original article - scielo
TRANSCRIPT
1Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Health vulnerability model: conceptual clarifi cation from social subjects’ perspective
Modelo de vulnerabilidade em saúde: esclarecimento conceitual na perspectiva do sujeito-socialModelo de vulnerabilidad en salud: esclarecimiento conceptual en la perspectiva del sujeto social
Raquel Sampaio Florêncio1 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3119-7187
Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira1 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1424-0649
1Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil. Confl icts of interest: nothing to declare.
AbstractObjective: To clarify health vulnerability from the proposition of a conceptual model.
Methods: Concept clarifi cation was applied according to Meleis’ proposal, supported by review and critical refl ection. 101 articles were selected in fi ve databases using the search equation “vulnerability” AND “health”, whose fi ndings were submitted to category and similar analysis. This was processed in the software Iramuteq to identify the essential element, concepts and subconcepts of vulnerability in health - and later construction of a model.
Results: From the review and later stages, health vulnerability was redefi ned and a model was constructed based on the relationship of three components: 1) The social subject, with its concepts and subconcepts; 2) The condition of precariousness and agency; 3) Processes of potentiation or weakening of vulnerability in health. The phenomenon was described, the social subject was identifi ed as an essential element, and the main attributes were known with constitutive and operational defi nitions, making it possible to identify the presence of vulnerability in health.
Conclusion: The concept was clarifi ed through the construction of a model, providing support for the elaboration of research in the health area and future development of medium or long-range theories of the phenomenon of interest.
ResumoObjetivo: Esclarecer a vulnerabilidade em saúde a partir da proposição de um modelo conceitual.
Métodos: Aplicou-se o esclarecimento de conceito segundo proposta de Meleis, subsidiado por revisão e por refl exão crítica. Selecionaram-se 101 artigos em cinco base de dados por meio da equação de busca “vulnerability” AND “health”, cujos achados foram submetidos à análise categorial e de similitude. Essa foi processada no software Iramuteq para identifi cação do elemento essencial, conceitos e subconceitos da vulnerabilidade em saúde - e posterior construção de um modelo.
Resultados: A partir da revisão e etapas posteriores, a vulnerabilidade em saúde foi redefi nida, e foi construído um modelo com base na relação de três componentes: 1) O sujeito-social, com seus conceitos e subconceitos; 2) A condição de precariedade e agenciamento; 3) Processos de potencialização ou fragilização da vulnerabilidade em saúde. O fenômeno foi descrito, identifi cando-se o sujeito-social como elemento essencial, e foram conhecidos os principais atributos com as defi nições constitutivas e operacionais, tornando possível identifi car a presença da vulnerabilidade em saúde.
Conclusão: O conceito foi esclarecido por meio da construção de um modelo, fornecendo subsídios à elaboração de pesquisas na área da saúde e ao futuro desenvolvimento de teorias de médio ou longo alcance do fenômeno de interesse.
KeywordsHealth vulnerability; Pubic Health; Models,
theoretical; Concept formation; Social vulnerability; Health promotion
DescritoresVulnerabilidade em saúde; Saúde pública; Modelos
teóricos; Formação de conceito; Vulnerabilidade social; Promoção da saúde
DescriptoresVulnerabilidad en salud; Salud pública; Modeos
teóricos; Formación de concepto; Social vulnabilidad; Promoción de la salud
SubmittedFebruary 25, 2020
AcceptedOctober 20, 2020
Corresponding authorRaquel Sampaio Florêncio
Email: [email protected]
How to cite: Florêncio RS, Moreira TM. Health vulnerability
model: conceptual clarifi cation from social subjects’ perspective. Acta Paul Enferm.
2021;34:eAPE00353.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.37689/acta-
ape/2021AO00353
Original Article
2 Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Health vulnerability model: conceptual clarification from social subjects’ perspective
Introduction
The term vulnerability, already used for some time in several situations, was incorporated into discourse and practices in the health field, with a view to a more comprehensive reading of complex health and disease processes; therefore, aiding to more effective and comprehensive social responses. It is also em-phasized that the concern with vulnerability found full validity in the health field from the 1980s at the time of the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) epidemic.(1)
Then, the concept of vulnerability in health (VH) was used as a reference for discussions held in the scientific field of various themes and with dif-ferent meanings, whose diversity of applications is due to some situations, especially: the existence of different epistemological orientations; the choice of geographic locations for analysis of the vulnerability process; the direction for specific situations.(2-4)
The term also covers a number of qualifications, the definitions of which have specificities. These conceptions are fostered in several areas of knowl-edge and bring in common the fact that VH is al-ways occurring in the territory where people live.(3) This extended use of concept directs paths and perspectives to ambiguities and contradictions,(1,4) requesting new or complementary definitions and reflections about the concept, which is broad, com-plex and subjective.(5)
In a critical analysis of VH frameworks, it was noticed that the more used conceptual frame-works(4,6) do not bring definitions of the elements related to concepts and subconcepts, making it nec-essary to contribute to the construction of a the-
oretical framework on the subject and to provide the development of a conceptual model for identi-fication, assessment, and intervention in situations of vulnerability by health professionals. It is known that it was not the authors’ objective(4,6) to construct a theory about VH, but to think about concept, bringing it closer and linking it to health promotion and, in the case of the Brazilian reference, consider-ing principles of hermeneutics. Thus, their previous writings provided a basis for the construction of a conceptual model of VH by indicating how other concepts could be articulated.
For these authors,(4,6) VH comprises the ethical perspective of different degrees and natures of sus-ceptibility of individuals and collectivities that lead them to suffering, illness/injury and finitude, accord-ing to particularities formed by a set of social, pro-grammatic and individual aspects, which put them in relation to the problem and with the resources to cope with them. From this definition and its uses, it is understood that there is an open field to rethink, redefine and propose ways of using VH.
Defining, clarifying, assessing, operationaliz-ing and submitting concepts to theoretical and empirical assessments are essential and vital pro-cesses in advancement of knowledge. Concept de-velopment(7) presents five levels: exploration, clari-fication, analysis, and integrated approach. In this study, the second level is brought, because the con-cept of VH already exists, but it is not understand-able in publications, because several meanings are pointed out with contradictions regarding the orig-inal frameworks. Thus, this study aimed ‘to clarify health vulnerability from the proposition of a con-ceptual model’.
ResumenObjetivo: Esclarecer la vulnerabilidad en salud a partir de la proposición de un modelo conceptual.
Métodos: Se aplicó el esclarecimiento de concepto según la propuesta de Meleis, respaldado con revisión y reflexión crítica. Se seleccionaron 101 artículos en cinco bases de datos por medio de la ecuación de búsqueda “vulnerability” AND “health”, cuyos resultados fueron sometidos al análisis categorial y de similitud. Este fue procesado con el software Iramuteq para la identificación del elemento esencial, conceptos y subconceptos de la vulnerabilidad en salud y la posterior construcción de un modelo.
Resultados: A partir de la revisión y etapas posteriores, la vulnerabilidad en salud fue redefinida y se construyó un modelo basado en la relación de tres componentes: 1) El sujeto social, con sus conceptos y subconceptos, 2) La condición de precariedad y gestión, 3) Procesos de potencialización o debilitamiento de la vulnerabilidad en salud. El fenómeno se describió con la identificación del sujeto social como elemento esencial y se conocieron los principales atributos con las definiciones constitutivas y operativas, lo que permitió identificar la presencia de la vulnerabilidad en salud.
Conclusión: El concepto fue esclarecido mediante la construcción de un modelo y respalda la elaboración de estudios en el área de la salud y el desarrollo futuro de teorías de medio o largo alcance del fenómeno de interés.
3Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Florêncio RS, Moreira TM
Methods
The study was designed considering the adapt-ed stages of conceptual clarification according to Meleis(7) in conjunction with a review(8,9) and its subsequent update.
As a way to carry out the research, the main questions to be answered were established in cor-respondence with the methodological framework phases. It is reiterated that for this study phases two to five were considered, where the first was devel-oped in a previous study.(8,9)
Soon after defining the questions, articles published in the Latin American & Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), Spanish Bibliographic Index of Health Sciences (IBECS), Nursing Database (BDENF - Base de Dados de Enfermagem), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases and in the PubMed portal were searched. “Vulnerability” AND “health” were the keywords contained in the search equation to search for publications. This equation was used at all times of collection and in all sources. The final search took place in December 2019, with the update of the original study.
Articles containing the term ‘vulnerability’ in their title, with no date limit, electronically avail-able in full were included. Studies without explicit definition of VH, with gray literature, theoretical, case and review studies were excluded.(8)
The search was performed by two researchers, and studies were selected carried out from a thor-ough reading of titles and abstracts so that those who met the mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria were for final selection. From the search equation, 27,035 publications were found, of which 26,934 did not meet the criteria: 7,873 due to duplications; 15,083 because they did not have vulnerability in the title; 1,819 because they had no full text; 316 because they did not have explicit definition of VH; 1,572 because they did not approach VH; 271 be-cause they were gray literature. Of this total, 101 articles were selected for full reading and analysis (Chart 1).
According to the aspects of an observation script, the publications and data of the 101 articles were
interpreted, organized and synthesized through a synoptic table with the description of author, theme, journal, year, type of study, and place.(8)
Chart 1. Correspondence between the phases of conceptual clarification and the guiding questions of the studyClarification phase Guiding question
1 - Description of phenomenon inherent to concept(8,9)
What are the characteristics of the studies that have been published on the theme?(8) What are the meanings and uses of health vulnerability described by studies?(9)
2 - Systematization of observations and descriptions of the phenomenon
What are the essential elements of the concept of VH?What are the processes or situations produced by the vulnerability?
3 - Development of constitutive and operational definitions, asking themselves and others: How will I know the concept when I ‘see it’?
What characteristics/attributes are indicated as referring to the concept and contribute to its recognition?
4 - Model construction What is the relationship between the concepts and subconcepts that allow the construction of a conceptual model that clarifies VH?
5 - Assumption development
Initially, analyzed categories were constructed based on descriptive statistics to quantify the gen-eral and methodological aspects of the publications. Subsequently, the definitions of VH and the main results of the articles were identified. From a thor-ough reading, critical analyses were performed and the definitions of VH were extracted, which consti-tuted the main corpus of the study. The Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires (IRAMUTEQ) was used to help in the similitude analysis phase, with the aim of identifying the essential elements of VH from the definitions.
Regarding the inspirations of the concept, these have already been contemplated on other occasions.(4,6) Furthermore, in this study, it was assumed that the VH phenomenon has no antecedents that trigger it, because it is not a cause and effect. Thus, constitutive and operational elements (related to the essential el-ement, concepts and sub-concepts) were defined to allow to identify VH at the time of its presence, as well as the situations produced by VH. For that, the articles were kept, and after extracting the main clip-pings of the results, these were categorized by similar keywords and recategorized until they resulted in at-tributes, their definitions and production involved in VH (precariousness or agency).
Attributes are words or expressions that appear repeatedly in the literature, that show the essence of
4 Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Health vulnerability model: conceptual clarifi cation from social subjects’ perspective
the concept. Th ey constitute characteristics that ex-press the concept, which act as diff erential elements to discriminate what is and what is not the presence of a concept. When it is very abstract, its attributes also have a high degree of abstraction. Constitutive defi nition is conceived in terms of concepts prop-er to the theory in which it is inserted. Finally, the defi nition is operational when there is a defi nition, no longer in terms of other concepts, but in terms of concrete operations, i.e., of behaviors, attitudes or sensations by which the construct is expressed.(7,10)
Th us, the construction of the VH conceptu-al model began. It was developed by critically re-fl ecting on the results of the previous stages, and the essential elements, their concepts and related sub-concepts were given visibility, as well as the product of these relationships and their articula-tions. Finally, this process had three stages: theoreti-cal construction (performed in all previous stages of clarifi cation), model design (using artistic resources: graphic design with elements of music), its explana-tion, and refl ection.
Results
For the phase of systematization of the observa-tions and descriptions of the phenomenon, fi gure 1 was arrived at, which showed that, at fi rst, the essential elements of the concept were constitut-ed of the individual and the social. However, af-ter refl ective analysis, it was interpreted as subject and social.
To contextualize these fi ndings, it was under-stood that these essential elements correspond to VH attributes/characteristics, which are support-ed by other concepts and subconcepts. From the previous tables, there was recategorization, being assigned a constitutive and operational defi nition to facilitate the understanding of how to identify situations of VH (Appendix 1). Some remained as previously thought, others were grouped and others modifi ed.
Chart 2 represents a synthesis of the concepts and sub-concepts that make up the essential ele-ments of VH and their defi nitions.
