when did plate tectonics start?archenv.geo.uu.nl/pdf/van_hunen_early_geodynamics.pdf · today’s...
TRANSCRIPT
Archaean geodynamics
Jeroen van HunenDurham University, UK
Thanks to: Jon DavidsonTaras GeryaArie van den Berg
In this talk
Cooling history of the EarthArchaean tectonic stylesArchaean mantle dynamicsPossible links with surface processes
Today’s dynamics of the solid Earth
Plate tectonics dominate dynamicsMantle plumes origin at CMBWhole-mantle convectionCore dynamics magnetic fieldDespite radiogenic heating the Earth cools down
What was different in the past?
2)
was 100-300
K hotter
Archaean mantle: 1)
Produced 3 x as
much radiogenic heat
today
early Earth?
Secular changes in mantle temperature
Significantly hotter mantle
Archean
mantle was 100-300 K hotter
Significantly hotter Archeanmantle
(Nisbet
et al., 1993,
Abbott et al., 1994)
Wet, slightly hotter Archean
mantle
(Grove and Parman, 2004)
today
early Earth?
Consequences of more radiogenic heatToday’s surface heat flux of 80 mW/m2:
50% = from radiogenic heat production50% = Earth cooling
To have Earth coolingin Archaean, we needa cooling mechanismmore efficient than plate tectonics (PT)
(Sleep, 2000; Turcotte
and Schubert, 2002)
today
early
Earth?
Consequences of a hotter mantle
1.
Weaker plate and mantle material:η = exp (T)~1 order of magnitude for every 100 K
2.
More melting at mid-ocean ridges thicker oceanic crust:
(van Thienen
& al., 2004)
Consequences of more meltingmore meltingthicker crust + harzburgitelower average density ρless slab pullno subduction? (e.g. today Ontong Java)NO PLATE TECTONICS?
very low ρ
low ρlow ρ
very low ρ
normal ρnormal ρ
lithosphere
today Archean
crustharzburgite
peridotite
Effect of basalt-eclogite transition
Thick basaltic crust cannot subductBasalt transforms
to eclogite
below40 km depthThis does help
subduction somewhat, but enough?
(Cloos, 1993)
No subduction
Subduction
density basaltic crust
density eclogitic crust
Computer model simulations
ΔTmantle
= 0oC 100oC 200oC 300oC
colors =
viscosity
black =
basalt
white =
eclogite
viscosity
time
(van Hunen & van den Berg, 2008)
Computer model simulations
colors =
viscosity
black =
basalt
white =
eclogite
time
(van Hunen & van den Berg, 2008)
viscosity
For low Tmantle subduction looks like today’s
Computer model simulations
colors =
viscosity
black =
basalt
white =
eclogite
time
(van Hunen & van den Berg, 2008)
viscosity
For higher Tmantle frequent slab break-off occurs …
Computer model simulations
colors =
viscosity
black =
basalt
white =
eclogite
time
(van Hunen & van den Berg, 2008)
viscosity
… or subduction completely stops.
Are these subduction velocities enough to cool early Earth?
Summary of many model calculations
1
32
Are these subduction velocities enough to cool early Earth?
Possible parameterizations of vsubd
Model 1: subduction for all TmFlat vsubd rate:
cooling since early ArcheanCooling curve similar to Korenaga,’06
and Labrosse & Jaupart,’07.
Increasing vsubd
with Tpot
:‘Thermal catastrophe’
Model 2: Rapid plate tectonics efficient cooling thermal catastrophe
Peak in vsubd
: Recent rapid cooling since Proterozoic
Model 3: Inefficient subduction hotter Archaean mantle
Observational evidence for Archaean PT
Seismic reflectors
Ophiolites
(?)
(Calvert et al., 1995; Furnes et al., 2007)
Paleo-latitudes of old continents varied over timeOnly during supercontinent (formation/breakup)Episodic plate
tectonics?Data sparse!
(O’Neill et al., 2007; Silver and Behn, 2008)
Observational evidence for Archaean PTPaleo-magnetism
(Modern) PT absent in Archaean?
(Stern, 2008)
Missing key characteristics of PT
Alternative tectonics: models and requirements
Possible models:Magma oceanStagnant lid convection
Any model should be dynamically feasible:Based on graviational instabilityForces / stresses should be sufficient to drive the type of tectonics
.. and should provide a cooling mechanism for the Earth:Surface heat flow at least that of PT?
