views of animal phylogeny

18
Views of Animal Phylogeny

Upload: dacian

Post on 09-Feb-2016

24 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Views of Animal Phylogeny. Ernst Haeckel. Nielsen (2001). Brusca and Brusca (2003). Halanych (2004). recent. traditional. Edgecomb et al. (2011). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Views of Animal Phylogeny

Page 2: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Ernst Heinrich Phillipp August Haeckel (1834-1919; Germany)

Page 3: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Hyman 1951

Libbie Hyman1888-1969University of Chicago

Page 4: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Margulis and Schwartz 1987

Lynn Margulis1938-2011U Mass Amherst

Page 5: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Nielsen (2001)

Claus Nielsen, Denmark

Page 6: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Richard C. Brusca (University of Arizona) and Gary J. Brusca (Humboldt State University)

2003

Page 7: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Kenneth M. Halanych (2004)Auburn

traditional recent

Page 8: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Greg Edgecomb et al. (2011)

Natural History Museum, London

Page 9: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Tree produced by maximum-likelihood analysis of the EST Set. The tree was produced from a matrix consisting of 242 genes and 104,840 amino acid characters.

J F Ryan et al. Science 2013;342:1242592

Published by AAAS

Joseph Ryan, Whitney Lab, University of Florida

Page 10: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Hypotheses of deepest branches in the animal tree

Page 11: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Jekely et al. 2015

Gaspar JekelyMax Planck InstituteFor DevelopmentalBiology, Tübingen,Germany

Page 12: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Fig. 3 Idealized three-dimensional models of Cambrian skeletonized ctenophores.

Qiang Ou et al. Sci Adv 2015;1:e1500092

Published by AAAS

Qiang OuUniversity of GeoscienceBeijing, China

Page 13: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Fig. 4 Phylogenetic relationship of fossil and extant ctenophores based on a comprehensive cladistic analysis (tables S2 and S3).

Qiang Ou et al. Sci Adv 2015;1:e1500092

Published by AAAS

Page 14: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Max TelfordUniversity College London

Telford et al. 2015

Page 15: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Pisani et al. 2015

Davide Pisani,University of Bristol

Page 16: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Whelan et al. 2015

Nathan WhelanAuburn University

Page 17: Views of Animal Phylogeny

Xiao and Laflamme (2009)

Modular Ediacara fossils. (A) Three incomplete specimens of the erniettomorph fossil Pteridiniumcomposed of tubular modular units. (B) Pteridinium with nine modular units (right side of fossil). (C) Erniettomorph Ernietta with module infilling. (D) Magnified section of the specimen in the boxed section in C, with arrows highlighting sediment infill. (E) Rangeomorph fossil Rangea with fractal modules (bracket on the right). (F) Rangea with three primary fractal modules (large modules on the left) and three smaller subsidiary modules tucked in between the larger modules. (G) Rangeomorph Fractofususwith 16 fractal modules on either side of the longitudinal midline. Bracket displaying one module. G is provided by G.M. Narbonne. (Scale bar: 1 cm.)

Shuhai Xiao, Virginia TechMarc LaFlamme, University of Toronto

Page 18: Views of Animal Phylogeny