enterprise architecture enterprise architecture and and business architecture business architecture
TRANSCRIPT
1
Enterprise Architecture Enterprise Architecture and and
Business ArchitectureBusiness Architecture
Dr. Ir. J.A.P. Hoogervorst
27 mei 2009
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
2
Contents (1)Contents (1)
1. IntroductionIntroducing our core concepts
2. Enterprise essentialsSome core concepts
3. Conditions for successfully implementing strategic choicesThe case for design focus
4. System thinking and the importance of architecturePrelude to the enterprise as a system
5. Architecture, architecturing and designingThe complementary nature of architecturing and designing
6. Enterprise architecture and business architectureBusiness architecture as the functional architecture of the enterprise
7. Closing Thoughts
2
A Central Problem of Modern A Central Problem of Modern ScienceScience
Introducing our core concepts
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
4
A world of ProblemsA world of Problems
Problems of unorganized complexityVery large number of interdependencies
Problems of organized complexityMany interdependencies
Problems of organized simplicityFew interdependencies
3
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
5
Organized ComplexityOrganized Complexity
EnterpriseGovernance
&Enterprise
Engineering
Order Design
Enterprises as organizedcomplexities
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
6
Two Main ThemesTwo Main Themes
Enterprise Governance: the organizational competencefor continuously exercising guiding
authority over enterprise strategy and architecture development, and the subsequent design,
implementation and operation of the enterprise
Enterprise engineering: a discipline – domain of knowledge, concepts, theory and associated
methodology – for analyzing, designing, and creating enterprises
4
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
7
TheThe Notion of DesignNotion of Design
Enterprise design:“courses of action aimed at changing existing [enterprise] conditions into preferred ones1
1. H. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial(1969)
Chaotic developments:• Incidental• Subject to change• Unpredictable
Intentional developments:• Goal oriented• Purposeful• Overall order
DesignGovernance
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
8
Enterprise EngineeringEnterprise Engineering
Form
Content
Intention
Data Systems Engineering
Information Systems Engineering
Enterprise Engineering
Organizational Sciences
Data
Information,Communication
Collaboration,Cooperation
Enterprise Ontology Enterprise Architecture
5
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
9
The Organized Complexity Problem The Organized Complexity Problem
“A basic problem posed to modern science is a general
theory of organization” (p. 34)
“The only meaningful way to study organization, is to study it as a system” (p. 9)
(1969)
Or in our terminology: the only meaningful way to
analyze, design, and deploy an enterprise is to that from
a system perspective.
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
10
Broad AttentionBroad Attention
6
Enterprise EssentialsEnterprise Essentials
Some core concepts
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
12
What is an Enterprise?What is an Enterprise?
• “A consciously coordinated social entity with a relatively identifiable boundary, that functions on a relatively continuous basis to achieve a common goal or a set of goals”1
• Organizations are social units (or human groupings) deliberately constructed and reconstructed to seek specific goals”2
1. Social entities
2. Goal directed
3. Designedas deliberatelystructured and coordinated activity systems
4. Linked to the external environment
Enterprises are3:
1. Robbins, S.P., Organizational Theory(1990)2. Etzioni, A., In: Lammers, C.J., Organisaties vergelijkenderwijs(1987)3. Daft, R.L., Organization Theory and Design(2001)
7
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
13
Fundamental Issue (1)Fundamental Issue (1)
• Functionalization1: arranging specific tasks or task structures
• Coordination1: realizing coherence in task execution
• Rational finalization1: ensuring that the totality of interaction patterns is directed towards the ultimate enterprise goal(s)
Differentiation2
Integration2
The fundamental issue:Functionalization, differentiation Unity, coherence, integration
1. Lammers, C.J., Organisaties vergelijkenderwijs(1987)2. Lawrence, P., Lorsch, J., Organization and Environment (1967)
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
14
Fundamental Issue (2)Fundamental Issue (2)
Formalization
• Quality of service• Reliability• Availability
Innovation
• Renewal• Adaptation
• Machine-like• Predictable
• Chaotic• Nomadic• Unpredictable
Opposing
Characteristics
• Becoming• Change
• Being• Conservation
8
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
15
Organizational ChallengeOrganizational Challenge
The ability to create conditions for delivering (predictable) quality of service, as well as create conditions that enable (unpredictable) patterns of
renewal, innovation and adaptation to emerge
“Having the capacity to changebefore the case for change becomes desperately obvious”1
