writing in science engaging in explanation and argument from evidence

66
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014

Upload: helen-thomas

Post on 02-Jan-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence. Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014. NGSS Practices. Ask questions and define solutions Develop and use models Plan and carry out investigations Analyze and interpret data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference

Summer 2014

Page 2: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

• Ask questions and define solutions• Develop and use models• Plan and carry out investigations• Analyze and interpret data• Use math and computational thinking• Construct explanations and design

solutions• Engage in argument from evidence• Obtaining, evaluating, and

communicating information

Page 3: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

• Identify the role of explanation and argument in building science literacy in the classroom.

• Identify the progressions of explanation and argument K-12.

• Identify the challenges and scaffolding to support student construction of explanations and arguments in the classroom.

• Review student work to identify levels of student response in constructing explanations and arguments.

Page 4: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

In science, the production of knowledge is dependent on a process of reasoning from evidence that requires a scientist to justify a claim about the world. (explanation)

In response, other scientists attempt to identify the claim’s weaknesses and limitations to obtain the best possible explanation. (argument)

Page 5: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 6: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

What do you think will be the hardest about incorporating explanation into your instruction?

A.Finding places in the curriculum where it would make sense to include it.

B.Developing questions that focus students on using evidence to construct explanations.

C.Supporting students in classroom discussion.

D.Supporting students in writing explanations or constructing solutions.

Page 7: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Asking students to demonstrate their own understanding of the implications of a scientific ideas by developing their own explanations of phenomena, whether based on observations they have made or models and designs they have developed, engages them in an essential part of the process by which conceptual change can occur.

NGSS Appendix F

Page 8: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 9: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Writing TaskExplain how change to the biological component of the Everglades ecosystem by the Burmese Python affected the populations of native animals. Use evidence from the text to support your answer.

Page 10: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

What components you would expect to see in a student response in the writing task for explanation?

Page 11: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 12: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 13: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

“An explanation includes a claim that relates how a variable(s) relates to another variable or set of variables. A claim is often made in response to a question and in the process of answering the question, scientists often design investigations to generate data.” Explanations rely on evidence and provide the “how” or “why” phenomena occur (reasoning) .

NGSS Appendix F

Page 14: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Claim

Reasoning

Evidence

Page 15: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Claim A conclusion that answers the

question about a phenomena or a solution to a problem.

A statement of what you understand or a conclusion that you have reached from an investigation(s) or text(s) you have read.

Page 16: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Evidence Scientific data that supports the student’s claim.• Must be appropriate and sufficient • Can come from an investigation or other source

that may include Observations Information found in texts Archived data Information from an expert

Page 17: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Scientific Reasoning Justification that links the

claim and evidence.Shows why the data counts

as evidence to support the claim, using appropriate scientific principles.

Page 18: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 19: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 20: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Review the student explanation examples for the Invasive Pythons article and task.

Evaluate examples using the Criteria for the Components of an Explanation.

Page 21: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 22: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 23: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Identify elements of C-E-R Framework in the NGSS Practice of Explanation.

Identify the developmental progression in explanation from the K-1 grade band to 9-12 grade band.

Page 24: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 25: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

http://standards.nsta.org/DisplayStandard.aspx?view=topic&id=31

Page 26: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Compare the writing standard for explanation in MCC-R Standards for Literacy in Science/Technical Subjects to the Practice of Explanation in NGSS.

What are the implication for explanation in the science classroom when considering MCC_R Standards and NGSS?

Page 27: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Elementary 4: Use evidence to construct an explanation relating the speed of an object to the energy of that object.

Middle: Construct a scientific explanation based on evidence from rock strata for how the geologic time scale is used to organize Earth’s 4.6 billion-year-old-history.

High: Use mathematical representations to support a claim regarding relationships among the frequency wavelength, and speed of waves traveling in various media.

NGSS Core Ideas – Performance Expectations

Page 28: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 29: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

….one challenge across all the science investigations was students’ ability to make sense of data and construct scientific explanations in which they justified their claims. Students were engaged in the investigations, but is was the meaning-making piece after the investigations that was challenging.

Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science, McNeill and Krajcik

Page 30: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Using evidence to support their ideas relies on their own opinions has difficulty using sufficient evidence Explaining why the evidence supports their

ideas (justification/reasoning) has difficulty articulating this link and/or using scientific principles Considering multiple explanations or

solutions has difficulty revising explanations and solutions

based on evidence or scientific knowledge.

