fire pre-plans - marsh

Energy Practice

RISK ENGINEERING POSITION PAPER – 02

FIRE PRE-PLANS

ii • Fire Pre-plans

March 2011

ii • Fire Pre-plans

Marsh • iii

RISK ENGINEERING POSITION PAPER

Section Title ............................................................................................................................. Page

1. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1

2. Objective ......................................................................................................................................... 1

3. Scope ............................................................................................................................................... 1

4. General Principles ............................................................................................................................ 1

5. Specific Requirements ..................................................................................................................... 2

5.1 Policy and Procedure ....................................................................................................................... 2

5.2 Ownership and Development .......................................................................................................... 2

5.3 Fire Pre-plan Portfolio ...................................................................................................................... 2

5.4 Format and Content ......................................................................................................................... 3

5.5 Drills ................................................................................................................................................ 4

5.6 Distribution ...................................................................................................................................... 4

6. Reference to Industry Losses ............................................................................................................ 5

7. Reference to Industry Standards ...................................................................................................... 5

8. Appendices ...................................................................................................................................... 6

CONTENTS

1 • Fire Pre-plans

March 2011

1. BACKGROUNDThe potential for major fires in any installation that handles large quantities of hydrocarbon

products is self-evident. There have been numerous large damaging fires over the years and

these include tank fires which involve massive product losses and process unit fires which cause

major plant damage and process interruption.

2. OBJECTIVEThe objective of this position paper is to define the standards that would be expected of a very

good level of fire pre-plans in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industry. These standards are also

reflected in the Marsh energy risk ranking criteria. They can be used to support and define risk

improvement recommendations and also to provide detailed advice to clients seeking to

improve their fire protection and emergency response systems.

3. SCOPEThe scope of this position paper includes the description and purpose, the ownership and

development, and the format and content of fire pre-plans. It is applicable to any facility

handling hydrocarbons and toxic materials.

4. GENERAL PRINCIPLESPlants are normally designed, built, and operated to avoid fires by controlling the basic causes;

loss of containment and ignition. They are also provided with detection and alarm systems to

promote early response and intervention. Finally, there are passive and active fire protection

facilities, and emergency response systems and resources, to be used as a final barrier to

prevent or minimise the consequences.

A fire pre-plan is a scenario based plan, specific to a particular process area or equipment item.

All fire pre-plans should be referenced in the site emergency response plan. They should

describe how the fire protection and emergency response systems are to be used in specific fire

case scenarios. Fire pre-plans should take into account the nature and likely effects of the fire

scenario, the materials involved (process materials and plant construction materials), the

surrounding environment, including plant layout, any special hazards pertaining to that area,

and the resources available.

Fire pre-plans should be used to assess the resources required. They should be used for regular

training and drills, and reviewed and updated after each event. Fire protection systems and

emergency response resources (equipment and personnel) are generally designed to cope with

the greatest demand they are likely to face. At a given site, the controlling scenario is generally

referred to as the fire case. Whilst a lot of attention is paid to this as it underpins the basic

design requirements of the central fire protection systems, there are other cases that need also

to be studied to ensure the site is prepared for a range of eventualities.

Marsh • 2


5.1 POLICY AND PROCEDUREThe Health, Safety and Environment Management System

(HSE-MS) should include the procedure for the

development and application of fire pre-plans. A copy of

the fire pre-plans should be included in the emergency

procedures manual for the site. Fire pre-plans should be

managed in the same way as all other controlled

documents.

Corporate standards for fire pre-plans should be available

to member sites.

5.2 OWNERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENTFire pre-plans should be owned by the emergency

response organisation at the site. There should be input

from all involved and affected groups and disciplines,

particularly the operations teams. Where the external/

local fire brigade plays a significant part in the emergency

response, they should be familiar with the fire pre-plans.

Specific evacuation plans, muster points, headcount, etc.

should be covered under a separate procedure in the site

emergency response plans.

By definition, a fire pre-plan is a “desk-top” derived plan,

with additional input from exercise and incident feedback.

