the correlation between students’ simple present...

157
THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE MASTERY AND THEIR ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMPN 1 KARYA PENGGAWA PESISIR BARAT IN 2016/2017 ACADEMIC YEAR A Thesis Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of The Requirement for S1-Degree By EVI FITRIA NPM. 1211040102 Study Program : English Education Advisor : Bambang Irfani, M. Pd Co-Advisor : Nunun Indrasari, M.Pd TARBIYAH AND TEACHER TRAINING FACULTY THE STATE INSTITUTE OF ISLAMIC STUDIES RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG 2016

Upload: others

Post on 06-Feb-2020

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT

TENSE MASTERY AND THEIR ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE

TEXT AT THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE EIGHTH GRADE OF

SMPN 1 KARYA PENGGAWA PESISIR BARAT IN

2016/2017 ACADEMIC YEAR

A Thesis

Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of

The Requirement for S1-Degree

By

EVI FITRIA

NPM. 1211040102

Study Program : English Education

Advisor : Bambang Irfani, M. Pd

Co-Advisor : Nunun Indrasari, M.Pd

TARBIYAH AND TEACHER TRAINING FACULTY

THE STATE INSTITUTE OF ISLAMIC STUDIES

RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG

2016

Page 2: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

ii

ABSTRACT

THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE

MASTERY AND THEIR ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT AT

THE FIRST SEMESTER OF THE EIGHTH GRADE OF SMPN 1 KARYA

PENGGAWA PESISIR BARAT IN 2016/2017 ACADEMIC YEAR

By:

Evi Fitria

In this research, the writer focused on the correlation between students’ simple

present tense mastery and their ability in writing descriptive text. The objective of

this research was to know whether there was a correlation between students’ simple

present tense mastery and their ability in writing descriptive text at the first semester

of the eighth grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 academic

year. There were two variables in this research, the independent variable, students’

simple present tense mastery (X) and dependent variable, students’ ability in writing

descriptive text (Y).

This is a correlation research. It is used to know the correlation between students’

simple present tense mastery and their ability in writing descriptive text. In taking the

sample of the research, cluster random sampling was applied. The population of the

research was taken from the students of eighth grade at SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa

Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 academic year. The sample of the research was taken 30

students from 121 population. In collecting the data of this research, the writer used

objective test that were multiple choices consisted of 40 items test and writing

descriptive text test. In this research, SPSS was used to compute Rank Spearmans’

formula.

After doing the hypothetical testing, the result demonstrated that there was positive

correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability in writing

descriptive text. Based on the data analysis computed by using SPSS, it was obtained

that Sig = 0,001 and α = 0.05. It means that Ha is accepted because Sig < α = 0.05.

Based on this research, it was suggested that to have a good ability in writing

descriptive text, students should have a good mastery of simple present tense.

Page 3: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability
Page 4: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability
Page 5: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

v

DECLARATION

Hereby, I state this thesis entitled “The Correlation between Students’ Simple Present

Tense Mastery and their Ability in Writing Descriptive Text at the First Semester of

the Eighth Grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic

Year” is completely my own work, I am fully aware that I have quoted some

statement and theories from various sources and they are properly acknowledged in

the text.

Bandar Lampung, 20 October 2016

Declared by,

Evi Fitria

NPM. 12110401012

Page 6: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

vi

MOTTO

“Say : Nun. By pen and what they inscribe, you are not [ O Muhammad ] by the favor

of your lord a madman. And indeed for you is a reward uninterrupted. And indeed

you are of a great moral character.”1

1 Ayatal-quran.net/2016/08/surah-al-qalam-the-cave-terjemah-bahasa-inggris, Retrieved on

October 25th, 2016

Page 7: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

vii

DEDICATION

I would like to dedicate this thesis for all my beloved people:

1. My beloved parents, Mr. Mat Halim and Mrs. Mursyidah who have already

prayed and supported for my success, and advised me all the time.

2. My beloved brothers, Ilham Aripin, Rizki Sanjaya, and Pegi Ramadan who

always motivate me to succeed.

3. My beloved Almamater IAIN Raden Intan Lampung.

Page 8: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

viii

CURRICULUM VITAE

The writer’s name is Evi Fitria. She was born in Way Sindi on September 15th, 1995.

She is the first child of Mr. Mat Halim and Mrs. Mursyidah. She has three brothers.

She lives at Jalan Lintas Bengkulu Kelurahan Way Sindi, Kecamatan Karya

Penggawa, Pesisir Barat.

The writer began her study in Elementary School at SDN 1 Way Sindi Pesisir Barat

in 2000 and graduated in 2006. She continued her study in Junior High School at

SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat and Graduated in 2009. After that, she

continued her study to MAN 1 Krui Pesisir Barat and graduated in 2012. After

finishing her study in MAN, she decided to study in English Education Program of

Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty of State Institute of Islamic Studies Raden

Intan Lampung.

Page 9: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

ix

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all, all praise be to Allah, the most merciful, the most beneficent, for His

blessing and mercy given to the writer during her study and in completing this final

project. Then, the best wishes and salutation be upon the great messenger prophet

Muhammad S.A.W

This thesis presented to the English Education study program of IAIN Raden Intan

Lampung. The primary aim of writng this thesis is to fulfill a part of students’ task in

partial fulfillment of the requirement to obtain S1-degree.

For that reason, the writer would like to thank the following people for their ideas,

time and guidance for this thesis:

1. Dr. H. Chairul Anwar, M.Pd, the Dean of Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher

Training and his staff who have given and opportunity and the help for the

writer when on going the study until the accomplishment of this thesis.

2. Meisuri, M.Pd, the Chairwoman of English Education Study Program of IAIN

Raden Intan Lampung who has given help to complete this thesis.

3. Bambang Irfani, M.Pd, the advisor who patiently guided the writer until the

completion of this thesis.

4. Nunun Indrasari, M.Pd, the co-advisor has guided the writer a lot until the

finishing of this thesis.

Page 10: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

x

5. All lecturers of English Department of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty

who have taught the writer since the first of her study.

6. Markoni S.Pd the headmaster of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat,

Melda Wati S.Pd, the English teacher, all administration staff and the eighth

grade students of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat for allowing her to

carry out the research in their institution.

7. Her beloved father, Mr. Mat Halim and mother, Mrs. Mursyidah, as well as

her beloved brother for their support, love, and everything that she cannot tell

all in words.

8. Her beloved friends, especially friends in class D who gave greately

contribution toward the completion of this thesis.

Finally, the writer is fully aware that there are still a lot of weaknesses in this thesis.

For this, the writer truthfully expects criticism and suggestion from the readers to

enchance the quality of the thesis.

Bandar Lampung, 20 October 2016

The Writer

Evi Fitria

NPM. 1211040102

Page 11: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

xi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

COVER .................................................................................................................... i

ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ ii

APPROVAL ........................................................................................................... iii

ADMISSION ........................................................................................................... iv

DECLARATION ..................................................................................................... v

MOTTO .................................................................................................................. vi

DEDICATION ......................................................................................................... v

CURRICULUM VITAE ........................................................................................ vi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................... vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................... ix

LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................ xii

LIST OF FIGURE ................................................................................................ xiii

LIST OF APPENDICES ...................................................................................... xiv

CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION

A. Background of the Problem ...................................................................... 1

B. Identification of the Problem .................................................................... 7

C. Limitation of the Problem ........................................................................ 7

D. Formulation of the Problem ...................................................................... 7

E. Purpose of the Research ........................................................................... 8

F. Use of the Research .................................................................................. 8

G. Scope of the Research............................................................................... 9

1. Subject of the Research .................................................................... 9

2. Object of the Research ...................................................................... 9

3. Time of the Research ......................................................................... 9

4. Place of the Research......................................................................... 9

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

A. Concept of Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language ........ 10

B. Concept of Grammar ................................................................................ 12

C. Concept of Tenses .................................................................................... 14

Page 12: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

xii

D. Concept of Simple Present Tense ............................................................. 16

1. Definition of Simple Present Tense .................................................. 16

2. Use of Simple Present Tense............................................................. 17

3. Form of Simple Present Tense .......................................................... 19

4. Time Signal of Simple Present Tense ............................................... 21

5. Simple Present Tense Mastery .......................................................... 22

E. Concept of Writing ................................................................................... 23

1. Definition of Writing......................................................................... 23

2. Writing Process ................................................................................. 24

3. Writing Ability .................................................................................. 25

F. Concept of Text ........................................................................................ 27

1. Kind of Text ...................................................................................... 29

G. Concept of Descriptive Text ..................................................................... 32

1. Definition of Descriptive Text .......................................................... 32

2. Generic Structure .............................................................................. 33

3. Linguistics Features .......................................................................... 34

4. Descriptive Text Writing Ability ...................................................... 34

H. Frame of Thinking .................................................................................... 35

I. Hypothesis ................................................................................................ 36

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A. Research Design. ...................................................................................... 37

B. Variable of Research ................................................................................ 38

C. Operational Definition of Variable ........................................................... 38

D. Population, Sample, and SamplingTechnique .......................................... 39

1. Population .......................................................................................... 39

2. Sample ............................................................................................. ..40

3. Sampling Technique .......................................................................... 40

E. Data Collecting Technique ....................................................................... 41

F. Try Out ..................................................................................................... 41

G. Instrument of the Research ....................................................................... 42

H. Scoring Procedure .................................................................................... 46

I. Research Procedure .................................................................................. 46

J. Validity, Reliability, and Readability of the Test ..................................... 48

1. Validity of the Test ............................................................................ 48

2. Reliability of the Test ........................................................................ 51

Page 13: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

xiii

3. Readability of the Test....................................................................... 53

K. Data Analysis ............................................................................................ 53

1. Prerequisite Test ................................................................................ 53

a. Normality Test ............................................................................ 53

b. Linearity Test ............................................................................. 54

2. Hypothetical Test............................................................................... 55

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION

A. Findings .................................................................................................... 57

1. Data Analysis..................................................................................... 57

2. Result of the Test ............................................................................... 57

a. Result of Simple Present Tense Mastery Test ............................ 57

b. Result of Writing Descriptive Text ............................................ 59

3. Result of Data Analysis ..................................................................... 61

a. Result of Normality Test ............................................................ 61

b. Result of Linearity Test .............................................................. 63

c. Result of Hypothetical Test ........................................................ 63

B. Discussion ................................................................................................. 65

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusion ................................................................................................ 70

B. Suggestion ................................................................................................ 70

REFERENCES

APENDICES

Page 14: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

xiv

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 1 Students’ Score of Writing Descriptive Text ................................................. 4

Table 2 Students’ Score of Simple Present Tense ...................................................... 6

Table 3 The Scoring of Writing work by Tribble ...................................................... 26

Table 4 Population of Students .................................................................................. 39

Table 5 Specification of Try Out Test of Simple Present Tense Mastery ................. 43

Table 6 Specification Test of Simple Present Tense Mastery.................................... 44

Table 7 Criteria of Reliability .................................................................................... 52

Table 8 Normality of Simple Present Tense Mastery ................................................ 62

Table 9 Normality of Writing Descriptive Text ......................................................... 62

Table 10 Result of Hypothetical Test ........................................................................ 64

Page 15: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

xv

LIST OF FIGURES

Page

Figure 1 Result of Simple Present Tense Mastery Test ............................................. 58

Figure 2 Result of Writing Descriptive Text Test ...................................................... 60

Page 16: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

xvi

LIST OF APPENDICES

Page

Appendix 1 Result of Interview for English Teacher ................................................ 77

Appendix 2 Result of Interview for English Students ............................................... 78

Appendix 3 Syllabus .................................................................................................. 83

Appendix 4 Instrument of Try out Simple Present Tense Mastery Test .................... 89

Appendix 5 Instrument of Simple Present Tense Mastery Test ................................. 98

Appendix 6 Instrument Writing Descriptive Text Test............................................. 105

Appendix 7 Scoring Writing by Tribble ................................................................... 106

Appendix 8 Validation Form for Simple Present Tense Mastery ............................. 107

Appendix 9 Validation Form for Writing Descriptive Text ..................................... 108

Appendix 10 Result of Reliability Test ..................................................................... 109

Appendix 11 Instrument of Readability Test ............................................................ 113

Appendix 12 Result of Readability Test ................................................................... 114

Appendix 13 Students’ Name of Try Out ................................................................. 115

Appendix 14 Students’ Name of Sample .................................................................. 116

Appendix 15 Score of Try Out Simple Present Tense Mastery ................................ 117

Appendix 16 Score of Simple Present Tense Mastery Test ...................................... 118

Appendix 17 Score of Writing Descriptive Text ...................................................... 119

Appendix 18 Recapitulation Analysis Items Try Out Simple Present Tense ........... 120

Appendix 19 Recapitulation Analysis Items of Simple Present Tense Mastery ....... 124

Appendix 20 Descriptive Statistics for Simple Present Tense Mastery .................... 128

Appendix 21 Descriptive Statistics for Writing Descriptive Text ............................ 129

Appendix 22 Data Analysis ...................................................................................... 130

Page 17: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

A. Background of the Problem

Language is important in human life, people use language for communication

between one and another and also it is used to deliver message or ideas from the

speaker to the listener in interaction among themselves or with the environment.

Without language it is impossible for people or everyone to join interaction each

other in daily life or in learning something and also the human activities could not run

without language. Every country has a different language, we need an international

language for communication around the world.

English is one of international languages which is used throughout the world and also

English used in many fields of life such as: in politics, economics, sosial and

education. Therefore, English as a language in international communication is clearly

needed by many learners to deliver thought or idea in variety of situation.

In Indonesia, English is a foreign language that is taught formally from junior high

school through university level as a compulsory subject. According to Setiyadi,

“teaching the target language is seen as a mental discipline even though it is often

Page 18: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

2

claimed that the goal of the language teaching is to be able to read literature in this

original form.1

The goal of teaching and learning English is to make the students master English

skills. There are four English skills namely, speaking, reading, listening, and writing,

that should be mastered by the students. Writing is a psychological activity of the

language user to put information in the writing text.2 The written productive language

skill is called writing. It is skill of a writer to communicate information to a reader or

group of readers. Her or his skill is also realized by his or her ability to apply the

rules of the language s/he is writing to transfer information s/he has in her or his mind

to her or his readers(s) effectively.3

Writing is a process of communication which uses conventional; graphic system to

convey a message to reader. For many of foreign language learners, writing is

considered as the most difficult skill because in writing they have to combine the

correct grammatical and also the coherence of the paragraph.4

In writing there are many kinds of text. One of the texts is descriptive text.

Descriptive text is a text which is intended to describe a particular person, place or

1Ag. Bambang Setiyadi, Teaching English as a Foreign Language, (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu,

2006), p. 32 2Sanggam Siahaan, Issues In Linguistics (1st Ed), (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2007), p. 215 3Sanggam Siahaan, The English Paragraph (1st Ed), (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2008), p. 2 4Sanggam Siahaan, Generic Text Structure (1st Ed), (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2008), p. 3

Page 19: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

3

thing.5 It means descriptive text is a kind of text with a purpose to give information

about particular person, place or thing. “it differs from report which describes things,

animals, persons, or others in general. The social function of descriptive text is to

describe a particular person, place, or thing”.6 It can be concluded that descriptive

text is a type of text which describe particular person, animal or thing and report text

is a type of text which describe person, animal or thing in general.

Based on an interview with Melda Wati, S.Pd, as English Teacher in SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa Pesisir Barat in the preliminary research, she said that many students got

difficulties when they describe something. They looked difficult to arrange words

into sentences and becomes paragraph. They are just easy to describe something with

a vocabulary not sentence structure.7 Furthermore, based on the observation at SMPN

1 Karya penggawa Pesisir Barat, the writer found that there are many students who

still had low score of descriptive text. It is proven by the following data of writing

test at the eight grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017

academic year. Whereas, the criteria of minimum mastery score (KKM) of the school

is 75.

5Juanita Siahaan, An Analysis of Students’ Ability and Difficulties in Writing Descriptive

Text. Journal of Englis and Education. Vol.1.Issue 1. 2013, p.115, http://www.ejournal.upi.edu,

retrieved on April 2nd, 2016 6M Mursyid PW, English Learning Handout 2005, p. 4,

http://www.mmursyidpw.files.wordpress.com, retrieved on April 2nd, 2016 7Melda Wati, The Result with Interview to the English Teacher of Eighth Grade, retrieved on

March 3rd, 2016, Unpublished

Page 20: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

4

Table 1

The Students’ Score of Descriptive Text Test at the Second Semester of the Seventh

Grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in the Academic Year of 2015/2016

No. KKM The Number of Students Persentage

1. ≥70 48 39.67 %

2. <70 73 60.33 %

Total 121 100%

Source: Document of the Writing in Descriptive Text Score of Eighth Grade of SMPN 1

Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat 2015/2016.

Based on the table above, it can be seen that more than 60 % descriptive text score of

students was under the passing grade for English subject in SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa

Pesisir Barat. There were only 48 students from 121 students who passed the criteria

of minimum mastery (KKM). It shows that writing descriptive text ability of students

in SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2015/2016 academic year is still low.

In teaching and learning English as a foreign language it needs grammar to speak and

write correctly. The students need grammar in order to make good sentence.

Grammar is one of the components of language that must be mastered by the students

to learn English, because the grammatical rules of Indonesian language are different

from English. That is why, learning English grammar is very important to understand.

Brown says that grammar is a system of rules governing the conventional

arrangement and relationship of words in sentence.8 In other word grammar is one

8H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy

(2nd Ed), (New York: Longman, 1994), p. 347

Page 21: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

5

kind of language component that give explanation or rule about how to join of the

words become a good sentence based on grammatical rule.9

Grammar is also called as organization words that are combined into sentences to

express thought and feeling or to express of the idea in writing. In teaching English as

foreign language, the students need to master grammar because by mastering

grammar students will be able to speak and write English correctly. In mastering

English grammar there are many rules and sentences that should be mastered by the

students. One of sentences is simple present tense.

The simple present tense refers to action or situation that to do not change frequently.

It is used to describe habits or routines, to express opinions, or to make genenral

statements of fact, the simple present can also be used to refer to the future.10 It

means that simple present tense is one kind of sentence that is used to the express

daily activities and general statement. This sentence is used in descriptive text. As we

know in descriptive text often use simple present tense formula. According to Juanita,

Linguistic features of descriptive text are: use specific participant, written in present

tense, use linking verbs, use adjective, use relational and material process.11

Based on the interview with some students, they said that they were still confused

about tenses, the students still made many errors in using tenses. One of the tenses

9 Ibid. 10Patricia Werner, Mosaic 1 A Content-Based Grammar, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990), p.

125 11Juanita Siahaan, Op.Cit, p. 115

Page 22: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

6

that was regarded difficult by them is simple present tense. They found difficulties to

understand the subject verb agreement in simple present tense, the formula of simple

present tense, and the rule of verb in simple present tense. In conclusion the students

ability in simple present tense is still low.12 It can be seen in the table below:

Table 2

The Students’ Score of Simple present Tense Test at the Second Semester of the Seventh

Grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in the Academic Year of 2015/2016

NO KKM The Number of Students Percentage

1 ≥70 37 30.58 %

2 <70 84 69.42 %

Total 121 100 %

Source: Document of the Simple Present Tense Score of Eighth Grade of SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa Pesisir Barat 2015/2016.

