the making of a sustainable campus...dragonfly on prairie walk, 2013 5 photo credit: m. b. radeck in...
TRANSCRIPT
1
The Making of a Sustainable
Campus
April 11, 2014 By Mary Beth Radeck
2
The Making of a Sustainable
Campus
Review Analysis Best Practices Recommendation
From this
3
Photo credit: Google maps
to this
4
Photo credit: M. B. Radeck
Dragonfly on Prairie Walk, 2013
5
Photo credit: M. B. Radeck
6
Lillian and Larry Goodman Center 501 S. Wabash Avenue
– LEED silver
Wabash Vertical Campus 425 S. Wabash Avenue
– LEED gold
50% of food packaging composted
Non-toxic, low VOC materials
Local food
and this.
53-75% of renewable power
11,500 SF green roofs
Daylighting
7
Photo credit: tbd
8
How did RU do it?
Photo credit: M. B. Radeck
9
Visionaries Committed to Change
Leading: President Middleton
“Roosevelt University is committed to being at the forefront of sustainability practices by continuously working to integrate measurable sustainability efforts throughout its campuses and by providing advice and leadership to the members of the University community."
Educating: D. Bradford Hunt & Professor Bryson
- Evelyn T. Stone College of Professional Studies
- Sustainability Studies Program & Service Learning/Outreach, Michael A. Bryson
Sustaining: Steven Hoselton & Paul J. Matthews
- Campus Planning and Operations
Framework: Illinois Sustainability Compact – Gold level by 2015
10
Today, RU’s “Values in Action”
Changing per Hoselton (2013)
- 53.9% of campus electricity from renewables or offset
- $274,236 in grants and rebates received through 2013
- Trash diversion rate from landfills planned at 50% by 2014
- Energy audit complete; efficiency planned for Schaumburg
- Smart building management system to save 87,000 kWh per year
- Smart power strips/motion sensors to save 12,900 kWh per year
- Convert to LED lighting
- Convert all roofing from R8 to R20-25 insulation by 2018
- Storm water management: pervious paving to replace parking lot in Schaumburg by 2023
- Community vegetable garden, Prairie walk and educational signage
11
Today, RU’s “Values in Action”
Educating
- Sustainability Studies Bachelor’s degree program fully engaged
- Outreach and service learning opportunities growing
- Sustainability websites, blogs, Twitter and facebook
Photo credit: M. Bryson
12
Today, RU’s “Values in Action”
Sustaining
- Engaged in sustainable community
- Educate by example
- Participation in Portfolio Manager
- Integrated, natural pest management
- Sustainable purchasing policy includes
cage-free, hormone-free and local food
- Students engaged in RU Green and
Green pledge
13
Opportunities 2015 and beyond
Ecological impacts - measureable results; further recognition
- reduced GHGs
- connected green space; biodiversity, arboretum, edible forests
Economic impacts - enhanced savings through improvement
- funded sustainable campus advancements
- grants & funding
- attract talent and students
Equity impacts - campus as living laboratory; research
- demonstrate social justice mission
- address water equity issues unique to region
14
Where do we go from here?
For a Sustainable Future
- Illinois Sustainability Compact Gold by 2015
Today’s Goals
1. Assessment and continuous improvement
2. Communicate progress to campus community
Future Goals?
3. Include sustainability as a key principle of campus master plan
4. Develop sustainability plan
5. Integrate sustainability at a high level in strategic plan
15
Assess and Plan
What are sustainability assessments?
- a snapshot of current state
- can be used to measure results; is not a detailed, long-term plan
- AASHE & ACUPCC offer assessment tools
What are sustainability plans?
“encompass a large array of issues that affect not only campus land use,
but also operations, academics, and administration”
- goals and metrics to measure against
- “emerging, integrative strategy” sets comprehensive sustainability goals
- New: most plans developed over the last 3-4 years
- Implementation success related to stakeholder involvement
Source: White (2014).
Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008).
16
Sustainability Plan Elements
Includes the mission and vision for a fully-sustainable university
Outlines the long-term strategy to meet defined goals
Is comprehensive
Includes metrics to measure progress
Clarifies the business case
Is iterative on an annual basis
Incorporates benchmarks and assessments against metrics
Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008).