1. Hamel, G., Välikangas, L. (2003). The Quest for Resilience.
The capacity for change must be designed-in
Conditions for Successfully Conditions for Successfully Implementing Strategic ChoicesImplementing Strategic Choices
The case for the design focus
9
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
17
Strategic SuccessesStrategic Successes
“Various studies indicate that 70 percent to 90
percent of organizations failed to realize success from their strategies”1
1. Harvard Business School Press 2004
What is the percentage of success?
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
18
Many Failures...Many Failures...
Total Quality Management
Six Sigma
Business Process ManagementBusiness Process Reengineering
Learning Organization
Customer Relationship Management
Supply Chain Management
Enterprise Resource Planning
Activity Based Costing
Mergers and Acquisitions
10
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
19
Technology ImplementationsTechnology Implementations• The majority (50%-70%) of
technology implementations fail1
• 75% of all attempts to introduce automation to the workplace have failed1
• Technology introduction requires (major) changes outside the technology domain, which the technology introduction does not “automatically” bring about2
• Looking at technology alone is insufficientfor making technology “work” 2
1. Rechtin, E. (2000). Systems Architecting of Organizations.2. Scott Morton, M.S. (1991). The Corporation of the 1990s.
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
20
IT ResultsIT Results
Reference level
0Relative IT investment level
Relative enterprise performance
• There is no correlation between investment in IT and profitability, or other key measures of business success1
• According to the Standish Group: more than 50% of IT projects did not meet requirements, and around 25% are cancelled1
1. Pisello, T., Strassmann, P. (2003). IT Value Chain Management - Maximizing the ROI from IT Investments.
2. Strassmann, P., (1990). The business value of computers.
11
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
21
About Strategy and ImplementationAbout Strategy and Implementation
High
Low
Low High
Strategic capabilities
Deployment capabilities
‘waste’
‘lost case’ ‘ineffective’
‘competent’Coherent and consistent• Strategic initiatives• Deployment of initiatives
Design and implementation
Governance competence
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
22
Unity and integrationUnity and integration
Many failed change programs prove the importance of consistency and coherence
1. R. Fritz, Corporate Tides(1996)2. A. Pettigrew, In: R. Galliers, W. Baets, Information Technology and Organizational Transformation (1998)3. P. Lawrence, J. Lorsch, Organization and Environment(1967)4. T. Powel, Organizational Alignment as Competitive Advantage(1992)5. D. Nadler, M. Tuschman, Competing by Design (1997)6. J. Hoogervorst, Quality and Customer Oriented Behavior: Towards a Coherent Approach for Improvement (1998)
Ability to change
Unity and integration
Enterprise performance
• Structural conflict1
• Segmentation and incoherence2
• Internal structural fit3
• Organizational alignment4
• Congruence5
• Coherence6
Labels:
12
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
23
Unity and integration…Unity and integration…
Governance and design
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
24
A Framework for IntegrationA Framework for Integration
Strategy Systems
Skills Style
Structure
Staff
Sharedvalues
• Unclear whether attention areas are comprehensive (necessary and sufficient
• Unclear how coherence and consistency between the attention areas is achieved
• Underlying theory and methodology behind the framework remains vague
McKinsey 7S Framework, In: Perters, T.J., Wateman, R.H., In Search of Excellence(1982)
13
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
25
Our Premise (1)Our Premise (1)
A condition for the successful realization of (strategic) enterprise objectives is that the
enterprise has been (re)designedin an integrated, coherentand consistentmanner.
This condition does not imply that integration, coherence and consistency necessarily leads to success (although this condition appears to be more
important than the quality of the strategy itself1), but that success indicates that integration, coherence and consistency have been established, and that
absence of these conditions imply failure
1. Collis and Montgomery, In: Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization.
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
26
Our Premise (2)Our Premise (2)
Increasing the success rate of strategic (IT) initiatives will generally not result from
structural governance measures (e.g. more stringent financial decision making)
The key to increased success of implementing strategic choices lies
in the area of Enterprise Design
14
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
27
Integrated Design RequiredIntegrated Design Required
• Business design• Organizational design• Informational design• Technology design
A design methodology is required that aids in integrated, mutually consistent
Business, Organizational, Informational and Technology design
System Thinking and the Importance System Thinking and the Importance of Architectureof Architecture
Prelude to the viewing enterprise as a system
15
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
29
What is a System?What is a System?
