child poverty in nottingham, july 2013

8/14/2019 Child Poverty in Nottingham, July 2013

1/20

1

Child Poverty inNottingham,

2013

Note produced by Policy and Research TeamNottingham City CouncilAugust 2013


2/20

2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The extent of child poverty in Nottingham Nottingham City has a high level of child poverty, regardless of the definition used.

Two thirds of City children live in families that receive financial support from theGovernment, either because nobody in the household works or those who are inwork earn a low income. This is significantly higher than the England average.

Worklessness affects slightly more children in Nottingham than low income.

42,000 Nottingham City children live in families where no adults work or where thehousehold income is low. This is equivalent to 67% of children compared to rates of50% in Greater Nottingham and 45% in England.

21,200 (34%) of City children live in families where parents are claiming worklessbenefits, such as Jobseekers Allowance, Incapacity Benefit and Lone Parent Income

Support. A further 20,900 (33%) live in families where the annual income is sufficiently low to

warrant financial support in the form of Child Tax Credit and Working Tax Credit typically less than 17,000.

The majority of Greater Nottingham children living in workless or low income families,reside within the City.

There has been a decrease in the number of children in low income families and anincrease in the number in workless families in Greater Nottingham between 2010/11and 2011/12, reversing the changes seen the previous year.

Workless poverty is more geographically concentrated than in-work poverty. In oneCity ward and a number of City Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs), more than 50%of children live in workless families.


3/20

3

Introduction

This note is an update to previous Child Poverty Notes which can be found onwww.nottinghaminsight.org.uk or accessed by clicking here.

1 MEASURES OF CHILD POVERTY

The official definitionof child poverty is the number of dependent children who live inhouseholds whose equivalised income1 is below 60% of the contemporary nationalmedian. Data to measure this at a national level are collected through the annual FamilyResources Survey, but the sample size is not large enough to give robust results at localauthority level.

In the absence of local level data, previous Child Poverty Notes have used HMRC taxcredit data to indicate the finalised annual number of children who live in families whereno adult works, or where the family income is sufficiently low to warrant financial supportin the form of working tax credit2. This includes children in families claiming tax creditswith an income above 60% of the median and will include some families who have arelatively good income and are therefore only eligible for the childcare elements ofworking tax credits. This measure was chosen because, although some families with anincome above 60% of the median may not be in poverty, a greater proportion will havea relatively low income, and some may be at risk of falling into poverty. In this note, thisdata is discussed in section 2 and is referred to as the Nottingham City Councildefined local child poverty measure.

Recently however, the Child Poverty Unit have published new data which gives asnapshot of the number of children who live in families in receipt of out of work means-tested benefits and those in families in receipt of tax credits where their reported incomeis less than 60% median income3. The Children in Low-Income Families LocalMeasure, formerly known as the NI116 proxy measure is closer to the official definitionof child poverty, although it is still derived using administrative data rather than surveydata. The measure is narrower than the Nottingham City Council defined localmeasure, which includes children in families claiming tax credits with an income above60% of the median. In this note, this data is discussed in section 3and is referred to asthe national proxy child poverty measure.

For more detail on definitions and data sources, please see appendix A.

1Equivalised income is a measure of household income that takes account of the differences in a

household's size and composition making it equivalent for all household sizes and compositions.

2As entitlement to tax credits can change throughout the year as families circumstances change, this data

is a complete retrospective picture for the year, based on a finalised view of family incomes andcircumstances.

3This data is a snapshot of the caseload at a particular point in time (31

stAugust), rather than the complete

retrospective picture for the year, based on a finalised view of family incomes and circumstances.


4/20

4

2 THE NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL DEFINED LOCAL CHILDPOVERTY MEASURE

2.1 The extent of child poverty in Nottingham

Over 42,000 Nottingham City children live in families where no adults work or where thehousehold income is low. This is equivalent to 67% of all children4. 21,200 or 34% of allchildren live in workless families. A further 20,900 (33%) live in families with lowincomes.Nottingham Citys neighbouring authorities have much lower rates, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Children in workless and low income families, 2011-12

Children

WorklessNo.

