technical success marketing the wine industry to different ... · unpredictable. marketing...
TRANSCRIPT
1,51011) methods and boddinrq I,
Media used to Retail promotion Television
reach them ('dot Font
Radio Direct sales
How they relate Dijital Allots Digital Immigrants
to technology
How they view brends Then & Now Then - a mattssler of
A prmluct identttier tntst
anti a ntaticor of Now—a
hoof diminishing loyalty
Slogans of their limes Ford: Volkswagen:
"Freedom for the "A Volkswagen is
woman who owns never changed to
Find" make it look
ddtemnf only to
make it work better"
Peecontpopulation 13 24
Woikforce now 2 36
Workforce 2020 (pc) 0 16
Adapted from McCridle and Wollinger, 2009, McCridle and Seard, 2001
Technical success
Marketing the wine industry to different generations
What if our marketing efforts miss the market altogether?
John Ryan
Centre for Wine Excellence
Department of Environment and Agriculture
School of Science
Curtin University
PMB 1
Margaret River, WA 6285
Mark Gibberd
Centre for Wine Excellence
Department of Environment and Agriculture
School of Science
Curtin University
Marketing
research profiles will need to alter drastically to persuade Generatlee V to gtadaote from alcnpspn and beet to wine rather than to beer and spirits.
Builders Boomers Den X Den Y/Gen Z
Telling it Selling it Questioning it Protesting it T 1-111 future of the wine industry will
depend increavingly on todays young
people. What if the marketing messages
completely miss thent? Are different
generations fundatnentatty different? Older
people (the first author is a senior Builder,
and the second is Generation X) are often
bemused by the changes in technological
savvy, valttev, expectations and behaviour of
younger people. Is this something new? The
answer is probably yes and the dislocation
reflects very real differences in generations.
This paper will define and examine the
getlerations, and then discuss the different
marketing strategies which should attract
each group.
The GeneratIons
'l'oday generational cohorts are changing
rapidly and being defined by new
tectanologies, changing career and study
options and staifting societal values. Current
definitions refer to a cohort of people born
within a similar span of time (around 15
years), who share a comparable age and life
stage and were shaped by a particular period.
Six distinctive generational cohorts have
emerged in the last 80 odd years (McCrindle
and Beard, 2007) (McCrindle and Wolfinger,
21109).
Builders
Born betweett 1925 and 1946 and
sometimes referred to as the 1.ucky
Generation, (Mackay, 1997) Builders are
largely the parents of the next two
generations. The dominant influences on
thetn were the Great Depression and World
War It (for which they were too young to
participate). The tough times endured by
their parents said the austerity of the 1930s
and the war years gave them a strong svork
ethic, fittancial conservatism, respect for
authority figures and commitment to a boss,
industry or brand. After World War It, this
generation shared in the boomitag prosperity
and found it easy to access jobs, higher
education and success because they were in
short supply. This, combined with their
seemingly illogical cotaservatism, has
enabled them to accumulate wealth and
generally enjoy a cotnfortable rettrenaent.
i'heir value systems influenced Inot always
successfultyl their children, the Baby
Boomers (McCrindte and Beard, 2007).
Baby Boomers (1946-64)
The end of World War II was seen as a key
social marker in the western world of the
twentieth century. 'the Depression and the
war years were replaced by ecottomic growth
and full employment. Technological
advancennent, no doubt accelerated by the
demands of war, ended austeriey and
brought increasing freedona. (McCrindle and
Beard, 2007) Muds more importantly, it
ushered in an unparalleled baby boom and
immigration programnae, particularly its
Canada, the United States, New Zealand and
Attstralia (Foot and Stoffman, 2000).The
fertility rate rose rapidly between 1946 and
1961, thets fell to just below the 1946 level by
1965. These changes very clearly delineated
the Baby Roomer generation (McCrindle and
Beard, 2007). This is the wealthiest living
generation and is moving from the wrrrkfrirce
into retirement and major changes of
lifestyle. In their younger days, Brlw
Boonters were hedonistic, rebellious and
dedicated to freedom. They were arid are
hard working, they work longer and retite
How they learn Passive
What appeals to them Aut)torilariatt
Sense of duty
and loyalty
Artjumeslise
Apologixtic
How messages
Naive images and
were/are
cnpy blending
executed
emotrve and rational
appeals
later. Their value systems pit)' sortie tribute to
their Buikter parents, and will at least be
available to their Gen Y children, many of
tvltotnm are still living at Inome.
