chapter 2 (part 3)

29
Chapter 2 (Part 3): Failure Analysis and Prevention & Material Selection for Gas Systems BKG3493 GAS SYSTEM MATERIALS & COMPONENTS

Upload: renu-sekaran

Post on 02-May-2017

233 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

LOGO

Chapter 2 (Part 3): Failure Analysis and Prevention

& Material Selection for Gas Systems

BKG3493 GAS SYSTEM MATERIALS &

COMPONENTS

Page 2: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

CHAPTER OUTCOMES

At the end of this part, you should be able to:

i) Explain the other material failure properties such impact energy, fracture toughness, and fatique.

ii) Explain the common techniques of nondestructive testing, instruments being used, and the other nondestructive tests.

iii) Give the example of failure modes typically occur in engineering design

iv) Highlight general criteria in selecting material for gas systems and components.

Page 3: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

FAILURE OF MATERIALS

At room temperature, metal alloys and polymers stressed beyond their elastic limit eventually fracture following a period of plastic deformation. Brittle ceramics and glasses typically break following elastic deformation, without plastic deformation. The inherent brittleness of ceramics and glasses combined with their common use at high temperatures make thermal shock a major concern. With continuously service at relatively high temperatures, any engineering material can fracture when creep deformation reaches its limit.

We will look at additional ways in which materials fail!!

Page 4: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

IMPACT ENERGY

Corresponds to the measurement of toughness, or area under the stress-versus-strain curve. The energy necessary to fracture a standard test piece under an impact load, is a similar analog of toughness. The most common laboratory measurement of impact energy is the Charpy test. For polymers, the impact energy is typically measured by the Izod test. In general, we expect alloys with large values of both strength (Y.S and T.S) and ductility to have large-impact facture energies.

Page 5: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

Impact test

The Charpy impact test, also known as the Charpy v-notch test, is a standardized high strain-rate test which determines the amount of energy absorbed by a material during fracture.

This absorbed energy is a measure of a given material's toughness and acts as a tool to study temperature-dependent brittle-ductile transition.

If the material breaks on a flat plane, the fracture was brittle, and if the material breaks with jagged edges or shear lips, then the fracture was ductile.

Page 6: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

6

final height initial height

Adapted from Fig. 8.12(b), Callister 7e. (Fig. 8.12(b) is adapted from

H.W. Hayden, W.G. Moffatt, and J. Wulff, The Structure and Properties

of Materials, Vol. III, Mechanical Behavior, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

(1965) p. 13.)

(Charpy) Impact testing

Page 7: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

CHARPY TEST

Page 8: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

IMPACT TEST (CHARPY) DATA FOR SOME ALLOYS

Alloy Impact energy (J)

1040 carbon steel 180

8630 low alloy steel 55

Monel 400 (nickel alloy) 298

Page 9: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

IMPACT TEST (IZOD) DATA FOR SOME POLYMERS

Polymer Impact Energy (J)

PE (high density) 1.4-16

PE (low density) 22

Polyamides (nylon 66) 1.4

Page 10: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

Very Ductile

Moderately Ductile Brittle Fracture

behavior:

Large Moderate

%EL

Small

• Ductile fracture is

usually more desirable

than brittle fracture!

Ductile:

Warning before

fracture

Brittle:

No

warning

Page 11: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

11

• Ductile failure:

-- one piece

-- large deformation

Figures from V.J. Colangelo and F.A.

Heiser, Analysis of Metallurgical Failures

(2nd ed.), Fig. 4.1(a) and (b), p. 66 John

Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1987. Used with

permission.

Example: Pipe Failures

• Brittle failure:

-- many pieces

-- small deformations

Page 12: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

12

• Evolution to failure:

• Resulting

fracture

surfaces

(steel)

50 mm

particles

serve as void

nucleation

sites.

50 mm

From V.J. Colangelo and F.A. Heiser,

Analysis of Metallurgical Failures (2nd

ed.), Fig. 11.28, p. 294, John Wiley and

Sons, Inc., 1987. (Orig. source: P.

Thornton, J. Mater. Sci., Vol. 6, 1971, pp.

347-56.)

100 mm

Fracture surface of tire cord wire

loaded in tension. Courtesy of F.

Roehrig, CC Technologies, Dublin,

OH. Used with permission.

Moderately Ductile Failure

necking

s

void nucleation

void growth and linkage

shearing at surface

fracture

Page 13: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

FRACTURE TOUGHNESS

The term fracture mechanics has come to mean the general analysis of failure of structural materials with preexisting flaws- has brought the focus of much active research.

One of the parameter of fracture mechanics – fracture toughness.

Fracture toughness, KIC, is the critical value of the stress intensity factor at a crack tip necessary to produce catastrophic failure under simple uniaxial loading

A simple example- blow a balloon containing a small pinhole. When the internal pressure of the balloon reaches a critical value, catastrophic failure originates at the pinhole (the balloon pops)

Page 14: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

FATIGUE

So far, we have characterized the mechanical behavior of metals under a single load application either slowly (tensile test) or rapidly (impact test). Many structural applications involve cyclic rather than static loading, and a special problem arises. Fatigue – is the general phenomenon of material failure after several cycles of loading to a stress level below the ultimate tensile stress.

Page 15: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

15

Fatigue

• Fatigue = failure under cyclic stress.

• Stress varies with time.

-- key parameters are S, sm, and

frequency

s max

s min

s

time

s m S

• Key points: Fatigue...

-- can cause part failure, even though smax < sc.