Crustal delaminationDiapir tectonicsPlume tectonics
…
Alternative tectonics: diapir/delamination tectonics
(Zegers
and van Keken, 2001; van Thienen
et al., 2004, 2005)
Mechanism:Crust built by eruptionsDeepest crust transforms to dense eclogites: delaminatesDownwellings melting TTG formation
Abundant melting releases latentheat
Alternative tectonics: diapir/delamination tectonics
(Zegers
and van Keken, 2001; van Thienen
et al., 2004, 2005)
Why this model?Explains ovoid extrusions (e.g. Pilbara)No need for PT before late Archaean or ProterozoicEfficient cooling mechanism
(van Hunen and van den Berg, 2008)
frequent slab break-off
modern subduction style
Absence of UHPM by slab break-off?
Did style of PT change over time?
Today Archean
subduction ofcontinental crustgives UHPM
no subductionof continental crust: absenceof UHPM
UHPM
UHPM
Absence of UHPM by slab break-off?
(USGS website; Wortel
and Spakman, 2000; van Hunen and van den Berg, 2008)
Did style of PT change over time?
(e.g. Abbott et al., 1994; van Hunen et al., 2004)
Evolution from flat to steep subduction?No, because:
1.
If too buoyant, slabs won’t subduct
at all2.
A hot, weak mantle is unable to support flat subduction
Did style of PT change over time?Bulk continental crust:
Today: andesitesFormed in subduction zoneMantle wedge hydration and -melting
Archaean: tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTGs)(slab?) melting of mafic crust (Similarities with adakites?)Interaction with a mantle wedge?
Suggested formation scenarios:
(e.g. Foley et al., 2002, 2003; Bédard, 2006)
Archaean mantle dynamicsEpisodic continental crust formation
(McCulloch and Bennett, 1994)
Archaean mantle dynamicsRole of the mantle in tectonics style
Geochemical ↔ geodynamical viewpoint:Seismic tomography shows whole-mantle convectionOIB/MORB basalt chemistry requires district, separate reservoirs
(van der
Hilst, 2007)
Archaean mantle dynamics
Mantle spinel perovskite phase transition endothermic: hampers vertical flowTransition from layered to whole mantle convection?Major avalanches during transition period?
(Tackley, 1996; Davies, website, ANU)
Melting by episodic mantle avalanches?Sudden warming of upper mantle may give:
Wide-spread (re-)melting new continental crustUnfavourable PT conditions: intermittent PT?
(Davies, 1995)
Alternative models for episodic mantle behaviour and crust formation
‘Stick-slip’ plate tectonics
Mush ocean – plate tectonics alternation
(O’Neill et al., 2007; Sleep, 2000, 2006)
Role of mantle plumes
Archaean plumes (much) hotterPlumes (probably) form at the core-mantle boundary Plume size ~ ΔTWithout D’’-layer plumes larger?Plumes cool Earth’s core drive core dynamics
magnetic field shielding life on Earth
T
z
CORE
MANTLED’’
ΔT
Mantle degassing pulses
Crust formation pulses
Mantle degassing pulses
Influence on ocean/atmosphere composition and climate?
(data from Condie, 1998; Farquhar et al., 2000; Parman, 2007; Grocke
et al., in prep.)
Links with the hydrosphere: water budgetToday: regassing > degassingEarly Earth:
Subduction rates? More volcanism more degassingHotter mantle faster slab dehydration less regassing?
(Wallmann, 2001; Rüpke
et al., 2004)
Archaean sea level and emerged continentsConstant continental freeboard (±200 m)Very early ocean presentContinental growth model (?)
ΔT < 110-210 K unless orogenieswere weaker2-3% late
Archaean continent emergence
‘Archaean water world’
(Harrison et al., 2005; Flament
et al., 2008)
1300 1350 1400 1450 1500T(oC)
0
25
42
% c
ontin
enta
l are
a
Archaean plate tectonics seems viable, but probably looked different:
No Archaean UHPM/blueschistsWeaker plates, more break-offDifferent continental crust Less regassing
However, …No widespread shallow flat subductionPlate speed higher/lower?
Alternative or additional tectonics possible / required: diapir/plume/delamination dynamics
Conclusions
Archaean Present
ConclusionsEpisodic mantle dynamics / plate tectonics (?) / crust formation:
As evidenced by crustal record, mantle geochemistry
Expected from dynamic modelling
Influence on:De/regassing rates?
Ocean size / sea level?
Ocean / atmosphere
composition?
Thank you.