group m analytics (part 2)

76
[ GroupM Analy.cs ] Advanced analy+cs training

Upload: datalicious-pty-ltd

Post on 29-Nov-2014

687 views

Category:

Technology


3 download

DESCRIPTION

The presentation discusses course training on advanced analytics.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  GroupM  Analy.cs  ]  Advanced  analy+cs  training  

Page 2: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Quick  recap  ]  

101011010010010010101111010010010101010100001011111001010101010100101011001100010100101001101101001101001010100111001010010010101001001010010100100101001111101010100101001001001010  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   2  

Page 3: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Day  1:  Basic  Analy.cs  ]  

§  Defining  a  metrics  framework  – What  to  report  on,  when  and  why?  – Matching  strategic  and  tac+cal  goals  to  metrics  – Covering  all  major  categories  of  business  goals  

§  Finding  and  developing  the  right  data  – Data  sources  across  channels  and  goals  – Meaningful  trends  vs.  100%  accurate  data  – Human  and  technological  limita+ons  

§  Plus  hands-­‐on  exercises  August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   3  

Page 4: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Day  1:  Basic  Analy.cs  ]  

§  Hands-­‐on  exercises  and  examples  – Funnel  breakdowns  – Conversions  metrics  – Metrics  framework  – Search  insights  – Duplica+on  impact  – Sta+s+cal  significance  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   4  

Page 5: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Course  overview  ]  

101011010010010010101111010010010101010100001011111001010101010100101011001100010100101001101101001101001010100111001010010010101001001010010100100101001111101010100101001001001010  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   5  

Page 6: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Day  2:  Advanced  Analy.cs  ]  

§  Campaign  flow  and  media  aSribu+on  – Designing  a  campaign  flow  including  metrics  – Omniture  vs.  Google  Analy+cs  capabili+es  

§  How  to  reduce  media  waste  – Tes+ng  and  targe+ng  in  a  media  world  – Media  vs.  content  and  usability  

§  Plus  hands-­‐on  exercises  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   6  

Page 7: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Media  a?ribu.on  ]  

101011010010010010101111010010010101010100001011111001010101010100101011001100010100101001101101001101001010100111001010010010101001001010010100100101001111101010100101001001001010  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   7  

Page 8: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Direct  mail,    email,  etc  

Facebook  Twi?er,  etc  

[  Campaign  flow  and  calls  to  ac.on  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   8  

POS  kiosks,  loyalty  cards,  etc  

CRM  program  

Home  pages,  portals,  etc  

YouTube,    blog,  etc  

Paid    search  

Organic    search  

Landing  pages,  offers,  etc  

PR,  WOM,  events,  etc  

TV,  print,    radio,  etc  

C2  

C3  

=  Paid  media  

=  Viral  elements  

Call  center,    retail  stores,  etc  

=  Coupons,  surveys  

Display  ads,  affiliates,  etc  

C1  

Page 9: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Exercise:  Campaign  flow  

Page 10: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Unique  calls  to  ac.on  ]  §  Unique  click-­‐through  URLs  §  Unique  vanity  domains  or  URLs  §  Unique  phone  numbers  §  Unique  search  terms  §  Unique  email  addresses  §  Unique  personal  URLs  (PURLs)  §  Unique  SMS  numbers,  QR  codes  §  Unique  promo+onal  codes,  vouchers  §  Geographic  loca+on  (Facebook,  FourSquare)  §  Regression  analysis  of  cause  and  effect  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   10  

Page 11: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Search  call  to  ac.on  for  offline  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   11  

Page 12: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

TV    audience  

Search  audience  

Banner  audience  

[  Reach  and  channel  overlap  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   12  

Page 13: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Indirect  display  impact  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   13  

Page 14: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Indirect  display  impact  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   14  

Page 15: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  De-­‐duplica.on  across  channels  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   15  

Banner    Ads  

Email    Blast  

Paid    Search  

Organic  Search  

$  Bid    Mgmt  

Ad    Server  

Email  Pla^orm  

Google  Analy.cs  

$  

$  

$  

Central  Analy.cs  Pla^orm  

$  

$  

$  

Page 16: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Success  a?ribu.on  models  ]  

