two cultures 2010

35
"the further art advances the closer it approaches science, the further science advances the closer it approaches art." Buckminster Fuller, 1938 TWO CULTURES & Moving towards the THIRD CULTURE

Upload: artscicenter

Post on 10-May-2015

520 views

Category:

Education


7 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Two Cultures 2010

"the further art advances the closer it approaches science, the further science advances the closer it approaches art."

Buckminster Fuller, 1938

TWO CULTURES&

Moving towards the

THIRD CULTURE

Page 2: Two Cultures 2010

TOPICS:

• CP Snow’s lecture• Stereotypes• Evolution of Universities• Specialization• Economies of Culture• Paradigms• Methodologies• Frank Malina: Leonardo journal• Third Culture

Page 3: Two Cultures 2010

C.P. Snow said that these two statements should be equivalent: "I know what the Second Law of Thermodynamics is," and "I have read a play of Shakespeare's." You should be acquainted with both.

Page 4: Two Cultures 2010

The compilers of the Oxford English Dictionary recognised that this was a fairly recent development, with no example given before the 1860's: "We shall . . . use the word "science" in the sense which the Englishmen so commonly give it; as expressing physical and experimental science, to the exclusion of theological and metaphysical." (Snow, 1964 pg. xi)

William Whewell, a philosopher and historian of science who used 'science' in his Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences of 1840, is credited with establishing this term.

The first time it was recorded as an idea, however, was at theAssociation for the Advanced Science in the early 1830's when it was proposed as an analogy to the term 'artist.'

Page 5: Two Cultures 2010

STEREOTYPEste·reo·typ·i·cal /"ster-E-&-'tip-i-k&l/ also ste·reo·typ·ic /-ik/ adjective

Function: noun: something conforming to a fixed or general pattern; especially :

an often oversimplified or biased mental picture held to characterize the typical individual of a group —

A generalization, usually exaggerated or oversimplified and often offensive, that is used to describe or distinguish a group.

Page 6: Two Cultures 2010
Page 7: Two Cultures 2010
Page 8: Two Cultures 2010
Page 9: Two Cultures 2010
Page 10: Two Cultures 2010
Page 11: Two Cultures 2010
Page 12: Two Cultures 2010
Page 13: Two Cultures 2010
Page 14: Two Cultures 2010
Page 15: Two Cultures 2010
Page 16: Two Cultures 2010

Question:What is the one thing that these media stereotypes have in common?

Page 17: Two Cultures 2010
Page 18: Two Cultures 2010
Page 19: Two Cultures 2010

• EVOLUTION OF TEACHING INSTITUTIONS

Harvard University Chapel at Boston University

Page 20: Two Cultures 2010

Church at Yale University Lecture at Princeton University

Page 21: Two Cultures 2010

Harvard Library

Page 22: Two Cultures 2010

Art building at Yale University

Page 23: Two Cultures 2010

Broad Art Center, UCLADesigned by Richard Meier

Page 24: Two Cultures 2010

California Nanosystems Institute (CNSI), UCLADesigned by Rafael Vinoly

Page 25: Two Cultures 2010

• ECONOMY & CULTURE @ UCLA

Page 26: Two Cultures 2010

THIRD CULTURE – what is it?

Page 27: Two Cultures 2010

Thomas Kuhn - Paradigms

Page 28: Two Cultures 2010

Thomas Kuhn (1962)

Why should a change of paradigm be called a revolution? In the face of the vast and essential differences between political and scientific development, what parallelism can justify the metaphor that finds revolutions in both?

Page 29: Two Cultures 2010

Paradigm Shift

http://www.knowledgejump.com/knowledge/popper.html

Page 30: Two Cultures 2010

LEFT / RIGHT BRAIN

Page 31: Two Cultures 2010

“Science may be described as the art of systematic over-simplification.”

“Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one, take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory nor the problem which it was intended to solve”

Karl Popper (1966)FALSIFICATION

Page 32: Two Cultures 2010
Page 33: Two Cultures 2010

Twenty One Definitions of Paradigm: Anything Goes

• Science is an essentially anarchistic enterprise: theoretical anarchism is more humanitarian and more likely to encourage progress than its law-and-order alternatives.

• This is shown both by an examination of historical episodes and by an abstract analysis of the relation between idea and action. The only principle that does not inhibit progress is: anything goes.

Page 34: Two Cultures 2010

METHODOLOGY

• Against Method: Feyeraband

• "All Methodologies have their limitations and the only 'rule' that survives is 'anything goes.' (Feyerabend, 1975, pg. 296)

Page 35: Two Cultures 2010

Frank Malina

• Founded Leonardo journal, 1968