the determination of total burn surface area

1
Letter to the Editor Re: Should we give vitamin D to severe burns patients? The conundrum To the Editor, We would to thank Professor GL Klein for his informative response to our letter, ‘‘Should we give vitamin D to severe burns patients?’’ [1]. We were treating a patient with 40% burns at the time of writing and the observation of a low vitamin D level was made during a routine nutritional status work up. We acknowledge that this result alone is not sufficient to reliably inform us of a patient’s vitamin D level and long-term measurement is required. We are not aware of any study that has determined whether severe burns patients have a higher risk of fractures in the adult population. If we presume there is a risk then it would be important to supplement burns patients’ diets with vitamin D. However, as Klein points out in this letter, there is a disruption in the normal hormonal and protein balance following burn injury, then perhaps supplementation of the diet should start later in a patient’s treatment rather than early. Klein also suggests that there is a high likelihood that a severe burns patient would be vitamin D deficient which raises the question of ‘‘when’’ should we supplement rather than ‘‘if’’. We feel that the question is an important one that warrants further research and we are in the process of setting up prospective trial to attempt to answer some of these questions. r e f e r e n c e [1] Mehta S, Booth S, Dheansa B. Should we give vitamin D to severe burns patients? Burns 2013;39(June):830–1. Saahil Mehta* Simon Booth Baljit Dheansa The Burns Centre, Queen Victoria Hospital, East Grinstead RH17 3DZ, United Kingdom *Corresponding author E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Mehta) Accepted 19 August 2013 0305-4179/$36.00. # 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.015 Letter to the Editor The determination of total burn surface area We read with interest a recently published article entitled ‘‘The determination of total burn surface area: how much difference?’’ by Giretzlehner et al. [1]. The research analyzes the variance and accuracy of common methods used for estimation of total burn surface area on a regular basis versus a computer-based surface estimation and documentation method. The study shows that the participants used either of the different methods used for determination of total burn surface area routinely, i.e. ‘‘Rule of Palm’’, ‘‘Rule of Nines’’, ‘‘Lund–Browder Chart’’ or other methods. These methods have shown exceptionally high deviations in contrast to a computer-aided method in the study. The article hence, raises a very pertinent issue relating to improving the objectivity and quality of burn assessments. Though the authors have presented a general comparison of common methods with computer-aided model, it would be interesting to note the variations between these common methods to know if any of these methods overestimated the burn surface area in particular. Were there differences in esti- mation of burn surface area among participants who selected only single method vs. those who selected at least two different methods of TBSA determination? The present correspondence is intended to seek this additional information that would be useful in indicating the extent of overestimation of total burn surface area using the three techniques individually, and to make choices among the common methods for a more appropriate one. Conflict of interest None declared. r e f e r e n c e [1] Giretzlehner M, Dirnberger J, Owen R, Haller HL, Lumenta DB, Kamolz LP. The determination of total burn surface area: how much difference. Burns 2013;39:1107–13. Tanuj Kanchan* Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Kasturba Medical College (Affiliated to Manipal University), Mangalore, India *Tel.: +91 824 2444590x5565; fax: +91 824 2428183; mobile: +91 9448252394 E-mail addresses: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (T. Kanchan) 0305-4179/$36.00 . # 2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.07.018 Letter to the Editor The determination of total burn surface area: How big is the difference? Thank you for your comment and feedback. You enquired about variations among the commonly used methods and if b u r n s 4 0 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 6 4 1 7 4 170

Upload: tanuj

Post on 31-Dec-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The determination of total burn surface area

Letter to the Editor

Re: Should we give vitamin D tosevere burns patients? Theconundrum

To the Editor,

We would to thank Professor GL Klein for his informative

response to our letter, ‘‘Should we give vitamin D to severe

difference?’’ by Giretzlehner et al. [1]. The research analyzes

the variance and accuracy of common methods used for

estimation of total burn surface area on a regular basis versus

a computer-based surface estimation and documentation

method. The study shows that the participants used either of

the different methods used for determination of total burn

surface area routinely, i.e. ‘‘Rule of Palm’’, ‘‘Rule of Nines’’,

‘‘Lund–Browder Chart’’ or other methods. These methods

have shown exceptionally high deviations in contrast to a

computer-aided method in the study. The article hence, raises

a very pertinent issue relating to improving the objectivity and

b u r n s 4 0 ( 2 0 1 4 ) 1 6 4 – 1 7 4170

burns patients?’’ [1]. We were treating a patient with 40%

burns at the time of writing and the observation of a low

vitamin D level was made during a routine nutritional status

work up. We acknowledge that this result alone is not

sufficient to reliably inform us of a patient’s vitamin D level

and long-term measurement is required.

We are not aware of any study that has determined whether

severe burns patients have a higher risk of fractures in the adult

population. If we presume there is a risk then it would be

important to supplement burns patients’ diets with vitamin D.

However, as Klein points out in this letter, there is a disruption

in the normal hormonal and protein balance following burn

injury, then perhaps supplementation of the diet should start

later in a patient’s treatment rather than early. Klein also

suggests that there is a high likelihood that a severe burns

patient would be vitamin D deficient which raises the question

of ‘‘when’’ should we supplement rather than ‘‘if’’.

We feel that the question is an important one that warrants

further research and we are in the process of setting up

prospective trial to attempt to answer some of these questions.

r e f e r e n c e

[1] Mehta S, Booth S, Dheansa B. Should we give vitamin D tosevere burns patients? Burns 2013;39(June):830–1.

Saahil Mehta*

Simon Booth

Baljit Dheansa

The Burns Centre, Queen Victoria Hospital,

East Grinstead RH17 3DZ, United Kingdom

*Corresponding author

E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Mehta)

Accepted 19 August 2013

0305-4179/$36.00.

# 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd and ISBI.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.015

Letter to the Editor

The determination of total burnsurface area

We read with interest a recently published article entitled

‘‘The determination of total burn surface area: how much

quality of burn assessments.

Though the authors have presented a general comparison

of common methods with computer-aided model, it would be

interesting to note the variations between these common

methods to know if any of these methods overestimated the

burn surface area in particular. Were there differences in esti-

mation of burn surface area among participants who selected

only single method vs. those who selected at least two different

methods of TBSA determination? The present correspondence is

intended to seek this additional information that would be useful

in indicating the extent of overestimation of total burn surface

area using the three techniques individually, and to make choices

among the common methods for a more appropriate one.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

r e f e r e n c e

[1] Giretzlehner M, Dirnberger J, Owen R, Haller HL, LumentaDB, Kamolz LP. The determination of total burn surface area:how much difference. Burns 2013;39:1107–13.

Tanuj Kanchan*

Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology,

Kasturba Medical College (Affiliated to Manipal University),

Mangalore, India

*Tel.: +91 824 2444590x5565; fax: +91 824 2428183;

mobile: +91 9448252394

E-mail addresses: [email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected] (T. Kanchan)

0305-4179/$36.00.

# 2013 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.07.018

Letter to the Editor

The determination of total burnsurface area: How big is the difference?

Thank you for your comment and feedback. You enquired

about variations among the commonly used methods and if