country report of the asean assessment on the social impact of the global financial crisis: thailand
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
1/24
COUNTRY REPORT OF
THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON
THE SOCIAL IMPACT OFTHE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS:
THAILAND
with the support o:
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
2/24
i
This volume is a product resulting rom a project jointly implemented by the sta o the International Bank or Reconstruction and Development/
the World Bank and the ASEAN Secretariat, with nancial support o the Australian Government. The ndings, interpretations, and conclusions
expressed in this paper do not necessarily refect the views o the Executive Directors o the World Bank, the governments they represent, the ASEAN
Secretariat, the Australian Government and/or ASEAN Member States. The World Bank, the ASEAN Secretariat and the Australian Government do
not guarantee the accuracy o the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other inormation shown on any map in
this work do not imply any judgment on the part o the World Bank concerning the legal status o any territory or the endorsement or acceptance
o such boundaries.
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
3/24
1
I. ThaIlands EconomIc slowdown
atg Ti e reie reiiet i te e te prie rii er i 2008, it it
prtir r b te i ei rii i te rt qrter 2008, re GdP i prjete t
trt b 2.9 peret i 2009 e. In recent years, Thailands pace o expansion has been slowed down
by high energy prices and waning consumer and investor condence. As a result, real GDP growth declined rom
6.2 percent per year during between 2002 and 2004 to 4.6 percent per year between 2005 and 2007 (World Bank,
2007). This was below the 5.5 percent growth o Southeast Asia as a whole during the same time period and
contrasted with the impressive perormance o other countries in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS). Thailands
extraordinarily strong growth in the rst three quarters o 2008,1 attributable to robust exports and investment, took
a severe hit in the ourth quarter with the sharp decline in global demand and the domestic political crisis, which
negatively aected tourism and consumer condence. Figure 1 and 2 both show a sharp drop in exports in the
third quarter o 2008 and the ollowing drop in GDP growth. For 2009, real GDP is projected to contract by about
2.9 percent The World Bank expects the governments scal stimulus package to lessen the negative impact othe global economic crisis, but the contraction may become more severe. Export volumes are expected to have
contracted by 16 percent in 2009, and the reduction in the arrivals o tourists rom developed countries will put a
heavy strain on the export o services, which are projected to decline by 6.6 percent this year.
Tere bee eere eie i prti i te Ti e ie te begiig 2009, r re
expetig te rii t perit r e tie t e. As can be seen in Figure 1, the decline in economic activity
has been experienced by a wide range o rms in all sectors. This has been conrmed in ocus group discussions
(FGD) held with executives and business leaders in several regions throughout Thailand (World Bank, 2009a).
Automobile manuacturers, real estate, and IT and electronic businesses have seen a slump in domestic and
international demand. Representatives o IT businesses mentioned that to cut costs they will soon have to lay o
workers and reduce working hours. Some also reported that they are sending some o their workers on additional
holidays, and that they will cut overtime. Compared with the nancial crisis a decade ago, rms stated that they
were provided with much more inormation and are now in a much better position to adapt their businesses to the
crisis. They all expect the crisis to last or the next two to three years.
1 In the frst three quarters o 2008, output grew by 5.1 percent year-on-year.
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
4/24
2
Te i rii e ipt epet erepet trtig i deeber 2008,
tg er epet i ti er . As the economic crisis began, unemployment rates in Thailand
increased (Figure 5). In December 2008, the number o unemployed individuals rose by 65 percent year-on-year,
resulting in an unemployment rate o 1.4 percent in December and 2.4 percent in January. A survey conducted
by the Ministry o Education showed that the crisis also hit new graduates rom public and private universities.
The share o unemployed new graduates almost doubled rom 17.7 percent in 2007 to 30 percent in 2008, which is
evidence that labor supply and demand are moving urther apart. However, the unemployment rate only tells one
part o the story. The number o underemployed workers2
in act increased by roughly 3 percent (180,000) betweenSeptember 2008 and March 2009 (World Bank, 2009a).
Ti experiee it i te itribti epet, it rer ig t trig
it i pbi erie e tre, bt erge ge rei rg ge. Looking at the
sectoral distribution o employment (Figures 3 and 4), it can be seen that employment in manuacturing declined
by more than 200,000 in both the rst and second quarters o 2009. This is hardly surprising given the sharp decline
in exports (Figure 2Figure 2), which was largely experienced by manuacturing industries. On the other hand, both
the public sector and sales and trade attracted a increasing share o employment. The scal stimulus package
succeeded in creating new employment as government spending on health care and education increased. In all
probability, the increase in sales and trade is due to growth in the retail sector, with most o the new employment
being in the inormal sector in supermarkets and general retail shops. Most o these jobs are likely to be part-time
with no ormal saety net or security attached. However, it is not possible to conrm this because o a lack o
detailed sectoral employment data. Data on nominal wages (Figure 6) suggest that adjustment in labor markets
only happened via employment with average sectoral wages staying roughly constant over time. However, ocus
2 In Thailand, workers are underemployed i they work less than 30 hours and are available or more work.
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
5/24
3
group discussions held with Thai workers in all sectors in April 20093 indicated that ew workers have experienced
wage cuts or reduced working hours. Some ormal workers did not nd it suciently protable to remain employed
with their company and let voluntarily. Others preerred to remain employed despite having their salaries reduced
because they eared not nding a job in the near uture.