17
Best-in-Class Sustainability Strategy
Example of Best-in-Class behavior
“Well-implemented and managed,
sustainability strategy strengthens
a business ecosystem on multiple and
concretely demonstrable levels”
- Aberdeen Group (2009)
The Best-in-Class measure, manage, collaborate,
communicate, adjust and reinvest.
Schaumburg’s Prairie Walk
Photo credit: M. B. Radeck
18
Best-in-Class Benefits
Savings possible at varying levels of commitment
Metric Best-in-Class Average Laggard Paper costs - 11% - 7% + 13%
Facilities costs - 10% - 1% + 15%
Energy costs - 9% - 2% + 19%
Waste/disposal costs - 8% -- + 7%
Packaging costs - 7% - 1% + 1%
Transport/logistics costs - 5% - 2% + 12% Source: Aberdeen Group, February, 2009
19
Measurable Strategic Goals
Tie Strategic Goals with Measurable Outcomes
Pressures Actions Capabilities Enablers • CSR goals • Need for
competitive advantage
• Implement organization-wide vision and performance standards
• Adopt sustainable strategy
• Implement travel reduction
• Holistic lifestyle approach to activities
• Real-time visibility
• Comprehensive performance targets
• Automated reporting
• Analytics/ intelligence solution
• Energy management • Environmental
management software • Recycling/reuse/repurpose • Paperless solutions • Telepresence • Facility management
software/services
Source: Aberdeen Group, February, 2009
20
What is the typical approach?
Campus Sustainability Plans in the United States: Where, What, and How to Evaluate?
a study by White (2014)
Study Method
Compiled all available sustainability plans in the U.S. in 2011
From AASHE website inventory and internet search
Chose those which focused on “integrating operational, academic and administrative aspects of campus sustainability”
Strict climate action plans excluded
21
27 University Sustainability Plans
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Energy
Waste
Green Building
Water
Purchasing
Education & Outreach
Transportation
Green House Gas Inventory
Climate Action Plan
Landscape Plan
Local Food
Administration Involvement
Research
Social Justice/Diversity
Source: White (2014)
22
27 University Sustainability Plans
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Energy
Waste
Green Building
Water
Purchasing
Education & Outreach
Transportation
Green House Gas Inventory
Climate Action Plan
Landscape Plan
Local Food
Administration Involvement
Research
Social Justice/Diversity
Elements included in over 60% of plans
Source: White (2014)
23
27 University Sustainability Plans
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Energy
Waste
Green Building
Water
Purchasing
Education & Outreach
Transportation
Green House Gas Inventory
Climate Action Plan
Landscape Plan
Local Food
Administration Involvement
Research
Social Justice/Diversity
Least common elements
Source: White (2014)
24
27 University Sustainability Plans
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Energy
Waste
Green Building
Water
Purchasing
Education & Outreach
Transportation
Green House Gas Inventory
Climate Action Plan
Landscape Plan
Local Food
Administration Involvement
Research
Social Justice/Diversity
Elements excluded from RU’s goals
Source: White (2014)
White’s Findings Compared
25
White, S. S., (2014) “Campus Sustainability Plans in the United States: Where, What, and How to Evaluate?”
White (2014): 27 Sust Plans
Thomashow (2014):
9 Elements of a Sust. Campus
AASHE STARS 2.0
(2014) ACUPCC (2012)
IL Sust Compact
(2011)
RU’s Current Goals (2013) Areas of Focus
96% Energy 93% Waste 89% Green Building 85% Water 81% Purchasing 81% Education & Outreach 78% Transportation 74% Green House Gas Inventory 74% Climate Action Plan 67% Landscape Plan/Biodiversity 67% Food 63% Administration Involvement 41% Research 30% Social Justice/Equity/Community
Governance/Engagement Investment Aesthetics Health/Wellbeing Policy on Sustainability Website Sustainability Plan Source: White (2014)
Elements of Best-in-Class Assessment
26
White, S. S., (2014) “Campus Sustainability Plans in the United States: Where, What, and How to Evaluate?”
