the need for change in the scope of agriculture research evaluation: lessons from strides made in...

10
The need for change in The need for change in the scope of the scope of Agriculture Research Agriculture Research Evaluation: Evaluation: Lessons from Strides made in Lessons from Strides made in Southern Africa Southern Africa By By Mariam A.T.J. Mapila and Choolwe Mariam A.T.J. Mapila and Choolwe Haankuku Haankuku Paper prepared for the Perspectives in Impact Evaluation Workshop: Approaches to Assessing Development Effectiveness 31 st March to 2 nd April, 2009 Cairo, Egypt

Upload: edgar-hawkins

Post on 24-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The need for change in The need for change in the scope of Agriculture the scope of Agriculture

Research Evaluation:Research Evaluation:Lessons from Strides made in Lessons from Strides made in

Southern Africa Southern Africa

By By

Mariam A.T.J. Mapila and Choolwe Haankuku Mariam A.T.J. Mapila and Choolwe Haankuku

Paper prepared for the Perspectives in Impact Evaluation Workshop: Approaches to

Assessing Development Effectiveness

31st March to 2nd April, 2009 Cairo, Egypt

22

IntroductionIntroduction Agriculture research Agriculture research

paradigm shift in Africaparadigm shift in Africa Disparity between economic Disparity between economic

evaluation outcomes and evaluation outcomes and realities on the ground realities on the ground

Low adoption of agricultural Low adoption of agricultural innovations innovations

Better understanding of Better understanding of beneficiaries role in research beneficiaries role in research processprocess

Improvements in research-Improvements in research-extension-farmer continuum extension-farmer continuum

Donor fatigueDonor fatigue

33

Paradigm shiftParadigm shift

1. Changes in agriculture research processes1. Changes in agriculture research processes

Top down conventional processes

Participatory research processes

Innovative agricultural research process

Intellectual participation of end users

involvement of non-traditional research actors

Source: FAO-Participatory Processes

44

2. Changes in Priority Setting exercises

Paradigm shift cont’Paradigm shift cont’

•Stakeholder perception Stakeholder perception (excluding end users(excluding end users

•Precedence methodsPrecedence methods

•Scoring of various objectivesScoring of various objectives

•Mathematical programming Mathematical programming methodsmethods

•Economic surplus methodsEconomic surplus methods

Objective

SubjectiveSubjectiveCombined methods that reflect both subjective and objective methods and which include end users

Paradigm shift cont’Paradigm shift cont’3. Changes in Evaluation of 3. Changes in Evaluation of

Agricultural ResearchAgricultural Research Brought about by: Brought about by:

Disparities between evaluation Disparities between evaluation results and reality on the groundresults and reality on the ground

Criticisms of current evaluation Criticisms of current evaluation methods:methods: Economic surplus methods results Economic surplus methods results

are biased up are biased up Attribution problems Attribution problems Measurement of inappropriate Measurement of inappropriate

parameters especially at the micro parameters especially at the micro level (concentration on level (concentration on productivity)productivity)

55

66

•Evaluate changes in capacities of all actors in the research process

•Capacity to conduct research and determine research agendas•Capacity to analyze & interpret findings •Capacity to network & ‘Innovate’

•Assess productivity changes while accounting for:•Population growth•Environmental degradation

•Assess both macro and micro level productivity changes

Offsets any output growth

Paradigm shift – Evaluation

•Assess Institutional distortions

•Continuity of research programs•On smallholder outcomes

•Assess non-traditional research outcomes

•Marketing outcomes in addition to income outcomes

•Evaluate and document unforeseen negative consequences of agricultural research processes•Evaluate and document short falls of innovative agricultural research processes

Paradigm shift cont’- shift cont’-EvaluationEvaluation

Human capital changes and ability to adapt technologies to local contexts

Social capital outcomes Simulation analysis

studies to assess potential impacts of macro level policy changes on rural households

Paradigm shift cont’- shift cont’-EvaluationEvaluation

Changes are taking place in agricultural research processes Agenda setting Process Evaluation

Need for robust empirical evidence to establish: If these changes are the desired one’s If changes are bringing about the intended outcomes in

the livelihoods of smallholders

Conclusion

THANK YOU