Banner    Ad  $100  

Email    Blast  

Paid    Search  $100  

Banner    Ad  $100  

Affiliate    Referral  $100  

Success  $100  

Success  $100  

Banner    Ad  

Paid    Search  

Organic  Search  $100  

Success  $100  

Last  channel  gets  all  credit  

First  channel  gets  all  credit  

All  channels  get  equal  credit  

Print    Ad  $33  

Social    Media  $33  

Paid    Search  $33  

Success  $100  

All  channels  get  par.al  credit  

Paid    Search  

August  2010   16  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

Page 17: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  First  and  last  click  a?ribu.on  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   17  

Chart  shows  percentage  of  channel  touch  points  that  lead  to  a  conversion.  

Neither  first    nor  last-­‐click  measurement  would  provide  true  picture    

Paid/Organic  Search  

Emails/Shopping  Engines  

Page 18: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Paid  and  organic  stacking  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   18  

Page 19: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Closer  

SEM  Generic  

Banner    View  

TV    Ad  

[  Full  path  to  purchase  ]  

Influencer   Influencer  

August  2010   19  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

$  

Banner  Click   $  

SEO  Generic  

Affiliate  Click   $  

SEO  Branded  

Direct    Visit  

Email  Update   Abandon  

Direct    Visit  

Social  Media  

SEO  Branded  

Introducer  

Page 20: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   20  

Page 21: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Closer  

SEM  Generic  

Banner    View  

TV    Ad  

[  Impact  of  cookie  expira.on  ]  

Influencer   Influencer  

August  2010   21  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

$  

Banner  Click   $  

SEO  Generic  

Affiliate  Click   $  

SEO  Branded  

Direct    Visit  

Email  Update   Abandon  

Direct    Visit  

Social  Media  

SEO  Branded  

Introducer  

Page 22: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Closer  

25%  

[  Success  a?ribu.on  models  ]  

Influencer   Influencer  

August  2010   22  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

$  

25%   Even    A?rib.  

Exclusion  A?rib.  

Pa?ern  A?rib.  

25%   25%  

Introducer  

33%   33%   33%   0%  

30%   20%   20%   30%  

Page 23: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Forrester  media  a?ribu.on  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   23  

Source:  Forrester,  2009  

Forrester  adds  another  dimension  to  media  aSribu+on  by  sugges+ng  to  change  the  allocated  credit  for  each  campaign  touch  point  based  on  addi+onal  factors  such  as  site  interac+on.  

Page 24: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Exercise:  A?ribu.on  model  

Page 25: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Closer  

25%  

[  Exercise:  A?ribu.on  models  ]  

Influencer   Influencer  

August  2010   25  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

$  

25%   Even    A?rib.  

Exclusion  A?rib.  

Custom  A?rib.  

25%   25%  

Introducer  

33%   33%   33%   0%  

?   ?   ?   ?  

Page 26: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Exercise:  A?ribu.on  model  ]  

§  Allocate  more  conversion  credits  to  more  recent  touch  points  for  brands  with  a  strong  baseline  to  s+mulate  repeat  purchases    

§  Allocate  more  conversion  credits  to  more  recent  touch  points  for  brands  with  a  direct  response  focus  

§  Allocate  more  conversion  credits  to  ini+a+ng  touch  points  for  new  and  expensive  brands  and  products  to  insert  them  into  the  mindset  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   26  

Page 27: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Channel   Direct,  Branded  

Paid    Search  

Organic  Search  

Display    Ads  

Affiliates,  Partners  

Email  Updates  

Direct,  Branded   n/a  

Paid  Search   n/a  

Organic  Search   n/a  

Display    Ads   n/a  

Affiliates  Partners   n/a  

Email  Updates   n/a  

[  Understanding  channel  overlap  ]  

August  2010   27  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

display  >  sem  >  seo  >  affiliate  >  email  >  direct  >  $$$  

Page 28: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Understanding  channel  overlap  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   28  

Display    Ads  

Paid  Search  

Direct  

DM  eDMs  

Radio  

Organic  Search  

Partners  

Call  Centre  

Page 29: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Website  entry  survey  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   29  

