cody ortz capstone 2014

8/10/2019 Cody Ortz Capstone 2014

1/38

Supporting Paper for

Capstone Recital

of

Cody Ortz

November 22, 2014

Approved and Evaluated by:

Dr.Daniel Perttu December XX, 2014Capstone Advisor Date


2/38

1

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr.DeSalvo for her hard work and encouragement in preparation

for this recital, but also for all that she has taught me over the last three years .I owe another

thanks to Mr.Andrew Erb for being a great studio teacher my first three years at Westminster

and for teaching me that an education is not a destination, but a journey.I would also like to

thank Dr.Timothy Preston Winfield for showing me new ways to think about playing, being a

great inspiration, and helping me make the most out of my time this semester.I must finally

thank my parents for giving me my love of music, supporting me in all that Ive done, and

getting me to where I am todayI owe you the world!


3/38

2

Introduction

The first piece of the recital, Someone to Watch Over Meby George Gershwin, was

selected for both its popularity as a show tune and its lyrical nature .Being the first song that the

performer ever performed (though it was a different arrangement), it is a piece with significant

meaning to the performer.It is placed first in the recital for two main reasons.First, the piece

functions well as an opener because it is popular, catchy and highly lyrical; it draws audience

members into the performance and prepares them for some of the more contemporary pieces that

will follow.Secondly, and more importantly, the placement of this piece is symbolic of the

beginning of the performers time as a soloist.The culmination of this point of the performers

musical career begins with the same song that began it .

The next two pieces on the program are George EnescosLgende for Trumpet and

Alexandra Pakhmutovas Concerto for Trumpet.These two pieces are placed early in the recital

because of the physical demand required by the composition.However, since both pieces have

neither a significant connection to the performer, nor a potential popularity with the audience,

they would not function well as an opening.Lgende was selected as a technical challenge.The

difficult finger patterns combined with extensive use of multiple tonguing create a unique

challenge unlike those in the other pieces of the recital .The Concertois significant in both its

challenge to the performer and its outright beauty.Aesthetic appeal is highly important in music

and is something that is shared by all the pieces on the program.For the Cocnertoin particular

though, it is an impressive feat of the composer to be able to compose such an extensive piece

that is both intriguing and beautiful to hear.


4/38

3

The second movement from Eric Ewazens Sonata for Trumpetserves as both a stylistic

contrast to the previous two pieces and an opportunity for the performer to collect himself

physically and mentally.After the extreme physical demands of the previous two pieces, the

frequent resting, lyrical nature and tame range of the Sonataallows the performer to relax the

muscles during performance.This also has the psychological effect of calming the performer and

allowing him to feel comfortable on stage.It is very stylistically different in terms of the overall

mood of the piece.Ewazens Sonata is almost like a lullaby and, while the previous two pieces

frequently exercised loud dynamics, rarely reaches an extremely high dynamic level.

The final piece of the recital will be an instrumental arrangement of Nessun dorma

from Giacomo Puccinis incredibly famous opera, Turandot.This piece is not only a very

moving aria, but it is also a very catchy one.The purpose of a closing piece is to uplift the

audience and give them a lasting memory from the performance.The new sonic texture with

antiphonal brass combined with the beautiful writing of Puccini creates an awe-inspiring musical

moment.

George Gershwin: Someone to Watch Over Me

Historical Context. George Gershwin (1898-1937) was one of the foremost composers

for jazz musicians and musical theatre in the early 20 thcentury, best known for his compositions

Rhapsody in Blue, An American in Paris, and Porgy and Bess.1Working in conjunction with his

brother, Ira (1896-1983), Gershwin is credited with the composition of over 500 songs.

1Charles Schwartz, Gershwin: His Life And Music(New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1973).


5/38

4

Gershwin showed very little interest in music until he was roughly ten years old.He began

playing the piano that his parents bought for his brother and began studying with Charles

Hambitzer in 1910.Hambitzer taught Gershwin both traditional and contemporary piano

technique and encouraged him to attend orchestra concerts.Gershwin went home after each

concert and learn to play the songs on the piano by ear.2Until his death in 1918, Hambitzer acted

as Gershwins mentor and musical guide.Gershwin later studied with composer Rubin

Goldmark.

The Gershwin Brothers lived in New York City and were surrounded by a large

community of musicians who would often collaborate with (or even ghost write for) the brothers.

These collaborations, particularly with orchestra leader Paul Whiteman, helped to establish jazz

as serious music.3Someone to Watch Over Me was written for the 1926 musical Oh! Kay!

and, despite Gershwins original vision of an up-tempo swing tune, became one of the most

widely-performed jazz ballads of all time.4Some of the most famous performances of the song

include those done by Frank Sinatra, Barbra Streisand, Ella Fitzgerald, Chet Baker and Chris

Botti.

In 2006, the New York Philharmonic Principal Trumpet, Philip Smith, recorded a solo

album featuring songs from various composers including Leonard Bernstein, George Enescu,

Eric Ewazen and George Gershwin.On this album, Someone to Watch Over Me was arranged

by composer/conductor Joseph Turrin who has worked extensively with orchestras such as the

New York Philharmonic.He was commissioned to write several pieces for the orchestra.His

2Edward Jablonski, Gershwin(New York: Doubleday, 1987).

3Ibid.

4Schwartz.


6/38

5

arrangement of Someone to Watch Over Me, for Trumpet and Piano, utilizes several

compositional styles characteristic of different musical eras, including typical jazz harmonies and

Alberti bass.Though the piece is not commercially available for performance purposes, it was

transcribed in 2014 for this Capstone Recital.

