENTATORSHAVEOFTENHADTAKINGTHECLASSICALPAGANISMOFTHE7ESTSERIOUSLYANDINFACTNON7ESTERNRELIGIONSTOTHEDEGREETHATTHEYRESEMBLECLASSICALPAGANISM!HABITOFLONGSTANDINGSEESTHEDEVELOPMENTOFPHILOSOPHYINTHE7ESTASINEXTRICABLYTIEDTOA

!#,LOYDFOREXAMPLEINHISh0ROCESSIONAND$IVISIONIN0ROCLUSvIN3OULANDTHE3TRUCTUREOF"EINGIN,ATE.EOPLATONISM3YRIANUS0ROCLUSAND3IMPLICIUSED(*"LUMENTHALAND!#,LOYD,IVERPOOL,IVERPOOL50RESSATTRIBUTESTOhCRITICSOFTHEHENADSvTHEPOSITIONTHAThTHEIRIDENTIlCATIONWITHTRADITIONALGODSISBUILTINTOTHETHEORYvF REmEXIVELYASSUMINGTHATTHETHEOLOGICALDIMENSIONOFTHETHEORYMUSTOPERATEATTHEEXPENSEOFITSPHILOSOPHICALINTEGRITY&ORTHEHISTORYOFTHE&RENCHRETRIEVALOF.EOPLATONISMINTHELASTCENTURY)AMINDEBTED

TO7AYNE*(ANKEYSEXHAUSTIVESURVEYIN/NE(UNDRED9EARSOF.EOPLATONISMIN&RANCE!"RIEF0HILOSOPHICAL(ISTORY0EETERSFORTHCOMINGAREVISEDTRANSLATIONANDEXTENSIONOFHIS0HILOSOPHICAL(ISTORY0EETERSFORTHCOMINGAREVISEDTRANSLATIONANDEXTENSIONOFHIS0HILOSOPHICAL(ISTORY #ENT!NS$E.OPLATONISME%N&RANCE5NE"RVE(ISTOIRE0HILOSOPHIQUE#OLLECTION:TSIS0ARIS1UBEC*6RIN,ES0RESSESDEL5NIVERSIT,AVALANDTO0ROF(ANKEYFORPOINTINGOUTTHENECESSITYOFTAKINGSEPARATEACCOUNTOFTHE&RANCOPHONESCHOLARSHIP

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

PROGRESSIVEESTRANGEMENTFROMPAGANISM4HISVIEWFEATURESINAPARTICULARMETANARRATIVEREGARDINGTHESPIRITUALHISTORYOFTHE7ESTANDOFTHEWORLD4O TRACE THEHISTORYOF THISMETANARRATIVE AND CRITICIZE THENOTIONSUPONWHICHITRESTSISNOTTHETASKOFTHISESSAY,ETITSUFlCETOSAYTHATWITHINTHISMETANARRATIVEPOLYTHEISMISSOMETHINGANYCONNECTIONTOWHICHCOULDONLYTAINT0ROCLUSANDTHATTHISMETANARRATIVEMAKESITSELFFELTNEARLYASMUCHINTHEPROPONENTSOFAhMYSTICALvREADINGOF.EOPLATONISMASTHOSEWHOPREFERAhRATIONALISTvREADING)TISNOTMERELYADELICACYWITHRESPECTTOEXPOSINGTHEPREJUDICESOFPREVI

OUSGENERATIONSOFSCHOLARSWHICHURGESFORBEARANCEINPURSUINGTHEMATTERFROMTHISVIEWPOINTHOWEVERFORTHISMETANARRATIVEDOESNOTSUFlCEBYITSELFTOEXPLAINTHECOMPLEXOFASSUMPTIONSWHICHHAVEPREVENTEDANINTEGRATEDUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEHENADOLOGY)TISAMORELIKELYASWELLASAMORECHARITABLESUPPOSITIONTHATTHEROOTSOFTHEINCAPACITYTOINTEGRATEITSPHILOSOPHICALANDTHEOLOGICALDIMENSIONSLIERATHERINTHElRSTPROBLEM)OUTLINEDNAMELYTHEFAILURETORECOGNIZEASPECIALLOGICOFSUPRAESSENTIALEXISTENCEIN0ROCLUS&ORITISNOTMERELYAQUESTIONOFAREmEXIVECULTURALBIASPRIVILEGINGMONOTHEISMBUTBEYONDTHISOFALOGICOFUNITYANDMULTIPLICITYFORWHICHINTELLIGIBILITYCANONLYCOMEATTHECOSTOFREDUCINGMULTIPLICITYTOUNITYANDTHEDIVERSETOTHESAME!FRESHINVESTIGATIONOFTHEPOTENTIALFUNCTIONOFTHEHENADOLOGYWITHINAPOLYTHEISTICECONOMYHASTHEREFORESOMETHINGTOOFFERABOVEANDBEYONDTHEPROGRESSIVEEMANCIPATIONFROMARCHAICPREJUDICES0OLYTHEISMISATHEOLOGICALPOSITIONUNIQUELYSUITEDTOSTIMULATENOVELSOLUTIONSTOPHILOSOPHICALPROBLEMSCONCERNINGTHELOGICOFUNITYANDMULTIPLICITYFORIFTHEPOLYTHEISTWISHESTOTAKEFULLADVANTAGEOFACONCEPTUALAPPARATUSSUCHAS.EOPLATONICLOGICTHATINHERENTLYPRIVILEGESUNITYOVERMULTIPLICITYWITHOUTATTHESAMETIMECOMPROMISINGHISHERTHEOLOGICALPOSITIONSHEMUSTFASHIONOUTOFTHECONCEPTSOFUNITYANDMULTIPLICITYINSTRUMENTSSUBTLEENOUGHTOBEAPPLIEDWITHINAPOLYTHEISTICFRAMEWORKWITHOUTDOINGITVIOLENCE)NTHISARTICLE)WISHTOSHOWHOWAPPROACHINGTHEHENADOLOGYINTHISWAYCANINFACTSHEDLIGHTONTHEDOCTRINESMOSTRECONDITEASPECTSINPARTICULARBYSTRESSINGTHEVALUEOFTHEHENADSINDIVIDUALITY)NHIS0LATONIC4HEOLOGY0ROCLUSSTATESTHAThALLTHATHAVEEVERTOUCHED

UPONTHEOLOGYHAVECALLEDTHINGSlRSTACCORDINGTONATURE'ODSANDHAVESAID THAT THE THEOLOGICAL SCIENCE CONCERNS THESEv(EGOESON TO EXPLAINTHATSINCEFORSOMEWHATRANKSlRSTISTHECORPOREALTHE'ODSAREFORSUCHASTHESEACERTAINKINDOFBODY0ROCLUSINTENDSTHE3TOICSHERE/THERSHECONTINUESREGARDSOULASPRIMARY&ORTHESETHEBESTOFSOULSARE'ODS4HESE

4HOLOGIE0LATONICIENNEOLOGIE0LATONICIENNE VOLSEDANDTRANS($3AFFREYAND,'7ESTERINK0ARIS,ES"ELLES,ETTRES n ;HENCEFORTH04 TRANSLATIONSMINE INCORPORATING ELEMENTS OF04 TRANSLATIONSMINE INCORPORATING ELEMENTS OF044HOMAS4AYLOR=)

%$7!2$0"54,%2

ARE APPARENTLY!NAXAGOREANS/THERS AGAINPLACE INTELLECT BEFORE ALL ELSEANDTHESEHEEXPLAINSCONSIDERTHEOLOGYANDTHEDISCUSSIONOFINTELLECTUALESSENCEASONEANDTHESAME4HESEARE0ERIPATETICS.OW0LATOACCORDINGTO0ROCLUSLAIDTHEGROUNDWORKFORADIFFERENTSORTOFTHEOLOGYALTOGETHERBECAUSEOFTHEPRINCIPLETHATHEPLACESlRSTNAMELYUNITY5NITYISTHEMOSTGENERICOFCONCEPTSNOTEVERYTHINGPARTICIPATESOFSOULNOREVENOFINTELLECTORBEINGFORTHESEAREONLYENJOYED0ROCLUSEXPLAINSBYSUCHTHINGSASSUBSISTACCORDINGTOFORM5NITYHOWEVERISATLEASTINSOMERESPECTPRIORTOFORM)NATHEOLOGICALDISCOURSEBASEDUPONTHECONCEPTOFUNITYTHE'ODSWILLBElRSTBYVIRTUEOFTHEIRMODEOFUNITY7HATTHENISTHEMODEOFUNITYOFTHE'ODS7EKNOWTHATITISAUNITYPRIORTOFORMBUTWHATDOESTHISMEAN-OREOVERHOWAREWETODISTINGUISHTHESPECIALCHARACTERISTICSOFATHEOLOGYBASEDUPONTHECONCEPTOFUNITYRATHERTHANANYOFTHEOTHERCONCEPTSNAMED)NWHATLIESITSSUPERIORITYTOTHEOTHERTHEOLOGIES7EKNOWTHATITISBASEDONACONCEPTTHATISINITSELFMOREGENERICANDHENCESUPERIOR"UTA0LATONISTMUSTBELIEVETHATITWILLALSOFORTHATVERYREASONBEASCIENCEMOREADEQUATETOITSOBJECT,ETUSTURNTOATEXTOF0ROCLUSWHEREHEDEALSWITHTHEVERYISSUEOFTHE

MODEOFUNITYOFTHEHENADSOR'ODSASCONTRASTEDTOTHATOFFORMS)NAPASSAGEFROMHISCOMMENTARYON0LATOS0ARMENIDES0ROCLUSEXPLAINSTHAT

ALL THEHENADS ARE IN EACHOTHER AND AREUNITEDWITH EACHOTHER AND THEIR UNITY ISFAR GREATER THAN THE COMMUNITY AND SAMENESS AMONGBEINGS )N THESE TOO THERE ISCOMPOUNDINGOFFORMSANDLIKENESSANDFRIENDSHIPANDPARTICIPATIONINONEANOTHERBUTTHEUNITYOFTHESEFORMERENTITIESINASMUCHASITISAUNITYOFHENADSISFARMOREUNIFORMANDINEFFABLEANDUNSURPASSABLEFORTHEYAREALLINALLOFTHEMWHICHISNOTTHECASEWITHTHEFORMS4HESEAREPARTICIPATEDINBYEACHOTHERBUTTHEYARENOTALLINALL!NDYETINSPITEOFTHISDEGREEOFUNITYINTHATREALMHOWMARVELOUSANDUNMIXEDISTHEIRPURITYANDTHEINDIVIDUALITYOFEACHOFTHEMISAMUCHMOREPERFECTTHINGTHANTHEDIFFERENCEOFTHEFORMSPRESERVINGASITDOESUNMIXEDALLTHEDIVINEENTITIESANDTHEIRPROPERPOWERSDISTINCTx

)NTHISPASSAGETHEREISNOTHINGWHATSOEVERABOUTTHE/NE)TSELFRATHERITISAQUESTIONOFASTRAIGHTFORWARDCONTRASTBETWEENHENADSANDHENADSANDHENADS FORMSORFORMSORFORMSMORESIMPLYBEINGS4HETEXTLAYSOUTASERIESOFCONTRASTINGCHARACTERISTICS4HEHENADSAREALLINALLORALLINALLORALLINALL ALLINEACHINWHICHLIESTHEIRhUNITYvHENSISSIS SISSIS.OTETHATTHISUNITYISNOTAMATTEROFTHEIRUNIONWITHORINTHE/NEBUTTHEPRESENCEOFALLTHEHENADSINEACHOTHER4HEhUNITYvOFTHEHENADSTHUS

0ROCLUS#OMMENTARYON0LATOS0ARMENIDESTRANS*-$ILLONAND'2-ORROW0RINC0ROCLUS#OMMENTARYON0LATOS0ARMENIDESTRANS*-$ILLONAND'2-ORROW0RINC0ROCLUS#OMMENTARYON0LATOSETON0RINCETON50RESS;HENCEFORTH)0TRANSLATIONSOCCASIONALLYMODIlED=n)0TRANSLATIONSOCCASIONALLYMODIlED=n)02EFERENCESARETOTHEPAGINATIONIN)N0LATONIS0ARMENIDEMED6#OUSIN0ARIS$URANDREPRINT(ILDESHEIM/LMSEXCEPTFORTHOSEFOLLOWEDBY@+WHICHREFERTOTHE,ATINPORTIONASIN$ILLON-ORROW