Channel   %  of  Conversions  

Straight  to  Site   27%  

SEO  Branded   15%  

SEM  Branded   9%  

SEO  Generic   7%  

SEM  Generic   14%  

Display  Adver+sing   7%  

Affiliate  Marke+ng   9%  

Referrals   5%  

Email  Marke+ng   7%  

De-­‐duped  Campaign  Report  

}  Channel   %  of  Influence  

Word  of  Mouth   32%  

Blogging  &  Social  Media   24%  

Newspaper  Adver+sing   9%  

Display  Adver+sing   14%  

Email  Marke+ng   7%  

Retail  Promo+ons   14%  

Greatest  Influencer  on  Branded  Search  /  STS  

Conversions  aSributed  to  search  terms  that  contain  brand  keywords  and  direct  website  visits  are  most  likely  not  the  origina+ng  channel  that  generated  the  awareness  and  as  such  conversion  credits  should  be  re-­‐allocated.    

Page 30: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Ad  server  exposure  test  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   30  

User  qualifies  for  the  display  campaign  (if  the  user  has  already  been  tagged  go  to  step  3)  

Audience  Segmenta.on  10%  of  users  in  control  group,  90%  in  exposed  group  

2  

1  

User  tagged  with  segment  

3  

1st  impression  

N  impressions  

Control  (displayed  non-­‐branded  message)  

Exposed  (displayed  branded  message)  

Measurement:  Conversions  per  1000  unique  visitors  

Control  (displayed  non-­‐branded  message)  

Exposed  (displayed  branded  message)  

User  remains  in  segment  

Page 31: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Research  online,  shop  offline  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   31  

Source:  2008  Digital  Future  Report,  Surveying  The  Digital  Future,  Year  Seven,  USC  Annenberg  School  

Page 32: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Track  offline  sales  driven  by  online  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   32  

Website  research  

Phone  order  

Retail  order  

Online  order  

Cookie  

Adver.sing    campaign  

Credit  check,  fulfilment  

Online  order  confirma.on  

Virtual  order  confirma.on  

Confirma.on  email  

Page 33: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Exercise:  Offline  conversions  

Page 34: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Exercise:  Offline  conversions  ]  

§  Email  click-­‐through  aner  purchase  §  First  online  login  aner  purchase  §  Unique  website  phone  number  §  Unique  website  promo+on  code  §  Unique  printable  vouchers  §  Store  locator  searches  § Make  an  appointment  online  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   34  

Page 35: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Media  a?ribu.on  phases  ]  §  Phase  1:  De-­‐duplica+on  –  Conversion  de-­‐duplica+on  across  all  channels  –  Requires  one  central  repor+ng  plaoorm  –  Limited  to  first/last  click  aSribu+on  

§  Phase  2:  Direct  response  pathing  –  Response  pathing  across  paid  and  organic  channels  –  Only  covers  clicks  and  not  mere  banner  views  –  Can  be  enabled  in  Google  Analy+cs  and  Omniture  

§  Phase  3:  Full  purchase  path  –  Direct  response  tracking  including  banner  exposure  –  Cannot  be  done  in  Google  Analy+cs  or  Omniture  –  Easier  to  import  addi+onal  channels  into  ad  server  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   35  

Page 36: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Recommended  resources  ]  §  200812  ComScore  How  Online  Adver+sing  Works  §  200905  iProspect  Research  Study  Search  And  Display  §  200902  Forrester  Mul+-­‐Campaign  ASribu+on  §  200904  ClearSaleing  American  ASribu+on  Index  §  201003  Datalicious  Tying  Offline  Sales  To  Online  Media  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   36  

Page 37: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Reducing  waste  ]  

101011010010010010101111010010010101010100001011111001010101010100101011001100010100101001101101001101001010100111001010010010101001001010010100100101001111101010100101001001001010  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   37  

Page 38: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Reducing  waste  along  the  funnel  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   38  

Media  a?ribu.on  

Op.mising  channel  mix  

Tes.ng  Improving  usability  

$$$  

Targe.ng    Increasing  relevance  

Page 39: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Increase  revenue  by  10-­‐20%  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   39  

By  coordina.ng  the  consumer’s  end-­‐to-­‐end  experience,  companies  could  enjoy  revenue  increases  of  10-­‐20%.  