LowIncome

No. Total No.Workless

%

LowIncome

%Total

%

Nottingham City 21,200 20,900 42,100 33.8 33.3 67.1Broxtowe 3,300 4,400 7,700 15.7 20.9 36.6Gedling 3,700 5,600 9,300 16.1 24.4 40.5

Rushcliffe 1,800 3,700 5,500 7.8 16.1 23.9

GreaterNottingham* 30,000 34,600 64,600 23.1 26.7 49.8% In City 70.7 60.4 64.9

East Midlands 179,400 251,500 430,900 18.4 25.8 44.3England 2,290,200 2,864,500 5,154,700 19.9 24.8 44.7

Source: HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Statistics, Finalised Awards 2011/12. * Excludes Hucknall.

Table 2 shows the number of familieswith children in relative poverty. There are 11,000workless families a small increase on last year, and 11,800 families with low incomes

a decrease of 500 on last year. There are just under 36,000 workless or low incomefamilies in Greater Nottingham.

4The number of children is taken from Child Benefit Records. Please note this differs to previous child

poverty notes which use the mid year estimates of population aged 0-18 as a denominator. See Appendix Afor more information.


5/20

5

Table 2 Workless and low income families, 2011-12

Families

WorklessNo.

LowIncome

No. Total No.

Nottingham City 11,000 11,800 22,800

Broxtowe 1,800 2,700 4,500

Gedling 2,000 3,300 5,300

Rushcliffe 1,000 2,200 3,200GreaterNottingham* 15,800 20,000 35,800

% In City 69.6 59.0 63.7

East Midlands 93,800 142,600 236,400

England 1,198,800 1,591,800 2,790,600Source: HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Statistics, Finalised Awards 2011/12. * Excludes Hucknall.

2.2 Child poverty trends

Tax credit data has been published for the last few years which allows analysis ofchanges over time. It is important to note however, that the data is influenced by take uprates, so the trends in the following tables should be treated with caution.

The number of children in workless families increased in all the districts of Greater

Nottingham except Rushcliffe, between 2010-11 and 2011-12. The number in lowincome families decreased. This is the reverse of what happened in the previous year.

Table 3 Children in workless and low income families, 2010-11 to 2011-12

Children in Workless FamiliesChildren in Low Income

Families

2010-11No.

2011-12No.

Change(%)

2010-11No.

2011-12No.

Change(%)

Nottingham City 21,000 21,200 1.0% 21,800 20,900 -4.1

Broxtowe 3,200 3,300 3.1% 4,600 4,400 -4.3

Gedling 3,600 3,700 2.8% 6,000 5,600 -6.7Rushcliffe 1,900 1,800 -5.3% 3,800 3,700 -2.6GreaterNottingham* 29,700 30,000 1.0% 36,200 34,600 -4.4

% In City 70.7 70.7 60.2 60.4

East Midlands 181,100 179,400 -0.9% 262,400 251,500 -4.2England 2,340,400 2,290,200 -2.1% 2,938,000 2,864,500 -2.5

Source: HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Statistics, Finalised Awards 2010/11 and 2011/12. GreaterNottingham excludes Hucknall.

Table 4 shows the number and percentage of children in workless and low incomefamilies for Nottingham City since 2005/6. Please note that all percentages have


6/20

6

been calculated using the number of children from child benefit records as adenominator this is different to child poverty notes prior to 2012, so percentagesmay differ from those previously published.

The number of children in workless families increased by 200 in 2011/12, and thenumber in low income families decreased by 900, meaning the total percentage is at itslowest since 2007/8.Although the total number of children in workless and low income families is above the2008/9 figure, the percentage has decreased every year since 2008/9, due to a rise inthe number of children in the City.