White (2014) 27 Sust Plans
Thomashow (2014):
9 Elements of a Sust. Campus
AASHE STARS 2.0
(2014) ACUPCC (2012)
IL Sust Compact
(2011)
RU’s Current Goals (2013) Areas of Focus
96% Energy 93% Waste 89% Green Building 85% Water 81% Purchasing 81% Education & Outreach 78% Transportation 74% Green House Gas Inventory 74% Climate Action Plan 67% Landscape Plan/Biodiversity 67% Food 63% Administration Involvement 41% Research 30% Social Justice/Equity/Community
Governance/Engagement Investment Aesthetics Health/Wellbeing Policy on Sustainability Website Sustainability Plan
Case study of Unity College 560 students: “real-time frugal sustainability”
Elements of Best-in-Class Assessment
27
White, S. S., (2014) “Campus Sustainability Plans in the United States: Where, What, and How to Evaluate?”
White (2014): 27 Sust Plans
Thomashow (2014):
9 Elements of a Sust. Campus
AASHE STARS 2.0
(2014) ACUPCC (2012)
IL Sust Compact
(2011)
RU’s Current Goals (2013) Areas of Focus
96% Energy 93% Waste 89% Green Building 85% Water 81% Purchasing 81% Education & Outreach 78% Transportation 74% Green House Gas Inventory 74% Climate Action Plan 67% Landscape Plan/Biodiversity 67% Food 63% Administration Involvement 41% Research 30% Social Justice/Equity/Community
Governance/Engagement Investment Aesthetics Health/Wellbeing Policy on Sustainability Website Sustainability Plan
Comprehensive assessment tool
Elements of Best-in-Class Assessment
28
White, S. S., (2014) “Campus Sustainability Plans in the United States: Where, What, and How to Evaluate?”
White (2014): 27 Sust Plans
Thomashow (2014):
9 Elements of a Sust. Campus
AASHE STARS 2.0
(2014) ACUPCC (2012)
IL Sust Compact
(2011)
RU’s Current Goals (2013) Areas of Focus
96% Energy 93% Waste 89% Green Building 85% Water 81% Purchasing 81% Education & Outreach 78% Transportation 74% Green House Gas Inventory 74% Climate Action Plan 67% Landscape Plan/Biodiversity 67% Food 63% Administration Involvement 41% Research 30% Social Justice/Equity/Community
Governance/Engagement Investment Aesthetics Health/Wellbeing Policy on Sustainability Website Sustainability Plan
Framework to become carbon neutral and advance education for sustainability
Elements of Best-in-Class Assessment
29
White, S. S., (2014) “Campus Sustainability Plans in the United States: Where, What, and How to Evaluate?”
White (2014): 27 Sust Plans
Thomashow (2014):
9 Elements of a Sust. Campus
AASHE STARS 2.0
(2014) ACUPCC (2012)
IL Sust Compact
(2011)
RU’s Current Goals (2013) Areas of Focus
96% Energy 93% Waste 89% Green Building 85% Water 81% Purchasing 81% Education & Outreach 78% Transportation 74% Green House Gas Inventory 74% Climate Action Plan 67% Landscape Plan/Biodiversity 67% Food 63% Administration Involvement 41% Research 30% Social Justice/Equity/Community
Governance/Engagement Investment Aesthetics Health/Wellbeing Policy on Sustainability Website Sustainability Plan
Encourage sustainable behavior, education, research and outreach
Elements of Best-in-Class Assessment
30
White, S. S., (2014) “Campus Sustainability Plans in the United States: Where, What, and How to Evaluate?”
White (2014): 27 Sust Plans
Thomashow (2014):
9 Elements of a Sust. Campus
AASHE STARS 2.0
(2013) ACUPCC (2012)
IL Sust Compact
(2011)
RU’s Current Goals (2013) Areas of Focus
96% Energy 93% Waste 89% Green Building 85% Water 81% Purchasing 81% Education & Outreach 78% Transportation 74% Green House Gas Inventory 74% Climate Action Plan 67% Landscape Plan/Biodiversity 67% Food 63% Administration Involvement 41% Research 30% Social Justice/Equity/Community
Governance/Engagement Investment Aesthetics Health/Wellbeing Policy on Sustainability Website Sustainability Plan
RU goals meet Compact Gold commitment
31
Best-in-Class Sustainable Development Defined
1987 Brundtland Commission defined sustainable development
“Development which meets the needs of current generations without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." according to UNECE (2014)
1989 Beyond Brundtland, progressive policy adopted by Dutch government as cited by Doppelt (2010)
“Every generation must leave behind good environmental quality.
…existing environmental problems must be resolved within one generation while the creation of new problems must be prevented.
For the current generation, the environmental legacy from the past must also be reduced to acceptable proportions.”