Google:  “get  more  value  from  digital  marke.ng”    or  h?p://bit.ly/cAtSUN  

Source:  McKinsey  Quarterly,  2010  

Page 40: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  The  consumer  data  journey  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   40  

To  reten.on  messages  To  transac.onal  data  

From  suspect  to   To  customer  

From  behavioural  data   From  awareness  messages  

Time  Time  prospect  

Page 41: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Prospect  targe.ng  parameters  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   41  

Page 42: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Coordina.on  across  channels  ]      

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   42  

Off-­‐site  targe.ng  

On-­‐site  targe.ng  

Profile    targe.ng  

Genera.ng  awareness  

Crea.ng  engagement  

Maximising  revenue  

TV,  radio,  print,  outdoor,  search  marke+ng,  display  ads,  performance  networks,  affiliates,  social  media,  etc  

Retail  stores,  call  centers,  brochures,  websites,  landing  pages,  mobile  apps,  online  chat,  etc  

Outbound  calls,  direct  mail,  emails,  SMS,  etc  

Page 43: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Off-­‐site  targe+ng  

On-­‐site  targe+ng  

Profile  targe+ng  

[  Combining  targe.ng  pla^orms  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   43  

Page 44: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

On-­‐site    segments  

Off-­‐site  segments  

[  Combining  technology  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   44  

Page 45: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   45  

Page 46: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   46  

Page 47: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Datalicious  SuperTag  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   47  

§  Central  JavaScript  based  container  tag  § One  tag  for  all  plaoorms  incl.  Omniture  §  Either  hosted  internally  or  externally  §  Faster  tag  implementa+on  and  updates  §  Consistent  network  wide  re-­‐targe+ng  §  Transfer  or  profiling  data  between  sites  §  Iden+fica+on  of  exis+ng  customers  §  Re-­‐targe+ng  by  brand  preferences  

Page 48: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Campaign  response  data  

[  Combining  data  sets  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   48  

Customer  profile  data  

+   The  whole  is  greater    than  the  sum  of  its  parts  

Website  behavioural  data  

Page 49: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Behaviours  plus  transac.ons  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   49  

one-­‐off  collec+on  of  demographical  data    age,  gender,  address,  etc  customer  lifecycle  metrics  and  key  dates  profitability,  expira.on,  etc  predic+ve  models  based  on  data  mining  

propensity  to  buy,  churn,  etc  historical  data  from  previous  transac+ons  

average  order  value,  points,  etc  

CRM  Profile  

UPDATED  OCCASIONALLY  

+  tracking  of  purchase  funnel  stage  

browsing,  checkout,  etc  tracking  of  content  preferences  

products,  brands,  features,  etc  tracking  of  external  campaign  responses  

search  terms,  referrers,  etc  tracking  of  internal  promo+on  responses  

emails,  internal  search,  etc  

Site  Behaviour  

UPDATED  CONTINUOUSLY  

Page 50: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Maximise  iden.fica.on  points  ]  

20%  

40%  

60%  

80%  

100%  

120%  

140%  

160%  

0   4   8   12   16   20   24   28   32   36   40   44   48  

Weeks  

−−−  Probability  of  iden+fica+on  through  Cookies  

August  2010   50  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

Page 51: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Sample  customer  level  data  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   51  

Page 52: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Sample  site  visitor  composi.on  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   52  

30%  exis.ng  customers  with  extensive  profile  including  transac+onal  history  of  which  maybe  50%  can  actually  be  iden+fied  as  individuals    

30%  new  visitors  with  no  previous  website  history  aside  from  campaign  or  referrer  data  of  which  maybe  50%  is  useful  

10%  serious  prospects  with  limited  profile  data  

30%  repeat  visitors  with  referral  data  and  some  website  history  allowing  50%  to  be  segmented  by  content  affinity  

Page 53: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Exercise:  Targe.ng  matrix  

Page 54: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Phase   Segment  A   Segment  B   Channels  