l-ie rer i te er rge ir etr re beig prtir ete b te rii bee
teir ig expre t i ri. Inormal sector workers generally have experienced reduced earnings and
cope through increased borrowing or reduced consumption. Participants in ocus group discussions held with
inormal sector workers in an area close to the port o Bangkok reported that the amount o available work has
3 World Bank (2009a)
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
6/24
4
decreased over the past ew months or workers in dierent elds. All participants mentioned that daily rates have
been cut, with those o skilled construction workers and porters being down by roughly 60 percent. Piece rates or
sewing workers who sell their products (such as trousers and shirts) to rms went down rom 12 Baht to 9 Baht.
Some sewing workers even reported that there is no guarantee that they will be paid and that they have to bear
the cost o their material and inputs. Inormal workers compensate or their loss in earnings by borrowing money
rom banks, credit unions, and credit sharks who charge up to 20 percent interest per month. Some have reduced
their daily consumption and cut their ood expenditure by reducing their number o meals per day rom three to two.
Participants usually had no access to ormal saety nets such as the Social Security Fund (SSF) because they could
not aord the monthly premium o 280 Baht.
a reti i te ber trit iitig Ti et tt te p i Bg i
30 peret, rge ber rer i te tri etr re expete t e teir jb i 2009. Tourism
was not only hit by the nancial crisis but also by growing social and political unrest as well as the emergence oH1N1. Tourism ocials orecast that Thailand would host 2 million ewer tourists in 2009 than in the previous year,
resulting in a loss on the order o US$2.5 billion (4Hoteliers, 2009). Because the Thai economy relies to a large extent
on tourism receipts, the decline is expected to have a severe impact on the labor market. The Association o Thai
travel agents expects the number o layos in the industry in the second hal o 2009 to be roughly 50,000. To help
struggling small and medium-sized tourism companies, the government has approved the Financial Assistance
Programme or Tourist Operators in which banks provide small and medium-sized tourism companies with cheap
loans or the grace period o one year.
Ti i e Et ai jr br-reeiig trie, igrt rer re beig ei
ete b te rii. The International Labor Organization (ILO) estimates that there are currently some 1.8 million
migrant workers in Thailand rom neighboring countries such as Laos, Cambodia, and Myanmar (ILO, 2009). Most
are working in the inormal sector, including agriculture and shing, ood processing, the construction industry,
and various low-skilled services. Again, ocus group discussions held with migrant workers in Thailand revealed
reduced working hours and earnings over the past ew months. Starting in January 2009, some migrant workers
have returned back home but hope to come back to Thailand once the economic situation has improved. Those
workers who have no valid work permit and no registration are particularly badly o, as they are not able to
change their jobs because employers now only accept workers who hold a work permit. The Thai government also
took measures to reduce the share o migrant workers in the labor orce by reusing to issue more work permits
in 2009. Some 500,000 work permits will not be renewed in 2010, and the authorities have threatened to deport
undocumented migrant workers. This could make the situation untenable or migrant workers, causing them to
return to their home countries.
mitrig
I Ti, tere i rtge t tt be e t itr te eet te gb i rii
br re t re ete reqet pree i tie i. Data are collected on social
indicators but in a less consistent manner. The ocial Labor Force Survey (LFS) in Thailand is very well developed. It
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
7/24
5
is conducted throughout the year, and representative quarterly and monthly aggregated results are made available
with a lag o only two to three months. In contrast, the National Statistics Oce (NSO) conducts a Health and
Welare Survey (HWS) only once a year4 with the latest available results being rom 2007. In addition, administrative
data are collected but are only made available with a considerable time lag. The National Health Security Oce
(NHSO), a part o the Ministry o Public Health (MOPH), would like to be able to monitor and mitigate the impact
o the nancial crisis in two ways. First, it is expected that, with rising unemployment and workers shiting rom
ormal to inormal employment, members o the Social Security Fund (SSF) will shit to universal coverage, which
provides basic health benets or ree. The NHSO wants to use existing data rom the Social Security Oce (SSO)
to track this move between systems. Second, the NHSO is also expecting that laid-o workers are eeling a high
degree o psychological strain. Thereore, the MOPH would like to monitor the industries that are aected by
the economic crisis. To this end, the MOPH intends to work closely together with the Ministry o Labor to get an
indication o the regional as well as the sectoral impact o the crisis in terms o layos. In the education sector,
standard administrative data are collected annually (on, or example, net and gross enrollment rates, the numbero schools, and the number o teachers). An interesting gure is the unemployment rate o new graduates, which
is collected every year in September.
