1 at a polluted urban location supplementary information ... · 1 supplementary information of 2...
TRANSCRIPT
1 Supplementary Information of
2 Highly time resolved chemical characterization of submicron organic aerosols
3 at a polluted urban location
4 Authors: N.V.S Bharath Kumar 1, Abhishek Chakraborty 1, S.N.Tripathi1, 2* and Deepika
5 Bhattu1
6 Author affiliation: 1. Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
7 2. Centre of Environmental Science and Engineering, CESE, IIT Kanpur
8 *Corresponding author(s) E-mail: [email protected]
10
11 Figures: S1-S9
12 Page: S1-S8
13 Tables: S1
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016
26
27 Fig. S1: AMS vs SMPS mass concentration plot to justify the choice of CE value of 0.5. SMPS 28 mass is obtained from volume concentration by assuming a density of 1.4 g/cc as reported in 29 previous studies 1,2 from this location.
30
31
32 Fig. S2: f44 vs f60 plot to demonstrate the oxidation of biomass burning organic aerosol. Grey 33 dashed line denotes the background f60 value taken from Cubison et al., (2011)3.
34
35 1. Organic PMF Diagnostics:
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
2/12 2/15 2/18 2/21 2/24 2/27 3/2 3/5 3/8 3/11 3/14 3/17 3/20
.
40
30
20
10
0
(
Res
id2 /
2 )/Q
exp Total Residual/Total Variance/Qexp
9
8
7
6
5
Q/Q
expe
cted
87654321P
Q for fPeak 0 Current Solution min Q for p
5.3
5.2
5.1
5.0
Q/Q
expe
cted
-4 -2 0 2 4fPeak
Q for p 6 Current Solution min Q for fpeakOrSeed
49
50 Fig.S3: Diagnostic information for the PMF analysis.
51
52
53
54
55
56
No. of factors Remarks
<5 No HOA or SVOOA factor was identified, one HOA like factor with
hydrocarbon dominated mass spectra also has higher m/z 60 signals.
Several factors have identical mass spectra with very similar O/C
ratios. Some key m/z’s like, 43,44 and 60 have high residuals.
5 Still, no clear HOA and SVOOA factors were seen. One HOA looks
alike factor has high O/C ratio and m/z 44 signals. m/z 60 still have a
high residual in spite of 3 BBOA factors.
6 (Chosen solution) One clear HOA factor was identified along with one oxygenated POA
factor. Types of primary BBOA factors were now reduced to 2.
Significant reduction in residuals of key m/z’s was observed.
7 BBOA factors now started splitting but without any change in m/z’s
residuals or diurnal patterns
> 8 Now, OOA factors were also started splitting.
57
58 Table S1: Rationale of choosing optimum PMF factors.
59
60 Fig. S4: Comparison between inter/external tracers and the different OA factors.
61
62 Figure S5 (a): Factor profiles of 5 factor PMF solution.
63
64 Figure S5 (b): Factor profiles of 5 7 factor PMF solution.
65
66 Fig. S6: Diurnal pattern for a) 5 factor and b) 7 factor PMF solution, c) residuals for 5,6 and 7 67 factor PMF solutions.
68
69
70
71 Fig. S7: Relative contributions of different NR-PM1 aerosol species and various OAs in the 72 different air masses. C1..C6 are denoting back trajectory air masses cluster 1 to 6 (Fig. 5).
73
74
75 Fig. S8: Van Krevelen diagram (H/C vs. O/C plot) showing the difference in the slopes of OA 76 evolution from HPE (High pollution events) and LPE (Low pollution events).
77
78 Fig. S9: RH vs O/C correlation during DJ & FM nights.