The pre-plan is best developed by a team effort. Team

members should include:

• Person responsible for site tactical emergency response

team e.g. fire chief/fire engineer.

• Person responsible for first-line response e.g. shift

supervisor.

• Operations representative - area specific.

• Firefighting team representative.

• Risk engineer.

• Safety officer.

The pre-plan should be seen as an evaluation of the type of

response required for typical scenarios. In the event of an

actual incident, the pre-plan should be seen as a guide and

would need to be adjusted to suit local factors, e.g.

weather conditions, actual process conditions. The fire pre-

plan acts as an aide-memoire in crisis situations where

rational thinking time could be limited. The development

of a fire pre-plan may also highlight where there may be

deficiencies in response capability or particular problems

with the subject scenario.

Scenarios to be documented should be as comprehensive

as time and resource allows. Good starting points are

events typically highlighted in a safety case, or by high-

level unit assessment looking at other property damage

events.

5.3 FIRE PRE-PLAN PORTFOLIOA comprehensive portfolio of fire pre-plans should include:

• A fire pre-plan for each major storage tank and each

bund area (although these can often be combined for

identical tanks in a single local area).

• A fire pre-plan for each pressurised storage vessel and

containment area, including protection of the run-off

and impounding area, and key steps to avoid a boiling

liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE).

• A fire pre-plan for refrigerated storage tanks including

protection of the run-off and impounding area.

• A fire pre-plan for each berth at the marine terminal.

• A fire pre-plan for each rail and truck loading gantry.

• A fire pre-plan for each defined “fire area” of the unit e.g.

as limited by layout/drainage where this is practical/

meaningful. At least the two or three most severe fire

cases for each process unit should be defined.

• Any other specific cases that are equivalent to one of the

above.

5. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS


March 2011

5.4 FORMAT AND CONTENTThe plans are best represented on easy-reference A3 size documents, using a standard

layout. Data should be included on the diagrams where possible. Lengthy narrative should

be avoided and reference should be made to supporting documentation.

The Pre-plans should include the following:

SECTION DESCRIPTION

Header Date, revision, author, and approver.

Incident Description Unit/section/equipment item/scenario.

Equipment and

Contents Description

Size: Volume, diameter, height or length.

Contents: Quantity, chemical description, and properties, e.g.

flash point, auto ignition temperature.

Toxic risk – including carcinogens such as Benzene and Asbestos

explosion risk, e.g. Vapor Cloud Explosions (VCE), BLEVE,

detonation.

environmental impact and odour risk.

Boil-over risk.

Dispersion and cloud characteristics.

Equipment and other units also at risk.

Third party locations at risk.

Special Hazards Location of radioactive instrumentation elements.

Location of electrical equipment with polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB).

Location of equipment with water reactive chemicals.

High pressure gas cylinders.

Operations Response Key operations response actions, e.g. shutdown, depressurisation

and isolation, evacuations, remote activation of deluge/monitors

etc.

Where possible the number of key actions should be limited to

around five to avoid excessive detail; they should also take into

account the nature of the emergency e.g. it may be necessary to

shut down a pump with a leaking seal from the switch house

rather than the local stop/start button.

Tactical Emergency

Response

Key tactical emergency response actions, e.g. activation of fixed

protection if not automatic, deployment, and position of mobile

equipment, target areas for firewater and foam (cooling/

extinguishment/precautionary).

Where possible the number of key actions should be limited to

around five to avoid excessive detail.

Protection of

Adjacent Equipment

Identification of other key equipment and hazard arising.

Cooling requirements developed from radiation studies.

Unit/section/equipment item/scenario.

Required Manpower Level of initial response, e.g. shift first-line response, site brigade,

local authority brigade, mutual aid partners.

Minimum initial response numbers.

Approach direction for various response teams, including entry

point for non-site response, relative to specific and detailed wind/

weather conditions.

