this month in radiology february 2009

4
3A DEPARTMENTS This Month in Radiology Radiology: Volume 250: Number 2—February 2009 US Followed by CT Cost-Effective for Diagnosing Pediatric Appendicitis For diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis, a cost-effective method is to start with US (especially when prevalence is extremely low) and follow negative US findings with CT. In a Markov- based model comprising lifetime radiation risk, societal willingness to pay, and other fac- tors, Wan and colleagues found that US followed by CT was a cost-effective imaging strategy in children as young as 5 years old. Acknowledging that clinicians should avoid radiation exposure to children whenever possible, the researchers said they hoped the study would encourage clinicians to recognize that the use of CT is justified when the diagnosis of appendicitis is in question, especially in those cases when US is inconclusive. ❚  Page 378 CT Texture Analysis Predicts Colorectal Cancer Survival Texture analysis shows promise as a potential biomarker for survival in patients with col- orectal cancer. In an evaluation of 48 patients, Miles and colleagues found that a texture pa- rameter comparing the uniformity of distribution of CT image features between 10 and 12 pixels, when applied to portal phase CT of the liver, can help identify patients who had poor survival outcomes. The researchers concluded that the method is potentially a better pre- dictor of survival in patients with colorectal cancer than CT perfusion imaging. ❚  Page 444 CT Excludes Appendicitis, Even When the Appendix Is Not Visualized The accuracy of excluding the diagnosis of appendicitis on a normal pediatric abdomi- nopelvic CT image with a nonvisualized appendix is similar to that obtained in cas- es with a partially or even fully visualized appendix. In a study of 156 children sus- pected of having appendicitis, Garcia and colleagues found that while the amount of pericecal fat correlated positively with the detectability of the appendix, CT im- ages with nonvisualized appendix yielded a high negative predictive value similar to that of CT images with a partially or fully visualized appendix. The false-negative rate was similar to those in two adult series, the researchers observed. ❚  Page 531 Consensus Panel Improves Breast Screening Diagnosis, Reduces Recall Rates A consensus review of cases with discordant findings increases the number of malignant cancers diagnosed, reduces unwarranted patient recall, and is associated with a low false-negative rate. Shaw and colleagues found that the Irish National Breast Screen- ing Program consensus panel—which reviewed 1% of the 128 569 screening cases— identified 7.33% of the 968 cancers diagnosed in the screening population, with an overall recall rate of 4.41%. The researchers concluded this method facilitates the early diagnosis of cancers with subtle findings on mammograms while significant- ly reducing the number of normal cases recalled for further assessment. ❚  Page 354 Combined CT Protocol Cuts Time to Differentiate Adrenal Adenomas from Nonadenomas A combined diagnostic CT protocol for distinguishing adrenal adenomas from non- adenomas with a short examination time yields results comparable to those with longer protocols. In a retrospective study of CT diagnostic parameters in 61 pa- tients, Kamiyama and colleagues found that combined use of unenhanced CT at- tenuation, 5-minute enhanced CT attenuation, percentage enhancement washout ratio, and relative percentage enhancement washout ratio yielded high specific- ity in diagnosing total adrenal adenomas and lipid-poor adenomas. The researchers concluded that the combined methods demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy with a shorter examination time than does a standard 10-minute protocol. ❚  Page 474 ©RSNA, 2009 Note: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, use the Radiology Reprints form at the end of this article.

Upload: hatchxanadu

Post on 12-Jul-2015

169 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: This Month In Radiology February 2009

3A

Departments ■

This Month in Radiology

Radiology: Volume 250: Number 2—February 2009

US Followed by CT Cost-Effective for Diagnosing Pediatric Appendicitis

For diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis, a cost-effective method is to start with US (especially when prevalence is extremely low) and follow negative US findings with CT. In a Markov-based model comprising lifetime radiation risk, societal willingness to pay, and other fac-tors, Wan and colleagues found that US followed by CT was a cost-effective imaging strategy in children as young as 5 years old. Acknowledging that clinicians should avoid radiation exposure to children whenever possible, the researchers said they hoped the study would encourage clinicians to recognize that the use of CT is justified when the diagnosis of appendicitis is in question, especially in those cases when US is inconclusive. ❚  Page 378

CT Texture Analysis Predicts Colorectal Cancer Survival

Texture analysis shows promise as a potential biomarker for survival in patients with col-orectal cancer. In an evaluation of 48 patients, Miles and colleagues found that a texture pa-rameter comparing the uniformity of distribution of CT image features between 10 and 12 pixels, when applied to portal phase CT of the liver, can help identify patients who had poor survival outcomes. The researchers concluded that the method is potentially a better pre-dictor of survival in patients with colorectal cancer than CT perfusion imaging. ❚  Page 444

