six sigma 1 intro

Upload: ankitnagrath

Post on 02-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    1/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Introduction to Six Sigma

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    2/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Whats in a name?

    Sigma is the Greek letter representing the standard deviation of apopulation of data.

    Sigma is a measure

    of variation (the data spread) variation

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    3/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    What does variation mean?

    Variation means that a

    process does not produce

    the same result (the Y)

    every time.

    Variation exists in everything. Even the best machine cannot make

    every unit exactly the same. Some variation will exist.

    Variation directly affects customer experiences.

    Customers do not feel averages!

    -10

    -5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    4/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Reduce Variation to Improve

    Performance

    Put another way, Sigma level measures how often we meet (or failto meet) the requirement(s) of our customer(s).

    s

    x

    30 min. or less

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    How many standard

    deviations can you

    fit within customer

    expectations?

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    5/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Process Performance: ExampleThe pizza delivery example. . .

    Customers want their pizzadelivered fast!

    Guarantee = 30 minutes or less

    What if we measured performance and found an averagedelivery time of 23.5 minutes?

    On-time performance is great, right?

    Our customers must be happy with us, right?

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    6/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    How often are we delivering on time?

    Managing by the average doesnt tell the whole story. The average andthe variation togethershow whats happening.

    s

    x

    30 min. or less

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Answer: Look at

    the variation!

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    7/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Improved capability to reduce processvar iation and defects, becomes a

    necessity, due to the need of :

    Improved designs

    Lower costs

    Better performance

    All of this leads to the ability to operate

    to a tight tolerance, without producing

    defects and becomes a major advantage

    to the organization.

    Improve Process Variation & Defect Rates

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    8/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    What is Six Sigma

    Six Sigma is a highly disciplined approach, which

    relies heavily on statistical tools, used to reduce

    process variations to such a great extent that the level

    of defects is reduced to less than 3.4 per millionprocess, product, or service opportunities.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    9/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    What is Six Sigma - Example?The wait time is 7.5 minutes. The standard deviation of the

    process is 1 min. Then six sigma from the centerline is 1.5minutes (in the negative direction and 13.5 minutes (in the

    positive direction). The customer wait time should not

    exceed 13.5 minutes 2 times in a billion opportunities.

    xx1.5 13.57.5

    Centerline

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    10/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Six Sigma is not

    In the example, we said the customer wait time should not

    exceed 13.5 minutes 2 times in a billion opportunities. Butthe accepted error rate in Six Sigma is 3.4 defects in a

    million opportunities. Why the difference?

    s

    1.5 Sigma

    In Six Sigma, the long termmean is shifted by 1.5 Sigma.

    This is because external failure

    rates seem to be consistently

    higher than expected when

    measured by internal estimates.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    11/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Six Sigma is.

    In other words, 4.5 standard deviations is used as an

    acceptable measure of performance and this comes to 3.4

    defects in a million opportunities. Though the derivation is

    arbitrary, it is the accepted norm.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    12/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Six-Sigma Metrics Defectany mistake or error that is passed on to a customer

    Defects per unit (DPU) = number of defects discovered number of units produced

    Defects per million opportunities (DPMO) = DPU 1,000,000 opportunities for error

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    13/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Comparing on a Sigma Scale

    In a world at 3 sigma. . .

    There are 964 flight cancellationsper day in India.

    The police make 7 false arrestsevery 4 minutes.

    In Calcutta Hospital, 5,390newborns die each year.

    In one hour, 47,283 international

    long distance calls areaccidentally disconnected.

    In a world at 6 sigma. . .

    1 is cancelled every 3 weeks inIndia.

    There are fewer than 4 falsearrests per month.

    1 newborn dies every 4 yearsin Calcutta Hospital.

