in smaller things forgotten: using microdebris to enhance our understanding of middle islamic dhiban...

24
1 In Smaller Things Forgotten: Using Microdebris to Enhance our Understanding of Middle Islamic Dhiban (Jordan) Nicholas P. Ames Presented at the SAA Annual Meeting in San Francisco, 2015 [SLIDE] In the era of exploring new uses for the ever growing array of digital phenomena, it is easy to forget that there is still much to be done in terms of streamlining our techniques for understanding hard, physical data. And while much has been dedicated to classification and analysis of the more visually obtrusive materials, the collective methods we have come to employ systematically neglects microartifacts despite their demonstrated significance. While the argument for the need to include microartifactual data in our investigations is not a new one, I feel the call for recognition of what can be contributed by this artifact type is one that needs constant reiteration as we begin to focus on nonEinvasive and comprehensive analytical techniques. The propensity of microartifacts to escape domestic cleaning, sweeping and postEdepositional activities result in an unintentional, yet perhaps more nuanced, patterning of human behavior of specific site areas. Thus, microartifacts fall right into this comprehensive niche of trending highE resolution digital methods, the differences being 1) it has always been available (i.e. not dependent on technological development); and 2) it is accessible through standard archaeological practices (i.e. not financially expensive or complicated to collect). So I hope to present to you briefly the continued importance of microartifacts in the archaeological record and the insight it can provide us, both within economic and socioE political contexts as well as regarding current methodological biases, using a case study at the tell site of Dhiban, Jordan.

Upload: nd

Post on 05-May-2023

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1""

In#Smaller#Things#Forgotten:##Using#Microdebris#to#Enhance#our#Understanding#of#Middle#Islamic#Dhiban#(Jordan)#

Nicholas)P.)Ames"Presented(at(the(SAA(Annual(Meeting(in(San(Francisco,(2015(

(

" [SLIDE]"In"the"era"of"exploring"new"uses"for"the"ever"growing"array"of"digital"

phenomena,"it"is"easy"to"forget"that"there"is"still"much"to"be"done"in"terms"of"streamlining"

our"techniques"for"understanding"hard,"physical"data."And"while"much"has"been"dedicated"

to"classification"and"analysis"of"the"more"visually"obtrusive"materials,"the"collective"

methods"we"have"come"to"employ"systematically"neglects"microartifacts"despite"their"

demonstrated"significance."While"the"argument"for"the"need"to"include"microartifactual"

data"in"our"investigations"is"not"a"new"one,"I"feel"the"call"for"recognition"of"what"can"be"

contributed"by"this"artifact"type"is"one"that"needs"constant"reiteration"as"we"begin"to"focus"

on"nonEinvasive"and"comprehensive"analytical"techniques."The"propensity"of"microartifacts"

to"escape"domestic"cleaning,"sweeping"and"postEdepositional"activities"result"in"an"

unintentional,"yet"perhaps"more"nuanced,"patterning"of"human"behavior"of"specific"site"

areas.""Thus,"microartifacts"fall"right"into"this"comprehensive"niche"of"trending"highE

resolution"digital"methods,"the"differences"being"1)"it"has"always"been"available"(i.e."not"

dependent"on"technological"development);"and"2)"it"is"accessible"through"standard"

archaeological"practices"(i.e."not"financially"expensive"or"complicated"to"collect)."""

So"I"hope"to"present"to"you"briefly"the"continued"importance"of"microartifacts"in"the"

archaeological"record"and"the"insight"it"can"provide"us,"both"within"economic"and"socioE

political"contexts"as"well"as"regarding"current"methodological"biases,"using"a"case"study"at"

the"tell"site"of"Dhiban,"Jordan.""

"

2""

[SLIDE]"To"put"the"study"into"a"social"and"economic"context,"the"site"of"Dhiban"is"

located"in"WestECentral"Jordan."[SLIDE]"It"is"perhaps"best"known"for"being"the"capital"of"the"

Iron"Age"polity"known"as"Moab,"its"history"made"famous"by"the"rediscovery"of"the"Mesha"

Inscription"in"1868."This"site"[SLIDE]"as"with"most"of"the"Levantine"region,"encompasses"an"

extremely"long"period"of"repeated"habitation,"occupied"intermittently"for"almost"5,000"

years"by"both"local"and"foreign"political"entities"beginning"during"the"Bronze"Age"and"

continuing"into"the"present."Despite"this"repeated,"intensive"use,"high"levels"of"output"

would"have"been"difficult"to"maintain"given"Dhiban’s"semiEarid"environment."[SLIDE]"The"

plateau"receives"approximately"250"mm"of"precipitation"during"the"winter"growing"

months,"barely"enough"for"rainEfed"grain"production."Soil"beds"that"have"not"been"eroded"

are"only"average"in"production"quality."This"unideal"situation"gives"rise"to"many"questions"

regarding"the"sustainability"of"this"historic"town,"not"only"in"producing"for"immediate"

social"needs,"but"in"adapting"to"regional"economic"intensification"and"imperial"and"market"

demands."While"this"presentation"won’t"be"addressing"these"questions"directly,"such"

answers"are"the"aim"of"the"larger"Dhiban"Exploration"and"Development"Project.""

