a perspective on community development steve turkoski 4/24/2013
TRANSCRIPT
A Perspective on Community Development
Steve Turkoski4/24/2013
• Context and Relationships• Source of Wealth• Community-Ties that bind/Hierarchy of areas• Impact of MSA’s• Standard of Living• Levels of Planning• Significance of Education• Regional Flow of Money
Context
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/3121
42 USC CHAPTER 38 - PUBLIC WORKS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT42 USC § 3121 - FINDINGS AND DECLARATIONS (a) Findings Congress finds that—(1)there continue to be areas of the United States experiencing chronic high unemployment, underemployment, outmigration, and low per capita incomes, as well as areas facing sudden and severe economic dislocations because of structural economic changes, changing trade patterns, certain Federal actions (including environmental requirements that result in the removal of economic activities from a locality), and natural disasters;(2)economic growth in the States, cities, and rural areas of the United States is produced by expanding economic opportunities, expanding free enterprise through trade, developing and strengthening public infrastructure, and creating a climate for job creation and business development;(3)the goal of Federal economic development programs is to raise the standard of living for all citizens and increase the wealth and overall rate of growth of the economy by encouraging communities to develop a more competitive and diversified economic base by—(A)creating an environment that promotes economic activity by improving and expanding public infrastructure;(B)promoting job creation through increased innovation, productivity, and entrepreneurship; and(C)empowering local and regional communities experiencing chronic high unemployment and low per capita income to develop private sector business and attract increased private sector capital investment;(4)while economic development is an inherently local process, the Federal Government should work in partnership with public and private State, regional, tribal, and local organizations to maximize the impact of existing resources and enable regions, communities, and citizens to participate more fully in the American dream and national prosperity;
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/5301
42 USC CHAPTER 69 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT42 USC § 5301 - CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS AND DECLARATION OF PURPOSE (a) Critical social, economic, and environmental problems facing Nation’s urban communities The Congress finds and declares that the Nation’s cities, towns, and smaller urban communities face critical social, economic, and environmental problems arising in significant measure from—(1)the growth of population in metropolitan and other urban areas, and the concentration of persons of lower income in central cities;(2)inadequate public and private investment and reinvestment in housing and other physical facilities, and related public and social services, resulting in the growth and persistence of urban slums and blight and the marked deterioration of the quality of the urban environment; and(3)increasing energy costs which have seriously undermined the quality and overall effectiveness of local community and housing development activities
Community Development-“a comprehensive process for managing community change that involves citizens in a dialog to decide what must be done and then involves them in doing it.” “Critical issues addressed in the CD process include: job and economic development (business attraction, expansion, and retention, and new business development); education and workforce development; infrastructure development and improvement; quality of life, culture and recreation; social issues such as housing, crime, teen pregnancy and substance abuse; leadership development; quality of governmental services; community image and marketing; and tourism development” Emphasis added. Community Development Handbook, Chapter 1, Page 2.
Economic Development-The main goal of economic development is improving the economic well- being of a community through efforts that entail job creation, job retention, tax base enhancements and quality of life. As there is no single definition for economic development, there is no single strategy, policy or program for achieving successful economic development. Communities differ in their geographic and political strengths and weaknesses. Each community therefore, will have a unique set of challenges for economic development. Emphasis added. From the International Economic Development Council (IEDC) web site: http://www.iedconline.org/hotlinks/whtecodev.html
http://www.wpri.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Circular-CRD-59.pdf
Workforce Development-“Workforce development” is an essential component of community economic development in any economic climate, and certainly even more critical during the financial crises we’re experiencing today. Generally speaking, the term has come to describe a relatively wide range of activities, policies and programs employed by geographies to create, sustain and retain a viable workforce that can support current and future business and industry. Beyond this general understanding, it is difficult to gain a consensus as to the definition of workforce development, perhaps because each user of the term approaches it from a different perspective. Emphasis added. http://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/br/articles/?id=1953
Leadership Development- "an intentional effort to provide leaders and emerging leaders with opportunities to learn, grow and change." Its purpose is "to produce individuals over time with the skills to function effectively within the organization." http://www.hillconsultinggroup.org/assets/pdfs/articles/essentials-lead-dev.pdf
Standard of Living• Standard of Living-the necessities, comforts, and luxuries
enjoyed or aspired to by an individual or group. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/standard%20of%20living
• Quality of Life-The term quality of life (QOL) references the general well-being of individuals and societies. The term is used in a wide range of contexts, including the fields of international development, healthcare, and politics. Quality of life should not be confused with the concept of standard of living, which is based primarily on income. Instead, standard indicators of the quality of life include not only wealth and employment, but also the built environment, physical and mental health, education, recreation and leisure time, and social belonging. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_of_life
http://www.wpri.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Community-Development2.pdf
Quality of Life
Standard of Living
Community Development
Economic
Development
Leadership
Development
Workforce Developme
nt
Geographic Area & Resident Engagement
Community
Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators
• Education• Employment• Energy• Environmental• Health• Human Rights• Income• Infrastructure• National Security• Public Safety• Re-Creation• Shelter
http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/atlas-of-rural-and-small-town-america/go-to-the-atlas.aspx
Creative Class
Legal Hierarchy
• Dillon’s Rule or Home Rule• Growth Management
Tiebout’s Hypothosis
• The notion that people relocate from one political jurisdiction to another in search of a more preferred package of government taxes and spending. This hypothesis suggests that people "shop" for compatible government activity in the same way they might shop for a car, a house, or a flavor of ice cream. The Tiebout hypothesis indicates that people have two methods of "voting" on government activity -- one is at the ballot box the other is with their feet by seeking a more preferred location
From 2000 to 2010, the population of Alabama grew by 332,636, while 31 counties lost population.