-- causes ~ 90% of mechanical engineering failures.

Adapted from Fig. 9.24,

Callister & Rethwisch 3e.

(Fig. 9.24 is from Materials

Science in Engineering, 4/E

by Carl. A. Keyser, Pearson

Education, Inc., Upper

Saddle River, NJ.) tension on bottom

compression on top

counter motor

flex coupling

specimen

bearing bearing

Page 16: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING (NDT)

Method applied for the detection of surface breaking defects.

Is the evaluation of engineering materials without impairing their usefulness.

A central focus of many of the nondestructive testing is the identification of potentially critical flaws, such as surface and internal cracks.

For fracture mechanics, nondestructive testing can serve to analyze an existing failure or it can be used to prevent future failures.

The dominant techniques- x-radiography and ultrasonics

Page 17: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING (NDT)

The types of defect / flaw and degradation that can be detected using NDT are summarized as: Planar defects - these include flaws such as fatigue cracks, lack of side-wall fusion in welds, environmental assisted cracking such as hydrogen cracking and stress corrosion cracks; cold shuts in castings etc; Laminations - these include flaws such as rolling and forging laminations, laminar inclusions and de-laminations in composites; Voids and inclusions - these include flaws such as voids, slag and porosity in welds and voids in castings and forgings; Wall thinning - through life wall loss due to corrosion and erosion

Page 18: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

Testing of Quality of Weld Joints.

NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING (NDT)

Page 19: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

X-RADIOGRAPHY

Radiography is the detection of material loss by the variation in applied radiation, g or x-ray, passing through a component and impinging on a film.

Sensitive to material loss is better suited to the detection of volumetric defects such as slag or porosity

Defects are identified by abrupt changes in the density of the developed film: the film density is related to the exposure it has received from the radiation.

The quality and sensitivity of a radiograph are measured by the density of the film and the use of an IQI (Image quality indicators)

Page 20: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

X-RADIOGRAPHY

Page 21: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

ULTRASONIC TESTING

Use of high frequency sound waves in a similar manner to sonar or radar: sound pulses are reflected from interfaces or discontinuities.

In thickness checking the reflections from the wall surfaces are measured.

In defect detection reflections from cracks, voids and inclusions are detected and assessed.

The transfer of sound from the ultrasonic probe to the component requires a coupling medium, which is usually water or gel.

The condition of the interface determines how much sound is transferred into the component, how much is scattered and how much noise is produced.

A typical ultrasonic source involving a piezoelectric transducer

Page 22: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

ULTRASONIC TESTING

Page 24: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

OTHER NDT

Eddy-current testing Magnetic-particle testing Liquid-penetrant testing A coustic-emission testing

Page 25: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

FAILURE ANALYSIS & PREVENTION

The related issue of failure prevention is equally important for avoiding future disasters.

Ethical and legal issues are moving the field of material science and engineering into a central role in the broader topic of engineering design.

A wide spectrum of failure modes has been identified: 1) Ductile fracture 2) Brittle fracture 3) Fatigue fracture 4) Corrosion-fatigue failure 5) Stress-corrosion cracking (SCC) 6) Liquid-erosion failure 7)Liquid-metal embrittlement 8) Hydrogen embrittlement 9) Creep and stress-rapture failures, and etc

Page 26: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

EXAMPLE OF FAILURE MODES

Ductile fracture- Is observed in a large number of the failures occurring in metals due to overload (i.e., taking a material beyond the elastic limit and subsequently to fracture)

Brittle fracture – is characterized by rapid crack propagation without significant plastic deformation on macroscopic scale

Fatigue failure- by a mechanism of slow crack growth gives the distinctive “clamshell” fatigue-fracture surface

Corrosion-fatigue failure – is due to the combined actions of a cyclic stress and a corrosive environment. In general, the fatigue strength of the metal will be decreased in the presence of an aggressive, chemical environment.

Stress-corrosion cracking (SCC)- is another combined mechanical and chemical failure mechanism in which a non-cyclic tensile stress (below the Y.S) leads to the initiation and propagation of fracture in a relatively mild chemical environment. Can be intergranular, transgranular, or a combination of the two.

Page 27: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

EXAMPLE OF FAILURE MODES Liquid-erosion failure – a special form of wear damage in which a liquid is responsible for the removal of material. Its damage typically results in a pitted or honeycomb-like surface region.

Liquid-metal embrittlement – involves the material losing some degree of ductility or fracturing below its yield stress in conjunction with its surface being wetted by a lower-melting-point liquid metal.

Hydrogen embrittlement - the notorious form of catastrophic failure in high-strength steels. A few parts per million of hydrogen dissolved in these materials can produce substantial internal pressure, leading to fine, hairline cracks and loss of ductility.

Creep and stress-rapture failures - occur near room temperature for many polymers and certain low-melting-point metals, such as lead, but may occur above 1000oC in many ceramics and certain high-melting-point metals.

Page 28: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

MATERIAL SELECTION

Design

Service conditions

Function

Cost

Processing

Equipment selection

Influence on properties

Cost

Materials

Properties

Availibility

Cost

www.themegallery.com LOGO

Page 29: Chapter 2 (Part 3)

MATERIAL SELECTION FOR GAS SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS

Factors to be considered: Ability to accommodate/withstand

• Chemical reaction and soil type • Animal activity •Microorganism

Engineering aspect

• Corrosion control • Lifetime/lifespan

Cost involve

• Material cost/pipe cost – pipe cost depend on pipe thickness and size • Installation cost – labor cost, welder and their assistance, etc