CT Excludes Appendicitis, Even When the Appendix Is Not Visualized

The accuracy of excluding the diagnosis of appendicitis on a normal pediatric abdomi-nopelvic CT image with a nonvisualized appendix is similar to that obtained in cas-es with a partially or even fully visualized appendix. In a study of 156 children sus-pected of having appendicitis, Garcia and colleagues found that while the amount of pericecal fat correlated positively with the detectability of the appendix, CT im-ages with nonvisualized appendix yielded a high negative predictive value similar to that of CT images with a partially or fully visualized appendix. The false-negative rate was similar to those in two adult series, the researchers observed. ❚  Page 531

Consensus Panel Improves Breast Screening Diagnosis, Reduces Recall Rates

A consensus review of cases with discordant findings increases the number of malignant cancers diagnosed, reduces unwarranted patient recall, and is associated with a low false-negative rate. Shaw and colleagues found that the Irish National Breast Screen-ing Program consensus panel—which reviewed 1% of the 128 569 screening cases—identified 7.33% of the 968 cancers diagnosed in the screening population, with an overall recall rate of 4.41%. The researchers concluded this method facilitates the early diagnosis of cancers with subtle findings on mammograms while significant-ly reducing the number of normal cases recalled for further assessment. ❚  Page 354

Combined CT Protocol Cuts Time to Differentiate Adrenal Adenomas from Nonadenomas

A combined diagnostic CT protocol for distinguishing adrenal adenomas from non-adenomas with a short examination time yields results comparable to those with longer protocols. In a retrospective study of CT diagnostic parameters in 61 pa-tients, Kamiyama and colleagues found that combined use of unenhanced CT at-tenuation, 5-minute enhanced CT attenuation, percentage enhancement washout ratio, and relative percentage enhancement washout ratio yielded high specific-ity in diagnosing total adrenal adenomas and lipid-poor adenomas. The researchers concluded that the combined methods demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy with a shorter examination time than does a standard 10-minute protocol. ❚  Page 474

©RSNA, 2009

Note: This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues or clients, use the Radiology Reprints form at the end of this article.

Page 2: This Month In Radiology February 2009

THIS MONTH IN Radiology ■ ContinueD

4A Radiology: Volume 250: Number 2—February 2009

Functional MR Demonstrates Early Transarterial Chemoembolization Response in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Functional MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma demonstrates vascular and cellu-lar response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) well before changes in tumor size occur. In 24 patients who underwent TACE, Kamel and colleagues found a signif-icant persistent reduction in tumor enhancement within 24 hours after treatment, as well as changes in apparent diffusion coefficient values during the following weeks. Tu-mor size remained unchanged up to 4 weeks after therapy. The researchers conclud-ed functional images depicting vascularization and cellularity may be an early indica-tor of TACE response and should be incorporated into early assessment. ❚  Page 466An editorial by Padhani accompanies this article (p 324).

Right Pulmonary Artery Distensibility Assists Pulmonary Hypertension Diagnosis

Measuring right pulmonary artery (RPA) distensibility on electrocardiographi-cally gated multidetector CT can improve diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. In 45 patients, Revel and colleagues evaluated RPA distensibility, as well as right ven-tricular outflow tract myocardial thickness, diameter, and cross-sectional area, dur-ing the systole and diastole. They found the largest area under the receiver oper-ating characteristic curve for RPA distensibility, which also showed the closest corre-lation with mean pulmonary arterial pressure. RPA distensibility could be useful for pulmonary hypertension risk stratification, the researchers concluded. ❚  Page 558

Airflow Obstruction from Asthma Persists Despite Treatment, Disease Severity

MR imaging with hyperpolarized helium 3 (3He) reveals that focal airflow impediment within the lungs of asthma patients can persist over time. de Lange and colleagues ob-served in 26 patients imaged twice on the same day that 75% of focal airway narrow-ing defects remained in the same location, with 71% remaining unchanged in size. The researchers observed in another 17 patients imaged on multiple days that up to 67% of defects persisted between the first and second examinations, with 46%–58% remaining unchanged in size. More than a third of defects remained in the same location after ap-proximately 3 months, the researchers noted, and more than 50% of those defects did not change in size. The persistence of regional airflow impediment was independent of disease severity or whether patients used asthma medications, the researchers found. They con-cluded that 3He MR imaging improves understanding of the changes in regional airflow obstruction occurring over time within the lungs of patients with asthma. ❚  Page 567

