8 2008, jeffrey dorfman the economics of growth, sprawl and land use decisions jeffrey h. dorfman...

19
2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

Upload: albert-boggus

Post on 22-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions

Jeffrey H. Dorfman

The University of Georgia

Page 2: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Some Economic Growth Facts

Farm Lands and Green Space The Impact of Development Types Southeastern US Results Jobs and Housing Break-even Home Values The Effect of Development Patterns

Page 3: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Economic Benefits of Farm and Forest Lands

These lands produce valuable products for consumers, generate jobs and tax revenues 1/6 of all jobs and gross state

product in GA

These lands attract businesses and families

These lands also provide a net surplus to local government finances

Page 4: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Economic Benefits of Green Space

Green spaces increase property values of surrounding land

Green and open spaces can provide environmental amenities for free

If green spaces contribute to quality of life, you attract people and jobs to community

Page 5: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Development by Type Many counties and cities think

that growth and development mean an increasing tax base and better financial health for the local government.

Unfortunately a growing tax base is not enough to guarantee financial health, you must get revenue to grow faster than expenditures.

Page 6: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Some Southeastern US ResultsRevenue:Expenditure Ratios

$0.00

$0.50

$1.00

$1.50

$2.00

$2.50

$3.00

$3.50

Resid. Comm. Farm/for.

Oconee

Hall

Thomas

Carroll

Jones

Cherokee

Union (NC)

Leon (FL)

Page 7: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Jobs, Commuting, and Home 31% if workers in Rural South

work in a different county than where they live.

52% of employment growth in metro areas was from in-commuters.

27% of employment growth in rural areas was from in-commuters.

jobs ≠ housing growth

Source: Mitch Renkow, NC State

Page 8: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Break-even Home Values

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

County

1 kid

2 kids

3 kids

1000 $

JonesCarrollCherokee

Page 9: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Development Patterns Development patterns have an impact

on the cost of service delivery: sprawl is expensive to service.

The same growth done more densely and contiguously saves both money, farmland, and provides environmental amenities.

New Jersey, South Carolina, California studies

Page 10: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

How to Change the Numbers Cost of service goes down by 50% of

land savings (use half the land, save 25%).

Avoid leapfrog development. Build where infrastructure already

exists (infill is much cheaper than extensive growth).

Multifamily is less expensive per unit until density gets very high.

Design so service costs are low. No unnecessary minimum lot sizes.

Page 11: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Breakeven Value Ranges

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Town Schools

$100

0's

Page 12: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Breakeven by Density, Location This city has average

density of just < 1 per acre

Can model density and location of housing

2 acre lot, edge of town

1/3 acre, midtown Multifamily, in town

285

173

8042

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

$100

0

Breakeven Value

Large Lot Baseline

Small Lot Multifamily

Page 13: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Manufactured Housing

$0.00

$0.20

$0.40

$0.60

$0.80

$1.00

Dollars of Revenue per $1 of Service Cost

Colquitt

Grady

Hall

Mitchell

Thomas

Page 14: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Land Preservation Conflicts

Density vs Land Preservation Housing and Farming: Can They Mix?

Page 15: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Density and Rural Character

To preserve rural character, need very low density.

Houses on 2 acre lots will be < 100 yds apart.

Population growth is exogenous, so lower density = more land developed.

Page 16: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Can Housing and Farming Mix? To preserve commercial

agriculture, you must keep residential development out.

Neighbors demand changes in production practices that increase costs.

Loss of farming in an area drives local suppliers out of business.

Shrinking local production hurts local marketing.

Page 17: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Possible Government Tools Zoning Standards Impact fees Incentives (time, approval,

differential fees) TDRs PDRs Time Infrastructure

Page 18: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Balanced Growth a Must The real conclusion is

Local governments must ensure balanced growth, as sprawling residential growth is a certain ticket to fiscal ruin*.

* Or at least big tax increases.

Page 19: 8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia

8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman

Other Resources To see similar slides to those

printed here and other graphs, reports, and resources on the economics of growth and land use, you can use the web at:

landuse.uga.edu