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

CONCEIVEDFAREXCEEDSTHATWHICHBEINGSPOSSESSBYVIRTUEOFTHECORRESPONDINGPHENOMENAAMONGTHEMNAMELYCOMMUNITYSAMENESSCOMPOUNDINGOFFORMSLIKENESSFRIENDSHIPANDPARTICIPATIONINONEANOTHER0ARTICIPATIONINONEANOTHERINPARTICULARISMENTIONEDTWICEANDTHUSMAKESTHECLEARESTCONTRASTTOTHEALLINALLOFTHEHENADS3OFARITWOULDSEEMASIFWHATISATSTAKEHEREISADIFFERENCEINTHEDEGREETOWHICHENTITIESAREUNITEDWITHEACHOTHERWITH THEVARIOUS RELATIONSHIPSMENTIONEDASEXISTINGAMONGBEINGSSERVINGTOUNITEBEINGSWITHEACHOTHERTOALESSERDEGREETHANTHEDEGREETOWHICHTHEHENADSAREUNITEDWITHEACHOTHERh5NITYvTHENWOULDBEAMATTEROFTHEREDUCTIONOFDIFFERENCETOSAMENESS"UTTHEN0ROCLUSPROCEEDSTOCONTRASTTHEPURITYANDINDIVIDUALITYIDIOTIDIOTIDIOT SSOFTHEHENADSTOTHEDIFFERSOFTHEHENADSTOTHEDIFFERSENCEHETEROTHETEROTHETEROT SSOFTHEFORMS)TCANNOTBEAMATTERTHENOFENTITIESSIMPLYSOFTHEFORMS)TCANNOTBEAMATTERTHENOFENTITIESSIMPLYSBECOMINGMOREUNITEDWITHEACHOTHERANDHENCELESSDIFFERENTIATEDFROMEACHOTHERASWEASCENDTOTHE/NE)TSELF!HENADISBOTHMOREUNITEDTOTHEOTHERHENADSTHANABEINGISTOOTHERBEINGSBUTALSOMOREDISTINCTFROMTHEOTHERHENADSTHANABEINGISFROMOTHERBEINGS4HEREAREONLYTWOOPTIONS0ROCLUSISEITHERSIMPLYPOSITINGANIRRATIONALCOINCIDENCEOFOPPOSITESORPROPOUNDINGAPHILOSOPHICALDOCTRINEOFMORESUBTLETYTHANHASHITHERTOBEENAPPRECIATED4HATHEINTENDSWHATHESAYSHERETOBEARPHILOSOPHICALWEIGHTISINDICATEDBYHISREMARKSAPAGELATER

3OMUCHTHENMAYBESAIDCONCERNINGTHESITUATIONOFTHEPRIMALHENADSANDTHEIRCOMMUNIONWITHANDDISTINCTIONFROMONEANOTHEROFWHICHWEAREWONTTOCALLTHEONEINDIVIDUALITY;IDIOTIDIOTIDIOT TA=THEOTHERUNITY;HENSINSIN =DISTINGUISHINGTHEMTHUSALSOBYNAMEFROMTHESAMENESSANDDIFFERENCEMANIFESTEDATTHELEVELOF2EAL"EING

4HEATTEMPTTOESTABLISHTECHNICALTERMINOLOGYRESPECTINGTHEDIFFERENCEINQUESTIONHARDLYSEEMSCONSISTENTWITHANAPPEALTOACOINCIDENCEOFOPPOSITESBEYONDOURRATIONALPOWERS,ETUSTRYTHENTOBETTERUNDERSTANDWHAT0ROCLUSMEANSBYTHECONTRASTHEDRAWSHERE

)0)0)0!#,LOYDSh0ROCESSIONAND$IVISIONIN0ROCLUSvOFFERSACONTRASTINGINTERPRETATION

OF)0)0)0 ,LOYDSEESNOMOREINTHEPASSAGETHANTHATTHEHENADSAREDESCRIBEDhINEFFECTASHAVINGALLTHEPOSITIVEANDFORMALPROPERTIESOFFORMSBUTTOAGREATERDEGREEv"UTINFACT0ROCLUSLAYSOUTINTHISPASSAGEASERIESOFSPECIlCCHARACTERISTICSWITHRESPECTTOWHICHHENADICEXISTENCEDIFFERSFUNDAMENTALLYFROMTHEMODEOFEXISTENCEOFTHEFORMS4HEHENADICCHARACTERISTICSAREJUXTAPOSEDWITHTHECORRESPONDINGFORMALCHARACTERISTICSTOCONTRASTTHEMNOTTOPOSITADIFFERENCECONTRASTTHEMNOTTOPOSITADIFFERENCECONTRASTOFDEGREEASISSHOWNBYTHEFACTTHAT0ROCLUSSEEKSTODEVELOPADISTINCTANDPARALLELTERMINOLOGYTOREFERTOTHEHENADICCHARACTERISTICS4HATTHEREISACORRESPONDENCEAPARALLELISMISARESULTOFTHEFACTTHATFORMALBEINGISULTIMATELYAPRODUCTANPRODUCTANPRODUCT EFFECTOFHENADICEXISTENCE"UTSINCE,LOYDEFFECTOFHENADICEXISTENCE"UTSINCE,LOYDEFFECTPRESUPPOSESTHATTHEREISNOREALDIFFERENCEBETWEENTHESUPRAESSENTIALANDTHEONTICREGISTERSHESEESNOTHINGINTHECONTRASTBEYONDHYPERBOLE4HISIMPUTESTO0ROCLUSINTOOMANYPLACESWHATAMOUNTSTOANEMPTYVERBOSITYANDRENDERSTHEHENADOLOGYADOCTRINEWITHOUTSUBSTANCE

%$7!2$0"54,%2

!MONGTHECHARACTERISTICSATTRIBUTEDTOBEINGSINTHEPASSAGECITEDABOVETHEONESTHATSTANDOUTESPECIALLYARESAMENESSTAUTOTTAUTOTTAUTOT SS DIFFERENCESDIFFERENCES HETEROTHETEROTHETEROT SS SSANDPARTICIPATIONINONEANOTHERMETHEXIS4HESEARETHEMOSTFREQUENTLYMETHEXIS4HESEARETHEMOSTFREQUENTLYMETHEXISREPEATEDCHARACTERISTICSANDALSOTHOSEWITHTHECLEARESTSYSTEMATICFUNCTIONSIN0ROCLUSTHOUGHT0ROCLUSREMARKSHEREWHEREHECONTRASTSTHEALLINALLOFTHEHENADSTOTHEPARTICIPATIONINEACHOTHEROFTHEFORMSSHOULDBESEENINTHELIGHTOFHISREJECTIONELSEWHEREOFHENADSPARTICIPATINGALTOGETHERTHATISNOTJUSTINEACHOTHERBUTINANYTHING0ROCLUSSTATESINTHEANYTHING0ROCLUSSTATESINTHEANYTHING %LEMENTSOF4HEOLOGYFORINSTANCETHATTHE'ODShHAVENOATTRIBUTEBYPARTICIPATIONBUTALLACCORDINGTOEXISTENCE;HUPARXIS=ORIMPLICITINTHEIRCAUSALITY;HUPARXIS=ORIMPLICITINTHEIRCAUSALITY;HUPARXIS KATAITIAN=vPROPANDINHIS4IMAEUSCOMMENTARYTHAThEVERY'ODISESSENTIALIZED4IMAEUSCOMMENTARYTHAThEVERY'ODISESSENTIALIZED4IMAEUS;OUSITAI=INBEINGA'ODORRATHERISSUPRAESSENTIALIZED;TAI=INBEINGA'ODORRATHERISSUPRAESSENTIALIZED;TAI HUPEROUSITAI=BUTTAI=BUTTAITHEREISNOTHINGWHICHISPARTICIPATEDBYHIMBECAUSETHE'ODSARETHEMOSTANCIENTANDVENERABLEOFALLTHINGSv4HISPASSAGEISESPECIALLYSIGNIlCANTFORITEXPLICITLYSTATESTHATTHEFACTTHATTHE'ODSPOSSESSACOMMONCHARACTERISTICDOESNOTMEANTHATTHEYPARTICIPATEINSOMETHINGMAKINGACLEARBREAKWITHADOESNOTMEANTHATTHEYPARTICIPATEINSOMETHINGMAKINGACLEARBREAKWITHADOESNOTMEANTHATTHEYPARTICIPATEINSOMETHINGBASICAXIOMOF0LATONICONTOLOGYNAMELYTHATCOMMONCHARACTERISTICSBELONGINGTOCOORDINATEENTITIESARETOBEEXPLAINEDBYREFERENCETOTHEIRCOMMONPARTICIPATIONINSOMESINGLEPRINCIPLEOFAHIGHERORDEROFBEINGTHANTHEY )N0ROCLUSPARTICIPATIONASSUCHTENDSTOBESUPERSEDEDBYAMORE

GENERALRELATIONSHIPTHATBETWEENAMANIFOLDPLGENERALRELATIONSHIPTHATBETWEENAMANIFOLDPLGENERALRELATIONSHIPTHATBETWEENAMANIFOLD PLPL THOSORCLASSTHOSORCLASSTHOS TAXISANDITSTAXISANDITSTAXISPRINCIPLEORMONADWITHITSCOMPLEMENTARYCONCEPTSOFPROCESSIONFROMPROPRO DOSDOS ANDREVERSIONUPONDOSANDREVERSIONUPONDOS EPISTROPHTHEPRINCIPLE4HEBASICCONCEPTSTHEPRINCIPLE4HEBASICCONCEPTSARELAIDOUTINPROPOFTHE%LEMENTSWHICHSTATESTHAThEVERYCLASSORIGINATESFROMAMONADANDPROCEEDSTOACOORDINATE;SUSTOICHON=MANIFOLDANDTHEMANIFOLDOFANYCLASSISCARRIEDBACKTOONEMONADv)NTHEBODYOFTHEPROPOSITIONWEREADTHAT

4HE%LEMENTSOF4HEOLOGYEDANDTRANS%2$ODDSNDED/XFORD#LARENDON0RESS;HENCEFORTHCITEDBYPROPTRANSLATIONSOCCASIONALLYMODIlED=$ODDSATTEMPTSTOBLUNTTHEIMPACTOFTHESTATEMENTINPROPTHATTHE'ODShHAVENOATTRIBUTEBYPARTICIPATIONvBYMAKINGTHISANINSTANCEOFhCHARACTERSDERIVEDTRANSVERSELYFROMTHEMONADBYITSCOORDINATEMETECHOMENAvANDTRACESTHISDOCTRINETOPROP"UTTHELATTERPROPOSITIONMERELYREFERSTOTWODIFFERENTKINDSOFPARTICIPATIONONEhPRIMITIVEvANDONEhTRANSIENTvANDNEVERIMPLIESTHATTHEFORMERMIGHTBEREGARDEDASNOPARTICIPATIONATALL$ODDSWISHESTOPRESERVEANACCOUNTOFTHERELATIONBETWEENTHE/NEANDTHEHENADSWHICHWOULDBEhEXACTLYPARALLELTOTHATWHICHSUBSISTSBETWEENINTELLIGENCESANDTHE)NTELLIGENCEORBETWEENSOULSANDTHE3OULvBUTDOESNOTJUSTIFYWHYTHECASESSHOULDBEPARALLELORWHYTHEPARALLELSHOULDBEhEXACTvRATHERTHANHOLDINGINSOMERESPECTSANDNOTINOTHERS4HE/NEAFTERALLISOFANATUREFUNDAMENTALLYDIFFERENTFROMTHEONTICHYPOSTASES)N0LATONIS4IMAEUM#OMMENTARIAVOLSED%$IEHL,EIPZIG4EUBNERn

REPRINT!MSTERDAM(AKKERT;HENCEFORTH)4TRANSLATIONSMINE=))4TRANSLATIONSMINE=))4

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

SINCExINEVERYCLASSTHEREISSOMECOMMONELEMENTACONTINUITYANDIDENTITYINVIRTUEOFWHICHSOMETHINGSARESAIDTOBECOORDINATE;HOMOTAGHOMOTAGHOMOTAG =ANDOTHERSNOT;HETEROTAGHETEROTAGHETEROTAG =IT IS APPARENT THAT THE IDENTICAL ELEMENT ISDERIVEDBY THEWHOLECLASS FROMA SINGLEPRINCIPLE4HUSINEACHCLASSORCAUSALCHAINTHEREEXISTSASINGLEMONADPRIORTOTHEMANIFOLDWHICHDETERMINESFORTHEMEMBERSOFTHECLASSTHEIRUNIQUERELATION;HENALOGON=TOONEANOTHERANDTOTHEWHOLE