Te Geret Repe
T ti te ipt te reet rie t tite te e, te geret itre ei
ti ere eerte te ibreet pbi expeitre. This is true or both the ood
and uel crisis in 2008 and to the nancial crises in 2009. Some o the initial relie measures or the ood crisis were
carried over into 2009 to keep the cost o living low, while at the same time the government introduced additional
social protection programmes in the rst o the two stimulus packages implemented to mitigate the impact o the
nancial crisis.
I 2008, t eite te ipt te e rii, te geret itre ti pge itig
tree eprte r itereti.5 In the rst round, in January 2008 the government reduced both personal
and corporate taxes, raised non-taxable income levels and tax exemptions or savings, such as provident unds and
government pension unds, and gave tax benets to small businesses and newly listed companies. 6 The second
round o interventions was aimed at alleviating the hardship o low-incomes groups through expansion o micro-
credit and acilitating the provision o credit by government banks. This eort included: (i) expanding the Small
Medium and Large (SML) village scheme to more villages;7 (ii) maximizing the Village and Urban Community Funds
(VUCF) by enhancing their potential to become centers o community development, eventually upgrading them
to community banks, and by extending coverage to the remaining 1 percent o villages that had not received any
unds;8 (iii) providing unsecured loans through the Government Savings Bank; (iii) providing sot housing loans; (iv)
4 Between 2003 and 2007, the HWS was conducted annually. The survey was not felded in 2008, but the 2009 round is currently being conducted.
5 Keiichiri Oizumi, 2008, Economic policies o new Samak administration, Asia Monthly at http://www.jri.co.jp/english/asia/2008/05/thai.html (see also WB
2008a:18-19)
6 Keiichiri Oizumi (Idem) at http://www.jri.co.jp/english/asia/2008/05/thai.html (see also WB 2008a)
7 By then 73,821 village unds, 3,454 urban unds, and 738 military community unds had been established. See http://thailand.prd.go.th/print.
php?id=3637&type=inside
8 http://thailand.prd.go.th/view_inside.php?id=3637
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
8/24
6
proclaiming a three-year moratorium on repayment loans to armers rom the Bank or Agriculture and Agricultural
Cooperatives; and (v) providing loans to armers who were willing to switch to alternative energy crops. 9 Finally,
the third round o policies announced in June 2008 consisted o six relie measures to be implemented between
July and December o 2008 to mitigate the negative eects o the crisis on low-income groups, namely: (i) reducing
excise tax on gasohol and diesel; (ii) reezing the price o LPG gas or cooking; (iii) reducing water utility charges;
(iv) reducing electricity charges; v) reducing the cost o bus travel and oering ree travel on non-air-conditioned
buses; and vi) providing ree railway travel in third class.10 Following the change o government in December 2008,
one o the new administrations rst actions as the global nancial crisis was unolding was to allocate 13 billion
Baht rom the annual scal budget to extend the 2008 relie measures or another six months up to June 2009 in an
attempt to keep the cost o living down.
Te, i er 2009, I iret repe t te GFc te geret ppre 116.7 bii Bt ppeetr
bget t rt ti pge tt itre e i prteti ere iig trer,triig, eti biie, iree ig r it eepet prjet, ig pprt. By
committing this money on top o the resources that had already been allocated, the government hoped to restore
condence and spur economic growth, while enhancing the quality o lie and the social security o low-income
groups through a number o welare-related measures, which will be described in Section III.
I te e 2009, te geret eie e ti pge 1.43 trii Bt (5 peret
GdP), i i ig pbi ietet i ri prjet r te tr ti 2012 (ee Figre 7).
For this year (2009), 300 billion Baht worth o inrastructure projects are planned. The programme is expected
to create 1.5 million jobs, stimulate private consumption, and support industries in the construction sector.11 Its
ocus is on economic recovery, and no specic welare programmes are included. Where health, education, or
social security is concerned, these investments are concentrated on inrastructure and, to a much lesser degree,
on building the capacity o personnel and institutions rather than providing direct services to vulnerable and
disadvantaged groups.
9 Keiichiri Oizumi (Idem) at http://www.jri.co.jp/english/asia/2008/05/thai.html (see also World Bank, 2008a)
10 http://media.thaigov.go.th/pageconfg/viewcontent/viewcontent1.asp?pageid=472&directory=2122&contents=22026. More detailed inormation at http://
www.biothai.org/cgi-bin/content/news/show.pl?0744
11 http://www.chuaichart.com/en/. Inormation in English is only available or the frst stimulus package, as all inormation about the second package is in Thai.