A set of different elements so connected or related as to perform a unique function not performable by the
elements alone1
1. Maier, M.W., Rechtin, E. (2002). The Art of Systems Architecting.
A set of elements standing in interrelation among themselves and with the
environment2
2. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1969). General System Theory.
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
30
Functional and Constructional Functional and Constructional PerspectivePerspective
Functional, teleologicalperspective:• Closed, “black-box” view1
• Management, control oriented• Design knowledge not required
Constructional, ontologicalperspective:• Open, “white-box view1
• Design, change oriented• Design knowledge essential
1. Dietz, J.L.G., Enterprise Ontology (2006)
16
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
31
Key System Thinking AspectsKey System Thinking Aspects
• Holistic, not reductionistic• Focus on relationships between the system
elements• Teleological (purpose) and ontological
(essence) perspectives, translated into the functionaland constructionalperspectives
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
32
The System as an ArtifactThe System as an Artifact
• A system is a purposeful, intentionalarrangement of elements
• The process of system creation is thus inherently not accidental
• The inevitable question is thus how the system is to be realized
• The nature of this question implies normativeguidance
Normative guidance is in our view the essence of architecture
Logical consequences:
17
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
33
Views on ArchitectureViews on Architecture
• A top-down descriptionof the structure of the system, its components and their interrelationships
• A family of guidelines(rules, concepts, principles, patterns, standards) for design
• A formal descriptionof a system that supports reasoning about the structural properties of the system
• A system’s reference model• The fundamental organization of a systemembodied by its
components, their relationships to each other and the environment, and the principles guiding its designand evolution (IEEE 1471)
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
34
Architecture: Two ViewsArchitecture: Two Views
• Descriptiveview: architecture describes how a design actually is in terms of its functional, operational or material manifestation (consequence)
• Prescriptiveview: architecture guides how a design must beaccomplished: normative limitation of design freedom (antecedent)
The descriptive view is cogently rejected
18
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
35
Our View on ArchitectureOur View on Architecture
• Conceptually, the essence of architecture is to provide normativeguidance for design
• Architecture is therefore essentially a prescriptiveconcept that pronounces how things must become, rather than a descriptiveconcept that reveals how things are
We will use the prescriptive view and consider architecture practically as a consistent and coherent set of principles and
standards that guide how a system is to be designed.1. Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Enterprise Governance & Enterprise Engineering (2009)2. Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Dietz, J.L.G., Kernbegrippen omtrent enterprise architectuur en architectureren(Tiem 2005)
Architecture, Architecturing and Architecture, Architecturing and DesigningDesigning
The complementary nature of architecturing and designing
19
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
37
Architecturing and DesigningArchitecturing and Designing
Architecture
Design
Architecturing
Designing
Implementing
System
System Engineering
• Functional model• Constructional models
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
38
Two Complementary ProcessesTwo Complementary Processes
Architecture
Systems
Architecturing
Specific systemSystem class
Design
20
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
39
References for ArchitecturingReferences for Architecturing
System: car
• Personalized transport• Status
• Reliability• Safety• Economy• Maintainability
Construction:• Motor• Chassis/Casco• Interior• Brakes• Wheels• Lamps
operationalize
addressed in
Architecture
System goals
Areas of concern Design domains
indicate addressed in
need needaddresses applies to
oper.support
Function:• Lighting• Warning• Heating• Steering
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
40
Architecture ExamplesArchitecture Examples
Architecture:• Two separate brake systems must be used• Both brake systems must operate on rear wheels
indicate addressed in
operationalize
addressed in
need needaddresses applies to
oper.support
Area of concern:• Safety
Design domains:• Wheels• Brakes
Car system goals:• Personalized transport• Status
21
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
41
Architecture ExamplesArchitecture Examples
Area of concern Design domain Architecture
Safety
Function (warning) Warning signals must be presented visually and audibly
Function (lighting) Headlights must extinguish after engine switch-off
Construction (brakes) Dual brake systems must operate on the rear brakes
Construction (casco/doors) Closing signals must only be triggered by all locks closed condition
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
42
ArchitecturingArchitecturing
• Normative (principle-based)
• Formal (method-based)
• Participative (stakeholder-based)