    It would take more than

    2 years to see the same numberof dropped international calls.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    14/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Example of a Six Sigma Scale

    Say, Indian Railways runs 14,444 trains everyday.Passengers expect the trains to be on time. For the trains to

    be time everyday the number of opportunities are:

    14,444 x 365 = 5,272,060

    At Six Sigma level (3.4 defects per million opportunities)Indian Railways will have to meet the standard:

    (5,272,060/100,000) x 3.4 = 18

    Therefore, no more than 18 trains can be late during annually

    for Indian Railways to meet Six Sigma standards.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    15/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Calculating on Sigma Scale

    At Yes Bank customers expect that they should get acomplete set of documents within 3 days of their

    submitting their application to open an account.

    Management considers that if a customer gets his/her

    documents after 3 days, it is a defect.

    At the main branch of the bank, a total of 5000 accounts

    were opened in the last three months. Data shows that in

    the case of 125 accounts the target was missed. What is

    the quality level?

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    16/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    T

    heSigmaScale

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    17/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Calculating on Sigma Scale

    The level of defects per million can be calculated as follows:DPMO = (125/5000) = 25000

    Sigma Calculator

    The level of defects corresponds to a sigma level of 3.46.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    18/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Up the Sigma Scale

    Sigma % Good % Bad DPMO

    1 30.9% 69.1% 691,462

    2 69.1% 30.9% 308,538

    3 93.3% 6.7% 66,8074 99.38% 0.62% 6,210

    5 99.977% 0.023% 233

    6 99.9997% 0.00034% 3.4

    World-class

    Minimum

    Acceptable

    Quality

    Level

    DPMO Si R l i hi

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    19/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    1,000,000

    100,000

    10,000

    1,000

    100

    10

    1

    2 3 4 5 6 7

    d

    p

    m

    o

    66807 *

    6210

    233

    3.4*

    DPMO to Sigma Relationship

    Sigma

    *6 Sigma is not twice as good as 3 Sigma, it is almost

    20,000 times better

    Sigma Ranges

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    20/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMAUpendra Kachru

    Sigma Ranges

    The y axis, representing DPMO is logarithmically scaled. As the

    sigma level is increased, the defects per million level decreaseexponentially. For example, moving from 3 Sigma to 4 Sigma DPMO

    drops from 67,000 to 6500, then to just over 200 at 5 Sigma.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    21/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Cost of Quality at Different Sigma Levels

    The cost of quality can be measured for any organization using

    established criteria and categories of cost. In the figure the y axisrepresents the cost of quality as a percentage of sale. For a 2 Sigma

    organization, nearly 50% of sales is spent on non-value adding

    activities.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    22/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Cost of Quality at Different Sigma Levels

    At 3 or 4 Sigma, where most organizations operate, it spends 15 to

    25% on quality related activities. Some of the costs are: qualitydepartments, customer complaint departments, returns, and warranty

    repairs etc. Rule of thumb: An error that costs Re.1 will require Rs. 10

    to detect in-house and Rs. 100 if the customer detects it.

    C t f Q lit t Diff t Si

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    23/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Cost of Quality at Different Sigma

    Levels

    As the organization moves to 5 Sigma, its quality

    costs drop to about 5%. And at Six Sigma it drops

    to 12 % and customer satisfaction increases.

    Th Si Si E l ti Ti li

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    24/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    The Six Sigma Evolutionary Timeline

    1736: French

    mathematicianAbraham de

    Moivre publishesan articleintroducing the

    normal curve.

    1896: Italian sociologist Vilfredo

    Alfredo Pareto introduces the 80/20rule and the Pareto distribution in

    Cours dEconomie Politique.

    1924: Walter A. Shewhart introduces

    the control chart and the distinction ofspecial vs. common cause variation as

    contributors to process problems.

    1941: Alex Osborn, head ofBBDO Advertising, fathers a

    widely-adopted set of rules forbrainstorming.

    1949: U. S. DOD issues Military

    Procedure MIL-P-1629, Proceduresfor Performing a Failure Mode Effects

    and Criticality Analysis.