.OTICETHATTHERELATIONSHIPOFMEMBERSOFSUCHANORDERTOONEANOTHERANDTOTHEWHOLEISMEDIATEDBYTHEMONADTHEMONADBEINGEQUIVALENTTOMEDIATEDBYTHEMONADTHEMONADBEINGEQUIVALENTTOMEDIATEDACOMMONLOGOSUNITINGTHEMEMBERSOFTHEORDER4HISPRINCIPLEOFMEDIALOGOSUNITINGTHEMEMBERSOFTHEORDER4HISPRINCIPLEOFMEDIALOGOSTIONWHEREBEINGSRELATETOEACHOTHERINDIRECTLYTHROUGHASUPERIORPRINCIPLECANBEGENERALIZEDTOTHEWHOLEOF"EING)NTHE0ARMENIDESCOMMENTARYWE0ARMENIDESCOMMENTARYWE0ARMENIDESREADTHATJUSTAShTHEREMUSTEXISTxPRIORTOALLBEINGSTHE-ONADOF"EINGTHROUGHWHICHALLBEINGSQUABEINGSAREORDEREDWITHRESPECTTOONEANOTHERvQUABEINGSAREORDEREDWITHRESPECTTOONEANOTHERvQUASOhWESEEKTOKNOWOFTHEMINSOFARASTHEYAREBEINGSWHATSORTOFMONADTHEYHAVEWHICHEMBRACESANDUNIlESTHEMv!NDAGAINhALLBEINGSAREACTUALLYFROMASINGLEMONADWHICHISANDISCALLEDPRIMARILY"EINGBYWHICHTHEYAREANDARENAMEDBEINGSACCORDINGTOTHEIRRESPECTIVECLASSES;TAXIN=ANDFROMTHISMONADALLBEINGSARESYMPATHETICWITHONEANOTHERANDAREINASENSEIDENTICALASBEINGFROMTHE/NE"EINGvINDEEDhALLTHINGSINSOFARASTHEYPARTICIPATEINTHE/NE"EINGAREINASENSETHESAMEASONEANOTHERANDONEv/NTOLOGYTHEREFOREISMONADOLOGY4HEAPPLICATIONOFTHECONCEPTOFTHEMONADEXTENDSFROMTHEHIGHESTHYPOSTASESTOTHEINDIVIDUALSUNDERINlMASPECIES#OMMONTOTHESEVARIOUSUSAGESOF@MONADISTHEIDEAOFSOMECOMMONLOGOSINAMANIFOLDWITHTHEDEGREETOWHICHWEAREENTITLEDLOGOSINAMANIFOLDWITHTHEDEGREETOWHICHWEAREENTITLEDLOGOSTOHYPOSTATIZETHATLOGOSBEINGVARIABLEFORTHEMONADITSELFCARRIESONLYALOGOSBEINGVARIABLEFORTHEMONADITSELFCARRIESONLYALOGOSMINIMUMOFONTOLOGICALCOMMITMENT4HEMONADEXPRESSESFORMALUNITY&ORMALUNITYDETERMINESABEINGASSOMEKINDOFBEINGWHILEATTHESAMETIMEAFlRMINGTHEUNITYOFBEINGSWITHTHEWHOLEOF"EINGTHEIRIDENTITYINANDWITH"EINGTHROUGHTHEVERYNATUREOFFORM!SSUCHTHEFORMALUNITYPOSSESSEDBYBEINGSUNDERCUTSTHEIRUNITY INTHESENSEOF INDIVIDUALITYORUNIQUENESSONACCOUNTOFTHEHOLISTICSYSTEMINTOWHICHTHEYAREFOLDEDBYTHEVERYSTRUCTURESFROMWHICHTHEYDERIVEDETERMINACY7EREADINPROPTHAThEVERYBEINGISRELATEDTOEVERYOTHEREITHERASAWHOLEORASAPARTORBYSAMENESSORBYDIFFERENCEv7ECANSEETHISASANAXIOMOFTHEUNIVERSALITYOFMEDIATIONWITHRESPECTTOBEINGSTHEPARTMEDIATEDBYTHEWHOLEIDENTICAL

)0F)0F)04HEMOSTSPECIlC)DEASARETHOSEhTHATAREPARTICIPATEDBYINDIVIDUALSSUCHAS-AN

$OGANDOTHERSOFTHESORT4HEIR@MAKINGSHAVEASTHEIRIMMEDIATERESULTTHEGENERATIONOFINDIVIDUALUNITIES ;TAS EN TOISATOMOISMONADAS=-ANOF INDIVIDUALMEN$OGOFPARTICULARTAS EN TOISATOMOISMONADAS=-ANOF INDIVIDUALMEN$OGOFPARTICULARTAS EN TOISATOMOISMONADASDOGSAND(ORSEANDEACHOFTHERESTINLIKEMANNERv)03IMILARLYAT)03IMILARLYAT)0 )0hMONADvIS)0hMONADvIS)0USEDTOREFERTOhTHEMANYSEPARATEINDIVIDUALSvUNDERSOME)DEAEGhTHEINlNITYOFEXISTINGMENvUNDERTHE)DEAOF-AN

%$7!2$0"54,%2

THINGSMEDIATEDBYTHATQUALITYWITHRESPECTTOWHICHTHETWOAREIDENTICALORWITHRESPECTTOWHICHONETHINGISSELFIDENTICALDIFFERENTTHINGSMEDIATEDLIKEWISEBYTHATQUALITYINRESPECTTOWHICHTHEYDIFFERANDlNALLYTHEWHOLEITSELFMEDIATEDBYTHEPARTS4HE'ODSHOWEVERAREEXPLICITLYNONRELATIONAL4HE%LEMENTSSTATESTHAT%LEMENTSSTATESTHAT%LEMENTS

THEHENADSTRANSCENDRELATIONONACCOUNTOFTHEIRhPURITYvAMIGAMIGAMIG SS SS WHICHDERIVESFROMTHEhSIMPLICITYvANDhSELFSUFlCIENCYvOFTHE'ODS$EITIESAREhPERFECTLYUNITARYvHENIAIOSANDASSUCHAREhWHOLLYSELFSUFlCIENTxPERFECTSIMPLICITYISTHECHARACTEROFDEITY"EINGAPUREEXCELLENCEDEITYNEEDSNOTHINGEXTRANEOUSBEINGUNITARYITISNOTDEPENDENTUPONITSOWNELEMENTSv4HEQUALITYOFBEINGUNITARYTHENISAMATTEROFTHEINTEGRITYANDAUTONOMYOFANINDIVIDUAL(ENIAIOS ISTHETECHNICALTERMIN0ROCLUSFORTHETYPEOF(ENIAIOS ISTHETECHNICALTERMIN0ROCLUSFORTHETYPEOF(ENIAIOSUNITYPOSSESSEDBYSUPRAESSENTIALSCONTRASTINGWITHTHETERMHNMENOSOR@UNIlEDWHICHAPPLIESSTRICTLYTOBEINGS0RIORTO0ROCLUSTHETERMHENIAIOSUSUALLYSIMPLYCHARACTERIZESAUNIFYINGAGENT.OTABLYHOWEVERTHETERMHENIAIOSISUSEDINTHEPLURALBY)AMBLICHUSHENIAIOSISUSEDINTHEPLURALBY)AMBLICHUSHENIAIOS TOEXPLAINTHATANYMULTIPLICITYBROUGHTTOGETHERACCORDINGTOSUMMATIONSREIAORHERDINGTOGETHERSUNAGELASMOSCANBEDISCRIMINATEDSUNAGELASMOSCANBEDISCRIMINATEDSUNAGELASMOS DIAKRINAI INTOHENIAIA(ENIAIAARETHUS(ENIAIAARETHUS(ENIAIAINTEGRALINDIVIDUALSWHOSEASSEMBLAGEINTOACOMMONBODYISADVENTITIOUSINRELATIONTOTHEIROWNINDIVIDUALITY%NTITIESDETERMINEDBYTHEIRRELATIONSONTHEOTHERHANDLOSETHEIRAUTONOMYTOTHEDEGREETHATTHOSERELATIONSCOMETOBEOBJECTIVE&OR INSTANCE hEVERY'ODv0ROCLUSEXPLAINS IN THE%LEMENTS hIS ABOVE

"EINGABOVE,IFEANDABOVE)NTELLECTvTHETHREEMAJORONTICHYPOSTASESINASMUCH AS hTHESE THREE THOUGHMUTUALLY DISTINCT ARE EACH IMPLICIT INTHEOTHERTWOv(EREAGAINWESEETHEUBIQUITYOFHOLISMANDMEDIATIONAMONGBEINGS AND THAT THIS IS IN SOMEWAY THEVERY THINGWHICHMAKES'ODSPROFOUNDLYDIFFERENTFROMBEINGS4HISCOMESUPAGAININADISCUSSIONCONTRASTINGTHESTATUSOFRELATIONSINTHEONTICANDSUPRAESSENTIALREALMSIN

%VENTHEhWHOLEBEFORETHEPARTSvPROPTHATIShTHEWHOLEINITSCAUSEvORhTHEFORMOFEACHTHINGxPREEXISTINGINTHECAUSEvISSTILLhAWHOLEOFPARTSvALBEITPRIORTOTHEMPROP0ROP0ROPh5NITARY,OGOSvISFOR!RISTIDES1UINTILIANUS$E-USICA)ANEPITHETOFTHEDEMI$E-USICA)ANEPITHETOFTHEDEMI$E-USICA

URGEWHEREhUNITARYvISGLOSSEDAShMAKINGTHEMANYANDDIVERSEBEINGSTORESTBYINDISSOLUBLEBONDSINONECOMPREHENSIONvSIMILARLY)AMBLICHUS$E-YST6)))WHICHREPORTSANOSTENSIBLY%GYPTIANDOCTRINERESPECTINGAhSUPREMEUNITARYCAUSEOFALLTHINGSvWHICHhMASTERSvTHEhINDETERMINATENATUREvTTT SAORISTOUPHUSESAORISTOUPHUSE SS ASORINCONJUNCTIONWITHhACERTAINDETERMINATESASORINCONJUNCTIONWITHhACERTAINDETERMINATESMEASUREvTINOSHRISMENOUMETROU)N.IC!RITHM0ROP

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

THE0ARMENIDESCOMMENTARY0ARMENIDESCOMMENTARY0ARMENIDES 4HISDISCUSSIONTURNSONTHEUSEOFTHETERMShFOR ITSELF v AND hFOR ANOTHERv4HE INTELLIGIBLEHE EXPLAINS IS hFOR ITSELF vANDTHE)NTELLECTIShFORITSELFvBUThTHROUGHTHISVERYRELATIONTHE)NTELLECTISUNITEDWITHTHEINTELLIGIBLEANDTHEINTELLIGIBLEWITHTHE)NTELLECTANDTHE)NTELLECTANDTHEINTELLIGIBLEAREONETHINGv4HEVERYhFORITSELFvTHENOFONTICHYPOSTASESLIKE)NTELLECTAND"EINGSERVESULTIMATELYTOUNITETHEMUNITETHEMUNITESINCEINTHEIRVERYNATURETHEYCOPOSITEACHOTHER4HEYAREWEMIGHTSAYDIACRITICALLYDETERMINED0ROCLUSGOESONHOWEVERTOSPEAKOFAHIGHERDEGREEDIACRITICALLYDETERMINED0ROCLUSGOESONHOWEVERTOSPEAKOFAHIGHERDEGREEDIACRITICALLYDETERMINEDOFEXISTENCEhFORITSELFvWHICHISPRESENTAMONGTHE'ODS(EUSESASANEXAMPLETHERELATIONSHIPOFBEINGAFATHERAMONGBEINGSAFATHERSINCEHEPOSSESSESTHEESSENTIALLYRELATIONALATTRIBUTEOFFATHERISTHEREFOREPURELYhFORANOTHERvBUTAMONGTHE'ODSBYCONTRASTAhPATERNALCAUSEvISlRSThFORITSELFvASINDEEDIShANYOFFSPRINGv0ROCLUSSTATESTHATWHENCONCEIVINGTHE'ODSWEMUSTPLACEPRIORhEVENTOxSELFIDENTITYTHEEXISTENCE;HUPARXIN=OFEACHINITSELFFOREACHEXISTSPRIMARILY@FORITSELFANDINITSELFISUNITEDTOTHERESTx3UCHANENTITYxTHENISNONRELATIONALTHOUGHPRODUCTIVEOFARELATIONv0ROCLUSREPEATSTHESAMEDOCTRINELATEREXPLAININGTHAThTHEPATERNALANDMATERNALFACULTIESvAREPRESENTAMONGTHE'ODSNOTAShMERERELATIONSHIPSvBUTRATHERAShGENERATIVEPOWERSv4HE'ODSHAVERELATIONSHIPSAMONGEACHOTHERBUTUNLIKEBEINGSA'ODIShFORITSELF v;SIC=PRIORTOTHESESIC=PRIORTOTHESESICRELATIONSHIPSWHICHAREPRESENTINCIPIENTLYASTHATDEITYShPOWERSv0ROCLUSCONTRASTSTHEPOWERSOFTHE'ODSANDTHEIRHUPARXEISORhEXISTENCESv (UPARXISWHICHWEHAVEALREADYENCOUNTEREDEGINTHEDISCUSSIONOF%4PROP%4PROP%4ISATECHNICALTERMESTABLISHINGTHEHENADSASPRIORTO"EING)TSELFANDTOTHEOPPOSITIONOF"EINGAND.ON"EING0RIORTOTHEGENERALOPPOSITIONOFHUPARXISTO"EINGHOWEVERISTHEOPPOSITIONBETWEENCONSIDERINGTHE'ODSHUPARXISTO"EINGHOWEVERISTHEOPPOSITIONBETWEENCONSIDERINGTHE'ODSHUPARXISWITHRESPECTTOTHEIRHUPARXEISANDWITHRESPECTTOTHEIRHUPARXEISANDWITHRESPECTTOTHEIRHUPARXEIS DUNAMEIS!T)0)0)0FORINSTANCEINTELLECTUALSHAPEShAREKNOWABLEANDEXPRESSIBLEASPERTAININGTOTHEPOWERSOFTHE'ODSNOTTOTHEIREXISTENCES;TAISHUPARXESINAUTAIS=INTAISHUPARXESINAUTAIS=INTAISHUPARXESINAUTAISVIRTUEOFWHICHTHEYPOSSESSTHECHARACTERISTICOFBEING'ODSv4HEhPOWERSvOFTHE'ODSAREALSOMENTIONEDINTHEFOLLOWINGPASSAGEFROMTHE0LATONIC4HEOLOGYh7EMUSTNEVERTHINKTHEREFORETHATALLPOWERISTHEPROGENYOFESSENCE&ORTHEPOWERSOFTHE'ODSARESUPRAESSENTIALANDARECONSUBSISTENTWITHTHEHENADSTHEMSELVESOFTHE'ODS!NDTHROUGHTHISPOWERTHE'ODSAREGENERATIVEOFBEINGSv4HEhPOWERSvOF THE'ODS ARE LIKE THE'ODS