Based on the table above, it can be seen that 84 students got score of simple present

tense lower that 70, and only 37 students that get score passed the KKM. Moreover,

from the table above it can be seen that there were many students had still not

understood about simple present tense. They faced difficulties in simple present tense.

Based on the background, the writer conducted a research entitled “The Correlation

Between Students’ Simple Present Tense Mastery and Their Ability in Writing

Descriptive Text at the First Semester of the Eighth Grade of SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic Year”

12Seventh Grade Students’, The Result with Interview to Students of Seventh Grade, retrieved

on March 3rd, 2016, Unpublished

Page 23: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

7

B. Identification of the Problem

Based on the problem above, the writer finds several problems as follows :

1. The students find difficulties to understand the subject verb agreement in

simple present tense.

2. The students find difficulties to understand the formula of simple present

tense.

3. The students find difficulties to understand the rule of the verb in simple

present tense.

4. The students find difficulties in writing descriptive text correctly based on the

grammatical rule.

5. The students find difficulties to arrange the sentence in writing descriptive

text.

6. The students find difficulties to understand the generic structure of descriptive

text.

C. Limitation of the Problem

In this research, the writer focuses on the correlation of students’ grammar mastery

and their ability in writing. The grammar used was focused on the simple present

tense mastery and writing was focused on the descriptive text.

Page 24: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

8

D. Formulation of the Problem

Based on the background of the problem above, the writer makes a formulation of the

problem as follows :

Is there a significant correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and

their ability in writing descriptive text at the first semester of the eighth grade of

SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic Year ?

E. Purpose of the Research

The purpose of this research is to know whether there is a correlation between

students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability in writing descriptive text at

the first semester of the eighth grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in

2016/2017 Academic Year.

F. Use of the Research

The uses of the research are as follows :

1. Theoretically

To give information to the readers about the correlation between students’ simple

present tense mastery and their ability in writing descriptive at SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa Pesisir Barat.

2. Practically

a. For the students

The result of this research can motivate the students in learning English

especially in simple present tense and descriptive text.

Page 25: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

9

b. For the teachers

The result of this research can give information for the teachers about the

correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability in

descriptive text.

c. For the school

The result of this research is expected to be able to motivate the school to

improve the quality of learning English.

G. Scope of the Research

1. Subject of the research

The subject of this research was the eighth grade students’ of SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa Pesisir Barat.

2. Object of the research

The object of this research was the correlation of students’ simple present

tense mastery and their ability in writing descriptive text.

3. Place of the research

The research was conducted at SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat.

4. Time of the research

The research was conducted at the first semester of 2016/2017 academic year.

Page 26: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

10

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

A. Concept of Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language

Since students use their mother language in their daily conversation, English teachers

has essential role to make students understand and enjoy the material. It is necessary

to make students comfort and enjoy in teaching and learning English. Language is the

situation whereby humans communicate and interact with one another by means of

habitually used oral auditory arbitory symbols. Many people use language to

communicate each other in their daily life. Language is also used to express the idea

as a share each people by using language through spoken and written form.

Language teaching is influenced by ideas on the nature language (language theories)

and the learning conditions that make learners to acquire the language (learning

theories).1 It means that English is different when English for communication and

English for teaching materials and methods. These differences may influence in

teaching English achievement.

Teaching is the process of showing or helping someone to learn how to do something,

giving instructions, guiding in the study of something, providing with knowledge, and

it is causing someone understand about something that learned.2 It describes that

1Ag. Bambang Setiyadi, Teaching English as a Foreign Language, (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu,

2006), p. 20 2H. Douglas Brown, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th Ed), (New York:

Addison Wesley Longman, 2000), p. 7

Page 27: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

11

teaching is a process to help the learners for understanding something that learned. In

this case the English teacher should be able to create a real situation that can be used

to support learning and teaching process in order thet the students are able to use

English naturally for communication. The students should be put into situation that

they can use English for communication both in written and spoken forms.

Further, according to Harmer that English as a foreign language is generally taken to

apply to students who are studying general English at schools and institutes in their

own country or as transitory visitors in a target language country.3 Meanwhile,

English generally has been learnt by the students since they were in the basic level of

education. It means that English as a foreign language is important, and is needed to

the English learner as a part their study in the school.

Based on the explanation above, it can be inferred that teaching English as a foreign

language is the process for helping the students to learn English and make their

understanding in learning process and do a lot of practice to master the English

language. In teaching English, the teacher should be creative to make the students are

interested in learning English as a foreign language.

3Jeremy Harmer, How to Teach Writing, (Harlow: Longman Group, 2004), p. 79

Page 28: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

12

B. Concept of Grammar

In teaching and learning English as a foreign language it needs grammar to speak and

write correctly. The students need grammar in order to make good sentence.

Grammar is one of the components of language that must be mastered by the students

to learn English. Because the grammatical rules of Indonesian language are different

from English. That is why, learning English grammar is very important to understand

English teacher. Brown says that grammar is a system of rules governing the

conventional arrangement and relationship of words in sentence.4 In other word

grammar is one kind of language component that give explanation or rule about how

to join the words become a good sentence based on grammatical rule.

The statement indicates that grammar is a set of rules derived from language rules

that most of its native speaker rarely care about. However, thesis enable them to

communicate each other without creating misunderstanding and misinterpretation.

They commonly do not realize, that when they express themselves trough writing or

speaking, what they write or speak have patterns and they keep subconsciously

applying the patterns in their communication.

Meanwhile in the context of education especially in the learning and teaching of

foreign language, grammar is usually considered one of the language components

other that vocabulary and sound system which students should acquire. As foreign

language learners commonly do not have much direct exposure to the language

4H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy:

2nd Edition, (New York: Longman, 1994), p. 347

Page 29: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

13

mastery. Language component is one of the ways to support the mastery of foreign

language skills. Harmer states grammar is not just concerned with syntax, however

the way words are formed - and can change their form in other to express different

meanings – is also at the heart of grammatical knowledge.5 Based on three statements

above, the writer assumes that by mastering grammar can help the students to

complete sentence correctly.

Grammar is also called as organization words that combination into sentences to

express thought and feeling or to express the idea in written. In teaching English as

foreign language, the students need to master grammar because by mastering

grammar students will be able to speak and write English correctly, it is fact that

different countries have different language and every language has system which is

called grammar. It also happened in translating, in order to competence in translating

we should know of the language structure. In English grammar, tenses play an

important role in sentence formation, the tense of a verb shows the time of an even or

action.6

Based on the theories above, grammar is rule how to make a good sentence that can

be understood by the reader. In English grammar there is an important part called

5Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching, (Edinburgh Gate: Longman,

2007), p. 32 6Paul Joseph, Grammar Simple Present Tense, http://www.englishleap.com/grammar.tense,

retrieved on April 2nd, 2016

Page 30: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

14

tenses. Tenses is a verb shows the time of an event or action, it is very important in

constructing a sentence and it should be mastered by the learners.

C. Concept of Tenses

In learning English as a foreign language, there is component called grammar. When

we learn grammar, the tenses will be automatically correlated. Tense means time.

However, it should be pointed out that time in relation to action is a concept that

exists in the mind of speaker, reader, or listener. Tense, in actual usage, refers

consistently only to grammatical forms. Often tense and time do not correspond at

all.7 It means that tense is the linguistic indication of the time of an action. In fact,

tense establishes a relation: it indicates the time of an event in respect to the moment

of speaking, reading or listening.

Tense is one of the important parts of structure in English. In teaching learning

English the teacher should make the students understand about tenses which are used

to make them able to make sentence because tenses are a verb form that are used in

certain time. So it must be mastered by the students. According to Lado, tense is form

of the verb that refers to change the time.8 It means that information of time that

difference can influence form of the verb used in the sentences. In English grammar

there are 16 kinds of tenses:

7George E. Wishon and Julia M. Burks, Let’s Write English, (North York: Van Nostrand

Reinhold Ltd, 1980), p. 192 8M.J Lado, Memahami Tenses Bahasa Inggris, (Jakarta: Titik Terang, 2008), p. 7

Page 31: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

15

1. Simple Present Tense

2. Present Continuous Tense

3. Present Perfect Tense

4. Present Perfect Continuous Tense

5. Simple Past Tense

6. Past Continuous Tense

7. Pas Perfect Tense

8. Past Perfect Continuous Tense

9. Simple Future Tense

10. Future Continuous Tense

11. Future Perfect Tense

12. Future Perfect Continuous Tense

13. Simple Past Future Tense

14. Past Future Continuous Tense

15. Past Future Perfect Tense

16. Past Future Perfect Continuous Tense

Each of these has a present, past, future, and past future form.9 It means that English

grammar has sixteen kinds of tenses, but in this research the writer will focus on

simple present tense.

9 Paul Joseph, Loc. Cit.

Page 32: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

16

According the definition above, tense is a particular form of a verb indicating the time

of an action or a state. It is also a grammatical category that locates a situation in time

that indicates the situation takes place. To have a good ability in writing descriptive

text, the learner or students should master the tenses well especially simple present

tense, because simple present tense is a sentence used in writing descriptive text.

D. Concept of Simple Present Tense

1. Definition of Simple Present Tense

The Simple Present Tense refers to action or situation that to do not change

frequently. It is used to describe habits or routines, to express opinions, or to make

genenral statements of fact, the simple present can also be used to refer to the

future.10

In English grammar, the simple present tense is a form of the verb that refers to an

action or event that is ongoing or that regularly takes place in present time (for

example, "He cries easily").11

The simple present tense is the one which we use when an action is happening right

now, or when it happens regularly (or unceasingly, which is why it’s sometimes

10Patricia Werner, Mosaic 1 A Content-Based Grammar, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990), p.

125 11Terry Willie, Simple Present Tense, http://grammar.about.com/od/rs/g/Simple-Present-

Tense.htm, retrieved on April 2nd, 2016

Page 33: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

17

called present indefinite). The simple present tense is formed by using the root form

or by adding -s or -es to the end, depending on the person.12

2. Use of Simple Present Tense

a. Repeated Actions

Use the Simple Present to express the idea that an action is repeated or usual. The

action can be a habit, a hobby, a daily event, a scheduled event or something that

often happens. It can also be something a person often forgets or usually does not

do.13

Examples:

1) The train leaves every morning at 8 AM.

2) The train does not leave at 9 AM.

3) When does the train usually leave?

4) She always forgets her purse.

5) He never forgets his wallet.

b. Fact or Generalization

12Betty Schrampfer Azar, Basic English Grammar (2nd Ed), (New York: Longman Group,

1941), p. 200 13Steven, Simple Present Tense, http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/simplepresent.html,

retrieved on April 2nd, 2016

Page 34: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

18

The Simple Present can also indicate the speaker believes that a fact was true before,

is true now, and will be true in the future. It is not important if the speaker is correct

about the fact. It is also used to make generalizations about people or things.14

Examples:

1) Cats like milk.

2) Birds do not like milk.

3) California is in America.

4) California is not in the United Kingdom.

5) Windows are made of glass.

c. Scheduled Events in the Near Future

Speakers occasionally use Simple Present to talk about scheduled events in the near

future. This is most commonly done when talking about public transportation, but it

can be used with other scheduled events as well.15

Examples:

1) The train leaves tonight at 6 PM.

2) The bus does not arrive at 11 AM, it arrives at 11 PM.

3) When do we board the plane?

4) The party starts at 8 o'clock.

5) When does class begin tomorrow?

14Ibid. 15Ibid.

Page 35: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

19

d. Now (Non-Continuous Verbs)

Speakers sometimes use the Simple Present to express the idea that an action is

happening or is not happening now. This can only be done with Non-Continuous

Verbs and certain Mixed Verbs.16

Examples:

1) I am here now.

2) She is not here now.

3) He needs help right now.

4) He does not need help now.

5) He has his passport in his hand.

6) Do you have your passport with you?

3. Form of Simple Present Tense

The following forms of simple present tense are:

a. Verbal

When the predicate is a verb, the sentence will be called “Verbal Sentence”.17

1) Positive form

Formula: S + Verb + (s/es) + O

Example: My father reads newspaper every morning.

I get up 5 O’clock every day.

2) Negative form

16Ibid. 17Betty Schrampfer Azar, Op. Cit, p. 168

Page 36: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

20

Formula: S + do/does + not + verb + O

Example: My father doesn’t read newspaper every morning.

I don’t get up 5 O’clock every day.

3) Interrogative form

Formula: Do/does + S + verb1 + O?

Example: Does my father read newspaper every morning?

Do you get up 5 O’clock every day?18

4) Negative Interrogative form

Formula: Do/does + not + S + verb1 + O?

Example: Doesn’t he speak English well?

Don’t you eat every day?

b. Nominal

When the predicate (in a sentence) is a noun, pronoun, noun phrase, adjective or

adverb, the sentense will be called “Nominal Sentence”.19

1) Positive form

Formula: S + to be + noun adjective/adverb

Example: The world is round.

Tom and I are students.

2) Negative form

Formula: S + to be + not + noun adjective/adverb

Example: My bed is not comfortable.

The shops are not open every morning.

3) Interrogative form

18M.J Lado, Op. Cit, p. 8 19Ibid.

Page 37: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

21

Formula: S + to be + not + noun adjective/adverb

Example: Is your parent at home?

Are these hotel expensive?

4) Negative Interrogative form

Formula: To be + not + S + noun adjective/adverb

Example: Aren’t you a doctor? Yes, I am/No, I am not.

Isn’t she a nurse? Yes she is/No, she isn’t.20

4. Time signals of Simple Present Tense

Time signal are words and phrases that tell us when an event takes place. Time

signals for the simple present tense identify more than just one event. Remember that

the simple present tense is used for repeated events.

a. Adverb of Time

Every day Every week Every month Every year

Every/each In the morning Once/twice a day Here/there

Note: adverb of time used in the first sentence or end sentence.

Example: You write a letter every day.

You do not write a letter every month,

Do you write a letter every year?

Don’t you write a letter twice a day.

b. Adverb of Frequency

Always Never Seldom

Often Now sometimes

20M.J Lado, Op. Cit, p. 18

Page 38: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

22

Note: adverb of frequency is often used before verb or after verb.21

Example: They usually study English.

They do not always study English.

Do they seldom study English?

Don’t they seldom study English?

Based on the statement above we can conclude that simple present tense is a sentence

construction which tells or shows the daily activities and general truth in the nominal

or verbal form of positive, negative, interrogative, and negative interrogative

sentences using its particular time signals.

5. Simple Present Tense Mastery

Mastery is a great skill or knowledge about something which is had by someone.

Meanwhile, Fullan defines that mastery is obviously necessary for effectiveness, but

it is also a means for achieving deeper understanding.22 It means that mastery is a

complete of having control over something superiority in through knowledge of a

subject. According to Messer, mastery is the broad knowledge and skill in

understanding the world of physical objects.23 It can be concluded that mastery is

have a broad skill of knowledge in understanding the objects.

21A. Faidal Rahman Ali, Fundamental of English Grammar a Practical Guide, (Yogyakarta:

Pustaka Widyatama, 2007), p. 252 22Michael G. Fullan, Why Teacher must Become Change Agents, Journal of Educational

Leadership, 1993, p. 4, http://www.sunyedl630.wikispace.com, retrieved on April 2nd, 2016 23David J. Messer, Mastery Motivation in Early Childhood, (London: Routledge, 2003), p.

230

Page 39: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

23

According to Werner, Simple Present Tense refers to action or situation that to do not

change frequently. It is used to describe habits or routines, to express opinions, or to

make genenral statements of fact, the simple present can also be used to refer to the

future.24 It means that simple present tense is sentence that use to express daily

activity, habitual, general statement, and it can also be used to express the future.

Based on those statement it can be concluded that simple present tense mastery is the

students’ skill to construct sentences which tell or show daily activities or general

truth in the nominal or verbal form of positive, negative, interrogative, and negative

interrogative sentences using its particular time signals.

E. Concept of Writing

1. Definition of Writing

Writing is a psychological activity of the language user to put information in the

writing text.25 The written productive language skill is called writing. It is skill of a

writer to communicate information to a reader or group of readers. Her or his skill is

also realized by his or her ability to apply the rules of the language s/he is writing to

transfer information s/he has in her or his mind to her or his readers(s) effectively.26

Writing is a process of communication which uses conventional; graphic system to

convey a message to reader. For many of foreign language learner, writing is

24Patricia Werner, Loc. Cit. 25Sanggam Siahaan, Issues In Linguistics (1st Ed), (Yogyakarta, Graha Ilmu, 2007), p. 215 26Sanggam Siahaan,The English Paragraph (1st Ed), (Yogyakarta:Graha Ilmu,2008),p. 2

Page 40: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

24

considered as the most difficult skill because in writing they have to combine the

correct grammatical and also the coherence of the paragraph.27

Writing is often characterized as a hierarchically organized goal directed problem

solving process. In writing consist of four main processes in writing they are

planning, writing, editing and reviewing.28 In writing skill have shown that an

instruction in each of these activities leads to better performance. To write a story or

paragraph well must use stages from planning through writing and editing to

reviewing.

Based on the theories above, the researcher can conclude that the definition of writing

is one of process to express the writer ideas, experience, thoughts and feelings

through writing.

2. Writing process

According to Harmer, there are four stages in the process of writing. There are:

1. Planning

Plan what they are going to write. When planning, writers have to think about

three main issues. In the first, place they have to consider the purpose. Secondly,

experienced writers think of the audience they are writing for. Thirdly, writers

have to consider the content structure.

27Sanggam Siahaan, Generic Text Structure (1st Ed), (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu,2008), p. 3 28James Hartley, Academic Writing and Publishing (1st Ed), (London: Routledge, 2008),

pp.10-11

Page 41: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

25

2. Drafting

The first version of a piece of writing as a draft. As the writing process proceeds

into editing, a number of drafts may be produced on the way to the final version.

3. Editing ( Reflecting and Revising)

The writers tend to look at issues of general meaning and overall structure before

concentrating on detailed features such as individual words and grammatical

accuracy.

4. Final Version

The writers is now ready to send the written text to its intended audience.29

Based on those statements it can be concluded that writing is not instant activity. It

need some process that should be know by the writer. To write a text the writer has to

do some process of writing , they are planning, drafting, editing, and final version.

3. Writing Ability

Writing ability is the skill of a writer to communicate information to a reader or group

of readers.30 It means that writing ability is the ability to express the ideas and

thought in writing clearly that must be mastered by the writer. In writing, there are

five aspects that must be ordered by writer. It is needed to give clearly of information

that as the writer means. Writing has some component that must be attended. Tribble

states there are five scoring criteria for scoring of writing ; they are:

29Jeremy Harmer,How to Teach Writing, (Harlow: Longman group ,2007), pp. 4-5 30Sanggam Siahaan, Op Cit, p. 2

Page 42: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

26

1. Content (the ability to think creatively and develop thoughts).

2. Organization (the ability to write in appropriate manner)

3. Vocabulary (the ability to use of word/idiom).

4. Language (the ability to write appropriate structure)

5. Mechanics (the ability to use punctuation, capitalization, spelling and

layoutcorrectly).31

To give the score of students’ writing ability the writer used the scoring of writing

work by Tribble. It can be seen on the table below:

Table 3

The Scoring of Writing work by Tribble

Areas Scores Descriptor

Content 30-27 Excellent to very good: knowledgeable - substantive.