PET/CT Algorithm Refines Characterization of Adrenal Nodules in Lung Cancer

A proposed combined PET/CT algorithm for evaluating adrenal nodules provides more definitive characterization in patients known to have or suspected of having lung can-cer. In 147 patients with 187 adrenal nodules, Brady and colleagues found that com-bined PET/CT criteria utilizing a standardized uptake value (SUV) of the most intense pixel within the adrenal nodule (maximum SUV) of greater than 3.1 and hyperattenua-tion (>10 HU) was highly sensitive for depicting metastatic nodules, and applying a fur-ther cutoff—ratio of nodule maximum SUV to liver average SUV greater than 2.5—identi-fied 22 of 37 metastatic lesions and excluded all fluorodeoxyglucose-avid benign nodules. The proposed algorithm refines adrenal nodule characterization, the researchers con-cluded, and can spare some patients from undergoing further interventions. ❚  Page 523

In Patients with Intermittent Claudication Supervised Exercise Offers Same Benefits as Endovascular Revascularization

Patients with intermittent claudication who undergo a supervised exercise program may ex-perience the same benefits within a year of intervention as those who undergo endovascular revascularization. Spronk and colleagues observed 151 patients who either underwent en-dovascular revascularization with an angioplasty-first approach or participated in hospital-based supervised exercise. The researchers found that, while patients who underwent en-dovascular revascularization saw more immediate improvement in functional capacity and quality of life, there was no significant difference in these parameters between the two treat-ment groups after 6 months and 12 months. The researchers noted that the findings may lead to further investigation of supervised exercise in addition to revascularization. ❚  Page 586

Page 3: This Month In Radiology February 2009

Radiology 2009This is your reprint order form or pro forma invoice

(Please keep a copy of this document for your records.)

Author Name _______________________________________________________________________________________________Title of Article _______________________________________________________________________________________________Issue of Journal_______________________________ Reprint # _____________ Publication Date ________________Number of Pages_______________________________ KB # _____________ Symbol RadiologyColor in Article? Yes / No (Please Circle)Please include the journal name and reprint number or manuscript number on your purchase order or other correspondence.

Order and Shipping Information

Reprint Costs (Please see page 2 of 2 for reprint costs/fees.)

________ Number of reprints ordered $_________

________ Number of color reprints ordered $_________

________ Number of covers ordered $_________

Subtotal $_________

Taxes $_________(Add appropriate sales tax for Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and the District of Columbia or Canadian GST to the reprints if your order is to be shipped to these locations.)

First address included, add $32 for each additional shipping address $_________

TOTAL $_________

Shipping Address (cannot ship to a P.O. Box) Please Print Clearly

Name ___________________________________________Institution _________________________________________Street ___________________________________________City ____________________ State _____ Zip ___________Country ___________________________________________Quantity___________________ Fax ___________________Phone: Day _________________ Evening _______________E-mail Address _____________________________________

Additional Shipping Address* (cannot ship to a P.O. Box)

Name ___________________________________________Institution _________________________________________Street ___________________________________________City ________________ State ______ Zip ___________Country _________________________________________Quantity __________________ Fax __________________Phone: Day ________________ Evening ______________E-mail Address ____________________________________* Add $32 for each additional shipping address

Payment and Credit Card DetailsEnclosed: Personal Check ___________

Credit Card Payment Details _________Checks must be paid in U.S. dollars and drawn on a U.S. Bank.Credit Card: __ VISA __ Am. Exp. __ MasterCardCard Number __________________________________Expiration Date_________________________________Signature: _____________________________________

Please send your order form and prepayment made payable to:

Cadmus ReprintsP.O. Box 751903Charlotte, NC 28275-1903

Note: Do not send express packages to this location, PO Box.FEIN #:541274108

Invoice or Credit Card InformationInvoice Address Please Print ClearlyPlease complete Invoice address as it appears on credit card statementName ____________________________________________Institution ________________________________________Department _______________________________________Street ____________________________________________City ________________________ State _____ Zip _______Country ___________________________________________Phone _____________________ Fax _________________E-mail Address _____________________________________

Cadmus will process credit cards and Cadmus Journal Services will appear on the credit card statement.

If you don’t mail your order form, you may fax it to 410-820-9765 with your credit card information.

Signature __________________________________________ Date _______________________________________Signature is required. By signing this form, the author agrees to accept the responsibility for the payment of reprints and/or all charges described in this document.