Analysis.This particular arrangement of George Gershwins Someone to Watch Over

Me is a modern adaptation of the highly popular show tune.Because it is based on the jazz

standard version and not the 1926 Broadway edition, it varies considerably from Gershwins

original setting.The whole piece is in strophic form with two themes used in various styles,

despite remaining in one key.Because it is in a strophic form, recognizable themes are repeated

with slight variations to add musical variety (Table 1).

Table 1Gershwin

18 ( )

823 A (B )

2326

2734 B ( )3542 A (B , )

4351 B (C )

5235 A (B , ,

)

6675 C ,

In the beginning of the piece (mm.1 to 8), there is a substantial introduction in which the

piano accompaniment establishes the key, style, and mood of the piece.This introduction utilizes

figuration that is characteristic of the mid-Romantic Era and does not use easily-recognizable

thematic material from the main section of the piece.The first theme (Figure 1.1) is stated by

soloist in measure 9 and is used as a point of familiarity throughout the pieces varied styles .The


7/38

6

style used for this theme is always a Ballad Style, though it goes through slight embellishments

later in the piece.

Figure 1.1

This first theme is stated twice and then transitions to the second theme (Figure 1 .2)

which arrives in the pickups to measure 27.The style of this short section (measures 27 to 34) is

that of a slow waltz.The meter changes from common time to and significant emphases are

placed (both by the soloist and the accompanist) on the first beats of each measureas if one

were to dance to the music.This section is the first true departure from the theatrical style of

Gershwin and a stark contrast must be made by the performers to give this section its full impact .

Figure 1.2

The middle section of the piece (measures 35-42) is a single restatement of the first

theme (Figure 1.1) that reestablishes the style of the original ballad, although there is some

embellishment through the addition of runs at the end of certain phrases.There is an interlude

(measures 43-51) played by the piano in which the secondary theme (Figure 1 .2) appears to

make reference to the stylistic and harmonic aspects of the Classical Era.These aspects heavily

emphasize the use of clear phrasing in tonic, predominant, and dominant sections.Turrin decided

here to relinquish the use of jazz voicing that would have been used by Gershwin (primarily

extended harmonies and drop-two voicing) to further add to the contrast between styles.This


8/38

7

section (measures 43 to 51) features the accompanist and makes use of rubato tempos that add to

the development of the thematic material.

At measure 52, there is a return to the primary theme .In this melodic return, there is not

only melodic embellishment, but also some structural chromaticism (ex.measure 58) used both

to add drama and propel the piece into the final melodic ascent in measure 62 .The piece ends

with a coda section (measures 66 to 75) which mixes the introductory material and the opening

contour of the primary theme, creating a very aesthetically-pleasing close to the piece.

Performance/Interpretive Challenges.There are several performance traits to keep in

mind when performing this arrangement of Someone to Watch Over Me. Firstly, this piece

was originally a vocal ballad which requires the trumpet player to imitate the tone of a singer as

closely as possible.The player must strive for a dark, rich tone which is a particular concern for

a trumpet player who has a naturally bright timbre.Doing this requires sensitivity to the size and

shape of the oral cavity, as well as the quality of air support.(Dark timbres come from large,

round oral cavities with a solid air stream.) There must also be a light, flowing quality to the

music, emulating the characteristics of a jazz vocalist in the 1920s.Additionally, there should

be an organic interpretation to the rubato sections that appear in the piece .While it is important

to know when and where rubato moments occur before rehearsal of the piece, the exact

interpretation of them should be done in the moment.To ensure that this interpretation is not

overly rigid, it is suggested that the performer memorize the piece (as a vocalist would do).This

organic nature of the time throughout the piece, however, poses a particular problem for the

accompanistit is exponentially more difficult to play together when there are frequent shifts in


9/38

8

tempo.One section that exemplifies this issue would be measures 39-40, where the solo line

moves out of rhythm during a slight accelerando.For the line to be effective musically, both the

accompanist and the soloist must arrive at the downbeat of measure 40 precisely together.Both

musicians must have an identical interpretation of the time shift in order for this to occur.

George Enescu:Lgende for Trumpet

Historical Context.Born in Botosani, Romania, George Enescu (1881-1955) was one of

the most important of the countrys musicians in the 20th

century.5Enescu began composing at a

very young age of five.Though only short pieces remain (most of them pieces for violin and

piano), it is clear that Enescu had the makings of a fine composer.In 1888 (age 7), he was

accepted in the Vienna Conservatory; not only was he the youngest student ever admitted, but he

was also the first non-Austrian to be allowed to study there .While staying at the home of a

professor, Enescu met Johannes Brahms who would become a great influence on Enescus life

and musical works.6In 1895, he moved to Paris to study composition with famed composer

Gabriel Faur.During his time at the Paris Conservatory, Enescu continued to draw from his

Romanian heritage and wrote numerous pieces based on Romanian folk music.

Lgende for Trumpetwas written in 1906 and represents an arrival point in the solo

repertoire of the trumpet.

7

A mindset frequently taught by Merri Franquin, professor of cornet at

the Paris Conservatory, this piece marks the full development of the trumpet as a completely

5Istvan Kosztandi, The Great Romanian Composer and Master of the Violin, George Enescu, the Creative and

Virtuoso Violinist(Budapest: Liszt Ferenc Academy of Music, 2013).6Noel Malcolm, George Enescu(Toccata Press, 1990).

7Ibid.