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
9/24
7
Te tet mt Ei Reprt (mER) ie b te Fi Pi oe (FPo) i J 2009 reit ti
expir pi it tribtig t te reet ipreet te e. This improvement has
maniested itsel in a slowdown o the contraction o domestic consumption (and a related increase in value-added
tax) and a slight increase in private investments compared with previous months. In an eort to cushion the adverse
eects o the crisis on the population and, especially, on its vulnerable segments, the government has adopted
short-term measures in the orm o subsidies, job creation, and tax alleviation benets, while also continuing and
expanding its existing policies to promote public welare and vitalize grassroots communities. The FPO has also
observed some rst signs o recovery in the export sector driven by a revival o the global economy (or detailed
economic monthly indicators see Annex Table 2).12 In August 2009, the dollar value o Thailands exports grew
or the ourth consecutive month as orders or agricultural products, auto parts, and electronics have started to
pick up (Bangkok Post, 2009). This economic stabilization was also refected in a all in unemployment rates to 1.4
percent in July rom 2.1 percent in the rst quarter o 2009, and an expansion o 2.3 percent in overall employment
both in the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors, except or the manuacturing industry sector (or labor market
specics see Annex 3.
12 http://www2.mo.go.th/economic_report_detail.php?id=35
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
10/24
8
II. socIal PRoTEcTIon PolIcIEs and PRoGRammEs: FRom ThE asIan cRIsIs To ThE GloBal FInancIal
cRIsIs and ThE EvoluTIon oF ThE ThaI socIal PRoTEcTIon sysTEm
at te et te ei rii, te ier et ee te iite pei te ere te
rerte te Ti i prteti te, peete, i te pt, b i-i trer
ie geerti prgre. The benets awarded by these systems vary according to a persons work
status (see Table 1).
we te ai i rii tr i 1997, i Ti ie i ter trie i te regi, te i
prteti te er-eepe. In particular, the SP system was ragmented, consisting o a patchwork
o overlapping programmes instead o a comprehensive system that integrated shorter- and longer-term measures
into a consistent whole (Cook et al, 2003 and Suksiriserekul 2000). Thailands ragmented system mainly provided
social security to employees in the ormal sector, especially public employees, through both non-contributory and
contributory schemes. In addition to these employment-related schemes, the government subsidized health care
services or the poor and near-poor and provided social assistance to the elderly, the disabled, and other vulnerable
groups in the orm o cash transers, counseling, training, in-kind assistance, and temporary accommodation.
There were many o these social assistance programmes, most o which were had limited coverage o the specic
eligible groups in that the number o beneciaries was limited by the available budget rather than by actual needs
(ILO, 2008).
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
11/24
9
a i ere eterirte te ppti gre ireig iperie rig te ai i
rii, te Geret Ti e ert t xiize it exitig i prgre. The social security
system or ormal workers was stretched to include old age benets as well as sickness, invalidity, maternity, and
death benets, and child allowances, and existing education and health insurance schemes or the poor were
expanded to include a larger number o beneciaries. Policymakers and experts came to view the system as barely
viable in crisis times and insucient or the longer-term needs o the population and recognized that it had faws in
terms o coverage, eciency, and equitability that needed to be tackled. 13
we te e trte t reer r te ai rii, te Ti geret beg t ier ptig
re preeie i prteti piie. The 9th National Social and Economic Development Plan (2002-
2006) promoted balanced economic and social development and aimed to increase social protection and enhance
human capital. In line with the Plan, the newly established Ministry o Social Development and Human Security
(MSDHS) sponsored the Social Welare Promotion Act B. E. 2546 in 2003 to enable the provision o social servicesto the poor and disadvantaged.14 The Act provides the ramework or more specic sectoral approaches, serving
as the parent act or derivative laws such as the Children Protection Act and the Senior Citizens Act. 15 It also
established a multi-sectoral National Committee on Social Welare Promotion led by the Prime Minister and
consisting o representatives o relevant government agencies and other stakeholders, with corresponding social
welare promotion committees in the provinces and municipalities all over Thailand. this multi-level governance
structure has been entrusted with the development o a social protection system that meets the basic needs o
the Thai people and enables them to achieve a good quality o lie and sel-reliance by ensuring that they receive
minimum amounts o education, health, shelter, employment, and incomes and by allowing them to participate in
decision-making about the provision o services in their communities (Krongkaew, 2007).
uer ti rer, te iitrti iree te ig r i prteti , t, expe te
erge i ite prgre (te -e -tr r re prgre). The coverage o
the SSF and WCF social security schemes was also broadened rom enterprises comprising 10 workers or more to
all enterprises, even those with only with one worker. Moreover, in 2004, an unemployment benet was introduced
into the SSF scheme (Kanjanaphoomin, 2004).16
mt iprtt, et erit tregtee it te itrti i 2001 te -e 30-Bt
rgi et ire ee, i grtee et erie t pepe i t qi r ii
ert ei beet r i erit beet t ft rte 30 Bt per tretet. The National
Health Insurance Oce manages the universal health coverage scheme, which is unded rom tax revenues
and government allocations. Government expenditure on public health care increased rom approximately 9.5
percent o total government expenditure between 1995 and 2005 to 12 percent in 2006 (ILO, 2008). Public health
care comprises civil servants medical benets, health care or ormal sector employees (under social security
