in smaller things forgotten: using microdebris to enhance our understanding of middle islamic dhiban...
TRANSCRIPT
1""
In#Smaller#Things#Forgotten:##Using#Microdebris#to#Enhance#our#Understanding#of#Middle#Islamic#Dhiban#(Jordan)#
Nicholas)P.)Ames"Presented(at(the(SAA(Annual(Meeting(in(San(Francisco,(2015(
(
" [SLIDE]"In"the"era"of"exploring"new"uses"for"the"ever"growing"array"of"digital"
phenomena,"it"is"easy"to"forget"that"there"is"still"much"to"be"done"in"terms"of"streamlining"
our"techniques"for"understanding"hard,"physical"data."And"while"much"has"been"dedicated"
to"classification"and"analysis"of"the"more"visually"obtrusive"materials,"the"collective"
methods"we"have"come"to"employ"systematically"neglects"microartifacts"despite"their"
demonstrated"significance."While"the"argument"for"the"need"to"include"microartifactual"
data"in"our"investigations"is"not"a"new"one,"I"feel"the"call"for"recognition"of"what"can"be"
contributed"by"this"artifact"type"is"one"that"needs"constant"reiteration"as"we"begin"to"focus"
on"nonEinvasive"and"comprehensive"analytical"techniques."The"propensity"of"microartifacts"
to"escape"domestic"cleaning,"sweeping"and"postEdepositional"activities"result"in"an"
unintentional,"yet"perhaps"more"nuanced,"patterning"of"human"behavior"of"specific"site"
areas.""Thus,"microartifacts"fall"right"into"this"comprehensive"niche"of"trending"highE
resolution"digital"methods,"the"differences"being"1)"it"has"always"been"available"(i.e."not"
dependent"on"technological"development);"and"2)"it"is"accessible"through"standard"
archaeological"practices"(i.e."not"financially"expensive"or"complicated"to"collect)."""
So"I"hope"to"present"to"you"briefly"the"continued"importance"of"microartifacts"in"the"
archaeological"record"and"the"insight"it"can"provide"us,"both"within"economic"and"socioE
political"contexts"as"well"as"regarding"current"methodological"biases,"using"a"case"study"at"
the"tell"site"of"Dhiban,"Jordan.""
"
2""
[SLIDE]"To"put"the"study"into"a"social"and"economic"context,"the"site"of"Dhiban"is"
located"in"WestECentral"Jordan."[SLIDE]"It"is"perhaps"best"known"for"being"the"capital"of"the"
Iron"Age"polity"known"as"Moab,"its"history"made"famous"by"the"rediscovery"of"the"Mesha"
Inscription"in"1868."This"site"[SLIDE]"as"with"most"of"the"Levantine"region,"encompasses"an"
extremely"long"period"of"repeated"habitation,"occupied"intermittently"for"almost"5,000"
years"by"both"local"and"foreign"political"entities"beginning"during"the"Bronze"Age"and"
continuing"into"the"present."Despite"this"repeated,"intensive"use,"high"levels"of"output"
would"have"been"difficult"to"maintain"given"Dhiban’s"semiEarid"environment."[SLIDE]"The"
plateau"receives"approximately"250"mm"of"precipitation"during"the"winter"growing"
months,"barely"enough"for"rainEfed"grain"production."Soil"beds"that"have"not"been"eroded"
are"only"average"in"production"quality."This"unideal"situation"gives"rise"to"many"questions"
regarding"the"sustainability"of"this"historic"town,"not"only"in"producing"for"immediate"
social"needs,"but"in"adapting"to"regional"economic"intensification"and"imperial"and"market"
demands."While"this"presentation"won’t"be"addressing"these"questions"directly,"such"
answers"are"the"aim"of"the"larger"Dhiban"Exploration"and"Development"Project.""
[SLIDE]"My"study"in"particular"focuses"on"a"multiEphase"Middle"Islamic"domestic"
occupation"occurring"near"the"top"of"the"tell,"dating"to"the"13thE15th"centuries"CE.""