Figure 1. Essential elements of the concept of vulnerability according to the review
In addition to the need to present these defi -nitions, it was understood that there would be an answer in the experience of these aspects that could produce precarious conditions or agency. In studies that point to precariousness, it has diff erent scenari-os and violence is an expressive condition discussed. But there is the possibility of changing the direction of these processes, and the agency is responsible for this. Several aspects favored this condition such as support networks, coping, refl ections, spirituality, positive feelings and health promotion practices.
Th us, based on the articulation and refl ection of the elements of the review, VH was understood as a condition of human life expressed in all its dimen-sions from (re)arrangements of the power relations that constitute the social-subject, producing precar-iousness when agency movements are not potenti-ated for health promotion.
Furthermore, in fi gure 2, it was possible to ob-serve the main components of the VH conceptu-al model and its relationship, rescuing: 1) Social-subject, with its concepts and sub-concepts; 2) Condition of precariousness and agency; 3) VH potentiation or fragility processes.
Figure 2 shows a relationship between the sub-ject and social elements, with their main concepts, in an intimate relationship, which, together with precariousness and agency, confi gure VH processes. Th ese take on various nuances and reconfi gure VH again, in a continuum of diverse movements and in multiplicities resulting from the tensions produced in the relations between social subjects, its essential element.
5Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Florêncio RS, Moreira TM
Discussion
Reference authors(4,6) considered that VH consist-ed of two dimensions (individual and contextu-al) and three dimensions (individual, social, and programmatic). Based on the results presented by IRAMUTEQ, from the similitude analysis, the structure, the central nucleus and the peripheral system of the interpretation of VH were identi-fi ed, in which the two major organizing axes are the individual and the social. Th ese elements un-derwent a critical analysis, i.e., approximation of the content with subject ideas by Michel Foucault and Judith Butler, where the individual became the subject’s dimension and the social remained as such, according to the analytical categories of the articles.
Th is adaptation occurred, because it is understood that subjects are a product of power relations, they are formed and constituted by them, not their producers. Th ere is no essential subject who would be alienated by ideologies, by power relations that would cover up their view of reality.(11-15) If we think that subjects are always in this movement, it would be controversial to call them individuals, as this term denotes disconnec-tion. When we think about power, we think about relationship. If at the same time it prohibits and in-duces, censors and produces (discourses, truths, and realities), if it aff ects and is aff ected, we can understand that power only exists in the relationship, power is by nature relational, it is a power in motion.(11-15)
Th us, characterized the essential elements separately, which were later understood as social subjects, we went in search of their concepts and sub-concepts as a way to identify VH when it hap-pens. Th ese stimulate refl ection on power relations as hegemonic eff ects of continuously sustained stra-tegic positions and coping, understood as coping with social forces in constant antagonism to the established strategic positions. Th ey are articulat-ed according to their operational defi nitions that demonstrate how VH situations may be being ex-perienced and produced.
In understanding VH, the power relationship between the subject and the social is an open fi eld
Chart 2. Defi nitions of the essential elements and their concepts and subconcepts of VHSubject
Human life constituted from intersubjective relationships, where there is room for the manifestation of freedom in the tension between knowledge and power and for possibilities of re-creation of one’s own in the fi eld of health.
Functional literacy Learning, Cognition, Knowledge, Schooling
Behavior Attitude, Self-Care, Lifestyle, Work Practices, Routine and Daily Life, Communication
Interpersonal relationships Family relationships, Friendship relationships, Working relationships, Affective-sexual relationships
Psycho-emotional situation Self-Esteem, Acceptance, Concentration, Beliefs, Desires, Sexual Orientation, Mental Health, Perceptions, Feelings, Values
Physical situation Age, Gender, Race/color, Physical aspects related to work, Impact of illness at work, Health-disease situation
SocialAppearance scene that presupposes the different forms of the subject interacting with other lives or institutions in the health fi eld; it is the space of expressing oneself, of recognizing oneself and of
recognition by and with the other.
Socioeconomic factors Material Goods, Housing, Income, Social Class, Work, Education
Demographic identity Ethnicity, Origin, Migration
Culture Cultural formation, Social constructions, Cultural differences, Popular knowledge
Family context Marital/family status, Characteristics of members, Family types
Social networks and media Social support
Gender Gender inequality, Traditional roles, Male chauvinism
Violence Discrimination, Sexual violence, Physical violence, Verbal violence, Psychological violence
Social control Social participation
Ecosystem Waste, Environment, Climate
Access to fundamental rights First, second, third and fourth generations fundamental rights
Programmatic situation - emphasis on health Infrastructure, Work Process
Status Public Policies, Financing
Figure 2. Conceptual model of health vulnerability
6 Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Health vulnerability model: conceptual clarification from social subjects’ perspective
of responses, reactions, results, and possible inven-tions. Thus, it is understood that there is a response that can produce conditions of precariousness or agency.
The precarious condition can take different forms, from the beginning, maintenance or com-plication of a disease, to, for example, affecting the quality of life and mental health. Moreover, it can be configured in a sphere of social inequities, pro-duction of power relations that represent the pre-carious condition. The conceptions of an important author about precariousness(12-14) refer the term to a politically constructed condition whereby certain populations are asymmetrically exposed to contexts of violence, danger, illness, forced migration, pov-erty, or death. As a process and movement, precar-iousness reinforces VH situations and vice versa, as many lives are not considered lives by the State or groups of greater political and economic power.
In the midst of this precariousness, subjects can obtain means to raise awareness of submission to the orders of power and resist VH through agen-cy. Therefore, there is a seizure of control over life that reverberates in the condition of VH, as there is the possibility of movement of relationships to-wards a better condition of health and life, i.e., less vulnerability. Despite the precariousness of making and producing subjects invisible to public health policies, this concept of subject, for Butler, makes possible the condition of the agency, understood as power, capacity for action, as it is productive for the compression of social action, especially subordinate subjects to a hegemonic social order. Butler charac-terizes the agency as a practice of articulation and reframing the power to do.(12,14)
The aforementioned conscience generates the conditions of resistance and reflexivity, allowing social subjects to oppose the abuses of normalizing power that limits and controls the desires of their own possibility, producing agency.(15) They are not an exclusively individual characteristic, but are em-bodied in the social context, promoting health and living lives. Subjects are performative, i.e., a ritual-ized production, a ritual reiteration of norms, but that do not totally determine it. This incomplete-ness enables the process of rupture and the regis-
tration of new meanings and, consequently, the change in practices and contexts.(12,15) That is, so-cial-subjects resist not to be in a condition of VH or not to perpetuate it; they find the potential to reframe norms, discourses, experiences, experiences and social practices.(15)
Thus, there is a need for intersectorality to be in the field of health care, since vulnerability is a construct that occurs in relationships with dif-ferent people and in/over/with different spaces. Considering these aspects, health promotion and life production are an important background in the discussions about VH. The first inspirations for the development of the VH concept came from the need to think about health promotion and not just prevention, with intersectorality implicit, not ad-dressing a specific disease or disorder, but the pro-duction of life.(4,12,16-18)
Based on all these elements discussed, a (re)definition of the concept of VH was constructed. It is the starting point for thinking about a represen-tation of the conceptual model, a complex phase, since the essential elements of VH are neither hi-erarchical nor dissociated, it has diverse, intercon-nected, multiple elements. Each has its characteris-tic, concepts and sub-concepts, but they only exist in the presence of the other, at the same time that their characteristics can be confused. It is a social subject and a social subject. What is in between is difficult to represent and this transition is almost imperceptible.
According to authors,(4) people are not vulner-able, they are always vulnerable to something, in some degree and form and at a certain point in time and space. However, it is believed that the subject or groups experience processes or are in a condition of VH. Adjective and objectification are not sought, but relationships, and the use of the term vulnera-ble should therefore be rethought.(19) Furthermore, some authors(20) use the term ‘marker’ when they want to characterize any attribute or situation of VH. However, it denotes a fixed, marked, difficult to transform, i.e., non-situational situation.
Unlike theories, conceptual models repre-sent a concept analogically. In this sense, there are advances in studies in this perspective, in
7Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Florêncio RS, Moreira TM
which theoretical essays on VH are identified in the literature, as well as their applicability in the construction of instruments/scales.(2,20-24) So, to account for the clarification framework, a way of presenting the concept was produced. Analogously, when one think of a song and its musical notes, they don’t know where one ends and the next begins when they listen to them. In this case, the human senses cannot reach the pas-sage from one to another. Thus, a figure was con-structed that represents VH in this perspective of the interplay and the power relations.
In this analogy to musical elements, social sub-jects make up a set of musical notes. These make up a melody, VH, which has harmonic variations. Rescuing these concepts to VH, these variations can be translated into a continuum of precarious or agency conditions. These productions are the result of the relationship between the notes, i.e., interaction between the elements of the concept, established by power relations in the production of health. The precarious conditions enhance the vul-nerability processes, while the agency weakens it, transforming them. Lives then resist, recreate and (re)become visible and livable.
So, when there is movement, there is power and it does not weigh only with the strength that says no or has precariousness as a product, but it also permeates, produces things, induces pleasure, forms knowledge, produces speech, i.e., produces power-ful lives, resistant in agency processes.(11)
Figure 2 represents the conceptual model of VH from the perspective of the multiple possi-bilities of music that can be produced. Musical notes are each of the concepts and sub-concepts of the essential element, where the different shades of blue are configured, while the subject and the shades of green, the social. These are in relation, shown by the dotted lines, which define the non-permanent or almost “fixed” character of that interaction and which can change each time they come into contact with other notes. The an-swer of this power relationship is (re)arrangement of the notes in a score, configuring the melody of the agency, defining a fragility of VH (‘decrease’), or the melody of the precariousness, potentiating
VH (‘increase’), conforming the several music possibilities called VH.
The dotted lines in the precariousness speak of the fragility and inequality of the relationships between the elements, resulting in processes of po-tentiation of VH. However, with the possibility of change to transform these situations. The continu-ous lines refer to stronger relationships, in the sense of having a higher quality of these and that reinforce the promotion of health, simultaneously or after the processes of fragility of VH. Relationships that have arisen from precariousness or agency can also be re-organized, giving way to other power relationships and other VH processes and other responses; this phenomenon can occur in sequence or at the same time, which characterizes and ratifies VH as a di-verse, dynamic and multiple phenomenon.
Conclusion
The proposed conceptual model clarifies the con-cept of VH, because its components are defined and related in analogy to music. In addition to the de-scription of the phenomenon and identification of the essential element, it was possible to know the main attributes (concepts and subconcepts) of so-cial subjects, so that it could be conjecture when VH was present and producing precariousness in a given situation or agency. The model provides sup-port for the development of research in health and the future development of medium or long-range theories of VH. The proposed model is another step to boost the concept and stimulate the coherent use of the concept by researchers and health profession-als, taking it as what it is, a condition of human life from social subjects’ perspective.
Acknowledgments
We would like to than the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) for granting the doctoral scholar-ship for RSF.
8 Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Health vulnerability model: conceptual clarification from social subjects’ perspective
Collaborations
Florêncio RS and Moreira TMM declare that they contributed to the conception of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, writing of the article and approval of the final version to be published.
References
1. Oviedo RA, Czeresnia D. O conceito de vulnerabilidade e seu caráter biossocial. Interface (Botucatu). 2015;19(53):237-250.
2. Schumann LR, Moura LB. Vulnerability synthetic indices: a literature integrative review. Ciênc saúde coletiva. 2015;20(7):2105-20.
3. Feitosa MZ, Sousa LC, Paz AF, Barreto EH, Bomfim ZÁ. Afetividade, território e vulnerabilidade na relação pessoa-ambiente: um olhar ético político. Fractal. Rev Psicol. 2018;30(2):196–203.
4. Ayres JR, Calazans GJ, Saletti Filho HC, França Júnior I. Risco, vulnerabilidade e práticas de prevenção e promoção da saúde. In: Campos GW, Minayo MC, Akerman M, Drumont Júnior M, Carvalho YM, organizadores. Tratado de saúde coletiva. 2a ed. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2012.
5. Barbosa KT, Oliveira FM, Fernandes MD. Vulnerability of the elderly: a conceptual analysis. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72 Suppl 2:337–44.
6. Mann J, Tarantola DJ, Netter TW. Aids in the word. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1992.
7. Meleis AI. Theoretical nursing: development and progress. 5th ed. Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
8. Florêncio RS, Moreira TM, Pessoa VL, Cestari VR, Silva VM, Rabelo SM, et al. Mapping studies on vulnerability in health: a scoping review. Research, Society and Development. 2020;9(10):e2079108393.