)0)0)0)0)0)0%GAT)0)0)0&OR THEHISTORYOF THE TERMHUPARXIS IN.EOPLATONISM SEEHUPARXIS IN.EOPLATONISM SEEHUPARXIS (YPARXIS E(YPOSTASISNEL

.EOPLATONISMOED&2OMANOAND$04AORMINA&IRENZE,EO3/LSCHKI%DITORE04)))n04)))n04

%$7!2$0"54,%2

THEMSELVESSUPRAESSENTIALBUTITISTHROUGHTHEIRPOWERSTHATTHE'ODSAREhGENERATIVEOFBEINGSv4HEOPPOSITIONBETWEENHUPARXISANDHUPARXISANDHUPARXIS DUNAMISISTHUSDUNAMISISTHUSDUNAMISTHELOCUSFORTHEOPPOSITIONBETWEENTHESUPRAESSENTIALANDONTICDOMAINS&ORNOTONLYARETHE'ODSGENERATIVEOFBEINGSTHROUGHTHEIRPOWERSBUTITISBYVIRTUEOFTHEIRPOWERSTHATTHEYTHEMSELVESCANBEGRASPEDLIKEBEINGSANDTREATEDONTOLOGICALLYGROUPEDINTOFUNCTIONALCLASSESFORINSTANCE4HENOTIONOFRELATIONSASSOMEHOWEMERGENTFROMTHENONRELATIONAL

STATEOFTHEHENADSCOMESUPINTHE0ARMENIDESCOMMENTARYWHEN0ROCLUS0ARMENIDESCOMMENTARYWHEN0ROCLUS0ARMENIDESCONSIDERS THE APPLICABILITYOF THENOTIONOFDIFFERENCE TO THE RELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHE/NEANDTHE-ANYPOLLABETWEENTHE/NEANDTHE-ANYPOLLABETWEENTHE/NEANDTHE-ANY THECONTEXTBEINGTHEAFlRMATIONAT0ARMETHAThTHE/NECANNOTBEOTHERTHANORTHESAMEASEITHERITSELFORANOTHERvTHATISTHENEGATIONOFIDENTITYANDDIFFERENCEWITHRESPECTTOTHE/NE0ROCLUSEXPLAINS THATDESPITE THEIR TRANSCENDENCEOFDIFFERENCEHETEROTHETEROTHETEROT SS ASSUCHTHEREISSTILLDIFFERENTIATIONAMONGTHE'ODSSASSUCHTHEREISSTILLDIFFERENTIATIONAMONGTHE'ODSS

4HE-ANYQUADIFFERENTARENECESSARILYALSOINALLWAYS@OTHER;QUADIFFERENTARENECESSARILYALSOINALLWAYS@OTHER;QUA ALLA=BUTARENOTDIFFERENTTHANTHE/NE&ORASHEHIMSELFHASDECLAREDWHATIS@DIFFERENT;HETERON=ISDIFFERENTTHANANOTHERANDSOEVENIFTHEYSHOULDBECALLED@OTHERS;ALLA=ANDDIFFERENTTHANTHE/NEONEWOULDNOTSAYITINTHESENSETHATTHEYHAVEMADEAPROCESSIONFROMITBYMEANSOF$IFFERENCExLETUSGRANTTHATTHEREISADECLINATION;HUPHESIS=FROMTHE/NETOTHESEHUPHESIS=FROMTHE/NETOTHESEHUPHESISBUTNOTEVERYDECLINATIONISTHEPRODUCTOF$IFFERENCEBUTONLYTHATDECLINATIONWHICHISINTHEREALMOFTHEFORMS

0ROCLUSGOESONTOEXPLAINTHAThTHEOTHERSTHANTHE/NEvWILLBECALLEDhDIFFERENTTHANTHE/NEINSOFARASBYBECOMINGOTHERTHANEACH OTHERTHEYARESEPARATEDFROMTHE/NEWHICHABSOLUTELYREJECTSTHETITLEOFRECIPROCALOTHERNESS;TTT NALLNALLNALL LL LL NPROSGORIANGORIAN =v!NDSOhINTHESUPRAESSENTIALREALMvTHATISTHEREALMOFTHEHENADShINSTEADOFTHEDIFFERENCEOFSUPERIORFORMSFROMINFERIORWEMUSTPOSTULATETRANSCENDENCE;HUPEROCHN= INSTEADOFTHATOFINFERIORFROMSUPERIORDECLINATION;HUPHESIN=ANDINPLACEOFTHEDISTINCTION;DIAKRISESS =OFCOORDINATES;S=OFCOORDINATES;S HOMOSTOICHN=FROMEACHOTHERINDIVIDUALPECULIARITY;IDIOTIDIOTIDIOT TA=v4HEh-ANYvOFTHEPRESENTPASSAGEARETHUSEVIDENTLYTHEHENADSWHOSEINDIVIDUALITYNOTETHEUSEOFIDIOTIDIOTIDIOT SS WHICHWASINTRODUCEDASATECHNICALTERMIN)0ISCONTRASTEDWITHTHEhRECIPROCALOTHERNESSvOF)0ISCONTRASTEDWITHTHEhRECIPROCALOTHERNESSvOF)0THEFORMShTHEDISTINCTIONOFCOORDINATESFROMEACHOTHERvTHATISTHEOTHERTHANNESSORDETERMINATEDIFFERENCEOFBEINGSTHATARECOORDINATEIECANBEASSIGNEDTOACOMMONORDERORREDUCEDTOCOMMONhELEMENTSvSTOICHEIA4HE-ANYTHATISTHEHENADSAREhOTHERvALLOSINRELATIONTOTHE/NEALLOSINRELATIONTOTHE/NEALLOS

BUTNOTDIFFERENTHETEROSTHANTHE/NE4HISWOULDSEEMTOBENONSENSEIFHETEROSTHANTHE/NE4HISWOULDSEEMTOBENONSENSEIFHETEROSITWERENOTFORTHEEXPLANATIONTHATWHATCOMESTOBEOTHERTHANORDIFFERENT

4HISNEGATIONCORRESPONDSPOSITIVELYTOTHETHIRDORDEROFTHEINTELLECTUAL'ODS)0)0)0

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

FROMTHE/NEDOESSOTHROUGHCOMINGTOBEOTHERTHANITSCOORDINATES4HATISWHENDETERMINATERELATIONAMONGSTCOORDINATEENTITIESARISESSOTOODOESADETERMINATERELATIONSHIPARISEBETWEENTHEMANDTHEIRPRINCIPLEULTIMATELYTHE/NE4HEDIFFERENTPOSITIONRELATIVETOTHE/NEOFTHEHENADSANDTHEFORMSISTHEREFOREAMATTEROFTHEEMERGENCEWITHTHEFORMSOFMEDIATINGRELATIONSHIPSNAMELYTHEONTICRELATIONSOFWHOLEANDPARTIDENTITYANDDIFFERENCE3IMULTANEOUSLYTOTHESEARELATIONSHIPEMERGESBETWEENTHEFORMSANDTHE/NEWHERENORELATIONSHIPSEEMSTOEXISTBETWEENTHE/NEANDTHEHENADS4HETERMALLOSREFERSTOTHISLOOSERGENERIChDIFFERENTIATIONvALLOSREFERSTOTHISLOOSERGENERIChDIFFERENTIATIONvALLOS.OTE THATWHEREAS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE FORMS OF RECIPRO

CALOTHERNESSOR THEDISTINCTIONOFCOORDINATES0ROCLUSSIMPLYSUBSTITUTESTHEIDIOTIDIOTIDIOT SS THEINDIVIDUALPECULIARITYOFTHEHENADSHESUBSTITUTESFORTHESINGLEVERTICALRELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHESUPERIORANDTHEINFERIORAMONGTHESINGLEVERTICALRELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHESUPERIORANDTHEINFERIORAMONGTHESINGLEFORMSTHETWOCOMPLEMENTARYNOTIONSOFTRANSCENDENCEANDDECLINATIONINTHESUPRAESSENTIALS4HESENOTIONSARENOTIMPORTANTINTHEMSELVES7HATMATTERSRATHERISTHESTRATEGYOFBREAKINGUPTHESINGLERELATIONINTOTWOBECAUSEOFTHEWAYITFORECLOSESMEDIATION2ATHERTHANASINGLESUBSTANTIALRELATIONMEDIATINGTWOHENADSANDHENCEUNITINGTHEMINSOMETHIRDTHEANDHENCEUNITINGTHEMINSOMETHIRDTHEANDHENCEUNITINGTHEMINSOMETHIRDRELATIONSHIPEXISTSASAPOTENTIALINEACHOFTHEMEMBERS4HISPOTENTIALISACTUALIZEDANDBECOMESASUBSTANTIALRELATIONSHIPATHIRDWHENTHEHYPOSTASISBECOMESASUBSTANTIALRELATIONSHIPATHIRDWHENTHEHYPOSTASISBECOMESOFINTELLECTISFULLYCONSTITUTEDANDTHENECESSARYSTRUCTURESOFIDENTITYANDDIFFERENCEHAVEBEENCONSTITUTEDBYDIVINEACTIVITY4HESPECIALIMPORTANCEOF THE HIERARCHICAL RELATIONSHIP THE REASONWHY IT IS SINGLED OUT HERE ISBECAUSEWERETHERELATIONSOFSUBORDINATIONBETWEENMOREhUNIVERSALvANDMOREhSPECIlCvHENADSTOBEGRANTEDTHESTATUSSUCHRELATIONSPOSSESSAMONGFORMSTHENTHEMOREhUNIVERSALvHENADSWOULDBEMOREHENADICTHANTHEMOREHENADICTHANTHEMOREMOREhSPECIlCvONES"UTTHEREARENOTDEGREESAMONGTHE'ODS0ROCLUSISQUITECLEARTHATEVENANINFRAINTELLECTUAL'ODISSTILLALTOGETHERAHENADANDSUPRAESSENTIAL(EREWESEETHEFORMALSTRUCTUREDISTINGUISHINGONTICMULTIPLICITIESFROM

THEMANIFOLDOFTHEHENADS#OORDINATETERMSTERMSSUBSUMEDUNDERASINGLECLASSAREOTHERTHANONEANOTHERTHATISTHEYARERECIPROCALLYORDIACRITICALLYDISTINGUISHEDWHICHIMPLIESMEDIATION4HE'ODSTRANSCENDRELATIONANDMEDIATION"UTHOWCANTHISBEIFTHEYARESUBJECTTOTHERULESGOVERNINGTHERELATIONSHIPSBETWEENMONADSANDTHEIRMANIFOLDSINPROP4HEQUESTIONISINWHATSENSEDOTHEHENADSPROCEEDFROMTHE/NEATALL

4HEASSIMILATIVE'ODS CONSTITUTIVEOF THE FORMOF,IKENESS THAT ISOFASSIMILATINGPARTICIPANTSTOTHEFORMSTHEYPARTICIPATEAREhACCORDINGTOTHEIRHYPARXEISBEYONDESSENCEANDMULTIPLICITYBUTACCORDINGTOTHEPARTICIPATIONSOFTHEMWHICHRECEIVETHEILLUMINATIONOFAPROCESSIONOFTHISKINDTHEYARECALLEDASSIMILATIVEv046)n046)n04