"
[SLIDE]"The"samples"I"used"were"collected"with"the"intent"of"mitigating"
unsymmetrical"deposition"and"subjected"to"flotation"in"order"to"separate"the"heavy"from"
light"fraction."Once"dried,"the"heavy"fraction"was"sorted"using"geologic"sieves"in"intervals"
down"to"4mm"in"size."The"remaining"unsorted"microdebris"(the"residual"material"smaller"
3""than"4mm)"was"then"collected"for"comparative"analysis"alongside"the"standard"heavy"
fraction"materials.""
"
To"address"the"issue"of"timeEcost"often"associated"with"a"microartifacual"study,"I"conducted"
an"initial"pilot"study"that"split"several"microEdebris"samples"into"standardized"subEsamples"
of"100mL,"and"then"analyzed"each"of"the"subE"samples"autonomously,"before"crossE
comparing"the"results."The"result"was"a"94E96%"correlation"between"the"count,"weight"and"
presence"of"specific"material"types"occurring"in"all"of"the"correlating"subEsamples."Thus"I"
concluded"that"I"was"able"to"only"analyze"a"single"subEsample"from"a"unit"and"still"get"an"
accurate"proportional"representation"of"the"types"of"microEmaterials"present"throughout"
the"entirety"of"the"sample."""
" [SLIDE]"For"the"rest"of"the"analytical"process,"16"microEdebris"samples"were"selected"
from"the"103"analyzed"heavy"fraction"samples,"and"were"reEsieved"in"the"laboratory"
through"2mm"and"1mm"meshes."The"total"samples"were"then"weighed,"measured"by"
volume,"riffled,"and"then"subEsampled"to"50ml"(for"the"1mm"material)"or"100ml"(for"the"
2mm"material)"of"preEsorted"sediment."In"total,"I"counted"11,119"items"of"interest"(either"
an"artifact"or"ecoEfact)"distributed"within"the"16"samples,"with"2469"of"these"occurring"in"
the"2mm"and"8650"in"the"1mm"material."The"average"densities"of"the"counts"per"mL"for"the"
2mm"microE"artifacts"were"determined"to"be"1.05"items"per"mL,"and"5.75"items"per"mL"for"
the"1mm"materials,"respectively."[SLIDE]"When"considering"the"relative"standard"error"of"
count"density"by"sample"number"and"artifact"type,"we"see"a"similar"consistency"between"
the"individual"samples"and"their"respective"artifacts"and"ecofacts."Ultimately,"we"decided"to"
base"our"interpretations"on"ubiquity"and"artifact"density"by"weight"rather"than"item"count"
4""because"of"the"variability"in"breakage"patterns"that"characterize"different"materials."For"
example,"ceramic"is"highly"durable,"and"therefore"does"not"fracture"to"the"microE"scale"as"
does"other"material"types"such"as"eggshell."Similarly,"the"fracturing"patterns"of"bone"causes"
small"fragments"to"flake"off"more"frequently,"therefore"resulting"in"a"single"bone"producing"
hundreds"of"fragments"that"appear"in"the"microEdebris."[SLIDE]"By"also"basing"our"study"on"
density"by"weight,"we"are"able"to"account"for"countEbias"by"viewing"the"material"
proportionally"based"on"presence"in"densityEvolume"compared"to"other"materials"collected"
(an"example"of"the"variability"in"item"count"appearing"in"the"various"fraction"sizes"is"shown"
in"this"slide"here)."
"
" [SLIDE]"What"this"study"found"is"that"there"are"different"types"of"artifacts"present"
between"the"micro"and"macro"sample"sizes."For"example,"whereas"marine"taxa"(e.g."fish)"
are"relatively"absent"in"the"larger"fraction"sizes,"their"presence"increases"in"the"smaller"
fraction"sizes."Similarly,"eggshell"is"nearly"absent"in"the"larger"fraction"sizes"yet"it"is"nearly"
ubiquitous"in"the"2mm"and"1mm"fraction"sizes."Conversely,"ceramics"dominate"the"larger"
fraction"sizes,"yet"are"limited"among"the"1mm"and"2mm"sized"artifacts."[SLIDE]"Looking"
specifically"at"the"presence"of"fish"remains"within"the"samples,"we"see"as"many"fish"remains"
appearing"in"1mm"and"2mm"sizes"only,"as"we"do"in"the"entirety"of"the"16"associated"larger"
fraction"sizes."