[SLIDE]"My"study"in"particular"focuses"on"a"multiEphase"Middle"Islamic"domestic"

occupation"occurring"near"the"top"of"the"tell,"dating"to"the"13thE15th"centuries"CE.""

"

[SLIDE]"The"samples"I"used"were"collected"with"the"intent"of"mitigating"

unsymmetrical"deposition"and"subjected"to"flotation"in"order"to"separate"the"heavy"from"

light"fraction."Once"dried,"the"heavy"fraction"was"sorted"using"geologic"sieves"in"intervals"

down"to"4mm"in"size."The"remaining"unsorted"microdebris"(the"residual"material"smaller"

3""than"4mm)"was"then"collected"for"comparative"analysis"alongside"the"standard"heavy"

fraction"materials.""

"

To"address"the"issue"of"timeEcost"often"associated"with"a"microartifacual"study,"I"conducted"

an"initial"pilot"study"that"split"several"microEdebris"samples"into"standardized"subEsamples"

of"100mL,"and"then"analyzed"each"of"the"subE"samples"autonomously,"before"crossE

comparing"the"results."The"result"was"a"94E96%"correlation"between"the"count,"weight"and"

presence"of"specific"material"types"occurring"in"all"of"the"correlating"subEsamples."Thus"I"

concluded"that"I"was"able"to"only"analyze"a"single"subEsample"from"a"unit"and"still"get"an"

accurate"proportional"representation"of"the"types"of"microEmaterials"present"throughout"

the"entirety"of"the"sample."""

" [SLIDE]"For"the"rest"of"the"analytical"process,"16"microEdebris"samples"were"selected"

from"the"103"analyzed"heavy"fraction"samples,"and"were"reEsieved"in"the"laboratory"

through"2mm"and"1mm"meshes."The"total"samples"were"then"weighed,"measured"by"

volume,"riffled,"and"then"subEsampled"to"50ml"(for"the"1mm"material)"or"100ml"(for"the"

2mm"material)"of"preEsorted"sediment."In"total,"I"counted"11,119"items"of"interest"(either"

an"artifact"or"ecoEfact)"distributed"within"the"16"samples,"with"2469"of"these"occurring"in"

the"2mm"and"8650"in"the"1mm"material."The"average"densities"of"the"counts"per"mL"for"the"

2mm"microE"artifacts"were"determined"to"be"1.05"items"per"mL,"and"5.75"items"per"mL"for"

the"1mm"materials,"respectively."[SLIDE]"When"considering"the"relative"standard"error"of"

count"density"by"sample"number"and"artifact"type,"we"see"a"similar"consistency"between"

the"individual"samples"and"their"respective"artifacts"and"ecofacts."Ultimately,"we"decided"to"

base"our"interpretations"on"ubiquity"and"artifact"density"by"weight"rather"than"item"count"

4""because"of"the"variability"in"breakage"patterns"that"characterize"different"materials."For"

example,"ceramic"is"highly"durable,"and"therefore"does"not"fracture"to"the"microE"scale"as"

does"other"material"types"such"as"eggshell."Similarly,"the"fracturing"patterns"of"bone"causes"

small"fragments"to"flake"off"more"frequently,"therefore"resulting"in"a"single"bone"producing"

hundreds"of"fragments"that"appear"in"the"microEdebris."[SLIDE]"By"also"basing"our"study"on"

density"by"weight,"we"are"able"to"account"for"countEbias"by"viewing"the"material"

proportionally"based"on"presence"in"densityEvolume"compared"to"other"materials"collected"

(an"example"of"the"variability"in"item"count"appearing"in"the"various"fraction"sizes"is"shown"

in"this"slide"here)."

