views of animal phylogeny
DESCRIPTION
Views of Animal Phylogeny. Ernst Haeckel. Nielsen (2001). Brusca and Brusca (2003). Halanych (2004). recent. traditional. Edgecomb et al. (2011). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Views of Animal Phylogeny
Ernst Heinrich Phillipp August Haeckel (1834-1919; Germany)
Hyman 1951
Libbie Hyman1888-1969University of Chicago
Margulis and Schwartz 1987
Lynn Margulis1938-2011U Mass Amherst
Nielsen (2001)
Claus Nielsen, Denmark
Richard C. Brusca (University of Arizona) and Gary J. Brusca (Humboldt State University)
2003
Kenneth M. Halanych (2004)Auburn
traditional recent
Greg Edgecomb et al. (2011)
Natural History Museum, London
Tree produced by maximum-likelihood analysis of the EST Set. The tree was produced from a matrix consisting of 242 genes and 104,840 amino acid characters.
J F Ryan et al. Science 2013;342:1242592
Published by AAAS
Joseph Ryan, Whitney Lab, University of Florida
Hypotheses of deepest branches in the animal tree
Jekely et al. 2015
Gaspar JekelyMax Planck InstituteFor DevelopmentalBiology, Tübingen,Germany
Fig. 3 Idealized three-dimensional models of Cambrian skeletonized ctenophores.
Qiang Ou et al. Sci Adv 2015;1:e1500092
Published by AAAS
Qiang OuUniversity of GeoscienceBeijing, China
Fig. 4 Phylogenetic relationship of fossil and extant ctenophores based on a comprehensive cladistic analysis (tables S2 and S3).
Qiang Ou et al. Sci Adv 2015;1:e1500092
Published by AAAS
Max TelfordUniversity College London
Telford et al. 2015
Pisani et al. 2015
Davide Pisani,University of Bristol
Whelan et al. 2015
Nathan WhelanAuburn University
Xiao and Laflamme (2009)
Modular Ediacara fossils. (A) Three incomplete specimens of the erniettomorph fossil Pteridiniumcomposed of tubular modular units. (B) Pteridinium with nine modular units (right side of fossil). (C) Erniettomorph Ernietta with module infilling. (D) Magnified section of the specimen in the boxed section in C, with arrows highlighting sediment infill. (E) Rangeomorph fossil Rangea with fractal modules (bracket on the right). (F) Rangea with three primary fractal modules (large modules on the left) and three smaller subsidiary modules tucked in between the larger modules. (G) Rangeomorph Fractofususwith 16 fractal modules on either side of the longitudinal midline. Bracket displaying one module. G is provided by G.M. Narbonne. (Scale bar: 1 cm.)
Shuhai Xiao, Virginia TechMarc LaFlamme, University of Toronto