• Heuristic (experience, insight-based)1
1. Maier, M.W., Rechtin, E. (2002). The Art of Systems Architecting.
Architecturing can be defined as the process for defining architecture
22
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
43
Architecture FrameworkArchitecture Framework
In short notation1:
1. Dietz, J.L.G et al., Extensible Architecture Framework (2004).2. Hoogervorst. J.A.P., Enterprise Governance & Enterprise Engineering (2009)
<S,D,A>• Areas of concern• Design domains• System type
An architecture framework is a conceptual structure pertinent to a system type, consisting of areas of concern and
a necessary and sufficient partition of the system type in design domains related to a chosen perception
Enterprise Architecture and Enterprise Architecture and Enterprise Design DomainsEnterprise Design Domains
The system view on enterprises
23
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
45
What is Enterprise Architecture?What is Enterprise Architecture?
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
46
EA: A Popular ThemeEA: A Popular Theme
24
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
47
CautionCautionEnterprise Architecture is still
relatively immature from both a research and practice perspective,
and there is not a widespread consensus on the terminology. The terms “Enterprise Architect” and
“Enterprise Architecture” are interpreted and defined in many
different ways and there is no single universally accepted definition yet1
1. Global Enterprise Architecture Organization (www.geao.org), accessed December 12, 2005
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
48
Architecture: Broad AttentionArchitecture: Broad Attention
25
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
49
The Enterprise Basic PerspectivesThe Enterprise Basic Perspectives
Teleological perspective:• Purpose(s)• Function(s)• Black-box
Ontological perspective:• Design• Construction• White-box
Management
Architect/Engineer
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
50
Bridging the GapBridging the Gap
• Management• Performance
• Design• ChangeIncommensurable
domains
Black-boxFunctionalPerspective
White-boxConstructional
Perspective
EnterpriseArchitecture
Can bereasoned from
Requirement:Handling of multiple product labels through various interaction channels
Architecture:•Products and services must be suitable for selling under multiple labels
•Presentation logic may not contain label-specific functionality
•Portlets must be multi-channel compatible
26
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
51
Architecture: Two AspectsArchitecture: Two Aspects
The environment:
•Passengers
•Airports
•Service personnel;
•Flight crew
•Air traffic control
Function architecture:
•Critical system switches must have different shape
•Flight warning signals must be both visual and audible
•Flight information must be presented according to the ‘basic T’ standard
Construction architecture:
•Four separate flight guidance systems must be used
•Wiring of the different flight guidance systems must use different cable conduits
•Flaps must be made of composite material
•AC voltage is 115V/400Hz
•Baggage storage space must be based on standard LD4 containers
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
52
Enterprise ArchitectureEnterprise Architecture
The environment:
•Customers
•Business partners
•Suppliers
•Competitors
•Market
Function architecture:
•Separate payment and service points
•Electronic payment through cards and mobile phone
•Sales outlets only through franchising
•Per basic product a maximum of three product variations may be offered
Construction architecture:
•Process control must be separated from process execution
•Quality control must take place at the point of production
•Product and sales information must be available at all outlets
•Network access must be based on authentication and role-based authorization
Function: the businessConstruction: the operation
27
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
53
Key Enterprise Design DomainsKey Enterprise Design Domains
• Business: regards the primary purposeful and gainful enterprise activities (e.g. the delivering of products or services)
• Organization: regards the manner by which the purposeful and gainful enterprise activities are actually arranged
• Information: regards the intelligence (cognitive aspects) pertinent to business and organizational activities
• Technology: the specific use of knowledge, methods, and human and physical resources through which the enterprise is implemented.