"
Because"Dhiban"is"located"in"a"semiEarid"climatic"zone"distant"from"any"major"water"
sources,"it"seems"logical"that"tax"documents"from"the"Middle"Islamic"period"seldom"
mention"fish."But"the"ubiquity"of"small"fish"remains"seen"here"implies"repeated"successful"
5""fish"capture,"perhaps"by"netting,"rather"than"the"occasional"capture"of"large"organisms."
Therefore,"these"microEdebris"provide"insight"into"movement"across"the"landscape"to"
perennial"water"sources,"or"techniques"of"intensive"procurement"(netting)"of"possible"
consumption"or"trade"items."""
" [SLIDE]"On"a"wider"scale,"Dhiban"is"also"located"directly"on"top"of"the"King’s"Highway,"
one"of"the"main"NorthESouth"trade"routes"that"ran"from"Aqaba"to"Damascus,"present"as"
early"as"the"Middle"to"Late"Bronze"Age"(around"1700"BCE)."Because"of"this"routine"
accessibility"and"the"persistent"Transjordanian"structural"fluidity,"at"least"a"portion"of"the"
trade"that"was"occurring"at"Dhiban"would"have"been"with"caravans"traveling"along"this"
major"route,"which"carried"‘oriental’"goods"on"their"way"to"Egypt"and"Syria."The"numbers"in"
these"caravans"were"often"large,"and"on"many"occasions"numbered"between"18,000"and"
20,000"camels.""
Though"small"trade"did"occur"around"the"Dead"Sea"(the"closest"body"of"water"to"Dhiban)"in"
the"form"of"bitumen,"salt,"dry"desert"fruits"such"as"apharsimon"and"dates,"as"well"as"
freshwater"resources"collected"from"tributaries"feeding"into"the"sea"(such"as"the"Wadi"Wala"
and"Wadi"alEMujib),"harvesting"from"its"waters"would"have"proved"to"be"more"of"a"
hindrance"than"benefit"in"the"case"of"economics."This"is"due"to"the"size"of"the"sea"(in"terms"
of"the"landscape’s"impact"on"social"and"economic"development)"and,"as"implied"by"its"
name,"deadly"content"of"the"water"(with"an"average"salinity"of"33.7%)."To"put"it"into"
perspective,"this"is"8½"times"saltier"than"the"Pacific"Ocean,"which"is"an"average"of"3.5%"
salinity.""
" [SLIDE]"As"a"result,"finding"marine"shell"in"the"storeroom"(in"conjunction"with"the"
rest"of"the"artifact"assemblage)"is"likely"a"reflection"of"the"aforementioned"commerce,"as"
6""the"shells"themselves"are"a"presumed"product"of"the"distant"Red"Sea."
These"marine"items"are,"with"a"few"exceptions,"unrepresented"in"the"larger"fraction"sizes."
[SLIDE]"(One"exception"being"a"pharyngeal"grinding"mill"from"the"parrotfish"family"
Scaridae"found"most"commonly"in"the"IndioEPacific,"and"not"at"all"in"the"nearby"
Mediterranean"during"that"time)."