State of Oregon adopted the Dutch definition
32
Sustainability as an Alternative Economic Paradigm
Change straight-line system of
“Take-Make-Waste”
Into a circular, closed-loop system
“Borrow-Use-Return”
Toxins removed before
re-entering the natural system
Borrow Use
Return
Source: Doppelt (2010)
33
Alternative Economic Paradigm Operationalized
AstraZeneca, a multi-national pharmaceutical company Managed reputation and risk pro-actively Used many key levers and operationalized Sustainability as described by
Doppelt in “Leading Change toward Sustainability” 1. Executives created environmental vision starting with energy reduction and emissions targets 2. Safety, health and environment staff assigned role of helping units identify ways to achieve targets; suggest practical projects/activities 3. Encouraged staff (mostly scientists) to examine carbon footprint; devise its vision of success, reduction targets and strategies 4. Promoted “self-efficacy” (ability to effect change) 5. Documented benefits, successes and failures 6. Built a business case for emission reductions Source: Doppelt (2010)
34
Alternative Economic Paradigm Success
AstraZeneca, a multi-national pharmaceutical company by 2009*, achieved 68% cut in GHGs compared to 1990 Eliminated 99% of ozone-depleting gases In under 9 years, saved almost $175MM In 2008 alone, saved $59MM in energy costs compared to 2005 - Through engagement, staff learned that emission reduction has benefits beyond environmental - Prepared for increased investor scrutiny of “Carbon Disclosure Project” and became a participant - Attracted talent, increased brand value and enjoyed improved competitive position - Now positioned to thrive in a “carbon-constrained world”
Source: Doppelt, page 15 (2009)
35
Operationalizing Sustainability at RU
Photo credit: C. J. Granberg
36
Natural next steps
Commitment to climate neutrality
Assessment: GHG and energy benchmarks
Climate Action Plan
Sustainability Plan
Include social justice goals
Campus as research opportunity
Expand outreach and education
Photo credit: M. B. Radeck
37
Barriers to Sustainability at RU
Focus on cost savings risks underperformance
Under-funded efforts lack staying power
Facing common challenge to justify through ROI
Staff resources and motivation dwindling
“perception of done?” at point of diminishing returns
Post-Compact Gold: lack of an organization-wide, integrated plan
What can be done on a small budget during challenging times?
38
Snapshot of Funding Opportunities
Type RU Eligibility Area of Savings Potential Savings
Grant--Community Solar and Wind Grant Program
Non-profit, Schools Solar, Buying & Making Electricity, Wind
Expired 4/8/2013 $2.60/watt or 40% of project costs
Loans—Green Energy Non-profit Install a Renewable Energy System
Rate reduction for up to 5 years of loan; $10,000 - $10 million loans
Grant—Illinois Clean Energy Community Foundation Grant
Non-profit, Schools Energy Efficiency, Renewable Sources
Depends upon project
Grant—IEPA Nonpoint source management program
Innovative & traditional measures to control NPS pollution
Detention basin retrofit, nutrient mgmt. & educational programs
$30MM since 1990, in 2001, $5MM available
39
Snapshot of Funding Opportunities
Type RU Eligibility Area of Savings Potential Savings
Grant—IDNR Small Projects IL Wildlife Preservation Fund
Preserve, protect, perpetuate or enhance native plant resources in IL
Prairie resource, management or education
Up to $2000
Grant—IDNR Illinois Habitat Fund
Not-for-profit seeking to preserve, protect, acquire or manage habitat which has potential to support wildlife
Development & adoption of innovative conservation approaches & technologies
Depends upon project
Grant—USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
Private institutions of higher education
Energy Efficiency, Renewable Sources
$1,000 - $1MM+
Grant—US EPA Educational Grant
College or University promoting environmental stewardship & education
Prairie, gardens $2-3MM/year Regional: $75K - $200K requires non-federal matching funds up to 25%
40
The Efficient Way Forward
Fast-track a sustainability plan* through a short series of day-long workshops
Use Stars 2.0 for assessment and measurement
Enlist the help of sustainability students and give free credit to perform measurements and maintain STARS 2.0
Revisit the plan goals every year* in one day-long session
Update assessments annually*
*Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008).
41
The Efficient Way Forward
June - July 2014
Secure sponsorship
Prepare the way
*Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008).
