decisions -- under risk

Upload: bella-novitasari

Post on 02-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    1/21

    Decision Models

    Making DecisionsUnder Risk

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    2/21

    Decision Making Under Risk

    When doing decision making underuncertainty, we assumed we had no

    idea about which state of nature would

    occur. In decision making under risk, we assume

    we have some idea (by experience, gut

    feel, experiments, etc.) about thelikelihood of each state of natureoccurring.

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    3/21

    The Expected Value Approach Given a set of probabilities for the states of

    nature, p1

    , p2

    etc., for each decision anexpected payoff can be calculated by:

    pi(payoffi) If this is a decision that will be repeated over

    and over again, the decision with the highestexpected payoff should be the one selected tomaximize total expected payoff.

    But if this is a one-time decision, perhaps therisk of losing much money may be too great --thus the expected payoff is just another pieceof information to be considered by the decisionmaker.

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    4/21

    Expected Value Decision

    Suppose the broker has offered his ownprojections for the probabilities of the statesof nature:

    P(S1) = .2, P(S2) = .3, P(S3) = .3, P(S4) = .1, P(S5) = .1

    -$100

    -$150-$100$150$200$250

    $60

    -$200 -$600

    $100 $200 $300 $0

    S1

    Lg Rise

    S2

    Sm Rise

    S3

    No Chg.

    S4

    Sm Fall

    S5

    Lg Fall

    D1: Gold

    D2: Bond

    D3: Stock

    D4: C/D $60

    $500

    $60 $60$60

    $250 $100

    .2 .3 .3 .1 .1Probability

    Expected Value

    .2(-100)+.3(100)+

    .3(200)+.1(300)+.1(0)

    .2(250)+.3(200)+.3(150)+.1(-100)+.1(-150)

    .2(500)+.3(250)+.3(100)

    +.1(-200)+.1(-600).2(60)+.3(60)+.3(60)

    +.1(60)+.1(60)

    $100

    $130

    $125

    $60

    H ighest -- Choose D2 - Bond

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    5/21

    Perfect Information

    Although the states of nature are assumed to

    occur with the previous probabilities, supposeyou knew, each time which state of naturewould occur -- i.e. you had perfect information

    Then when you knew S1 was going to occur,you would make the best decision for S1 (Stock= $500). This would happen p1 = .2 of the time.

    When you knew S2 was going to occur, you

    would make the best decision for S2 (Stock =$250). This would happen p2 = .3 of the time.

    And so forth

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    6/21

    Expected Value of PerfectInformation (EVPI)

    The expected value of perfectinformation (EVPI) is the gain in

    value from knowing for sure whichstate of nature will occur when,versus only knowing theprobabilities.

    It is the upper bound on the value ofany additional information.

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    7/21

    Calculating the EVPI

    -$100

    -$150-$100$150$200$250

    $60-$200 -$600

    $100 $200 $300 $0

    S1Lg Rise

    S2Sm Rise

    S3No Chg.

    S4Sm Fall

    S5Lg Fall

    D1: Gold

    D2: Bond

    D3: StockD4: C/D $60

    $500$60 $60$60

    $250 $100

    .2 .3 .3 .1 .1Probability

    Expected Return With Perfect Information(ERPI) =

    .2(500) + .3(250) + .3(200) + .1(300) + .1(60) = $271Expected Return With No Additional Information =

    EV(Bond) = $130

    Expected Value Of Perfect Information(EVPI) =

    ERPI - EV(Bond) = $271 - $130 = $141

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    8/21

    Using the Decision Template

    Enter

    Probabilities

    Expected Value Decision

    EVPI

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    9/21

    Sample Information

    One never really has perfect information,

    but can gather additional information, getexpert advice, etc. that can indicate whichstate of nature is likely to occur each time.

    The states of nature still occur, in the longrun with P(S1) = .2, P(S2) = .3, P(S3) = .3,P(S4) = .1, P(S5) = .1.

    We need a strategy of what to do given eachpossibility of the indicator information

    We want to know the value of this sample

    information (EVSI).

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    10/21

    Sample Information Approach

    Given the outcome of the sampleinformation, we revise the probabilities ofthe states of nature occurring (using

    Bayesian analysis). Then we repeat the expected value

    approach (using these revised

    probabilities) to see which decision isoptimal given each possible value of thesample information.

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    11/21

    Example -- Samuelman Forecast

    Noted economist Milton Samuelman gives

    an economic forecast indicating eitherPositive or Negative economic growth in thecoming year.

    Using a relative frequency approach basedon past data it has been observed:

    P(Positive|large rise) = .8 P(Negative|large rise) = .2

    P(Positive|small rise) = .7 P(Negative|small rise) = .3P(Positive|no change)= .5 P(Negative|no change)= .5

    P(Positive|small fall) = .4 P(Negative|small fall) = .6

    P(Positive|large fall) = 0 P(Negative|large fall) = 1

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    12/21

    Bayesian ProbabilitiesGiven a Positive Forecast

    Prob(Positive) = P(Positive and Large Rise) +

    P(Positive and Small Rise) +

    P(Positive and No Change) +

    P(Positive and Small Fall) +

    P(Positive and Large Fall)

    Prob(Positive) = P(Positive|Large Rise)P(Large Rise) +

    P(Positive|Small Rise) P(Small Rise) +

    P(Positive|No Change)P(No Change) +

    P(Positive|Small Fall) P(Small Fall) +

    P(Positive|Large Fall) P(Large Fall)