    1960: Kaoru Ishikawa

    introduces his now famouscause-and-effect diagram.

    1818: Gauss uses the normal curve

    to explore the mathematics of erroranalysis for measurement, probabilityanalysis, and hypothesis testing.

    1970s: Dr. Noriaki Kanointroduces his two-dimensional

    quality model and the threetypes of quality.

    1986: Bill Smith, a senior

    engineer and scientist introducesthe concept of Six Sigma at

    Motorola

    1994: Larry Bossidy launches

    Six Sigma at Allied Signal.

    1995: Jack Welchlaunches Six Sigma at GE.

    1798: Eli Whitneyintroduces the concept

    of interchangeable partsand Go gauges.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    25/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Major Contributions to Six Sigma

    1. Create Constancy of Purpose for Improvement of Product and

    Service

    2. Adopt the New Philosophy

    3. Cease Dependence on Mass Inspection for Quality Control

    4. End the Practice of Awarding Business on Price Tag Alone

    5. Constantly and Forever Improve the System of Production and

    Service

    6. Institute More Thorough, Better Job-Related Training

    7. Institute Leadership

    Demings 14 Points

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    26/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    8. Drive Out Fear

    9. Break Down Barriers Between Departments

    10. Eliminate Slogans, Exhortations, and Targets of the Work Force

    11. Eliminate Work Standards on the Factory Floor

    12. Remove Barriers that Rob People of Pride of Workmanship

    13. Institute a Vigorous Program of Education and Self-Improvement

    14. Put Everybody in the Organization to Work to Accomplish the

    Transformation

    Major Contributions to Six Sigma

    Demings 14 Points (contd.)

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    27/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Phillip Crosby

    FOUR ABSOLUTES OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT

    Definition of Quality: Conformance toRequirements

    System: Prevention

    Performance Standard: Zero Defects

    Measurement: Cost of Quality

    Major Contributions to Six Sigma

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    28/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Crosbys 14 Steps

    1. Management Commitment

    2. Quality Improvement Team

    3. Quality Measurement

    4. Cost of Quality Evaluation5. Quality Awareness

    6. Corrective Action

    7. Zero Defects Planning

    8. Quality Education

    9. Zero Defects Day

    10. Goal Setting

    11. Error Cause Removal12. Recognition

    13. Quality Councils

    14. Do It All Over Again

    Major Contributions to Six Sigma

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    29/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Genichi Taguchi

    Four-time winner of the Deming Award

    Joined ECL in 1949 with the charge to improve efficiency of

    R & D activities. Cultivated the application of designedexperiments.

    Advocates a three-stage process design model:1. System Design

    2. Parameter Design

    3. Tolerance Design

    Quality Loss Function

    Signal-to-Noise Ratio

    Major Contributions to Six Sigma

    Major Contributions to Six Sigma

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    30/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Joseph Juran

    Major Contributions to Six Sigma

    Definition of Quality:Fitness for Use

    O h M j C ib i Si Si

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    31/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Other Major Contributions to Six Sigma

    M t l d Si Si

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    32/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Motorola and Six Sigma

    Motorola was greatly impacted by the quality improvements

    in foreign products. Under the leadership and support of BobGalvin, the companys zeal for quality improvement

    flourished.

    Stealing the best practices from the best companies (known

    as the bandit project) was Motorolas attempt at turningaround the pocket pager business in the early 1980s.

    Process Variation & Defect Rates

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    33/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    CenterProcess

    ReduceSpread

    Off-Target Too Much Variation

    CenteredOn-Target

    Process Variation & Defect Rates

    Bill Smith, leading the Motorola team, realized that there are

    two things that can occur as a result of variation:

    The process is "off-center." This means that the output from the

    process is missing the target.