26-22 Good to average: some knowledge of subject - little

substance.

21-17 Fair to poor: limited knowledge of subject - no stated.

16-13 Very poor: does not show knowledge of subject - non

substantive.

Organization 20-18 Excellent to very good: fluent expression – ideas clearly

stated.

13-10 Fair to good: non-fluent - ideas confused of disconnected.

9-7 Very poor: does not communicate - no organization.

Vocabulary 20-18 Excellent to very good: sophisticated range - effective

word/idiom choice and usage.

17-14 Good to average: adequate - occasional errors of

word/idiom form, choice, usage but meaning not

obscured.

13-10 Fair to poor: major problem in simple/complex

construction.

9-7 Very poor: essentially translation - little knowledge of

English vocabulary.

Language use 25-22 Excellent to very good: effective complex construction.

21-19 Good to average: effective but simple construction.

17-11 Fair poor: major problems in simple/complex

construction rules.

10-5 Very poor: virtually no mastery of sentence construction

rules.

Mechanics 5 Excellent to very good: demonstrates mastery of

31Christopher Tribble, Language Teaching Writing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), p.

130

Page 43: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

27

conventions.

4 Good to average: occasional errors in spelling,

punctuation.

3 Fair to poor: frequent errors in spelling, punctuation,

capitalization.

2 Very poor: non mastery of convention-dominated by

errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization,

paragraphing.

Source: Christoper Tribble, Language Teaching Writing, p. 135

It means that in doing writing, the students have to attend the five components of

writing in order to create good writing. Based on the explanation, it can be concluded

that writing ability is the ability to express ideas, feelings, and thoughts in written

form to transfer a message to the readers, by fulfilling the five important points of

writing including content, grammar, organization, vocabulary, and mechanics.

F. Concept of Text

Text have a structure, they are orderly grammatical of words, clauses and sentences,

and by following grammatical rules writers can encode a full semantic representation

of their intended meanings.32 Futher, language is always produced, exchanged or

received as a text that is language as a system of communication is organized as

cohesive units we call texts.33 It means that text is used as a communication by the

writer with organized the structure of the text and grammatical of words, clauses and

sentences.

32 Ken Hayland, Teaching and Researching Writing (2nd ed) (Edinburgh Gate: Pearson, 2009),

p.8. 33 Peter Knapp and Megan Watkins, Genre, text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and

Assessing Writing (Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd,2005), p.29.

Page 44: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

28

The text structure is how to produce and interpret a unified and coherent text and how

to select and use the correct grammatical aspects a certain unified and coherent text.34

According to emilia that a text has texture and good characteristic35, as follow:

a. Coherence

Coherense refers to a group clauses or sentences relate with the context. Coherence

divided into situational coherence and generic coherence. Situational coherenceis the

reader can identify the text as one of the kind text such as recount, procedure,

narrative, exposition, discussion, and can identify the structure in the text.

b. Cohesion

Cohesion refers to how the writer relates each part from the text.

Based on those explanation, it can be inferred that a good text is a text that relates

with the theme, use correct grammatical and generic structure appropriate with the

text, and can be understood by the reader.

In the subject material for Junior High School based on curriculum of 2013, there

have many kind of the text must be learnt by students. Further, Emilia said that the

kinds of the text must be taught to give knowledge for the students in writing, such as

descriptive, recount, narrative, procedure, report, exposition, explanation, news item.

Then, besides that the teacher must teach about the generic structure and grammatical

34 Sanggam Siahaan and Kisno Shinoda, Generic Text Structure ( Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2008),

p.3. 35 Emi Emilia, Pendekatan Genre-Based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris: Petunjuk untuk Guru

(Bandung: Rizqi, 2011), p.8.

Page 45: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

29

features from each the kind of the text above.36 It means that there have kinds of the

text must be taught for the students challenge to express their idea in writing with

follow the learning process about the above.

Based on these explanation, it can be concluded that the kinds of the text those must

be mastered by the students in writing for increase the students writing ability. In this

case, the researcher only focuses in students’ ability in writing descriptive text.

1. Kind of text

According to English Syllabus of School Based Curriculum (KTSP), the teaching of

writing for students of Senior High School involves the teaching of paragraphs or

text. In English, there are five kinds of English text in the teaching of wriring to SMA

of students. Each of these texts has its own characteristics and functions. Students

should have knowledge of these texts. The example below are the genre of the texts:37

a. Descriptive Text

Descriptive Text is a text that describes a particular person, place or thing. The

purpose of descriptive text is to describes people, place or something in specific.

Thefollowing is the generic stucture of descriptive text:

1) Identification, it is identify the subject or object to be described

2) Description, it gives information about the characteristics of an object.

36 Ibid,p.26.

37Otong Setiawan Djuharie, Essay Writing, (Bandung: YramaWidya, 2009), p. 153.

Page 46: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

30

b. Narrative Text

A narrative text is kind of text appropriate to tell activities or events in the past which

has purpose to amuse and give moral lesson to reader.38 The generic stucture of

narrative text are orientation, complication, evaluation, and resolution. While the

language feature as follows focuses on specific participant, use past tense, uses time

connective and conjunction uses saying verb. The example of narrative text are

cinderella, mouse deer and crocodile, and malin kundang.

c. Recount Text

Recount text is to retell events for the purpose of informating or intertaining, events

usually arranged in a tempopral sequence. Following is the generic stucture of

recount text:

1) Orientation (provides information about situation)

2) Record of events (present events in temporal sequence)

3) Re-orientation (optional stage bringing the events into present).39

d. Report Text

Report text is used to describe and classify information. Informative reports usually

talk or tell about living things like plants and animals and non-living things like

rivers, montains or oceans.

Following is the generic stucture of report text:

38 Pardiyono, Teaching Genre-Based-Writing (Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI, 2010), P.94. 39Otong Setiawan,Op.Cit, p. 171

Page 47: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

31

1) Classification of subject, (it introduces the subject of the report, general

declaration of the report and the classification).

2) Description (they are usually in paragraphs. They contain series of facts

about various aspect of the subject.40

e. Procedure Text

Procedure Text is instruction how to do and how to make something through a

sequence of step.41 The purpose of procedure text is to describe how something is

accomplished through a series of actions or steps.42 The generic structure are goal,

material, and steps. The language feature of procedure text are focus on general

human agents, use simple present tense, often imperative, use mainly of temporal

conjunction or numbering to indicate sequence, and use mainly of material process.

The example of procedure text are how to make sandwich, how to make a cup of

coffee, and how to make an omelet.

Based on these explanation, it can be concluded that there are many kinds of text in

teaching writing for student of senior high school and each student must be able to

understand the generic structure and language feature of the texts.

40Murkanto et al, English on the Sky for Senior High School Students Year XI, (Jakarta,

Erlangga, 2006), p. 135 41 Mark Anderson and Kathy Anderson, Text Type in English (South Yara: MacMillan

Education, 2003), p.51 42 Ibid, p.50

Page 48: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

32

G. Concept of Descriptive Text

1. The Definition of Descriptive Text

Text is a continuous piece of spoken or written language, especially one with a

recognizable beginning and ending. It means text is a part of spoken or written

language form. In addition, non-creative forms of writing, particularly essay writing,

have traditionally been classified into four types.43 Richard has cleared in the book

about list the four types of non-creative forms of writing as follows :

a. Descriptive writing as provides a verbal picture and account of a person, place

or thing. It ,means that descriptive writing is to describe the characteristic of

people, place or thing.

b. Narrative writing reports an event or tells the story of something that

happened.

c. Expository writing provides information about and explain a particular

subject. Pattern of development within expository writing include giving

examples, describing a process of doing or making something, analyzing

causes and effect, comparing and/or contrasting, defining a term or concept,

and dividing something into part or classifying it into categories.

d. Argumentative writing attempt to support a controversial point or defend a

position on which there is a difference of opinion, ESL writing programs have

often been based on the assumption that novice writers should begin with the

43R.I Trask, Key Concepts in Language and Linguistics. (London: Routledge. 1999), p. 208

Page 49: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

33

simplest mode-the descriptive essay, and gradually move to learning the most

difficult-the argumentative one.44

In addition, descriptive text is a text which is intended to describe a particular person,

place or thing.45 It means descriptive text is a kind of text with a purpose to give

information about particular person, place or thing. “it differs from report which

describes things, animals, persons, or others in general. The social function of

descriptive text is to describe a particular person, place, or thing”.46 It can be

concluded that descriptive text is a type of text which describes a particular person, or

thing.

2. Generic Structure

The generic structure of descriptive text consist of identification and description.

Identification is identifies phenomenon to be described. Description is describes

parts, qualities, characteristics, etc.47 it means descriptive text has two common

composition of text. Those are identification and description.

44Jack C. Richard Schmidt, Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, (New York: Longman,

1992), p.372 45Juanita Siahaan, An Analysis of Students’ Ability and Difficulties in Writing Descriptive Text.

Journal of Englis and Education. Vol.1.Issue 1. 2013,p.115, http://www.ejournal.upi.edu, retrieved on

April 2nd, 2016 46M Mursyid PW, Loc. Cit.

47Ibid, p. 5

Page 50: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

34

3. Linguistic Features

“Linguistic features of descriptive text are: use specific participant, written in present

tense, use linking verbs, use adjective, use relational and material processes”.48 It

means there are some linguistic features of descriptive text. Those are specific

participant, written in present tense, use linking verbs, use adjectives, use relational

and material processes. Thus, there is correlation between simple present tense and

descriptive text.

4. Descriptive Text Writing Ability

Writing ability is the skill of a writer to communicate information to a reader or group

of readers.49 It means that writing ability is the ability to express the ideas and

thought in writing clearly that must be mastered by the writer. In writing, there are

five aspects that must be ordered by writer. It is needed to give clearly of information

that as the writer means. It means that in doing writing, the students have to attend the

five component of writing in order to create good writing.

According to Siahaan descriptive text is a text which is intended to describe a

particular person, place or thing.50 It means descriptive text is a kind of text with a

purpose to give information about particular person, place or thing.

Based on the explanation, it can be concluded that descriptive text writing ability is

the ability to express ideas, feelings, and thoughts in written form to describe and

48Juanita Siahaan. Op. Cit, p. 115 49Sanggam Siahaan, Op. Cit, p. 2 50Juanita Siahaan. Op. Cit, p. 115

Page 51: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

35

give information about a particular person, place, or thing to the readers by fulfilling

the five important points of writing including content, grammar, organization,

vocabulary, and mechanics. Thus, in order to produce the good descriptive text the

students should have a good ability in writing.

H. Frame of Thinking

Teaching and learning English is the process to help the students to master English

both spoken and written. In mastering English the students should understand the

component and skill in English. Component and skills of language are very important

to be taught by the teacher and to be learnt by the students to increase their ability in

language. One of the language component is grammar. Grammar is rule how to make

a good sentences that can be understood by the reader. In English grammar there is an

important part called tense. Tense is a verb shows the time of an event or action, it is

very important in constructing a sentence and it should be mastered by the learners.

Tense is one important parts of structure in English. Simple present tense is one of the

English tenses that gives an idea that something occurred in the present. So, mastery

in simple present tense is reflected by the students’ ability to understand and to use

simple present tense correctly in the appropriate sense. Mastering of simple present

tense will help students to increase their language skill.

There are four skills in English, one of the skills is writing. There are many kinds of

writing, text that should be mastered by the learners. One of the text is descriptive

Page 52: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

36

text. As one of the English text descriptive text be mastered by the students.

Descriptive is kind of text tells about something or someone using simple present

tense, the linguistics features of descriptive text are: use specific participant, written

in present tense, use linking verbs, use adjective, use relational and material

processes. Descriptive text always use the simple present tense formula. It means that

if the students master of grammar more especially in simple present tense, they can

make descriptive text well. Therefore, the writer conducted the research to find out

whether or not there is a correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery

and their ability in writing descriptive text.

I. Hypothesis

Based on the frame of thinking above, the writer proposes the hypotheses as follows :

Ha: There is a correlation between students’ present tense mastery and their ability in

writing descriptive text.

Ho: There is no correlation between students’ present tense mastery and their ability

in writing descriptive text.

Page 53: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

37

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A. Research Design

The research design employed in this research was correlational research.

Correlational research is a quantitative method designed to show the relationships

between two or more variables.1 It means that correlational research is one research

designed that show the relationship of variables. According to Fraenkel and Wallen,

correlational research is also sometimes referred to as from of descriptive research

because it describes an existing relationship between two variables.2 In other words,

correlational research is also descriptive research. The design is illustrated as follows:

T1 T2

Where:

T1 = Independent variable

T2 = Dependent variable

The symbol T1 is an instrument of measure to obtain the data from the first variable

and T2 is an instrument to the data the second variable. So there are three possible

relationships between data from T1 and T2. The first possibility, the first variable

affects the second variable. The second possibility, the second variable affects the

1Marguerite G. Lodico, Dean T. Spaulding and Katherine H. Voegtle, Methods in Educational

Research: From Theory and Practice, (San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006), p. 14 2Jack R. Fraenkel and Norman E. Wallen, How To Design and Evaluate Research in

Education, (New York: Mc Grraw-Hill Book Co, 1932), p. 328

Page 54: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

38

first variable. The third possibility, there are variables that the unidentified affect first

and second variable.3 It means that between the first and second variable have a

relationship that affects both variables. Therefore, the research is only focused on

whether there is any correlation between students simple present tense mastery and

their ability in writing descriptive text or not.

B. Variable of Research

In this research there are two kinds of variables that investigated. Both of them are

dependent and independent variable, they are:

a. Independent variable is the students’ simple present tense mastery (X)

b. Dependent variable is the students’ ability in writing descriptive text (Y)

C. Operational Definition of Variable

1. Students’ Simple Present Tense Mastery

Student’ simple present tense mastery is the students’ skill to construct sentences

which tell or show daily activities or general truth in either the nominal or verbal

form of positive, negative, interrogative, and negative interrogative sentences

using its particular time signals.

2. Students’ Ability in Writing Descriptive Text

Students’ ability in writing descriptive text is the ability to express ideas, feelings,

and thoughts in written form to describe and give information about a particular

3Ag. Bambang Setiyadi, Metode Penelitian untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing Pendekatan

Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif, (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006), p. 145

Page 55: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

39

person, place, and thing to the readers by fulfilling the five important points of

writing including content, grammar, organization, vocabulary, and mechanics.

D. Population, Sample and Sampling Technique

1. Population

A population is the large groups to which one hopes to apply the result.4 It means that

population is all of the total number of research subject. In this research, the

population was taken from all the students of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat

at the Eighth Grade in 2016/2017 Academic Year. The number of population is 166

students in the eighth grade. It can be seen in the table below:

Table 4

The table of population based on the number and gender of eighth grade at SMPN 1

Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic Year

Clases Gender Total

Female Male

VIII A 20 10 30

VIII B 18 12 30

VIII C 16 14 30

VIII D 20 11 31

Total 74 47 121

Source: the data of total students of the eighth grade in SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir

Barat in 2016/2017 Academic Year.

4Jack R. Fraenkel and Norman E. Wallen, Op.Cit, p. 90

Page 56: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

40

2. Sample

Lodico, Dean, and Katherine states that sample is a smaller group selected from a

larger population that is representative of the larger population.5 So it can be

concluded that sample is smaller group as part of population and it is also chosen as

representative data of whole population. The sample in this research is a part

population of the eight grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat. In this

research, the writer used a sampling technique called cluster random sampling

because the classes are homogenous and the sample from group or class. The sample

of the research was taken from VIII A class. It can be seen appendix 14.

3. Sampling Technique

In this research, the writer was used cluster random sampling as sampling technique.

The selection of groups, or clusters, of subjects rather than individuals is known as

cluster random sampling.6 Cluster random sampling is similar to simple random

sampling expect that groups rather than individuals are randomly selected (that is, the

sampling unit is a group rather than an individual). The advantages of cluster random

sampling are that it can be used when it is often far easier to implement in schools,

and it is frequently less time-consuming. It is disadvantage is that there is a far greater

chance of selecting a sample that is not representative of the population.7 It can be

concluded cluster random sampling is procedure of sampling that uses a group as

5Marguerite G. Lodico, Dean T. Spaulding and Katherine H. Voegtle, Op.Cit, p. 143 6Jack R. Fraenkel and Norman E. Wallen, Op.Cit, p. 95 7Ibid.

Page 57: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

41

sampling than individual. The names of each class was written in a small piece of

paper and then these papers are rolled in put into a box, after that the box is shaken

abd then took one piece of paper as the sample of the research. It was gotten VIII A

as a sample of the research.

E. Data Collecting Technique

In collecting the data of this research, the writer used the following test:

1. Simple present tense mastery test

The objective test that is multiple choices test with four options a, b, c, and d. The

writer used objective test in the form of simple present tense, The total of the items

test is 40 items.

2. Writing descriptive text test

To know the students’ ability of writing descriptive text, the writer asked the students

make a text to describe about people, place, or thing.

F. Try Out

Test are required to be reliable and valid.8 Try out of the tests are conducted to

identify how valuable and effective the tests are before they would be used to collect

data of the research and to identify whether the test can be administered or not. It can

be seen from the result of reliability and validity of the test. Try out of the test was

conducted on October 7th, 2016, this test was given to the class VIII B. The try out

8David Scott & Marlene Morrison, Key in Educational Research, (New York: Continuum,

2006), p. 246

Page 58: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

42

was prepared in form of multiple choice questions in 50 items of simple present tense

mastery test, and make a text to describe in from essay of writing descriptive text test.

Then, the test item was evaluated to get good items that were tested in the test.

G. Instrument of the Research

Instrument is the whole process of preparing to collect the data.9 In this research the

writer applied objective and essay test as instrument for collecting the data. The

objective test was applied to find out the students’ simple present tense mastery and

the essay test to measure the students’ writing descriptive text. The construction of

the test described below:

a. Simple present tense mastery test

The simple present tense mastery test is in the form of multiple choices test with four

options; a, b, c, and d. Before the writer gave try out test to students, the instrument

consisted of 50 items and after try out test the instrument consisted of 40 items. The

classification of simple present tense can be seen in the table 5 and 6 below:

9Ibid, p. 110

Page 59: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

43

Table 5

The Spesification of Try Out Test for Simple Present Tense Mastery

No. Aspects Item Number

Odd Even Total

1. Nominal Sentence

a. Positive form 1, 3 2, 4 4

b. Negative form 5, 7 6, 8 4

c. Interrogative form 9, 11 10, 12 4

d. Negative Interrogative form 13 14, 16 3

2. Verbal Sentence

a. Positive form 15, 17 18, 20 4

b. Negative form 19, 21, 23 22, 24 5

c. Interrogative form 25, 27 26, 28 4

d. Negative Interrogative form 29, 31 30 3

3. Time Signals

a. Adverb of Time 33, 35, 37,

39, 41

32, 34, 36,

38, 40

10

b. Adverb of Frequency 43, 45, 47,

49

42, 44, 46,

48, 50

9

Total 25 25 50

Based on the table, it can be concluded that there were 50 question for try out simple

present tense mastery test. In nominal sentence positive, negative, interrogative, and

negative interrogative form, there were 7 odd question and 8 even question. The total

was 15 question. In odd question, they were 1, 3, 5, 7 , 9, 11, and 13 while and even

question, they were 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16. Then in verbal sentence positive,

negative, interrogative, and negative interrogative form there were 9 odd question and

7 even question. The total was 16 question. In odd question, they were 15, 17, 19, 21,

23, 25, 27, 29, and 31 while in even question, they were 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, and

30. And then, in time signals adverb of time and adverb of frequency, there were 9

Page 60: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

44

odd questions and 10 even questions. The total was 19 questions. In odd question

they were 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, and 49 while in even question they were 32,

34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, and 50.

