the ariga project stakeholder's perspective

34
ARIGA’S STAKEHOLDER PRELIMINARY RESULTS SHARING WORKSHOP CETRAD’S SOCIAL SURVEY ANALYSIS MAY 26 TH 2014 World Agroforestry Centre (WAC), NAIROBI Sarah Ogalleh & Alex Oduor

Upload: world-agroforestry-centre

Post on 24-Jan-2015

201 views

Category:

Science


3 download

DESCRIPTION

World Agroforestry Center Production

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

ARIGA’S STAKEHOLDER PRELIMINARY RESULTS SHARING

WORKSHOP

CETRAD’S SOCIAL SURVEY ANALYSIS MAY 26TH 2014

World Agroforestry Centre (WAC), NAIROBISarah Ogalleh & Alex Oduor

Page 2: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Data collection clusters • Cluster 1: Gotu springs: near the Ewaso Ngiro River .

The spring is protected by fence (Isiolo county)

• Cluster 2: Kubikalo, Kom, Dimatho, Biliqo, Biliqo marara, Bulesa, Goda, Malkafunan, Merti (Isiolo County)

• Cluster 3: Malkagala, Basa (Isiolo County)

• Cluster 4: Modogash (remote urban setting) (Wajir County)

Page 3: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

• Cluster 5: Habaswein: (Habaswein township- considered urban setting) (Wajir County)

• Cluster 6: Wajir: urban setting (Wajir County)

• *Cluster 7: Dadaab: refugee camp (not visited) (Garissa County)

Data collection clusters

Page 4: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

METHODOLOGY

Page 5: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

METHODS

• Household surveys (HH) (Total: 151)

• Expert Interviews (Total: 4)

• Key informant Interviews (KI) (Total: 30); WV:16, RWC: 2

• Focus group discussions (FGDs) (Total: 8)

Participant Observation, informal interviews

Page 6: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS • Targeted households from every cluster, closed

questions (Quantitative data), & open ended questions (Qualitative data).

• Language of communication – Swahili, Somali & Borana

Page 7: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Key informant interviewsTargeted the local leaders, local water service providers’ leadership, county leadership, development organizations (local and international NGOs); Water vendors, random water collectors

Page 8: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Focus group discussions (FGDs)• Mostly attended by 15-35 persons per meeting in

all the sites • Language of communication – English, Kiswahili,

Borana, Somali (with the help of a translator in different sites)

Page 9: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Expert Interviews • Targeted the water ministers – at county levels,

water experts – formerly at district levels – water engineers

Page 10: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

PRELIMINARY RESULTS

Page 11: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Are households aware of the Merti Wajir Water Pipeline project, & where was the

information sourced?

Page 12: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective
Page 13: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective
Page 14: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Understanding of the Merti Wajir Water Pipeline Project

Page 15: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective
Page 16: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Who supports, who opposes, to what extent?

Page 17: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective
Page 18: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Categories of Supporters/Opposers

• High Interest – in favour of the Merti Wajir Water Pipeline project

• High interest – opposed to the project

• Low interest – neutral to the project

• Do not know/In doubt/unsure due to lack of information

Page 19: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Overview of reasons for supporting or opposing the project (summary)

Page 20: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

A) High interest – in favour of the project

• The Wajir County Government –

• The governor, • the water minister• County commissioner • Local leadership in Wajir,

Habaswein, Modogash • NGO’s especially CRS,

CARITAS, Pastoral organization in Wajir, ADESO-Isiolo,

• Majority of Wajir community

Reasons for position – WASH -water sanitation and

health will be enhanced - dignity of people of Wajir –

now using bucket toilets- Political mileage (not

mentioned, may be a good reason for support)

Page 21: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective
Page 22: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

What would make those supporting change their minds?

Page 23: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective
Page 24: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

B) High interest: Opposed to the project

Persons/Institutions• Jiko la Akina mama women

group (Habaswein) – very powerful and vigilant

• Community in Habaswein, Dimatho, Biliqo, Bulesa

Reasons for position• Sustainability of the water

over the years

• ‘….We do not have any water, if there is any water underground, we should have it first. I understand that Wajir people have some salty water, at least they have some water, we don’t have any!...’

Page 25: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective
Page 26: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective
Page 27: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

C) Low interest: Neutral• A few Individual

community members from Wajir (‘..why would they give us ‘their’ water, let us look for our own water’)

• Some of the community members at Gotu springs (“…if our chief has said its ok to take water to Wajir, I don’t have a problem…he has said it!”) (Gotu female household interviewee, April 2014)

Reasons for position • Need for exploration of

other alternatives for water sourcing other than the Merti Wajir Water Pipeline Project – ‘independence sort of feeling’

• Local leadership voice support

• The project will not affect them

Page 28: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

D) Do not know/In doubt/unsure due to lack of information

Individual/community • Gotu local leadership

• Communities from Malkagalla, Bulesa, Basa

• Community in Merti

Reasons for the position • ‘We don’t know if the water

is taken to Wajir, it will affect our spring/our boreholes, if it will not, then we support, if it does, then we don’t support it, but we do not have information to help us make that decision’

• ‘We want information to be able to decide if we support or not!’

Page 29: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

• Demand for payment for meeting attendance in some places.

• The poor road network • Communication barriers • Acclimatization related challenges – weather,

food that caused many of the team members to get sick

• Project names issues – ‘Merti Wajir water pipeline’ versus ‘Wajir project’ versus ‘Habaswein project’

Challenges

Page 30: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Conclusions • The proposed project of Merti Wajir Water

Pipeline Project is not known to majority of the persons in the 6 sites we visited. Out of the 6 clusters, only Wajir and Habaswein are well informed, but then for the wrong reasons.

• The other sites : Merti, Malkagala, Bulesa, Goda, Biliqo, Basa, Gotu are not aware of the project. Very few from these areas are aware of the project, but through ‘word of mouth’ & other unreliable sources.

Page 31: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Conclusions • The power of the local leadership to change the

perceptions of the people about the project – but it will take at least 6 months of in-depth negotiation

• The biggest obstacles to the project could be the Habaswein Community, mostly – Jiko la akina mama women group. Men from Habaswein and local leadership are not entirely against the project, and can be easily convinced to support the project with good reasons

Page 32: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Conclusions • ‘Could it be a pipe dream?’ The proposition to

explore other sources of water for Wajir, other than the Merti Wajir Water pipeline project can be mostly associated with doubt that the Merti Wajir Water Pipeline project will ever be ‘realized’.

Page 33: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

Acknowledgements • Local communities from Wajir,

Habaswein, Modogash, Isiolo, Merti, Basa,Malkagalla, Bulesa, Goda, Malkafnan

• The local leadership – chiefs & sub-chiefs from the various clusters

• The water service providers – Merti, Basa, Bulesa

• Senator (Wajir), MP- Diriiye, Eng. Mohamed, Water Minister- Wajir & others

• ICRAF & CETRAD ARIGA staff • The Research & data entry team:

Shamsa, Fahriya, Abdifattah, Jillo, Abdi, Alex & Sarah, Dickson and Mercy

Page 34: The ariga project stakeholder's perspective

The end

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Questions, comments are welcome