© risk decisions, 2009 getting a return on investment from risk management val jonas ceo, risk...
TRANSCRIPT
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Getting a Return On Investment from
Risk Management
Val Jonas
CEO, Risk Decisions Group
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Agenda
· Understanding uncertainty and risk
· Impact on ROI
· A recent example & conclusion
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Part 1
Understanding uncertainty and risk
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Uncertainty & Risk
• Risk analysis & Tornado results
{ • 3 point estimates (Max, Min, Most likely)
• Identified risks(probability & Impact)
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Budget Uncertainty Analysis
Cost (£k)
Like
lihoo
d
0
20%
49%
60%
80%
100%
£4
5,0
00
£5
0,0
00
£5
5,0
00
£6
0,0
00
£6
5,0
00
£7
0,0
00
£7
5,0
00
£8
0,0
00
£8
5,0
00
£9
0,0
00
50% confidence
(Excluding Risk Events)
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Cost (£k)
£45,0
00
£50,0
00
£55,0
00
£60,0
00
£65,0
00
£70,0
00
£75,0
00
£80,0
00
£85,0
00
£90,0
00
Baseline (incl. Estimating Error) Exposure
Budget Uncertainty Analysis
RiskAppetite
(Excluding Risk Events)
‘Long’ right hand tail may indicate risk events (which should be
managed in risk register)
Ta
rget
Max
imu
m
Aggressivetarget
Non-Aggressivetarget
Min
imu
m
Lik
ely
© Risk Decisions, 2009
0
2,0
00
4,0
00
6,0
00
8,0
00
10,0
00
12,0
00
14,0
00
16,0
00
18,0
00
20,0
00
22,0
00
24,0
00
26,0
00
28,0
00
30,0
00
32,0
00
34,0
00
36,0
00
Provision for known risks
Provision for Known Risks
Exposure
Bu
dg
et
RiskAppetite
Max
imu
m
Min
imu
mPay attention to ‘Long’ right hand tail (must identify mitigation
actions)
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Managing uncertainty and risk
¾ Manage cost and schedule over-runs• Estimating accuracy• Resource management• Project & change control
¾ Manage known threats• Proactive risk mitigation actions• Treat, transfer, tolerate, terminate• Budget and authority in place
¾ Exploit opportunities
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Focus on ‘Left Shift’
Baseline
Targ
et
Reserve
Co
ntr
act
ed
Exposure
© Risk Decisions, 2009
How to convince senior management?
¾ Limited ability to interpret risk analysis results¾ Confusion over meaning of Risk Appetite¾ Consider risk budget spent as ‘wasted’¾ Focussed on business objectives
(and the bottom line)
… We need to find new ways of getting information across to managers
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Part 2
Impact on Return on Investment
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Achieving return
· Contracting routes¾ Fixed price (vs. cost plus)¾ Fixed base + performance payments¾ Bonuses & penalties for on-time or late delivery¾ Pain / gain-share
· Business case¾ Need to understand sensitivity to uncertainty and risk
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Modelling performance
Outcomes
Inputs
© Risk Decisions, 2009
What-if scenarios on schedule
· Analyse the schedule
· Impacts of schedule uncertainty on:¾ 1a. Performance payments¾ 1b. Penalty and bonus payments¾ 1c. Costs of the ‘Marching Army’
· Contain the impact of schedule slippage
© Risk Decisions, 2009
19 O
ct 2008
8 N
ov 2
008
28 N
ov 2
008
18 D
ec 2
008
7 J
an 2
009
27 J
an 2
009
16 F
eb 2
009
8 M
ar
2009
28 M
ar
2009
17 A
pr
2009
7 M
ay 2
009
27 M
ay 2
009
16 J
un 2
009
6 J
ul 2009
26 J
ul 2009
15 A
ug 2
009
4 S
ep 2
009
24 S
ep 2
009
Analysing the schedule
Baseline Schedule Reserve Exposure
Max
imu
m
Min
imu
m
Targ
et
RiskAppetite
Co
ntr
acte
dAggressive
targetNon-Aggressive
target
© Risk Decisions, 2009
1a. Impact on performance payments
Expected Reduction of 15% ROI
Zeroperformancepaymentfor latemilestones
© Risk Decisions, 2009
1b. Added impact of penalties/bonuses
NegativeexpectedROI(down 21%)
Dailypenalties/ bonusesfor late / earlydelivery
© Risk Decisions, 2009
1c. Added impact of the ‘marching army’
No chanceof positiveROI(down 23%)
Assumes noopportunityfor savings iffinished early
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Focus on ‘Left Shift’
Contain schedule slip
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Managing the uncertainty
What-if’s based on containing the schedule slip:
(Do we really want this contract?)
© Risk Decisions, 2009
What-if scenarios on risk
· 2a. The cost of risks materialising
· 2b. The post mitigation position
· 2b. Pain/Gain-share contracting
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Back to base case model
Outcomes
Inputs
© Risk Decisions, 2009
2a. Impact of risks materialising
Risks impact(down 12%)
Assumesno risk mitigation
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Focus on ‘Left Shift’
Manage the risks
© Risk Decisions, 2009
2b. Impact of risks (post mitigation)
Mitigatonsaves2% ROI
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Risk sharing scenario15%
confidence65%
confidence
© Risk Decisions, 2009
2c. Pain/Gainshare contracting
Back to15% ROI
Customershareof the risk payment
© Risk Decisions, 2009
More what-ifs …
© Risk Decisions, 2009
Part 3
Conclusion
© Risk Decisions, 2009
but… …can we afford not to manage risk?
Not so much a question of… what is the value of risk management?
© Risk Decisions, 2009
‘Getting a Return on Investment from Risk Management’
White paper:www.riskdecisions.com
Val Jonas, CEO Risk Decisions Group