chapter 4 and 5
DESCRIPTION
Chapter 4 and 5. International Classification of Financial Reporting International Harmonization of accounting. Classification aids in Describing, analyzing, and predicting the development of accounting systems Strategic planning and control decisions International systems integration. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Chapter 4 and 5
International Classification of Financial Reporting International Harmonization of accounting
Classification of Accounting and Reporting Systems
Classification aids in Describing, analyzing,
and predicting the development of accounting systems
Strategic planning and control decisions
International systems integration
The Challenge? Adapt past effective
techniques to meet the demands of the global market Must understand
international traditions and heritage
Purposes of International Classification
Describe and compare international systems Improved understanding of
Similarities and differences of systems Development of systems and potential for change Dominance of some systems over others
Assess issues of international harmonization Identify and solve problems
Purposes of International Classification
Developing countries will be informed of systems in other countries
Aid international accountants and auditors Problems with accounting and control
systems for MNEs – understood and solved
Classification Research
Deductive or judgmental approach Environmental factors
identified and linked to national accounting practices
International groupings or development patterns are proposed
Inductive or empirical approach Individual practices
analyzed Development patterns or
groupings identified Explanations based on
economic, social, political, and cultural factors proposed
Deductive approach
Mueller’s four approaches to accounting development Macroeconomic pattern
Business accounting is tied to national economic policies – Examples: Sweden, France, Germany
Microeconomic pattern Accounting is a branch of business economics –
Example: replacement-value accounting in Holland
Deductive approach
Mueller’s four approaches to accounting development Independent discipline pattern
Accounting is a service function derived from business practice – Examples: U.S. and U.K.
Uniform accounting pattern Accounting is an efficient means of administration and
control – Examples: France, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland
Nobes’s Hierarchial Classification
Inductive Approach
Nair and Frank (1980) findings 1973 data
Four measurement groups British Commonwealth Latin America Continental European U.S.
Seven disclosure groups Could not be plausibly described No explanation offered for difference in groupings
Inductive Approach
Nair and Frank (1980) findings Differences between measurement and
disclosure groups Hypotheses not supported
Cultural and economic variables associated with disclosure practices
Trading variables associated with measurement practices
Overall – little attention given to influence of culture
Cultural Influences on Accounting Systems Culture, Societal Values, and the Accounting Subculture – Fig. 2.3
Structural Elements of Culture
Hofstede – 4 Underlying societal dimensions Individualism Power Distance Uncertainty Avoidance Masculinity
Countries grouped into culture areas Hofstede and Bond – 5th dimension
Confucion Dynamism
Hofstede’s Societal Dimensions
Individualism versus Collectivism People’s self-concept: “I” or “we”
Large versus Small Power Distance How a society handles inequalities among people
Strong versus Weak Uncertainty Avoidance Control the future or just let it happen
Masculinity versus Femininity The way a society allocates social roles to gender
Confucian Dynamism Short-term or long-term orientation
Accounting Values – Gray
Professionalism versus statutory control Uniformity versus flexibility Conservatism versus optimism Secrecy versus transparency
Professionalism versus Statutory Control Accountants are perceived to have independent
attitudes throughout the world Public regulation or self regulation
U.K. – rely on judgment of accountant France and Germany – implement detailed legal
requirements Link to societal value dimensions – Professionalism
Individualism Weak uncertainty avoidance Small power distance Masculinity Short-term orientation
Uniformity versus Flexibility Uniform accounting plan and imposition of tax rules
for measurement purposes France and Spain
Facilitate national planning Pursue macroeconomic goals
Intertemporal consistency and some degree of intercompany comparability b/c of flexibility U.S. and U.K.
Link to societal value dimensions – Uniformity Strong uncertainty avoidance Collectivism Large power distance
Figure 2.4 Culture and Accounting Systems in Practice
Authority and Enforcement
Conservatism versus Optimism
Conservatism seen as a fundamental value Strongly conservative
Japan, France, Germany, Switzerland Less conservative
U.S., U.K., the Netherlands
Link to societal value dimensions – Conservatism Strong uncertainty avoidance Long-term orientation Collectivism Femininity
Secrecy versus Transparency Stems from management and accountants Closely related to conservatism
Secrecy relates to disclosure Conservatism relates to measurement
Secrecy High – Japan, France, Germany, Switzerland Low – U.S. and U.K.
Link to societal value dimensions – Secrecy Strong uncertainty avoidance High power distance Collectivism Femininity
Accounting Values and Societal Values
Accounting Values and International Classification
Accounting values most relevant to professional or statutory authority and enforcement Professionalism and Uniformity
Both concerned with regulation and degree of enforcement or conformity
Accounting values most relevant to measurement and disclosure Conservatism and secrecy
Country groupings Optimistic and transparent Conservative and secretive
Accounting Values and International Classification
International Pressures for Accounting Change
Growing international interdependencies Harmonization of the regulatory framework
internationally Centrally planned economies embraces
market-oriented approach Former U.S.S.R., Eastern Europe, China
New opportunities for international investment, joint ventures, and alliances
Economic Groupings and International Organizations
European Union Promotes economic integration/harmonization
UN World Bank International Monetary Fund UN conference on Trade and Development World Trade Organisation
OECD Foster international economic and social development in
industrialized countries “Code of Conduct” for MNEs
Impact of MNEs and Globalization
Cultural and social Employment and consumption patterns
Significantly influenced Pressure for more accountability Environmental impact
Impact of MNEs and Globalization
OECD, EU, IOSCO work for harmonization and internationalization of securities markets
IASB and the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) Professional organizations involved in
harmonization