"

" [SLIDE]"What"this"study"found"is"that"there"are"different"types"of"artifacts"present"

between"the"micro"and"macro"sample"sizes."For"example,"whereas"marine"taxa"(e.g."fish)"

are"relatively"absent"in"the"larger"fraction"sizes,"their"presence"increases"in"the"smaller"

fraction"sizes."Similarly,"eggshell"is"nearly"absent"in"the"larger"fraction"sizes"yet"it"is"nearly"

ubiquitous"in"the"2mm"and"1mm"fraction"sizes."Conversely,"ceramics"dominate"the"larger"

fraction"sizes,"yet"are"limited"among"the"1mm"and"2mm"sized"artifacts."[SLIDE]"Looking"

specifically"at"the"presence"of"fish"remains"within"the"samples,"we"see"as"many"fish"remains"

appearing"in"1mm"and"2mm"sizes"only,"as"we"do"in"the"entirety"of"the"16"associated"larger"

fraction"sizes."

"

Because"Dhiban"is"located"in"a"semiEarid"climatic"zone"distant"from"any"major"water"

sources,"it"seems"logical"that"tax"documents"from"the"Middle"Islamic"period"seldom"

mention"fish."But"the"ubiquity"of"small"fish"remains"seen"here"implies"repeated"successful"

5""fish"capture,"perhaps"by"netting,"rather"than"the"occasional"capture"of"large"organisms."

Therefore,"these"microEdebris"provide"insight"into"movement"across"the"landscape"to"

perennial"water"sources,"or"techniques"of"intensive"procurement"(netting)"of"possible"

consumption"or"trade"items."""

" [SLIDE]"On"a"wider"scale,"Dhiban"is"also"located"directly"on"top"of"the"King’s"Highway,"

one"of"the"main"NorthESouth"trade"routes"that"ran"from"Aqaba"to"Damascus,"present"as"

early"as"the"Middle"to"Late"Bronze"Age"(around"1700"BCE)."Because"of"this"routine"

accessibility"and"the"persistent"Transjordanian"structural"fluidity,"at"least"a"portion"of"the"

trade"that"was"occurring"at"Dhiban"would"have"been"with"caravans"traveling"along"this"

major"route,"which"carried"‘oriental’"goods"on"their"way"to"Egypt"and"Syria."The"numbers"in"

these"caravans"were"often"large,"and"on"many"occasions"numbered"between"18,000"and"

20,000"camels.""

Though"small"trade"did"occur"around"the"Dead"Sea"(the"closest"body"of"water"to"Dhiban)"in"

the"form"of"bitumen,"salt,"dry"desert"fruits"such"as"apharsimon"and"dates,"as"well"as"

freshwater"resources"collected"from"tributaries"feeding"into"the"sea"(such"as"the"Wadi"Wala"

and"Wadi"alEMujib),"harvesting"from"its"waters"would"have"proved"to"be"more"of"a"

hindrance"than"benefit"in"the"case"of"economics."This"is"due"to"the"size"of"the"sea"(in"terms"

of"the"landscape’s"impact"on"social"and"economic"development)"and,"as"implied"by"its"

name,"deadly"content"of"the"water"(with"an"average"salinity"of"33.7%)."To"put"it"into"

perspective,"this"is"8½"times"saltier"than"the"Pacific"Ocean,"which"is"an"average"of"3.5%"

salinity.""

" [SLIDE]"As"a"result,"finding"marine"shell"in"the"storeroom"(in"conjunction"with"the"

rest"of"the"artifact"assemblage)"is"likely"a"reflection"of"the"aforementioned"commerce,"as"

6""the"shells"themselves"are"a"presumed"product"of"the"distant"Red"Sea."

These"marine"items"are,"with"a"few"exceptions,"unrepresented"in"the"larger"fraction"sizes."

[SLIDE]"(One"exception"being"a"pharyngeal"grinding"mill"from"the"parrotfish"family"

Scaridae"found"most"commonly"in"the"IndioEPacific,"and"not"at"all"in"the"nearby"

Mediterranean"during"that"time)."

" In"focusing"on"a"particular"material"type"(i.e."fish)"it"can"thus"be"demonstrated"that"

without"this"analysis,"the"extent"of"these"types"of"procurement"and"processing"at"Dhiban"

would"have"been"vastly"underestimated."If"one"relies"solely"on"the"macroEmaterial"from"

these"samples"to"determine"spatial"activities"within"the"site,"it"would"lead"to"a"much"

different"understanding"of"area"use"than"when"the"microEmaterial"is"taken"into"

consideration."The"entirety"of"the"data"E"especially"the"presence"on"microEdebris"–"in"part"

changes"the"interpretation"and"scope"of"activities"occurring"on"site."Due"to"the"qualitative"

variation"of"material"types"appearing"in"the"microdebris"versus"that"that"found"in"the"larger"

fractions,"I"argue"that"there"is"high"value"in"smaller"fraction"sizes"in"aiding"in"the"

interpretation"of"onEsite"activities.""