9. Florêncio RS. Vulnerabilidade em saúde: uma clarificação conceitual [tese]. Fortaleza: Universidade Estadual do Ceará; 2018.
10. Pasquali L. Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2003.
11. Foucault M. Microfísica do poder. Rio de Janeiro: Graal; 2011. 295 p.
12. Butler J. Frames of War. When is life grievable. New York: Verso; 2009.
13. Butler J. Vida precária. Contemporânea: Rev Sociol UFSCar. 2011;1:13–33.
14. Butler J. Cambio del sujeto: La política de la resignificación radical de Judith Butler. Casale R, Chiachio C., organizadores. Máscaras del deseo: una lectura del deseo en Judith Butler. Buenos Aires: Catálogos; 2009. pp. 65–111.
15. Butler J. Mecanismos psíquicos del poder: teorías sobre la sujeción. 2a ed. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra; 2010.
16. Silva Júnior JB. Health promotion: necessary and urgent action in the Americas [editorial]. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2019;24(11):3994.
17. Sonaglio RG, Lumertz J, Melo RC, Rocha CM. Promoção da saúde: revisão integrativa sobre conceitos e experiências no Brasil. J Nurs Health. 2019;9(3):e199301.
18. Vieira LS, Belisário SA. Intersectoriality in the promotion of school in health: a study of the Health in School Program. Saúde Debate 2018;42(Spe 4):120-33.
19. Chaves SE, Ratto CG. Fronteiras da formação em saúde: notas sobre a potência da vulnerabilidade. Interface (Botucatu). 2018;22(64):189-98.
20. Padoveze MC, Juskevicius LF, Santos TR, Nichiata LI, Ciosak SI, Bertolozzi MR. The concept of vulnerability applied to Healthcare-associated Infections. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(1):299–303.
21. de Groot N, Bonsel GJ, Birnie E, Valentine NB. Towards a universal concept of vulnerability: broadening the evidence from the elderly to perinatal health using a Delphi approach. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212633.
22. Cestari VR, Moreira TM, Pessoa VL, Florêncio RS, Silva MR, Torres RA. The essence of care in health vulnerability: a Heideggerian construction. Rev Bras Enferm. 2017;70(5):1112–6.
23. Jesus IT, Orlandi AA, Grazziano ES, Zazzetta MS. Frailty of the socially vulnerable elderly. Acta Paul Enferm. 2017;30(6):614–20.
24. Maffacciolli R, Oliveira DL. Challenges and perspectives of nursing care to vulnerable populations. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2018;39:e20170189.
9Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Florêncio RS, Moreira TM
Appe
ndix
1. C
onst
itutiv
e an
d op
erat
iona
l defi
nitio
ns o
f the
con
cept
s an
d su
bcon
cept
s of
the
esse
ntia
l ele
men
ts o
f hea
lth v
ulne
rabi
lity
SUBJ
ECT
Conc
ept/C
onst
ituen
t Defi
nitio
nSu
bcon
cept
/Con
stitu
ent d
efini
tion
Oper
atio
nal d
efini
tion
Func
tiona
l lite
racy
: The
kno
wle
dge
and
com
pete
ncie
s of
the
subj
ects
to
acce
ss, u
nder
stan
d, a
sses
s an
d ap
ply
gene
ral i
nfor
mat
ion,
in o
rder
to m
ake
judg
men
ts a
nd m
ake
deci
sion
s in
th
e da
y-to
-day
inco
rpor
ated
thro
ugh
lear
ning
, cog
nitio
n, k
now
ledg
e an
d sc
hool
ing.
Lear
ning
: Pro
cess
of a
cqui
ring
new
info
rmat
ion
rela
ted
to v
ario
us a
spec
ts.
Low
sym
bolic
and
ling
uist
ic c
apita
l of p
eopl
e, le
arni
ng d
ifficu
lties
.
Cogn
ition
: Men
tal c
apac
ity o
r com
pete
nce
nece
ssar
y to
pro
cess
and
sei
ze in
form
atio
n, to
th
ink,
rem
embe
r, re
ad, p
erce
ive a
nd s
olve
pro
blem
s.De
crea
sed
cogn
ition
in s
peci
fic c
onte
xts,
inte
llect
ual d
isab
ility,
forg
etfu
lnes
s, d
ifficu
lties
in u
nder
stan
ding
the
inte
ract
ions
that
occ
ur
in h
ealth
cen
ters
, diffi
culti
es in
und
erst
andi
ng c
are,
lack
of u
nder
stan
ding
, ina
bilit
y to
und
erst
and
wha
t is
happ
enin
g to
them
, lac
k of
in
form
atio
n el
abor
atio
n an
d its
pra
ctic
al a
pplic
atio
n, n
ot u
nder
stan
ding
vio
lenc
e, n
ot u
nder
stan
ding
the
need
for t
reat
men
t.
Know
ledg
e: W
hat t
he s
ubje
ct k
now
s ab
out s
omet
hing
or e
ven
a se
t of i
nfor
mat
ion
stor
ed
thro
ugh
expe
rienc
e or
lear
ning
. It i
s co
gniti
ve a
bilit
y th
at a
llow
s ap
prop
riate
judg
men
ts a
nd
deci
sion
-mak
ing
or n
ot in
the
face
of a
situ
atio
n.
Lack
of i
nfor
mat
ion
abou
t the
dis
ease
, non
-rec
ogni
tion
of d
iffer
ence
s in
pre
vious
hea
lth c
ondi
tions
, non
-aw
aren
ess
of ri
sk, n
on-
awar
enes
s of
righ
ts a
nd re
spon
sibi
litie
s, o
ther
issu
es th
at c
once
rn p
opul
ar k
now
ledg
e an
d fo
rmal
kno
wle
dge.
Educ
atio
n: It
is th
e pe
riod
of e
duca
tion,
stu
dy o
r lea
rnin
g of
sub
ject
s in
sch
ool.
Low
edu
catio
n.
Beha
vior
: The
act
ions
of t
he s
ubje
cts
in re
latio
n to
thei
r soc
ial e
nviro
nmen
t, re
late
d to
atti
tude
, car
e or
oth
ers,
ca
re p
ract
ices
and
wor
k, ro
utin
e an
d da
ily li
fe o
r way
of b
eing
and
co
mm
unic
atio
n.
Attit
ude:
It is
a le
arne
d/ac
quire
d pr
edis
posi
tion
to re
spon
d co
nsis
tent
ly to
a s
ocia
l sce
ne.
Nega
tive
attit
ude
abou
t the
wor
k sc
enar
io, n
on-u
se o
f pre
vent
ion
mat
eria
l, at
titud
e of
pas
sivit
y of
wom
en in
rela
tion
to th
eir
indi
vidua
l pro
tect
ion,
with
draw
al fr
om re
turn
ing
to th
e he
alth
ser
vice,
see
king
to s
olve
thei
r pro
blem
s us
ing
only
third
par
ties
and
hom
e pr
actic
es, n
ot s
eeki
ng a
dequ
ate
care
, not
see
king
hea
lth s
ervic
e, re
sign
atio
n, n
ot re
adin
ess
for c
hang
e.
Self-
care
: Dec
isio
n-m
akin
g pr
oces
s th
at in
volve
s th
e ch
oice
and
exe
cutio
n of
beh
avio
rs fo
r th
e he
alth
of t
he s
ubje
ct h
imse
lf, p
erfo
rmed
by
him
, aris
ing
from
his
ow
n be
lief o
r fro
m th
e in
dica
tion
of s
ome
heal
th p
rofe
ssio
nal.
Actio
ns o
f acc
ess
to d
rug
and
non-
drug
trea
tmen
t irre
gula
r or a
bsen
t, fin
anci
al d
ifficu
lties
for t
reat
men
t ade
fore
go, d
isco
ntin
uity
of
treat
men
t, no
n-ad
optio
n of
sel
f-ca
re. H
ealth
and
risk
pro
mot
ion
prac
tices
, abs
ent o
r defi
cien
t pre
vent
ion
stra
tegi
es, v
ario
us h
ealth
be
havio
rs.
Life
styl
e: W
ay o
f livi
ng th
at c
hara
cter
izes
the
subj
ect,
invo
lving
the
adop
tion
of h
ealth
y at
titud
es a
nd b
ehav
iors
or n
ot.
Unhe
alth
y fo
od a
nd p
urch
ase,
abs
ent o
r ins
uffic
ient
leis
ure
activ
ity, a
bsen
t or i
nsuf
ficie
nt p
hysi
cal a
ctivi
ty, e
xces
sive
cof
fee
inta
ke, i
rregu
lar h
untin
g an
d fis
hing
, im
prop
er c
olle
ctio
n an
d us
e of
nat
ural
pro
duct
s, u
se o
f lic
it an
d illi
cit d
rugs
, stre
ss, f
ragi
le
rela
tions
hips
, sle
ep p
robl
ems,
inst
rosp
ectio
n.
Wor
king
pra
ctic
es: A
ny a
ctio
n ta
ken
with
in th
e sc
ope
of th
e w
ork.
Unsa
tisfa
ctor
y or
unp
rodu
ctive
wor
k pe
rform
ance
and
wor
k ta
sks.
Rout
ine
and
ever
yday
life
: Sys
tem
atic
way
thro
ugh
whi
ch d
ay-t
o-da
y ac
tiviti
es a
re c
arrie
d ou
t.Di
srup
tion
of d
aily
life,
dai
ly de
nsity
, rou
tine
impa
ired
by d
isea
se, g
ener
al ro
utin
e, d
aily
chal
leng
es, c
usto
ms
and
habi
ts o
f pre
vent
ion
and
risk.
Com
mun
icat
ion:
Ver
bal o
r bod
ily a
ctio
n of
a s
ubje
ct th
at s
igna
ls in
form
atio
n to
ano
ther
or
othe
r sub
ject
s.Co
mm
unic
atio
n di
fficu
lties
, com
mun
icat
ion
barri
ers,
inef
fect
ive c
omm
unic
atio
n, c
reat
ion
of a
dis
tinct
ion
betw
een
peop
le d
ue to
the
lang
uage
use
d.
Inte
rper
sona
l rel
atio
nshi
ps:
Inte
ract
ion
betw
een
subj
ects
who
co
mm
unic
ate
verb
ally
or n
on-v
erba
lly,
in a
mov
emen
t of r
espo
nses
to
certa
in ty
pes
of p
ower
in s
ituat
ions
in
the
fam
ily, a
t wor
k, in
frie
ndsh
ip a
nd
in a
ffect
ive-s
exua
l life
.
Fam
ily re
latio
ns: B
ehav
iora
l, ps
ycho
logi
cal a
nd s
ocia
l int
erac
tions
bet
wee
n th
e va
rious
fa
mily
mem
bers
.Fa
mily
reje
ctio
n, c
ondi
tions
of s
peci
fic fa
mily
rela
tions
hip,
vio
lent
fam
ily re
latio
nshi
p, la
ck o
f fam
ily a
nd s
choo
l rel
atio
nshi
p, d
ifficu
lty
in re
porti
ng s
exua
l cho
ice
to s
omeo
ne in
the
fam
ily, c
onfli
ctin
g fa
mily
rela
tions
hips
, fam
ily re
latio
nshi
ps w
ith a
spec
ts o
f hos
tility
and
di
squa
lifica
tion,
fam
ily re
sist
ance
in th
e or
gani
zatio
n of
dai
ly lif
e ar
ound
chr
onic
con
ditio
ns, f
ragi
le fa
mily
bon
d, la
ck o
f dia
logu
e in
th
e fa
mily
, lac
k of
trus
t in
fam
ily m
embe
rs ,
finan
cial
abu
se, p
hysi
cal a
nd s
exua
l abu
se, v
erba
l abu
se, t
hrea
ts fe
lt, fa
mily
exp
ress
ions
of
dai
ly di
fficu
lties
resu
lting
from
chr
onic
hea
lth c
ondi
tions
, fam
ily n
egle
ct.
Frie
ndsh
ip re
latio
nshi
ps: B
ehav
iora
l, ps
ycho
logi
cal a
nd s
ocia
l int
erac
tions
bet
wee
n fri
ends
.Lo
ss o
f con
tact
with
frie
nds
who
live
nea
r the
hou
se, r
emov
al o
f frie
nds
due
to il
lnes
s.
Wor
king
rela
tions
hips
: Beh
avio
ral,
psyc
holo
gica
l and
soc
ial i
nter
actio
ns b
etw
een
mem
bers
of a
wor
k co
ntex
t.Ex
cess
ive a
ffect
ive b
urde
n on
wor
k re
latio
nshi
ps, i
neffe
ctive
inte
rpro
fess
iona
l rel
atio
nshi
ps, a
busi
ve re
latio
nshi
ps a
t wor
k (s
exua
l ha
rass
men
t).
