us airline competition and...
TRANSCRIPT
US Airline Competition and Consolidation 2010P t P B l b b
0
Peter P. Belobaba
November 4, 2010
i li d fUS Airline Industry Performance
• Review: A roller‐coaster decade 2000‐09Review: A roller coaster decade 2000 09– Rapid growth of LCCs and intense fare competition
– Restructuring, cost cutting and productivity improvements
– After $40 billion in losses a brief return to profits 2006‐07
– Fuel shock and financial meltdown in 2008
• Return to profitability in 2010 and beyond– How much room to cut cost or improve productivity?p p y
– Can capacity discipline be maintained?
– Have LCCs reached their peak in US domestic markets?
1
US Industry Profits in 2006‐2007 after $40B of LossesUS Industry Profits in 2006 2007 after $40B of Losses 2001‐2005; More Losses in 2008 and 2009
$20,000
$25,000
$10,000
$15,000
$0
$5,000
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
000
001
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
Milli
ons)
Oper ProfitN t P fit
$
($10,000)
($5,000) 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
(USD
M Net Profit
($25,000)
($20,000)
($15,000)
Source: ATA data($30,000)
($25,000)
2
US C i Fi i l R lt 2009US Carrier Financial Results 2009
Source: Airline Business, March 20103
US C i C l ti N t I Q1 Q3 2010US Carriers Cumulative Net Income Q1‐Q3 2010800
400
600
200
400
Millions
Net Profit
200
0
USD
M Net Profit
‐400
‐200
‐600Source: Airline Business
4
US C i RPM T ffi Sh 2009US Carrier RPM Traffic Share 2009
26.0%
30%
19.4%20%
25%
16.0%
12.7%11.8%
15%
9.2%
4.1%3 0% 2 9%
5%
10%
3.0% 2.9% 2.8%2.0%
1.3%
0%
Source: Aviation Daily, 1/21/2010 5
d i liUS Legacy and Low Cost Airlines
Network Legacy Carriers Low Cost CarriersNetwork Legacy Carriers
AA – American Airlines
Low Cost Carriers
WN – Southwest Airlines
UA – United Air Lines
DL – Delta Air Lines (incl. NW)
B6 – JetBlue Airways
FL – AirTran Airways
CO – Continental Airlines
US – US Airways (incl. HP)
F9 – Frontier Airlines
VX – Virgin America
• Legacy group carried 67% of total US airline traffic in 2009.
• These airlines carried another 17% of total US traffic (RPMs).
U it C t ( l “T t R l t d”) S ik d i 2008Unit Costs (excl. “Transport Related”) Spiked in 2008
CASM Ex Transport ($/ASM)
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.09
0.10
0.11
/ASM `
0.06
0.07
0.08
$/
0.05
0.06
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
NLC LCC
7
Non‐Labor Unit Cost Difference Still About 1 CentNon Labor Unit Cost Difference Still About 1 CentThe “Structural Gap”
CASM Non labor ($/ASM)
0.050
0.055
CASM Non-labor ($/ASM)
0.040
0.045
/ASM `
0.025
0.030
0.035$/A
0.0201995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
NLC LCC
8
NLC LCC
L b U it C t I i A i f B th S tLabor Unit Costs Increasing Again for Both Sectors
CASM Labor ($/ASM)
0.045
0.050
C S abo ($/ S )
0.035
0.040
AS
M
0.025
0.030
$/A
0.0201995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
NLC LCC
9
NLC LCC
Ai ft Utili ti D d i 2008 d 2009Aircraft Utilization Decreased in 2008 and 2009
12.0
10 5
11.0
11.5
ircr
aft
Day
9.5
10.0
10.5
Hou
rs p
er A
i
8.5
9.0
9.5
Blo
ck-H
8.01996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
NLC LCCNLC LCC
10
LCC E l P d ti it Still 15% Hi h th NLCLCC Employee Productivity Still 15% Higher than NLCs
3,100,000
2,700,000
2,900,000
yee
2 100 000
2,300,000
2,500,000
M p
er E
mpo
ly
1,700,000
1,900,000
2,100,000
AS
M
1,500,0001999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
NLC LCC
11
G i S l i /B fi E l Di d i 2006Gap in Salaries/Benefits per Employee Disappeared in 2006
100,000
70 000
80,000
90,000
,
e
50,000
60,000
70,000
per
Em
plo
yee
20,000
30,000
40,000
US
D p
0
10,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
NLC LCC
12
US D ti T ffi d C it G th b YUS Domestic Traffic and Capacity Growth by Year
8 0
10.0
4 0
6.0
8.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
Traffic (RPM)
(4.0)
(2.0)
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Capacity (ASM)
(8.0)
(6.0)
(10.0)
Source: Air Transport Association13