1 eneration X (1965-1979)
Sometimes referred to as Baby Busters
toot and Stoffniams, 20001 or the Options
(eneration (Mackay, 1997). The tower
fertility rates reflected the adoptiota of the
lii rth control pill, greater participation of
ivomen in the workforce and the trend
towards postponing childbirth (Foot and
btoffman, 21100). After the post Baby Boomer
nw, births (leaked in the early 1970s before
rIropping back to another low in 1979. The
peak year's births of 1972 stood for three
(evades although the population was by
lien Ott per cent larger than in 1972 . This
generation has faceri a much less buoyant
r'niploymuent environment, and is facing
lower levels of opportunity. Gen Xers are
ouch less trusting of governments and
employers. They face mortgage seress and
lmigtm debt levels, This is the generation
which, in tlneir teens, have had to adapt to
internet technology.
Generation Y (1980-1995)
Sometimes labelled as ttae 'Echo Boom'
(Foot and Stoffman, 2000), or the Net
Generation )iivpscott, 2009). They are
getterally the children of the Baby Bootners A
key feature of this and sutsequent
generatiotts is that they were born with
internet tectinology developed and available.
They are sonaerintes referred to as Digttal
Natives. They appear to be fundamentally
differene to previous generations, to the
point that some experts believe their broins
are wired differently (Tapscott, 2009). Their
unprecedented access to information and to
communication places them in global
networks of their peers. t-lalf of them live in
the tarental home (McCrindle and Wotfinger,
2009(. They have and use internet access to
be completely informed on products and
services before committing to buy, and they
Formal Programmed Interactive
Monologue Dialogue Multi-media
fhahorial-Factuul Rshelhinoo poxtering Spostaneoas
Tec)tnical data Multi-tensory
Evidence Participatory
Product compari005 Anti-ado
Demonstration Visual exatnp)es
Pop culture
let eresces
Television
Font
Digital Maptives Digital Natives
A philosophy A commesity
hike: ItmuTabe
"lant not a target "Broadcast
market. I oman yourself"
athlete"
2) 21/19
44 18/0
37 35/12
Eaperimentsl
marketing: viral
ambient, stunt
Web commuitities with user
generated contest
(i.e. Ynulube,
Myflpace etc.)
Internet
SMS
32 GrapeGrowers & Vignerons August 2010
Marketirrg appteaches which engage Balmy Booiir,,-ei tourism esperience. Showing the start behiird the wine and buildurq the toni mu: eopi'nemmm.e will 41151:1111010 COiI000IUlS
ii:,..] C , .. ,.r::,Jr 11W l:itii I•:: Jt,i, FC:.:::. ICI: I[:CC
Technical success scant a say in how their needs are met. They have high, perhaps unrealistic, expectations of rapid advancement. They will seek fluid working and career arrangements. They put enjoyment before commitment and see friends as the new family. They are possibly the first global community. This generation's attitudes to co-innovation are already influencing the way some major organisations go about their business (Tapscott and Williams, 2006).
Generation Z This generation is variously defined
as ranging from 1995-2007 (Tapscott, 2009), (McCrindle and Beard, 2007), or 1995-2010 (Foot and Stoffman, 2000). These small variations reflect the absence of up-to-date data. In Australia, the Generation Z definition reflects the decline in fertility rates over the last few decades. Up-to-date information on births confirms that the upturn in fertility observed in 2006 has continued through to 2009. Given that Generation Z will consist largely of the children of Generation X, it is fair to speculate that the very latest generation (Alpha) is seeing the entry of Generation Y into child-bearing around 2007 in Australia. From a marketing perspective, Gen Zers are stilt in their childhood or early teens. They will en)oy all the empowerment and sophistication provided by technology, a global community perspective and hovering parents.