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
54
Enterprise Design DomainsEnterprise Design Domains
Complex, adaptive “socio-technical” system of human endeavor
Context Context
Information
Business
Organization Technology
Construction: how
Function: what
28
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
55
Enterprise ArchitectureEnterprise ArchitectureFunction: the businessConstruction: operation
Business architecture is the function
architecture of an enterprise: a
coherent and consistent set of
principles and standards that guide
the manner of interaction between
the enterprise and its environment
Somewhat limited focus:
Business architecture is a coherent
and consistent set of principles and
standards that guide the way
products and services are offered and
delivered to customers
•Organization architecture
•Information architecture
•IT architecture
form the construction architecture of an
enterprise: a coherent and consistent set of
principles and standards the guide the
arrangement (its ‘being’) of the enterprise
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
56
Enterprise Architecture DefinitionEnterprise Architecture Definition
Enterprise architecture is a coherent and consistent set of principles and standards that
guide the design of the enterprise as a whole
Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Enterprise Architecture: Enabling Integration, Agility and Change(IJCIS 2004)Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Enterprise Engineering en –Architectuur: een antwoord op falende strategie-implementaties(HMR 2004)Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Dietz, J.L.G., Kernbegrippen omtrent enterprise architectuur en architectureren(Tiem 2005)Hoogervorst, J.A.P., Enterprise Governance & Enterprise Engineering(Springer 2009)
29
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
57
ArchitecturingArchitecturing
addressed in
• Flexibility• Time to market• Quality• Customer satisfaction• Employee satisfaction• Employee involvement• Safety• Costs• Compliance• Business ethics
• Strategic position• Strategic perspective
operationalize
• Enterprise mission• Strategy
• Business• Organization• Information• Technology
Architecture
System goals
Areas of concern Design domains
indicateindicate,
addressed in
need needaddresses applies to
operat.support
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
58
Architecture ExamplesArchitecture ExamplesArea of concern Main design domain Architecture
Customer satisfaction
Business Products and services must be customizable
Organization Management must enable employee self-management
InformationComplete and up-to-date customer information must be available at all customer contact points
Organization Decision making must take place at the lowest possible level
Technology Technology must enhance customer productivity and comfort
Security
Information Supplier information must be available from one unified source
Technology (IT)Network access must be based on authentication and role-based authorization
Safety BusinessThe delivery of products and services must never compromise safety
Employee satisfaction Organization People employment must focus on employee self-efficacy
Flexibility OrganizationProcess flow control must be separated from execution logic
Decision making must take place at the lowest possible level
Compliance OrganizationProcurement and payment processes must have ‘non repudiation’ protection
Business ethics BusinessDevelopment and delivery of products and services must have minimally possible milieu impact
30
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
59
Enterprise Architecture: Four Enterprise Architecture: Four Main Design DomainsMain Design Domains
Organizational Architecture
Importance of consistency withinand betweenarchitecture domains
Business Architecture
Technology Architecture
Information Architecture
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
60
Information
Business
Organization Technology
Function: what
Construction: how• Process control must be separated from process execution
• Customer purchase/selection actions must always be confirmed
• Redundant data entry about the same aspect is not allowed
• Processes must have non-repudiation protection• Assessment and reward systems must evoke and support
customers and service oriented behavior and adherence to espoused norms and values
• Presentation and content of data must be separated• Access to systems and data must be based on authentication
and role-based authorization• Applications may not contain brand-specific logic• Applications must enable multi-channel access• TCP/IP must be the standard transport protocol
Unity and IntegrationUnity and Integration• Data may have only one authoritative source• Data about customer claim behavior must be actively
captured• Data from operational systems must update
informational systems real-time• Data content and presentation must be separated• Presentation logic may not contain brand-specific
functionality• Customer data must enable risk profiling• Semantics must be consistent enterprise-wide
• Products must enable delivery under different brands• Only low-risk products may be offered• Insurance transactions must be completely executed through
the Internet• Product customization may only be based on standard
modules• Customer purchase/selection actions must always be
confirmed• Products may only have one customer contact point• Customers must be informed about the status of their
request/order
31
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
61
The Role of ArchitectureThe Role of Architecture
Architecture Object (System)
Design domains
Architecture(Principles and
standards)
<S,D,A> Architecture framework
• Flexibility• Compliance• Customer satisfaction…• Employee satisfaction• Costs
Address
Applies to
Key actions
Defines the enterprise strategy in an emerging manner
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
62
Publication of Business Architecture PrinciplesPublication of Business Architecture PrinciplesPrinciple statementInsurance transactions must be completely executed through the Internet.
