tqm through accreditation and institutional sustainability assessment

7/25/2019 TQM Through Accreditation and Institutional Sustainability Assessment

1/42

TQM ThroughAccreditation

and InstitutionalSustainabilityAssessment

Presented by:

DR. RENE M. !"!AR

A"# $ A"#%!A &oardMember


2/42

Objectives ofTertiary

Education /

Roles of HEIs

Accredi

-tation

Q A

ISA


3/42

1. To rovide a !eneral education ro!ra" t#at $ill

ro"ote national identity% cultural consciousness%

"oral inte!rity and siritual vi!or&

!b'ecti(es o) Tertiary

Education

'. To train t#e nation(s "ano$er in t#e s)ills re*uired fornational develo"ent&

+. To develo t#e rofessions t#at $ill rovide leaders#i

for t#e nation& and

,. To advance )no$led!e t#rou!# researc# $or) and

aly ne$ )no$led!e for i"rovin! t#e *uality of

#u"an life and resondin! effectively to c#an!in!

social needs and conditions.


4/42

1. Service to t#e nation by develoin! #u"an resources

$it# various tyes of )no$led!e& co"etencies% and

eertise% esecially in suort of t#e social%

econo"ic% and develo"ent needs of t#e #iliines

Roles o) *EIs

'. T#e "aintenance% develo"ent% and critical araisal

of cultural values

+. rearation of individuals to lay an active role in

society


5/42

+The ,uality o) a -ersons li)e is in

direct -ro-ortion to their commitmentto e/cellence0 regardless o) their

chosen 1eld o) endea(or.2

% 3INE "!M&ARDI %

+The only 4ay )or4ard0 i) 4e aregoin5 to im-ro(e the ,uality o)education0 is to get e(erybody

in(ol(ed.2

+Ensuring ,uality highereducation is one o) the most

im-ortant things 4e can do )or)uture generations.2

% R!N "E6IS %


6/42

What is QUALITY?

Quality in #i!#er education is oftendefined as fitness for urose%0 but it canbe also understood in ter"s oftransfor"ation0 of sta)e#olders% esecially

for "ature institutions Harvey 2 3reen%144+5.

6HE7 vie$s *uality as t#e ali!n"ent andconsistency of outco"es $it# t#einstitution(s vision-"ission and !oals%de"onstrated by learnin! and serviceoutco"es at ecetional levels and by as#ared culture of *uality.


7/42

Source: *ED Memorandum !rder No. 780Series o) 9;90 Article II: Quality Assurance

Q#A"IT> as +1tness )or -ur-ose2 is

generally used by international bodies

)or assessment and accreditation.

This -ers-ecti(e re,uires the

translation o) the institutions (ision0

mission0 and goals into learning

outcomes0 -rograms and systems?

The Quality Assurance


8/42


Q#A"IT> as +e/ce-tional2 means either

being distincti(e? e/ceeding (ery high

standards? or con)ormance to standards

based on a system o) com-arability using

criteria and ratings? the third characteristic

underlies *EDs de1nition o)

+e/ce-tional2? and



9/42


Q#A"IT> as +de(elo-ing a culture o)

,uality2 is the trans)ormational

dimension o) the *ED notion o)

,uality.



10/42

T*E !#T!MES%&ASEDED#ATI!N ANA">TIA"


11/42

T*E !#T!MES%&ASEDED#ATI!N ANA">TIA"


12/42

ARED

ITATI!

N


13/42

Accreditation De1ned and

ategoried

What is ACCREDITATION?

Accreditation may be defined as thereconition by an accreditin aency thatan ed!cationa" instit!tion or academic#roram meets a #re$estab"ished set ofstandards of %!a"ity&


14/42

6RITERIA

TE6H=IQ


15/42

' Accreditation is both aser(ice and a)!dement&

' Accreditation may beo(ernmenta"*com#!"sory+ or non$

o(ernmenta"*(o"!ntary+&


16/42

Rationale o) Accreditation

B An efective catalyst in improving andraising the standards o schools and

their academic programs.B Protects the public rom ill-prepared

graduates or incompetent proessionalsusually turned out rom the mills osubstandard or marginal educationinstitutions.