Marsh • 4


SECTION DESCRIPTION

Required Equipment Fixed equipment response, show equipment type and capacity, i.e.

deluge (water, foam or chemical), foam to tank seals, monitors should

also include deluge capacity, foam/chemical capacity and type.

Mobile equipment response, show equipment type and capacity, i.e.

deluge (water, foam or chemical), foam to tank seals and monitors, and

hydrants should also include deluge capacity, foam/chemical capacity

and type.

Response required from local authority brigade and mutual aid partners

as appropriate.

Limitations, e.g. quantity of site available fire fighting consumables and

sources of back-up.

Limitations, e.g. volume of surrounding bunds and estimate of when full

if not being drained.

Limitations, e.g. blocked routes due to equipment congestion.

Firewater Runoff Route and destination of runoff.

Location of runoff interceptors and control points (e.g. penstocks).

Diagrams Scenario plot plan showing position of fixed equipment including

activation panels or valve stations and likely position of mobile

equipment, hydrants, monitors, valve stations, water curtain provision,

cooling provision, staging areas taking wind direction into account.

Radiation contour diagram for human and equipment exposure.

BLEVE profile, consequence, and radiation contour diagram.

Dispersion and toxicity diagram.

Maximum Foam and

Water Requirements

For major fire cases only – i.e. those that are likely to test the capacity of

the systems or define stocks to be accessible; and those that are likely to

require special equipment, specific system configurations or supply

arrangements to be set up early in the response plan.

Assess the maximum quantities of foam and firewater required to

control and extinguish the fire. This should be based on likely duration

and intensity, and the attack strategy.

5.5 DRILLSThere should be regular drills by the emergency response

team in conjunction with the operations teams to maintain

their familiarity with the pre-plans and also to test that the

information and response steps within them is valid.

5.6 DISTRIBUTIONThe fire pre-plans should be distributed as follows:

• Master copies of all fire pre-plans to be retained

electronically.

• Controlled copies of all fire pre-plans to be kept in site

emergency manual.

• Controlled copies of area-specific fire pre-plans to be

kept in area emergency procedure manual.

• Controlled (laminated) copies of all fre pre-plans to be

kept on emergency response vehicles.


March 2011

EVENT DATE 08/06/2001

Country United States

Location Louisiana

Unit Type Storage

Event Tank fire

Description Gasoline layer built up on top of 270 ft diameter floating roof tank due to

heavy rain. Fire started by lightning, producing full surface tank fire.

Emergency services set up fire fighting equipment, and once in place, the

fire was extinguished in 65 minutes.

Position paper

comment

This incident is the largest tank fire ever extinguished. It illustrates the

benefits of fire pre-plans.

EVENT DATE 17/03/2008

Country Germany

Location Koln

Unit Type Storage

Event Tank fire

Description An ethylene release from a major pipeline ignited to form a jet fire, which

impinged on an adjacent Acrylonitrile storage tank. A major tank fire

ensued which took 9 hours to extinguish, during which a number of fire

tenders were in attendance with the deployment of 1,180 fire fighters. The

flames had a devastating impact on the tank’s concrete wall, causing cracks

and causing the stability of the whole tank to be in question. Note that the

original jet fire took 5 hours to extinguish. There was no active fire

protection available in the area, and no specific emergency plans for this

scenario. The total cost (property damage, plus business interruption) was

around Euro 53 million.

Position paper

comment

With clear scenario plans in place, the effects of this major fire could have

been greatly reduced.