    The process has too much spread. This means that there is a wide

    variance in the output from the process.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    34/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMAUpendra Kachru

    Process Capability

    As the objective was to understand customer

    requi rements and reduce process variation and defects,

    Bill Smith and other Motorola executives combined

    the concepts of process capability and

    product specifications

    to arrive at the Six Sigma Framework.

    Six Sigma - Process Capability and

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    35/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Six Sigma Process Capability and

    Product Specifications

    Six Sigma marries the concepts of process capability andproduct specifications.

    Process capability (Cp) is a technique to find out the measurable

    property of a process to a specification.

    Process capability index (Cpk) is the measure of process

    capability. It shows how closely a process is able to produce the

    output to its overall specifications.

    M t l d Si Si

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    36/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Motorola and Six Sigma 3 Sigma ( Process capability of 1 CPK ) - if the process

    (lorry) slightly varies then the scrap or damage will occur

    6 Sigma ( Process capability of 2 CPK ) - if the process

    (lorry) varies, there will be no scrap or damage

    Curbs= required

    process tolerances

    CPK of 2

    (6 sigma)

    CPK of 1

    (3 sigma)

    Example

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    37/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    ExampleFood served at a restaurant should be between 38C and 49C when it

    is delivered to the customer. The process used to keep the food at thecorrect temperature has a process standard deviation of 2C and the

    mean value for these temperature is 23. What is the process capability

    of the process?

    Given:

    USL (Upper Specification Limit) =49C LSL (Lower Specification Limit) =39C

    Standard Deviation =2C

    Mean = 23

    To Find:

    Process Capability & Process Capability Index

    Solution

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    38/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Solution

    Process Capability :

    Process Capability = (49 - 39) / (6 * 2)= 10 / 12

    = 0.833

    Process Capability Index :

    Solution 1

    (USL-mean/ 3*std.Dev) = (49 - 23) / (3 * 2)

    = 4.33

    Solution 2

    (mean-LSL/3*std.Dev) = (23 - 39) / (3 * 2)

    = 2.66

    Now, find the minimum value.

    Process Capability Index = min (Solution 1, Solution 2)= min (4.33 , 2.66)

    = 2.66

    M t l d Si Si

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    39/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Motorola and Six Sigma

    Cp and Cpkmeasurements were used to measure

    process performance. The calculation for capability was

    defects per million opportunities (DPMO).

    Traditionally, processes aimed for process capability of3 to 4 sigma (Cpk=1.0 to 1.33 or 93% to 99.3%

    acceptable).

    The customer received 6200 defective product permillion at best. The process was failing the customerexpectations

    Motorola and Six Sigma

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    40/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Motorola and Six Sigma

    4 Sigma Process Capability 99.38% Current Standard

    6 Sigma Process Capability 99.99966% World-Class

    Long-Term Yield

    3 Sigma Process Capability 93.32% Historical Standard

    The companys approach was based on a comparison of process

    performance and product specification, and aggressive efforts to drive

    down defects.

    Processes now aimed for 6 sigma (Cpk=2).The customer would receive 3.4 defective product per million.

    Motorola and Six Sigma

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    41/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Motorola and Six Sigma

    To ensure widespread acceptance, the challenge was to make their

    people understand that significant opportunities could be identified inthe DPMO formula, and customers ever changing expectations must

    be considered.

    It was also important to understand that a companywide mindset of

    continuous improvement was as important as targeting a specific

    quality level, such as 3.4 DPMO.

    In 1991 Motorola certified its first 'Black Belt' Six Sigma experts,

    which indicates the beginnings of the formalisation of the accredited

    training of Six Sigma methods.

    Motorola and Six Sigma

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    42/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Motorola and Six Sigma

    As a result of winning the Baldrige Award in 1988, Motorola was

    compelled to share its quality practices with others. AlliedSignal wasone of the first companies to adopt and use the methodology in 1991.

    IBM and other companies adopted the concepts of Six Sigma and

    shared the new methodology and philosophy with their suppliers,

    engineers and managers.