10/38

9

chromatic instrumentsubstantially more developed than the trumpets of the Classical Era.The

piece was premiered by Franquin in the same year that it was written .Compositionally, this

piece epitomizes Enescus musical style.There is a distinct Romanian nature present in the

mood of the whole piece, but there is also a considerable amount of Impressionistic writing.8The

Impressionistic writing (i.e.,nontraditional harmonic progressions, parallel chords, frequent

figuration, and unresolved non-chord tones) comes as a result of his time studying with Faur

(who also taught Maurice Ravela prominent figure in Impressionist music).The mood of the

piece captures what Enescu described in his memoirs as the essence of Romanian music.A

general characteristic of our [Romanian] national music is the ubiquitous sadness, present even

in happiness.The dor[painful longing, nostalgia] is indefinite yet deeply moving.But to me this

music is, above all, a music of reveriea music prone to the minor mode, the color of nostalgic

dreaming.9

Analysis.EnescusLgende is a five-section rhapsody written in a way that develops and

embellishes a fairly small amount of thematic material.Two arguments could be made for the

overall form of this piece: a Rondo with two alternating sections or an extended ternary form,

where the last two sections are repeated (Table 2).While a Rondo Form would have its merits

(particularly that the themes alternate with A being in the same key each time), the extended

ternary argument

10

is more convincing for several reasons.First, there are only two thematic

8Frederick Sienkiewicz, F. A. (2005).Research in Performance: Analysis of Five Trumpet Works.Boston, MA:

University of Massachusetts.9Malcolm.

10Sienkiewicz.


11/38

10

sections that alternate and in most Rondo forms, there are usually at least three.Additionally,

when the A theme returns in a Rondo it is almost always an immediate return to the tonic key .

However, when the A theme returns in this piece, it is not always in C-minor.It always ends on

C-minor, however, and this is more typical of a ternary form.

Table 2Enescu

117 A C, (A), C , C

. # A, B

2030 B A, . 3143 A C A ,

4467 B

(C )

6878 A ( ) C A ,

,

The first section of the piece (measures 1 to 17) establishes the key of C-minor .The first

four measures spell out the theme (Figure 2.1) which is a slow, mournful melody.There is a

moderate degree of harmonic variety in the first 17 measures.The accompaniment is very simple

and simply provides chordal support for the soloist.Where the soloist does not play a moving

line, the piano takes over as the soloistic voice.At the end of this section, there is a short

transition section that prepares the listener for the tonality of the B section.


12/38

11

Figure 2.1 (A Theme)

The second section begins at measure 20 and lasts until measure thirty.This section is

written in 3/4 (as opposed to 6/4 at the beginning of the piece), but the meter is not the only thing

that contrasts with the first section.The B section is full of chromatic runs and impressionistic

gestures.This B section does remain quite Romantic, harmonically speaking, but there are

moments in the second B section that stray further from the traditional approach to chordal

progression.The thematic material in this section (Figure 2.2) is similar in contour to the first,

but shares very little else with it.The connection to the A material lies in the piano which, in

addition to the figuration ubiquitous in this section, also has short motives from the first section.

Figure 2.2 (B Theme)

After the first B section, there is a short piano interlude that returns to the A theme .The

soloist restates this theme an octave higher than the first time it appears and ends with a tonally

unstable embellishment of the melodic material in the piano.This melodic embellishment

prolongs the dominant chord and leads the listener to believe that the piece is coming to a close .

However, this section only builds to a strong half cadence; the tonic does not reappear until the


13/38

12

return of the B theme in measure 44.It is here that the argument for ternary form is strongest .

This A section ends with terminative material as would be expected in traditional ternary form.

However, it does not end on the tonicit ends on a half cadence and then returns to the material

from the B section.This subversion of a strong cadence leaves the listener in a state of unease

until the final section, which is back on the tonic.It functions similarly to a prolonged cadence,

but on a much larger scale.This is not something that would typically fall into the style of a

Rondo, but aligns more accurately with an extended ternary form.

The B section (measures 44 to 67) is characterized by Impressionistic variation of the

thematic material in the original B sectionimpressionistic insofar as the traditional harmonic

progressions seen in the first B section are replaced by sequences and parallelism.Melodically,

this section begins by transposing the motive up a minor second from its first statement.The

harmonic accompaniment, though, is what is truly interesting.In the first B section, the

harmonies were very tonal.Understandably, they were highly chromatic, but they still had a

sense of tonal progressiontonic, predominant, dominant, tonic.In B, Enescu foregoes the

feeling of progression and instead uses parallelism, a trait of Debussy and the Impressionistic

style of writing.Measures 45 to 51 (Figure 2.3) could easily be mistaken as a type of sequential

modulation.However, the repeated harmonic gesture (parallel chordsalso known as chord

planing) in measures 60 to 62 (Figure 2.4) suggest that Enescu is actually blending

Impressionism with his more Romantic style of writing.This parallelism creates a sense of

unease and further prolongs the cadence that was averted in measure 43 .


14/38

13

Figure 2.311

Figure 2.412

11Sienkiewicz.

12Ibid.


15/38

14

The final of this section of this piece (measures 68 to 78) is a final restatement of the A

theme.It returns to the somber nature of the opening and finally returns to the tonic of the piece

in the last three bars after a clear cadence.This section does not start out on the tonic; instead, it

begins in D major and directly modulates to C-minor in the measure 70 (where the soloist

reenters).This key structure suggests even further that the form of this piece is an extended

ternary form, as opposed to a Rondo.This section is a homophonic texture, similar to the

opening and ends solidly on the tonic.The end of this section dies away and leaves the listener

with nothing but an echo of the main theme ringing in their ears.

Performance/Interpretive Challenges.Though this piece is not particularly extensive

(roughly 6 minutes performance time), it requires significant consideration to rehearse

effectively. Perhaps the most prevalent issue in the piece is the metric interpretation.The piece is

marked at a quarter note equaling 54 bpm.Such a slow tempo demands very careful attention.