%$7!2$0"54,%2

!CCORDINGTOTHE&IRST(YPOTHESISOF THE0ARMENIDES THE/NENEITHERISNORISONEAND0ROCLUSFURTHERSPECIlESTHATTHE/NEISNEITHERACAUSENORAPRODUCERTHEVARIOUSMODESOFCAUSALITYTHEhABOUTWHICHvTHEhONACCOUNTOFWHICHvANDTHEhFROMWHICHvAREALLSAIDBYHIMTOSUBSISTINANDTHROUGHTHEINTELLIGIBLEORDEROF'ODS)NACCORDWITHTHIS&RANCESCO2OMANOHASNOTEDAPROPENSITYTHROUGHOUT0ROCLUSWORKTOUSETHETERMAITIA INREFERENCETOTHE/NEASOPPOSEDTOAITIA INREFERENCETOTHE/NEASOPPOSEDTOAITIA AITIONSEEMINGLYINORDERTOAVOID THEHYPOSTATIZING CONNOTATIONS OF TO AITION4HIS USAGE IS ALREADYEVIDENTINTHE%LEMENTSANDSOWESHOULDNOTACCORDMOREWEIGHTTHANISMERITEDTOTHEEXTENSIONTHEREOFTHESTRUCTUREOFMONADANDMANIFOLDTOTHE/NEANDTHEHENADS)NDEEDACCORDINGTOPROPAMONADISSIMPLYTHATWHICHhHASTHERELATIVESTATUSOFAPRINCIPLE;ARCHSECHOUSALOGONSECHOUSALOGON =v)NTURNANUNPARTICIPATEDPRINCIPLEhHASTHERELATIVESTATUSOFAMONAD;MONADOSECHONLOGON=vPROP4HEKEYTHENISTOUNDERSTANDWHICHASPECTSOFhMONADICITYvAREAPPROPRIATETOTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHE/NEANDTHEHENADSANDWHICHARENOT&URTHERMORETHEREISNOhDECLINEvFROMTHE/NETOTHEHENADS)NTHE

0LATONIC4HEOLOGY0ROCLUSSAYSTHAThIFTHE'OODISMULTIPLIEDTHROUGHWEAKNESSTHEWHOLEOFTHINGSWILLPROCEEDTHROUGHADIMINUTION;HUPHESIN=RATHERTHANTHROUGHASUPERABUNDANCEOFGOODNESSv)NTHEPASSAGECITEDABOVEFROMTHE0ARMENIDESCOMMENTARY0ARMENIDESCOMMENTARY0ARMENIDES )00ROCLUSCONTRASTEDTHEMODE)00ROCLUSCONTRASTEDTHEMODE)0OFPROCESSIONOFTHEHENADSFROMTHE/NETOTHEhPROCESSIONBYDIFFERENCEvOFTHEFORMS!TANOTHERPOINT)00ROCLUSSPEAKSOFDIFFERENTMODES)00ROCLUSSPEAKSOFDIFFERENTMODES)0OFPROCESSIONCONTRASTINGTHAThBYWAYOFUNITY;HENSINSIN =vANDTHAThBYWAYOFIDENTITY;TAUTOTTAUTOTTAUTOT TA=v0ROCESSIONBYWAYOFUNITYBELONGSTOTHEHENADShFORTHEREISNOIDENTITYAMONGTHEMNORSPECIlCLIKENESSBUTUNITYONLYvWHILEPROCESSIONBYWAYOFIDENTITYBELONGSTOhTHEINDIVISIBLESUBSTANCESWHERETHATWHICHPROCEEDSISSOMEHOWTHESAMEASWHATITCAMEFROMFORBEINGALLSAFEGUARDEDANDHELDTOGETHERBYETERNITYTHEYMANIFESTINASENSETHEIDENTITYOFPARTTOWHOLEv4HEhPROCESSIONBYIDENTITYvOFTHISPASSAGEISEVIDENTLYTHESAMEASTHEhPROCESSIONBYDIFFERENCEvOFSINCEIDENTITYANDDIFFERENCESHARETHESAMEFORMALSTRUCTURE"EINGSPROCEEDBYIDENTITYBECAUSETOBEISONSOMELEVELTOBEIDENTICALASAPARTOF"EINGWITHTHEBEISONSOMELEVELTOBEIDENTICALASAPARTOF"EINGWITHTHEBEWHOLEOF"EING!LLTHATISISTHESAMEAS"EINGBECAUSEEVERYBEINGISANDISONEAMONADOFSOMESORTANDANHNMENONAUNIlEDENTITYJUSTLIKE"EING)TSELF"EINGISONEANDMANYIDENTICALANDDIFFERENTLIKEALLTHEBEINGSTHEMSELVESFOR"EINGACCEPTSALLTHEDETERMINATIONSTHE/NEREJECTSINTHE04))nnn04))nnn04h,)DEDE#AUSALITDANSLA4HOLOGIE0LATONICIENNEOLOGIE0LATONICIENNE DE0ROCLUvINOLOGIE0LATONICIENNEDE0ROCLUvINOLOGIE0LATONICIENNE 0ROCLUSETLA4HOLOGIEOLOGIE

0LATONICIENNE!CTESDU#OLLOQUE)NTERNATIONALDE,OUVAINn-AIENLHONNEURDE($3AFFREYET,'7ESTERINKEDS!0H3EGONDS#-3TEEL04))n04))n04

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

&IRST(YPOTHESISOFTHE0ARMENIDES4HE HENADS ARE THE SOLE EXEMPLARS OF PROCESSION hBYWAY OF UNITYv

WHICHISDISCUSSEDAT04)))F!FTERHAVINGLAIDOUTALINEOFREASONING04)))F!FTERHAVINGLAIDOUTALINEOFREASONING04ESSENTIALLYTHESAMEASTHATOFPROPOFTHE%LEMENTSNAMELYTHAThEVERYPRODUCINGCAUSEBRINGSINTOEXISTENCETHINGSLIKETOITSELFBEFORETHEUNLIKEvHECONCLUDESTHATIFEVERYOTHERCAUSECONSTITUTESAPROGENYSIMILARTOITSELFPRIORTOTHATWHICHISDISSIMILARMUCHMOREMUSTTHE/NEREVEALAFTERTHISMANNER THINGSPOSTERIOR TO ITSELF SINCE IT ISBEYOND LIKENESS SO THE/NE)TSELFMUSTPRODUCEACCORDINGTOUNITYUNITYUNITY KATHENSINSIN THINGSWHICHPRIMARILYPROCEEDFROMIT4HE/NEISTHUSSAIDTOPRODUCETHEhUNITARYMANIFOLDvPL4HE/NEISTHUSSAIDTOPRODUCETHEhUNITARYMANIFOLDvPL4HE/NEISTHUSSAIDTOPRODUCETHEhUNITARYMANIFOLDv PLPL THOSHENIAION

OFTHEHENADShUNITARILYvHENIAISS 4HISMANIFOLDCONSISTSOFhSELFPERFECTS4HISMANIFOLDCONSISTSOFhSELFPERFECTS;AUTOTELEIS=HENADSMOSTCOGNATETOTHEIRPRODUCER;AUTOTELEIS=HENADSMOSTCOGNATETOTHEIRPRODUCER;AUTOTELEIS TTT PARAGONTISUGGENESTERAS=vPARAGONTISUGGENESTERAS=vPARAGONTISUGGENESTERASANDIShCONNASCENT;SUMPHUOMENOS=WITHTHE/NEUNIFORM;SUMPHUOMENOS=WITHTHE/NEUNIFORM;SUMPHUOMENOS HENOEIDHENOEIDHENOEID SS =INEFS=INEFSFABLESUPRAESSENTIALANDPERFECTLYSIMILARTOITSCAUSEv4HISPERFECTSIMILARITYISSUCHTHATNOhINTRUSIONOFDIFFERENCESEPARATE;S=FROMTHEGENERATORTHETHINGSBEGOTTENANDTRANSFER;S=THEMINTOADIFFERENTCLASSv4HEhCAUSEOFALLTHINGSvWEREADhHASESTABLISHEDABOUTITSELFADIVINESETANDHASUNITEDITTOITSOWNSIMPLICITYv4OTHINKTHEHENADSASCAUSEDATALLTHENWEMUSTIMAGINETHEDIFFERENCE

BETWEENPRODUCERANDPRODUCTASAPPROACHINGZEROWITHNODIFFERENCETOSEPARATETHEMFROMTHEIRPRINCIPLE LESTTHEYLACKTHEVERYUNITYTHATISINDIVIDUALITYINTEGRITYANDSIMPLICITYEACHINITSELFEACHINITSELFEACHINITSEL THATISTHEVERYCHARFTHATISTHEVERYCHARFACTERISTICIMPARTEDTHEMBYTHE/NE4HEYWOULDFALLSHORTINTHEIRUNITYWERETHE/NETOBESETOVERANDABOVETHEM4HISISWHATMAKESTHESETORARITHMOSOFTHEHENADShINEFFABLEvTHECHARACTEROFINEFFABILITYREFERSTOTHEIMPOSSIBILITYOFDRAWINGTHEINFERENCESINRESPECTTOTHISSERIESWHICHWOULDAPPLYTOANYOTHERMANIFOLD&ROMADISCUSSIONINTHESECONDBOOKOFTHE0LATONIC4HEOLOGYWEMAYGAININSIGHTINTOHOWTHECAUSALECONOMYISSUBLATEDINTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHE/NEANDTHEHENADS

ITISNECESSARYTHATEVERYTHINGWHICHISPRODUCEDWITHREFERENCETOANDONACCOUNTOFIT;VIZhTHECAUSEOFALLBEINGSv=SHOULDHAVEACERTAINRELATION;SCHESIN=WITHITANDTHROUGHTHISALSOALIKENESSTOIT&OREVERYRELATIONOFONETHINGTOWARDSANOTHERISPREDICATEDINATWOFOLDRESPECTEITHERFROMBOTHPARTICIPATINGONETHINGWHICHAFFORDSTOTHEPARTICIPANTSACOMMUNIONWITHEACHOTHERORFROMONEOFTHEMPARTICIPATINGTHEOTHERx(ENCEITISNECESSARYxEITHERTHATTHERESHOULDBEACERTAINTHIRDTHINGTHECAUSEOFTHERELATIONORTHATTHEPRINCIPLESHOULDIMPARTTOTHENATURESPOSTERIORTOITSELFATENDENCYTOITSELFANDTHATDESIRETHROUGHWHICHEVERYTHINGISPRESERVEDANDEXISTS04))F 04))F 04

4HEREFERENCETOAhTHIRDTHINGvPUTSUSINMINDOFTHEPROBLEMATICOFTHEh4HIRD-ANv4OAVOIDANINlNITEREGRESSOFRELATIONSANDCAUSESOFRELATIONS

%$7!2$0"54,%2

THElRSTSERIESMUSTRELATETOITSCAUSETHROUGHADESIREWHICHDOESNOTCAUSEUSTOPOSITANYLIKENESSORRELATIONTOANYTHINGDIFFERENTBUTRATHERADESIREFORSELF4HISISEVIDENTSIMPLYFROMTHENATUREOFTHECHARACTERISTICIMPARTEDSELF4HISISEVIDENTSIMPLYFROMTHENATUREOFTHECHARACTERISTICIMPARTEDSELFBYTHE/NE4HE/NEORTHE'OODISSSTIKONHEKASTOUSTIKONHEKASTOU THATWHICHhCONSERVESANDHOLDSTOGETHERTHEBEINGOFEACHSEVERALTHINGv%4PROP$ESIRE%4PROP$ESIRE%4OFTHE/NETHEREFOREISDESIREASSELFPRODUCTIONINASMUCHASINDESIRINGTHE/NE'OODENTITIESDESIRETHEIRINDIVIDUALINTEGRITY)NTHE0ARMENIDESCOMMENTARY)0+0ROCLUSSPEAKSOFhANATURALSTRIVINGAFTERTHE/NEv)0+0ROCLUSSPEAKSOFhANATURALSTRIVINGAFTERTHE/NEv)0INEVERYTHINGh7HATELSEISTHE/NEINOURSELVESEXCEPTTHEOPERATIONANDENERGYOFTHISSTRIVING)TISTHEREFORETHISINTERIORUNDERSTANDINGOFUNITYWHICHISAPROJECTIONANDASITWEREANEXPRESSIONOFTHE/NEINOURSELVESTHATWECALL@THE/NEv!GAINhWESHOULDRATHERSAYTHATITISNOTTHE/NETHATWECALL@ONEWHENWEUSETHISNAMEBUTTHEUNDERSTANDINGOFUNITYWHICHISINOURSELVESvIBID4HISSTRIVINGISAPTLYREFERREDTOELSEWHEREBYHIM04))nASAhDESIREFORTHEUNKNOWABLENATUREANDTHESOURCEOFTHE'OODv$ESIREOFTHE/NEISDESIREASSELFPRODUCTION)NDESIRINGTHE/NEOR'OODENTITIESDESIRETHEIRINDIVIDUALINTEGRITY)FFORBEINGSTHEGUARANTOROFTHISINTEGRITYISTHEIRFORMTHENITISTHROUGHTHEMEDIATIONOFTHEFORMTHATTHEBEINGDESIRESITSELFANDCONSTITUTESITSELFTHROUGHREVERSIONUPONITSFORM4HISMEANSTHATFORBEINGSTHEDESIREFORSELFLEADSTOTHESUBLATIONOFTHESELFASNARROWLYCONCEIVED&ORANYBEINGQUABEINGREVERSIONUPONITSFORMQUABEINGREVERSIONUPONITSFORMQUAWILLDISCLOSETHATTHEGIVENBEINGISMEDIATEDBYTHEWHOLEOF"EING&ORTHEHENADHOWEVERTHEREISEXISTENTIALLYONLYITSELF&ORWEREADIN