" In"focusing"on"a"particular"material"type"(i.e."fish)"it"can"thus"be"demonstrated"that"
without"this"analysis,"the"extent"of"these"types"of"procurement"and"processing"at"Dhiban"
would"have"been"vastly"underestimated."If"one"relies"solely"on"the"macroEmaterial"from"
these"samples"to"determine"spatial"activities"within"the"site,"it"would"lead"to"a"much"
different"understanding"of"area"use"than"when"the"microEmaterial"is"taken"into"
consideration."The"entirety"of"the"data"E"especially"the"presence"on"microEdebris"–"in"part"
changes"the"interpretation"and"scope"of"activities"occurring"on"site."Due"to"the"qualitative"
variation"of"material"types"appearing"in"the"microdebris"versus"that"that"found"in"the"larger"
fractions,"I"argue"that"there"is"high"value"in"smaller"fraction"sizes"in"aiding"in"the"
interpretation"of"onEsite"activities.""
This"discrepancy,"however,"goes"both"ways."The"near"absence"of"other"ecoE"and"artifact"
types,"such"as"ceramics,"in"the"minute"portions"of"the"samples"reminds"us"that"the"use"of"
microEdebris"as"an"analytical"tool"must"be"done"in"conjunction"with"the"standard"analysis"
of"heavy"fraction"material,"not"as"a"substitution."""
Another"unpleasant"revelation"resulting"from"using"microartifact"analysis"is"that"it"
highlights"subtle"biases"occurring"in"other"sample"and"analytical"techniques."
[SLIDE]"The"most"obvious"example"of"this"is"the"ubiquitous"presence"of"charcoal"and"the"
occasional"carbonized"seed"in"the"microartifact"2"and"1mm"samples."Because"the"collection"
7""technique"for"this"data"is"done"most"easily"in"conjunction"with"the"light"fraction"botanical"
collection"by"flotation,"subsequent"nonEthorough"agitation"of"the"flot"sample,"or"simply"
stubborn"carbonized"remains"that"do"not"escape"the"‘heavy’"part"of"the"sample,"cause"a"
degree"of"overlap"between"the"sample"contents"and"result"in"an"incomplete"analysis"of"the"
intended"data."This"can"cause"issues"when"using"raw"counts"or"weights"to"determine"
density"distribution"of"sample"types.""
"
It"is"as"much"for"this"identification"of"other"innate"analytical"issues"as"for"the"
nuanced"contribution"to"our"understanding"of"the"economic"relationships"and"structural"
use"of"space"that"microdebris"should"be"one"of"the"staples"in"establishing"site"histories"and"
social"frameworks"in"the"archaeological"record.""
By"using"this"data"type"in"conjunction"with"more"common"analytical"methods,"we"can"
further"work"to"mitigate"these"biases"and"elucidate"the"subtle"aspects"of"the"historical"
record"that"act"as"the"foundation"of"everyday"experiences."As"archaeology"works"towards"a"
more"informed"and"controlled"means"of"investigating"our"historical"matter,"we"must"focus"
ourselves"on"gaining"as"much"from"existing"data"as"possible"as"we"are"on"developing"new"
techniques"to"investigate"that"past."[SLIDE]"
Thank"you."
Iron Age
Periods of Occupation at Dhiban
Nabataean / Roman Period Middle Islamic PeriodByzantine Period
Present
1950 CE1200 CE650 CE100 CE1000 BCE3000 BCE
Bronze Age Iron Age “Classical”
323 BCE
Early Middle
1550 CE5000 BCE
Chalcolithic
9000 BCE
NeolithicPaleolithic Late
Moabite Roman Byzantine UmayyadAbbasidFatimid
CrusaderAyyubidMamluk
Iron Age
Periods of Occupation at Dhiban
Nabataean / Roman Period Middle Islamic PeriodByzantine Period
Present
1950 CE1200 CE650 CE100 CE1000 BCE3000 BCE
Bronze Age Iron Age “Classical”
323 BCE
Early Middle
1550 CE5000 BCE
Chalcolithic
9000 BCE
NeolithicPaleolithic Late
Moabite Roman Byzantine UmayyadAbbasidFatimid
CrusaderAyyubidMamluk
Artifact 1mm Count Density (n=8)
Ecofact 1mm Count Density (n=8)
Artifact 2mm Count Density (n=8)
Ecofact 2mm Count Density (n=8)
MicroartifactsRelative Standard Error
VsNumber of subsamples(Based on count density)