To work around this tempo, the piece should be counted on the eighth note (equaling 108) which

makes it much easier for the accompanist and soloist to match speed .There should not, however,

be emphasis placed on the eighth note.This is a common issue among many performers;

musicians (often unknowingly) place accents on downbeats, regardless of whether or not they

should be accented.Placing this metric accent on twice as many notes (due to counting in double

time) breaks up the phrase in an unmusical way.A similar issue can be found in the

interpretation of various rhythms, namely the 32ndnotes in measure 29.Several performers (Phil

Smith, Matthias Hofs, and Thomas Duis) do not play these 32ndnotes as written, but syncopate


16/38

15

them or otherwise play them out of time.While this helps the line flow to a certain extent, it is

not the correct rhythm.

Some challenges that have been extensively addressed in preparation for this recital

include articulation and dynamic choices.In the B sections of this piece, there are numerous

multiple tonguing demands.Multiple tonguing requires using both the tip and middle of the

tongue, as opposed to single tonguing which only uses the tip .While double tonguing (groups of

two or four) is only interpreted as Ta-Ka (front-middle), triple tonguing (groups of three or six)

can be altered depending on the player and the musical demands.The two interpretations are Ta-

Ta-Ka (front-front-middle) or Ta-Ka-Ta (front-middle-front).To an untrained listener, there will

not be a significant aural difference between the two.However, a keen musician should be able

to hear that Ta-Ka-Ta has a different feelalmost a liltthan Ta-Ta-Ka.For this recital, Ta-Ta-

Ka is the preferred interpretation because the groupings suggest a flowing line, not a lilting line.

The final challenge addressed is the dynamic ranges throughout the piece.In particular, the final

section of the piece which has the soloist performing atpianowith a mute.The soloist should

focus on playing with a full, present sound before striving to play at a soft dynamic .Otherwise,

the soloist will not be heardespecially in a large auditorium.

Alexandra Pakhmutova: Concerto for Trumpet

Historical Context.Famous for her 400+ vocal pieces, Alexandra Pakhmutova was born

in Stalingrad, Russia, in November of 1929.She studied music at both the Central Music School

and the Moscow State Conservatory, finishing her graduate work in 1953.In all of her music, it


17/38

16

is the humanistic approach embodied in lyrical song that made her so well known .13

Pakhmutova has won numerous awards including the Peoples Artist of the USSR (1984), the

Lenin Komsomol Award (1967), the State Prize of the USSR (1975, 1982), and the Hero of

Socialist Labor (1990).

Pakhmutovas Concerto was written in 1955 and was premiered by Ivan Pavlov, the

trumpet instructor at the Moscow Conservatory, later that year.Though the piece was not written

for anyone in particular, it was made famous by the Soviet Unions most prominent trumpet

soloist, Timofei Dokshitzer (1921-2005).In 1935, Dokshitzer began studying at the Central

Music School where he met and began corresponding with Pakhmutova.At this time, the

available trumpet literature was very limited; very few solos were allowed to be performed in the

USSR.(Interestingly, EnescusLgende was banned in the Soviet Union at this time, likely due

to his heritage.) Dokshitzer performed the piece several times starting in 1955, but thought that

there were some characteristics of the Concerto that did not fit the tendencies of the trumpet.In

1978, he asked Pakhmutova to rewrite two sections of the piece to make it easier for the player

and more characteristic of trumpet playing.On this recital, the original 1955 version will be

performed.The differences between the 1955 and 1978 versions of the piece will be discussed

later.

Analysis.Pakhmutovas Concerto for Trumpet and Orchestrais a through-composed

solo written in a style that defies classification into a Classical form (such as Sonata, Rondo,

13Holly Cook,Alexandra Pakhmutova's Concerto for Trumpet and Orchestra(Los Angelos, CA: University of

Southern California, 2012).


18/38

17

Binary, Ternary, Strophic, etc.).However, there is a large degree of compostional unity

displayed throughout the piece (see Table 3).

Table 3Pakhmutova

133 , , ,

3878 A A,

()

79150 B , , (

)

151186 .

187209 C B ,

, , ,

210240 . A ,

241290 A

B A ,

291350 B B

351381 A A

382430 B ,

464492 A A A , ,

5

The piece begins with a soft introduction (measures 1-33) that exposes the primary

thematic material that will be used in the A sections of the piece .This theme (Figure 3.1) starts

on an ascending perfect fourth and heavily implies the tonic key of Eb minor throughout the

melody.The accompaniment in the beginning is very thin, using little counterpoint and

frequently sustaining chords.In measure 34, the accompaniment changes style and becomes

more agitated which foreshaddows the first A section.For two reasons, it is argued that measures

34-37 are a short transition to A which arrives definitively at measure 38.Firstly, those four


19/38

18

measures are primarily in Bb, the dominant of this section (which is irrefutably Eb minor in

measure 38).Secondly, there is no thematic material used in these four measures, either in the

orchestral score or the piano reduction.While there is a rehearsal marking at measure 34, this is

most likely due to a change in tempo and not a significant change in form.

Figure 3.1

Throughout the first A section (measures 38-78), there is a significant use of

chromaticism and tonicization, but there is still a hierarchy of tonality.This section begins in Eb

minor, moves to the dominant in measure 46, and returns to the tonic (Eb minor) in measure 63 .

The motivic writing is very melodic and is driven mostly by the flow of the solo line .There is a

key change in measure 79 which, along with the stark change in style, marks the beginning of the

first B section (measures 79-150).The theme in this section (Figure 3.2) is a half-time melody in

F minor; first stated by the piano, it is built on two 8-bar phrases .The theme is developed

through this section and eventually morphs into the next section at measure 151.