THEh4EN$OUBTSvESSAYTHAT

;T=HE/NEANDTHE'OODEXISTSINTHREEWAYSACCORDINGTOCAUSEANDTHISISTHElRSTPRINCIPLEFORIFTHISISTHEGOODANDISITTHROUGHITSELFITISINASMUCHASITISCAUSEOFALLGOODSANDALLHENADSORACCORDINGTOEXISTENCEANDTHISISEACH'ODSINCEEACHOFTHEMISONEANDGOODEXISTENTIALLYORACCORDINGTOPARTICIPATIONANDTHISISWHATTHEREISOFUNITYANDGOODNESSINSUBSTANCES

4HECAVEATISTHATBEINGSPARTICIPATENOTONLYINONTICCLASSESBUTALSOINDIVINESERIESANDBEINGSPARTICIPATEINTHELATTERAPPARENTLYASINDIVIDUALSRATHERTHANASINSTANTIATINGFORMS4WOASINDIVIDUALSRATHERTHANASINSTANTIATINGFORMS4WOASINDIVIDUALSMODESOFREVERSIONARETHUSPOSSIBLEFORINDIVIDUALBEINGSONEBYWAYOFFORMWHICHISMEDIATEDBYTHEWHOLEOF"EINGTHEOTHERBYWAYOFTHEURGYANDREVERSIONUPONTHEINDIVIDUALTUTELARYDEITYONWHICHSEE!NDREW3MITH0ORPHYRYS0LACEINTHE.EOPLATONIC4RADITION!3TUDYIN0OST0LOTINIAN.EOPLATONISM4HE(AGUE#F)4)WHICHEXPLAINSTHAThITISNECESSARY)4)WHICHEXPLAINSTHAThITISNECESSARY)4TOOBSERVEASTABLEORDERINTHEPERFORMANCEOFDIVINEWORKSvSOTHATPRESERVINGhSEGREGATIONFROMEVERYOTHERPURSUITvANDTHUShBECOMINGALONEWEMAYASSOCIATEWITHSOLITARYDEITYANDNOTENDEAVORTOCONJOINOURSELVESWITHMULTITUDETOTHE/NE&ORHEWHOATTEMPTSTHISEFFECTSTHEVERYOPPOSITEANDSEPARATESHIMSELFFROMTHE'ODSv4HISPASSAGEILLUSTRATESNICELYTHEWAYTHATTHELANGUAGEOFUNITYANDMULTIPLICITYSOIMPORTANTIN0LATONISMISDEPLOYEDBY0ROCLUSINAMANNERNEVERCONmICTINGWITHHISPOLYTHEISMFORHERETHEINTEGRITYOFTHEINDIVIDUALWORSHIPERAPPROXIMATESTHEMTOTHESUPRAESSENTIALINDIVIDUALITYOFTHECHOSENDEITY$ECEM$UBITATIONES8$ECEM$UBITATIONES8$ECEM$UBITATIONES %XISTENTIAM%XISTENSRENDER%XISTENSRENDER%XISTENS HYPARXISINTHISPASSAGEACCORDINGHYPARXISINTHISPASSAGEACCORDINGHYPARXIS

TO#ARLOS3TEELh(UPARXISCHEZ0ROCLUSvIN(UPARXISCHEZ0ROCLUSvIN(UPARXIS (YPARXISE(YPOSTASISNEL.EOPLATONISMOED&2OMANO

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

4HISCORRESPONDSTOPROPOFTHE%LEMENTSWHICHSTATESTHAThALLTHATSUBSISTSINANYFASHIONISEITHERACCORDINGTOCAUSE;KATAITIAN=INTHEMODEOFAPRINCIPLEORACCORDINGTOEXISTENCE;HUPARXIS=ORACCORDINGTOPARTICIPATIONHUPARXIS=ORACCORDINGTOPARTICIPATIONHUPARXISINTHEMODEOFANIMAGEv"UTTHEINTERESTINGTHINGABOUTTHEWAYINWHICHTHEAXIOMISAPPLIEDINTHEPASSAGEFROMh4EN$OUBTSvISTHATUSUALLYWHEN0ROCLUSSPEAKSOFSOMETHINGSUBSISTINGKATAITIANITISAMATTEROFSEEINGhTHEPRODUCTASPREEXISTENTINTHEPRODUCERvPROPASWHENWEWOULDSPEAKOF)NTELLECTSUBSISTINGIN"EINGKATAITIAN"UTHERETHESUBSISTENCEOFTHE/NE)TSELFKATAITIANACTUALLYPOSITSITINTHINGSWHICHOSTENSIBLYAREFROMITNAMELYhALLGOODSANDALLHENADSv!NDYETTHISISTHE/NEANDTHE'OODASTHISISTHE/NEANDTHE'OODASTHIShlRSTPRINCIPLEv7HEREITISAMATTEROFTHESUBSISTENCEOFTHE/NEANDTHE'OODKATHHUPARXINWHICHISGENERALLYWHEREhWECONTEMPLATEEACHTHINGIN ITSOWNSTATION;KATA TKATA TKATA T NHEAUTOU TAXIN=NEITHER IN ITSCAUSENOR IN ITSRESULTANTvPROPTHE/NEANDTHE'OODEXISTSASEACH'ODASEACH'ODASEACH'OD4HE/NETHENWHENCONTEMPLATEDINITSOWNSTATIONISNOTANHYPOS

TATIZED/NE)TSELFBUTEACH'OD0ROCLUSEXPLAINSTHATTHE/NEASITEXISTSEACH'OD0ROCLUSEXPLAINSTHATTHE/NEASITEXISTSEACH'ODINTHE'ODSISSELFSUFlCIENTNOTLIKESOMETHINGEXISTINGINASUBSTRATUMTHATTHE/NEhTRULYISvASITISAMONGTHEMWHEREASINBEINGSITEXISTShASACHARACTERINSOMETHINGv4HEPOINTOFSUCHPASSAGESCANNOTBETHATTHE/NEEXISTSAMONGTHE'ODSASSOMETHINGSEPARATEFROMTHEM"UTNEITHERCANTHEPOINTBETOFOLDTHE'ODSINTOTHE/NE)NTHE0LATONIC4HEOLOGYFORINSTANCE0ROCLUSEXPLAINSTHATBYESTABLISHINGTHEHENADSNEITHEREACHASONEONLYINTHESAMEMANNERASTHE/NE)TSELFNOREACHASONEANDMANYLIKE"EINGWENOTONLYPRESERVETHETRANSCENDENCYOFTHElRSTBUTALSOENSURETHAThTHEHENADSPROCEEDINGFROMITAREUNCONFUSEDEITHERWITHRESPECTTOTHEMSELVESORTOTHEONEPRINCIPLEOFTHEMv"UTIFTHEMANIFOLDOFTHEHENADSWASAWHOLERATHERTHANAUNITARYSETINWHICHALLAREINEACHTHEHENADSWOULDPRECISELYNOTBEUNCONFUSEDWITHRESPECTTOEACHOTHERNORNOTBEUNCONFUSEDWITHRESPECTTOEACHOTHERNORNOTTOTHE/NE)TSELFFORTHEHENADSWOULDBECONTAINEDINTHE/NEASEFFECTSINTHEIRCAUSEATONCESPOILINGTHETRANSCENDENCYOFTHE&IRST0RINCIPLEANDSUBVERTINGTHEAUTONOMYOFTHE'ODS4HETRANSCENDENCYANDEFlCACYOFTHE&IRST0RINCIPLELIESPRECISELYINTHEFACTTHATITDOESNOTSUBORDINATETHEMANIFOLDOFTHE'ODS0ROCLUSREFERSTOTHEHENADICMANIFOLDAShTHETOTALITYOFTHEDIVINESET;PASTETHEIOSARITHMOSOFTHEDIVINESET;PASTETHEIOSARITHMOSOFTHEDIVINESET; =INVIRTUEOFWHICHISTHEBEINGORPASTETHEIOSARITHMOS=INVIRTUEOFWHICHISTHEBEINGORPASTETHEIOSARITHMOSRATHERPREBEING;PROEINAIRATHERPREBEING;PROEINAIRATHERPREBEING; =OFTHE'ODSvPROEINAI=OFTHE'ODSvPROEINAI 4HEhPREBEINGvOFTHE'ODSISHERESECUREDNOTASONEMIGHTEXPECTBYREFERENCETOTHE/NEBUTTOTHETOTALITYNOTWHOLENESSBUTTOTALITYOFTHEARITHMOSORhSETvITSELFITISAS$04AORMINA,EO3/LSCHKI%DITORE&IRENZE4HECORRESPONDENCEISATANYRATEEVIDENTFROMTHEPARALLELSTRUCTUREOF%4PROP%4PROP%4)0F)0F)004)))n04)))n04)0)0)0

%$7!2$0"54,%2

MUCHASTOSAYTHATTHE'ODSPOSSESSTHEIR'ODHOODFROMTHEMSELVES(ENCEHECALLSITWHENBEINGSTRICTANARITHMOSRATHERTHANAARITHMOSRATHERTHANAARITHMOS PLPLPL THOSFORPLPLPL THOSISTHOSISTHOSANOTIONARISINGATADISTINCTMOMENTINTHEPROCESSIONOF"EINGNAMELYIN THE INTELLIGIBLEANDINTELLECTUALORDERWHERE THENEGATIONSOF THE&IRST(YPOTHESISOFTHE0ARMENIDESBEGIN(EREMULTIPLICITY0ARMENIDESBEGIN(EREMULTIPLICITY0ARMENIDES PLBEGIN(EREMULTIPLICITYPLBEGIN(EREMULTIPLICITY PLPL THOSEMERGESINTHOSEMERGESINTHOSOPPOSITIONTOANDCONJUNCTIONWITHUNITY)NTHISWAY0ROCLUSCANSAYTHAThAMULTIPLICITYOFHENADSISDISCERNIBLElRSTINTHElRSTRANKOFTHEINTELLIGIBLEANDINTELLECTUALvTHATISAMULTIPLICITYTHATISUNIlEDTHATISUNIlEDTHATISUNIlED4HERESULTSOFTHISINVESTIGATIONOFTHEPRIMARYTEXTSCOULDBESYNTHESIZED

ASFOLLOWS)NTHEhPRODUCTIONvOFTHEHENADSFROMTHE/NETHEECONOMYOFCAUSALPROCESSIONBREAKSDOWNBECAUSETHE/NEULTIMATELYREPRESENTSEACH'ODSUNIQUENESSANDABSOLUTEINDIVIDUALITY4HE/NEWOULDSACRIlCEITSOWNPERFECTIONWEREITTOSUBSISTASSOMETHINGOVERANDABOVETHE'ODSLESTEACH'ODBELESSONEHENCETHEULTIMATECONSEQUENCEOFPURSUINGTHECONCEPTOFUNITYTOITSRADICALCONCLUSIONISTHATA/NEOVERTHISMANIFOLDORSUBSUMINGITWOULDIMPARTTOTHEMALESSERDEGREEOFUNITY0ROCESSIONhBYWAYOFUNITYvISINAREALSENSENOTPROCESSIONATALLIFTHEREISNO/NEBEYONDTHEHENADS0ROCESSIONBYUNITYISNOTAMATTEROFTHEMANIFOLDOFTHEHENADSVANISHINGINTOTHE/NEASIFTHEHENADSWEREBUThASPECTSvhADUMBRATIONSvORhPERSPECTIVESvOFTHE/NE4HE/NEISNOTONEANDITSPURPOSEISNOTTHESUBORDINATIONOFMULTIPLICITY4HECHARACTERISTICTHEHENADSPOSSESSINCOMMONISNONEOTHERTHANIRREDUCIBLEUNIQUENESSANDINDIVIDUALITY4HISUNIQUENESSANDINDIVIDUALITYISNOTNEGATIVEAFUNCTIONOFEACHHENADSDIFFERENCEORENCEORENCE DISCERNIBILITYFROMEVERYOTHERBUTDISCERNIBILITYFROMEVERYOTHERBUTDISCERNIBILITY POSITIVE4HISPOSITIVEINDIVIDUALITYMANIFESTESPECIALLYINTHEPROPERNAMEBORNEBYEACH'ODWHICHDENIESTHE/NEASSOMETHINGTHATCOULDSUBORDINATETHEMULTIPLICITYOF'ODSTOITISINFACTHOWTHE/NEhTRULYISv4HEPRESENCEOFALLTHEHENADSINEACHGROUNDSTHEHENADICMANIFOLDASASETOFABSOLUTEINDIVIDUALSINASMUCHASTHATWHICHHASNOOTHEROUTSIDEITWHICHHASITSOTHERINITSELFISMOREINDIVIDUALTHANINDIVIDUALTHANINDIVIDUALTHATWHICHCONFRONTSANOTHERTHROUGHDIFFERENCE)NACCORDTHENWITHTHECONCLUSIONOFTHE&IRST(YPOTHESISOFTHE0ARMENIDESTHATTHE/NENEITHER0ARMENIDESTHATTHE/NENEITHER0ARMENIDESISNORISONEWESHOULDSAYTHATTHE/NEISASEACHHENADEACH'ODRATHERISASEACHHENADEACH'ODRATHERISTHANASTHEHYPOSTATIZEDENTITYTHATFOROUROWNCONVENIENCETOBEABLETOREFERTODIVINEACTIVITYINGENERICFASHIONWEREFERTOAShTHE/NE)TSELFv4HEREISNOSUCHTHINGASTHE/NE)TSELFIFWEMEANSOMETHINGNOSUCHTHINGASTHE/NE)TSELFIFWEMEANSOMETHINGNOSUCHTHING DIFFERENTTHANDIFFERENTTHANDIFFERENTTHEHENADS'ODHOODISNOTHINGBUTTHE'ODSTHEMSELVES)NTHISWAYTHE/NE ISCLEARLYANDUNEQUIVOCALLYDISTINGUISHEDFROMTHE/NETHATIS THE-ONADOF"EINGWHICHSUBSISTSITSELFASSOMETHINGUNIlED