7. REFERENCE TO INDUSTRY STANDARDSAPI RP 2001 Fire Protection in Refineries.

6. REFERENCE TO INDUSTRY LOSSES

Marsh • 6


8. APPENDICES

APPENDIX AExample of a fire protection pre-plan

THIS DRAWING AND TH

E INFO

RMATION HEREIN CONTA

INED ARE TH

E PROPERTY OF HUNTSMAN

AND/OR SUBSIDIARIES THEREOF WHICH HAS BEEN FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE UPON THE

UNDER

STA

NDING A

ND C

ONDITION THAT ALL P

ERSONS, FIRMS O

R C

ORPORATIONS R

ECEIVING S

UCH

DRAWING A

ND INFO

RMATION S

HALL B

Y THE ACT OF REC

EIVING THEM

BE DEEMED

TO H

AVE AGREED

TO M

AKE NO C

OPY, D

UPLICATION, DISCLOSU

RE OR U

SE W

HATSOEV

ER O

F ALL O

R A

NY

PART TH

EREO

FEX

CEP

T AS E

XPRES

SLY A

UTH

ORIZED

IN W

RITING B

Y H

UNTSMAN N

OT TO

GIVE, LEN

D O

R O

THER

WISE

DISPOSE OF THIS DRAWING, AND TO RETURN THIS DRAWING PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST.

REV

.DWG. NO.

SCALE:

FINAL APPROVA

L:FINAL

APPROVA

LDATE

CH

EC

KE

DAPPROVA

LAPPROVA

LAPPROVA

LAPPROVA

LAPPROVA

LD

RA

WN

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N O

F IS

SU

ER

EV

.

GE

NE

RA

L N

OT

ES

DR

AW

ING

NO

.

RE

FE

RE

NC

E D

RA

WIN

GS

TIT

LE

(P:/B

OR

DE

RS

/HU

NTS

MA

N/H

UN

TSA

0.D

WG

)

REV

.1

23

45

67

89

1011

1213

1415

16

JIHGFEDCBA

PA

RA

XY

LEN

E

AR

EA

2FI

RE

PR

OTE

CTI

ON

PR

E-P

LAN

SH

EE

T 1

OF

2

AN

.T.S

.P

1P

RE

LIM

INA

RY

M.P

.J.

W.

14.0

1.20

02

AA

PP

RO

VE

DM

.P.

J.W

.A

.W.

11.0

2.20

02

A

NO

RTH

TE

ES

WO

RK

S

WATER

STOR

AGE

TANK

F074

2

MOTH

ER LIQUO

RCO

LUMN

REB

OILER

B12

06

DRUM

REFLUX

F129

5

COLUMN

E120

8MO

THER

LIQUO

RC1

282

C

C128

2 A&

B

F129

1

LIQUO

R SU

BRE

CYCL

E

COOLER

C128

4

F074

9L701

CONT

AINS

NO

C4s TH

USOILY W

ATER

SEP

ARAT

OR

DRAIN

CLAS

SIFIED

AS

OPEN

F129

7

XYLENE

TAN

KRE

COVE

RED

F076

4

F072

1 B&

C

F077

0 A&

B

S/STAT

ION

TOWE

RCO

OLING

K705

U703

COO

LING

TOWE

R

PZ6

ROAD

DIR

EC

TIO

N O

F E

VA

CU

ATI

ON

S

EW

N

PR

EV

AIL

ING

WIN

D

RE

STR

ICTO

R P

LATE

RP

NO

N-R

ETU

RN

VA

LVE

SLU

ICE

VA

LVE

C

LOC

KW

ISE

SH

UT

SLU

ICE

VA

LVE

C

LOC

KW

ISE

OP

EN

FIR

E H

YD

RA

NT

FIR

E M

AIN

LO

W

PR

ES

SU

RE

LP

FIR

E M

AIN

FM

DES

CRIPTION

LEGEN

DSY

MBOL

MO

NIT

OR

(350

-750

GP

M)

MO

NIT

OR

/FO

AM

(100

0-20

00 G

PM

)M

ON

ITO

R/F

OA

M(3

50-7

50 G

PM

)

WA

TER

AP

PLI

CA

TIO

NA

PP

LIC

ATI

ON

DE

NS

ITIE

S

2

= .2

0 G

PM

/FT

= .3

0 G

PM

/FT

= .2

5 G

PM

/FT 22

WA

TER

WA

TER

WA

TER

WA

TER

WA

TER

WA

TER

= .3

5 G

PM

/FT

= .6

0 G

PM

/FT

= .5

0 G

PM

/FT

222

PX

4C

ON

TRO

LR

OO

M H14

0H

288

PR

OB

AB

LY S

TILL

EX

ISTS

TH

ER

E IS

NO

PH

YS

ICA

L E

VID

EN

CE

HY

DR

AN

TS P

RE

SE

NT

ON

OR

IGIN

AL

PLA

NT.

