the link between the mbti instrument and other popular ... · pdf filethe link between the...

The Link Between the MBTI Instrument & Other Popular Instruments -- Dick Thompson, Ph.D.

9/21/2009

(c) 2009 High Performing Systems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. [email protected] www.hpsys.com 706-769-5836 1

The Link Between the MBTI® Instrument and

Other Popular Instrumentsp

Dick Thompson, Ph.D.23 September 2009

1© 2009 High Performing Systems, Inc.

Henry L. (Dick) Thompson, Ph.D.President & CEO, High Performing Systems, Inc.M A U S A C d & G l St ff M.A., U. S. Army Command & General Staff CollegeM.S. & Ph.D., University of GeorgiaAreas of Expertise:

LeadershipOrganizational DevelopmentTeambuildingAssessments (cognitive ability, personality, EI, FIRO)Systems Thinking

v1.0v1.0

Nonlinear Dynamical Systems


Co-Editor of The Handbook for Developing Emotional and Social Intelligence, 2009

Author of The Stress Effect , May, 2010


9/21/2009


Objectives

See the linkage between the MBTI®See the linkage between the MBTI®

instrument and:Element B™ EQ-i® MSCEIT®

StrengthsFinder®

Explore how to use the MBTI® with

v1.0v1.0 3

Explore how to use the MBTI with these Instruments

Stimulate Thought

© 2009 High Performing Systems, Inc.

FIRO-B® and Element B™FIRO-B®

Part of FIRO® TheoryWill Schutz, Ph.D.

Element B™Part of FIRO® TheoryWill Schutz, Ph.D.Will Schutz, Ph.D.

Published 1958Inclusion, Control & Affection6 Scales

Will Schutz, Ph.D.Published 1983Inclusion, Control & Openness18 scales

v1.0v1.0© 2009 High Performing Systems, Inc. 4


9/21/2009


Element B™ Scales

Element B Scale Name SymbolI include people EB11I want to include people EB12P l i l d EB13People include me EB13I want people to include me EB14I control people EB21I want to control people EB22People control me EB23I want people to control me EB24I am open with people EB31


I am open with people EB31I want to be open with people EB32People are open with me EB33I want people to be open with me EB34

Element B™ Feedback Matrix



9/21/2009


MBTI® Instrument & Element B™ Correlations

Element B Scale Name Scale EI SN TF JPI include people EB11 - .55 .11 .10 .04I want to include people EB12 - .48 .04 .07 - .00People include me EB13 - .45 .05 .05 - .00I want people to include me EB14 - .39 - .01 .02 .01I control people EB21 - .33 .05 - .21 - .10I want to control people EB22 - .25 - .01 - .21 - .07People control me EB23 .10 .07 .19 .13I want people to control me EB24 .05 .04 .05 .07I ith l EB31 34 10 15 00


I am open with people EB31 - .34 .10 .15 .00I want to be open with people EB32 - .33 .13 .18 .06People are open with me EB33 - .28 .12 .16 .01I want people to be open with me EB34 - .24 .07 .19 .03(EI=Extraverting-Introverting, SN= Sensing-iNtuiting, TF=Thinking-Feeling, JP= Judging-Perceiving, © 2008 Henry L. Thompson, Ph.D. N=814 Red = p< .05

What is EI?

A person’s innate ability to perceive and manage his/her own emotions in a manner that results in successful

v1.0v1.0 8

interactions with the environment and, if others are present, to also perceive and manage their emotions in a manner that results in successful interpersonal interactions. Thompson, 2006



9/21/2009


Bar-On Model

v1.0v1.09


MBTI & EQ-i CorrelationsSR ESA AS IN SA EM RE IR

EI -0.35 -0.38 -0.37 -0.14 -0.25 -0.18 -0.13 -0.54SN 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.19 0.17 0.25 0.16 0.15TF 0.17 -0.22 -0.21 0.36 0.30 0.21JP 0 11 0 13 0 10JP -0.11 -0.13 -0.10

MBTI Preferences & EQ-i Subscale Correlations(EI=Extraverting-Introverting, SN= Sensing-iNtuiting, TF=Thinking-Feeling, JP= Judging-Perceiving, SR=Self Regard, ESA=EmotionalSelf Awareness, IN=Independence, SA=Self Actualization, EM=Empathy, RE=Social Responsibility, IR=Interpersonal Relationship) © 2008 Henry L. Thompson, Ph.D. N=1225

p<.05

ST IC RT FL PS OP HAEI -0.19 -0.15 -0.27 -0.15 -0.27 -0.35SN 0 15 0 23 0 21 0 10

v1.0v1.0

SN 0.15 0.23 0.21 0.10TF -0.17 -0.13 -0.14JP -0.12 -0.19 -0.26

MBTI Preferences & EQ-i Subscale Correlations(EI=Extraverting-Introverting, SN= Sensing-iNtuiting, TF=Thinking-Feeling, JP= Judging-Perceiving, ST=Stress Tolerance, IC=Impulse Control, RT=Reality Testing, FL=Flexibility, PS=Problem Solving, OP=Optimism, HA=Happiness) © 2008 Henry L. Thompson, Ph.D.



9/21/2009


v1.0v1.011 N=1225

John Mayer, Ph.D. Peter Salovey, Ph.D.

v1.0v1.012

David Caruso. Ph.D.



9/21/2009


MBTI® Instrument & MSCEIT® Correlations

PER USE UND MGT MSCEITEI -0.13SN 0.15 0.19 0.19TFJP 0.10

FAC FACI CHA EMA PIC SEN BLE SMAEI -0.12SN 0 12 0 10 0 17 0 22

MBTI Preferences & MSCEIT Branch Correlations(EI=Extraverting-Introverting, SN= Sensing-iNtuiting, TF=Thinking-Feeling, JP= Judging-Perceiving, PER=Perceiving, USE=Using, UND= Understanding, MGT=Management, MSCEIT= Total MSCEIT Score) © 2008 Henry L. Thompson, Ph.D.