Generation Alpha (McCrindte and Beard, 2007).
This latest generation, just born, or, at least, less than three years of age,
will be the children of Generation Y and will herald the first complete families of so-called Digital Natives.
Marketing to the Generations Generational awareness has a place
in the marketing profile of any organisation, particularly one which is going beyond products and services to offer unique experiences to consumers (Pine and Gilmore, 1999). Some understanding of the values, attitudes and expectations of each generation will be invaluable in shaping marketing strategies.
The wealthiest generations are the Builders and Baby Boomers. By definition, their numbers are declining and their residual wealth will gravitate to Generations X and Y or be dissipated. Generation X is reaching an age where its members should be the backbone of the market, but it tnay lack the econonsic clout of previous generations. Generation Y. white it is undoubtedly the wave of the future, will also be the most unpredictable. Marketing approaches svhich have succeeded with Builders and Boomers may not resonate at all with Generations Y and Z, and, decreasingly with Generation X. The table to the left stimniarises Australian thinking on the different marketing approaches apprupriate to each generation.
The different approaches reflect the characteristics of each generation. There is a pattern of direct marketing media with Builders, Booiners and Xers. However, generations from V onwards use increasingly sophisticated interactive internet media to communicate with each
other and to be the most informed group in history. They rarely watch live television and tend to skip advertising when they watch recorded programmes. They typically do not read newspapers. They like to co-innovate in the development of their product experiences (Tapscott and Williams, 2006). This can only be achieved by engaging them and by using the electronic media that supports them. The four Ps - product, price, place and promotion— need to be replaced with the ABCDE of marketing to the Net Generation (V) - anyplace, brand, communication, discovery and experience )Tapscott, 2009).
An important aspect of marketing to Generation V is In remember that they are the children of the Baby Boomners. Marketing approaches which engage Baby Boomer consumers may provide leverage In introducing their children to the wine and svine tourism experience.
Marketing research profiles will need to alter drastically to persuade Generation V to graduate from alcopops and beer to wine rather than to, say, beer and spirits. Given their age
profile, the need is urgent. Generational research will need to explore the behaviour patterns, values and expectations of the new generations. This will go beyond surveys and statistics, and will require a new breed of researchers (Anderson, 2009). The wine tourism experience may be an important factor in aiding this transition (Pine and Gilmore, 1999).
The longevity of a successful marketing impact needs to be considered in generational terms. Gen Vers are now 15-30 years of age. Average Gen Yers will have 50 or so years of wine consumption if they are engaged now. Their Itaby Boomer parents have on average 20 or less years of wine consumption left if they have become committed wine consumers. Barring major social upheavals or ground-breaking technological innovations, marketing approaches which engage Generation Y can be expected to resonate with subsequent generations, just as the four Ps have largely resonated with Builders, Baby Boomers, and, to some extent, Geix Xers.
fflWIphy
ANDERSON, K. (2009) Ethnographic Research: A Key to Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 87, 24-24.
FOOT, H. K. & STOFFMAN, H. (2000) Boom, Bust & Echo: Profiting front the Demographic Shift in the 21st Century, Toronto, Stoddart Publishing Company.
MACKAY, H. (1997) Generations, Baby Roomers,
their parents and their children, Sydney, Pan Mcmillan Australia Pty ltd.
MCCRINDLE, M. & BEARD, M. (2007) Seriously Cool. Baulkhain Hills.
MCCRINDLE, M. & WOLFINGER, E. (2009) TheABC of XYZ, Understanding the Global Generations, Sydney, University of New South Wales Press Ltd.
PINE, B. J. & GILM ORE, J. H. (1999) The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre & Every Business o Stage, Boston, Massachusetts, 1-larvard Business School Press.
TAPSCO1'T, H. (2009) Grown up Digital, Hoit' the Net Generation is Changing the World, New York, McGraw-Hill.
TAPSCOT'r, H. &W1LLIAMS,A. H. (2006) Wikittomics: How Mass
Collaboration Changes
Everything, New York, Portfolio.
GrapeGrowera & Vignerons, Aagust 2010 33