)0)0)0"EINGISREFERREDTOAT04)))AShNOTONLYSTANDINGINTHE/NEBUTRECEIVINGA04)))AShNOTONLYSTANDINGINTHE/NEBUTRECEIVINGA04

MULTIPLICITY;PLMULTIPLICITY;PLMULTIPLICITY; PLPL THOS=OFHENADSANDPOWERSWHICHAREMINGLEDINTOONEESSENCE;THOS=OFHENADSANDPOWERSWHICHAREMINGLEDINTOONEESSENCE;THOS OUSIAN=vn

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

4HEABOVEACCOUNTWHILEITMAYSEEMPROVOCATIVEISGROUNDEDULTIMATELYINMOTIVESWHICHSHOULDBEREGARDEDASMODEST&IRST0ROCLUS SHOULDBEAPPROACHEDASASYSTEMATICTHINKERUNTILTHEIMPRACTICABILITYOFSUCHANAPPROACHPRESENTSITSELFTHUSITSHOULDBELEGITIMATETOUSETHETEXTSOF0ROCLUSTOILLUMINATEONEANOTHER3ECONDTHEPRINCIPLEOFHERMENEUTICCHARITYSHOULDGUIDEUSINOURREADINGOF0ROCLUSREQUIRINGUSNOTTOATTRIBUTEOPENCONTRADICTIONSEMPTYRHETORICORWILLFULPARADOXTOTEXTSWHEREAMOREFRUITFULMEANINGCANBEFOUND)WOULDARGUETHATTHISPRINCIPLEINITSELFEVENABSENTOTHERCONSIDERATIONSLEGITIMATESJUXTAPOSINGTHENEGATIVITYOFTHE/NEWITHNEGATIVITYOFTHE/NEWITHNEGATIVITYTHEPOSITIVEPLURALISMOFTHEHENADOLOGYINORDERTOSAVETHEFORMERFROMPOSITIVEPLURALISMOFTHEHENADOLOGYINORDERTOSAVETHEFORMERFROMPOSITIVEOBSCURITYANDTHELATTERFROMTRIVIALITY4HIRDLYTOSEEINTHERESULTINGSYSTEMANEXPRESSIONOF0ROCLUSPOLYTHEISMISSIMPLYTOENTERTAINAREADINGOFHISSYSTEMINWHICHTHERELIGIOUSINTERESTHECONSTANTLYEXPRESSESANDREGARDSASESSENTIAL TOHISPHILOSOPHICALENTERPRISE IS SEENNOTASADVENTITIOUSBUTASORGANICANDINDEEDASHAVINGBEENASTIMULUSTOWARDANOVELSETOFAPPROACHESTOCLASSICPHILOSOPHICALPROBLEMS)TISPASTTIMEFORAMOREBALANCEDAPPROACHINTHELITERATUREANDNOTONLYINTHECASEOF0ROCLUS-OREOVERTHELITERATUREDOESNOTLACKFOROVERTLYMONOTHEIZINGREADINGSOF0ROCLUSDESPITETHEVIOLENCETHISDOESBOTHTO0ROCLUSOWNATTESTEDPIETYFORTHETRADITIONAL'ODSOFHISOWNANDOTHERNATIONSASWELLASTOTHESYSTEMATICNEGATIVITYOFTHE/NE0ANTHEISTICREADINGSARENOLESSVIOLENTALTHOUGHTHEYAREATLEASTMORECOGNIZANTOFTHERISKOFHYPOSTATIZINGTHE/NEEVENINTHECONTEXTOFA hNEGATIVE THEOLOGYv4HE INTRINSIC VALUE THE POLYTHEIST ACCORDS TO THEDISTINCTIDENTITIESANDAUTONOMYOFTHEINDIVIDUAL'ODSACTSBYCONTRASTASABULWARKAGAINSTILLICITHYPOSTATIZATIONOFTHE/NE)NCLOSING)WOULDLIKETOREVIEWCERTAINANTECEDENTSOFTHISREADINGIN

THE LITERATURE7HITTAKER REMARKSONhANELEMENTOF EXPLICITPLURALISM INHIS;0ROCLUS=DOCTRINEvANDTHATh0ROCLUSSEEKSTHECAUSEOFPLURALITYINTHINGSATAHIGHERSTAGETHANTHEINTELLIGIBLEWORLDx"EFOREBEINGANDMINDAREPRODUCEDTHE/NEACTSASITWERETHROUGHMANYPOINTSOFORIGINv7HITTAKERRECOGNIZESTHEPROBLEMHOWEVERWITHASSERTINGTHATTHE/NEhACTSvPERSEASKING

WHATISTHEMEANINGOF@CREATIONBYTHE/NE)TMEANSFORBOTHPHILOSOPHERS;0LOTINUSAND0ROCLUS=ESSENTIALLYTHISTHATWITHOUTUNITYINANDOVERTHESYSTEMOFTHINGSTHERE

.OTICEHOWTHEUNITYOFTHEHENADSONLYCOMESABOUTTHROUGHAhMINGLINGvPOSTERIORTOTHEIRHUPARXIS)TISTHISMINGLINGTHATPRODUCESTHEDECLINEIN"EINGNOTTHEEXISTENCEOFMANY'ODSBUTTHEIRCOALESCENCEINANDTHROUGHTHE)NTELLECT&ORTHE'ODSAREONLYlNALLYhMINGLEDvINTOONEESSENCEAND"EINGITSELFFULLYCONSTITUTEDINTHEHYPOSTASISOF)NTELLECTTHATISINASINGLEFORMALREGIME3EEEG4ROUILLARDSCOMMENTSIN,AMYSTAGOGIEDE0ROCLOSONTHEDANGERhFAIREDUSI,AMYSTAGOGIEDE0ROCLOSONTHEDANGERhFAIREDUSI,AMYSTAGOGIEDE0ROCLOS

LENCEUNECONTREEXPRESSIONDELANUITUNSECRETETDUNANTUNESUBSTANCEMYSTRIEUSEv

%$7!2$0"54,%2

WOULDBENOPARTICULAREXISTENCEASANACTUALLYREALIZEDTHING)TDOESNOTMEANTHATABSTRACTUNITYWITHOUTTHELATENTEXISTENCEOFAMANYASITWEREINITSOWNRIGHTCALLSITFROMNOTHINGINTOBEINGF

4HENOTIONOF LATENCYOFCOURSE ISEQUALLY IMPRACTICABLE INREGARDTOTHE/NE

&ORAREALUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEIR;THE.EOPLATONISTS=POSITIONHOWEVERWEMUSTEQUALLYAVOIDATTRIBUTINGTOTHEMTHEIDEASOFVOLITIONALCREATIONANDOF@PANTHEISTICABSORPTION4HEMANYARENEVERlNALLYABSORBEDINTOTHE/NEANDTHEREFOREON.EOPLATONICPRINCIPLESTHEREWASNEVERATIMEWHENTHEYDIDNOTINSOMESENSEEXISTASAMANY/NTHIS0ROCLUSISMOREEXPLICITTHAN0LOTINUS

7HITTAKERTAKESNOTABLECAREWITHRESPECTTOTHEDOCTRINEOFTHEHENADS)NANAREAWHICHISPRONETOMISUNDERSTANDINGFORINSTANCEHERECOGNIZESFTHATHENADSPARTICIPATEDINBYLOWERONTICHYPOSTASESARENOLESSHENADSTHANTHOSEPARTICIPATEDBYHIGHERONESANDWITHRESPECTTOTHEDISTINCTIONBETWEENHENADSANDMONADSHESEESTHEMONADAShTHEUNITYOFAGROUPvANDDOESNOTCONmATEMONADSANDHENADS!SFARASHEWENT7HITTAKERTHUSLAIDOUTAPROMISINGPATHFORRESEARCH!MONGMORE RECENTCOMMENTATORSON THEHENADSHOWEVER THEMOST

PROMISINGCONTRIBUTIONSHAVEBEENMADENOTBYTHOSE FOCUSINGSQUARELYONTHEMETAPHYSICSOFTHEHENADSBUTTHOSEWHOSEINTERESTLIESINTHECONSEQUENCESOFTHEHENADOLOGYFORINDIVIDUALSATTHEBOTTOMOFTHE.EOPLATONICHIERARCHY(EREITSEEMSITHASBEENPERCEIVEDTHATTHEREISASTAKEINRECOGNIZINGREALLYDISTINCTPROPERTIESOFTHESUPRAESSENTIALDOMAIN!NDREW3MITHINHISSTUDYOFTHEURGYIN0ORPHYRYS0LACEINTHE.EOPLATONIC4RADITION!3TUDYIN0OST0LOTINIAN.EOPLATONISMDISCUSSESTHEHENADSWITHRESPECTTOTHEIRCONNECTIONTOTHEURGYANDTHECONCEPTOFTHESUNTHMATACALLINGATTENTIONTOASERIESOFPASSAGESFROM/LYMPIODORUSWHICHHECORRELATESWITHPASSAGESIN0ROCLUSANDWHICHDISTINGUISHTHEURGICVIRTUESASHENIAIAIORhUNITARYvBYHENIAIAIORhUNITARYvBYHENIAIAICONTRASTWITHTHEONTICVIRTUESWHICHAREhSUBSTANTIALvORhSUBSTANTIFYINGvOUSIDEIS ANDASPOSSESSINGHUPARXIS IN CONTRAST TO THEHUPARXIS IN CONTRAST TO THEHUPARXIS OUSIA OF THEONTICOUSIA OF THEONTICOUSIAVIRTUES4HEDISTINCTIONBETWEENTHEREGIMESOFSUNTHMATAANDOF&ORMSMATAANDOF&ORMSMATAMANIFESTSITSELFINTHEDIFFERENTSTRUCTURE)AMBLICHUSACCORDSTOTHEEPITEPITEPIT DEIOTDEIOT DEIOTDEIOT SS ORhSUITABILITYvFORPARTICIPATIONINFORMSASCOMPAREDTOTHESUITABILITYTOPARTICIPATEINSUNTHMATAMATA !S3MITHPOINTSOUThTHECONTINUITYOF.EOPLATONICONTOLOGICALPROCESSIONSEEMSTOBREAKDOWNHEREvINASMUCHASTHENORMALORDEROFREVERSIONUPTHEHIERARCHYOFONTICHYPOSTASEShHASBEENASITWEREBYPASSEDANDAMOREDIRECTMODEOFCONTACTWITHTHEDIVINECREATEDv3MITHEXPLAINSTHAT

4HE(AGUE-.IJHOFF

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

)AMBLICHUSEPITEPITEPIT DEIOTDEIOT DEIOTDEIOT SS FORDIVINEMANTICISOVERANDABOVENORMALSFORDIVINEMANTICISOVERANDABOVENORMALS EPITEPITEPIT DEIOTDEIOT DEIOTDEIOT SS FORFORMSFORFORMS0ROCLUSDISTINGUISHESSUNTHMAAND&ORM4HISSEEMSTOIMPLYTHATTHEDIVINECHANNELMAAND&ORM4HISSEEMSTOIMPLYTHATTHEDIVINECHANNELMAWHICHAIDSINASCENTISDIFFERENTFROMTHEONTOLOGICALPROCESSIONOF&ORM/NABROADERBASIS0ROCLUSDISTINGUISHESHENADSANDTANOTA4HEHENADSINTHEIRMANIFESTATIONATDIFFERENT LEVELS ARE INDEPENDENT OF THENOTA OR &ORMS4HUS THEURGYWHICHWORKSTA OR &ORMS4HUS THEURGYWHICHWORKSTATHROUGHTHEHENADSLEADSTOADIVORCEOFTHESPIRITUALASCENTFROMTHECONTEMPLATIONOF&ORMSN