WH

ILS

T 6"

FW

MA

IN*

HO

F TH

E F

IRE

HY

DR

AN

TS

ZON

E 1

ZON

E 2

ZON

E 3

SP

EC

IAL

HA

ZAR

D

18

ZON

E 4

ZON

E 5

ZON

E 5

A

ZON

E 6

SP

EC

IAL

HA

ZAR

D

19

ZON

E 7

ZON

E 8

ZON

E 9

ZON

E 1

0

SP

EC

IAL

HA

ZAR

D

20


March 2011

APPENDIX B

WATER

WATER

WATER

WATER

WATER

WATER

22= .50

GPM

/FT

= .60

GPM

/FT2

= .35

GPM

/FT

2= .25

GPM

/FT 2

= .30

GPM

/FT2

= .20

GPM

/FT

APPLICAT

ION

DENS

ITIES

WATER

APPLICAT

ION

ZONE

FLO

W DA

TA

RES

TRIC

TOR

PLA

TE R

P

NO

N-R

ETU

RN

VAL

VE

SLU

ICE

VALV

E C

LOC

KWIS

E SH

UT

SLU

ICE

VALV

E C

LOC

KWIS

E O

PEN

FIR

E H

YDR

ANT

FIR

E M

AIN

LO

W

PRES

SUR

E LP

FIR

E M

AIN

FM

DES

CRIPTION

LEGEN

DSY

MBOL

MO

NIT

OR

(350

-750

GPM

)M

ON

ITO

R/F

OAM

(100

0-20

00 G

PM)

MO

NIT

OR

/FO

AM(3

50-7

50 G

PM)

THIS DRAWING AND TH

E INFO

RMATION HEREIN CONTA

INED ARE TH

E PROPERTY OF HUNTSMAN

AND/OR SUBSIDIARIES THEREOF WHICH HAS BEEN FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE UPON THE

UNDER

STA

NDING A

ND C

ONDITION THAT ALL P

ERSONS, FIRMS O

R C

ORPORATIONS R

ECEIVING S

UCH

DRAWING A

ND INFO

RMATION S

HALL B

Y THE

ACT OF REC

EIVING THEM

BE

DEE

MED

TO H

AVE

AGREE

DTO

MAKE NO C

OPY, D

UPLICATION, DISCLOSU

RE OR U

SE W

HATSOEV

ER O

F ALL O

R A

NY

PART TH

EREO

FEX

CEP

T AS E

XPRES

SLY A

UTH

ORIZED

IN W

RITING B

Y H

UNTSMAN N

OT TO

GIVE, LEN

D O

R O

THER

WISE

DISPOSE OF THIS DRAWING, AND TO RETURN THIS DRAWING PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST.

REV

.DWG. NO.

SCALE:

FINAL APPROVA

L:FINAL

APPROVA

LDATE

CH

ECKE

DAPPROVA

LAPPROVA

LAPPROVA

LAPPROVA

LAPPROVA

LD

RAW

ND

ESC

RIP

TIO

N O

F IS

SUE

REV

.

GE

NE

RA

L N

OT

ES

DR

AW

ING

NO

.

RE

FE

RE

NC

E D

RA

WIN

GS

TIT

LE

(P:/B

OR

DER

S/H

UN

TSM

AN/H

UN

TSA0

.DW

G)

REV

.1

23

45

67

89

1011

1213

1415

16

JIHGFEDCBA

PAR

AXYL

ENE

AREA

2FI

RE

PRO

TEC

TIO

N P

RE-

PLAN

SHEE

T 2

OF

2

AN

.T.S

.P1

PREL

IMIN

ARY

M.P

.J.

W.

14.0

1.20

02

AAP

PRO

VED

M.P

.J.