    There have been many modifications to the original measures. Some

    add an additional I emphasizing implementation of the identified

    solutions; or a trailing L to emphasize the need to leverage the

    results across the organization.

    Others Follow

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    43/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Others Follow

    In 1995, Larry Bossidy, AlliedSignals CEO,introduced the concept of Six Sigma to Jack

    Welch, CEO of General Electric. Welch took the

    methodology, made it a corporate requirement and

    firmly deployed it throughout his organization

    with great intensity and significant success. Hisresults are well documented, and the rest is history.

    Six Sigma Companies

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    44/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Some Six Sigma Indian Companies

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    45/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Some Six Sigma Indian Companies

    Historical Developments

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    46/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Historical Developments

    Six Sigma is

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    47/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Six-Sigma is a philosophy:

    ........Of breakthrough improvement

    Six Sigma is

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    48/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Six Sigma is

    Management mandated and directed improvement

    program focused on breakthroughsin financial

    performance and customer satisfaction

    A systematic project based method for process and

    product improvement

    A statistical measure indicating the number of standard

    deviations within customer expectations.

    A performance goal, representing 3.4 defects for every

    million opportunities to make one.

    Six Sigma is. . .

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    49/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Six Sigma is. . .

    A Greek symbol for measuring performance variation

    A approach using series of tools and methods used toimprove or design products, processes, and/or services.

    Uses Champions, Black Belts and Green Belts to facilitate

    change

    A disciplined, fact-based approach to managing a business

    and its processes.

    A metric for evaluating performance quality

    A standard of excellence

    Six-Sigma Quality

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    50/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    g Q y

    Ensuring that process variation is half the design tolerance (Cp =

    2.0) while allowing the mean to shift as much as 1.5 standarddeviations, resulting in at most 3.4 DPMO.

    Six Sigma & Other Approaches

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    51/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    Six Sigma & Other Approaches

    There are many approaches to excellence in addition to Six

    Sigma : Total Quality Management

    Kaizen

    Toyota Production System

    Total Productive Maintenance Theory of Constraints

    Lean Production

    Six Sigma has some overlap with all these approaches. It is

    particularly close to TQM and sometimes considered as aspecific approach of TQM.

    Six Sigma & TQM

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    52/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    S S g & Q

    In some aspects of quality improvement, TQM and Six Sigma share thesame philosophy of how to assist organizations to accomplish Total

    Quality. They both emphasize the importance of top-management

    support and leadership. Both approaches make it clear that continuous

    quality improvement is critical to long-term business success.

    However, why has the popularity of TQM waned while Six Sigma'spopularity continues to grow in the past decade?

    Six Sigma & TQM

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    53/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    g QThe differences between TQM and Six Sigma are summarized below:

    TQM Six Sigma

    A functional specialty within the

    organization.

    An infrastructure of dedicated change agents. Focuses on

    cross-functional value delivery streams rather than

    functional division of labour.

    Focuses on quality. Focuses on strategic goals and applies them to cost,

    schedule and other key business metrics.

    Motivated by quality idealism. Driven by tangible benefit far a major stockholder group

    (customers, shareholders, and employees).

    Loosely monitors progress toward goals. Ensures that the investment produces the expected return.

    People are engaged in routine duties

    (Planning, improvement, and control).

    Slack resources are created to change key business

    processes and the organization itself.

    Emphasizes problem solving. Emphasizes breakthrough rates of

    improvement.

    Focuses on standard performance, e.g.

    ISO 9000.

    Focuses on world class performance, e.g., 3.4 PPM error

    rate.

    Six Sigma & TQM

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    54/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    g QThe differences between TQM and Six Sigma are summarized below:

    TQM Six Sigma

    Quality is a permanent, full-time job. Career

    path is in the quality profession.

    Six Sigma job is temporary. Six Sigma is a

    stepping-stone; career path leads elsewhere.