August 2014
Day 1 September 2014
Day 2
Begin assessments
Day 3: Sustainability Plan
42
Secure a Sponsor
Role of sponsor
Position of authority: Sustainability Director?
Need top management support
Change efforts don’t stick without it
and are the key to long-term success
*Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008), p 2.
June 2014
Secure Sponsor
Tips for effective organizational change
Create a sense of urgency
Find a logical starting point
Attach project to existing efforts
Create opportunity for involvement
Communicate
Share results
43
Prepare the Way Special considerations for Sustainability Initiatives
Make sustainability understandable
Manage both short and long term
Stay above the details
Manage the emotional impact
Name the effort
*Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008), p 2.
July 2014
Prepare the way
Determine current stage of development
Avoid liabilities
Restorative
Sustainability
Green Marketing
Eco-Efficiencies
Compliance
Invest in natural/human capital
Gain competitive advantage Reposition products/services
Save money
44
Vision & Framework
Debrief the group on sustainability and review the 3Es framework
Define the business case: identify threats and opportunities
Develop a vision for sustainability
Choose a framework to define sustainability
Conduct a high-level impact assessment for the University as a whole
*Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008), p 2.
August 2014
Day 1: Vision & Framework “Make sustainability more than just the right thing to do.”
Strengths Weaknesses
Opportunities Threats
45
Structure, Criteria & Reporting
Determine the structure for sustainability efforts
Determine the criteria to select projects
Identify a set of STARS metrics to track progress
Mock-up a year-end Sustainability Report format
*Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008), p 2.
September 2014
Day 2: Structure, criteria & report format
Sustainability Director
Task force Task Force Task Force
Steering Committee
46
Assessment in STARS 2.0
*Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008), p 2.
September 2014
Begin Assessment
Assessment
Utilize AASHE’s STARS 2.0 for assessment and measurement
Advanced SUST students measure sustainability
Quality of work validated by Sustainability office to gain credit
47
Plan, Tracking & Communication
*Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008), p 2.
September
Day 3: Sustainability Plan
Develop a 2-3 year plan, identifying major
initiatives
Determine a method for coordination and tracking efforts
Develop a basic communication and training plan
48
Continued Efficiency
Revisit plan goals in one single day-long session every year*
- Original core team and participating students
- Review assessment
- Update plan and goals
*Source: Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008).
49
The Efficient Way Forward
Advance sustainability throughout the curriculum
Find funding to expand sustainability efforts
- seek and submit grant applications and apply rebates to further efforts
- promote progress to student body & media
Continue the momentum from the last 4 years
Engage the community in learning
Form collaborative community partnerships
Photo credit: M. B. Radeck
This is what a Sustainable
Campus looks like
April 11, 2014 by Mary Beth Radeck Roosevelt University Sustainability Associate
50
Photo credit: M. B. Radeck
51
Works Cited Aberdeen Group. (2009). The ROI of sustainability: making the business case. Retrieved from: http://www.intelex.com/The_ROI_of_Sustainability__Making_the_Business_Case-301-1whitepaper.aspx
Accenture & United Nations Global Compact. (2010). A new era of sustainability UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO study 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/news_events/8.1/UNGC_Accenture_CEO_Study_2010.pdf
American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment Version 2.1. (2012). Implementation Guide. Retrieved from: http://www2.presidentsclimatecommitment.org/pdf/ACUPCC_IG_Final.pdf
Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE). (2014, January). STARS technical manual version 2.0, administrative update two. Retrieved from https://stars.aashe.org/pages/about/technical-manual.html
Doppelt, B. (2010). Leading change toward sustainability. A change-management guide for business, government and civil society. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.
Epstein, M. J. (2008). Making sustainability work. San Francisco, CA: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.
Hitchcock, D. & Willard, M. (2008). The step-by-step guide to sustainability planning. How to create and implement sustainability plans in any business or organization. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
Hoselton, S., (2013). Roosevelt University Physical Resources Department sustainability program overview.
Roosevelt University. (2011). Roosevelt University Illinois Campus Sustainability Compact Commitment.
Thomashow, M. (2014). The nine elements of a sustainable campus. London, England: The MIT Press.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2014). Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/oes/nutshell/2004- 2005/focus_sustainable_development.html
White. S. S., (2014). Campus sustainability plans in the United States: where, what and how to evaluate?”. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15:2. Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid