cindy millikin, phd director of results driven accountability dan d. jorgensen

13
Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen Evaluation & Research Coordinator From Accountability to Achievement: “The Data Dive” 2012 Fall Special Education Directors’ Meeting

Upload: leo-wilson

Post on 03-Jan-2016

47 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

From Accountability to Achievement: “The Data Dive” 2012 Fall Special Education Directors’ Meeting. Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen Evaluation & Research Coordinator. Purpose. Data Pipeline Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

C i n d y M i l l i k i n , P h DD i r e c t o r o f Re s u l t s D r i ve n A c co u n ta b i l i t y

D a n D. J o rg e n s e nEva l u a ti o n & R e s e a rc h C o o rd i n a t o r

From Accountability to Achievement: “The Data Dive”

2012 Fall Special Education Directors’ Meeting

Page 2: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

Data Pipeline Update

Overview of Data Collections, Data Tools & Reports

Future Trainings and Resources

Data Audit Form & Activity

Open Dialogue

Purpose

Page 3: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

Series of Interchanges

Authoritati ve source

From “collecti ons” to “snapshots”

Data Store

ESSU Data Management System and the IEP Interchange Validations – Level 1 edits Duplicate SASIDs

Data Pipeline

Page 4: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

Histor ica l ly, data has been col lec ted to suppor t accountabi l i ty dec is ions. Today, the data cont inues to suppor t th is work ; however, an increased emphasis on achievement outcomes now ex is ts .

“Core” Data Col lec t ions/Snapshots inc lude: Special Education End of Year Special Education Discipline Special Education Child Count (December 1 Count) Special Education Personnel Collection (HR Collection – December 1 Staff)

Other Data Sources: Parent Survey (Indicator 8) Indicator 13 f i le reviews Student Outcome survey (Indicator 14) TCAP/CO Alt results and AMO decisions (Indicator 3) Results Matter (Indicator 7) Dispute Resolution (Indicator 16-19) Monitoring (Indicator 15) Data Submissions (Indicator 20)

Data Submissions

Page 5: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

Data from TCAP 2012 Reading Writing Math

Trends

Does not include the results of students from eligible faciliti es or Co-Alt

2012 TCAP Results by Disability

Page 6: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

Data Reports

Special Education Data Reports: http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdespedfin/SPED_DataReports.htm

Available Reports:

•Students served by Disability•Students served by Grade level•Students served by Race/Ethnicity•Students served by Gender•Students served by Setting•Students Served by Age Group•Students Compared to October Count

Page 7: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

Rt I Implementati on Rubr ics : District Level School Level Classroom Level htt p://www.cde.state.co.us/RtI/

Disc ip l ine Referra l /Suspens ions” PBIS SWIS System htt p://www.cde.state.co.us/pbis/

SchoolView TCAP Status/Growth SPF/DPF Frameworks htt p://www.schoolview.org /

Distr i c t/Schoo l Reports Membership Graduati on/Dropout Rates htt p://www.cde.state.co.us/index_stats.htm

Other Sources of Data

Page 8: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

What is the disaggregated status of our populati ons per subject matt er? Reading? Math? Writi ng?

Achievement? Profi cient and Advanced? Growth?

What are the trends with these populati ons over the last 3-5 years?

Where are students showing accelerated growth?

How do these results compare to students without disabiliti es?

Where are the most signifi cant gaps?

Sample Questions to Ask

Page 9: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

Fidelity & Achievement: RtI

For s i tes , at the h ighest leve l o f implementati on ( i .e . opti miz ing) across components on the Rt I rubr ic , l i teracy scores were substanti al ly h igher then other schoo ls w i th lower leve ls o f fi de l i ty o f implementati on.

The rubr ic ser ves as an eff ecti ve too l to gauge successfu l R t I implementati on and to improve program des ign at the c lassroom, schoo l , and d ist r i c t leve l s .

Page 10: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

For e lementary and middle schools , roughly a three to fi ve po int ga in on the PB IS fi del i ty measure (BoQ ) predicts a 1% increase in math and reading profi c iency scores on the CSAP.

The relati onship between fi delity scores and math achievement is stronger than that observed for reading.

The PBIS fi delity of implementati on tools (i.e. the SET and BoQ) serve as eff ecti ve tools to gauge successful RtI implementati on and to improve program design at the classroom, school, and district levels.

Fidelity & Achievement: PBIS

Page 11: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

Upcoming Trainings & Resources:

MTSS Problem-Solving Training

PBIS Leadership Academy Topics: Role of Leadership, Disproporti onality and Discipline (Indicator 4),

alternati ves to suspension, legislati ve updates. htt p://www.cde.state.co.us/scripts/calendarpbs/eventdetail.asp?event=230

Unified Improvement Plan Training Address different steps in the UIP planning process. htt p://www.cde.state.co.us/uip/UIP_TrainingAndSupport_Register.asp

ESSU web-page: htt p://www.cde.state.co.us/cdespedfin/Index_SEFD.htm

Additional Resources

Page 12: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

The Audit Tool is a simple form that clarifies the data available to sites and ties that data back to the UIP goal.

The form identifies: Data Source Purpose (fidelity or outcome) Frequency of Collection Frequency of Review Who has access? Which team reviews? Relation to UIP Goal Intended Outcomes

Data Audit Tool

Page 13: Cindy Millikin, PhD Director of Results Driven Accountability Dan D. Jorgensen

Please record your thoughts. Please be prepared to share your thoughts with the larger group.

How may the Exceptional Student Service Unit better support the needs of your AU/site/district(s)?

What data, analysis, and/or reports would best support your work?

What addit ional supports may CDE be able to provide you to facil i tate improved academic achievement for students with disabil it ies?

Open Dialogue