17/42

Benefts o Accreditation

Prestigetomemberinstitutio

ns

*el--arentsto =no44hich

-rogramthey may

sendtheir

childrento )or

,ualityeducation

Pro(idea4areness o)

standards o)

e/cellence to be

attained

To =no44hat tosu--ortand ho4

muchsu--ort

is needed)or

)unding

To =no4 a-rogramsstrength0

4ea=nesses0 and

areas o)de(elo-me

nt


18/42

Ty-es o) Accreditation

IN,TITUTIONAL *enera"+

- Considers the characteristics of theinstit!tion as a tota" o#eratin !nit&

> faculty-student-ersonnel

services

> educationalofferin!s

> instruction

> financial conditions

> ad"inistrative stren!t#

> co""unity outreac#


19/42

-RO.RA//ATIC *s#ecia"i0ed+

- 1oc!ses its attention on a

#artic!"ar #roram 2ithin theinstit!tion3 e(a"!atin it in de#th&


20/42

Instit!tiona" and#rorammatic accreditation

are com#"imentary&

I=STIT


21/42

3alues o) Accreditation

An ass!rance of e4terna" e(a"!ation ofthe instit!tion or #roram3 and afindin that there is conformity to

enera" e4#ectation in ed!cation or inthe #rofessiona" fie"d5

An identification of instit!tions and6or#rorams 2hich ha(e (o"!ntary!nderta7en e4#"icit acti(ities directed atim#ro(in the ed!cationa" %!a"ity ande4ce""ence of the instit!tion and6or its#rorams3 and are carryin them o!ts!ccessf!""y5


22/42

Ste-s in theAccrediting Process

INSTIT

#

%TI!NA

"

SE"

PRE"IMI

%NAR>

S#R3

E>

3ISIT


23/42

Ste-s inthe

AccreditingProcess

INSTIT#TI!NA"SE" is

acom-rehensi(eanalysis o) the

educationalresources and

eCecti(eness o)an institution or-rogram made

by its o4n-ersonnel )romto- to bottom

or bycommittee

created )or its-ur-ose.

AREDITATI!N

PRE"IMINAR>S#R3E> 3ISIT

may be made by or 7

accreditors )orthe -ur-ose o)corroborating

or chec=ing the

sel)%e(aluationmade by the

a--licantschool.


24/42

Areas o)Accreditation

6O??


25/42

Criteria or

ccreditation


26/42

Criteria or

ccreditation


27/42

Ty-e o) Sur(ey Re,uired Rating AccreditationStatus

Preliminary Visit 5rand Mean F 9.Noneamong the

areas is rated lessthan 9.

andidateStatus

First Survey VisitFormal!

5rand Mean F .Noneamong the

areas is rated lessthan 9.

Accredited"e(el I

Second Survey

VisitFirst "esurvey!

5rand Mean F .

Noneamong theareas is rated less

than .

Accredited"e(el II

#hird Survey VisitSecond "esurvey!

5rand Mean F 7.Noneamong the

areas is rated lessthan .

Accredited"e(el III

MINIMUM R TING FOR THE

CCREDIT TION

on1dentiality $ Integrity


28/42

The re"ationshi# bet2een theaccreditin bodies and theinstit!tion see7in an accreditedstat!s is #ri(ate and (o"!ntary&

The "eitimate interest of the

accreditin aencies and theirofficia"s for maintainin and#reser(in the interity ofaccreditation m!st be reconci"ed2ith broader societa" needs

re%!irin disc"os!re of basic andessentia" information&

on1dentiality $ Integrityo)

Accreditation

The main concern is to maintainand #rotect the interity andeffecti(eness of the accreditin

#rocess&


29/42

Institu

tional

Sustainab

ility

Assessm

ent


30/42

QA $ill loo) at t#e institutionalerfor"ance in ter"s of t#e HEI(s caacityto translate olicy into *uality ro!ra"s

and *uality results. T#is can be ac#ievedt#rou!# internal QA syste"s t#at loo) intot#e cycle of9

lannin!

I"le"entation

Revie$

En#ance"ent


31/42

8& .o(ernance and /anaement

@ey Result Areas o) theAssessment


32/42

ISA ore Indicators andriteria


33/42


34/42


35/42


36/42

) i


37/42

Summary o) Re,uirementsAccording to Ty-e

S ) i


38/42


S ) R i


39/42



40/42

*o4 QA Ma=es aDiCerence

6here QA Ma=es a DiCerence

QualityPlanning

QualityAssuranc

e

Qualityontrol

QAMeasure

Accreditation

GE/ternalQAH

ISAGInternal

QAH

Analytical Matri/ )or QualityAssurance


41/42

+The ,uality o) a leader isreected in the standards

they set )or themsel(es.2Ray @roc

+Quality is not anact0 it is a habit.2

Aristotle

+Quality meansdoing it right 4henno one is loo=ing.2

$enry Ford
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/ray_kroc.htmlhttp://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/ray_kroc.html


42/42

tqm through accreditation and institutional sustainability assessment

Documents