Table 4 Children in workless and low income families, Nottingham City

Workless Low Income Total

Number % Number % Number %

2005/6 20,300 34.7 17,570 30.0 37,870 64.62006/7 20,200 34.1 18,230 30.8 38,430 64.92007/8 19,960 34.0 19,230 32.8 39,190 66.82008/9 21,030 35.4 20,390 34.3 41,420 69.72009/10 21,300 34.7 21,100 34.4 42,400 69.2

2010/11 21,000 33.8 21,800 35.1 42,800 68.8

2011/12 21,200 33.8 20,900 33.3 42,100 67.1Source: HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Statistics, Finalised Awards

2.3 The spatial distribution of child poverty

The HM Revenue and Customs extract of CTC and WTC data at Lower Super OutputLevel (LSOA) as at August 2011 can be used to estimate ward rates, and to indicate thepattern of child poverty across Greater Nottingham.

In three wards in Nottingham City (Arboretum, St Anns, and Aspley) at least four in fivechildren live in either workless families or families with relatively low incomes. Eight otherCity wards have rates in excess of 70%.

Aspley has the highest number of children affected. At over 5,000, this is 1,800 greaterthan the ward with the next highest number (Bulwell). All bar one City ward and tenwards outside Nottingham City have rates in excess of 50%. Of the non City wards, the

largest percentage is Killisick (Arnold) at 66.7%.


7/20

7

Table 5 Wards with the highest rates of children in workless or low incomefamilies, August 2011

Rank byrate Ward Rate %

ChildrenNo.

1 Arboretum 85.3 1,535

2 St. Ann's 81.6 2,745

3 Aspley 81.3 5,180

4 Bridge 77.2 1,825

5 Bulwell 74.0 3,300Source: HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Statistics, Small Area Analysis.

Please see Appendix B for rankings of all wards in Greater Nottingham.

Map 1 below shows the proportion of children living in either workless families or familieswith relatively low incomes by LSOA. The most income deprived areas are concentratedwithin Nottingham City.

Map 1 below indicates high proportions in Aspley, Bulwell and the inner city areas of theMeadows, Radford, St. Anns and Sneinton. The map also shows pockets in Clifton,Bilborough, and Bestwood.


8/20

8


9/20

9

2.4 The spatial distribution of children in workless families

Table 6 gives the wards with the highest rate of children living in workless families. Aspley has both the highest rate and the highest number. There are a further seven Citywards where more than 1,000 children live in out-of-work families.

Just one ward outside of the City has a rate of more than 35% - Killisick in Arnold.

Table 6 Wards with the highest rates of children in workless families, August 2011


ChildrenNo.

1 Aspley 50.2 3,200

2 St. Ann's 45.2 1,520

3 Bulwell 42.6 1,900

4 Arboretum 42.5 765

5 Bilborough 40.9 1,800Source: HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Statistics, Small Area Analysis

Map 2 below shows that the LSOAs with the highest rates primarily lie within theNottingham City boundary. There are high rates in Bells Lane, Broxtowe Estate, Bulwell,St. Anns and Sneinton. There are also pockets in the Meadows, Radford, andBestwood.


10/20

10


11/20

11

2.5 The spatial distribution of children in low income families

Table 7 gives the wards with the highest rate of children living in low income families. InLeen Valley, Arboretum and Berridge wards, more than 40% of children live in lowincome families. Seven other City have rates in excess of a third.

Table 7 Wards with the highest rates of children living in low income families,August 2011


ChildrenNo.

1 Leen Valley 43.4 1,095


3 Berridge 42.3 1,795

4 Bridge 38.9 920

5 Dales 38.7 1,520Source: HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit Statistics, Small Area Analysis.

Map 3 below shows that the highest concentrations for children living in low incomefamilies, are mainly in parts of Sneinton, Radford and Hyson Green, the Meadows andthe south of Clifton.