W.

A.W

.11

.02.

2002

A

ZONE

5

= 1184

GPM

@ 0.35

GPM

/FT

2

ZONE

5A

= 2

57 GP

M @

0.50

GPM

/FT

2

NOTES

ALL D

ENSITIES

REFLECT

U.S. GA

LLON

S

PROD

UCT

FLAS

H PO

INT

°C°F

BPFLAM

MABL

ERA

NGE

VAPO

RDE

NSITY

SPEC

IFIC

GRAV

ITY

SOLU

BILIT

Y

ZONE

4

= 2

17 GP

M @

0.25

GPM

/FT

ZONE

3

= 9

85 GP

M @

0.50

GPM

/FT

ZONE

2

= 4

26 GP

M @

0.50

GPM

/FT

ZONE

1 = 7

03 GP

M @

0.35

GPM

/FT

2 222

BENZ

ENE

-11°C

-52

°F(B

P 80

.1°C

)1.4

- 8

2.7

0.88

MARG

INALLY

TOLUEN

E4.4°

C40

°F(B

P 110.6°

C)1.2

- 7

.13.2

0.87

INSO

LUBL

E

AROM

ASOL H

50°C

122°

F(B

P 170-

200°

C)1 - 8

Approx. 4

0.88

INSO

LUBL

E

2ZO

NE 6

= 2

671 GP

M @

0.60

GPM

/FT

2ZO

NE 7

= 3

49 GP

M @

0.25

GPM

/FT

2ZO

NE 8

= 8

4 GP

M @

0.25

GPM

/FT

PENT

ANE

-50

°C-122°

F(B

P 28

- 3

6°C)

1.4

- 8

2.5

0.6

IMMISC

IBLE

XYLENE

25-31°C

77-88

°F(B

P 137-

143°

C)1 - 9

3.7

0.87

INSO

LUBL

E

ONLY EXP

OSED

ARE

A OF

ADJAC

ENT TA

NKS

SHOU

LD R

ECEIVE

COO

LING

CONS

IDER

ATIONS

NECE

SSAR

Y (AND

STILL A

CHIEVE

REQ

UIRE

D RE

SULTS) TO

MINIMIZE

FLOOD

ING

IN B

UND

AREA

S.BU

T IN A

NY C

ASE, C

ARE SH

OULD B

E TA

KEN

TO A

PPLY M

INIMUM

AMO

UNTS O

F CO

OLING

WATER

COOLING

OF A

DJAC

ENT TA

NKS

SHOU

LD B

E AT

THE

DISCR

ETION

OF THE

INC

IDEN

T CO

MMAN

DER

INITIAL AP

PLICAT

ION

SHOU

LD N

OT B

E AT

TEMP

TED

UNTIL ALL AP

PLICAT

ION

EQUIPM

ENT, M

ANPO

WER

AND

OR IF FLAM

E CO

LLAP

SE A

ND C

ONTR

OL IS

NOT AC

HIEV

ED W

ITHIN

30-45

MINUT

ES O

F INITIAL AP

PLICAT

ION

MAY

ELEC

T TO

INC

REAS

E AP

PLICAT

IONS

RAT

ES IF PR

E BU

RN TIME EX

CEED

S 45

MINUT

ESVA

LUES

REP

RESE

NT M

INIMUM

APP

LICAT

ION

RATE R

EQUIRE

MENT

S, INC

IDEN

T CO

MMAN

DER

MINIMU

M 6" W

ATER

PER

MON

ITOR

/NOZ

ZLE FO

R AP

PLICAT

IONS

150

1 GP

M OR

GRE

ATER

MINIMU

M 4" W

ATER

WAY

FOR

APP

LICAT

ION

1500

GPM

OR

LESS

APPLICAT

ION

IS M

ADE US

ING

LARG

E VO

LUME

EQU

IPME

NT W

HEN

APPLICAB

LE

PRE BU

RN IS

LESS

THA

N 45

MINUT

ES P

RIOR

TO

INITIAL AP

PLICAT

ION

TAN

K FI

RE

FIG

HTI

NG

NO

TES

1 HO

UR FOA

M CO

NCEN

TRAT

E MINIMU

MAP

PLICAT

ION

DEVICE

S

CONS

UMAB

LES

ARE AV

AILABL

E ON

SITE

4.