13 http://www.thailandoutlook.com/thailandoutlook1/government+policy/the+9th.htm
14 B.E. reers to the Thai Buddhist calendar year with 2546 being equivalent to 2003.
15 Children Protection Act B.E. 2546 and the Senior Citizens Act B. E. 2546
16 http://www.asean-ssa.org/CP_Thailand.doc
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
12/24
10
benets), and a universal health care scheme. In education, the implementation o the Second National Education
Act B.E. 2545 in 2003 extended compulsory education to nine years and the provision o ree education to 12 years,
which meant that the Ministry o Education became responsible or subsidizing schooling rom kindergarten to the
end o secondary school.17
Tee i ite ere piie ere pie b rr pert eiti prgre
irete t ireig te iei -ie e iii, ie reig teir expre
t i ri (Ilo, 2008, Tbe 2). A ourold strategy, involving 13 ministries and 26 aliated bodies, was proposed
to: (i) maximize the potential o the poor; (ii) control armers debts; (iii) build up pro-poor public acilities and
inrastructure; and (iv) reduce unemployment and help low-income workers to acquire more skills. (Thadaniti,
2007).18 Large-scale construction projects, which had been planned to attract oreign investment in the country,
also played a social protection role by providing employment.
III. socIal PRoTEcTIon REsPonsEs To ThE cRIsIs
Fig te ge geret i deeber 2008, e te e iitrti rt ti t
te 13 bii Bt r te bget t exte te 2008 reie ere r ter ix t
p t Je 2009 i ttept t eep te t iig . Only the uel subsidy was cancelled because o
the sharp decline in oil prices. The ree bus and train rides and subsidies or water and electricity charges were
retained with slight modications to ensure that these measures would indeed benet low-income people. 19 For
instance, the limit or ree water supply was reduced rom 50 to 30 cubic meters, and the hal-price scheme rom 80
to 150 units/mth was abolished, while the limit o ree electricity was increased rom 80 to 90 units/mth (BOT, 2009)
A 40 billion Baht tax subsidy programme was also launched that included measures to benet small enterprises
and to preserve employment (Bangkok Post, 2009b).20
I re iret repe t te gb i rii, te geret ppre 116.7 bii Bt ppeetr
bget i er 2009. This stimulus package included several welare and pro-poor measures including the ollowing
(see also Annex 3):21
Theprovisionofone-time2000-Bahthandouts.Thesecashtransfers(calledCheckChuayChartorSave-the-
Nation Check) were distributed to 8.1 million Social Security Fund members and 1.3 state-owned enterprise
employees and civil servants (including districts and village heads) with monthly earning o less than 15,000
Baht or a total o about 19 billion Baht. The handouts were paid out in vouchers to be used to purchase goods
at selected stores or cashed at designated banks.
17 www.onec.go.th/publication/law2545/nation_edbook.pd
18 http://thailand.prd.go.th/ebook/review/content.php?chapterID=9
19 http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2009/01/15/opinion/opinion_30093253.php
20 http://www.aseanaairs.com/thailand_tax_relie_package_to_boost_economy
21 This inormation is collated rom various sources: World Bank, 2009; Khamman, 2009; Bangkok Post, 2009c; 2009d; http://www.bangkokpost.com/
breakingnews/136049/unemployment-compensation-extended; http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/10080/grassroots-get-a-share-o-stimulus
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
13/24
11
Abudgetof6.9billionBahtforbuildingthecapacityoftheunemployed.Theso-calledTonkaArcheep(Career
Sprout) intensive vocational training programme aims to train 500,000 unemployed, soon to be unemployed, and
new graduates in 2009 and 2010, providing them one month o training and three months cash allowances to start
their businesses or proessions. As o September 2009, o the 550,000 applicants, 173,000 had already completed
the training, while 134,000 were no longer in need o the training having ound a job in the meantime. According
to government sources, Tonkla Archeep had already helped 150,000 trainees to nd jobs and another 20,000 to
30,000 to run their own business.22 This targeted intervention is to be complemented by the governments eorts
to accelerate and increase spending on public inrastructure projects to create job opportunities.
Theextensionoffreeeducationfrom12to15years,withthegovernmentpaying70percentoftuitioncostsand
covering the costs o students uniorms, textbooks, and exercise books. The policy budgeted at 18.257 billion
Baht aims to enable 11.8 million students to access education at (almost) no charge. In March 2009, unds were
transerred to more than 40,000 schools or them to purchase books beore the start o the semester in May.23
Thedistributionof500-Bahtallowancestoabout5millionseniorcitizensforaperiodofsixmonths,starting
April. The beneciaries are those aged 60 or over who receive no support rom other government institutions
and who register at local administration oces. The programme has a total budget o about 9 billion Baht.
Unlike in previous schemes, in this new scheme, participants are not selected on the basis o poverty per se,
although the elderly are over-represented among the poor.
Anincreaseoffundingforongoingcommunitydevelopmentprojects.Inparticular,resourcesmadeavailable
or villages to nance projects o their choices under the SML Programme, now renamed Krongkarn Chumchon
Por Piang (or Suciency Economy Community Project) were doubled to a range o 400,000 to 600,000 Baht per
year depending on their size. The spending o the remaining SML budget o 6 billion Baht was expedited, while
another 15 billion Baht was made available rom the supplementary budget.