Reprint order forms and purchase orders or prepayments must be received 72 hours after receipt of form either by mail or by fax at 410-820-9765. It is the policy of Cadmus Reprints to issue one invoice per order.

Please print clearly.

Page 1 of 2RB-1/01/09

Page 4: This Month In Radiology February 2009

Radiology 2009Black and White Reprint Prices

Domestic (USA only)# of

Pages50 100 200 300 400 500

1-4 $239 $260 $285 $303 $323 $3405-8 $379 $420 $455 $491 $534 $5729-12 $507 $560 $651 $684 $748 $814

13-16 $627 $698 $784 $868 $954 $1,03817-20 $755 $845 $947 $1,064 $1,166 $1,27221-24 $878 $985 $1,115 $1,250 $1,377 $1,51825-28 $1,003 $1,136 $1,294 $1,446 $1,607 $1,75729-32 $1,128 $1,281 $1,459 $1,632 $1,819 $2,002

Covers $149 $164 $219 $275 $335 $393

International (includes Canada and Mexico)# of

Pages50 100 200 300 400 500

1-4 $299 $314 $367 $429 $484 $5465-8 $470 $502 $616 $722 $838 $9499-12 $637 $687 $852 $1,031 $1,190 $1,369

13-16 $794 $861 $1,088 $1,313 $1,540 $1,76517-20 $963 $1,051 $1,324 $1,619 $1,892 $2,16821-24 $1,114 $1,222 $1,560 $1,906 $2,244 $2,58825-28 $1,287 $1,412 $1,801 $2,198 $2,607 $2,99829-32 $1,441 $1,586 $2,045 $2,499 $2,959 $3,418

Covers $211 $224 $324 $444 $558 $672

Minimum order is 50 copies. For orders larger than 500 copies, please consult Cadmus Reprints at 800-407-9190.

Reprint CoverCover prices are listed above. The cover will include the publication title, article title, and author name in black.

ShippingShipping costs are included in the reprint prices. Do mesticorders are shipped via FedEx Ground service. Foreign orders are shipped via a proof of delivery air service.

Multiple ShipmentsOrders can be shipped to more than one location. Please be aware that it will cost $32 for each additional location.

DeliveryYour order will be shipped within 2 weeks of the journal print date. Allow extra time for delivery.

Color Reprint PricesDomestic (USA only)

# of Pages

50 100 200 300 400 500

1-4 $247 $267 $385 $515 $650 $7805-8 $297 $435 $655 $923 $1194 $14679-12 $445 $563 $926 $1,339 $1,748 $2,162

13-16 $587 $710 $1,201 $1,748 $2,297 $2,84317-20 $738 $858 $1,474 $2,167 $2,846 $3,53221-24 $888 $1,005 $1,750 $2,575 $3,400 $4,23025-28 $1,035 $1,164 $2,034 $2,986 $3,957 $4,91229-32 $1,186 $1,311 $2,302 $3,402 $4,509 $5,612

Covers $149 $164 $219 $275 $335 $393

International (includes Canada and Mexico))# of

Pages50 100 200 300 400 500

1-4 $306 $321 $467 $642 $811 $9865-8 $387 $517 $816 $1,154 $1,498 $1,8449-12 $574 $689 $1,157 $1,686 $2,190 $2,717

13-16 $754 $874 $1,506 $2,193 $2,883 $3,57017-20 $710 $1,063 $1,852 $2,722 $3,572 $4,42821-24 $1,124 $1,242 $2,195 $3,231 $4,267 $5,30025-28 $1,320 $1,440 $2,541 $3,738 $4,957 $6,15329-32 $1,498 $1,616 $2,888 $4,269 $5,649 $7028

Covers $211 $224 $324 $444 $558 $672

Tax DueResidents of Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and the District of Columbia are required to add the appropriate sales tax to each reprint order. For orders shipped to Canada, please add 7% Canadian GST unless exemption is claimed.

OrderingReprint order forms and purchase order or prepayment is required to process your order. Please reference journal name and reprint number or manuscript number on anycorrespondence. You may use the reverse side of this form as a proforma invoice. Please return your order form and prepayment to:

Cadmus ReprintsP.O. Box 751903Charlotte, NC 28275-1903

Note: Do not send express packages to this location, PO Box.FEIN #:541274108

Please direct all inquiries to:

Rose A. Baynard800-407-9190 (toll free number)410-819-3966 (direct number)410-820-9765 (FAX number)[email protected] (e-mail)

Reprint Order Forms and purchase order or prepayments must be received 72 hours after receipt of form.

Page 2 of 2