    (.80) (.20)

    (.70) (.30)

    (.30)(.40) (.10)(0) (.10) = .56

    P(Large Rise|Pos) = P(Pos|Lg. Rise)P(Lg. Rise)/P(Pos)

    P(Small Rise|Pos) = P(Pos|Sm. Rise)P(Sm. Rise)/P(Pos)

    P(No Change|Pos) = P(Pos|No Chg.)P(No Chg.)/P(Pos)

    P(Small Fall|Pos) = P(Pos|Sm. Fall)P(Sm. Fall)/P(Pos)

    P(Large Fall|Pos) = P(Pos|Lg. Fall)P(Lg. Fall)/P(Pos)

    (.80) (.20) /.56 = .286(.70) (.30) /.56 = .375

    (.50) (.30) /.56 = .268

    (.40) (.10) /.56 = .071

    (0) (.10) /.56 = 0

    (.50)

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    13/21

    Best Decision With PositiveForecast

    -$100

    -$150-$100$150$200$250

    $60

    -$200 -$600

    $100 $200 $300 $0

    S1

    Lg Rise

    S2

    Sm Rise

    S3

    No Chg.

    S4

    Sm Fall

    S5

    Lg Fall

    D1: Gold

    D2: Bond

    D3: Stock

    D4: C/D $60

    $500

    $60 $60$60

    $250 $100

    .286 .375 .268 .071 0

    Revised

    Probability

    Expected Value

    $84

    $180

    $249

    $60

    H ighest With Positive Forecast -- Choose D3 - Stock

    When Samuelman predicts positive-- Choose the Stock!

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    14/21

    Bayesian ProbabilitiesGiven a Negative Forecast

    Prob(Negative) = P(Negative and Large Rise) +

    P(Negative and Small Rise) +

    P(Negative and No Change) +

    P(Negative and Small Fall) +

    P(Negative and Large Fall)

    Prob(Negative) = P(Negative|Large Rise)P(Large Rise) +

    P(Negative|Small Rise) P(Small Rise) +

    P(Negative|No Change)P(No Change) +

    P(Negative|Small Fall) P(Small Fall) +

    P(Negative|Large Fall) P(Large Fall)

    (.20) (.20)

    (.30) (.30)

    (.30)(.60) (.10)(1) (.10) = .44

    P(Large Rise|Neg) = P(Neg|Lg. Rise)P(Lg. Rise)/P(Neg)

    P(Small Rise|Neg) = P(Neg|Sm. Rise)P(Sm. Rise)/P(Neg)

    P(No Change|Neg) = P(Neg|No Chg.)P(No Chg.)/P(Neg)

    P(Small Fall|Neg) = P(Neg|Sm. Fall)P(Sm. Fall)/P(Neg)

    P(Large Fall|Neg) = P(Neg|Lg. Fall)P(Lg. Fall)/P(Neg)

    (.20) (.20) /.44 = .091(.30) (.30) /.44 = .205

    (.50) (.30) /.44 = .341

    (.60) (.10) /.44 = .136

    (1) (.10) /.44 = .227

    (.50)

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    15/21

    Best Decision With NegativeForecast

    -$100

    -$150-$100$150$200$250

    $60

    -$200 -$600

    $100 $200 $300 $0

    S1

    Lg Rise

    S2

    Sm Rise

    S3

    No Chg.

    S4

    Sm Fall

    S5

    Lg Fall

    D1: Gold

    D2: Bond

    D3: Stock

    D4: C/D $60

    $500

    $60 $60$60

    $250 $100

    .091 .205 .341 .136 .227

    Revised

    Probability

    Expected Value

    $120

    $ 67

    -$33

    $60

    H ighest With Negative Forecast -- Choose D1 - Gold

    When Samuelman predicts negative-- Choose Gold!

    St t With S l

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    16/21

    Strategy With SampleInformation

    If the Samuelman Report is Positive --Choose the stock!

    If the Samuelman Report is Negative --

    Choose the gold!

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    17/21

    Expected Value of SampleInformation (EVSI)

    Recall, P(Positive) = .56 P(Negative) = .44

    When positive -- choose Stock with EV = $249

    When negative -- choose Gold with EV = $120

    Expected Return With Sample Information(ERSI) =

    .56(249) + .44(120) = $192.50Expected Return With No Additional Information =

    EV(Bond) = $130

    Expected Value Of Sample Information(EVSI) =

    ERSI - EV(Bond) = $192.50 - $130 = $62.50

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    18/21

    Efficiency

    Efficiency is a measure of the value of thesample information as compared to thetheoretical perfect information.

    It is a number between 0 and 1 given by:Efficiency = EVSI/EVPI

    For the Jones Investment Model:

    Efficiency = 62.50/141 = .44

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    19/21

    Using the Decision Template

    Bayesian Worksheet

    Results on Posterior Worksheet

    Enter Conditional Probabilities

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    20/21

    Output -- Posterior Analysis

    Indicator ProbabilitiesRevised Probabilities

    Optimal Strategy

    EVSI, EVPI, Efficiency

  • 7/27/2019 Decisions -- Under Risk

    21/21

    Review

    Expected Value Approach toDecision Making Under Risk

    EVPI

    Sample Information Bayesian Revision of Probabilities

    P(Indicator Information)

    Strategy EVSI

    Efficiency

    Use of Decision Template