12/20

12


13/20

13

3 THE NATIONAL PROXY CHILD POVERTY MEASURE

3.1 The extent of child poverty in Nottingham

Please note that the figures below differ to those in Section 2, as figures reported insection 2 include children living in families with income above the 60% median. Inaddition, the figures reported in section 2 are finalised data (over a whole year) ratherthan a snapshot at a point in time. See page 3 for further explanation.

The national proxy child poverty measure shows that, at August 2011 over 18,000 Citychildren were living in families claiming workless benefits; 1,200 were in families whoworked but had incomes less than 60% of the medianand a further 2,300 who claimedchild tax credit only, but had an income less than 60% of the median (the latter figure willinclude people ineligible for working tax credit for various reasons.) The total of 21,600

equates to 34.4% of City children.

Table 8 Children in families with income less than 60% of median, August 2011

Number of Children

Workless

WorkingTax Credit

and earningless than

60% median

Child TaxCredit only

with incomeless than

60% median Total Total %

Nottingham City 18,120 1,195 2,285 21,600 34.4Broxtowe 2,495 165 465 3,140 14.9

Gedling 2,805 210 495 3,560 15.5

Rushcliffe 1,240 210 325 1,740 7.6

GreaterNottingham* 24,660 1,780 3,570 30,040 23.0

% In City 73% 67% 64% 72%

East Midlands 140,510 13,830 24,905 179,245 18.4

England 1,875,090 180,505 313,855 2,319,450 20.1

Source: HMRC Revised local child poverty measure, August 2011

3.2 Child poverty trends

The number of children living in families with an income less than 60% of the medianstayed fairly static in all Greater Nottingham areas between 2010 and 2011, except inRushcliffe which saw a decrease greater than the regional and national average.

It is worth noting however, that, as the figures show relativepoverty, the number fallingbelow the poverty threshold will be affected by changes to the median income. As themedian income has fallen over recent years, some families may no longer be inpoverty, but may have seen no actualchange to their incomes or living standards.


14/20

14

Table 9 Children in families with income less than 60% of median, 2010 to 2011

Children in poverty

2010 2011Change

(%)

Nottingham City 21,440 21,600 0.7

Broxtowe 3,115 3,140 0.8

Gedling 3,570 3,560 -0.3

Rushcliffe 1,805 1,740 -3.6

Greater Nottingham* 29,930 30,040 0.4

% In City 72% 72%

East Midlands 181,250 179,245 -1.1

England 2,367,330 2,319,450 -2.0

Source: HMRC Revised local child poverty measure, 2010 and 2011

3.3 The spatial distribution of child poverty

The national proxy child poverty data at Lower Super Output Level (LSOA) as at August2011 can be used to estimate ward rates, and to indicate the pattern of child povertyacross Greater Nottingham.

Table 10 Wards with the highest rates of children living in workless families orworking families with an income below 60% of median income, August 2011


ChildrenNo.

1 Aspley 50.3 3205

2 St. Ann's 45.8 1540


4 Bulwell 42.7 1905

5 Bilborough 40.5 1780

Source: HMRC Revised local child poverty measure, 2011

Map 4 shows the proportion of children living in either workless families or workingfamilies with an income below 60% of median income by LSOA. The most incomedeprived areas are concentrated within Nottingham City.

The map indicates high proportions in areas within Aspley, St Anns, Bulwell andRadford, and parts of Sneinton. The map also shows pockets in the Meadows,Bestwood, Bilborough, and Top Valley.


15/20

15


16/20

16

4 OTHER INDICATORS OF CHILD POVERTY

4.1 Claimant Unemployment trends

More up-to-date data to indicate worklessness is available in the form of Job SeekersAllowance claimant numbers from DWP. These show that in August 2013 there were12,651 unemployed people in Nottingham City, 5.9% of the working age population.Claimant numbers fell by over 200 between July and August and have now fallen for thesixth month in a row.

In the wider Greater Nottingham Area, there were 18,790 people unemployed (4.1%) inAugust 2013. The City has less than half of Greater Nottinghams working agepopulation, but accounts for two thirds of the areas unemployment.