Domestic Mainline Carrier Capacity Down 28% Since 2000;Domestic Mainline Carrier Capacity Down 28% Since 2000; Total Domestic ASMs Still 16% Lower
llion
s
600
650
tic ASM
s in M
i
550
US Dom
est
450
500
4002000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Mainline Domestic Capacity Regional Carrier Capacity
14
Mainline Domestic Capacity Regional Carrier Capacity
N t k C i H C t D ti C itNetwork Carriers Have Cut Domestic Capacity
15
LCC D ti C it H G B t L li OffLCC Domestic Capacity Has Grown, But Leveling Off
16
Regional Partners Carry An Increasing Proportion ofRegional Partners Carry An Increasing Proportion of Decreased Domestic Passenger Traffic
460
480
500
ons
400
420
440
RPMs in M
illio
320
340
360
380
Dom
estic
300
320
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Mainline Domestic Capacity Regional Carrier Capacity
17
Mainline Domestic Capacity Regional Carrier Capacity
Pre‐Downturn, Capacity Reduction Was Having aPre Downturn, Capacity Reduction Was Having a Positive Effect on Unit Revenue Measures
PRASM (¢) -- Domestic + Express
12 50
13.00
PRASM (¢) -- Domestic + Express12 Months Ended
11.50
12.00
12.50
10.00
10.50
11.00
9.00
9.50
-01
-02
-03
-04
-05
-06
-07
-08
-09
-10
18
Jan-
Jan-
Jan-
Jan-
Jan-
Jan-
Jan-
Jan-
Jan-
Jan-
Source: Air Transport Association
LCC C 1 i 3 US D ti PLCCs Carry 1 in 3 US Domestic Passengers
LCC Market Share is still growing but leveling off, reaching 34% of g g g gtotal US domestic passengers in 2008
19
LCC Sh f D ti RPM i A hi 25%LCC Share of Domestic RPMs is Approaching 25%
20
Domestic Market Concentration Virtually UnchangedDomestic Market Concentration Virtually UnchangedMerged Southwest Larger than Delta and United in Domestic Capacity
i h i hDomestic ASM ShareFirst Quarter 2000
Domestic ASM ShareSecond Quarter 2009
WN + FLDL WN FL18%16%
UACO + UA
17%
All Other49%
UA15%All Other
54%
NW + DL16%
AA15%
21Notes: Mainline only. Exludes Regional Operations.
Southwest’s Recent Growth Has OnlySouthwest s Recent Growth Has Only Been Into the Largest Markets
Largest Metro Areas Without Southwest ServiceAnchorage gg
Burlington
New York‐EWR/JFK/LGA
SyracuseMinneapolis
Pittsburgh
MilwaukeeGrandRapids
Rochester
Westchester Co.Toledo
Madison Flint
Eugene
South d
Burlington
Lansing X
XX
BostonXMilXwauee
DenverEWR/JFK/LGA
MemphisCharlotte
RichmondGreensboro
Akron
FresnoDayton
Knoxville
Bakersfield Wichita
Colorado Springs
Ft. WayneDes Moines
Monterey
SantaBarbara
MolineBend
CharlestonSan LouisObispo
Atlantic City
Springfield
XWashingtonXSan Francisco oX
Knoxville
Population 1 Million +
Atlanta
Memphis
Charleston
Greenville
Honolulu
Columbia
PensacolaGulfport
Barbara
Savannah
Myrtle Beach
Knoxville
22
Population 500,000 – 1 MillionPopulation Less Than 500,000 Sarasota
Tallahassee
Southwest has Increased Domestic Share through Growth inSouthwest has Increased Domestic Share through Growth in Capacity (ASM) Share at Below Average Load Factors
23
Southwest “Share Gap” Narrowed in 2009 – Due to ExtensiveSouthwest Share Gap Narrowed in 2009 Due to Extensive Marketing of No Ancillary Fees?
1 00
Southwest's Share Gap
0.50
1.00
SHARE GAP = RPM SHARE – ASM SHARE
0 50
0.00
‐1.00
‐0.50
‐1.50
‐2.002000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
24
f i d i li fi biliProspects for Sustained US Airline Profitability
• Exogenous forces remain the primary drivers of profit– Strong economic recovery is critical to the demand/revenue side– Fuel prices are climbing, continue to be the greatest wild card
C d d i i i h l l d ff d/ d• Cost and productivity gains have leveled off and/or reversed– Non‐fuel and especially labor unit costs increasing for NLCs and LCCs– Upcoming labor negotiations will be particularly difficult
• Return to profitability largely due to capacity management– Shifts by NLCs to international flying; lower domestic capacity overall
C lid ti th h i b th t– Consolidation through mergers in both sectors
• LCCs continue to grow in largest markets, albeit more slowly– Their 2011+ capacity decisions will greatly affect industry performance
25
Their 2011+ capacity decisions will greatly affect industry performance