Furthermore, the test items for test after try out were specification as follows:

Table 6

The specification after Try out Test for Simple Present Tense Mastery

No. Aspects Item Number

Odd Even Total

1. Nominal Sentence

e. Positive form 1, 3 2, 4 4

f. Negative form 5, 7 6, 8 4

g. Interrogative form 9, 11 10, 12 4

h. Negative Interrogative form 13 14, 16 3

2. Verbal Sentence

e. Positive form 15, 17 18, 20 4

f. Negative form 19, 21, 23 22, 24 5

g. Interrogative form 27 26 2

h. Negative Interrogative form 29, 31 30 3

3. Time Signals

c. Adverb of Time 35, 41 32, 34, 38 5

d. Adverb of Frequency 45, 47, 49 44, 48, 50 6

Total 20 20 40

Based on the table above, it can be concluded that there were 40 questions for test

simple present tense mastery. In nominal sentence positive, negative, interrogative,

and negative interrogative form there were 7 odd questions and 8 even questions. The

total was 15 questions. In odd questions, they were 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 while in

even questions, they were 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16. Then in verbal sentence

Page 61: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

45

positive, negative, interrogative, and negative interrogative form there were 8 odd

questions and 6 even questions. The total was 14 questions. In odd questions, they

were 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 27, 29, and 31 while in even questions, they were 18, 20, 22,

24, 26, and 30. And then, in time signals adverb of time and adverb of frequency

there were 5 odd questions and 6 even questions. The total was 11 questions. In odd

questions, they were 35, 41, 45, 47, and 49 while in even questions, they were 32, 34,

38, 44, 48, and 50.

b. Writing descriptive text test

The descriptive text test was given to measure the students’ writing descriptive text

ability. In this test, the writer prepared several pictures then the students were asked

to choose one of those pictures and write the descriptive text based on the picture

chosen. Before the writer give the test of writing descriptive test, the writer did

readability test to find out the valid instrument. In the readability test of writing

descriptive text, the writer asked the students out of the sample of the research to

answer the questionnaire. Question by crossing the correct answer after doing the

readability test, it was showed that the writing instrument was readable. It means that

the writing instrument can be used to measure the students’ descriptive text ability.

Page 62: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

46

H. Scoring Procedure

a. Simple Present Tense Mastery test

In scoring the simple present tense mastery test, a multiple choice test was used

consist of 40 items. The answer was scored 1 if it is correct and 0 it is incorrect.

S = 𝑟

𝑛 𝑥 100

Notes:

S = the score of the test

𝑟 = the total of the right answer

𝑛 = the total item10

b. Writing Descriptive Text test

Then, in scoring the students’ ability in writing descriptive text from Christoper

Tribble was used to calculate writing descriptive text test. The classification of

scoring criteria they are: content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and

mechanics can be seen appendix 7.

I. Research Procedure

Collecting data is the most important step in conducting the research. Based on

Creswell, there are six steps in conducting correlation study.11 The steps are as

follows:

10 Suharsimi Arikunto, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi pendidikan, (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2012), p.

187 11John W. Creswell, Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods

Approaches: 4th Edition, (London: Sage Publication, 2014), p. 254

Page 63: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

47

1. Determining the Subject

The writer determined the subject of the research, it was done in SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa Pesisir Barat.

2. Choosing the Sample

The writer chosen one class as the sample of this research by using cluster

random sampling technique.

3. Determining the Instruments

The writer determined the instruments of the research. In the form of multiple

choice test and writing test.

4. Giving the Try Out

The writer gave the try out to the students out the sample of the research, it is to

know the level of the validity and reliability of the instrument. After having the

validity and reliability of the instrument, next the writer was distributed the

instrument to collect the data for the sample of the research.

5. Analyzing the Data

The writer analyzed the data by using the formula.

6. Taking the Conclusion

The writer took the conclusion from the result of the research.

Page 64: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

48

J. Validity, Reliability, and Readability of the Test

1. Validity of the Test

Validity is the most important idea to consider where preparing or selection an

instrument for use.12 An instrument can be said valid when it can measure what it

wants to measure. In other words, an instrument can be said valid if it can show the

data of variables that are being research correctly. To know the validity of the test, it

was provided content, construct and internal validity. In this case, the validity of the

test was calculated by using anates. Anates is application program capable of

calculating the analysis for multiple choice and essay of items quickly, easily and

accurately.13 It means that anates is used to calculate the validity of the test for

multiple choice and essay of items quickly, easily and accurately.

a. Content validity

Best and Kahn say that content validity refers to the degree to which the test actually

measures, or is specifically related to, the traits for which it was design, content

validity is based upon the careful examination of course textbooks, syllabus,

objectives, and the judgments of subject matter specialists.14 It means that the content

validity is based on the material, and the material is agreement with the objectives of

learning. To get the content validity test, it was tried to arrange the material based on

12Jack R. Fraenkel and Norman E. Wallen, Op. Cit, p.147 13Muchammad Aruf, Jurnal Ilmiah: Penerapan aplikasi ANATES, (Madura: Universitas

Trunojoyo Madura, 2014), p. 5 14John W. Best and James V. Kahn, Research in Education (7th Ed), (New Delhi: Prentice-

Hall, 1995), p. 219

Page 65: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

49

the objectivitas of teaching in the school based on curriculum for eight grade of

SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat. The syllabus could be seen in Appendix 3.

b. Construct validity

Best and Kahn say that Construct validity is the degree to which scores on a test can

be accounted for by the explanatory constructs of a sound theory.15 It means that

construct validity is focused on the aspects of the test which can measure the ability

especially for writing descriptive text and simple present tense mastery. In this

research, a writing descriptive text test and simple present tense mastery test was

administrated with considered the scoring covers five aspect of writing descriptive

test they are, content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. Scoring

covers four aspect of simple present tense test has three aspect they are, nominal

sentence, verbal sentence, and time signal in positive, negative, interrogative, and

negative interrogative form.

In this research, a descriptive text test that was made to the measure the students’

ability writing descriptive text based on the scoring system by Christopher Tribble.

To make sure, the instrument was consulted the to the English teacher of SMPN 1

Karya Penggawa. The teacher is Melda Wati, S.Pd to make sure the validity of the

test is valid.

15Ibid.

Page 66: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

50

The validity of simple present tense mastery sheet and writing descriptive text sheet

were given to the English teacher as a validator. Validity was conducted in order to

see clarity of the aspect, direction of the test and to see clarity of the items. The

consultation was conducted before the try out that was held on September 30th, 2016.

The English teacher said that the instrument or items covered each aspect in the test

10 specification in simple present tense mastery test. Each of the items also was

suitable with the aspect in simple present tense mastery test, it can be seen in

appendix 8 and 9.

c. Internal Validity

Internal validity is observed differences on the dependent variable are directly related

to the independent variable, and not due to some other unintended variable.16 It

means that internal validity is used to evaluated whether variables affect each other.

To determine whether variables affect, the writer needs to do a treatment try out.17 In

this research, try out the test was conducted on October 7th, 2016. The try out the test

was prepared in form of multiple choice questions in 50 items of simple present tense

mastery test. The result of validity analysis shows that there were 40 items from 50

items.

Based on the result obtained in the anates, the result of validity test for simple present

tense mastery test showed that there were 40 items considered valid they were 1, 2, 3,

16Jack R. Fraenkel and Norman E. Wallen, Op. Cit, p. 166 17Ag. Bambang Setiyadi, Op. Cit, pp. 126-127

Page 67: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

51

4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29,

30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 38, 41, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50 items number. And the result of

validity test for simple present tense mastery test also show that there were 10 items

considered invalid they were 25, 28, 33, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42, 43, 46 items number.

Finally, the total valid items in try out were 40 items to second step as instrument for

test. The result of validity analysis for simple present tense mastery test can be seen

appendix 18 and 19.

2. Reliability of the Test

Fraenkel and Wallen say that reliability refers to the consistency of the scores

obtained-how consistent they are for each individual from one administration of an

instrument to another and from one set of items to another.18 A good test must have

high reliability besides having high validity. To get the reliability of the tests the

writer used anates and inter rater. Anates was used by the writer to know the

reliability of multiple choice test and inter rater was used to know the reliability of

writing test, it was done by two raters; English teacher and writer, the score of two

raters are summed up and then divided into two. The statistical formula for counting

the reliability is variants formula as follows:

𝜌 = 1 − 6 ∑ 2D

𝑁(𝑁2 − 1)

18Ibid, p. 154

Page 68: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

52

Notes:

𝜌 = the number of rank order correlation (rho)

6 and 1 = constant number

D = difference of rank correlation (D = R1 – R2)

N = the number students.

Furthermore, the criteria of reliability used to know the degree or the level of the

reliability of writing test. The criteria as follows:

Table 7

Criteria of Reliability

0.800 – 1.000 Very high

0.600 – 0.800 High

0.400 – 0.600 Medium

0.200 – 0.400 Low

0.00 – 0.200 Very low19

Based on the result obtained in the Anates of reliability that reliability test in simple

present tense mastery was 0.92 and writing descriptive text was 0.87. It can be

concluded that reliability of simple present tense mastery was very high, reliability of

writing descriptive text was high and both of them were reliable. It can be seen in

appendix 10 and 19.

19Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta,

2006), p. 319

Page 69: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

53

3. Readability of the Test

Readability test are indicator that measure how easy the direction and instruction can

be read and understood. For evaluators, readability statistics can be solid predicators

of the language difficulty level or particular document. The essential information in

an evaluation document should be easily understandable. 20 Kouname’s research used

to know readability of the students’ writing ability in descriptive text test instrument.

The participants asked to evaluate instructions and understandability of each item on

a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 describes an item that is easy to read and 10 describes an

item that is difficult to read.21 The questions was tested individually. The

questionnaire for readability was attached and the result of readability test was 1.77.

based on the category, the readability of writing descriptive text test was easy to read.

It can be seen in appendix 11 and 12.

K. Data Analysis

1. Prerequisite Test

a. Normality Test

The Normality test are supplementary to the graphical assessment of normality.22 It means

that normality is used to know whether the data have normal distribution or not. In this

research the writer used statistical computation by using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social

20Julien B. Kouame, Using Readability Test to Improve the Accuracy of Evaluation

Documents Intended For Low-Literate Paarticipants, Journal of Multy Desciplinary Evaluation, Vol.6,

Number 1 ISSN 1556-8180 August 2010, http://www.jmde.com/, retrieved on April 2nd, 2016 21Ibid. 22Asghar Ghasemi, Saleh Zahediasl, Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for

Non-Statisticians, International Journal, Tehran: Int J Endocrinol Metab 2012, p. 2,

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, retrieved on October 11th, 2016

Page 70: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

54

Science) of version 16 was used for normality test. SPSS is a comprehensive system for

analyzing data. SPSS can take data from almost any type of file and use them to generate

tabulated reports, charts and plots of distributions and trends, descriptive statistics and

complex statistical analysis.23 It means that SPSS is a program that can be used to

perform data entry and analysis to create tables and graphs. The result of normality

test can be seen appendix 22. In this case, the criteria of normality test as follow:

The hypotheses formulas are:

Ho: The data are normally distributed.

Ha : The data are not normally distributed.

While the criteria acceptance or rejection of normality test are

Ho is accepted if sig > α = 0.05

Ha is accepted if sig < α = 0.05

b. Linearity Test

Linearity test is used to know the size of the linear relationship between two variables

x and y. before analyzing the data by using Pearson’s product moment formula, the

first checked out whether the data obtained were linear or not because this was one of

requirements to be able to use the Pearson’s product moment formula. In this case,

Linearity test used SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) to check it in order

to make the writer easy. Then the result of linearity checked by comparing with

23Marija Norusis, SPSS Base 16.0 User’s Guide, (Chicago: Prentice Hall, 2007), p. 3

Page 71: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

55

significant level (α = 0.05). If the result was lower than α, it means that the data were

linear.

c. Hypothetical test

The hypothesis is very important to find out whether or not the alternative hypothesis

(Ha) or null hypothesis (Ho) is accepted in this research. Non parametric statistics,

rank spearman’s formula was used for hypothesis test. Rank spearman’s formula is

used to find the relationship between two variables, but there are unmet requirements

for using pearson’s correlation. The requirements include the data was not of value,

or the data not have a normal distribution.24 It means that rank spearman’s formula is

an alternative from paramentric test bivariate correlation (pearson’s correlation) to

find the relationship between two variables that not have normal distribution. In this

research, rank spearman’s formula was used for the hypothesis test because a result of

one of the data that is present tense mastery test did not have a normal distribution. It

can be seen appendix 22.

In this case, statistical computation by using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social

Science) of version 16 was used for hypothetical test. The purpose of using SPSS of

version 16 in this case was for practicality and efficiency in the study. While the

criteria acceptance or rejection of normality test are:

Ha is accepted if sig < α = 0.05

Ho is accepted if sig > α = 0.05

24Ag. Bambang Setiyadi, Op. Cit. p. 204

Page 72: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

56

The hypotheses are:

Ha = There is a correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their

ability in writing descriptive text at the first semester of the eighth grade at

SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic Year.

Ho = There is no correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and

their ability in writing descriptive text at the first semester of the eighth grade

at SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic Year.

Page 73: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

57

CHAPTER IV

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

A. Findings

1. Data Analysis

To analyze the data, SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 16 is

used to get the result of the simple present tense mastery, result of the ability in

writing descriptive text, result of the normality test, and result of the linearity test. In

this case, non parametric statistics, rank spearman’s formula by using SPSS

(Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 16 was used to getting the result

of the hypothesis testing. It used rank spearman’s formula because a result of one of

the data that is simple present tense mastery test did not have a normal distribution.

2. Result of the Tests

a. Result of the Simple Present Tense Mastery

The test was conducted in order to see students’ ability in simple present tense

mastery. The test was administered in SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat on

October 10th, 2016. The minimum score was 30 and the maximum score was 88.

There was 1 student who got the score 30. One student got the score 88. Eighteen

students got the score lower than 70 and 10 students got the score higher than 70. The

mean of the simple present tense mastery test is 62. It can be seen in appendix 16.

Page 74: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

58

Figure 1

Result of the Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

presenttense Stem-and-Leaf Plot

Frequency Stem & Leaf

1.00 3 . 0

4.00 4 . 0555

5.00 5 . 00055

9.00 6 . 000055555

7.00 7 . 0055555

4.00 8 . 0058

Stem width: 10

Each leaf: 1 case(s)

Page 75: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

59

Based on figure 1, it can be seen that there were 19 students who got under average

scores and 11 students got a good scores over average score 70 (Standar Minimum of

Criteria).

b. Result of Ability in Writing Descriptive text Test

The test was conducted in order to see students’ ability in writing descriptive text.

The test was administered in SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat on October 10th,

2016. The minimum score was 65 and the maximum score was 75. There were 2

students who got the score 65. Five students got the score 75. Four students got the

score lower than 70 and 19 students got the score higher than 70. The mean of writing

descriptive text test is 71. It can be seen appendix 17.

Page 76: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

60

Figure 2

Result of the Writing Descriptive text Test

descriptivetext Stem-and-Leaf Plot

Frequency Stem & Leaf

2.00 Extremes (=<65.0)

4.00 68 . 0000

.00 69 .

9.00 70 . 000000000

.00 71 .

8.00 72 . 00000000

.00 73 .

2.00 74 . 00

5.00 75 . 00000

Stem width: 1

Each leaf: 1 case(s)

Page 77: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

61

Based on figure 2, it can be seen that there were 6 students who got score under

average scores and 24 students got a good scores over average score 70 (Standar

Minimum of Criteria).

B. Result of Data Analysis

1. Result of Normality Test

The normality test is used to measure whether the data in the simple present tense

mastery class and writing descriptive text class were normally distributed or not. In

this research, statistical computation by using SPSS (Statistical Package for the

Social Sciences) was used for normality of test. The test of normality employed was

Shapiro Wilk. Ho is accepted if Sig (pvalue) > α.= 0.05. In this case, the criteria of

normality test as follows:

The hypotheses formula are :

Ho = The data have normal distribution.

Ha = The data do not have normal distribution.

While the criteria acceptance or rejection of normality test are:

Ho was accepted if Sig. > α = 0. 05

Ha was accepted if Sig. < α = 0. 05

Page 78: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

62

Table 8

Normality of the Simple Present Tense Mastery

Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic Df Sig.

Simple

Present tense .976 30 .713

Table 9

Normality of the Writing Descriptive text

Based on Table 8 and Table 9, it can be seen that Sig (pvalue) for simple present tense

mastery was .713. Sig (pvalue) for translating narrative text was .029. Because Sig

(pvalue) of writing descriptive text lower than 0.05 it means Ho was distribution

accepted. The conclusion was that the data in writing descriptive text was not normal

and for simple present tense mastery had normal distribution. As the result in this

case, the writer did not analyse person product moment test but the analysed the

hypothesis test by using non-parametric statistics using Rank Spearman’s Formula.

Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic Df Sig.

Writing

Descriptive

Text

.921 30 .029

Page 79: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

63

2. Result of Linearity Test

Before analyzing the data by using Pearson product moment formula, the first

checked out whether the data obtained were linear or not because this was one of

requirements to be able to used the Pearson product moment formula such in the

explanation in chapter three. SPSS used to check it in order to make the researcher

easy because this program could make a clear graph of linearity. Based on the table,

the data were linear (see Appendix 22) for the significant level was lower than

significant level (α) (0.00 < 0.05).

3. The Result of Hypothetical Test

The hypothesis is very important to find out whether or not the alternative hypothesis

(Ha) or null hypothesis (Ho) is accepted in this research. The Rank Spearmans’

formula by using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) was computed

for testing hypothesis. In this case, the criteria of hypothesis test as follows:

The hypothesis formulas were:

H𝑎 ∶ There was significant Correlation Between Students’ Simple Present Tense

Mastery and their Ability in Writing Descriptive Text at the First Semester of

the Eighth Grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017

Academic Year.

HO : There was no significant Correlation Between Students’ Simple Present Tense

Mastery and their Ability in Writing Descriptive Text at the First Semester of

Page 80: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

64

the Eighth Grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017

Academic Year.

While the criteria acceptance or rejection of hypothesis tests are:

Ho was accepted if Sig. > α = 0.05

Ha was accepted if sig. < α = 0.05

Table 10

Result of Hypothetical Test

Nonparametric Correlations (Rank Spearman’s)

Correlations

Present tense

mastery

Writing descriptive

text

Spearman's rho Past tense Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .557**

Sig. (2-tailed) . .001

N 30 30

Translating Correlation Coefficient .557** 1.000

Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .

N 30 30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Based on the results obtained in the Rank Spearman’s Formula, it was clear that the

value of significant generated Sig (pvalue) = 0.001 < α = 0.05. Thus, Ho was rejected

and Ha was accepted. Based on the computation, it can be concluded that there was

positive Correlation Between Simple Present Tense Mastery and their Ability in

Page 81: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

65

Writing Descriptive Text at the First Semester og the Eighth Grade of SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic Year.

C. Discussion

Based on the result of research, it had shown that simple present tense mastery

positively correlated with students’ ability in writing descriptive text. Based on the

result above, it can be seen that the result was higher. Besides that, simple present

tense mastery can improve each aspects of students’ ability in writing descriptive text.

At the beginning of activity, the try out was conducted in SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa

Pesisir Barat on October 7th, 2016. Try out test was given to 30 students of the eighth

grade out of the sample. The writer prepared 50 items of multiple choice questions for

simple present tense mastery. And three pictures for writing descriptive text test. It

has purpose to know how accurate and effective the test before they were used to

collect the data of research and identify whether the test can be given or not. Then,

the test items were evaluated to get good items that were tested in the test. It can be

seen from the result of validity and reliability of the tests. After knowing the result of

validity and reliability test from try out, it can be seen that the result of try out based

on anates and inter rater showed that the instrument was valid and reliable.

The number of the result of items validity for simple present tense mastery test that

was valid 40 items from 50 items. The result of validity test for writing descriptive

text test showed the items were valid. In this research, the writer used picture as

Page 82: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

66

instrument of writing test with describe a particular person, place or thing. Based on

the result obtained in the anates of reliability that reliability test in simple present

tense mastery was 0.92 and writing descriptive text was 0.71. It can be concluded that

reliability of simple present tense mastery was very high, reliability of writing

descriptive text was high and both of them were reliable. Thus, it can be used for test.

At the end of the research, simple present tense mastery test and writing descriptive

text test were given to know the correlation among the variables. It was conducted in

SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat on October 10th, 2016. The test was given the

30 students from 121 populations. The sample of the research was taken from class

VIII A. In collecting the data, it was used objective test that were multiple choices

consisted of 40 items test and writing descriptive text test consisted of describing a

particular person, place or thing. In this case, the students descriptive text that during

60 minutes for time allocation.

To analyze the data, SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 16

was used to getting the result of the simple present tense mastery, result of the

writing descriptive text, result of the normality test, result of linearity test and result

of the hypothetical test. In this case, non parametric statistics, rank spearman’s

formula by using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social the Sciences) version 16 was

used to getting the result of the hypothetical testing. It used rank spearman’s formula

because a result of one of the data that is simple present tense mastery test not have a

Page 83: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

67

normal distribution. The purpose of using SPSS of version 16 in this case was for

practicality and efficiency in the study.

Based on the results obtained by using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social

Sciences) version 16, The result of simple present tense mastery test was conducted

in order to see students’ ability in simple present tense mastery. The minimum score

was 30 and the maximum score was 88. There was 1 student who got the score 30, 1

student got the score 88, 18 students got the score lower than 70 and 10 students got

the score higher than 70. The mean of the simple present tense mastery test is 62. It

can be seen that were 19 who get under average scores and 11 students get a good

scores over average score 70 (Standar Minimum of Criteria).

Writing descriptive text test was conducted in order to see students’ ability in writing

descriptive text. The minimum score was 65 and the maximum score was 75. There

were 2 students who got the score 65, 5 students got the score 75, 4 students got the

score lower than 70 and 19 students got the score higher than 70. The mean of writing

descriptive text test is 71. It can be seen that were 6 students who got score under

average scores and 24 students get a good scores over average score 70 (Standar

Minimum of Criteria).

The result of the data analysis showed that the value of significant generated Sig

(pvalue) = 0.000 < α = 0.05. It means that there was positive correlation between two

variables. In this research, the independent variable, simple present tense mastery (X)

Page 84: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

68

was highly influenced by the variable dependent variable, the ability of writing

descriptive text (Y). And dependent variable, the ability of writing descriptive text

(Y) was also highly influenced by the variable Y.

By seeing the result of the data calculation in the previous chapter, it was showed that

the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was consequently accepted, it means that there was

positive correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

in writing descriptive text at the first semester of the eighth grade of SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic year. In other words, the null

hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It means

that there was positive correlation between Simple Present Tense Mastery and their

Ability in Writing Descriptive Text at the First Semester of the Eighth Grade of

SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic Year. Based on this

research, it was suggested that to have a good in writing descriptive text, students

should have a good mastery of present tense. It was supported by the previous

research that was conducted by Tarmizi about the correlation between present tense

mastery and translating descriptive text amongst the eleventh grade students of

SMAN 1 Seunuddon Banda Aceh. The result of research has shown that there is

positive correlation between present tense mastery and the ability of writing

Page 85: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

69

descriptive text.1 Thus, it indicates the connection between grammar especially

present tense and writing ability in descriptive text is significant.

1 Tarmizi, The Correlation between Present Tense Mastery and Translating Descriptive Text

Amongst the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Seunuddon Banda Aceh, 2009, A Thesis

Page 86: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

70

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

A. Conclusions

After conducting the research and analyzing the data, the writer draws a conclusion as

follows:

There was positive correlation between simple present tense mastery and their ability

in writing descriptive text at the first semester of the eighth grade of SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa Pesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic year. Based on the result of the data

calculation in the previous chapter, null hypothesis (Ho) was not accepted, and

alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. Those the writer’s assumption was revealed

simple present tense mastery and writing descriptive text are correlated significantly.

Rank Spearman’s formula by using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social

Sciences) showed the result obtained that the value of significant generated Sig (P

value) = 0.000 < α = 0.05. It can be revealed from the hypothesis testing.

B. Suggestions

Based on the conclusion above, the writer gave some suggestions as follows:

1. For the Teacher

It is essential that the teacher knows that one of the factors affect the students’

ability in writing descriptive text is the students’ mastery of structure of simple

present tense.

Page 87: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

71

2. For the Students

Based on the result of the research showed that many of students at the eighth

grade of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat found difficulties in using the

verb in the simple present tense form. Thus, the writer suggests that learning of

simple present tense is one way to make easier to writing descriptive text.

3. For Next Researcher

The writer hopes, this research can give an advantage of simple present tense and

writing for student to urge them to study more deeply about simple present tense

and writing especially about writing descriptive text.

Page 88: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

REFERENCES

Ali, A Faidal Rahman. 2007. Fundamental of English Grammar a Practical Guide.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama

Anderson, Mark and Kathy Anderson. 2003. Text Type in English. Shouth Yara:

Macmillan Education.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:

Rineka Cipta.

Aruf, Muhammad. 2014. Jurnal Ilmiah: Penerapan Aplikasi ANATES. Madura:

Universitas Trinojoyo Madura.

Azar, Betty Schrampfer. 1941. Basic English Grammar (2nd Ed). New York:

Longman Group.

Best, John W and James V Kahn. 1995. Research in Education (7th Ed). New Delhi:

Prentice-Hall.

Brown, H Douglas. 1994. Teaching by Principles an Interactive Aproach to

Language Pedagogy (2nd Ed). New York: Longman.

_______________. 2000. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th Ed).

New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed

Methods Approaces (4th Ed). London: Sage.

Djuharie, Otong Setiawan. 2009. Essay Writing. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Emilia, Emi. 2011. Pendekatan Genre-Based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris.

Bandung: Rizqi.

Fraenkel, Jack R. and Norman E. Wallen. 1932. How To Design and Evaluate

Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

Fullan, G Michael. 1993. Why Teacher Must Become Change Agents. Ontorio:

Journal of Education Leadership. http://www.sunyedl630.wikispace.com,

retrieved on April 2nd, 2016.

Page 89: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Ghasemi, Asgar, Zahediasl, Saleh. 2012. International Journal: Normality Tests for

Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians. Tehran: Int J Endocrinol

Metab.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. How to Teach Writing. Harlow: Longman Group.

____________. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Edinburgh Gate:

Longman.

Hartley, James. 2008. Academic Writing and Publishing (1st Edition). London:

Routledge.

Hayland, Ken. 2009. Teaching and Researching Writing (2nd Ed). Endinburgh Gate:

Pearson.

Hughes, Arthur. 2003. Testing for Language Teacher (2nd Edition). Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Joseph, Paul. Grammar Simple Present Tense.

http://www.englishleap.com/grammar.tense. retrieved on April 2nd, 2016.

Knapp, Peter and Megan Watkins. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Teaching for

Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney: Unibersity of New South Wales

Press.

Kouame, B Julien. 2010. Using Readability test to improve the Accuracy of

Evaluational Document Intended for Low-Literate Participant Journal of

Multy Desciplinary Evaluation. Vol. 6. Number 1 ISSN 1556-8180.

http://www.jmde.com/, retrieved on April 2nd, 2016.

Lodico, G. Marguerite, Dean T. Spaulding and Katherine H. Voegtle. 2006. Methods

in Educational Research: From Theory and Practice. San Fransisco: Jossey-

Bass.

Lado. M.J. 2008. Memahami Tenses Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: Titik Terang.

Messer, J David. 2003. Mastery Motivation in Early Childhood. London: Routledge.

Murkanto. 2006. English on the Sky for Junior High School StudentS. Jakarta:

Erlangga.

Norusis, Marija. 2007. SPSS Base 16.0 User’s Guided. Chicago: Prentice Hall.

Page 90: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Pardiyono. 2010. Teaching Genre-Based-Writing. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi.

PW, M Mursyid. 2005. English Learning Handout. p. 4,

http://www.mmursyidpw.files.wordpress.com, retrieved on April 2nd, 2016.

Schmitdt, Jack C. Richard. 1992. Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. New

York: Longman.

Scott, David and Marlene Morrison. 2006. Key in Educational Research. New York:

Continum.

Setiyadi, Ag Bambang. 2006. Metode Penelitian untuk Bahasa Asing Pendekatan

Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

____________________. 2006. Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Yogyakarta:

Graha Ilmu.

Siahaan, Juanita. 2013. An Analysis of Students’ Ability in Difficulties in Writing

Descriptive Text Journal English and Education. Vol. 1 Issue.

http://www.ejournal.upi.edu, retrieved on April 2nd, 2016.

Siahaan, Sanggam. 2007. Issues in Linguistics (1st Edition). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

______________. 2008. Generic Text Structure (1st Edition). Yogyakarta: Graha

Ilmu.

______________. 2008. The English Paragraph (1st Edition). Yogyakarta: Graha

Ilmu.

Sugiono. 2009. Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Steven. Simple Present Tense.

http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/simplepresent.html. retrieved on April

2nd, 2016.

Tarmizi, 2009. The Correlation Between Present Tense Mastery and the Ability of

Translating Descriptive Text Amongst the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN

1 Seunuddon Banda Aceh. A Thesis.

Trask, R.I. 1999. Key Concept in Language and Linguistics. London: Routledge.

Tribble, Christopher. 1996. Language Teaching Writing. Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Page 91: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Werner, Patricia. 1990. Mosaic 1 a Content –Based Grammar. New York: Mcgraw-

Hill.

Willie, Terry. Simple Present Tense. http://grammar.about.com/od/rs/g/Simple-

Present-Tense.htm. retrieved on April 2nd, 2016.

Wishon, George E. and Julia, M Burks. 1980. Let’s Write English. North York: Van

Nostrand Reinhold Ltd.

Page 92: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 1

The Result of Interview for English Teacher

The following of interview with the English teacher (Melda Wati, S.Pd):

NO. PERTANYAAN JAWABAN

1. Sejak Tahun berapa Ibu mulai

mengajar di SMPN 1 Karya

Penggawa ini?

Saya mulai mengajar di sekolah ini

sejak tahun 2004.

2. Apakah Ibu sudah mengajarkan

simple present tense dan descriptive

text kepada siswa kelas VIII?

Sudah, saya mengajarkan materi

tersebut saat semester 1.

3. Bagaimana menurut Ibu tentang

kemampuan siswa kelas VIII dalam

mempelajari materi tersebut?

Kebanyakan dari siswa kelas VIII

belum memahami materi tersebut,

walaupun juga ada beberapa yang

paham tapi tetap lebih banyak yang

belum paham.

4. Apa saja kesulitan siswa kelas VIII

dalam mempelajari materi simple

present tense dan descriptive text?

Dalam materi simple present tense,

siswa banyak sekali mengalami

kesulitan dalam memahami subject

dan tobe yang digunakan dan

aturan-aturan dalam membuat

kalimat simple present tense. Juga

tidak banyak dari mereka yang

belum paham dengan rumus simple

present tense.

Sedangkan dalam menulis text

descriptive, siswa banyak

mengalami kesulitan dalam

menyusun kalimat dengan benar

berdasarkan aturan dalam penulisan.

5. Adakah tehnik unggulan Ibu dalam

mengajar siswa kelas VIII?

Saya tidak mempunyai teknik yang

diunggulkan. Hanya saja, saya

kadang-kadang menggunakan laptop

untuk mengajari siswa agar lebih

santai dan lebih mudah dipahami.

Karena jika saya hanya

menggunakan buku siswa pasti akan

merasa cepat bosan.

Page 93: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 2

The Result of Interview for English Student

The following of interview with the students:

NO. NAMA PERTANYAAN JAWABAN

1. Students 1 1. Apakah kalian

menyukai pelajaran

bahasa inggris?

2. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

simple present tense?

3. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

simple present tense?

4. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika belajar simple

present tense?

5. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

descriptive text?

6. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

descriptive text?

7. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika menulis

descriptive text?

1. Tidak, bahasa inggris

sangat sulit

dimengerti.

2. Sudah.

3. Sangat sulit

dimengerti.

4. Menentukan subject

dan to be nya.

5. Sudah.

6. Sulit membuat text

nya kedalam bahasa

inggris.

7. Menyusun

kalimatnya dengan

benar.

2. Students 2 1. Apakah kalian

menyukai pelajaran

bahasa inggris?

2. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

simple present tense?

3. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

1. Saya suka, tapi susah

sekali pelajarannya.

2. Sudah.

3. Lumayan agak

mudah.

Page 94: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

simple present tense?

4. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika belajar simple

present tense?

5. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

descriptive text?

6. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

descriptive text?

7. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika menulis

descriptive text?

4. Ketika harus

menambahkan huruf

s dan es pada kata

kerjanya.

5. Sudah.

6. Sangat sulit

dipahami.

7. Mendeskripsikan

sesuatu.

3. Students 3 1. Apakah kalian

menyukai pelajaran

bahasa inggris?

2. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

simple present tense?

3. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

simple present tense?

4. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika belajar simple

present tense?

5. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

descriptive text?

6. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

descriptive text?

7. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika menulis

descriptive text?

1. Tidak, bahasa inggris

sulit dimengerti.

2. Sudah.

3. Kalimat untuk

menyatakan

pekerjaan sehari-

hari.

4. Menentukan to be

ketika subjectnya

diganti.

5. Sudah.

6. Menulis sebuah text.

7. Menyusun kata

katanya menjadi

sebuah text.

4. Students 4 1. Apakah kalian

menyukai pelajaran

bahasa inggris?

1. Ya, saya suka

pelajaran bahasa

inggris.

Page 95: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

2. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

simple present tense?

3. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

simple present tense?

4. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika belajar simple

present tense?

5. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

descriptive text?

6. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

descriptive text?

7. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika menulis

descriptive text?

2. Sudah.

3. Belajar simple

present tense berarti

belajar berbicara

bahasa inggris

sehari-hari.

4. Memahami rumus

nya.

5. Sudah.

6. Sebuah text

berbentuk

descriptive.

7. Mematuhi aturan-

aturan dalam

descriptive text.

5. Students 5 1. Apakah kalian

menyukai pelajaran

bahasa inggris?

2. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

simple present tense?

3. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

simple present tense?

4. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika belajar simple

present tense?

5. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

descriptive text?

6. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

descriptive text?

7. Kesulitan apa sajakah

1. Tidak, bahasa inggris

pelajaran yang sulit.

2. Sudah.

3. Kalimat yang

menggunakan verb 1.

4. Menentukan kata

kerja ketika subject

she.

5. Sudah.

6. Menggambarkan

seseorang.

7. Menentukan topic

Page 96: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

yang kalian hadapi

ketika menulis

descriptive text?

pada sebuah text.

6. Students 6 1. Apakah kalian

menyukai pelajaran

bahasa inggris?

2. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

simple present tense?

3. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

simple present tense?

4. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika belajar simple

present tense?

5. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

descriptive text?

6. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

descriptive text?

7. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika menulis

descriptive text?

1. Saya suka bahasa

inggris, walaupun

terkadang sulit.

2. Sudah.

3. Kalimat yang

menyatakan kegiatan

rutin kita.

4. Aturan penambahan

akhiran s dan es pada

kata kerja.

5. Sudah.

6. Menggambarkan

sesuatu.

7. Menentukan objek

dan topic nya.

7. Students 7 1. Apakah kalian

menyukai pelajaran

bahasa inggris?

2. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

simple present tense?

3. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

simple present tense?

4. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika belajar simple

present tense?

5. Apakah kalian sudah

mempelajari tentang

descriptive text?

1. Saya suka, karena

bahasa inggris adalah

bahasa internasional.

2. Sudah.

3. Sulit.

4. Membedakan verbal

dan nominal.

5. Sudah.

Page 97: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

6. Bagaimana menurut

kalian tentang materi

descriptive text?

7. Kesulitan apa sajakah

yang kalian hadapi

ketika menulis

descriptive text?

6. Sulit.

7. Membuat text yang

baik dan benar

berdasarkan aturan

dalam penulisan.

Page 98: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 3

SILABUS PEMBELAJARAN

Sekolah : SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat

Kelas : VIII ( Delapan )

Mata Pelajaran : BAHASA INGGRIS

Semester : 1 (Satu)

Standar Kompetensi : Mendengarkan

1. Memahami makna dalam percakapan transaksional dan interpersonal sederhana untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan

sekitar.

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

1.1 Merespon makna

yang terdapat

dalam percakapan

transaksional (to

get things done)

dan interpersonal

(bersosialisasi)

sederhana secara

akurat, lancar, dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi

dengan lingkungan

sekitar yang

Percakapan

singkatan memuat

ungkapan –

ungkapan:

A : Is the sunset

from the east?

B : No it isn’t..

A: Are you a

teacher?

B: yes, i/m..

1. Brainstorming

bertanya dan

menjawab

tentang

berbagai hal

terkait tema

topik yang

akan

dibicarakan.

2. Membahas

kosakata (

noun phrase,

verb phrase,

m

Merespon

ungkapan meminta,

memberi, menolak

jasa

Merespon

ungkapan meminta,

memberi, menolak

barang

Mengakui,

mengingkari fakta

Tes

lisan

Tes

lisan

Tes

lisan

Merespon

secara lisan

Pertanyaan

lisan

Pilihan

ganda

Respond the

following

statement

Q: Let me help

you

A:.......

Q: Can I have a

bit?

A: ...........