Figure 3.2

Measures 151-186 are a transitional section that not only connects the only two slow

section of the piece, but also develops motives from both the A and B sections .The theme from

this section (Figure 3.3) is roughly based on the theme from the A section.It is based on an


20/38

19

opening fourth and has strong harmonic implications, but has a different melodic contour and

phrase structure.This section is mostly in F minor, but uses some tonicization and

choromaticism to add variety to the progression.This section ends with a definitive cadence on

F, followed by common tone modulation to the next keyF minor to E major, using Ab/G# as

the common tone (Figure 3.4).

Figure 3.3

Figure 3.4

Perhaps the most unique section of the piece, the C section (measures 187-209) implies a

tonic, but but does not arrive there until measure 205.There is a written key change that displays

4 sharps, suggesting either C# minor or its relative major, E major.Pakmutova intentionally

wrote this key signature, so there is very little room for interpretation with respect to its purpose.

The melodic writing and the tonality of the section suggest E major instead of C# minor, but it is

written enharmonically (Figure 3.5).The reason why the melody implies E major is purely

auralthe melodic B natural sounds like the dominant of the melody and the D# sounds like the

leading tone.What is interesting about this section is that it never harmonically arrives on E


21/38

20

major as the tonic.It begins with an F-minor chord in measure 187 which acts like a suspension

to E.However, when the chord does arrive on E in the next bar, it is a dominant 7 chord which

acts like a secondary dominant.Pakhmutova uses this harmonic writing to delay a sense of

finality and create a sense of continual motion throughout the section.

Figure 3.5

The transitional section in measures 210-240 marks the beginning of a move from

beautiful development to energetic conclusion.This section uses a rhythmic motive (Figure 3.6)

to propel the piece forward.There is little melodic development in this section, but the beginning

of the next section (measures 241-290) is similar and could be considered a development of

section E.This development section is actually the A section and blends thematic material from

both the A section and the E section.It is tonally unstable, frequently modulating, which adds to

the sense of forward motion.

Figure 3.6

The next section (measures 291-350) develops the thematic material from the B section.

Initially stated by the piano again, the theme is transformed from a gentle, flowing melody into a

forceful statement of the theme (Figure 3.7).This section gives way to a shortened version of the


22/38

21

A section (measures 351-381) which uses elements of both the original statement and later

developments of that section.

Figure 3.7

From measures 382 to 430, Pakhmutova writes a full statement of the B theme in the

accompaniment which little to no thematic material (from B) in the solo voice.Instead,

Pakhmutova gives the soloist a countermelody (Figure 3.8) that metrically and harmonically

complements the theme, but never lines up with it.This section creates a lot of emotional tension

and concludes in an expressive statement of the theme by the soloist in measure 423 .Afterwards,

there is a transition (431-463) from the B theme to the finale of the entire piece .This transition

uses very few motives from the main sections and relies more on reusing the material derived

from the developments and previous transitions.

Figure 3.8

The finale of this piece (measures 464-492) is an augmented statement of the A section .

In this section, there is very little countrapuntal writing.The texture is homophonic, and

Pakhmutova relies heavily on the ability of the soloist to project over the entire orchestra (when

performed with one) for a lengthy period of time.There is incredibly little dynamic contrast until

the final 5 measures where there is a subito piano followed by a rapid crescendo .This piece ends


23/38

22

with a definative cadence on the tonic of the piece (Eb minor) andwith the plethora of

terminative material in the last 6 measuresleaves the listener with little doubt that the piece has

ended.

Performance/Interpretive Challenges.The first, and perhaps the most prominent,

performance issue is the length of the concerto.In its entirety, Pakhmutovas Concertois

between 15 and 20 minutes long.For a brass player, this is a concern due to the stamina of the

player.The only way to work around this issue is to routinely do physical exercises during

practice, starting several months before the recital.Another concern is the physical and

psychological demand of the piece.The beginning of the Concertois marked ppp in the lowest

register of the instrument.While this is not physically demanding, the psychological impact on a

player is quite apparent.Trumpet players typically are known for high and loud playingit is

the quintessential trait of the lead player mentality.To open a piece with the opposite style of

playing (low and soft) puts the performer in an uncomfortable state.Often, this state of mind can

impact the entire performance.Since Pakhmutova intended the piece to be an academic solo

(therefore displaying traits common to the trumpet) Dokshitzer asked Pakhmutova to rewrite the

beginning and ending of the piece.

In the 1978 version of the piece, the trumpet begins up a perfect fifth from the original

and there is also a significant change in the texture.The original opens with just a timpani solo,

but the 1978 version opens with the whole string section playing above the staff.The trumpet

solo is also written at a louder dynamic.Adding these plays and bringing up the dynamic alters

the state of mind for the performer.It allows him or her to feel more comfortable at the


24/38

23

beginning of the piece which can lead to a better performance overall .Dokshitzer also asked

Pakhmutova to rewrite the ending, but for the opposite reason.The ending of the original version

ends with a particularly long halftime section in the upper register.This is very physically

demanding and takes a lot out of the performer.The reason for the rewrite is to add more

rhythmic elements to the piece to ease the physical demands and put the performer in a more

relaxed state of mind.

Other performance issues in this piece include multiple tonguing, exotic scales, and

register shifts.As discussed previously, there are several ways to approach multiple tonguing,

and this piece as numerous sections that make use of this technique .Due to Pakhmutovas

heritage, she is also quite prone to using exotic scales .For a classically trained musician who is

used to playing only diatonic scales, the frequent use of exotic scales can be difficult .Finally, the

register shifts (usually form the upper register to the lower register) can cause problems with

responsiveness of the lips.

Eric Ewazen: Sonata for Trumpet, mvt.II

Historical Context.Born in Cleveland, OH in 1954, Eric Ewazen is well known for his

orchestral, chamber, and solo compositions.Ewazen studied at the Eastman School of Music as

well as the Juilliard School; some of his teachers include Milton Babbitt, Samuel Adler, Warren

Benson, and Joseph Schwantner.Ewazen has been a faculty member at the Juilliard School since

1980.His Sonata for Trumpetwas commissioned by the International Trumpet Guild in 1993.