This"discrepancy,"however,"goes"both"ways."The"near"absence"of"other"ecoE"and"artifact"

types,"such"as"ceramics,"in"the"minute"portions"of"the"samples"reminds"us"that"the"use"of"

microEdebris"as"an"analytical"tool"must"be"done"in"conjunction"with"the"standard"analysis"

of"heavy"fraction"material,"not"as"a"substitution."""

Another"unpleasant"revelation"resulting"from"using"microartifact"analysis"is"that"it"

highlights"subtle"biases"occurring"in"other"sample"and"analytical"techniques."

[SLIDE]"The"most"obvious"example"of"this"is"the"ubiquitous"presence"of"charcoal"and"the"

occasional"carbonized"seed"in"the"microartifact"2"and"1mm"samples."Because"the"collection"

7""technique"for"this"data"is"done"most"easily"in"conjunction"with"the"light"fraction"botanical"

collection"by"flotation,"subsequent"nonEthorough"agitation"of"the"flot"sample,"or"simply"

stubborn"carbonized"remains"that"do"not"escape"the"‘heavy’"part"of"the"sample,"cause"a"

degree"of"overlap"between"the"sample"contents"and"result"in"an"incomplete"analysis"of"the"

intended"data."This"can"cause"issues"when"using"raw"counts"or"weights"to"determine"

density"distribution"of"sample"types.""

"

It"is"as"much"for"this"identification"of"other"innate"analytical"issues"as"for"the"

nuanced"contribution"to"our"understanding"of"the"economic"relationships"and"structural"

use"of"space"that"microdebris"should"be"one"of"the"staples"in"establishing"site"histories"and"

social"frameworks"in"the"archaeological"record.""

By"using"this"data"type"in"conjunction"with"more"common"analytical"methods,"we"can"

further"work"to"mitigate"these"biases"and"elucidate"the"subtle"aspects"of"the"historical"

record"that"act"as"the"foundation"of"everyday"experiences."As"archaeology"works"towards"a"

more"informed"and"controlled"means"of"investigating"our"historical"matter,"we"must"focus"

ourselves"on"gaining"as"much"from"existing"data"as"possible"as"we"are"on"developing"new"

techniques"to"investigate"that"past."[SLIDE]"

Thank"you."

(http://www.thenew

sking.com/paris-m

usee-du-louvre-stele-de-mesha/)

Iron Age

Periods of Occupation at Dhiban

Nabataean / Roman Period Middle Islamic PeriodByzantine Period

Present

1950 CE1200 CE650 CE100 CE1000 BCE3000 BCE

Bronze Age Iron Age “Classical”

323 BCE

Early Middle

1550 CE5000 BCE

Chalcolithic

9000 BCE

NeolithicPaleolithic Late

Moabite Roman Byzantine UmayyadAbbasidFatimid

CrusaderAyyubidMamluk

(Photo by Ben Porter, 2005)

Iron Age

Periods of Occupation at Dhiban

Nabataean / Roman Period Middle Islamic PeriodByzantine Period

Present

1950 CE1200 CE650 CE100 CE1000 BCE3000 BCE

Bronze Age Iron Age “Classical”

323 BCE

Early Middle

1550 CE5000 BCE

Chalcolithic

9000 BCE

NeolithicPaleolithic Late

Moabite Roman Byzantine UmayyadAbbasidFatimid

CrusaderAyyubidMamluk

Sampling(Farahani, unpublished 2012)

Flotation

Processing

Artifact 1mm Count Density (n=8)

Ecofact 1mm Count Density (n=8)

Artifact 2mm Count Density (n=8)

Ecofact 2mm Count Density (n=8)

MicroartifactsRelative Standard Error

VsNumber of subsamples(Based on count density)

Proportion of Material Count in each Fraction Size (n=16)

n=16

Main Trading Routes of the Levant – The King’s Highway is in bright red

Dhiban

Dead Sea

Red Sea

Excavation Phase 2D Surface

‘Bin’ ‘Tabun’

Ubiquities of microdebris items (n=16)

Dr. Benjamin Porter, Dr. Lisa Maher,Dr. Alan Farahani, Hanna Huynh,

the UC Berkeley McCown ArchaeobotanyLaboratory (PI Christine Hastorf),

the Dhiban Excavation and Development Project, and URAP Students:

Daniela Alaniz-Roux, Kyleigh Suro,Paquita Esterly, and Ryan Poska