Choose the right

response

8x 40

menit

1. Script

percakap -

an

2. Rekaman

Percakapan:

- Cassette

- Tape

Recorder

- CD

- CD Player

- TV

3. Gambar-

Page 99: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

melibatkan tindak

tutur: meminta,

memberi, menolak

jasa, meminta,

memberi, menolak

barang, mengakui,

mengingkari fakta,

dan meminta dan

memberi pendapat

1.2 Merespon makna

yang terdapat

dalam percakapan

transaksional (to

get things done)

dan interpersonal

(bersosialisasi)

sederhana secara

akurat, lancar, dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi

dengan lingkungan

A: Did you break

the glass?

B: Yes I did / No, it

wasn’t me.

A: What do you

think of this?

B: Not bad.

Percakapan

singkatan memuat

ungkapan –

ungkapan:

A: Would you come

to my party?

B: I’d love to / I

adverb

phrase) tata

bahasa

(kalimat

sederhana

tentang

tawaran jasa,

meminta

sesuatu,

informasi

faktual,

pendapat

terkait materi

percakapan .

3. Mendengarkan

percakapan

yang memuat

ungkapan-

ungkapan

dalam materi.

4. Menjawab

pertanyaan

tentang isi

percakapan.

5. Memberi

respon lisan

dan tulis

terhadap

ungkapan

yang didengar.

Merespon

ungkapan meminta

dan memberi

pendapat

Merespon

ungkapan

mengundang,mener

ima, dan menolak

ajakan

Merespon

ungkapan

menyetujui / tidak

menyetujui

Tes

lisan

Tes

lisan

Pertanyaan

lisan

Isian

Q: Did you

break the glass?

a. Yes, I did

b. I don’t know

c. I’m not sure

d. All right

Q: What do you

think of my new

dress

A:............

Write your

response to the

following

statements:

1.Would you go

with me to the

movie?

2.I do agree

with you to

join the speech

contest

3.You have

beautiful hair.

4.You passed

your exams.

Congratulatio

ns.

8 x 40

menit

gambar/

benda

terkait

1 Script

percakapan

2 Rekaman

percakapan

3 Tape

recorder

4 Gambar

yang

relevan

5 Buku teks

yang

relevan

Page 100: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

sekitar yang

melibatkan tindak

tutur:

mengundang,

menerima dan

menolak ajakan,

menyetujui/tidak

menyetujui,

memuji, dan

memberi selamat

want to, but ........

A; I do agree

B; Thanks for the

support.

A; No way ....

B: It’s O.K. No

problem

A: You have

beautiful hair.

B: Thank you.

A: Happy birthday.

B: Thank you.

1. Memberi

respons lisan

Curah

pendapat

tentang hal-hal

terkait

topik/ungkapa

n yang akan

dibahas

2. Membahas

kosakata dan

tata bahasa

terkait topik /

ungkapan

yang dibahas

3. Mendengarkan

percakapan

memuat

ungkapan

terkait marteri

4. Tanya jawab

tentang isi

percakapan

5. Tanya jawab

tentang fungsi

dan makna

ungkapan

Merespon

ungkapan memuji

Merespon

ungkapan memberi

selamat

Page 101: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

dalam

percakapan

Standar Kompetensi : Mendengarkan

2. Memahami makna dalam teks lisan fungsional dan monolog pendek sederhana berbentuk descriptive dan recount untuk berinteraksi dengan

lingkungan sekitar.

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

1.3 Merespon makna

yang terdapat

dalam teks lisan

fungsional pendek

sederhana secara

akurat, lancar, dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi dengan

lingkungan sekitar.

Teks fungsioanl

pendek berupa :

Undangan

Contoh:

Dear Rio,

I want you to come

to my house for

lunch on Sunday at

12 a.m.

Thanks.

Mona

Ciri kebahasaan

teks fungsional

1. Tanya jawab

tentang berbagai

hal terkait

topik/tema yang

akan dibahas

2. Membahas

kosakata yang

terkait

tema/topik/undan

gan (noun

phrase, verb

phrase)

3. membahas

ungkapan-

ungkapan yang

Mengidentifikasi

informasi yang

terdapat dalam

teks fungsional

pendek berupa

undangan.

Mengidentifikasi

ciri kebahasaan

dalam teks

fungsional

pendek berupa

Undangan.

Tes

tertulis

Melengkapi

rumpang

Complete the

following

sentences

based on the

text you hear

8 x 40

menit

1. Script teks

undangan

2. Rekaman

undangan

- cassette

- tape

recorder

- CD

- CD

Player

- TV

3. Gambar/

realia terkait

tema/topik/

jenis teks

Page 102: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

1.4 Merespon makna

yang terdapat

dalam monolog

pendek sederhana

secara akurat,

lancar, dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi dengan

lingkungan sekitar

dalam teks

berbentuk

pendek

Langkah retorika

teks:

- descriptive (identification

– descriptions)

- recount (

orientation

events)

- reorientation

Teks lisan

berbentuk

descriptive

sering muncul

dalam undangan:

- I want you to

come

to.......

- Please come

to .....

- Don’t forget

to come

to......

4. Mendengarkan

teks fungsional

pendek

(undangan)

5. menjawab

pertanyaan

tentang berbagai

informasi yang

terdapat dalam

teks fungsional,

undangan.

6. Mendengarkan

contoh-contoh

undangan lainnya

dari teman.

7. Mengidentifikasi

ciri kebahasaan

teks fungsional

pendek :

undangan

Mengidentifikasi

Informasi/makna

yang terdapat

dalam teks

berbentuk

descriptive dan

Tes lisan

Pertanyaan

lisan

Answer the

questions

orally based

on the text you

listen to

8 x 40

menit

1 Buku teks

yang relevan

2 Gambar

Page 103: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

descriptive dan

recount

recount

Langkah retorika

teks :

descriptive

(identification –

descriptions)

recount (

orientation

events –

reorientation)

- invitee

- occasion

- time

- place

- Invitor

1 Eliciting kosakata

terkait tema/topik/

jenis teks

2 Membahas tata

bahasa terkait

jenis teks yang

akan dibahas

3 Mendengarkan

teks monolog

descriptive /

recount dengan

topik tertentu

4 Menjawab

pertanyaan

tentang berbagai

informasi terkait

teks yang

didengar

5 Menjawab

pertanyaan

tentang tujuan

komunikatif teks

yang didengar

recount

Mengidentifikasi

fungsional dan

langkah retorika

teks deskriptif

dan recount.

Tes tulis

PG

Choose the

best option

based on the

text you have

listened to

terkait tema

/ topik

3 Script teks:

descriptive /

recount

4 Rekaman

teks

5 Tape

recorder

6 OHP

7 Lingkungan

sekitar

Page 104: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Standar Kompetensi : Berbicara

3. Mengungkap kan makna dalam percakapan transaksional dan interpersonal lisan pendek sederhana untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan sekitar

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran Kegiatan Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

Mengungkapkan

makna dalam

percakapan

transaksional (to

get things done)

dan interpersonal

(bersosialisasi)

sederhana dengan

menggunakan

ragam bahasa lisan

secara akurat,

lancar, dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi dengan

lingkungan sekitar

yang melibatkan

tindak tutur:

meminta, memberi,

menolak jasa,

meminta, memberi,

menolak barang,

mengakui,

Percakapan

singkatan memuat

ungkapan –

ungkapan.

A; Let me help you.

B: Thank you so

much.

A: Can I have a bit.

B: Sure. Here you

are.

A: Did you break

the glass?

B: Yes, I did /

No, it wasn’t me.

A: What do you

think of this?

B: Not bad.

1. Review kosakata

dan ungkapan-

ungkapan terkait

materi dan tema

2. Tanya jawab

menggunakan

ungkapan-

ungkapan tersebut

3. Bermain peran

melakukan

percakapan yang

disediakan guru

4. Bermain peran

melakukan

percakapan

berdasarkan

situasi /gambar

yang disediakan

5. Menggunakan

ungkapan yang

telah dipelajari

dalam real life

Bertanya dan

menjawab

tentang

meminta,mem

beri, menolak

jasa

Bertanya dan

menjawab

tentang

meminta,mem

beri, menolak

barag

Bertanya dan

menjawab

tentang

mengakui,

mengingkari

fakta

Bertanya dan

memberi

pendapat

Tes lisan

Bermain

peran

Create a

dialogue

based on the

role cards and

perform it in

front of the

class.

8 x 40

menit

1. Buku teks

yang relevan

2. Gambar-

gambar

terkait tema

3. Realia

Benda sekitar

Page 105: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran Kegiatan Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

mengingkari fakta,

dan meminta dan

memberi pendapat

Memahami dan

merespon

percakapan

transaksional (to

get things done)

dan interpersonal

(bersosialisasi)

sederhana dengan

menggunakan

ragam bahasa lisan

secara akurat,

lancar, dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi dengan

lingkungan sekitar

yang melibatkan

tindak tutur:

mengundang,

menerima dan

menolak ajakan,

menyetujui/tidak

menyetujui,

memuji, dan

memberi selamat

A: Would you come

to

party?

B: I’d love to / I

wan’t to,

but .........

A: I do agree.

B: Thanks for the

Support.

A: No, way, ...

B: It’s O.K. I

understand.

A: You have

beautiful

hair.

B: Thank you.

A: Happy birthday.

B; Thank you.

situation

1. Review kosakata

terkait tema, topik

sebelumnya

2. Memperkenalkan

kosakata baru /

ungkapan-

ungkapan yang

akan dibahas

3. Tanya jawab

menggunakan

ungkapan-

ungkapan terkait

materi

4. Menirukan

percakapan yang

diucapkan guru

5. Melakukan

percakapan yang

diberikan

6. Melakukan tanya

jawab

menggunakan

ungkapan

Bertanya dan

menjawab

tentang

mengundang,

menerima,

menolak

ajakan

Bertanya dan

menjawab

tentang

menyetujui.tid

ak menyetujui

Bertanya dan

menjawab

tentang

memuji

Tes lisan

Bermain

peran

Create a

dialogue

based on the

role cards and

perform it in

front of the

class.

8 x 40

menit

Page 106: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran Kegiatan Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

Bertanya dan

menjawab

tentang

memberi

selamat

Standar Kompetensi : Berbicara

4. Mengungkap kan makna dalam teks lisan fungsional dan monolog pendek sederhana yang berbentuk descriptive dan recount untuk berinteraksi

dengan lingkungan sekitar

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

Page 107: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

4.1 .Mengungkapkan

makna dalam

bentuk teks lisan

fungsional pendek

sederhana dengan

menggunakan

ragam bahasa lisan

secara akurat,

lancar, dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi

dengan lingkungan

sekitar

Teks fungsional

pendek berupa

:Undangan

1. Mendengarkan

teks fungsional

pendek:

undangan

2. Tanya jawab

tentang isi teks

“undangan”

3. Tanya jawab

tentang struktur

teks

4. Membuat kalimat

sederhana terkait

jenis teks bentuk

undangan

- I want to come

to....

- Please come to

........

5. Berlatih

mengundang

seseorang secara

lisan

menggunakan

gambit-gambit

tertentu

Contoh:

A: Hi Guys, I

want you all

to come

Mengungkapan

secara lisan

teks fungsional

pendek

berbentuk

undangan.

Contoh:

Dear Rio,

I want you to

come to my

house for lunch

on Sunday at

12 a.m.

Thanks.

Mona

Bertanya dan

menjawab

secara lisan

berbagai

informasi

tentangteks

fungsional

pendek

berbentuk

undangan

Tes lisan

Performance

Invite your

friend to

come to your

bithday party

orally!

8 x 40

menit

1. Buku teks

yang relevan

2. Gambar

terkait

tema/topik

3. Benda-benda

sekitar

Page 108: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

4.2. Mengungkapkan

makna dalam

monolog pendek

sederhana dengan

menggunakan

ragam bahasa nista

secara akurat,

lancar, dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi

dengan lingkungan

sekitar dalam teks

berbentuk

descriptive dan

recount

1.Teks pendek

berbentuk

recount

2. – informasi

faktual

- informasi rinci

- gagasan utama

- gagasan

pendukung

dalam teks

pendek

berbentuk

recount

to my

birthday

party.

B: We’d love to!

When?

A: Tomorrow, at

4.00

6. Secara

berpasangan atau

dalam kelompok

mengungkapkan

undangan

berdasarkan

konteks/situasi

yang diberikan

7. Secara mandiri

mengungkapkan

undangan lisan

1. Bertanya dan

menjawab

berbagai

infmasi secara

lisan dalam

teks pendek

Tes lisan

Tes lisan

Performance

Think of an

activity or

event that

happened to

you yesterday

and tell us

about it.

9 x 40

menit

1. Buku teks

yang relevan

2. Koran/majalah

3. Gambar

peristiwa

Page 109: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

3. Ciri kebahasaan

teks

recount

1. Tanya jawab

berbagai hal

terkait topik

tertentu (

peristiwa,

kejadian,

pengalaman )

2. Mengembangkan

kosakata, tata

bahasa terkait

topik / jenis teks

recount

3. Mengidentifikasi

kejadin,

peristiwa,

pengalaman yang

pernah dialami

melalui tanya

jawab

4. Melakukan

monolog dalam

bentuk recount

berbentuk :

- Recount

2. Melakukan

monolog

pendek dalam

bentuk

recount

Page 110: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Standar Kompetensi : Membaca

5. Memahami makna teks tulis fungsional dan esei pendek sederhana berbentuk descriptive dan recount yang berkaitan dengan lingkungan sekitar

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

Membaca nyaring

bermakna teks

tulis fungsional

dan esei

berbentuk

descriptive dan

recount pendek

dan sederhana

dengan ucapan,

tekanan dan

intonasi yang

berterima yang

berkaitan

dengan

lingkungan

sekitar

Merespon makna

dalam teks tulis

fungsional

pendek

sederhana

secara akurat

lancar dan

berterima yang

berkaitan

Teks fungsional

pendek berupa:

Undangan

1. Brain storming

tentang

berbagai hal

terkait teks

fungsional

pendek

berbentuk

“undangan”

2. Mendengarkan

undangan yang

dibacakan oleh

guru/teman

3. membaca

nyaring teks

fungsioanl

pendek tentang

undangan

4. menjawab

pertanyaan

tentang isi teks

fungsional

pendek

“undangan”

5. Menyebutkan

tujuan

Membaca

dengan nyaring

dan bermakna

teks fungsional

pendek

berbentuk

undangan

Mengidentifikasi

berbagai

informasi dalam

teks fungsional

pendek

berbentuk

undangan

Mengidentifikasi

fungsi sosial

teks fungsional

pendek

berbentuk

undangan

Mengidentifikasi

ciri kebahasaan

teks fungsional

pendek

berbentuk

Tes

lisan

Tes

tertulis

Membaca

nyaring

Uraian

PG

Read the the

text aloud

and clearly.

Answer the

following

questions

based on the

text

8 x 40

menit

8 x 40

menit

1. Buku teks yang

relevan

2. Gambar terkait

tema/topik

3. Benda-benda

sekitar

1. Buku teks yang

Page 111: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

dengan

lingungan

sekitar

Merespon

makna dan

langkah retorika

dalam esei

pendek

sederhana

secara akurat,

lancar dan

berterima yang

berkaitan

dengan

lingkungan

sekitar dalam

teks berbentuk

descriptive dan

recount

Makna gagasan

Makna tekstual

dalam teks

descriptive dan

recount

Langkah retorika

teks descriptive

dan recount

Tujuan

komunikatif teks

descriptive dan

recount

Ciri kebahasaan

teks descriptive

dan recount

komunikatif

teks fungsional

pendek

“undangan”

6. Menjwab

pertanyaan

tentang ciri

kebahasaan

teks fungsional

pendek

“undangan”

1. Tanya jawab

berbagai hal

terkait

tema/topik

bacaan

2. Review

kosakata dan

tatabahasa

terkait jenis

teks

descriptive/reco

unt

3. Membaca teks

descriptive/reco

unt

4. Menjawab

pertanyaan

tentang

undangan

Makna gagasan

Makna tekstual

dalam teks

descriptive dan

recount

Langkah

retorika teks

descriptive dan

recount

Tujuan

komunikatif teks

descriptive dan

recount

Ciri kebahasaan

teks descriptive

dan recount

Tes tulis

Tes

lisan

Membaca

nyaring

Choose the

best option

based on the

text.

Read the text

aloud.

8 x 40

menit

relevan

2. Koran/majalah

3. Gambar

peristiwa/tempat

4. Lingkungan

sekitar

Page 112: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

informasi yang

terdapat dalam

teks

5. Menjawab

pertanyaan

tentang tujuan

komunikatif

tdan langkah

retorika teks

descriptive/rec

ount

6. Menyebutkan

ciri-ciri

kebahasaan

teks yang

dibaca

7. Membaca

nyaring dan

bermakna teks

descriptive/rec

ount

Standar Kompetensi : Menulis

6. Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks tulis fungsional dan esei pendek sederhana berbentuk descriptive, dan recount untuk berinteraksi dengan

lingkungan sekitar

Materi Kegiatan Indikator Penilaian Alokasi Sumber

Page 113: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Pokok/Pembelajaran Pembelajaran Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

Waktu Belajar

6.1. Mengungkapkan

makna dalam

bentuk teks tulis

fungsional pendek

sederhana dengan

menggunakan

ragam bahasa tulis

secara akurat,

lancar dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi

dengan lingkungan

sekitar

6.2. Mengungkapkan

makna dan langkah

retorika dalam esei

pendek sederhana

dengan

menggunakan

ragam bahasa tulis

secara akurat,

lancar dan

berterima untuk

berinteraksi

dengan lingkungan

Teks fungsional

pendek

berupa :

- Undangan

- Pengumuman

- Pesan Singkat

Teks rumpang

berbentuk

- descriptive

- recount

Kalimat acak

1. Tanya jawab

berbagai hal

terkait

tema/topik

teks

fungsional

yang akan

dibahas

2. Penguatan

kembali

kosakata dan

tata bahasa

terkait jenis

teks

fungsional

3. Menulis

kalimat

sederhana

terkait jenis

teks

4. Menulis teks

fungsional

pendek

berdasarkan

konteks

1. Review

ungkapan-

Melengkapi

rumpang teks

fungsional

pendek

Meyusun kata

menjadi teks

fungsional

yang

bermakna

Menulis teks

fungsional

pendek

Melengkapi

rumpang teks

essai pendek

berbentuk

descriptive

Menyusun

kalimat

Tes tulis

Tes tulis

Tes tulis

Tes tulis

Essay

Completion

Jumbled

sentences

Essay

1.Write simple

sentences

based on the

situation

given.

2.Write an

invitation/ an

announceme

nt / message

based on the

situation

given.

Complete the

paragraph

using the

suitable

words.

Rearrange

the following

sentences

correctly.

8 x 40

menit

8 x 40

menit

1.Buku teks

yang

relevanConto

h undangan,

pengumuman

, SMS

2.Gambar yang

relevan

1. Buku teks

yang relevan

2. Gambar

terkait

tema/topik

3. Benda-benda

sekitar

Page 114: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

sekitar dalam teks

berbentuk

descriptive dan

recount

ungkapan

yang

mendeskripsi

kan benda,

orang atau

tempat.

2. Menulis

kalimat yang

mendeskripsi

kan benda,

tempat, orang

atau binatang

berdasarkan

gambar/realia

.