Affe
ctiv
e-se
xual
rela
tions
: Beh
avio
ral,
psyc
holo
gica
l and
soc
ial i
nter
actio
ns b
etw
een
subj
ects
in a
rela
tions
hip
of c
onst
ruct
ion
of a
ffect
ion,
sex
ual o
r not
.Fr
agile
inte
rsub
ject
ive re
latio
nshi
ps, n
ot ‘b
eing
with
’, no
t find
ing
othe
rs a
s hu
man
bei
ngs,
dis
tanc
ing
peop
le a
fter a
dis
ease
, ref
usal
of
the
partn
er to
use
con
dom
s, p
erfo
rmin
g se
x w
ithou
t a c
ondo
m a
fter c
oerc
ion,
hom
osex
ual r
elat
ions
hips
, ins
tabi
lity
of m
an-w
oman
re
latio
nshi
ps, c
omm
erci
al s
exua
l rel
atio
nshi
p, tr
ust i
n th
e pa
rtner
as
a ju
stifi
catio
n fo
r non
-pre
vent
ion,
con
flict
ing
affe
ctive
bon
ds.
Cont
inue
...
10 Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Health vulnerability model: conceptual clarification from social subjects’ perspective
SUBJ
ECT
Conc
ept/C
onst
ituen
t Defi
nitio
nSu
bcon
cept
/Con
stitu
ent d
efini
tion
Oper
atio
nal d
efini
tion
Psyc
ho-e
mot
iona
l situ
atio
n: A
co
nditi
on o
f sub
ject
ive e
xper
ienc
e in
a s
peci
fic c
onte
xt th
at in
volve
s fro
m s
elf-
este
em, a
ccep
tanc
e,
conc
entra
tion,
bel
iefs
, des
ires,
sex
ual
orie
ntat
ion,
feel
ings
, wel
l-bei
ng,
perc
eptio
ns, d
esire
s, v
alue
s to
men
tal
heal
th in
gen
eral
.
Self-
este
em: S
atis
fact
ion
with
one
’s w
ay o
f bei
ng, t
hink
ing
or w
ith p
hysi
cal a
ppea
ranc
e,
expr
essi
ng c
onfid
ence
in th
eir a
ctio
ns a
nd o
pini
ons.
Decr
ease
d se
lf-es
teem
, low
sel
f-es
teem
due
to la
ck o
f pro
fess
iona
l kno
wle
dge,
loss
of s
elf-
este
em.
Acce
ptan
ce: R
ecog
nitio
n of
the
need
to h
ave
an a
ttitu
de in
the
face
of a
n un
expe
cted
, un
wan
ted
stat
e of
hea
lth o
r its
con
sequ
ence
s.No
n-ac
cept
ance
of t
reat
men
t, no
n-ac
cept
ance
of t
he d
isea
se, n
on-a
ccep
tanc
e of
pre
gnan
cy, n
on-a
ccep
tanc
e of
a h
ealth
or l
ife
cond
ition
.
Focu
s: A
bilit
y to
dire
ct a
ttent
ion
and
thou
ght t
o a
spec
ific
idea
, sub
ject
, or a
ctio
n.Di
fficu
lty c
once
ntra
ting,
inab
ility
to c
once
ntra
te.
Belie
fs: W
hat i
s co
nsid
ered
true
, i.e
., be
lievin
g in
the
truth
or t
he p
ossi
bilit
y of
som
ethi
ng.
Belie
f in
the
safe
ty o
f mis
guid
ed p
reve
ntio
n eq
uipm
ent,
belie
fs a
bout
mis
guid
ed p
reve
ntio
n pr
actic
es, d
isbe
lief i
n pr
even
tion
mat
eria
l, di
sbel
ief t
hat w
ill un
derg
o he
alth
cha
nge,
mis
take
n be
lief i
n th
e tra
nsm
issi
ble
char
acte
r of d
isea
ses,
mis
take
n be
liefs
of t
he
fam
ily a
bout
the
dise
ase,
bel
ief i
n he
alin
g, b
elie
f in
the
incu
rabl
e ch
arac
ter o
f dis
ease
s, b
elie
f in
treat
men
t, be
liefs
rela
ted
to re
ligio
n.
Wis
hes:
Will
to h
ave
or g
et s
omet
hing
.Th
e ch
ild’s
des
ire fo
r oth
er fo
ods
cons
umed
by
the
fam
ily, d
esire
to fi
ll so
me
defic
it, u
nwan
ted
preg
nanc
y.
Sexu
al o
rient
atio
n: D
iffer
ent f
orm
s of
affe
ctive
and
sex
ual a
ttrac
tion
of e
ach
one.
Diffi
culti
es d
ue to
sex
ual o
rient
atio
n, d
ifficu
lty in
ass
umin
g se
xual
iden
tity
unde
r 18
year
s, le
avin
g ho
me
due
to s
exua
l orie
ntat
ion.
Men
tal h
ealth
: Sta
te o
f wel
l-bei
ng in
whi
ch a
n in
divid
ual i
s ab
le to
use
thei
r ow
n sk
ills,
reco
ver f
rom
rout
ine
stre
ss, b
e pr
oduc
tive
and
cont
ribut
e to
thei
r com
mun
ity.
Impa
ired
wel
l-bei
ng, s
tigm
a, h
igh
psyc
holo
gica
l dem
ands
, psy
chic
sta
te, p
sych
olog
ical
impa
ct, e
mot
iona
l and
psy
chos
ocia
l pr
oble
ms,
diffi
culti
es in
livin
g w
ith a
dis
ease
that
has
no
cure
, iso
latio
n st
rate
gies
, exc
essi
ve a
ttent
ion
to o
rgan
ic p
roce
sses
, ex
cess
ive s
ensi
tivity
to e
very
day
even
ts, t
ake
ever
ythi
ng th
at g
oes
wro
ng, l
oss
of c
ontro
l, ex
trem
e ch
ange
s in
em
otio
n fo
r sho
rt pe
riods
of t
ime,
unw
ante
d th
ough
ts, h
igh
expe
ctat
ions
of s
ympt
om re
lief,
disc
onne
ct fr
om e
mot
ions
like
nur
ses
to p
rote
ct
them
selve
s, fo
cus
on a
spec
ts n
egat
ive, i
nabi
lity
to e
xpre
ss fe
elin
gs, a
ge-r
elat
ed im
mat
urity
, diffi
culty
mak
ing
deci
sion
s, e
mot
iona
l im
pact
of t
he d
isea
se o
n th
e re
side
nt, e
xpec
ting
the
wor
st w
ithou
t rea
son,
em
otio
nal t
raum
atic
effe
cts
of th
e di
agno
sis,
ps
ycho
logi
cal d
ifficu
lties
in b
reas
tfeed
ing,
em
otio
nal d
ifficu
lties
with
pre
gnan
cy, e
mot
iona
l asp
ects
exp
erie
nced
as
a re
sult
of th
e di
seas
e, a
ffect
ive a
spec
ts e
xper
ienc
ed in
cur
rent
illn
ess,
not
refle
ctin
g on
bei
ng c
ared
for b
y nu
rses
, diff
eren
t typ
es o
f pat
ient
, ab
senc
e or
insu
ffici
ency
of d
istin
ctive
ass
essm
ent r
egar
ding
the
rais
ing
of o
ther
chi
ldre
n, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
neg
otia
tion
abou
t pre
vent
ion
prac
tices
, ina
bilit
y to
dis
crim
inat
e th
e pr
esen
ce ri
sk o
r vul
nera
bilit
y, de
pend
ence
on
serv
ices
, rea
sons
for n
ot
perfo
rmin
g a
prev
entiv
e ex
am, r
easo
ns fo
r ris
ky b
ehav
ior,
beha
viora
l rea
son
for n
ot lo
okin
g fo
r the
hea
lth s
ervic
e, d
epre
ssio
n,
psyc
hoso
cial
stre
ssor
s, le
vel o
f stre
ss a
t wor
k, s
tress
, psy
chic
con
sequ
ence
of v
iole
nce,
dis
satis
fact
ion
with
wor
k, la
ck o
f sen
se o
f w
ork,
sub
ject
ive h
ealth
pro
blem
s, m
enta
l hea
lth p
robl
ems,
dis
abilit
y at
war
.
Perc
eptio
ns: M
enta
l pro
cess
thro
ugh
whi
ch th
e su
bjec
t attr
ibut
es a
mea
ning
to s
enso
ry
stim
uli,
mak
ing
them
con
scio
us, f
rom
a h
isto
ry o
f pas
t exp
erie
nces
.No
n-pe
rcep
tion
of ri
sk b
ehav
ior,
non-
perc
eptio
n of
risk
, non
-per
cept
ion
of th
reat
to h
ealth
, per
cept
ion
of n
on-r
isk
beha
vior,
inco
here
nt id
eas
abou
t pre
vent
ion
prac
tices
, non
-per
cept
ion
of th
e ne
ed to
ado
pt p
reve
ntive
mea
sure
s, n
on-p
erce
ptio
n of
pr
obab
ility
of il
lnes
s in
the
face
of r
isky
beh
avio
r, no
t per
ceivi
ng th
e pr
obab
ility
of e
xpos
ure
to th
e di
seas
e, n
ot p
erce
iving
the
dise
ase
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e ris
k gr
oups
, not
per
ceivi
ng th
e pr
obab
ility
of h
avin
g a
dise
ase,
not
per
ceivi
ng th
e ch
ance
of b
eing
sic
k,
not p
erce
iving
the
prob
abilit
y of
get
ting
sick
, no
perc
eptio
n of
hea
lth p
robl
ems,
non
-per
cept
ion
of th
e di
seas
e as
an
even
t tha
t pr
omot
es a
sses
smen
t of e
xper
ienc
es, n
on-p
erce
ptio
n of
the
dist
inct
ion
betw
een
age
grou
p be
fore
a d
isea
se, n
on-p
erce
ptio
n of
the
effe
ct o
f the
dis
ease
on
the
elde
rly, n
on-p
erce
ptio
n of
frag
ility,
non-
perc
eptio
n of
the
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
deat
h an
d lif
e in
rela
tion
to d
isea
se, n
ot re
pres
entin
g th
e di
seas
e as
soci
ated
with
pro
mis
cuity
and
irre
spon
sibi
lity
of w
omen
, not
per
ceivi
ng n
eglig
ence
as
form
s of
abu
se, n
ot p
erce
iving
wor
king
con
ditio
ns, n
ot p
erce
iving
low
leve
ls o
f qua
lity
of li
fe, n
ot p
erce
iving
exp
erie
nce,
exp
erie
ncin
g vu
lner
abilit
y, no
t per
ceivi
ng th
e re
ason
s fo
r the
vul
nera
bilit
y of
the
othe
r, em
otio
nal r
easo
n (p
erce
ptio
n ) s
earc
h fo
r hea
lth s
ervic
es,
emot
iona
l rea
sons
(per
cept
ion)
for n
on-p
reve
ntio
n pr
actic
es, n
on-p
erce
ptio
n of
vul
nera
bilit
y, no
n-pe
rcep
tion
of it
s im
porta
nce
in
build
ing
a fu
ture
for c
hild
ren,
non
-per
cept
ion
of a
ppre
ciat
ion
and
auto
nom
y, no
n-pe
rcep
tion
of th
e ro
le p
laye
d , r
easo
ns (p
erce
ptio
n)
of n
on-p
reve
ntio
n, d
ecre
ased
per
cept
ion,
per
cept
ion
of b
eing
out
side
the
grou
p, p
erce
ptio
n of
the
heal
th u
nit a
s a
plac
e of
car
e fo
r pa
tient
s, n
egat
ive s
elf-
perc
eptio
n of
hea
lth, f
ragm
enta
tion
of th
e ph
ysic
al a
nd m
enta
l bod
y, di
stor
ted
self-
imag
e.
Feel
ings
: Sta
tes
and
the
reac
tions
that
the
hum
an b
ody
is a
ble
to e
xpre
ss in
the
face
of
the
even
ts th
at th
e su
bjec
ts e
xper
ienc
e, w
heth
er p
ositi
ve o
r neg
ative
.In
grat
itude
, dis
trust
, dep
ende
nce
on o
ther
s, p
erso
nal s
treng
th, n
o ho
pe o
f hea
ling,
anx
iety,
wor
ry, f
ear,
desp
air,
emba
rrass
men
t, im
pote
nce,
unc
erta
inty,
suf
ferin
g, p
ity, a
nger
, fee
ling
unpr
epar
ed, f
eelin
gs, v
ario
us fe
elin
gs, f
ear,
inse
curit
y, sa
dnes
s, fe
elin
g th
at th
e st
aff f
eel t
hrea
tene
d, fe
elin
g th
at th
e re
sour
ces
them
selve
s ar
e in
suffi
cien
t to
face
situ
atio
ns, f
eelin
g th
at th
ey a
re lo
sing
con
trol o
ver
impo
rtant
situ
atio
ns, h
elpl
essn
ess,
dis
com
fort,
hel
ples
snes
s.