Grantingoffringebenets(600bahts)toanestimated830,000villagehealthvolunteersfora totalof3billion
Baht. Also in health, about 1 billion Baht was allocated or improving health posts in rural areas.
Provisionofhousingtoabout572lower-rankingpoliceofcers.
si prteti prgre ere tregtee tie te ti pge ite. For example, a 2
billion baht additional budget was reserved or the more than 990,000 people who have registered or universal
coverage, and unemployment benets were extended rom six to eight months or ormal sector employees under
the SSF scheme. To assist poor armers conronted with alling agricultural prices, the government introduced
price intervention schemes or major crops. According to government estimates, such schemes have beneted
22 http://www.nationmultimedia.com/worldhotnews/30111997/Tonkla-Archeep-target-to-be-lowered-amid-recovery http://www.thailandoutlook.tv/toc/
ViewData.aspx?DataID=1018038
23 http://www.nationmultimedia.com/2009/01/08/national/national_30092684.php; http://www.thaivisa.com/orum/15-Years-Free-Education-Programme-
t264549.html
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
14/24
12
more than 1.5 million armers.24 The government also approved 607 million Baht to buy back previously auctioned
armland, costing no more than 2.5 million baths, which has benetted 1,187 armers (Bangkok Post, 2009e). 25
Te e ti pge eie i 2009 eribe i seti I e retitig te e
i t ie pei i prteti ere. As mentioned above, the programme, equal to 5 percent o
GDP, is expected to create 1.5 million jobs, stimulate private consumption, and support industries in the construction
sector. The main social protection eect will be through the generation o employment, as no additional welare
programmes are included. Where health, education, or social security is concerned, the investments have been
concentrated on inrastructure and, to a much lesser degree, on building the capacity personnel and institutions
rather than on providing direct services to vulnerable and disadvantaged groups.
It i it t erte eet te eetiee te pi repe ie t eig i
prteti tiig pert i ti tie rii bee tere i itte r eiee it i te te egree t i te repe etere erbe grp. Most o the measures o the rst
stimulus package are still ongoing, having been launched around March or April 2009, and with some having
experienced a slow start. A recent report by the World Bank (2009) assessed that the rst stimulus package had
been modestly pro-poor, with 9.4 percent o the beneciaries versus 8.5 percent o the overall population being
poor. The report observed that the package resulted in a bias against poor in the inormal sector because o the
particular mechanisms that were used to disburse unds rapidly (such as the social security system or the 2000-
Baht hand-outs) and because there was insucient targeting o vulnerable groups. Vulnerable households in the
urban sector are the most under-represented among the beneciaries o the package, but the measures have also
ailed to reach all o the poor in rural areas even though the package contained specic programmes directed at
rural areas (see Table 2). A report by the Thai Development Research Institute (TDRI) titled the Economic Shocks
and the Vulnerable in Thailand that was published in March 2009 contended that the needs o the poorest were not
suciently met by the rst package and that interventions, now as in previous crises, were not well-targeted due
to a lack o basic inormation that could accurately identiy the vulnerable segments o the population (Jitsuchon
and Siamwalla, 2009).
24 http://thailand.prd.go.th/view_inside.php?id=4334
25 http://www.bangkokpost.com/breakingnews/136049/unemployment-compensation-extended
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
15/24
13
Te ee ibreet geret i e te e tgibe iiti te prgre eie
te ti prgre. As o May 2009, only 55.8 billion Baht (or 47 percent) o the rst stimulus package
was spent, mostly through public welare programmes. The our programmes with the highest disbursement rates
ranging between 93 and 59 percent were in order the 2000-Baht Save-the-Nation Check programme, the 15-year
ree education programme, the provision o utility subsidies to households, and the distribution o allowances to the
elderly. Other programmes, especially those involving construction projects, have had much lower disbursement
levels, with some o the smaller programmes, such as the construction o village inrastructure and the provision o
housing or the police orce, still waiting to begin. I there have been any delays in the last three months o this scal
year, this will carry the unds over to the 2010 scal year, which started in October 2009. Moreover, these delays
may dilute the impact o the stimulus measures or there may be a risk that disbursements will be accelerated at
the expense o quality and accountability (see also Annex 3).26 Interviews have suggested, or instance, that the
Tonkla Archeep programme may have broadened its selection criteria as well as the kind o training that it provided
to try to meet its target ater a very slow start. In any case, Tonkla Archeep has come to be seen as a success, andater considering discontinuing it because o the rebound in employment, the government resolved to continue the
programme with an additional ocus on the workorce in the agricultural sector. 27
Iv. socIal PolIcy IssuEs lookInG FoRwaRd
a rp iree i pbi ebt i iere pibe brrier t reizig ger-ter, trtr piie
tt ie te reizti eee preeie iger qit i prteti te.28The policy
measures introduced as a response to the crisis have not dealt with the limitations o a non-unied social welare
system that excludes many Thai workers rom social security benets. As seen in other countries, the preoccupation
with stopping the downturn o the economy has understandably compelled the government to ocus on short term
saety-net measures and continuing support through existing social assistance, welare and poverty alleviation
programmes. As a result, no substantial reorms have been undertaken to strengthen the cornerstones o the
social protection system. Only recently, discussion has been revived on the long-pending questions o improving
the quality o UC and harmonizing o health nancing schemes and o realizing a universal pension system.