The piece was finished in time for the 1995 ITG Conference at Indiana University where it was


25/38

24

premiered.Throughout the pieces three movements, Ewazen actively avoided the avant-garde

techniques used in so many contemporary solos.Its melodic nature and lack of extended

techniques is the reason that it has gained recognition as a staple in the contemporary literature.14

The piece is very melodic with clear tonal centers and features a contrast between the first/third

movements and the second movement.Perhaps one of the most influential factors in the piece

was the collaboration with Ewazens friend Chris Gekker(trumpet professor at the University of

Maryland School of Music).15During the pieces composition, Ewazen sent selections to Gekker

for suggested changes, advice on how to proceed, etc.Gekker premiered the piece a few weeks

after its completion with Ewazen accompanying at the 1995 International Trumpet Guild

conference at Indiana University (Bloomington, Indiana).Since completing the Sonata, Ewazen

has written numerous works for both orchestra and wind ensemble.Ewazen is well known for

his chamber music and Neoromantic style. His music is available through the Hal Leonard

Corporation, the Lauren Keiser Music Publishing Company and the Theodore Presser Company.

Analysis.The Second Movement from Eric Ewazens Sonata for Trumpet and Pianois

an unusual example of the traditional Sonata Form.Pieces in Sonata Form follow the examples

that have been used for centuries and have three sections (Exposition, Development and

Recapitulation) that are driven by the key of the themes used; there may also be an introduction

and/or a coda.While these characteristics define the Sonata Form, composers make this standard

blueprint their own through a unique approach to development.Referencing Table 4, it is clear

14Eric Ewazen and Bruce Duffie, Composer Eric Ewazen in Conversation with Bruce Duffie(March 21, 1998).

15Ibid.


26/38

25

that this movement follows the standard form with the Exposition, Development, Recapitulation

and Coda.

Table 4Ewazen: Movement II

That which cannot be accurately shown in a table is Ewazens unique approach to development

which resides in his use of key structure and melodic/structural development.The piece begins at

the start of the exposition (without an introduction) and presents Theme Group I in the key of F#

majoralso written enharmonically as Gb major in some measures.This Theme Group consists

of two themes which will be referenced as Theme a (Figure 4.1) and Theme b (Figure 4.2).

139 #() ,

,

/

4565 C#() ,

66106 # ()

()

,/

106133 C 2/4 ,

(

,

)

134144 1 #() ,

144161 #() ,

161 C A B ,


27/38

26

Figure 4.1

Figure 4.2

These two themes are motivicly related, the second starting out as an inverted contour and

eventually sharing an augmented embellishment with Theme a.(The sixteenth notes in the third

bar of Theme b are an augmentation of the grace notes in the third bar of Theme a.) Theme a is

first presented in measures 1-14 provides the bulk of the easily-recognizable melodic material

throughout the movement.There is some transitional material in measures 14-22 which leads

into the appearance of Theme b.Theme b lasts through measures 22-35 and then returns to

Theme a for a short period (measures 35-39) before transitioning to Theme Group II .

Theme Group II is remarkably different than Theme Group I in both the writing of the

soloist and the accompanist.The solo line shifts from a lilting lullaby to a simpler, more forceful

melodic statement in Theme c (Figure 4.3).The accompaniment also makes a stylistic shift from

playing in a homophonic (block chords) texture to a texture that uses figuration to imply

harmony and add non-chord tones.

Figure 4.3


28/38

27

Theme c is in the key of C# minor (enharmonically, Db minor) and runs through measures 45-

54.In measure 54, Theme d enters.This Theme (Figure 4.4) is more similar to the style of those

in Theme Group I, but makes use of different rhythmic motives.This Theme Group ends with a

short restatement of Theme a (measures 62-65) and transitions to the development in measure

66.

Figure 4.4

The Development of this piece is where Ewazen begins to vary from the established

characteristics of a Sonata.Commonly, the Development is marked by a tonal instability caused

by adding various chromatic shifts or modulations/tonicizations.While Ewazen does utilize

some of these tools, his main focus is on creating instability of style .He begins the Development

by altering Theme A and changing its style from a gently rocking lullaby to a mysterious melody

that builds suspense to a release that uses Theme B.This section (measures 62-81) also

introduces a few meter changes and hemiolas that add to the instability.The next portion of the

Development (measures 81-105) returns to the style of the Exposition, but adds a lot of melodic

alterations.The solo line in measure 86 implies the same melodic idea as Theme a, but there are

several added notes which embellish the theme and make it less recognizable.

The second portion of the Development puts Theme Group II in a different meter2/4.

This second is very interesting because Ewazen completely averts the expectation of the listener.

Not only is the rhythmic feel of the piece totally different here, but it also changes the melodic

line so much that it is almost unrecognizable as Theme Group II .However, the melodic contour,


29/38

28

primary notes, and rhythmic figures give away this section as the Development of Theme Group

II.

The Recapitulation of this piece also differs from the typical example of Sonata Form.

Most Recapitulations have full restatements of both Theme Groups.However, this

Recapitulation only uses the first themes of each Theme Group.The Recapitulation begins in

measure 134 with Theme A and moves directly to Theme C in 144.The key factor in any Sonata

Form is the tonal reconciliation of Theme Group II, and this movement is no different .In

measure 144, Theme Group II is put in F#(Gb) which is the tonic of the piece .This Theme

Group is stated in full (measures 144-160).