4.2 Consultation on Child Poverty

In late 2012, the Government launched a consultation on improving the measure of childpoverty - how to best reflect the reality of child poverty using a multi-dimensionalmeasure. The consultation asked for views on including a wider range of indicators, inaddition to income, in a measure of child poverty. The consultation closed on 15thFebruary 2013 and the Government have yet to publish the results. Whatever theresults, it seems likely be that child poverty measures change in the future, althoughwhether data will be available to allow monitoring at a local level is not yet known.


17/20

17

APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS AND DATA SOURCES

The number of children

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) publish the number of child benefit recipients on theHMRC website. Although these figures will not include children in families who may beeligible but not receiving child benefit for whatever reason, they give the best indicationof the number of children in an area, as Child Benefit is a universal benefit and not(currently) affected by family income.

Please note,previous Child Poverty notes, did not use child benefit recipients as adenominator for calculating Local Authority, East Midlands and England rates. Thenumber of children aged 0-18 was instead taken from the latest Mid Year Estimates ofpopulation from the Office of National Statistics.Similarly, previous Child Poverty notes did not use child benefit recipients as a

denominator for calculating Lower Super Output Areas (LSOA) and ward rates. Insteadthe number of children aged 0-18 was estimated by Nottingham City Council using theMid Year Estimates and the 2001 Census (as these figures are not available from theOffice of National Statistics).

Due to the different denominators used in this report, changes in rates fromprevious Child Poverty Notes should be treated with caution.

Nottingham City Council local child poverty measure (as used in previous ChildPoverty Notes)

HMRC Child and Working Tax Credit data is published annually on the HMRC website atwww.hmrc.gov.uk/statWorkless familiesHMRC analyse their administrative data and that of Department for Work and Pensions(DWP) to identify families receiving Child Tax Credit (CTC) in addition to key worklessbenefits. These include Jobseekers Allowance, Incapacity Benefit, Severe DisablementAllowance, Disability Living Allowance and Income Support. CTC is intended to supportfamilies with children, is paid in addition to Child Benefit, and is based on family size andhousehold income. In some cases an equivalent payment is made via benefits. Captureof disability and sickness benefit claimant family information relies on them havingapplied for CTC: no family information is recorded otherwise. Although the termsworkless and out-of-work have been used in this report for ease of narrative, some

families will be working a few hours a week. However, associated incomes will be verylow.Low income familiesIn this report the number of families with low incomes is defined as those in receipt ofboth CTC and Working Tax Credit (WTC). WTC was introduced to support families onlow incomes, but working at least 16 hours per week.The criteria for workless and low income are mutually exclusive, but in reality there willbe a degree of churn as families financial and household circumstances change. Bothsources give an average number of families and children for a given year.Total child poverty


18/20

18

In the Nottingham City Council defined measure, total child poverty is the sum ofchildren living in workless and low income families. Put another way, those children wholive in households where the Government has determined a need for financial support,

based on their circumstances. This is not the same as the official measure of childpoverty,as the data looks at allclaimants of CTC / WTC regardless of whether their totalincome is less than 60% of the median.

The data for local authorities and larger geographies are taken from the Child andWorking Tax Credit Statistics, Finalised Awards 2011-12. Figures are averages for theyear. Rates are unofficial and have been calculated using the number of child benefitrecipients from HMRC.

The data for wards and smaller geographies are taken from the Child and Working TaxCredit Statistics for Lower Super Output Areas. Figures are snapshots as at August2011. CTC claims are subject to seasonal variation and August is typically a higher than

average month. Ward and LSOA rates are unofficial and have been calculated usingnumbers of child benefit recipients at LSOA level from HMRC. Because of thelimitations of child benefit data mentioned above, and because claimant figures for smallareas are subject to rounding before release, rates should be treated as indicative only.