Valu
es: A
set
of i
ntrin
sic
char
acte
ristic
s re
late
d to
the
soci
al n
orm
s of
a g
iven
subj
ect,
whi
ch d
eter
min
es h
ow h
e be
have
s an
d in
tera
cts
with
oth
er s
ubje
cts
and
with
the
envir
onm
ent.
Inco
here
nt v
alue
s on
pre
vent
ion
prac
tices
.
Cont
inue
...
Cont
inua
tion.
11Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Florêncio RS, Moreira TM
SUBJ
ECT
Conc
ept/C
onst
ituen
t Defi
nitio
nSu
bcon
cept
/Con
stitu
ent d
efini
tion
Oper
atio
nal d
efini
tion
Phys
ical
sta
tus:
The
cha
ract
eris
tics
of th
e su
bjec
t in
rela
tion
to th
eir
phys
ical
, phy
siol
ogic
al o
r pat
holo
gica
l at
tribu
tes.
Age:
Tim
e, in
yea
rs, m
onth
s an
d da
ys, e
laps
ed fr
om b
irth
to th
e tim
e of
whi
ch w
e sp
eak.
Age
of fi
rst s
exua
l int
erco
urse
, eld
erly,
age
whe
n th
ey le
ft ho
me
for t
he fi
rst t
ime,
beg
inni
ng o
f sex
ual a
ctivi
ty w
ith lo
wer
age
in th
is
popu
latio
n se
gmen
t, be
ginn
ing
of s
exua
l life
bef
ore
15 y
ears
, pro
duct
ive p
erio
d. D
epen
ding
on
the
cont
ext.
Sex:
A s
et o
f stru
ctur
al a
nd fu
nctio
nal c
hara
cter
istic
s ac
cord
ing
to w
hich
a li
ving
bein
g is
cl
assi
fied
as m
ale
or fe
mal
e.De
pend
ing
on th
e si
tuat
ion,
em
phas
is o
n be
ing
a w
oman
.
Race
/col
or: C
ateg
ory
used
to re
fer t
o a
grou
p of
peo
ple
who
se p
hysi
cal c
hara
cter
istic
s ar
e co
nsid
ered
soc
ially
sig
nific
ant:
whi
te, b
lack
, bro
wn,
indi
geno
us o
r yel
low.
Depe
ndin
g on
the
situ
atio
n, e
mph
asis
on
bein
g bl
ack.
Wor
k-re
late
d ph
ysic
al a
spec
ts: A
ll ac
tivity
per
form
ed in
the
wor
k th
at re
quire
s ac
cess
to
the
char
acte
ristic
s of
the
body
.Ph
ysic
al e
xerti
on a
t wor
k, re
petit
ive m
ovem
ents
at w
ork,
phy
sica
l wor
k po
stur
e, ti
me
stan
ding
at w
ork,
pai
n or
dis
com
fort
as a
resu
lt of
wor
k.
Impa
ct o
f illn
ess
at w
ork:
Any
con
sequ
ence
of t
he d
isea
se a
ffect
ing
wor
k.Di
fficu
lty in
rem
aini
ng in
occ
upat
iona
l act
ivity
due
to il
lnes
s, d
ifficu
lties
for o
ccup
atio
nal a
ctivi
ties
due
to il
lnes
s, lo
ss o
f em
ploy
men
t du
e to
illn
ess.
Heal
th-d
isea
se s
tatu
s: C
hara
cter
istic
s re
late
d to
the
hist
ory
or c
urre
nt c
ondi
tion
in th
e he
alth
-dis
ease
pro
cess
, whe
ther
in th
e ge
nera
l hea
lth c
onte
xt, s
igns
and
sym
ptom
s,
diag
nosi
s, te
sts,
trea
tmen
t, co
mor
bidi
ties
or p
rogn
osis
rela
ted
to a
dis
ease
.
Hosp
ital a
dmis
sion
s, a
ttend
ance
at e
mer
genc
y se
rvic
es, c
onsu
mpt
ion
of e
xces
sive
hea
lth c
are,
ann
ual n
umbe
r of v
isits
to th
e he
alth
se
rvic
e, v
isit
by s
ever
al p
rofe
ssio
nals
, pro
pens
ity to
vis
it m
edic
al s
peci
alis
ts, v
isit
five
or m
ore
diffe
rent
clin
ical
dep
artm
ents
, vis
it th
e m
ost i
mpo
rtant
pro
vider
sev
en ti
mes
a y
ear,
heal
th h
isto
ry, f
amily
his
tory
of i
llnes
s, u
nkno
wn
caus
es o
f illn
ess,
con
tact
with
co
ntam
inan
ts, e
xpos
ure
and
susc
eptib
ility
to il
lnes
s, e
xpos
ure
to w
ar, p
oor h
ealth
, poo
r hea
lth, p
oor c
urre
nt h
ealth
, med
ical
fact
ors,
ne
ed n
euro
psyc
holo
gica
l ass
essm
ent,
poor
hea
lth c
ondi
tions
, com
orbi
dity
inde
x, c
omor
bidi
ty, p
hysi
cal d
isab
ility,
war
dis
abilit
y, di
sabi
lity,
acci
dent
s, re
port
of il
lnes
s, p
hysi
cal a
nd s
enso
ry d
ifficu
lties
, dia
gnos
tic d
ata,
chr
onic
con
ditio
ns, h
isto
ry o
f illn
ess,
obe
sity,
nu
tritio
nal s
tatu
s di
abet
es, i
mm
unos
uppr
essi
ve d
isea
se a
nd tr
eatm
ent,
dise
ase
stag
e, d
iagn
osis
num
ber p
rimar
y sy
mpt
oms,
di
seas
e pr
eval
ence
, hea
lth p
robl
ems,
dem
entia
dis
ease
pro
cess
, typ
e of
dis
abilit
y, pe
ople
with
dis
abilit
ies,
tim
e of
dia
gnos
is, t
ime
of d
iagn
osis
of t
he d
isea
se, w
itnes
sing
the
inev
itabl
e w
orse
ning
of t
he d
isea
se, n
umbe
r of p
regn
anci
es, d
epen
denc
e, lo
w im
mun
ity,
prol
onge
d ex
posu
re to
risk
fact
ors,
hig
h ph
ysic
al d
eman
ds, d
isea
se p
rope
nsity
, rea
sons
for r
isky
beh
avio
r - c
ondo
m la
tex
alle
rgy,
gene
ral s
igns
and
sym
ptom
s of
the
dise
ase,
som
atic
alte
ratio
n, s
leep
dis
orde
rs a
nd d
isor
ders
, sex
ual d
isor
ders
, tir
ed e
ven
afte
r sl
eepi
ng, w
eigh
t los
s, p
ain,
fatig
ue, n
ippl
e cr
acks
, wea
knes
s, c
hang
es in
phy
sica
l app
eara
nce
due
to il
lnes
s, p
hysi
cal d
ifficu
lties
w
ith p
regn
ancy
, phy
sica
l con
sequ
ence
s of
trea
tmen
t, ty
pe o
f med
icat
ion,
ada
pted
trea
tmen
t, al
tern
ative
trea
tmen
t: te
as a
nd ju
ices
, ph
arm
acol
ogic
al tr
eatm
ent,
prev
entiv
e tre
atm
ent,
psyc
hiat
ric tr
eatm
ent,
treat
men
t use
d, m
edic
atio
n us
e, tr
eatm
ent d
ata,
indi
cate
s tre
atm
ent,
spec
ific
clin
ical
exa
min
atio
n, m
edic
al e
xam
inat
ion,
pre
vious
exa
min
atio
n of
the
dise
ase,
clin
ical
test
s us
ed fo
r dia
gnos
is,
daily
col
lect
ion
of g
ener
al la
bora
tory
test
s, la
ck o
f int
eres
t in
carr
ying
out d
iagn
ostic
test
s, te
st re
sults
, pos
itive
test
resu
lt, p
rogn
ostic
fa
ctor
, low
sur
vival
, com
plic
atio
ns.
Cont
inue
...
Cont
inua
tion.
12 Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Health vulnerability model: conceptual clarification from social subjects’ perspective
SOCI
AL
Conc
ept/C
onst
ituen
t Defi
nitio
nSu
bcon
cept
/Con
stitu
ent d
efini
tion
Oper
atio
nal d
efini
tion
Soci
oeco
nom
ic s
tatu
s: A
set
of
econ
omic
, soc
iolo
gica
l, ed
ucat
iona
l an
d la
bor c
hara
cter
istic
s th
at q
ualif
y a
subj
ect o
r gro
up w
ithin
a s
ocia
l hi
erar
chy.
Mat
eria
l goo
ds: E
very
thin
g th
at h
as a
con
cret
e fo
rm a
nd s
ome
utilit
y, be
ing
able
to s
atis
fy
a ne
ed o
f the
sub
ject
.No
t hav
ing
a m
icro
com
pute
r, m
otor
cycl
e, a
utom
obile
for p
rivat
e us
e or
hom
e ow
ners
hip,
mat
eria
l dep
rivat
ion,
dep
rivat
ion
of m
ater
ial
reso
urce
s, v
ario
us d
epriv
atio
ns.
Hous
ing:
Com
mon
des
igna
tion
of h
ousi
ng, w
hich
may
or m
ay n
ot b
e m
ater
ializ
ed a
s a
hous
e, s
ince
the
stre
et is
ofte
n co
nsid
ered
the
plac
e of
resi
denc
e.Hi
gh p
ropo
rtion
of r
esid
ents
per
dor
mito
ry, p
reca
rious
hou
sing
con
ditio
ns, p
reca
rious
cha
ract
eris
tic o
f the
room
s, li
ving
at h
ome
with
a
smal
l num
ber o
f dor
mito
ries,
inst
itutio
naliz
ed li
ving,
hou
sing
nee
ds.
Inco
me:
Sou
rce
of m
oney
thro
ugh
whi
ch o
ne c
an b
uy g
oods
and
ser
vices
, i.e
., it
is
rem
uner
atio
n re
ceive
d m
ainl
y af
ter a
per
iod
of w
ork
or th
roug
h so
cial
pro
gram
s.In
com
e fo
r dis
ease
s, lo
w fa
mily
inco
me,
sm
all n
umbe
r or a
bsen
ce o
f fam
ily m
embe
rs w
ith in
com
e, s
mal
l or a
bsen
t am
ount
of
peop
le w
ith p
aid
wor
k, in
abilit
y to
gen
erat
e in
com
e, re
ceip
t of s
ocia
l ass
ista
nce
subs
idie
s fro
m th
e go
vern
men
t, re
ceip
t of s
ickn
ess
bene
fit, r
ecei
pt o
f soc
ial b
enefi
t, in
serti
on in
ass
ista
nce/
bene
fit p
rogr
am, fi
nanc
ial p
robl
ems,
eco
nom
ic d
ifficu
lties
, fina
ncia
l co
nditi
on.
Soci
al c
lass
: Gro
up o
f sub
ject
s w
ith c
hara
cter
istic
s in
com
mon
from
the
econ
omic
, be
havio
ral a
nd id
eolo
gica
l rep
rese
ntat
ion
poin
t of v
iew
of t
he w
orld
aro
und
them
, in
a re
latio
nshi
p of
hie
rarc
hy w
ith o
ther
gro
ups.
Dive
rse
soci
al s
tatu
s, u
nfav
orab
le s
ocia
l pos
ition
, low
soc
ioec
onom
ic s
tatu
s, e
cono
mic
cla
ss, f
amily
eco
nom
ic s
tatu
s, lo
w s
ocia
l cl
ass,
low
pur
chas
ing
pow
er, p
over
ty c
ondi
tion.
Wor
k:It
is th
e ac
tivity
upo
n w
hich
the
hum
an b
eing
em
ploy
s hi
s in
telle
ctua
l or p
hysi
cal
stre
ngth
to p
rodu
ce th
e m
eans
for h
is li
velih
ood.
