b ehavioral m odel of s tock e xchange fuad aleskerov, and lyudmila egorova national research...

38
BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF STOCK EXCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome “Tor Vergata” November 29, 2011

Post on 21-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF STOCK EXCHANGE

Fuad Aleskerov,and Lyudmila Egorova

National Research UniversityHigher School of Economics

University of Rome “Tor Vergata”November 29, 2011

Page 2: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

INTRODUCTION

«The central idea of this book concerns our blindness with respect to randomness, particularly the large deviations: Why do we, scientists or nonscientists, hotshots or regular Joes, tend to see the pennies instead of the dollars? Why do we keep focusing on the minutiae, not the possible significant large events, in spite of the obvious evidence of their huge influence?»

Nassim Nicolas Taleb

«The Black Swan. The Impact of The Highly Improbable»2

Page 3: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

We will model economic fluctuations representing them as a flows of events of two types:

Q-event reflects the “normal mode” of an economy;

R-event is responsible for a crisis.

The number of events in each time interval has a Poisson distribution with constant intensity.

is the intensity of the flow of regular events Q. is the intensity of the flow of crisis events R. >> holds (that is, Q-type events are far more frequent than the R-type events).

3

Page 4: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

POISSON DISTRIBUTION

The Poisson distribution is a discrete probability distribution that expresses the probability of a number k of events occurring in a fixed period of time if these events occur with a known average rate λ and independently of the time since the last event.

4

Page 5: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

5

Page 6: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

6

Page 7: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

7

Page 8: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

8

Page 9: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

X

Q

RThe problem of correct identification (recognition)

Unknown

State of nature

Page 10: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

X

Q

R

Q

Q

R

R

Player´s perceived identification of the state of nature

Page 11: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

X

Q

R

Q

Q

R

R

aPayoff of correct identification of regular event

Page 12: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

X

Q

R

Q

Q

R

R -bIncorrect identification of regular event

Page 13: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

X

Q

R

Q

R

Q

R

d>>b-d

cc>>a

Page 14: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

14

right

right

wrong

wrong

Page 15: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

How large will be the sum of payoffs received up to time t?

15

Page 16: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

16

Page 17: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

17

Q

Page 18: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

18

Q

Page 19: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PROBLEM

19

Q R

Page 20: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

SOLUTION

Random value Z of the total sum of the received payoffs during the time t is a compound Poisson type variable.

We give the expression for the expectation of a random variable payoff:

𝐸 (𝑍 )=𝜆𝑡 ( (1−𝑞1 )𝑎−𝑞1𝑏)+𝜇𝑡 ( (1−𝑞2 )𝑐−𝑞2𝑑 )

Page 21: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

ANALYSIS OF THE SOLUTION

What conditions should the values of q1 and q2 satisfy for the expected value E(Z) to be nonnegative with all other parameters being fixed?

21

Page 22: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

ANALYSIS OF THE SOLUTION

What conditions should the values of q1 and q2 satisfy for the expected value E(Z) to be nonnegative with all other parameters being fixed?

22

if

if

Page 23: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

ANALYSIS OF THE SOLUTION

23

E(Z)0

Page 24: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

EXAMPLE

Let q2=1.

How often the player can fail to identify regular event to have still positive or at least zero average gain E(Z)?

24

=>

Page 25: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

APPLICATION TO REAL DATA

We consider a stock exchange and events Q and R which describe a ‘business as usual’ and a ‘crisis’, respectively.

The unknown event X can be interpreted as a signal received, e.g. by an economic analyst or by a broker, about the changes of the economy that helps him to decide whether the economy is in ‘a normal mode’ or in a crisis.

Page 26: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PARAMETERS FOR S&P 500

02/0

8/19

99

22/1

1/19

99

13/0

3/20

00

03/0

7/20

00

23/1

0/20

00

12/0

2/20

01

04/0

6/20

01

24/0

9/20

01

14/0

1/20

02

06/0

5/20

02

26/0

8/20

02

16/1

2/20

02

07/0

4/20

03

28/0

7/20

03

17/1

1/20

03

08/0

3/20

04

28/0

6/20

04

18/1

0/20

04

07/0

2/20

05

30/0

5/20

05

19/0

9/20

05

09/0

1/20

06

01/0

5/20

06

21/0

8/20

06

11/1

2/20

06

02/0

4/20

07

23/0

7/20

07

12/1

1/20

07

03/0

3/20

08

23/0

6/20

08

13/1

0/20

08

02/0

2/20

09

25/0

5/20

09

14/0

9/20

090

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

21.09.2001

23.07.2002

25.10.2002 21.01.2008

16.10.2008

09.03.2009

30.07.2009

26

Page 27: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

COMPARISONS

Estimates for indices with the threshold 6%

Index λ μ a, % -b, % c, % -d, %

S&P 500 246 4 0,6 -0,6 2,8 -2,9

Dow Jones 246 4 0,6 -0,6 1,9 -2,4

CAC 40 243 7 0,8 -0,8 3,0 -2,5

DAX 239 11 0,8 -0,9 2,1 -2,5

Nikkei 225 245 5 0,8 -0,9 2,6 -3,2

Hang Seng 241 9 0,9 -0,9 2,6 -3,0

27

Page 28: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PARAMETERS FOR S&P 500

In fact, it is enough to identify regular Q-events in half of the cases to ensure a positive outcome of the game.

E(Z)0

Probability of incorrect identification of crisis R-event

Probability of incorrect recognition of regular Q-event

Page 29: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

PARAMETERS FOR S&P 500

Indeed, if we choose the horizon of 1 year and the error probability for events Q and R being q1=0.46, q2=1 (i.e. even when crises are not at all correctly identified), the expected gain is still positive (although almost zero).

29

Page 30: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

NEW MODELS

30

k

Page 31: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

MODEL WITH STIMULATION

if

if

Page 32: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

MODEL WITH STIMULATION

32

Page 33: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

MODEL WITH LEARNING

if

if

Page 34: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

CALCULATIONS

34

If error probabilities are equal to 0.46 and 1 respectively in the basic model, then the expectation of the gain is equal to E(Z)=0.

Model with

stimulation

Model with training

Critical

0.464

0.477

0.462

0.466

0.461

0.461

0.464

0.497

0.462

0.473

0.461

0.461

0.464

0.522

0.462

0.485

0.461

0.462

0.464

0.554

0.462

0.504

0.461

0.465

Page 35: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

CALCULATIONS

35

Model with

training

Critical

0.490 0.477 0.470 0.466

0.496 0.481 0.472 0.467

0.500 0.483 0.473 0.468

0.523 0.497 0.482 0.473

0.526 0.499 0.483 0.473

0.529 0.502 0.485 0.472

0.540 0.509 0.490 0.478

Page 36: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

CONCLUSION

We showed in a very simple model that

with a small reward for the correct (with probability slightly higher than ½) identification of the routine events (and if crisis events are identified with very low probability) the average player's gain will be positive.

In other words, players do not need to play more sophisticated games, trying to identify crises events in advance.

Page 37: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

CONCLUSION

We considered new models adding rewards for “successful behavior” as increases in gain and as increases in the probability of correct identification, which means that the player can learn from his past actions and accumulate experience.

Both of these models allows the player to enlarge the total gain and to make more mistakes, because he/she can get more in the sequence of correctly identified events.

37

Page 38: B EHAVIORAL M ODEL OF S TOCK E XCHANGE Fuad Aleskerov, and Lyudmila Egorova National Research University Higher School of Economics University of Rome

THANK YOU!