Awareness  

Considera.on  

Purchase  Intent  

Up/Cross-­‐Sell  

[  Exercise:  Targe.ng  matrix  ]  

August  2010   54  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

Page 55: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Phase   Segment  A   Segment  B   Channels  

Awareness   Seen  this?   Social,  display,  search,  etc  

Considera.on   Great  feature!   Social,  search,  website,  etc  

Purchase  Intent   Great  value!   Search,  site,  emails,  etc  

Up/Cross-­‐Sell   Add  this!   Direct  mail,  emails,  etc  

[  Exercise:  Targe.ng  matrix  ]  

August  2010   55  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

Page 56: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Phase   Segment  A   Segment  B   Data  Points  

Awareness   Seen  this?   Default  

Considera.on   Great  feature!   Download,  product  view  

Purchase  Intent   Great  value!   Cart  add,  checkout,  etc  

Up/Cross-­‐Sell   Add  this!   Email  response,  login,  etc  

[  Exercise:  Targe.ng  matrix  ]  

August  2010   56  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

Page 57: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Poten.al  landing  page  layout  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   57  

Branded  header  

Email  or  campaign  message  match  

Targeted  offers  

Passing  data  on  user  preferences  through  to  the  website  via  parameters  in  email  click-­‐through  URLs    to  customise  content  delivery.  

Call  to  ac.on  

Page 58: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Poten.al  newsle?er  layout  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   58  

Closest    stores,    offers    etc  

Rule  based  header  theme  

Data  verifica.on  

Rule  based  offer  

Profile  based  offer  

Using  data  on  website  behaviour  imported  into  the  email  delivery  plaoorm  to  build  business  rules  to  customise  content  delivery.  

NPS  

Page 59: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Affinity  targe.ng  in  ac.on  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   59  

Different  type  of    visitors  respond  to    different  ads.  By  using  category  affinity  targe+ng,    response  rates  are    lined  significantly    across  products.  

Message  CTR  By  Category  Affinity  

Postpay   Prepay   Broadb.   Business  

Blackberry  Bold   - - - + 5GB  Mobile  Broadband   - - + - Blackberry  Storm   + - + + 12  Month  Caps   - + - +

Google:  “vodafone  omniture  case  study”    or  h?p://bit.ly/de70b7  

Page 60: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Avinash  Kaushik:    “The  principle  of  garbage  in,  garbage  out  applies  here.  […]  what  makes  a  behaviour  

targe<ng  pla=orm  <ck,  and  produce  results,  is  not  its  intelligence,  it  is  your  ability  to  actually  feed  it  the  right  content  which  it  can  then  target  […].  You  feed  your  BT  system  crap  and  it  will  quickly  and  efficiently  target  crap  to  your  

customers.  Faster  then  you  could    ever  have  yourself.”  

[  Quality  content  is  key  ]  

August  2010   60  ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

Page 61: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  ClickTale  tes.ng  case  study  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   61  

Page 62: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Bad  campaign  worse  than  none  ]  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   62  

Page 63: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Recommended  resources  ]  §  201003  McKinsey  Get  More  Value  From  Digital  Marke+ng  §  200912  Unbounce  101  Landing  Page  Op+miza+on  Tips  §  201008  eConsultancy  TV  Ad  Landing  Pages  §  200910  eMarketer  Bad  Campaign  Worse  Than  None  §  201003  WebCredible  10  Unexpected  User  Behaviours  §  200910  Myth  Of  The  Page  Fold  §  201008  Sample  Size  Currency  Of  Marke+ng  Tes+ng  §  200409  Roy  Taguchi  Or  MV  Tes+ng  For  Marketers  §  200702  Internet  Retailer  Naviga+ng  Depths  Of  MV  Tes+ng  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   63  

Page 64: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Summary  

Page 65: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Prac.ce  session  ]  

101011010010010010101111010010010101010100001011111001010101010100101011001100010100101001101101001101001010100111001010010010101001001010010100100101001111101010100101001001001010  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   65  

Page 66: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Exercise:  Web  analy.cs  

Page 67: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Web  analy.cs  pla^orm  prac.ce  ]  