si aite
a te e reer, Ti i e t eie t bi it exitig i ite prgre
e ere r te rii. In particular, it will ace decisions regarding whether to introduce regular
household social assistance payments and how to strengthen its targeting mechanisms. The Governments social
protection response to the crisis, which was strong and timely, ocused mostly on existing social assistance and
poverty alleviation programmes, and on additional measures such as the one-time cash transer. Social assistance
currently available to the poor centers around universal health insurance, education subsidies and limited additional
benets or selected groups. The Thai welare system provides signicant support to its citizen in the ormal sector.
However, the crisis also highlighted the need or more comprehensive measures that can reach a larger share
26 BOT 2009
27 http://thainews.prd.go.th/en/news.php?id=255209180011 http://www.nationmultimedia.com/worldhotnews/30111997/Tonkla-Archeep-target-to-be-lowered-
amid-recovery
28 Keiichiri Oizumi, (Idem) at http://www.jri.co.jp/english/asia/2008/05/thai.html
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
16/24
14
o the population. Looking orward, it will be especially important to consider how to strike a balance between
household based and area-based approaches to social protection and poverty reduction and to consider how to
strengthen mechanisms through which to identiy and target vulnerable households. For example, currently each
programme has its own separate targeting system in place, but introducing common databases and targeting tools
could allow or signicant economies o scale in programme administration, as well as greater fexibility to adjust
in ace o emerging vulnerabilities.
uier het cerge
a etr piee Ti i prteti rer, te ier et erge prgre e
iprtt ege it bee re re priet. Ater having achieved universal health coverage,
quality improvement is even more o a priority to maintain UC positive outcomes and avoid developing a two-class
system o care. Evidence shows that the UC has contributed to increased and more equitable utilization o services,
to a decrease in the incidence o catastrophic health expenditure and a drastic drop in out o pocket expenses,resulting in better health outcomes and an improvement o income levels or poor households (WB 2008; Prakongsai
et al 2009; Palu 2009). Still, many challenges remain. All Thais are in principle covered by health insurance, but
benets and costs vary greatly among the three plans currently available since they are managed independently
and with little coordination. The ragmentation o the insurance system contributes to high administrative costs,
inecient use o scarce human resources, poor oversight and lack o transparency, limited purchasing power,
inconsistent providers incentives, and dierentiated standards o care at the disadvantage o the poor (Palu 2009;
ILO 2008).
dii t ipre geet et rize te exitig tree ei ee
bee reiigrte reet b te cbiet reti i er septeber 2009 t igrte ie ire
ssF eber r uc t sss. Some ear that SSF cannot aord to expand its coverage and oer ree medical
treatment, death benets, disability, and compensation benet in case o birth to an additional 5.8 million people
in a time o recession, also considering that the government had already a debt o 20 billion in contribution to the
SSF. Others worry that by drawing unds rom NHSO to contribute to the SSO, while placing the burden o more
expensive elderly care on UC, the government is undermining the sustainability o UC. For those in avor, however,
a greater role o contributory schemes in health can help the government manage cost pressures, and ree unds
or other welare measures. Resistance to uniy the schemes into a single structure and und management remains
high, making o a step-by-step harmonization o selected procedures, payments and benets procedures a more
easible option.
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
17/24
15
uier Pei ste
I te er e te jr ietet i i prteti i gig t be e tiie ig , r
i eer pti re beig ie. At the moment only workers in the ormal sector have social security
protection: SSF counts 10 million members and GPF about 2 million, with additional coverage available to employees
through voluntary provident unds, long-term equity and retirement mutual unds. The to-be- established saving
unds would target an estimated 24 to 25 million people below 60 year who have no coverage, mainly low-income
workers in the inormal sector.29 The levels o contributions and benets and how to manage the und will be the
key policy debates in the months to come. With the rapid aging o the Thai population, there is pressure to ensure
sucient income standards to the growing number o elderly. The distribution o allowances to senior citizen that
started as a response to the GFC could rapidly turn into a more permanent measure, closer to a social pension. As
mentioned, contrary to what had happened in the past, in this occasion participants were not selected on the bases
o poverty criteria.
It ee te tt te piti te Ti geret i gr itig tr regiti tt te
ere ee te Ti ppti t be pt i rii tie, tt trg i prteti
te i eeti i rii e i r tie. However, whether this shit will indeed materialize is
highly dependent on the restoring o political stability and an ecient use o more limited resources. Careul study
o vulnerable groups and assessment o relie measures and crisis responses would making strategic choices
in allocating unds to programmes and in targeting those most in need. Political will is also needed to expand
the social protection discourse beyond nationality boundaries to ensure that all those that live in Thailand and
contribute to the Thai economy are cared or.
acknowlEdGEmEnTs
This report was prepared by Martin Reichhuber (Section I) and Rosalia Sciortino (Sections II-IV) as an input to the
regional review o the social impact o and policy responses to the global nancial crisis.