3MITHRECOGNIZESFURTHERTHATTHEACTIVITYOFTHESUPRAESSENTIALREALMWITHRESPECTTOBEINGSISTOIMPARTAUNITYWHICHISTOBEUNDERSTOODASIDIOTIDIOTIDIOT SS THATISINDIVIDUALPECULIARITY4HISISALREADYIMPLICITFROMTHEVERYNOTIONOFTHESUNTHMAWHICHISNOTJUSTAPARTICULARTYPEOFBEINGBUTAPARTICULARhDIVINIZEDv INDIVIDUAL FOREVENIF THE SUNTHMA IS SELECTEDBECAUSEOF THEMA IS SELECTEDBECAUSEOF THEMATYPEOFBEINGITISSAYAPARTICULARSPECIESOFHERBORSTONEITISNECESSARILYDIVINIZEDASEGTHISPIECEOFCARNELIAN&URTHERMOREITSSIGNIlCANCETOTHISPIECEOFCARNELIAN&URTHERMOREITSSIGNIlCANCETOTHISTHETHEURGICRITUALLIESNOTINITSPOSITIONINTHEONTICHIERARCHYBUTINITSRELATIONTOTHEMYTHSANDATTRIBUTESOFPARTICULARDEITIES0UTTINGTOGETHERTHEPIECESINAMANNERTHAT3MITHDOESNOTINASMUCHASTHEMETAPHYSICSOFTHEHENADSISNOTHISCHIEFCONCERNONECOULDCONCLUDETHATTHEUNITYCORRESPONDINGTOTHE/NEANDCONFERREDBYITISALSOAGENERICALLYDISTINCTMODEOFUNITYTHATISINDIVIDUALITYh,ATHORIEDESHNADESETLAMYSTIQUEDE0ROCLUSvBY#HRISTIAN'URARD

$IONYSIUSBEGINSFROMTHEASPIRATIONTORECOVERTHEUNITYOFTHETHEOLOGICALANDSYSTEMATICFUNCTIONSOFTHEDOCTRINEOFTHEHENADSANDTHETHINGS'URARDSAYSABOUTTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENTHE/NEANDTHEHENADSALBEITBRIEFAREMUCHINHARMONYWITHTHEPRESENTESSAY'URARDSREADINGFOLLOWSINTHEFOOTSTEPSOF4ROUILLARDWHORECOGNIZEDINTHENEGATIVITYOFTHE/NE)TSELFANOPPORTUNITYFORAPOSTIVEPLURALISMBUT4ROUILLARDFORHISOWNPARTANDINACCORDWITHTHEGENERALMOTIVATIONSOFTHEhMYSTICALvSCHOOLEVINCESNOINTERESTINTHEHENADOLOGYCONmATINGHENADSANDMONADSINNOWAYDISTINGUISHINGTHESUPRAESSENTIALANDONTICMODESOFUNITYANDEFFACINGANYPOLYTHEISTICASPECTOFTHEDOCTRINEORIDENTIlCATIONOFTHEHENADSWITHTHEPAGAN'ODS4ROUILLARDSPEAKSOFhPOLYCENTRICPROCESSIONvIN0ROCLUSA TERMWHICHWOULDBEADMIRABLYAPPLICABLE TO THEHENADSBUTMEANSNOTHINGMOREBYITTHANTHEVENERABLEAXIOMALREADYOFHOARYANTIQUITYFOR)AMBLICHUShALLTHINGSAREINALLTHINGSBUTEACHACCORDINGTOITSPROPERNATUREvEG%4PROP%4PROP%4 'URARDALTHOUGHIDENTIFYINGWITH4ROUILLARDS

3EE,AMYSTAGOGIEDE0ROCLOSESPECIALLYCHAP#OMPARE$IANA%CKSCHARACTERIZATIONOF(INDUISMAShRADICALLYPOLYTHEISTICvINASMUCH

ASITIShPOLYCENTRICv$ARSAN3EEINGTHE$IVINE)MAGEIN)NDIARDED;.EW9ORK#OLUMBIA50RESS=FF ,AMYSTAGOGIEDE0ROCLOS,AMYSTAGOGIEDE0ROCLOS,AMYSTAGOGIEDE0ROCLOS

%$7!2$0"54,%2

TRADITIONSEEKSTORESTORETHEHENADSTOTHESYSTEM4HElRSTPROPOSITIONOFTHE%LEMENTSOF4HEOLOGYHESTRESSESISNOTTOBEINTERPRETEDASSAYINGTHATTHEHENADSPARTICIPATETHE/NEINSTEADINACCORDWITHTHECHOICESALREADYMADEBYTRANSLATORS4ROUILLARDAND$ODDSALIKEASHEPUTSIThILNEFAUTENEFFETPASMETTREDEMAJUSCULECETUNGNRAL;IETHETOHENOFTHElRSTTHREEPROPOSITIONS=QUINESTPASL5NvNP4HEIMPORTANCEOFTHISPOINTFOR'URARDISTHAT

APRSL5NSERANCESSAIREMENTLENOMBREHNADIQUEQUICONTRAIREMENTLADOCTRINEJAMBLIQUIENNENESTQUELASOMME@UNIEDES5NSETNONPASUNEHYPOSTASEINDIVIDUELLE$ELASORTELESTRESNEPARTICIPERONTPASCEQUISERAITUNUNIlMAISBELETBIENDES5NS$ANSUNETELLEOPTIQUEILNESAURAITTREQUESTIONDUN5NPARTICIPNIDEPARTICIPATIONUNUNIl)LFAUTAUCONTRAIREQUELAPARTICIPATIONLUNSOITLAPARTICIPATIONDES5NS

3INCE'URARDSINTERESTISPRIMARILYINTHECONSEQUENCESOFTHEHENADOLOGYFORBEINGSRATHERTHANINEXPLICATINGTHESTATUSOFTHEHENADSTHEMSELVESHEDOESLITTLETODRAWOUTTHEIMPLICATIONSOFTHISDOCTRINEOFh/NESv!NDYETHESUGGESTSHEISNOTUNAWAREOFTHEPOSSIBILITYOFJUSTSUCHANINTERPRETATIONASTHEPRESENTESSAYOFFERSBYHISPROVOCATIVEREMARKTHATh;I=LCONVIENTDERAPPELERQUE@STRICTOSENSUCHEZ0ROCLUSILNYAPASDHNOLOGIEMAISUNEHNADOLOGIEvNP4HElRSTPROPOSITIONOFTHE%4WHENIT%4WHENIT%4hNONCEQUETOUTPARTICIPEOBLIGATOIREMENTLUNxSIGNIlEVIDEMMENTQUETOUTPARTICIPEL5NPARLES(NADESETNONQUEL5NSOITPARTICIPOUQUILSOITUNv)NACCORDWITHTHEARGUMENTOFTHEPRESENTESSAYTHENTHEREREALLYISNOh/NEvTHEREAREONLY/NESTHATISTHEHENADS'URARDSAYSTHATTHEHENADShNESONTDONCPASDES@PARTICIPANTSL5NMAISDEPURES@PARTICIPATIONSvANDTHATTHEREAREBESIDESTHEMONLYTHEhIRRADIATEDSTATESOFUNITYvOF%4PROPANDTHATh%NTREELLES;THEHENADS=ETL5NILNE%4PROPANDTHATh%NTREELLES;THEHENADS=ETL5NILNE%4FAUTPASTABLIRUNRAPPORTDEMETHEXISMAISDESIMPLEPRODOSDOS v4HEHENADSARETHUSPRESERVEDFROMLOSINGTHEIRAUTONOMYTOANHYPOSTATIZED/NEBUTSOTOOISTHEPRINCIPLEOFIRREDUCIBLEINDIVIDUALITYITSELFPRESERVEDFROMTHEEXIGENCIESOFONTICLOGICTHEOLOGICALANDPHILOSOPHICALEXIGENCIESCOINCIDING'URARDCALLSTHEFACTTHAThLES(NADESSONTAUTONOMESETNECONSTITUTENT PAS UN HYPOSTASE UNIlEv THEIR hHORIZONTALv CHARACTERISTICHEPROCEEDSTOANALYZETHESIGNIlCANCEOFTHEhVERTICALvDIMENSIONOFTHEHENADOLOGY)HAVECOMMENTEDSEENABOVEONTHESIGNIlCANCEOFTHEDOCTRINE THAT THEHIERARCHICALMANIFESTATIONOF THEHENADS AS INTELLIGIBLEINTELLIGIBLEANDINTELLECTUAL INTELLECTUAL AND EVEN INFRAINTELLECTUAL'ODSDOESNOTMAKETHEMEMBERSOFTHESEDIVINEORDERSANYLESSHENADSINTHEIRHUPARXEIS'URARDDISCERNS THE CONTRASTBETWEEN THEHENADSPOLYCENTRICEXISTENCEANDTHEIRHIERARCHICALMANIFESTATIONWHICHINTURNGRANTSTO"E

0/,94(%)3-!.$).$)6)$5!,)49).4(%(%.!$)#-!.)&/,$

ING ITSHIERARCHICALNATUREBECAUSEOFHIS INTEREST IN THE ANTIHIERARCHICALIMPLICATIONSOFTHISCONTRASTFORBEINGS4HATTHEREAREORDERSOFTHE'ODSPROCEEDINGTOTHELASTORDERSOF"EINGMEANSTHATAS'URARDPUTSIThLAPARTICIPATIONLUNESTPARTICIPATIONAUX5NSETNONLUNITDELTREQUIPRCDEv4HATISBEINGSAREDIVINIZEDDIRECTLYATEACHLEVELSOTHATTHEIROPPORTUNITY FOR REVERSIONDOESNOT ARISE EXCLUSIVELY FROM REVERSIONUPONALLTHEHYPOSTASESLYINGBETWEENTHEMANDTHE&IRST0RINCIPLEONTHEONTICLADDER'URARDCONCLUDESBYENDORSINGTHECOMMENTSOF4ROUILLARDWHOOPPOSED"RHIERSCHARACTERIZATIONOFTHE0ROCLEANSYSTEMASONEINWHICHhCHAQUERALITRESTESAPLACEDANSUNEHIRARCHIElGEvBYARGUINGFORATENDENCYIN0ROCLUSWHICHhPORTECONSIDRERTOUSLESORDRESMMELESDERNIERSCOMMEDESRAYONSIMMDIATEMENTISSUSDUCENTREUNIVERSAL4OUSDEVIENNENTDESMODESNONPASGAUXMAISDIRECTSDEL5Nv)NDEEDAS'URARDPOINTSOUThLAPRIMAUTDELUNSURLTREPRENDICITOUTSONSENSvNAMELYFROMTHEPOLYCENTRICITYOFTHEHENADS)NASSERTINGTHAThLIDEDEHIRARCHIEFONDAMENTALEDANSTOUTLEPLATONISMENEVAUTPLUSxPARRAPPORTAUXDIEUXvTHEHENADOLOGYTRULYDOESREPRESENTSOMETHINGhRVOLUTIONNAIREDANSLAPENSEGRECQUECLASSIQUEv4HIShREVOLUTIONARYvPOTENTIALWILLHOWEVERBEEASILYSQUANDEREDWITHOUT

APROPERAPPRECIATIONOFTHEVALUEOFPOLYTHEISMFORTHESYSTEM4OSPEAKAS'URARDDOESOFhMODESOFTHE/NEvWHICHWOULDBEHARMLESSENOUGHINITSELFWERETHEUNDERSTANDINGOFTHESYSTEMONlRMERGROUNDWILLOTHERWISETENDINEXORABLYTOENCOURAGELESSPERSPICUOUSCOMMENTATORSINHYPOSTATIZINGTHE/NEANDEFFACINGTHEINDIVIDUALITYANDAUTONOMYOFTHEHENADS!NIMPULSETORENDERTHEHENADSEVANESCENTISALREADYHINTEDATBY'URARDSAMBIGUOUSCHARACTERIZATIONOFTHEHENADSAShPUREPARTICIPATIONSvASIFTHEHENADSAREATLASTMERELYTHEEVENTOFTHEIRPARTICIPANTS"EYONDPERPETUATINGTHEHISTORICALERASUREOFASUBTLEANDPROFOUNDPOLYTHEISTICTHEOLOGYTHEPRINCIPLESSUSTAININGTHECOHERENCEANDVIABILITYOF0ROCLUSSYSTEMWOULDTHUSBEOBSCUREDASYSTEMTHEGRASPOFWHICHMUSTBEREGARDEDASINHERENTLYENDANGEREDINAPOLEMICALENVIRONMENTFAILINGTOACKNOWLEDGETHEINTRINSICVALUEFOR0ROCLUSOFTHE'ODSTHEMSELVES

4HISEXCHANGEBETWEEN"RHIERAND4ROUILLARDSHOULDBEREAD IN THECONTEXTOF THECONmICTBETWEENh(EGELIANvANDh"ERGSONIANvSTRAINSINTHE&RENCHRETRIEVALOF.EOPLATONISMASDISCUSSEDBY7AYNE*(ANKEYIN/NE(UNDRED9EARSOF.EOPLATONISMIN&RANCE0ERHAPSASCOMMENTATORSLEARNTOBETTERAPPRECIATETHERICHNESSANDCOMPLEXITYOF.EOPLATONICTHOUGHTRATHERTHANSEEKINGRELENTLESSLYTOSTREAMLINEITh"ERGSONIANvANDh(EGELIANvMOMENTSANDOTHERSTOOWILLBEFOUNDTOBEEQUALLYACCOMMODATEDINTHEMOSTSYSTEMATICEXPRESSIONSSUCHASTHATOF0ROCLUS

#F4ROUILLARD-YSTAGOGIEh$IEUNEXISTEPASCOMME$IEUSANSTHOPHANIEv