An unusual aspect of this form is the coda.Typically, this section is used to bring the

piece to a close and provide terminative material.It is standard to have this section in the tonic

key (to further establish finality).However, Ewazen did not end this movement on the tonic (F#),

but rather on the super tonic (Ab).Though there is a sense of finality through the full statement

of Theme A, there is almost a need for more material due to the fact that the piece does not end

on the tonic.The reasoning for the piece not ending on the tonic can be attributed to its

placement within the whole piece.Since there is another movement remaining in the work, it

makes sense to avoid an absolute conclusion until the end of the Sonata.

Performance/Interpretive Challenges.Throughout the piece, there are several musical

choices that the performer must make.The most universal decision that must be made is how

quickly to perform the piece.The movement is marked at the pulse equaling 48 bpm.The


30/38

29

impression is that there should be a relatively tame quality to the piece; it should not have an

overbearing sense of forward motion.To further add to this idea, the tempo is being dropped to

roughly 42 bpm for this recital.Secondly, there are numerous grace notes throughout the piece.

It is the duty of the performer to unify them throughout the various sections in which they

appear.The grace notes must be unified in terms of their length, dynamic, and direction .The

final challenges presented by this piece are all technical challenges. A characteristic shared by all

of Ewazens brass music is that while it is beautifully lyrical, it almost always creates awkward

cross-fingerings, difficult tuning issues, and choppy leaps. Perhaps the greatest example of all

traits combined is in measures 150-152 (Figure 4.5). This passage requires not only great agility,

but an impeccable sense of pitch center to play musically, particularly with the choice of key.

Figure 4.5

Giacomo Puccini: Nessun dorma from Turandot

Historical Context.In the early 20thCentury, one of the most famous composers in all of

Europe was the Italian Giacomo Puccini.Called the greatest composer of Italian Opera since

Verdi, Puccini gained fame by setting music to the everyday life of the middle and lower

class.16This style of opera was known as verismoand rejected the lofty characters typically

assoiated with opera.Puccini was born in Italy in 1858 to a highly musical family.He received

musical eduaction from his uncle, Fortunato Magi, after his fathers death in 1864.Puccini began

16William Weaver, Puccini: the Man and his Music(New York: Sequoia-Elsevier Publishing Company, 1977).


31/38

30

writing orchestral music, but it was suggested to him by Amilcare Ponchielli that he begin

writing operas; Puccini did extactly that and composed his first opera,Le Ville.As his musical

career developed, Puccini composed several operas includingLa Bohme,Madama Butterfly,

and (his first step into the verismostyle) Tosca.After these three great successes, Puccini began

to compose less frequently, finally ending his career with his final opera, Turandot.17Puccini

never finished the opera due to health problems concerned with his throat cancer.He died in

1924 after complications from a surgery and Turandot was finished by Franco Alfano.

Turandothas gained international fame in its entirety, but perhaps the most well-known

part of the opera is the aria Nessun dorma. Sung by the operas protagonist, the Unknown

Prince, its impressive vocal demand combined with its beautiful orchestration caused this aria to

stand out against all other Italian arias.18Perhaps the defining performance that helped the aria

achieve pop status was the 1972 performance by world renown tenor, Luciano Pavarotti.

Though Pavarotti rarely sang the aria with context of the whole opera, it nevertheless became his

signature closing number at almost all of his solo appearances.Nessun dorma is from the final

act of Turandotand is symbolic of the external confilict occuring in the plot .In the previous act,

the Unknown Prince (Calaf)who has fallen in love with the beautiful princess Turandot

proved himself worthy of marrying her.The challenge he passed was correctly answering three

riddles; had he not, he would have been beheaded.However, despite answering her riddles

correctly, Turandot still refuses to marry him.In response, the Unknown Prince gives Turandot a

challenge: if she can guess his name by dawn, she would not have to marry him and could

17John Louis DiGaetani, Puccini the Thinker(New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., 1987).

18Weaver.


32/38

31

behead him.The princess then orders here subjects to not sleep until they discover his name, lest

they all be beheaded themselves.The final act opens with the Unknown Prince alone in a

moonlit garden, commenting on the princesss actions.

Nessun dorma19

Nessun dorma! Nessun dorma!

Tu pure, o, Principessa,

nella tua fredda stanza,

guardi le stelle

che tremano d'amore

e di speranza.Ma il mio mistero chiuso in me,

il nome mio nessun sapr!No, no, sulla tua bocca lo dir

quando la luce splender!

Ed il mio bacio scioglier il silenzio

che ti fa mia!

(Il nome suo nessun sapr!...e noi dovrem, ahime, morir!)

Dilegua, o notte!

Tramontate, stelle!

Tramontate, stelle!All'alba vincer!

vincer, vincer!

None shall sleep! None shall sleep!

Even you, o Princess,in your cold room,

watch the stars,

that tremble with love

and with hope.But my secret is hidden within me,

my name no one shall know...No! No! On your mouth I will tell it

when the light shines.And my kiss will dissolve the silence

that makes you mine!

(No one will know his name

and we must, alas, die.)

Vanish, o night!

Set, stars!

Set, stars!At dawn, I will win!I will win! I will win!

Analysis.The form of Puccinis Nessun dorma is determined not by the musical

themes, but by the subject matter of the text.Puccinis melodic writing actually follows very

closely the vocal inflection that would be used if the text was read .Formally, this piece is

through composed, but uses and reuses basic thematic material for compositional unity (Table

5).In the original aria, there are actually four main sections: the Statement, the Secret, the Fantsy

19Ibid.


33/38

32

and the Command.This version of the aria keeps those four sections and adds a coda section for

a more conclusive ending.