    Provides a vast set of tools and techniques

    with no clear framework for using them

    effectively.

    Provides a selected subset of tools and techniques

    and a clearly defined framework for using them to

    achieve results (DMAIC).

    Goals are developed by quality department

    based on quality criteria and the assumption

    that what is good for quality is good for the

    organization.

    Goals flow down from customers and senior

    leadership's strategic objectives. Goals and metrics

    are reviewed at the enterprise level to assure that

    local sub-optimization does not occur.

    Developed by technical personnel. Developed by CEOs.

    Focuses on long-term results. Expected

    payoff is not well-defined.

    Six Sigma looks for a mix of short-term and long-

    term results, as dictated by business demands.

    Six Sigma & TQM

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    55/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    g QThe differences between TQM and Six Sigma are summarized below:

    TQM Six Sigma

    A functional specialty within the

    organization.

    An infrastructure of dedicated change agents. Focuses on

    cross-functional value delivery streams rather than

    functional division of labour.

    Focuses on quality. Focuses on strategic goals and applies them to cost,

    schedule and other key business metrics.

    Motivated by quality idealism. Driven by tangible benefit far a major stockholder group

    (customers, shareholders, and employees).

    Loosely monitors progress toward goals. Ensures that the investment produces the expected return.

    People are engaged in routine duties

    (Planning, improvement, and control).

    Slack resources are created to change key business

    processes and the organization itself.

    Emphasizes problem solving. Emphasizes breakthrough rates of

    improvement.

    Focuses on standard performance, e.g.

    ISO 9000.

    Focuses on world class performance, e.g., 3.4 PPM error

    rate.

    Six Sigma & TQM

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    56/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    g QThe differences between TQM and Six Sigma are summarized below:

    TQM Six Sigma

    Quality is a permanent, full-time job. Career

    path is in the quality profession.

    Six Sigma job is temporary. Six Sigma is a

    stepping-stone; career path leads elsewhere.

    Provides a vast set of tools and techniques

    with no clear framework for using them

    effectively.

    Provides a selected subset of tools and techniques

    and a clearly defined framework for using them to

    achieve results (DMAIC).

    Goals are developed by quality department

    based on quality criteria and the assumption

    that what is good for quality is good for the

    organization.

    Goals flow down from customers and senior

    leadership's strategic objectives. Goals and metrics

    are reviewed at the enterprise level to assure that

    local sub-optimization does not occur.

    Developed by technical personnel. Developed by CEOs.

    Focuses on long-term results. Expected

    payoff is not well-defined.

    Six Sigma looks for a mix of short-term and long-

    term results, as dictated by business demands.

    Six Sigma & TQM

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    57/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    g Q

    Key differences between TQM and Six Sigma can be summarized as:Project Focus and Duration: Six Sigma deployment revolves around Six Sigma

    projects that concentrate on one or more key areas: cost, schedule and quality.

    The duration is specified, normally three to six months time frame.

    Organizational Support and Infrastructure: The deployment is led by

    executive staff, who use Six Sigma to further strategic goals and objectives. It is

    championed by mid and upper level leaders and the project is led by a black belt

    Clear and Consistent Methodology: Standard methodology has been developed

    for Six Sigma projects, i.e. DMAIC.

    Top down Training: Deployment starts at the top with training of key

    management personnel.

    Summary

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    58/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    y

    The major differences in Six Sigma as compared to other

    approaches: Project based improvement approach

    Clear and direct linkage of projects to financial benefits

    Projects sponsored by Senior Management

    Careful selection of the best people to learn and implement Six

    Sigma

    Uses statistical tools to identify problems and find their solutions

    Comprehensive training in Six Sigma (statistical) tools.

  • 8/10/2019 Six Sigma 1 Intro

    59/59

    Upendra Kachru SIX SIGMA

    C l i c k t o e d i t c o m p a n y s l o g a n .