N=460p<.05

v1.0v1.0

SN -0.12 0.10 0.17 0.22TF -0.13JP 0.12

MBTI Preferences & MSCEIT Task Correlations(FAC=Faces, FACI=Facilitation, CHA=Change, EMA=Emotional Management, PIC= Pictures, SEN=Sensations, BLE=Blends, SMA= Social Management) © 2008 Henry L. Thompson, Ph.D.




9/21/2009


StrengthsFinder® 1.0 vs. 2.0

“If you have taken StrengthsFinder 1.0, and you decide to take the new version, you may find that a few of your top five themes are different than they were the first time. If you compare your

i 1 0 lt t i 2 0 lt th ' t

Fine tuned to be:Faster

version 1.0 results to your version 2.0 results, there's a strong chance that at least three of your top five themes will remain the same. And in most cases, at least four themes will appear in your top five both times.” --Gallup Press

v1.0v1.0

More accurate

© 2009 High Performing Systems, Inc. 15

SF ThemesSF Themes

AchieverActivatorAdaptabilityAnalytical

AchieverActivatorAdaptabilityAnalytical

IntellectionLearnerMaximizerPositivity

IntellectionLearnerMaximizerPositivity

DeliberativeDeveloperDisciplineEmpathy

DeliberativeDeveloperDisciplineEmpathyy

ArrangerBeliefCommandCommunicationCompetitionConnectednessConsistency

yArrangerBeliefCommandCommunicationCompetitionConnectednessConsistency

yRelatorResponsibilityRestorativeSelf-AssuranceSignificanceStrategicWoo

yRelatorResponsibilityRestorativeSelf-AssuranceSignificanceStrategicWoo

p yFocusFuturisticHarmonyIdeationIncluderIndividualizationInput

p yFocusFuturisticHarmonyIdeationIncluderIndividualizationInput

v1.0v1.0 16

ConsistencyContextConsistencyContext

WooWooInputInput


9/21/2009


SF1.0 – MBTI® Linkage

v1.0v1.0 17

N=96©2005 Henry L. Thompson, Ph.D.

Note: Low scores are “high” with SF, thus, EST & J correlate with positive signs and INF & P correlate with negative signs. This is opposite of normal preference correlations.

SF1.0 – MBTI® Linkage

N=96©2005 Henry L. Thompson, Ph.D.

v1.0v1.0 18

N 96

Note: Low scores are “high” with SF, thus, EST & J correlate with positive signs and INF & P correlate with negative signs. This is opposite of normal preference correlations.


9/21/2009


SF1.0 Themes & Type Preference CorrelationsSF1.0 Themes & Type Preference Correlations

AchieverActivatorAdaptability (P)Analytical (I,S,T,J)

AchieverActivatorAdaptability (P)Analytical (I,S,T,J)

Intellection (I,N)Learner (N)MaximizerPositivity (E)

Intellection (I,N)Learner (N)MaximizerPositivity (E)

Deliberative (I)Developer (F)Discipline (S,J)Empathy (S)

Deliberative (I)Developer (F)Discipline (S,J)Empathy (S)y ( , , , )

Arranger (S)Belief (S)Command (N,T)Communication (E)CompetitionConnectedness (F)Consistency (S)

y ( , , , )Arranger (S)Belief (S)Command (N,T)Communication (E)CompetitionConnectedness (F)Consistency (S)

y ( )RelatorResponsibility (I,S)RestorativeSelf-Assurance (N)SignificanceStrategic (N)Woo (E P)

y ( )RelatorResponsibility (I,S)RestorativeSelf-Assurance (N)SignificanceStrategic (N)Woo (E P)

p y ( )Focus (T,J)Futuristic (N)Harmony (S)Ideation (N)Includer (E)IndividualizationInput (N)

p y ( )Focus (T,J)Futuristic (N)Harmony (S)Ideation (N)Includer (E)IndividualizationInput (N)

v1.0v1.0 19

Consistency (S)ContextConsistency (S)Context

Woo (E,P)Woo (E,P)Input (N)Input (N)

MBTI® Instrument and StrengthsFinder® in Tandem

There is a linkage between the MBTI®

instrument and StrengthsFinder®instrument and StrengthsFinder®

MBTI® instrument and StrengthsFinder®

are more powerful when used in Tandem

The MBTI® instrument and

v1.0v1.0 20

StrengthsFinder® are powerful tools for use in building High Performing teams



9/21/2009


Using the MBTI® Instrument and Other Instruments in Tandem

Be qualified and experienced with each instrument.Understand how the two instruments link and what is unique about eachis unique about each.Administer both instruments in advance then review and hypothesize about the results.In most cases, introduce and give Type feedback first, then the other instrument.Try not to give feedback on both instruments the

v1.0v1.0

same day---it can be difficult for people to switch between models.Using the MBTI® instrument in Tandem with other instruments increases its power.

© 2009 High Performing Systems, Inc. 21

Using the MBTI® Instrument and Other Instruments : Coaching

Augments MBTI® instrument & type Augments MBTI® instrument & type dynamics dataAdds interpersonal skills developmentEnhances interpersonal dynamics understanding & development

v1.0v1.0 22© 2009 High Performing Systems, Inc.


9/21/2009


Questions

Wrap-Up

Current MBTI® instrument and other instruments in TandemResources


The Link Between the MBTI® Instrument and

Other Popular Instruments

For more information contact:debra@hpsys com


[email protected]

the link between the mbti instrument and other popular ... · pdf filethe link between the...

Documents