WATER

CAPA

CITY

3.

MODE

RATE TO

LIGHT

WINDS

TANK

LEV

EL IS

50%

OR G

REAT

ER

APPLICAT

IONS

ARE

BAS

ED O

N

2.1.

ZONE

9

= 8

05 GP

M @

0.35

GPM

/FT

2

ZONE

10

= 5

52 GP

M @

0.50

GPM

/FT

2

NO B

UND

CONT

AINM

ENT

HIGH

PRE

SSUR

E ETHY

LENE

MULTI HY

DROC

ARBO

N FEED

STO

CK LINES

SPEC

IAL HA

ZARD

SSU

BSTA

TION

(ELEC

TRICAL)

HIGH

PRE

SSUR

E HY

DRO-

CARB

ON

ELEV

ATED

PIPES

/EXC

HANG

ERS

LOAD

ING

CONF

IGUR

ATION

(FLANG

ES O

N LOAD

ING

ARM

ARE BO

LTED

TO

FLAN

GES

ON S

HIP)

CHLORINE

(RE

SPIRAT

ORY/

OPTICA

L)HIGH

PRE

SSUR

E CY

LINDE

RS

H.P. H

YDRO

CARB

ON LIQUID

LOAD

ING

HIGH

PRE

SSUR

E STM.

APPA

RATU

S RE

QUIRED

FOR

EME

RGEN

CY R

ESPO

NSE

PERS

ONNE

L DU

RING

MAN

UAL AT

TACK

IN

ALL ZO

NES

UNTIL AU

THOR

IZED

PER

SONN

EL D

ETER

MINE

OTH

ERWISE

.

CONG

ESTION

PROP

YLEN

ECO

VERE

D AR

EA22 232114

ELEV

ATED

ARE

AC9

/C10

CATA

LYST S

TORA

GEBE

NZEN

EFIRE

D HE

ATER

S

17 19 20181615

H.P. FUE

L GA

S

DRUM

STO

RAGE

1312119 10L.P.G.

2

ELEV

ATED

FIN-FA

NS5 7 86431

TOTA

L FO

AM FRO

M TR

AILERS

& TOT

ES =

180

,000

L.

3 ~

DEDICA

TED

TRAC

TOR

(WILT

ON)

FOAM

TRA

ILERS

SECO

NDAR

Y L.P. -

15", 18",

21",

24"

1000

GPM

SKID

MOUN

TED

DIES

EL P

UMP

- (B'HA

M)1000

GPM

SKID

MOUN

TED

DIES

EL P

UMP

- (WILTON

)1000

GPM

SKID

MOUN

TED

DIES

EL P

UMP

- (WILTON

)

3000

GPM

SKID

MOUN

TED

DIES

EL P

UMP

- (NT

W)

PORT

ABLE EME

RGEN

CY R

ESPO

NSE EQ

UIP.

3000

GPM

FOA

M/WA

TER

FIRE

ENG

INE

- (WILTON

)

1000

GPM

SKID

MOUN

TED

DIES

EL P

UMP

- (NT

W)

6000

GPM

FOA

M/WA

TER

FIRE

ENG

INE

- (NT

W)

3000

GPM

SKID

MOUN

TED

DIES

EL P

UMP

- (NT

W)

AVAILABL

E FIXE

D FIRE

WATER

PUMP

S

ADDITION

AL M

ANPO

WER/

EQUIPM

ENT

PRIMAR

Y - 4

", 6", 8", 10"

WILTON

SITE

4 Tees V

alley Wa

ter Pu

mps

*CLEVE

LAND

FIRE

BRIGAD

E WILL

RESP

OND

FROM

MUT

UAL AID.