§  Google  Analy+cs  and  Omniture  SiteCatalyst  – Plaoorm  basics  and  comparison  – Describing  website  visitors  –  Iden+fying  traffic  sources  (reach)  

§ Campaign  tracking  mechanics  

– Analyzing  content  usage  (engagement)  – Analyzing  conversion  drop-­‐out  (conversion)    – Defining  custom  segments  (funnel  breakdowns)  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   67  

Page 68: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Top  5  Omniture  usage  .ps]  §  Bookmark  interes+ng  reports  and  frequently  used  report  

sevng  right  away  so  they’re  easy  to  find  again  later    §  Use  mul+ple  browser  windows  and  con+nue  browsing  in  

a  new  window  once  you  find  an  interes+ng  report  to  facilitate  comparison  and  data  explora+on  

§  Set  automa+c  email  alerts  for  all  key  metrics  you  come  across  right  away  so  you  are  always  the  first  to  know  about  anomalies  rather  than  the  client  telling  you  

§  Use  short  URLs  next  to  all  graphs  used  in  client  presenta+ons  to  facilitate  naviga+on  to  the  underlying  report  and  to  save  +me  on  poten+al  change  requests  

§  Read  the  ‘200708  Omniture  SiteCatalyst  Report  Descrip+ons’  and  ask  for  the  clients’  Solu+on  Design  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   68  

Page 69: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Describing  website  visitors  ]  

§  Average  connec+on  speed  §  Plug-­‐in  usage  (i.e.  Flash,  etc)  § Mobile  vs.  normal  computers  §  Geographic  loca+on  of  visitors  §  Time  of  day,  day  of  week  §  Repeat  visita+on  § What  else?  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   69  

Page 70: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Iden.fying  traffic  sources  ]  

§  Genera+ng  de-­‐duplicated  reports  §  Campaign  tracking  mechanics  – Google  URL  Builder  and  Omniture  SAINT  

§  Conversion  goals  and  success  events  §  Plus  adding  addi+onal  metrics  §  Paid  vs.  organic  traffic  sources  §  Branded  vs.  generic  search  §  Traffic  quan+ty  vs.  quality  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   70  

Page 71: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Analysing  content  usage  ]  

§  Page  traffic  vs.  engagement  §  Entry  vs.  exit  pages  §  Popular  page  paths  §  Internal  search  terms  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   71  

Page 72: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Analysing  conversion  drop-­‐out  ]  

§  Defining  conversion  funnels  §  Iden+fying  main  problem  pages  §  Pages  visited  aner  conversion  barriers  §  Conversion  drop-­‐out  by  segment  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   72  

Page 73: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

[  Defining  custom  segments  ]  

§  New  vs.  repeat  visitors  §  By  geographic  loca+on  §  By  connec+on  speed  §  By  products  purchased  §  New  vs.  exis+ng  customers  §  Branded  vs.  generic  search  §  By  demographics,  custom  segments  

August  2010   ©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd   73  

Page 74: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

[  Useful  analy.cs  tools  ]  §  hSp://labs.google.com/sets  §  hSp://www.google.com/trends    §  hSp://www.google.com/insights/search  §  hSp://www.google.com/sktool  §  hSp://bit.ly/googlekeywordtoolexternal  §  hSp://www.google.com/webmasters  §  hSp://www.google.com/adplanner  §  hSp://www.google.com/videotarge+ng  §  hSp://www.keywordspy.com    §  hSp://www.compete.com  June  2010   74  

Page 75: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

©  Datalicious  Pty  Ltd  

[  Useful  analy.cs  tools  ]  

§  hSp://bit.ly/hitwisedatacenter    §  hSp://www.socialmen+on.com  §  hSp://twiSersen+ment.appspot.com  §  hSp://bit.ly/twiSerstreamgraphs  §  hSp://twitrratr.com  §  hSp://bit.ly/listonools1    §  hSp://bit.ly/listonools2  §  hSp://manyeyes.alphaworks.ibm.com  §  hSp://www.wordle.net  June  2010   75  

Page 76: Group M Analytics (Part 2)

Contact  me  [email protected]  

 Follow  us  

twiSer.com/datalicious    

Learn  more  blog.datalicious.com