Page 31: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 32: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Explicitly define the elements of the C-E-R Framework

Provide an organizer

Connect to everyday examples

Provide opportunities for oral discourse of claim, evidence and reasoning before writing

Use teacher questioning or feedback during oral presentation

Model and critique examples

Engage students in peer critique

Provide students with feedback

Page 33: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Writing Task:

Explain how change to the biological component of the Everglades ecosystem by the Burmese Python affected populations. Use evidence from the text to support your answer.

Practices:Construct explanations

Page 34: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

As students use models to analyze and interpret data, organizers can be used to compile information to be used for explanation.

Page 35: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Discuss the predator-prey relationship below with your group.

Page 36: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Supports understanding of scientific content

Supports 21st Century skills Requires evidence to support claims Involves logical reasoning Models key practices of scientists and

engineers Supports the understanding of the

Nature of ScienceTaking Science to SchoolSupporting Grades 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanation.

Page 37: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 38: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

What do you think will be the most challenging about incorporating argumentation into your instruction?

A.Students use evidence to support argument.

B.Students providing alternative explanations.

C.Students being respectful of other students’ ideas.

D.Supporting student development of writing arguments.

Page 39: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

An argument is the process of defending those explanations by carefully ruling out other alternative explanations and building the case that the data collected is sufficient and appropriate to serve as evidence.

Page 40: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

In science, the production of knowledge is dependent on a process of reasoning from evidence that requires a scientist to justify a claim about the world. In response, other scientists attempt to identify the claim’s weakness and limitations to obtain the best possible explanation.

Page 41: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Scientists engage in argument to

defend claims using evidence and reasoningdefend models using evidencecritique the claims of other scientists.

Page 42: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

ExplanationMake sense of how or why a phenomenon

occurred. Explain why the biodiversity decreased. Explain the design process used to test a solution for reducing

the impacts of human activities on biodiversity.

ArgumentDefend or support knowledge claims through evidence and reasoning Argue for your explanation for why the biodiversity decreased. Argue for your experimental design to study the patterns in

biodiversity.

Page 43: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 44: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Student Oral

Discourse

Arguments made by others•Written•Videos

StudentWritten Argument

Page 45: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 46: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 47: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 48: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 49: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Evaluate examples of student work using the Argument Framework. Identify the elements of the argument. ClaimsEvidenceCounterclaimsRebuttal

Page 50: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Middle School Construct , use, and present arguments to

support the claim that when the motion energy of an object changes, energy is transferred to or from the object.

(MS-PS3-5)

High School Construct an argument based on evidence

about the simultaneous coevolution of Earth’s systems and life on Earth (HS-ESS2-7

Page 51: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 52: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 53: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

How does argument progress K-12?

What are the different ways students are expected to interact with arguments to strengthen their understanding of core ideas or the design process?

Page 54: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Greater Sophistication

Page 55: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Construct a scientific argument showing how data support a claim.

Identify possible weaknesses in scientific arguments, appropriate to the students’ level of knowledge, and discuss them using reasoning and evidence.

Identify flaws in their own arguments and modify and improve them in response to criticism.

Recognize the major features of scientific arguments.

Read media reports of science or technology in a critical manner so as to identify their strengths and weaknesses.

Page 56: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 57: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

How do the Standards for Argument in Literacy support the Practice of Argument in NGSS?

How are they different?

What are the implications for classroom instruction?

Page 58: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 59: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Using evidence to support ideas Relies on own opinion Difficulty using sufficient or appropriate evidence

Explaining why their evidence supports their ideas (Reasoning)

Can have difficulty articulating link between evidence and claim

Can have difficulty articulating link between ideas, evidence and scientific principles

Considering alternative claims Can focus on one idea Ownership of own idea

Taking into consideration viewpoints of others

Page 60: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 61: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Build a strong foundation for explanation first (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning) Make the Argument Framework explicit Provide examples and models

Include debate or oral discourse (thinking made visible) before independent writing.

Provide various scaffolds

Provide opportunities to critique arguments of others

Provide feedback (teacher and peer critique) for rewrite

Page 62: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Supports student’s understanding of disciplinary core ideas of science and cross cutting themes.

Using evidence to construct and critique explanations/ arguments is a 21st century skill that can be used across disciplines and outside of the school setting.

Promotes literacy development.

Helps students build an understanding of the nature of science.

Allows students to critically examine claims made in the media.

Page 63: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 64: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence
Page 65: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Write 3 – 5 “power words” to summarize your understanding of

ExplanationArgument

Page 66: Writing in Science Engaging in Explanation and Argument from Evidence

Identified the role of explanation and argument in building science literacy in the classroom.

Discussed the progressions of explanation and arguments K-12.

Identified the challenges and scaffolding to support student construction of explanations and arguments in the classroom.

Reviewed student work to identify levels of student response in constructing explanations and arguments.