c:\documents and settings\kim\desktop\6610michaudmodule3b

A qualitative meta-analysis of e-learning and student motivation

and attitude.Kim Michaud

Findings of the studies: purpose, methods,

frameworks

Synthesis of conclusions

of the 15 studies

Synthesis of implications

of the 15 studies

Discussion of

findings

Conclusions

Implications

Limitations

REFERENCES1- DeVaney, T.A. (2009). Impact of video tutorials in an online educational statistics

course. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5 (4), 600-608.

2- Kim, C., & Keller, J.M. (2008). Effects of motivational and volitional email messages(MVEM) with personal messages on undergraduate students’ motivation, study habits

and achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 36-51.3- Bugos, J.A., Dixon, M.B., & Nelson, J. (2009) Podcasting: A method of enhancing course perceptions and performance in music appreciation international. International

Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1).4- Hodge, A., Richardson, J. C., & York, C. S. (2009). The impact of a web-based homework tool in university algebra courses on student learning and strategies.

MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 618-629.5- George-Palilonis, J., & Filak, V. (2009). Blended learning in the visual

communications classroom: Student reflections on a multimedia course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(3), 247 – 256.

6- Bradshaw, A.C., & Johari, A. (2008). Project-based learning in an internship program: A qualitative study of related roles and their motivational attributes. Educational

Technology Research and Development, 56 (3), 329-359. 7- Reeves, T.C., & Wang, S. (2006). The effects of a web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Educational Technology

Research and Development, 54(6), 597-621.

8- Lee, T., Shen, P., Ting, C., & Tsai, C. (2008). Exploring the effects of web-enabled problem-based learning and self-regulated learning on vocational students’ involvement in learning. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning, 1(9).9- Liu, M. (2006). The effect of a hypermedia learning environment on middle school students' motivation, attitude, and science knowledge. Computers in the Schools, 22(3), 159 -171.10- Murphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M.A. (2009). Teachers’ perspectives on motivation in high school distance Education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(3), 1-24.11- Bassili, J.N. (2008). Motivation and cognitive strategies in the choice to attend lectures or watch them online. Journal of Distance Education, 22(3), 129-148.12- Kikuchi, H. (2006). Motivational factors affecting online learning by Japanese MBA students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 398-415.13- Tirotta, R., & Torff, B. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education 54(2), 379-383.14- Zhang, T., Koehler, M.J., & Spatariu, A. (2009). The development of the motivation for critical reasoning in online discussions inventory. American Journal of Distance Education, 23(4), 194-211.

15- Choi, H. J., & Johnson, S.D. (2005). The effect of context-based video instruction on learning and motivation in online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 215-227.Ames, C. A. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teacher College Record,91(3), 409-421.