National proxy child poverty measure

For the past few years, HMRC have published a proxy child poverty measure (nowcalled the Children in Low-Income Families Local Measure, formerly the revised childpoverty measure or the NI116 measure) at LSOAs and Local Authority level. This givesthe proportion of children who live in families in receipt of out of work means-tested

benefits and those in families in receipt of tax credits where their reported income is lessthan 60% median income.

Child poverty by this definition is the sum of:

the number of children living in families in receipt of Income Support or Income-Based Jobseekers Allowance

the number of children living in families in receipt of both Child Tax Credit andWorking Tax Credit whose reported income is less than 60 per cent of medianincome;

the number of children living in families receiving Child Tax Credit only whosereported income is less than 60 per cent of median income;

The denominator for calculating rates is the total number of children in the areadetermined by Child Benefit data.


19/20

19

APPENDIX B: Nottingham City Council defined Child Povertymeasure - statistics by Ward, August 2011

Children in Families (no.) Children in Families (%.)

LA WardLow

IncomeOut ofWork Total

LowIncome

Out ofWork Total

Rankby %

Ashfield Hucknall Central 380 275 655 25.7 18.6 44.3 38

Hucknall East 485 525 1010 24.9 26.9 51.8 25

Hucknall North 325 305 630 22.3 20.9 43.2 41

Hucknall West 510 460 970 23.8 21.4 45.2 35

Broxtowe Attenborough 65 25 90 16.9 6.5 23.4 70

Awsworth 125 60 185 28.7 13.8 42.5 43

Beeston Central 140 125 265 26.2 23.4 49.5 30

Beeston North 250 275 525 23.9 26.3 50.2 29

Beeston Rylands 225 170 395 24.6 18.6 43.2 39

Beeston West 120 75 195 13.6 8.5 22.0 73Bramcote 140 85 225 11.0 6.7 17.7 85

Brinsley 105 60 165 25.9 14.8 40.7 46

Chilwell East 190 95 285 19.4 9.7 29.1 60

Chilwell West 365 360 725 21.7 21.4 43.2 40

Cossall and Kimberley 310 175 485 24.4 13.8 38.2 49

Eastwood North & Greasley 150 75 225 27.0 13.5 40.5 47

Eastwood South 475 555 1030 26.1 30.5 56.6 20

Greasley (Giltbrook & Newthorpe) 190 120 310 17.0 10.7 27.7 65

Nuthall East and Strelley 225 90 315 19.0 7.6 26.6 67

Nuthall West & Greasley 170 115 285 16.9 11.4 28.4 64

Stapleford North 285 270 555 27.8 26.3 54.1 24

Stapleford South East 230 175 405 21.9 16.7 38.6 48

Stapleford South West 385 235 620 31.7 19.3 51.0 28

Toton and Chilwell Meadows 230 120 350 12.5 6.5 19.0 80

Trowell 85 35 120 20.7 8.5 29.3 59

Gedling Bestwood Village 110 55 165 28.2 14.1 42.3 44

Bonington 435 320 755 29.6 21.8 51.4 26

Burton Joyce and Stoke Bardolph 80 30 110 11.8 4.4 16.2 88

Calverton 365 225 590 26.6 16.4 43.1 42

Carlton 385 235 620 28.0 17.1 45.1 36

Carlton Hill 475 230 705 30.6 14.8 45.5 34

Daybrook 290 315 605 27.2 29.6 56.8 19

Gedling 315 135 450 24.4 10.5 34.9 52

Killisick 205 255 460 29.7 37.0 66.7 13

Kingswell 195 135 330 20.7 14.4 35.1 51

Lambley 65 10 75 19.4 3.0 22.4 72

Mapperley Plains 300 145 445 22.1 10.7 32.8 53Netherfield and Colwick 465 455 920 28.1 27.5 55.6 21

Newstead 110 90 200 24.7 20.2 44.9 37

Phoenix 325 210 535 28.6 18.5 47.1 32

Porchester 265 110 375 19.3 8.0 27.3 66

Ravenshead 120 45 165 12.9 4.8 17.7 83

St. James 220 90 310 28.9 11.8 40.8 45

St. Marys 360 310 670 24.5 21.1 45.6 33

Valley 320 250 570 32.5 25.4 57.9 17

Woodborough 25 20 45 8.2 6.6 14.8 90

Woodthorpe 160 65 225 11.4 4.6 16.1 89


20/20

20

Children in Families (no.) Children in Families (%.)