RESP

IRAT

ORY

HAZA

RDS

POSITIVE

PRE

SSUR

E SE

LF-CO

NTAINE

D BR

EATH

ING

DISTRIBU

TION

SYS

TEM

1 ~

FOAM

TRA

ILER

(NTW

)

4 ~

FOAM

TRA

ILER

(WILT

ON)

1 ~

FOAM

TRA

ILER

(B'HAM

)

AMBU

LANC

E - (NT

W)

STO

RAG

E TA

NKS

84.3

7

TAN

KAP

PLIC

ATIO

N(G

PM)

SUR

FAC

EAR

EAPR

OD

UC

T

C9

- C10

TAN

K N

o.

F-76

4

ZON

E

8

TAN

K D

IA.

2133

7.50

TOTA

L AP

PLIC

ATIO

NTA

NK

& BU

ND

BUN

D

APPL

ICAT

ION

(GPM

)

BUN

D

SUR

FAC

EAR

EA

433.

1213

9534

8.75

Marsh • 8


Marsh’s Risk Engineering Services

team has been established for over 25

years and is uniquely qualified to

provide risk managers and

underwriters with the essential

information they need to determine

the right limit and scope of cover and

the right price.

Each member of the team is a

qualified engineer, with practical

experience in design, construction,

operation, and maintenance across a

broad range of oil, gas, and

petrochemical risks.

They have all been trained in

advanced insurance skills, in the

ability to assess and analyse risk, and

to communicate effectively and

frequently in more than one

language.

The goal is to build bridges between

risk engineering, insurance and risk

management, and between the client

and the underwriter. At the same

time, the comparative skills of the

team permit a benchmarking system

which gives a global opinion of the

risk, assessed against peer plants

world-wide.

From the earliest planning stage to

the last operational phase, the

engineering services team is able to

contribute practical and

cost-effective advice, and assistance.

In addition to tailored programmes,

the team has a series of core

packages, covering everything from

managing a major emergency to risk

reduction design features, and safe

working practices.

The Engineering Services team uses

its breadth of expertise, experience,

and its practical knowledge and skills

to communicate a real understanding

of physical risks, your insurance

implications and the commercial

operating environment.

THE ENGINEERING SERVICES TEAM

For further information, please

contact your local Marsh office or visit

our web site at: marsh.com

Marsh is one of the Marsh & McLennan Companies, together with Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman.

The information contained herein is based on sources we believe reliable and should be understood to be general risk management and insurance information only. The information is not intended to be taken as advice with respect to any individual situation and cannot be relied upon as such.

In the United Kingdom, Marsh Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

Copyright © 2015 Marsh Ltd All rights reserved.

BEIJINGTel: +86 10 6533 4070 Fax: +86 10 8529 8761

CALGARYTel: +1 403 290 7900 Fax: +1 403 261 9882

CAPE TOWNTel: +27 21 403 1940Fax: +27 21 419 3867

DUBAITel: +971 4 223 7700 Fax: +971 4 227 2020

HOUSTONTel: +1 713 276 8000 Fax: +1 713 276 8888

LONDONTel: +44 (0)20 7357 1000 Fax: +44 (0)20 7929 2705

MADRIDTel: +34 914 569 400 Fax: +34 913 025 500

MOSCOWTel: +7 495 787 7070 Fax: +7 495 787 7071

MUMBAITel: +91 226 651 2900Fax: +91 225 651 2901

NEW YORKTel: +1 212 345 6000 Fax: +1 212 345 4853

OSLOTel: +47 22 01 10 00 Fax: +47 22 01 10 90

PERTHTel: +61 8 9289 3888 Fax: +61 8 9289 3880

RIO DE JANEIROTel: +55 21 2141 1650 Fax: +55 21 2141 1604

SAN FRANCISCOTel: +1 415 743 8000 Fax: +1 415 743 8080

SINGAPORETel: +65 6327 3150 Fax: +65 6327 8845

http://www.marsh.com

fire pre-plans - marsh

Documents