29 They would contribute monthly sums, receiving some matching contribution rom the government, thus being entitled to a pension.
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
18/24
16
REFEREncEs
n.a (2006). Poverty in Thailand. The Second ASEAN+3 Seminar on Poverty Reduction 25-29 September 2006 ,Beijing. Powerpoint
presentation
Bangkok Post (2009a). Annual growth o 2-3% oreseen. July 22, 2009: B2
Bangkok Post (2009b). PM sees rebound in second hal. February 17, 2009: B1
Bangkok Post (2009c). Allowance or elderly delayed or two weeks. February 6, 2009: 2
Bangkok Post (2009d). Cash aid lits old olks spirits. February 7, 2009: 11
Bangkok Post (2009e). Where does the money come rom? January 31, 2009: 10
Bangkok Post (2009). ADB orecasts brightens. September 23, 2009: B1
Bangkok Post (2009g). A resh start. January 11, 2009: B1
Bangkok Post (2009h). Civil servants reined in over medical bills. September 5, 2009: 2
Bangkok Post (2009i). Exports continue to gain in August. September 18, 2009: B1
BOT (2009). Thailands Economic and Financial Development. Powerpoint presentation, Bank o Thailand (BOT)
Cook, S. N. Kabeer, and G. Suwannarat (2003). Social Protection in Asia. Har-Anand Publications, New Delhi
(2006). Country Development Project on Social Protection II (CDP-SP II): Summary o Activities and Outcomes, August 2003-
February 2006. Unpublished report.
ILO (2008). Inter-regional Project: How to Strengthen Social Protection Coverage in the Context o the European Union Agenda
on Decent Work and Promoting Employment in the Inormal Economy. Thailand: A Case Study. International Labour
Organization, Social Security Department, Geneva.
ILO (2009) The eect o the Global Economic Crisis on Asian Migrant Workers and Governments responses, February
Kanjanaphoomin, N. (2004). Pension Fund, Provident Fund, and the Social Security System in Thailand. Paper presented at the
International Conerence on Pensions in Asia: Incentives and their Role in Retirement, Thailand
Khamman, S. (2009). Overviews o Social Protection: Lessons Learned rom Thailand. Powerpoint presentation at the NESDB
workshop on social protection on September 11, 2009.
Krongkaew, M. (2007). The Elderly and their Social Protection in Thailand. Paper presented at Parallel 4 Session: New Global
RealityImplications or Development, Subtopic 1: Aging Population in AsiaToward Sustainable Welare Society (JICA),Global Development Network (GDN) Annual Conerence in Beijing, 16 January 2007.
MAP (2009). Critical Times. Migration Action Project, Chiang Mai
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
19/24
17
Palu, T. (2009). Health Financing in Thailand: Issues or Discussion. Powerpoint presentation at the NESDB workshop on social
protection on September 11, 2009.
Prakongsai, P., S. Limwattanon, and V. Tangcharoensathien (2009). The Equity Impact o the Universal Coverage Policy:
Lessons rom Thailand. Advances in Health Economics and Health Services Research. 21:57-81
Phongpaichit, P. (2004). Financing Thaksinomics. Unpublished research paper.
Rado, Istvan (2008). Thaksinomics in Light o the Heterodox View on Economic Development. Journal o Contemporary Eastern
Asia, Volume 7, No.1:19-37
Somchai, Jitsuchon and Ammar Siamwalla (2009). Economic Shocks and Vulnerable Thailand: A Case Study o Rising Food and
Fuel Prices. Thailand Development Research Institute, Bangkok.
Suksiriserekul, S. (2000). Thailand In Social Saety Net Programming and the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia.
Sukunpanit, T. (2008). Thailand: Universal Health Care Coverage through Pluralistic Approaches. International Labor OrganizationsSubregional Ofce or East Asia, Bangkok.
Thadaniti, S. (2005). Urban Poverty and Social Saety Nets in Thailand. Paper presented at the East Asian Development Network
(EASDN) Conerence on Urban Poverty and Social Saety Net in East Asia, Bejing.
World Bank (2007). Thailand Economic Monitor. Bangkok
World Bank (2008). Social Protection in Thailand. Briefng Notes. Bangkok
World Bank (2009a), Thailand Economic Monitor June 2009
World Bank (2009b), The impacts o the Economic Downturn on Workers in Thailand, report by the Asian Research Center or
Migration
World Bank (2009c). Thailand Economic Monitor April-June 2009. Bangkok
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
20/24
18
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
21/24
19
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
22/24
20
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
23/24
21
-
7/31/2019 COUNTRY REPORT OF THE ASEAN ASSESSMENT ON THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS: THAILA
24/24
One Vision, One Identity, One Community
www.asean.org