In 2010 74.8% of the state GDP was generated in the MSAs, and 73.4% of the state workforce was in the 11 MSAs.http://www.policom.com/2013MAPS/ALMETMIC2013.pdf
A Quantitative Analysis of Human Capital as an Economic Development Tool for the
South
DissertationSubmitted to Northcentral University
Graduate Faculty of the School of Business and Technology Managementin Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
byBethany Parker MullinPrescott Valley, ArizonaOctober 2010
Rostow’s Stages of Growth
• Traditional Society-subsistence agriculture and hunting
• Preconditions for take-commercial agriculture, investment in production
• Take-off-manufactured goods for export and consumption
• Drive to Maturity-diversification, development of transportation infrastructure
• Age of high mass consumption-industrial base dominates, populace have disposable income
Bullock
, AL
Barbour, A
L
Faye
tte, AL
Blount, AL
DeKalb
, AL
Winsto
n, AL
Macon, A
L
Perry,
AL
Chambers
, AL
Hale, A
L
Escam
bia, AL
Monroe,
AL
Chilton, A
L
Choctaw, A
L
Butler, A
L
Cleburn
e, AL
Covingto
n, AL
Henry,
AL
Picken
s, AL
Clarke
, AL
Crensh
aw, A
L
Talla
dega,
AL
Talla
poosa, AL
Marshall
, AL
Mobile, A
L
Marengo
, AL
Elmore,
AL
Calhoun, A
L
Autauga
, AL
Pike, A
L
Baldwin, A
L
Coffee, A
L
Madiso
n, AL
Shelb
y, AL
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
Avg Wage/Job PCI MHI
DeKalb
, AL
Greene,
AL
Frankli
n, AL
Bullock
, AL
Marion, A
L
Randolph, A
L
Wilc
ox, AL
Chambers
, AL
Crensh
aw, A
L
Sumter
, AL
Perry,
AL
Marshall
, AL
Conecuh, A
L
Escam
bia, AL
Talla
poosa, AL
Henry,
AL
Faye
tte, AL
Cullman
, AL
Covingto
n, AL
Russell,
AL
Butler, A
L
Clarke
, AL
Wash
ington, A
L
Calhoun, A
L
Coffee, A
L
Colbert, A
L
Etowah
, AL
Houston, A
L
Mobile, A
L
Dale, A
L
Montgomery
, AL
Autauga
, AL
Baldwin, A
L
St. Clai
r, AL
0.000
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.700
0.800
0.900
1.000
HS Grad 4-Year Poverty Gini
Education in Community and Economic Development
U.S. Alabama Houston Co. Dothan0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.084.6
80.8 81.383.0
27.5
21.519.4
23.4
Education Levels-2009
High School 4-Year Degree
Percent
http://www.wpri.info/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Community-Wide-Education-and-Its-Impact-on-Per-Capita-Income6.pdf
DeKalb
, AL
Winsto
n, AL
Hale, A
L
Marion, A
L
Clay, A
L
Randolph, A
L
Chambers
, AL
Genev
a, AL
Escam
bia, AL
Cheroke
e, AL
Crensh
aw, A
L
Jackso
n, AL
Blount, AL
Faye
tte, AL
Lawren
ce, AL
Monroe,
AL
Walk
er, AL
Chilton, A
L
Henry,
AL
Covingto
n, AL
Cullman
, AL
Wash
ington, A
L
Picken
s, AL
Coffee, A
L
Pike, A
L
Colbert, A
L
Morgan, A
L
Houston, A
L
Mobile, A
L
Elmore,
AL
Tusca
loosa, AL
Autauga
, AL
Baldwin, A
L
Shelb
y, AL
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
Alabama Counties Sorted By Percent Population Over 25 That Have Completed High School
Unemployment Rate 3/12 Unwed Teen Birth Rate
U.S. Code Title 20, Chapter 48, Section 3401
• Education is fundamental to the development of individual citizens and progress of the Nation.
• There is a continuing need to ensure equal access for all Americans to educational opportunities of a high quality, and such educational opportunities should not be denied because of race, creed, color, national origin, or sex.
• Parents have the primary responsibility for the education of their children, and the States, localities, and private institutions have the primary responsibility for supporting that parental role.
Regional Flow of Money
Houston Coffee Dale Covington Pike Geneva Barbour Henry0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
2010 Wiregrass Counties Average Annual Employment
Genev
a
Henry
Covin
gton
Coffee
Barbou
rDale Pi
ke
Housto
n
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
2010 Worker Inflow and Outflow
Estimated Dothan Daytime Population in 2011=131,000 based on employment inflow and ratio of Dothan per capita sales to state per capita sales. In 2007, the
average state retail sale per capita was $12,364. For the U.S. it was $12,990.
Dale Houston Pike Henry Covington Barbour Coffee Geneva$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
2010 Average Wage per Job of Wiregrass Region Counties
Houston Dale Pike Coffee Covington Barbour Geneva Henry$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
$2,000,000
2010 Wiregrass Counties Wage & Salary Disbursement X 1000
Barbour Coffee Dale Covington Geneva Henry Houston Pike
-$1,000,000
-$800,000
-$600,000
-$400,000
-$200,000
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
Flow of Earnings From Place of Work To Residence 2009 & 2011 X 1,000
20092011