3. Melengkapi

rumpang

dalam teks

deskriptif

dengan kata

yang tepat.

4. Menyusun

kalimat acak

menjadi teks

deskriptif

yang terpadu.

5. Membuat

draft teks

deskriptive

secara

menjadi teks

yang

bermakna

dalam bentuk

descriptive

Menulis teks

essai dalam

bentuk

descriptive .

Write an

essay

describing

something or

a certain

place.

Page 115: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Kompetensi

Dasar

Materi

Pokok/Pembelajaran

Kegiatan

Pembelajaran Indikator

Penilaian Alokasi

Waktu

Sumber

Belajar Teknik Bentuk

Instrumen

Contoh

Instrumen

mandiri.

6. Mengekspos

teks

descriptive

yang ditulis

di kelas.

Page 116: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 4

Try out Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

Choose the best answer by crossing a, b, c and d.

1. She … good girl.

a. is having

b. has

c. was having

d. is

2. I ... Indonesian.

a. am

b. is

c. are

d. was

3. An architect ... a person who plans a new building.

a. is

b. are

c. were

d. was

4. I have a friend. He is Jonathan from Jakarta. He ... an actor.

a. is

b. was

c. were

d. are

5. Andi: Hello Rina, are you in your uncle’s house?

Rina: I ... in my uncle’s house.

a. is not

b. was not

c. am not

d. are not

Page 117: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

6. He ... a police.

a. aren’t

b. am

c. isn’t

d. weren’t

7. I ... not a teacher.

a. am

b. is

c. are

d. were

8. She ... happy.

a. isn’t

b. aren’t

c. weren’t

d. wasn’t

9. ... Mrs. Dewi an Arabic teacher?

a. Are

b. Do

c. Is

d. Does

10. ... Anton a student?

a. Are

b. Is

c. Were

d. Was

11. Where ... you from?

a. is

b. do

c. does

d. are

12. ... she a police woman?

a. Are

b. Is

c. Do

d. Did

Page 118: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

13. ... your father a smokes?

a. Aren’t

b. Isn’t

c. Weren’t

d. Didn’t

14. ... she a farmer?

a. Isn’t

b. Iam

c. Was

d. Don’t

15. The earth ... around the sun.

a. move

b. moved

c. moves

d. was moving

16. ... you a good boy ?

a. Aren’t

b. Isn’t

c. Wasn’t

d. Don’t

17. My friend and I ... English at English course everyday.

a. learn

b. learning

c. learns

d. learned

18. Susanty ... mathematics every night.

a. study

b. studies

c. studing

d. studied

Page 119: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

19. She ... cooking.

a. don’t like

b. doesn’t likes

c. don’t liked

d. doesn’t like

20. The old man ... in the farm every morning.

a. work

b. working

c. works

d. worked

21. Every year Michael doesn’t ... a medal from Olympiad in Greece.

a. gotten

b. got

c. gonna

d. get

22. She ... not go to school every day.

a. does

b. go

c. do

d. did

23. Does Anita ... to campus?

a. goes

b. go

c. gone

d. went

24. She doesn’t ... every Sunday.

a. work

b. works

c. worked

d. working

25. Does she ... every night?

a. study

b. studies

c. studying

d. is study

Page 120: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

26. ... you work everyday?

a. Do

b. Done

c. Does

d. Did

27. ... you watch movie every 7 pm?

a. Don’t

b. Doesn’t

c. Didn’t

d. Does

28. ... Mr. Ahmad go to office every friday?

a. Doesn’t

b. Don’t

c. Isn’t

d. Aren’t

29. ... they play football?

a. Doesn’t

b. Don’t

c. Isn’t

d. Aren’t

30. ... your mom ... every morning.

a. Doesn’t, cooks

b. Doesn’t, cook

c. Doesn’t, cooked

d. Doesn’t, cooking

31. … Andri and Shena like to drink cocacola?

a. Do

b. Don’t

c. Does

d. Doesn’t

32. Does she breakfast ...?

a. every

b. morning

c. every morning

Page 121: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

d. tonight

33. … 1945 Indonesia freedom.

a. Ago

b. Last

c. In the

d. Finally

34. Does she go to school ...?

a. study

b. everyday

c. last night

d. year

35. Do you go to the doctor ...?

a. every

b. month

c. hospital

d. every month

36. She always come …

a. in the

b. late

c. yesterday

d. ago

37. My uncle give me some books … week.

a. yesterday

b. late

c. last

d. in the

38. Budi ... comes on time, so he is never late.

a. never

b. always

c. often

d. now

39. Indonesia … its independence day in August.

a. always celebrate

b. be

c. never

Page 122: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

d. feel

40. The workers … late for work.

a. came

b. never be

c. be

d. never

41. Do you go to cafe with family ...?

a. at saturday night

b. every saturday night

c. saturday night

d. in saturday night

42. how … you exercise? At last one week.

a. often

b. do

c. often do

d. do often

43. Rafista … coffe in the morning.

a. never

b. drink

c. drunk

d. never drink

44. He ... reads some books everyday.

a. usually

b. do

c. chemistry

d. language

45. We ... walks to school.

a. always

b. ways

c. open

d. often

46. she never … ready when I pick her up.

a. be

Page 123: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

b. never be

c. never

d. be always

47. I ... go to Bali, so I don’t know about Kuta beach.

a. often

b. never

c. sometimes

d. seldom

48. She ….. studies hard and gets the best score.

a. always

b. all

c. do

d. done

49. She does not go to the party ...

a. every month

b. every

c. month

d. back

50. Do they … study Arabic?

a. seldom

b. be

c. be seldom

d. not now

Page 124: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Answer key for Try Out Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

1. D 11. D 21.D 31. B 41. B

2. C 12. B 22. A 32. A 42. C

3. A 13. B 23. B 33. C 43. D

4. A 14. A 24. A 34. C 44. B

5. C 15. C 25. A 35. D 45. B

6. C 16. A 26. A 36. B 46. A

7. A 17. A 27. A 37. C 47. A

8. A 18. B 28. A 38. B 48. B

9. C 19. D 29. B 39. A 49. A

10. B 20. C 30. B 40. B 50. A

Page 125: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 5

Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

Choose the best answer by crossing a, b, c and d.

1. She … good girl.

a. is having

b. has

c. was having

d. is

2. I ... Indonesian.

a. am

b. is

c. are

d. was

3. An architect ... a person who plans a new building.

a. is

b. are

c. were

d. was

4. I have a friend. He is Jonathan from Jakarta. He ... an actor.

a. is

b. was

c. were

d. are

5. Andi: Hello Rina, are you in your uncle’s house?

Rina: I ... in my uncle’s house.

a. is not

b. was not

c. am not

d. are not

Page 126: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

6. He ... a police.

a. aren’t

b. am

c. isn’t

d. weren’t

7. I ... not a teacher.

a. am

b. is

c. are

d. were

8. She ... happy.

a. isn’t

b. aren’t

c. weren’t

d. wasn’t

9. ... Mrs. Dewi an Arabic teacher?

a. Are

b. Do

c. Is

d. Does

10. ... Anton a student?

a. Are

b. Is

c. Were

d. Was

11. Where ... you from?

a. is

b. do

c. does

d. are

12. ... she a police woman?

a. Are

b. Is

c. Do

d. Did

Page 127: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

13. ... your father a smokes?

a. Aren’t

b. Isn’t

c. Weren’t

d. Didn’t

14. ... she a farmer?

a. Isn’t

b. Iam

c. Was

d. Don’t

15. The earth ... around the sun.

a. move

b. moved

c. moves

d. was moving

16. ... you a good boy ?

a. Aren’t

b. Isn’t

c. Wasn’t

d. Don’t

17. My friend and I ... English at English course everyday.

a. learn

b. learning

c. learns

d. learned

18. Susanty ... mathematics every night.

a. study

b. studies

c. studing

d. studied

Page 128: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

19. She ... cooking.

a. don’t like

b. doesn’t likes

c. don’t liked

d. doesn’t like

20. The old man ... in the farm every morning.

a. work

b. working

c. works

d. worked

21. Every year Michael doesn’t ... a medal from Olympiad in Greece.

a. gotten

b. got

c. gonna

d. get

22. She ... not go to school every day.

a. does

b. go

c. do

d. did

23. Does Anita ... to campus?

a. goes

b. go

c. gone

d. went

24. She doesn’t ... every Sunday.

a. work

b. works

c. worked

d. working

25. ... you work everyday?

a. Do

b. Done

c. Does

d. Did

26. ... you watch movie every 7 pm?

Page 129: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

a. Don’t

b. Doesn’t

c. Didn’t

d. Does

27. ... they play football?

a. Doesn’t

b. Don’t

c. Isn’t

d. Aren’t

28. ... your mom ... every morning.

a. Doesn’t, cooks

b. Doesn’t, cook

c. Doesn’t, cooked

d. Doesn’t, cooking

29. … Andri and Shena like to drink cocacola?

a. Do

b. Don’t

c. Does

d. Doesn’t

30. Does she breakfast ...?

a. every

b. morning

c. every morning

d. tonight

31. Does she go to school ...?

a. study

b. everyday

c. last night

d. year

32. Do you go to the doctor ...?

a. every

b. month

c. hospital

d. every month

Page 130: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

33. Budi ... comes on time, so he is never late.

a. never

b. always

c. often

d. now

34. Do you go to cafe with family ...?

a. at saturday night

b. every saturday night

c. saturday night

d. in saturday night

35. He ... reads some books everyday.

a. usually

b. do

c. chemistry

d. language

36. We ... walks to school.

a. always

b. ways

c. open

d. often

37. I ... go to Bali, so I don’t know about Kuta beach.

a. often

b. never

c. sometimes

d. seldom

38. She ….. studies hard and gets the best score.

a. always

b. all

c. do

d. done

39. She does not go to the party ...

a. every month

b. every

c. month

d. back

Page 131: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

40. do they … study Arabic?

a. seldom

b. be

c. be seldom

d. not now

Page 132: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

Answer Key for Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

1. D 11. D 21.D 31. C

2. C 12. B 22. A 32. D

3. A 13. B 23. B 33. B

4. A 14. A 24. A 34. B

5. C 15. C 25. A 35. B

6. C 16. A 26. A 36. B

7. A 17. A 27. B 37. A

8. A 18. B 28. B 38. B

9. C 19. D 29. B 39. A

10. B 20. C 30. A 40. A

Page 133: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

105

APPENDIX 6

Writing Descriptive Text Test

Name :

Class :

Subject : English

Sub Matter : Writing

Alocation : 40 Minutes

Instruction:

1. Write your name and your class clearly on the paper

2. Use your time adequately

3. Work individually

Direction:

1. Chose one of the topic below:

Person

Place

Think

2. Write a descriptive text correctly based on the topic chosen.

Page 134: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 7

Scoring of Writing by Tribble

Areas Scores Descriptor

Content 30-27 Excellent to very good: knowledgeable - substantive.

26-22 Good to average: some knowledge of subject - little

substance.

21-17 Fair to poor: limited knowledge of subject - no stated.

16-13 Very poor: does not show knowledge of subject - non

substantive.

Organization 20-18 Excellent to very good: fluent expression – ideas clearly

stated.

13-10 Fair to good: non-fluent - ideas confused of disconnected.

9-7 Very poor: does not communicate - no organization.

Vocabulary 20-18 Excellent to very good: sophisticated range - effective

word/idiom choice and usage.

17-14 Good to average: adequate - occasional errors of

word/idiom form, choice, usage but meaning not

obscured.

13-10 Fair to poor: major problem in simple/complex

construction.

9-7 Very poor: essentially translation - little knowledge of

English vocabulary.

Language use 25-22 Excellent to very good: effective complex construction.

21-19 Good to average: effective but simple construction.

17-11 Fair poor: major problems in simple/complex

construction rules.

10-5 Very poor: virtually no mastery of sentence construction

rules.

Mechanics 5 Excellent to very good: demonstrates mastery of

conventions.

4 Good to average: occasional errors in spelling,

punctuation.

3 Fair to poor: frequent errors in spelling, punctuation,

capitalization.

2 Very poor: non mastery of convention-dominated by

errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization,

paragraphing.

Source: Christoper Tribble, Language Teaching Writing.

Page 135: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 8

The Result of Validation Form Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

Direction:

For each question, please give your response by ticking () a box representing your

choice: No. Question Yes No Comment

1. Apakah indicator-indikator sudah mencakup aspek yang

akan diukur?

2. Apakah alokasi waktu sudah cukup?

3. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan aspek simple

present tense dalam kalimat nominal bentuk positive?

4. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan aspek simple

present tense dalam kalimat nominal bentuk negative?

5. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan aspek simple

present tense dalam kalimat nominal bentuk

interrogative?

6. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan aspek simple

present tense dalam kalimat nominal bentuk negative

interrogative?

7. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan aspek simple

present tense dalam kalimat verbal bentuk positive?

8. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan aspek simple

present tense dalam kalimat verbal bentuk negative?

9. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan simple present

tense dalam kalimat verbal bentuk interrogative?

10. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan simple present

tense dalam kalimat verbal bentuk negative

interrogative?

11. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan simple present

tense dalam kalimat time signal adverb of time?

12. Apakah soal nomor sudah sesuai dengan simple present

tense dalam kalimat time signal adverb of frequency?

Date, September 30th, 2016

Validator

Melda wati, S.Pd

NIP. 19791230 200604 2 006

Page 136: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 9

Validation Form for Writing Descriptive Text

Direction:

For each question, please give your response by ticking () a box representing your

choice:

No. Question Yes No Comment

1. Apakah indikator-indikator sudah mencakup

aspek yang ingin diukur?

2. Apakah petunjuk pengerjaan sudah jelas?

3. Apakah alokasi waktu sudah cukup?

4. Apakah describe particular person, place or

thing sudah sesuai dengan silabus kelas

delapan?

Date, September 30th, 2016

Validator

Melda wati, S.Pd

NIP. 19791230 200604 2 006

Page 137: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

No. Name R1 R2 D = R1 – R2 D2

1 ALDI ARDIANSYAH 74 70 4 16 2 AMANDA SAPUTRA 74 70 4 16 3 CHICA MEILINDA 69 71 -2 4 4 DEDI SABARI 76 64 12 144 5 DELIMA NURMUSIAH 76 74 2 4 6 DEWI SARTIKA 69 67 2 4 7 JULIO FATONI 66 74 -8 64 8 LETI SUSANTI 72 72 0 0 9 MAYA PATWA RENI 68 62 6 36

10 MEDI YANTO 73 71 2 4 11 MELDA SAFITRI 76 72 4 16 12 NANI ANJAINI 70 66 4 16 13 NOVA YANTI 78 72 6 36 14 RAFKI IDRUS 70 74 -4 16 15 RETNO SANDINI 77 73 4 16 16 RIA ADDHA 72 68 4 16 17 RIFIL YANTO 67 69 -2 4 18 RISA 71 69 2 4 19 ROSA LESMANA 73 77 -4 16 20 SAHRI YANTO 74 70 4 16 21 SINTA DIAH SARI 67 73 -6 36 22 SUHARDI 75 73 2 4 23 TRI PUSPITASARI 68 72 -4 16 24 TYA RINGGON FITRIANI 66 64 2 4 25 UTAMI CANTIKA 71 73 -2 4 26 VETA LOCA 69 67 2 4 27 YESTI KURNIA 72 68 4 16 28 YONA AFRILIA 71 69 2 4 29 YUSRIZAL 74 70 4 16 30 ZANA PURI 76 74 2 4

Total 556

𝜌 = 1 − 6 ∑ 2D

𝑁(𝑁2 − 1)

= 1 − 6(556)

30(302− 1)

= 1 − 3336

30(899)

= 1 − 3336

26970

= 1 − 0,1236929922

= 0.8763070078 (very high reliability)

Page 138: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 10

RELIABILITY OF WRITING TEST

No. Name Content Organization Vocabulary Language Mechanics Total Score Average

Score R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2 R1 R2

1 ALDI ARDIANSYAH 18 16 17 16 17 16 18 19 4 3 74 70 72

2 AMANDA SAPUTRA 19 15 17 16 16 17 19 18 3 4 74 70 72

3 CHICA MEILINDA 17 18 15 16 14 12 20 20 3 5 69 71 70

4 DEDI SABARI 19 16 17 15 18 15 18 14 4 4 76 64 70

5 DELIMA NURMUSIAH 18 17 18 17 17 16 18 19 5 5 76 74 75

6 DEWI SARTIKA 15 15 15 14 14 17 20 17 5 4 69 67 68

7 JULIO FATONI 15 17 15 16 16 18 15 18 5 5 66 74 70

8 LETI SUSANTI 18 17 17 16 16 16 17 18 4 5 72 72 72

9 MAYA PATWA RENI 17 19 17 16 15 10 16 15 3 2 68 62 65

10 MEDI YANTO 17 20 15 16 18 15 19 18 4 2 73 71 72

11 MELDA SAFITRI 18 18 17 15 16 15 20 20 5 4 76 72 74

12 NANI ANJAINI 17 17 17 15 15 15 18 17 3 2 70 66 68

13 NOVA YANTI 19 20 17 14 17 15 20 19 5 4 78 72 75

14 RAFKI IDRUS 17 17 17 17 16 16 17 20 3 4 70 74 72

15 RETNO SANDINI 18 19 18 16 17 15 19 19 5 4 77 73 75

16 RIA ADDHA 18 19 16 15 16 15 18 17 4 2 72 68 70

17 RIFIL YANTO 18 18 17 15 14 15 16 18 2 3 67 69 68

18 RISA 20 19 17 15 15 14 17 19 2 2 71 69 70

19 ROSA LESMANA 18 20 16 17 16 15 19 20 4 5 73 77 75

20 SAHRI YANTO 18 19 16 16 16 15 20 17 4 3 74 70 72

21 SINTA DIAH SARI 19 18 16 16 15 15 15 20 2 4 67 73 70

22 SUHARDI 20 19 15 15 16 15 20 20 4 4 75 73 74

23 TRI PUSPITASARI 19 19 16 16 15 15 16 18 2 4 68 72 70

24 TYA RINGGON FITRIANI 18 18 16 15 15 15 15 14 2 2 66 64 65

25 UTAMI CANTIKA 19 20 18 15 14 15 18 19 2 4 71 73 72

26 VETA LOCA 18 18 15 16 16 15 18 16 2 2 69 67 68

27 YESTI KURNIA 17 19 16 15 16 15 18 17 5 2 72 68 70

Page 139: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

28 YONA AFRILIA 20 18 15 16 15 15 19 17 2 2 71 69 70

29 YUSRIZAL 17 19 16 16 18 14 18 18 5 3 74 70 72

30 ZANA PURI 20 17 15 16 16 17 20 19 5 5 76 74 75

Total 2.131

Page 140: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 11

Readability of Test ItemsChoose the correct answer by crossing (x) Yes or No in front of a right answer.