Retir
emen
t, un
empl
oym
ent,
empl
oym
ent,
occu
patio
n, in
form
al o
ccup
atio
n, o
ccup
atio
n: s
tude
nt, o
ccup
atio
n: o
utsi
de th
e m
arke
t, sm
all a
mou
nt o
f sta
ff w
orki
ng w
ith a
sig
ned
portf
olio
, sm
all n
umbe
r of p
eopl
e w
orki
ng m
ore
than
6 m
onth
s in
em
ploy
men
t, ab
senc
e or
lack
of p
erm
anen
t edu
catio
n fo
r wor
k -
qual
ifica
tion
for w
ork,
abs
ence
or l
ack
of p
erm
anen
t edu
catio
n, n
ot re
ceivi
ng tr
aini
ng, n
ot
rece
iving
trai
ning
in h
ealth
and
saf
ety
at w
ork,
form
s of
bon
ding
wea
kene
d an
d pr
ecar
ious
, con
ditio
n of
the
dive
rse
orga
niza
tion,
ex
cess
ive w
orkl
oad,
exc
essi
ve w
orkl
oad,
unh
ealth
y an
d pr
ecar
ious
wor
k co
ntex
ts, e
xces
sive
wor
king
hou
rs, l
ack
of c
ontro
l ove
r w
ork,
pla
ces/
wor
king
con
ditio
n, a
bsen
ce o
r lac
k of
saf
ety
in th
e w
orkp
lace
, inc
iden
ts a
nd w
ork
acci
dent
s ar
e in
vest
igat
ed, p
ress
ure
at w
ork,
wor
k at
wor
k, w
ork
at w
ork
, joi
nt w
ork
diffi
culti
es, d
iffer
ent t
ypes
of w
ork,
wor
king
tim
e in
the
com
pany
, nig
ht s
hifts
, in
suffi
cien
t hum
an re
sour
ces,
und
erem
ploy
men
t, w
ork
sect
or, u
ninf
orm
ed a
nd in
effe
ctive
wor
kfor
ce, d
omes
tic o
verlo
ad, h
igh
nois
e le
vels
at w
ork,
wor
kloa
d an
d m
enta
l ove
rload
of w
ork,
lack
of f
reed
om o
f exp
ress
ion
at w
ork,
lack
of f
reed
om to
com
mun
icat
e w
ith
man
agem
ent,
exce
ssive
wor
k ru
les,
non
-con
tribu
tion
to s
ocia
l sec
urity
.
Educ
atio
n: T
each
ing-
lear
ning
pro
cess
es e
xper
ienc
ed in
the
fam
ily, s
choo
l or o
ther
in
stitu
tion
sign
ifica
nt fo
r the
sub
ject
s. T
his
proc
ess
can
take
pla
ce in
the
sphe
re o
f for
mal
ed
ucat
ion
or p
opul
ar e
duca
tion.
Diffi
culti
es w
ith e
duca
tion,
lack
of i
nves
tmen
t in
educ
atio
n.
Dem
ogra
phic
iden
tity:
A s
et o
f ch
arac
teris
tics
of a
pop
ulat
ion
that
liv
es in
a g
iven
terri
tory
and
pro
duce
s m
ovem
ents
in th
at s
pace
.
Ethn
icity
: Gro
up d
efine
d by
the
sam
e or
igin
, lin
guis
tic a
nd c
ultu
ral a
ffini
ties.
Ethn
ic g
roup
, min
ority
eth
nic
grou
ps
Orig
in: S
omeo
ne’s
pla
ce o
f orig
in.
Natio
nalit
y, or
igin
, orig
in: r
ural
are
a, o
rigin
: urb
an a
rea,
loca
lity,
leng
th o
f sta
y at
the
plac
e of
orig
in, d
omes
tic h
abita
t.
Mig
ratio
n: D
ispl
acem
ent o
f ind
ividu
als
with
in a
geo
grap
hic
spac
e.Im
mig
ratio
n, d
epen
ding
on
the
situ
atio
n: c
ount
ry o
f des
tinat
ion,
situ
atio
n of
refu
ge.
Cultu
re: T
he fo
rms
of e
xpre
ssio
n of
th
e or
gani
zatio
n of
a p
eopl
e, th
eir
cust
oms
and
tradi
tions
exc
hang
ed
and
trans
form
ed fr
om g
ener
atio
n to
gen
erat
ion
that
, fro
m a
com
mon
ex
perie
nce
and
tradi
tion,
are
pr
esen
ted
as th
e id
entit
y of
this
pe
ople
.
Cultu
ral f
orm
atio
n: H
ow th
e cu
lture
orig
inat
ed a
nd s
ettle
d in
to a
spe
cific
gro
up.
Cultu
ral f
orm
atio
n of
the
dive
rse
popu
latio
n.
Soci
al c
onst
ruct
ions
: All
cultu
ral e
xpre
ssio
ns a
bout
pre
vent
ion
and
how
they
wer
e bu
ilt.
Soci
al c
onst
ruct
ions
on
prev
entio
n pr
actic
es.
Cultu
ral d
iffer
ence
s: D
iffer
ent t
ypes
of c
ultu
re e
xist i
n re
latio
n to
a p
opul
atio
n or
gro
up.
Cultu
ral d
iffer
ence
s.
Popu
lar k
now
ledg
e: W
ays
in w
hich
the
subj
ects
pro
duce
mea
ning
s by
soc
ial a
nd c
ultu
ral
expe
rienc
es in
sea
rch
of e
xpla
natio
ns th
at re
late
asp
ects
suc
h as
nat
ural
, mag
ical
-re
ligio
us, o
r soc
iopo
litic
al a
spec
ts in
ord
er to
give
mea
ning
to e
vent
s.
Cultu
ral f
orm
atio
n of
the
dive
rse
popu
latio
n, in
cohe
rent
soc
ial c
onst
ruct
ions
on
prev
entio
n pr
actic
es, c
ultu
ral d
iffer
ence
s.
Fam
ily c
onte
xt: T
he w
ay
rela
tions
hips
in a
fam
ily h
appe
n.M
arita
l/fam
ily s
tatu
s: R
elat
iona
l cha
ract
eris
tic a
risin
g fro
m th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent o
f a fo
rmal
un
ion
or n
ot b
etw
een
subj
ects
.De
pend
ing
on th
e si
tuat
ion:
bei
ng m
arrie
d or
bei
ng s
ingl
e, ti
me
of s
tabl
e un
ion,
livin
g al
one,
num
ber o
f chi
ldre
n, m
othe
r of c
hild
up
to 2
yea
rs o
ld, f
amily
situ
atio
n (w
ith w
hom
she
live
s).
Mem
ber c
hara
cter
istic
: Attr
ibut
es o
f the
mem
bers
of a
fam
ily fo
r who
m th
e ca
re a
nd
atte
ntio
n ne
cess
ary
for t
heir
harm
ony
are
spen
t.Ch
ild o
r ado
lesc
ent u
p to
14
year
s ol
d in
the
hous
e, C
hild
ren,
ado
lesc
ent o
r you
ng p
erso
n up
to 1
7 ye
ars
in th
e ho
use,
bei
ng fa
mily
of
the
child
with
onc
olog
ic p
ain,
eld
erly
in th
e ho
use,
eld
erly
in th
e ho
use
with
oth
er e
lder
ly, e
lder
ly pe
rson
suf
fere
d fa
ll, fa
mily
m
embe
r with
dis
abilit
ies,
fam
ily m
embe
r with
diffi
culty
in c
omm
unic
atio
n an
d so
cial
func
tioni
ng, f
amily
mem
ber w
ith b
ehav
iora
l and
ps
ycho
logi
cal d
ifficu
lties
, fa
mily
mem
ber w
ith le
arni
ng d
ifficu
lties
, fam
ily m
embe
r with
epi
leps
y or
con
vuls
ion,
num
ber o
f peo
ple
with
chr
onic
dis
ease
s, a
lcoh
olic
fath
er, l
ow s
choo
ling
of p
eopl
e in
the
hous
e, lo
w s
choo
ling
of th
e he
ad o
f the
fam
ily.
Fam
ily ty
pes:
Sev
eral
con
text
s ex
perie
nced
by
a fa
mily
with
rega
rd to
thei
r org
aniza
tion,
w
heth
er re
latio
nal o
r fina
ncia
l.Ex
tend
ed fa
milie
s, e
xten
ded
and
sing
le-p
aren
t fam
ilies,
num
ber o
f peo
ple
in th
e ho
useh
old,
ove
rcro
wdi
ng a
t hom
e, fe
mal
e he
ad o
f th
e fa
mily
afte
r situ
atio
n of
soc
ial d
ifficu
lty, p
atria
rchy
, fem
ale
sing
le p
aren
thoo
d.Co
ntin
ue...
Cont
inua
tion.
13Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Florêncio RS, Moreira TM
SOCI
AL
Conc
ept/C
onst
ituen
t Defi
nitio
nSu
bcon
cept
/Con
stitu
ent d
efini
tion
Oper
atio
nal d
efini
tion
Soci
al m
edia
: Soc
ial s
truct
ure
com
pose
d of
peo
ple
or o
rgan
izatio
ns,
conn
ecte
d by
one
or s
ever
al ty
pes
of re
latio
nshi
ps, w
ho s
hare
com
mon
va
lues
and
obj
ectiv
es o
f offe
ring
supp
ort i
n a
situ
atio
n of
nee
d of
the
subj
ect o
r soc
iety.
Soci
al s
uppo
rt: V
arie
ty o
f rea
l or p
erce
ived
reso
urce
s av
aila
ble
and
offe
red
to a
sub
ject
th
roug
h th
eir t
ies
with
oth
ers
in v
ario
us a
reas
(pro
fess
iona
l, fa
mily
or w
ithin
the
scop
e of
fri
ends
hip)
.
Need
for s
uppo
rt fro
m h
ealth
pro
fess
iona
ls, l
ack
of s
uppo
rt fro
m h
ealth
pro
fess
iona
ls, a
bsen
ce o
f soc
ial s
uppo
rt an
d ad
equa
te
rece
ptio
n -
form
al c
areg
iver,
redu
ced
soci
al c
ircle
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of s
ocia
l sup
port,
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of s
ocia
l su
ppor
t pro
vided
by
form
al c
areg
ivers
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
nt in
stitu
tiona
l sup
port,
frag
ility
in th
e su
ppor
t pro
vided
dur
ing
pren
atal
ca
re, n
eed
for f
amily
sup
port,
non
-mon
itorin
g by
a fa
mily
mem
ber f
or h
ealth
car
e, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
fam
ily s
uppo
rt,
abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f pat
erna
l sup
port,
rece
iving
vis
its in
suffi
cien
t or e
xces
sive
fam
ily m
embe
rs, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
fam
ily in
serti
on in
car
e, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
fam
ily m
embe
r par
ticip
atio
n in
chi
ld c
are,
wea
k or
abs
ent f
amily
net
wor
ks,
rece
iving
vis
its fr
om in
suffi
cien
t or e
xces
sive
frie
nds,
info
rmal
sup
port
netw
orks
of c
olle
ague
s, n
ot a
ccom
pany
ing
frien
ds in
hea
lth
care
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of p
revio
usly
rece
ived
supp
ort,
abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f soc
ial s
uppo
rt ne
twor
ks, a
bsen
ce o
r in
suffi
cien
cy o
f soc
ial s
uppo
rt if
som
eone
nee
ds c
ompa
ny, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
soc
ial s
uppo
rt if
som
eone
nee
ds m
oney
or
finan
cial
aid
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of s
ocia
l sup
port
if ne
ed to
rece
ive h
ealth
car
e, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
soc
ial s
uppo
rt if
som
eone
nee
ds to
leav
e ho
me,
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of s
ocia
l sup
port
to p
erfo
rm d
omes
tic ta
sks,
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of
soci
al s
uppo
rt w
hen
som
eone
nee
ds m
ater
ial g
oods
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of s
uppo
rt fo
r pre
vent
ion
prac
tice
, with
out a
car
egive
r w
hen
they
nee
d fo
llow
-up
for c
onsu
ltatio
ns o
r hos
pita
lizat
ions
, per
cept
ion
of s
ocia
l sup
port,
dep
ende
nce
on o
ther
s fo
r the
ir ca
re a
nd
supp
ort.
Gend
er: I
t is
an id
entit
y ca
tego
ry
of w
hat i
s cu
ltura
lly c
onst
ruct
ed a
s fe
min
ine
or m
ale,
with
out,
how
ever
, re
sulti
ng e
xclu
sive
ly fro
m b
iolo
gica
l se
x, s
ince
gen
der i
s an
inte
ntio
nal
act,
a pe
rform
ative
ges
ture
that
pr
oduc
es m
eani
ngs.