RationaleThe electronic (digital) form of transactions allows easy integration of these processes with other enterprise processes (e.g. financial and accounting process). Process quality is increased, and the complexity of processes – hence costs – is reduced due to the significant reduction of manual interventions. Customer satisfaction will most likely increase. Further, the process are faster in execution, while they can be more easily adapted to business growth. The electronic nature of the processes enable greater security and adherence to rules and regulations.
ImplicationsCurrent non-electronic forms of invoicing and payment must be reduced gradually. This has consequences for some customers and the internal administrative staff. Specific implications are faced by customers without acceptable electronic means.
Key actionsInvestigate solutions for electronic transaction services.Consider the consequences for the current administrative staff.Investigate possible solutions (or exceptions) for those customers not having (or unlikely to have) adequate means to handle insurance transactions electronically. Define under which conditions exceptions to the principle must be grantedDefine the requirements for electronic transaction servicesDevelop electronic transaction services as part of the Enterprise Commodity Infrastructure and Services (cf. paragraph 7.4.3).
32
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
63
Publication of Organization Architecture Publication of Organization Architecture PrinciplesPrinciples
Principle statementAssessment and reward systems must evoke and support desired customer and service oriented behavior and adherence to espoused norms and values.
RationaleAs a strategic focus, our organization places high value on customers and the service to them, and treasures the norms and values by which we conduct our business. Hence, we must ensure that our assessment and monetary reward systems induce coherent behavior that is consistent with these views.
ImplicationsCurrent departmentally focused assessment and reward systems will be discontinued.Behavior not consistent with customer and quality oriented focus will be actively discouraged.
Key actionInvestigate en reengineer pertinent assessment and reward systems.Define necessary employee and management training.Define the necessary information supply and associated systems for supporting desired employee behavior.
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
64
Publication Information Architecture PrinciplesPublication Information Architecture Principles
Principle statementData from operational systems must update informational systems real-time.
RationaleInformation is a key enterprise ‘recourse’. Timely availability is key in order to control enterprise processes adequately and respond to otherwise unnoticed trends and developments. These might for example concern quality degradations, or (undesired) consumer behavior. Improved process performance, business intelligence, as well as security and compliance are the result of timely availability of information. Moreover, the ‘real-time‘ enterprise offers opportunities to enhance the customer and service orientation, since customer data is always current and can be used productively and proactively in all subsequent customer interactions.
ImplicationsData must be considered as a corporate asset. No restrictions on their utilization outside the domain where the data are generated should exist. Operational processes should not limit the extraction of informational data.
Key actionsStudy how different types of operational data must be extracted, transformed, and loaded (ETL) into unified informational databases.Define ETL, back-up, (re)store, replication, synchronization, archiving, and reporting services in the context of data warehousing.
33
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
65
Publication IT Architecture PrinciplesPublication IT Architecture Principles
Principle statementAccess to systems and data must be based on authentication and role-based authorization.
RationaleFlexibility and speed, as well as customer and service orientation are crucial enterprise areas of concern. For that, easy and quick access to our services - any place and any time- is essential for customers, business partners, employees, and suppliers. At the same time, such access should be secure in order to avoid security risks.
ImplicationsCurrent access methods must be discontinued.Different user groups must comply with more stringent access arrangements.
Key actionsEstablish the essential enterprise roles.Investigate possible methods for authentication and areas (user groups) of utilization.Study migration of current instances not compliant with this principle to the compliant access method.Develop identity management and access services.Create overall security policies and awareness for the different user groups
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
66
Conceptual OverviewConceptual Overview
Strategic choices
Areas of concern
Functional requirementsConstructional requirements
Unity and integration
Lead to
Addresses
Ensures
GuidesDesign process
EnterpriseArchitecture
Functional designConstructional design
Business rules
Creates
Develops
Enterprise functionand construction
Enterpriseoperation
Endorse
EndorseAddresses
Materializes
Indicate
Fundamental convictions
34
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
67
Design: Two aspectsDesign: Two aspects
Architecture guides the internal arrangements (the construction)
Business rules guide the way of working (operation)
Hoogervorst Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering
68
Closing ThoughtClosing Thought