Table 5Puccini

111 (A)

1218 (B) B,

1924 (A) ,

2538 C (B) C

The first section (measures 1 to 11) is a statement by the main character (Calaf, AKA the

Unknown Prince) about the feelings of Turandot and the discomfort she cast upon her subjects .

The melodic writing (Figure 5.1) is very simple, and its consistantly descending countour

matches the vocal inflection that would be used in a converstational statement.Interestingly, this

section displays very little harmonic progression.The majority of the accopmaniment is an

arrpegiated G-major chord with an added second (Figure 5.2).However, on the fourth beat of

each measure (excluding measures 5 and 11), Puccini writes a half-dimished four chord with an

added ninth (see Figure 5.2). This type of harmonic writing creates a very stagnant feeling in the

listener.Its function is, through contrast, to create an even greater sense of progression and

arrival during the climactic section.

Figure 5.1


34/38

33

Figure 5.2

This section seamlessly gives way to the next section, the Secret.At this point (measures

12 to 15), Calaf brags that he has a secret that will garuntee him the hand of the princesshis

name.Again, Puccini expertly matches the natural vocal inflection of the text (Figure 5.3) and

begins to write with more variety in the harmonic scheme.This first high point of the aria is in

this section and is symbolic of Calafs excitement at the idea of marrying the beautiful woman.

Figure 5.3

The Fantasy section (measures 22 to 24) is slightly based on the melodic writing of the

first section, though it is much shorter andbased on the melodic contour and its implications of

vocal inflectionshows that the character is much more excited (Figure 5.4).This short section

leads up to the Command section (measures 25 to 37) of the aria, which is based on the same

thematic material as the Secret section (Figure 5.3).Certainly the largest section of this piece,

the writing in this section gives off an aura of assured confidence and is, for this reason, the most


35/38

34

important section of the aria.All of the sections before the Command are, as one might expect,

strategically leading up to the big moment in measure 34 (Figure 5 .5) The aria ends with a

broad statement of the main theme from the entire opera, performed not only by the piano

accompanist, but also a choir of off-stage brass players.

Figure 5.4

Figure 5.5

Performance/Interpretive Challenges.As with any vocal piece, the text must be taken

into consideration.The text determines the phrasing, emphasis and overall mood of the

performance; it cannot be ignored.Additionally, this piece was performed memorized because it

allows the performer to engage the audience as an actor would do.It also allows for a more

organic quality to the performance.The instrumental arrangement of this piece was completed

by the performer and features not only extended transitions, but an off-stage choir of brass

players (2 trumpets, 4 French horns).The choir was added to convey the effect of the off-stage

voices Puccini used in the original version.Additionally, it serves a programmatic purpose.

Since the piece is being played at the end of the recital, the change in timbre from solo trumpet


36/38

35

with piano to full brass choir adds a new dimension to the finality of the piece .It was intended to

leave the audience feeling uplifted and musically satisfied.

Conclusion

This recital features a wide variety of pieces, ranging from lush vocal arrangements to

contemporary instrumental solos.However, there is a unifying theme present in each piece that

connects the selections in the recital like a golden thread would connect a string of pearls

beauty.In each piece, there is a moment of impeccable, undeniable beauty.Be it a painful,

morose plea or a joyful shout to finally kiss your true love, there is a moment in each piece that

can touch the hearts of the audience and in some wayregardless of how smallchange their

life.Though the purpose of this recital is to culminate four years study in music, the intent of

the performance is to provide the audience with a rich aesthetic experience and change the life of

at least one person who hears it


37/38

36

Bibliography

Carner, Mosco. Puccini: A Critical Biography. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers, Inc.,

1974.

Cook, Holly. Alexandra Pakhmutova's Concerto for Trumpet and Orchestra. PhD LectureRecital, Los Angelos, CA: University of Southern California (Thornton School of

Music), 2012.

DiGaetani, John Louis. Puccini the Thinker. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., 1987.

Ewazen, Eric, interview by Bruce Duffie. Composer Eric Ewazen in Conversation with Bruce

Duffie (March 21, 1998).

Ewazen, Eric. The Music of Eric Ewazen. 2014. http://www.ericewazen.com/about.php

(accessed September 10, 2014).

"Georges Enesco." Musical Times, 1955: 327.

Jablonski, Edward. Gershwin. New York: Doubleday, 1987.

Juslin, Patrick N., and John A. Sloboda. Music and Emotion: Thoery and Research. New York:

Oxford University Press, 2001.

Kosztandi, Istvan. The Great Romanian Composer and Master of the Violin, George Enescu, the

Creative and Virtuoso Violinist. Doctoral Thesis, Budapest: Liszt Ferenc Academy of

Muisc, 2013.

Malcolm, Noel. George Enescu. Toccata Press, 1990.

McNally, Joseph Daniel. A Performer's Analysis of Eric Ewazen's Sonata for Trumpet and

Piano. Ann Arbor, MI, 2008.

Pakhmutova, Alexandra. Pakhmutova. 1997-2014. http://www.pakhmutova.ru/bio.shtml

(accessed September 11, 2014).

Palisca, Claude V. Music and Ideas. Chicago: Unievrsity of Illinois Press, 2006.

Schwartz, Charles. Gershwin: His Life And Music. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company,

Inc., 1973.

Sienkiewicz, F. A. (2005).Research in Performance: Analysis of Five Trumpet Works.Boston,

MA: University of Massachusetts.

Somville, Pierre. "La personnalite artistique de Georges Enesco." Revue Philosophique de la

France et de l'Etranger, 1979: 471.


38/38

Weaver, William. Puccini: the Man and his Music. New York: Sequoia-Elsevier Publishing

Company, 1977.

Weaver, William, and Simonetta Puccini. The Puccini Companion. New York: W. W. Norton &

Co., 1994.

cody ortz capstone 2014

Documents