LA WardLow

IncomeOut ofWork Total

LowIncome

Out ofWork Total

Rankby %

Nottingham Arboretum 770 765 1535 42.8 42.5 85.3 1Aspley 1980 3200 5180 31.1 50.2 81.3 3

Basford 1305 1315 2620 33.2 33.5 66.7 13

Berridge 1795 1240 3035 42.3 29.2 71.6 9

Bestwood 1355 1535 2890 32.9 37.3 70.1 11

Bilborough 1370 1800 3170 31.1 40.9 72.0 8

Bridge 920 905 1825 38.9 38.3 77.2 4

Bulwell 1400 1900 3300 31.4 42.6 74.0 5

Bulwell Forest 820 770 1590 28.0 26.3 54.4 23

Clifton North 660 645 1305 25.8 25.2 51.1 27

Clifton South 1130 930 2060 35.0 28.8 63.8 16

Dales 1520 1360 2880 38.7 34.6 73.3 6

Dunkirk and Lenton 220 210 430 36.1 34.4 70.5 10

Leen Valley 1095 590 1685 43.4 23.4 66.7 12

Mapperley 815 840 1655 28.4 29.3 57.8 18

Radford and Park 780 690 1470 38.6 34.2 72.8 7

Sherwood 870 790 1660 28.7 26.0 54.7 22

St. Ann's 1225 1520 2745 36.4 45.2 81.6 2

Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey 300 310 610 32.1 33.2 65.2 15

Wollaton West 650 280 930 21.2 9.1 30.3 57

Rushcliffe Abbey 135 60 195 12.3 5.5 17.7 84

Bingham East 140 50 190 14.9 5.3 20.2 77

Bingham West 285 145 430 25.2 12.8 38.1 50

Compton Acres 175 55 230 14.6 4.6 19.2 79

Cotgrave 465 295 760 29.0 18.4 47.4 31

Cranmer 65 20 85 18.3 5.6 23.9 68

Edwalton Village 125 110 235 15.2 13.4 28.7 62

Gamston 175 105 280 13.0 7.8 20.7 75Gotham 85 20 105 25.0 5.9 30.9 56

Keyworth North 20 5 25 7.4 1.9 9.3 95

Keyworth South 195 115 310 20.5 12.1 32.6 54

Lady Bay 110 45 155 9.0 3.7 12.7 91

Leake 275 125 400 19.6 8.9 28.5 63

Lutterell 140 70 210 19.3 9.7 29.0 61

Manvers 120 40 160 15.2 5.1 20.3 76

Melton 120 75 195 11.9 7.5 19.4 78

Musters 90 35 125 8.1 3.2 11.3 94

Nevile 30 15 45 8.2 4.1 12.3 92

Oak 65 20 85 14.4 4.4 18.9 81

Ruddington 290 135 425 20.0 9.3 29.3 58

Soar Valley 65 25 90 16.3 6.3 22.5 71

Stanford 60 25 85 12.1 5.1 17.2 86

Thoroton 60 20 80 13.6 4.5 18.2 82

Tollerton 40 20 60 11.1 5.6 16.7 87

Trent 195 100 295 20.9 10.7 31.6 55

Trent Bridge 75 55 130 12.1 8.9 21.0 74

Wiverton 115 50 165 16.4 7.1 23.6 69

Wolds 35 20 55 7.8 4.4 12.2 93

child poverty in nottingham, july 2013

Documents