Gend
er in
equa
lity:
Diff
eren
t tre
atm
ent g
iven
to s
ubje
cts
due
to g
ende
r iss
ues
eith
er b
y in
divid
uals
or i
nstit
utio
ns.
Gene
ral g
ende
r ine
qual
ities
, rea
son
for d
ropp
ing
out o
f stu
dies
: bei
ng tr
ansv
estit
e, g
ende
r bel
ief o
f soc
iety
abo
ut p
eopl
e w
ith
disa
bilit
ies.
Trad
ition
al ro
les:
Set
of e
xpec
ted
beha
viors
cha
ract
eris
tic o
f a c
erta
in p
ositi
on in
soc
iety.
Trad
ition
al g
ende
r rol
es, r
epre
sent
atio
n of
wom
en a
s ca
refu
l and
pre
cario
us a
nd w
ith a
sin
gle
partn
er.
Mal
e ch
auvi
nism
: A s
et o
f atti
tude
s an
d be
havio
rs th
at re
sult
in th
e ov
erva
luat
ion
of m
ale
char
acte
ristic
s.Se
xual
pra
ctic
es o
f sub
mis
sion
to m
en, a
ttitu
des
and
sexis
t ide
as b
y w
omen
: pow
er o
f con
dom
use
is e
xclu
sive
to th
e m
an,
accu
sativ
e at
titud
e of
pro
mis
cuity
, irre
spon
sibi
lity
of w
omen
tow
ards
oth
er w
omen
, atti
tude
of s
ubm
issi
on to
the
partn
er, i
nflue
nce
of
sexis
t and
pat
riarc
hal c
onst
ruct
s on
sex
and
mar
riage
, ide
a th
at th
e si
ck w
oman
is ir
resp
onsi
ble
and
prom
iscu
ous.
Viol
ence
: It i
s th
e in
tent
iona
l use
of
phy
sica
l or a
ctua
l for
ce o
r pow
er
agai
nst o
nese
lf, a
gain
st a
noth
er
pers
on o
r aga
inst
a g
roup
or
com
mun
ity, t
hat r
esul
t or a
re li
kely
to
resu
lt in
inju
ry, d
eath
, psy
chol
ogic
al
harm
, poo
r dev
elop
men
t, or
de
priva
tion.
Disc
rimin
atio
n: A
ctio
n ba
sed
on p
reju
dice
that
dis
tingu
ishe
s a
pers
on o
r gro
up fr
om
othe
rs in
a p
ejor
ative
way
.Di
scrim
inat
ion
in e
mpl
oym
ent,
disc
rimin
atio
n: in
stitu
tiona
l vio
lenc
e, e
thni
c-ra
cial
dis
crim
inat
ion,
dis
crim
inat
ion
in th
e fa
mily
en
viron
men
t and
in th
e gr
oup
of n
eigh
bors
, dis
crim
inat
ion
in th
e la
st y
ear,
raci
al d
iscr
imin
atio
n: u
nequ
al tr
eatm
ent,
disc
rimin
atio
n,
disc
rimin
atio
n: fa
mily
env
ironm
ent a
nd in
gro
ups
of fr
iend
s an
d ne
ighb
ors
and
heal
th p
rofe
ssio
nals
, dis
crim
inat
ion:
relig
ious
en
viron
men
t, di
scrim
inat
ion:
lack
of c
hara
cter
, dis
crim
inat
ion:
com
mer
ce a
nd le
isur
e pl
aces
, dis
crim
inat
ion:
phy
sica
l app
eara
nce;
th
ose
aris
ing
from
issu
es o
f cha
ract
er, o
ther
s re
late
d to
inte
llect
ual c
apac
ity, d
iscr
imin
atio
n: in
com
mer
ce a
nd le
isur
e pl
aces
, di
scrim
inat
ion:
inte
llect
ual d
isab
ility,
disc
rimin
atio
n by
teac
hers
or c
olle
ague
s, s
tigm
a an
d di
scrim
inat
ion,
situ
atio
ns o
f dis
crim
inat
ion
perp
etra
ted
by d
iscr
imin
atio
n: o
ffens
es a
nd p
oor q
ualit
y ca
re, s
uffe
r dis
crim
inat
ion,
neg
ative
ste
reot
ypes
tow
ards
bla
cks,
hos
tility
(s
uffe
ring
host
ility
reac
tion)
, hom
opho
bia,
relig
ious
hom
opho
bia
and
hom
opho
bia
in e
mpl
oym
ent ,
be
labe
led
by s
omeo
ne, p
reju
dice
, di
scrim
inat
ion
suffe
red,
raci
sm, i
nstit
utio
nal r
acis
m, v
ictim
of r
acia
l pre
judi
ce, p
reju
dice
in re
latio
n to
the
dise
ase,
suf
fer p
reju
dice
s in
rela
tion
to s
exua
lity,
suffe
r pre
judi
ces
to li
ve m
othe
rhoo
d.
Sexu
al v
iole
nce:
Sex
ual v
iole
nce
is a
ny s
exua
l act
or a
ttem
pt to
obt
ain
a se
xual
act
by
viole
nce
or c
oerc
ion,
unw
ante
d se
xual
com
men
ts o
r adv
ance
s, a
cts
to tr
affic
a p
erso
n or
ac
ts d
irect
ed a
gain
st a
per
son’
s se
xual
ity, r
egar
dles
s of
the
rela
tions
hip
to th
e vic
tim.
Sexu
al v
iole
nce,
mar
ital v
iole
nce.
Phys
ical
vio
lenc
e: In
tent
iona
l use
of p
hysi
cal f
orce
aga
inst
one
self,
aga
inst
ano
ther
pe
rson
, or a
gain
st a
gro
up o
r com
mun
ity fo
r the
pur
pose
of c
ausi
ng in
jury
or d
eath
.Hi
gh h
omic
ide
rate
s, p
hysi
cal v
iole
nce,
mar
ital v
iole
nce.
Verb
al v
iole
nce:
Any
act
whe
re th
e ag
gres
sor m
akes
offe
nsive
rem
arks
abo
ut a
noth
er
pers
on.
Offe
nsive
ver
baliz
atio
n w
ith s
hout
ing
and
curs
ing,
am
ong
othe
rs.
Psyc
holo
gica
l vio
lenc
e: U
nequ
al re
latio
nshi
p of
pow
er, i
n w
hich
age
nts
exer
cise
aut
horit
y ov
er v
ictim
s, s
ubje
ctin
g th
em to
psy
chol
ogic
al a
buse
in a
con
tinuo
us a
nd in
tent
iona
l m
anne
r.
Use
of p
ower
to in
timid
ate
or a
buse
, bul
lying
, int
imid
atio
n an
d ha
rass
men
t in
the
wor
kpla
ce, d
ingh
ies,
vio
lenc
e as
a d
aily
even
t, in
stitu
tiona
l vio
lenc
e.
Cont
inue
...
Cont
inua
tion.
14 Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Health vulnerability model: conceptual clarification from social subjects’ perspective
SOCI
AL
Conc
ept/C
onst
ituen
t Defi
nitio
nSu
bcon
cept
/Con
stitu
ent d
efini
tion
Oper
atio
nal d
efini
tion
Soci
al c
ontr
ol: D
emoc
ratic
stra
tegy
of
citi
zen
parti
cipa
tion
in th
e ex
erci
se
of p
ower
, pla
cing
the
soci
al w
ill as
an
asse
ssm
ent f
acto
r for
the
crea
tion
and
goal
s to
be
achi
eved
in th
e co
ntex
t of p
ublic
pol
icie
s.
Soci
al p
artic
ipat
ion:
Per
form
ance
of a
sub
ject
or g
roup
in th
e th
eore
tical
and
pra
ctic
al
plan
es o
f soc
ial m
ovem
ents
for d
ecis
ion
mak
ing
that
has
resu
lted
for t
he c
olle
ctive
.No
n-pa
rtici
patio
n in
any
org
anize
d ac
tivity
, non
-par
ticip
atio
n in
the
soci
al m
ovem
ent,
non-
parti
cipa
tion
in s
uppo
rt gr
oups
and
go
vern
men
tal a
nd n
on-g
over
nmen
tal o
rgan
izatio
ns, n
on-p
opul
ar p
artic
ipat
ion
in d
isea
se c
ontro
l, no
n-so
cial
par
ticip
atio
n, n
on-
indu
stria
l/uni
on in
volve
men
t.
Ecos
yste
m: I
t is
the
set o
f re
latio
nshi
ps th
at li
ving
bein
gs a
nd
the
envir
onm
ent,
com
pose
d of
the
elem
ents
soi
l, w
ater
and
atm
osph
ere
(abi
otic
fact
ors)
mai
ntai
n si
ngs
with
ea
ch o
ther
.
Was
te: E
very
thin
g th
at is
not
use
d in
hum
an a
ctivi
ties,
com
ing
from
indu
strie
s, s
hops
and
re
side
nces
, i.e
., ga
rbag
e, m
ater
ial t
hat r
emai
ns a
fter a
n ac
tion
or p
rodu
ctio
n pr
oces
s.In
adeq
uate
hom
e w
aste
dis
posa
l, st
reet
was
te, i
nsuf
ficie
nt re
cycl
ing
and
use
of u
sed
mat
eria
ls, i
nade
quat
e pa
ckag
ing
and
was
te
dest
inat
ion.
Envi
ronm
ent:
Natu
ral a
nd s
ocia
l spa
ce (b
uilt)
whe
re th
e hu
man
bei
ng a
nd a
ll ot
her l
iving
be
ings
live
.M
ater
ial e
lem
ents
, cha
ract
eris
tic o
f act
ivitie
s on
var
ious
land
, lan
d te
nure
, typ
e of
agr
icul
ture
, agr
ibus
ines
s, u
se o
f hou
sing
by
the
fam
ily, e
cono
mic
dep
ende
nce
on a
gric
ultu
ral a
ctivi
ties,
unb
alan
ced
ecos
yste
m, s
patia
l and
tem
pora
l dyn
amic
s of
def
ores
tatio
n,
plac
e of
repr
oduc
tion
of th
e ve
ctor
, pol
lutio
n, d
am d
isru
ptio
n.
Clim
ate:
Diff
eren
t wea
ther
sta
tes
that
repe
at a
nd s
ucce
ed in
the
atm
osph
ere
thro
ugho
ut
the
year
in a
give
n re
gion
, con
sist
ing
of e
lem
ents
suc
h as
tem
pera
ture
, atm
osph
eric
pr
essu
re, r
ain,
sno
w, a
nd h
ail a
nd w
inds
.
Dive
rse
clim
atic
fact
ors,
abs
ent o
r ins
uffic
ient
nat
ural
ven
tilat
ion.
Acce
ss to
fund
amen
tal r
ight
s: T
he
poss
ibilit
y of
the
subj
ect e
njoy
fully
an
d re
spec
tfully
all
his
right
s.
Firs
t gen
erat
ion
fund
amen
tal r
ight
s: R
ight
to li
fe, f
reed
om, p
rope
rty, f
reed
om o
f ex
pres
sion
, pol
itica
l and
relig
ious
par
ticip
atio
n, in
viola
bilit
y of
dom
icile
, fre
edom
of
asse
mbl
y, am
ong
othe
rs.
Abse
nt o
r ins
uffic
ient
acc
ess
to s
ocia
l and
pol
itica
l par
ticip
atio
n.
Seco
nd g
ener
atio
n fu
ndam
enta
l rig
hts:
Sec
ond-
dim
ensi
on ri
ghts
are
thos
e in
whi
ch th
e St
ate
has
resp
onsi
bilit
y fo
r the
real
izatio
n of
an
idea
l of d
igni
fied
life
in s
ocie
ty. L
inke
d to
th
e va
lue
of e
qual
ity, t
he fu
ndam
enta
l rig
hts
of th
e se
cond
dim
ensi
on a
re s
ocia
l, ec
onom
ic
and
cultu
ral r
ight
s.
Abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f hea
lth in
sura
nce,
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of a
cces
s to
hea
lth c
are,
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of a
cces
s to
hea
lth s
ervic
es, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
acc
ess
- us
e of
pub
lic h
ealth
ser
vices
, lon
g tim
e to
reac
h th
e ne
ares
t hea
lth s
ervic
e,
abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f acc
ess
to re
habi
litat
ion,
hig
h ex
pend
iture
on
heal
th, d
imin
ishe
d re
sour
ces
for p
aym
ent f
or h
ealth
se
rvic
es a
nd/o
r pur
chas
e of
med
icin
es, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
acc
ess
to d
iagn
osis
and
trea
tmen
t, ab
senc
e or
insu
ffici
ency
of
acc
ess
to p
reve
ntio
n su
pplie
s, d
ista
nce,
acc
ess
to th
e se
rvic
e: d
istri
butio
n of
pas
swor
ds, a
cces
s to
the
serv
ice:
wai
ting
in lo
ng
lines
, acc
ess
to th
e se
rvic
e: la
ck o
f hea
lth s
ervic
es, a
cces
s to
the
serv
ice:
lack
of b
eds,
acc
ess
to th
e se
rvic
e: la
ck o
f sol
utio
ns fo
r ne
eds,
acc
ess
to th
e se
rvic
e: q
ueue
s , a
cces
s to
the
serv
ice:
wai
ting
time,
acc
ess
to th
e se
rvic
e: d
ifficu
lty in
tran
spor
t, ab
senc
e or
insu
ffici
ent a
cces
s to
sup
port
serv
ices
(hea
lth p
lan)
, acc
essi
bilit
y ab
sent
or i
nade
quat
e ph
ysic
al a
ctivi
ty, la
ck o
f prio
rity
in c
are,
de
man
d fo
r hea
lth s
ervic
es, d
ifficu
lties
with
edu
catio
n, a
cces
s -
lack
of i
nves
tmen
t in
educ
atio
n, a
cces
s to
soc
ial a
ssis
tanc
e -
acce
ss to
abs
ent o
r ins
uffic
ient
soc
ial b
enefi
ts, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ient
acc
ess
to p
rogr
ams
assi
stan
ce, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
ac
cess
to s
uppo
rt se
rvic
es (s
ocia
l ben
efit),
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of a
cces
s to
soc
ial g
oods
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of a
cces
s to
mat
eria
l goo
ds, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
acc
ess
to s
ymbo
lic g
oods
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of a
cces
s to
cul
ture
, ab
senc
e or
in
suffi
cien
cy o
f acc
ess
to ju
stic
e, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
acc
ess
to li
ght,
abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f acc
ess
to le
isur
e, la
ck o
f gr
een
spac
e, a
bsen
ce o
f opp
ortu
nitie
s in
the
labo
r mar
ket,
abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f wor
k op
portu
nitie
s, n
ot fi
ndin
g w
ork,
abs
ence
or
insu
ffici
ent a
cces
s to
regu
late
d w
ork.
Third
gen
erat
ion
fund
amen
tal r
ight
s: L
inke
d to
the
valu
es o
f fra
tern
ity o
r sol
idar
ity, t
hey
are
thos
e re
late
d to
dev
elop
men
t or p
rogr
ess,
the
envir
onm
ent,
the
self-
dete
rmin
atio
n of
pe
ople
s, a
s w
ell a
s th
e rig
ht to
pro
perty
ove
r the
com
mon
her
itage
of h
uman
ity a
nd th
e rig
ht o
f com
mun
icat
ion.
Lack
of o
r ins
uffic
ient
acc
ess
to c
omm
unic
atio
n, a
bsen
ce o
r lac
k of
acc
ess
to m
edia
and
abs
ence
or l
ack
of a
cces
s to
the
Inte
rnet
.
Four
th g
ener
atio
n fu
ndam
enta
l rig
hts:
The
y un
ders
tand
the
right
s to
dem
ocra
cy,
info
rmat
ion
and
plur
alis
m. T
his
right
is a
bout
the
futu
re o
f citi
zens
hip
and
the
prot
ectio
n of
lif
e fro
m th
e ge
netic
app
roac
h an
d its
cur
rent
con
sequ
ence
s.
Lack
of o
r ins
uffic
ient
acc
ess
to in
form
atio
n.
Cont
inue
...
Cont
inua
tion.
15Acta Paul Enferm. 2021; 34:eAPE00353.
Florêncio RS, Moreira TM
SOCI
AL
Conc
ept/C
onst
ituen
t Defi
nitio
nSu
bcon
cept
/Con
stitu
ent d
efini
tion
Oper
atio
nal d
efini
tion
Prog
ram
mat
ic s
ituat
ion
- em
phas
is o
n he
alth
: Cha
ract
eris
tics
and
proc
esse
s of
inst
itutio
ns th
at
prov
ide
diffe
rent
type
s of
ser
vices
to
the
popu
latio
n, e
spec
ially
thos
e re
late
d to
hea
lth.
Infr
astr
uctu
re: A
set
of e
lem
ents
that
ena
ble
the
prod
uctio
n of
goo
ds a
nd s
ervic
es.
Poor
gen
eral
infra
stru
ctur
e, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
edu
catio
nal m
ater
ial f
or p
reve
ntio
n, m
edic
atio
n no
t ass
ured
, abs
ence
or
insu
ffici
ency
of r
oom
to c
arry
out
edu
catio
nal a
ctivi
ties,
qua
ntity
of s
uppl
ies
abse
nt o
r ins
uffic
ient
, pro
blem
s of
sys
tem
s, a
vaila
bilit
y of
test
s de
crea
sed
or a
bsen
t, av
aila
bilit
y of
mat
eria
ls d
ecre
ased
or a
bsen
t, ab
senc
e or
insu
ffici
ency
in th
e di
strib
utio
n of
sup
plie
s,
abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f offi
ces
that
allo
w p
rivac
y, ab
senc
e or
insu
ffici
ency
of d
iagn
ostic
test
s of
fere
d by
the
serv
ice,
abs
ence
or
insu
ffici
ency
of o
fferin
g sp
ecifi
c te
sts,
non
-ava
ilabi
lity
of m
ater
ial f
or in
divid
ual u
se fo
r the
stra
tegy
of h
arm
redu
ctio
n, a
bsen
ce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f car
ryin
g ou
t any
exa
min
atio
n to
det
ect d
isea
se, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
car
ryin
g ou
t clin
ical
exa
min
atio
n,
abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f car
ryin
g ou
t tes
ts, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
car
ryin
g ou
t tre
atm
ent,
abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f sup
ply
of e
quip
men
t of i
ndivi
dual
pro
tect
ion
(PPE
), ab
senc
e or
insu
ffici
ent s
uppl
y of
det
ectio
n te
sts
for s
exua
lly tr
ansm
itted
infe
ctio
ns,
decr
ease
d or
abs
ent n
umbe
r of l
abor
ator
y te
sts,
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
nt tr
aini
ng, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ient
trai
ning
on
the
use
of
PPE,
defi
cien
cy in
thei
r tra
inin
g pr
ofes
sion
al, d
efici
enci
es in
the
assi
stan
ce m
odel
, defi
cit o
f pro
fess
iona
l kno
wle
dge,
defi
cit o
f pr
ofes
sion
als
in u
nder
stan
ding
peo
ple’
s so
cial
nee
ds, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
pro
fess
iona
ls tr
aine
d fo
r a s
peci
fic c
ondi
tion,
late
di
sclo
sure
of t
he d
isea
se, t
ype
of c
onsu
ltatio
n: q
uick
, with
out c
omm
unic
atio
n, w
ithou
t hum
aniza
tion
, pro
fess
iona
l wea
knes
ses,
un
prep
ared
ness
of p
rofe
ssio
nals
with
the
dise
ase,
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of p
repa
ring
a te
chni
cal o
pini
on o
n pr
even
tion
mat
eria
l, un
prep
ared
ness
in th
e ca
re o
f peo
ple
with
dis
abilit
ies,
tech
nica
l unp
repa
redn
ess,
sca
rcity
of s
cien
tific
info
rmat
ion,
em
otio
nal,
as
wel
l as
phys
ical
and
inte
llect
ual p
rofe
ssio
nal h
ealth
pro
fess
iona
ls, n
urse
s fo
cusi
ng o
n te
chno
logi
cal a
nd s
peci
alize
d as
pect
s of
car
e,
faci
ng d
ifficu
lties
in a
ppro
achi
ng p
atie
nts
in th
e fa
ce o
f dia
gnos
is, l
ack
of a
war
enes
s an
d tra
inin
g of
hea
lth p
rofe
ssio
nals
, lac
k of
in
vest
men
t in
thei
r pro
fess
iona
l qua
lifica
tion/
reha
bilit
atio
n.
Wor
king
pro
cess
: Pro
duct
of t
he a
rticu
latio
n of
soc
ial a
ctor
s in
ser
vices
(use
r, pr
ofes
sion
al
and
man
ager
) and
the
rela
tions
hip
esta
blis
hed
with
the
wor
k ob
ject
, on
whi
ch th
e w
orke
r’s
actio
n is
invo
lved.
Abse
nce
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f med
ical
or n
ursi
ng c
onsu
ltatio
n, c
are
not c
ente
red
on th
e pe
rson
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of c
are
for t
he
sick
chi
ld’s
fam
ily: n
urse
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of p
rimar
y he
alth
car
e, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
car
e w
ithin
ser
vices
, abs
ence
, in
suffi
cien
t or i
nade
quat
e ch
ild c
are,
pai
d ca
re, l
ack
of in
form
atio
n to
pat
ient
s ab
out p
roce
dure
s, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
act
ive
sear
ch fo
r fam
ily m
embe
rs, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
act
ive s
earc
h fo
r pat
ient
s, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
dis
ease
not
ifica
tion,
ab
senc
e or
insu
ffici
ency
of l
iste
ning
act
ive b
y pr
ofes
sion
als,
exc
essi
ve in
volve
men
t by
heal
th p
rofe
ssio
nals
, suf
ferin
g to
geth
er a
nd
putti
ng o
nese
lf in
pla
ce, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
hom
e vis
its a
nd th
e ap
proa
ch o
f the
hea
lth p
rofe
ssio
nal,
diss
atis
fact
ion
with
the
atte
ntio
n of
the
team
, nee
d to
impr
ove
the
qual
ity o
f car
e fo
r peo
ple
in h
omes
, pro
fess
iona
ls’ l
ack
of in
tere
st in
spe
cific
dem
ands
th
ose
of p
eopl
e, m
echa
niza
tion
of p
roce
dure
s ca
rried
out
by
prof
essi
onal
s, d
ifficu
lties
in p
rogr
ams
and
publ
ic p
olic
ies
with
rega
rd
to re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t and
com
mitm
ent t
o th
e or
gani
zatio
n, re
port
on h
ealth
con
ditio
ns in
citi
es b
y he
alth
ser
vices
, abs
ence
or
insu
ffici
ency
of q
ualit
y of
hea
lth s
ervic
es, a
bsen
ce o
r ins
uffic
ienc
y of
refe
renc
e/co
unte
r-re
fere
nce,
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of p
rofe
ssio
nals
follo
win
g pr
otoc
ols,
abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of b
iosa
fety
pro
toco
l, ab
senc
e or
insu
ffici
ency
of h
ealth
edu
catio
n pr
ogra
ms,
abs
ence
, ina
dequ
acy
or in
suffi
cien
cy o
f dis
ease
not
ifica
tion
flow,
org
aniza
tiona
l wea
knes
ses
in th
e he
alth
sys
tem
, ab
senc
e or
insu
ffici
ency
of a
ctive
and
effe
ctive
hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y co
mm
ittee
, abs
ence
or i
nsuf
ficie
ncy
of s
peci
fic p
rogr
ams,
abs
ence
or
insu
ffici
ency
of o
rgan
izatio
n co
nsul
tatio
n sc
hedu
le, h
igh
aver
age
test
resu
lts, l
ack
of in
stitu
tiona
l ass
ista
nce,
lack
of r
ecog
nitio
n in
hu
man
righ
ts s
ervic
es.
Stat
e: S
truct
ure,
i.e.
, the
larg
est
gove
rnm
enta
l ins
titut
ion
that
sho
uld
prov
ide
the
‘livin
g w
ell’
of th
ose
who
m
ake
up s
ocie
ty.
Publ
ic p
olic
ies:
A s
et o
f suc
cess
ive in
itiat
ives,
dec
isio
ns a
nd a
ctio
ns o
f the
pol
itica
l reg
ime
in th
e fa
ce o
f soc
ially
pro
blem
atic
situ
atio
ns th
at s
eek
to s
olve
them
, or a
t lea
st b
ring
them
to
man
aged
leve
ls.
Abse
nt o
r ins
uffic
ient
gov
ernm
ent a
nd p
ublic
hea
lth, a
bsen
t or i
nsuf
ficie
nt c
are
polic
ies.
Fina
ncin
g: S
ourc
es o
f res
ourc
es th
roug
h w
hich
exp
endi
ture
s ta
ke p
lace
in v
ario
us s
ecto
rs
of s
ocie
ty, in
clud
ing
heal
th.
Unde
rfund
ing
of th
e he
alth
sec
tor,
inad
equa
te re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t and
com
mitm
ent t
o or
gani
zatio
n.
Cont
inua
tion.