Respondent :

Class :

Day/ Date :

No. Question Yes No Scale(1-10)

Comment

1. Apakah anda paham dengan perintah(instruction) nomor satu?

2. Apakah anda paham dengan perintah(instruction) nomor dua?

3. Apakah anda paham dengan perintah(instruction) nomor tiga?

4. Apakah anda paham dengan perintah(direction) nomor satu?

5. Apakah anda paham dengan perintah(direction) nomor dua?

*1 describes an item that is easy to read and 10 describes an item that is difficultto read

Page 141: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 12

THE RESULT OF READABILITY TEST

No Students Question and Scale Total Mean1 2 3 4 5

1 ANGGA WINATA 2 2 1 7 2 14 2.82 ANISA FITRI 2 1 1 7 2 13 2.63 ANTIANA 2 2 1 3 2 10 24 ARIA SAPUTRA 1 2 1 4 2 10 25 BELLA FITRIA 2 2 1 2 1 8 1.66 CHOMSATUN ANISA 2 2 1 2 1 8 1.67 CICI EFRIDA 2 2 1 2 2 9 1.88 DIANA GUSTINA 2 1 1 3 2 9 1.89 EPRIA HUTARI 2 1 1 3 2 9 1.810 EVI IDOLA 2 2 2 2 1 9 1.811 FITRA PADLI 1 2 1 2 2 8 1.612 FITRIYANI 2 2 1 3 2 10 213 HENDRI YANTO 1 2 1 2 1 7 1.414 ILHAM SETIAWAN 1 2 1 2 3 9 1.815 JUMADI ARIPIN 2 1 1 3 1 8 1.616 LIA ROSMANI 2 1 1 2 1 7 1.417 LISA WATI 2 2 2 3 2 11 2.218 MAKMUR SIDIK 1 2 1 2 1 7 1.419 MELI PATIMAH 1 1 1 2 1 6 1.220 MELIYANTI 2 2 1 2 1 8 1.621 NISA FITRI 1 2 2 2 2 9 1.822 NUR KEMALA 1 2 2 2 1 8 1.623 RIVID YANSAH 2 1 1 2 1 7 1.424 ROBBI BILLAH 1 1 2 3 2 9 1.825 SARI UTAMI 2 1 1 3 1 8 1.626 SELI SELPIA 2 2 2 2 3 11 2.227 SINTA APRIONA 2 1 2 2 2 9 1.828 YUNITA PERMATASARI 2 1 1 2 1 7 1.429 WAHYUNI 1 2 1 3 2 9 1.830 ZURYANA 1 2 1 2 3 9 1.8

Total 53.2Mean 1.77

Page 142: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 13

Students’ Name of Try Out

NO. STUDENT’S NAMES GENDER CODE1 ANGGA WINATA M AW2 ANISA FITRI F AF3 ANTIANA F A

4 ARIA SAPUTRA M AS5 BELLA FITRIA F BF6 CHOMSATUN ANISA F CA

7 CICI EFRIDA F CE8 DIANA GUSTINA F DG

9 EPRIA HUTARI F EH10 EVI IDOLA F EI11 FITRA PADLI M FP

12 FITRIYANI F FI13 HENDRI YANTO M HY14 ILHAM SETIAWAN M IS

15 JUMADI ARIPIN M JA16 LIA ROSMANI F LR

17 LISA WATI F LW18 MAKMUR SIDIK M MS19 MELI PATIMAH F MP

20 MELIYANTI F ME21 NISA FITRI F NF22 NUR KEMALA F NK

23 RIVID YANSAH M RY24 ROBBI BILLAH M RB25 SARI UTAMI F SU

26 SELI SELPIA F SS27 SINTA APRIONA F SA

28 YUNITA PERMATASARI F YP29 WAHYUNI F WA30 ZURYANA F ZU

Page 143: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 14

Students’ Name of Sample

NO. STUDENT’S NAMES GENDER CODE1 ALDI ARDIANSYAH M AA

2 AMANDA SAPUTRA M AS3 CHICA MEILINDA F CM4 DEDI SABARI M DS

5 DELIMA NURMUSIAH F DN6 DEWI SARTIKA F DS7 JULIO FATONI M JF

8 LETI SUSANTI F LS9 MAYA PATWA RENI F MPR

10 MEDI YANTO M MY

11 MELDA SAFITRI F MS12 NANI ANJAINI F NA

13 NOVA YANTI F NY14 RAFKI IDRUS M RI15 RETNO SANDINI F RS

16 RIA ADDHA F RA17 RIFIL YANTO M RY18 RISA F RI

19 ROSA LESMANA F RL20 SAHRI YANTO M SY21 SINTA DIAH SARI F SDS

22 SUHARDI M SU23 TRI PUSPITASARI F TP

24 TYA RINGGON FITRIANI F TRF25 UTAMI CANTIKA F UC26 VETA LOCA F VL

27 YESTI KURNIA F YK28 YONA AFRILIA F YA29 YUSRIZAL M YU

30 ZANA PURI F ZP

Page 144: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 15

Score of Try Out Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

NO. STUDENT’S NAMES GENDER CODE SCORE1 ANGGA WINATA M AW 62

2 ANISA FITRI F AF 503 ANTIANA F A 504 ARIA SAPUTRA M AS 22

5 BELLA FITRIA F BF 846 CHOMSATUN ANISA F CA 747 CICI EFRIDA F CE 22

8 DIANA GUSTINA F DG 389 EPRIA HUTARI F EH 70

10 EVI IDOLA F EI 7811 FITRA PADLI M FP 5812 FITRIYANI F FI 34

13 HENDRI YANTO M HY 2814 ILHAM SETIAWAN M IS 3215 JUMADI ARIPIN M JA 18

16 LIA ROSMANI F LR 7217 LISA WATI F LW 5018 MAKMUR SIDIK M MS 32

19 MELI PATIMAH F MP 4420 MELIYANTI F ME 68

21 NISA FITRI F NF 7022 NUR KEMALA F NK 4023 RIVID YANSAH M RY 70

24 ROBBI BILLAH M RB 6025 SARI UTAMI F SU 7626 SELI SELPIA F SS 72

27 SINTA APRIONA F SA 6228 YUNITA PERMATASARI F YP 7229 WAHYUNI F WA 38

30 ZURYANA F ZU 36

Page 145: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 16

Score of Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

NO. STUDENT’S NAMES GENDER CODE SCORE1 ALDI ARDIANSYAH M AA 75

2 AMANDA SAPUTRA M AS 803 CHICA MEILINDA F CM 704 DEDI SABARI M DS 45

5 DELIMA NURMUSIAH F DN 506 DEWI SARTIKA F DS 607 JULIO FATONI M JF 55

8 LETI SUSANTI F LS 509 MAYA PATWA RENI F MPR 45

10 MEDI YANTO M MY 6511 MELDA SAFITRI F MS 7512 NANI ANJAINI F NA 65

13 NOVA YANTI F NY 7514 RAFKI IDRUS M RI 5515 RETNO SANDINI F RS 60

16 RIA ADDHA F RA 6017 RIFIL YANTO M RY 4018 RISA F RI 65

19 ROSA LESMANA F RL 8520 SAHRI YANTO M SY 75

21 SINTA DIAH SARI F SDS 6522 SUHARDI M SU 6023 TRI PUSPITASARI F TP 65

24 TYA RINGGON FITRIANI F TRF 3025 UTAMI CANTIKA F UC 7526 VETA LOCA F VL 50

27 YESTI KURNIA F YK 7028 YONA AFRILIA F YA 4529 YUSRIZAL M YU 80

30 ZANA PURI F ZP 88

Page 146: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 17

Score of Writing Descriptive Text Test

NO. STUDENT’S NAMES GENDER CODE SCORE1 ALDI ARDIANSYAH M AA 72

2 AMANDA SAPUTRA M AS 723 CHICA MEILINDA F CM 704 DEDI SABARI M DS 70

5 DELIMA NURMUSIAH F DN 756 DEWI SARTIKA F DS 687 JULIO FATONI M JF 70

8 LETI SUSANTI F LS 729 MAYA PATWA RENI F MPR 65

10 MEDI YANTO M MY 7211 MELDA SAFITRI F MS 7412 NANI ANJAINI F NA 68

13 NOVA YANTI F NY 7514 RAFKI IDRUS M RI 7215 RETNO SANDINI F RS 75

16 RIA ADDHA F RA 7017 RIFIL YANTO M RY 6818 RISA F RI 70

19 ROSA LESMANA F RL 7520 SAHRI YANTO M SY 72

21 SINTA DIAH SARI F SDS 7022 SUHARDI M SU 7423 TRI PUSPITASARI F TP 70

24 TYA RINGGON FITRIANI F TRF 6525 UTAMI CANTIKA F UC 7226 VETA LOCA F VL 68

27 YESTI KURNIA F YK 7028 YONA AFRILIA F YA 7029 YUSRIZAL M YU 72

30 ZANA PURI F ZP 75

Page 147: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 18

RekapAnalisisButirSoalTry Out of Simple Present Tense Mastery

Rata-Rata = 28.37 Simpang Baku = 7.45 Korelasi XY = 0.76

Reliabilitas Tes = 0.86 Butir Soal = 50 Jumlah Subyek = 30

ButirAsli DayaPembeda (%) TingkatKesukaran Korelasi Sign. Korelasi

1 50.00 Mudah 0.474 Sangat Signifikan

2 62.50 Sedang 0.503 Sangat Signifikan

3 -12.50 Sangat mudah -0.193 -

4 25.00 Sangat sukar 0.260 -

5 25.00 Sangat mudah 0.232 -

6 25.00 Sukar 0.198 -

7 12.50 Sedang 0.182 -

8 25.00 Sukar 0.220 -

9 0.00 Sangat mudah -0.105 -

10 87.50 Sedang 0.858 SangatSignifikan

11 0.00 Sedang -0.038 -

12 37.50 Sedang 0.189 -

13 25.00 Mudah 0.389 Sangat Signifikan

14 50.00 Sedang 0.368 Sangat Signifikan

15 12.50 Mudah 0.266 -

16 50.00 Sukar 0.434 Sangat Signifikan

17 75.00 Sedang 0.555 Sangat Signifikan

18 50.00 Sedang 0.441 Sangat Signifikan

19 37.50 Mudah 0.361 Sangat Signifikan

20 25.00 Sedang 0.387 SangatSignifikan

21 25.00 Sedang 0.363 Sangat Signifikan

22 50.00 Sukar 0.446 Sangat Signifikan

Page 148: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

23 62.50 Sukar 0.682 SangatSignifikan

24 62.50 Sedang 0.461 Sangat Signifikan

25 12.50 Sangat mudah 0.199 -

26 25.00 Mudah 0.376 SangatSignifikan

27 50.00 Sukar 0.525 Sangat Signifikan

28 0.00 Sedang -0.002 -

29 75.00 Mudah 0.694 SangatSignifikan

30 37.50 Sedang 0.403 Sangat Signifikan

31 37.50 Sukar 0.305 Signifikan

32 37.50 Sedang 0.388 Sangat Signifikan

33 25.00 Sukar 0.214 -

34 50.00 Sedang 0.438 Sangat Signifikan

35 50.00 Sedang 0.466 SangatSignifikan

36 25.00 Sedang 0.085 -

37 0.00 Sedang 0.199 -

38 75.00 Sedang 0.633 Sangat Signifikan

39 37.50 Sukar 0.275 Signifikan

40 -25.00 Sedang -0.085 -

41 25.00 Sangat mudah 0.180 -

42 25.00 Sukar 0.037 -

43 0.00 Sangat mudah 0.047 -

44 62.50 Sedang 0.450 Sangat Signifikan

45 75.00 Sedang 0.681 Sangat Signifikan

46 25.00 Sedang 0.145 -

47 50.00 Mudah 0.606 Sangat Signifikan

48 37.50 Sedang 0.442 Sangat Signifikan

49 25.00 Sangat mudah 0.320 Signifikan

50 25.00 Sangat mudah 0.368 Sangat Signifikan

Page 149: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

121

APPENDIX 20

Rekap Analisis Butir Soal Simple Present Tense Mastery after Try Out

Rata-Rata = 28.27 Simpang Baku = 7.40 Korelasi XY = 0.74

Reliabilitas Tes = 0.82 Butir Soal = 30 Jumlah Subyek = 30

ButirAsli

Daya Pembeda (%) TingkatKesukaran

Korelasi Sign. Korelasi

1 50.00 Mudah 0.474 SangatSignifikan

2 62.50 Sedang 0.503 SangatSignifikan

3 -12.50 Sangat mudah -0.193 -

4 25.00 Sangat sukar 0.260 -

5 50.00 Mudah 0.606Sangat

Signifikan

6 37.50 Sedang 0.442Sangat

Signifikan

7 25.00 Sangat mudah 0.320 Signifikan

8 25.00 Sangat mudah 0.368Sangat

Signifikan

9 0.00 Sangat mudah -0.105 -

10 87.50 Sedang 0.858Sangat

Signifikan

11 0.00 Sedang -0.038 -

12 37.50 Sedang 0.189 -

13 25.00 Mudah 0.389 SangatSignifikan

14 50.00 Sedang 0.368 SangatSignifikan

15 12.50 Mudah 0.266 -

Page 150: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

122

16 50.00 Sukar 0.434 SangatSignifikan

17 75.00 Sedang 0.555Sangat

Signifikan

18 50.00 Sedang 0.441Sangat

Signifikan

19 37.50 Mudah 0.361Sangat

Signifikan

20 25.00 Sedang 0.387 SangatSignifikan

21 25.00 Sedang 0.363Sangat

Signifikan

22 50.00 Sukar 0.446Sangat

Signifikan

23 62.50 Sukar 0.682Sangat

Signifikan

24 62.50 Sedang 0.461Sangat

Signifikan

25 12.50 Sangat mudah 0.199 -

26 25.00 Mudah 0.376Sangat

Signifikan

27 50.00 Sukar 0.525Sangat

Signifikan

28 0.00 Sedang -0.002 -

29 75.00 Mudah 0.694Sangat

Signifikan

30 37.50 Sedang 0.403Sangat

Signifikan

Page 151: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 20

Score and Descriptive Statistics in Students’ Simple Present Tense Mastery

Statistics

N Valid 30Missing 0

Mean 62.6000

Std. Error of Mean 2.57780

Median 6.333E1a

Mode 65.00b

Std. Deviation 1.4119E1

Variance 199.352

Range 58.00Minimum 30.00

Maximum 88.00

Sum 1878.00

Score

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 30 1 3.3 3.3 3.340 1 3.3 3.3 6.645 3 10.0 10.0 16.650 3 10.0 10.0 26.655 2 6.7 6.7 33.360 4 13.3 13.3 46.665 5 16.7 16.7 63.370 2 6.7 6.7 70.075 5 16.7 16.7 86.780 2 6.7 6.7 93.485 1 3.3 3.3 96.788 1 3.3 3.3 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Page 152: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 21

Score and Descriptive Statistics in Writing Descriptive Text

Statistics

N Valid 30Missing 0

Mean 71.0333

Std. Error of Mean .50624

Median 7.105E1a

Mode 70.00

Std. Deviation 2.77282

Variance 7.689

Range 10.00

Minimum 65.00

Maximum 75.00

Sum 2131.00

Score

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid 65 2 6.7 6.7 6.7

68 4 13.3 13.3 20.0

70 9 30.0 30.0 50.0

72 8 26.7 26.7 76.7

74 2 6.7 6.7 83.3

75 5 16.7 16.7 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Page 153: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

APPENDIX 22

DATA ANALYSIS

NORMALITY OF THE SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE MASTERY

Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic Df Sig.

Present Tense .976 30 .713

NORMALITY OF THE WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT

RESULT OF LINEARITY TEST

ANOVA Table

Sum of

Squares df

Mean

Square F Sig.

descripti

ve text *

tense

Between Groups (Combined) 122.717 11 11.156 2.181 .069

Linearity 46.163 1 46.163 9.024 .008

Deviation from

Linearity76.554 10 7.655 1.496 .219

Within Groups 92.083 18 5.116

Total 214.800 29

Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic Df Sig.

Descriptive Text .921 30 .029

Page 154: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

RESULT OF HYPOTHETICAL TESTINGNonparametric Correlations (Rank Spearman’s)

Correlations

Presenttens

e

Descriptivete

xt

Spearman's rho Presenttense Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .557**

Sig. (2-tailed) . .001

N 30 30

Descriptivete

xt

Correlation Coefficient .557** 1.000

Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .

N 30 30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Page 155: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

113

APPENDIX 13

Answer Key for Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

1. D 11. D 21.D 31. C

2. C 12. B 22. A 32. D

3. A 13. B 23. B 33. B

4. A 14. A 24. A 34. B

5. C 15. C 25. A 35. B

6. C 16. A 26. A 36. B

7. A 17. A 27. B 37. A

8. A 18. B 28. B 38. B

9. C 19. D 29. B 39. A

10. B 20. C 30. A 40. A

Page 156: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

104

APPENDIX 10

Answer key for Try Out Simple Present Tense Mastery Test

1. D 11. D 21.D 31. B 41. B

2. C 12. B 22. A 32. A 42. C

3. A 13. B 23. B 33. C 43. D

4. A 14. A 24. A 34. C 44. B

5. C 15. C 25. A 35. D 45. B

6. C 16. A 26. A 36. B 46. A

7. A 17. A 27. A 37. C 47. A

8. A 18. B 28. A 38. B 48. B

9. C 19. D 29. B 39. A 49. A

10. B 20. C 30. B 40. B 50. A

Page 157: THE CORRELATION BETWEEN STUDENTS’ SIMPLE PRESENT …repository.radenintan.ac.id/291/1/skripsi.pdf · the correlation between students’ simple present tense mastery and their ability

85

APPENDIX 2

The Teacher and Staff of SMPN 1 Karya Penggawa Pesisir Barat

No. Nama Mata Pelajaran1. Markoni, S.Pd Kepala Sekolah2. Elliyoni, S.Pd Bahasa Indonesia3. Zalika Pudi, S.Pd Bahasa Lampung4. Drs. Meizal Bimbingan Konseling5. Dra. Hayati Aini PAI6. Heni Margareta Dwi Putri, S.Pd IPA Terpadu7. Daninar, S.Pd Bahasa Indonesia8. Yusef Efendi, S.Pd Penjaskes9. Dedi Gustiawan, S.Pd Matematika

10. Nopia Hartati, S.Pd TIK11. Rahmat Nursan, S.Pd IPS Terpadu12. Edison Hakim, S.Sos IPS Terpadu13. Riza Liston, Amd.Pd Pkn14. Melda Wati, S.Pd Bahasa Inggris15. Sri Fathul Aini, S.Pd PAI16. Aya Sopia, S.Pd Pkn17. Burman, S.Pd Penjaskes18. Arsya Eka Wati, S.Pd Seni Budaya19. Ria Maya Sari, S.Pd Sulam Tapis20. Nili Sartika, S.Pd IPA Terpadu21. Ramadona Fitri, S.Pd Matematika22. Yosa Suhendra, S.Pd Tata Usaha23. Feti Budiana, S.Pd Bahasa Inggris24. Yuniarti, S.Pd Bahasa Inggris25. Herman, S.Pd Penjaskes26. Siska Purnamasari, S.Pd Matematika27. Intan Yulia, S.Pd Bahasa Indonesia28. Hari Patriansyah, S.Pd Tata Usaha29. Lisa Fitria Marlina Tata Usaha30. Erwansyah Tata Usaha31. Widia Sari, S.Pd Bimbingan Konseling

Source: documentation of the Data of Teacher and Staff of SMPN 1 Karya PenggawaPesisir Barat in 2016/2017 Academic Year.