sistema universitario ana g. méndez school for ... 214 dlp 2008.pdf · b. ensayo: historia de la...

60
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez School for Professional Studies Florida Campuses Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Universidad del Turabo EDUC 214 Computers In Education Uso de la Computadora en la Educación © Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, 2008 Derechos Reservados. © Ana G. Méndez University System, 2008. All rights reserved

Upload: others

Post on 26-Oct-2019

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez School for Professional Studies

Florida Campuses Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo

EDUC 214

Computers In Education Uso de la Computadora en la Educación

© Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, 2008 Derechos Reservados.

© Ana G. Méndez University System, 2008. All rights reserved

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 2

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

TABLA DE CONTENIDO/TABLE OF CONTENTS

Página/Page

Prontuario .................................................................................................................................... 3

Study Guide ............................................................................................................................... 10

Workshop One .......................................................................................................................... 17

Taller Dos ................................................................................................................................... 22

Workshop Three ....................................................................................................................... 28

Taller Cuatro .............................................................................................................................. 31

Workshop Five/Taller Cinco .................................................................................................. 34

Anejo A/Appendix A ................................................................................................................ 37

Anejo B/Appendix B ................................................................................................................ 38

Anejo C/Appendix C ................................................................................................................ 40

Anejo D/Appendix D ................................................................................................................ 42

Anejo E/Appendix E ................................................................................................................. 45

Anejo F/Appendix F ................................................................................................................. 46

Anejo G/Appendix G ................................................................................................................ 47

Anejo H/Appendix H ................................................................................................................ 49

Anejo I/Appendix I .................................................................................................................... 51

Anejo J/Appendix J ................................................................................................................. 53

Anejo K/Appendix K ................................................................................................................ 54

Anejo L/Appendix L ................................................................................................................. 55

Anejo M/Appendix M ............................................................................................................... 56

Anejo N/Appendix N ................................................................................................................ 58

Anejo O/Appendix O ................................................................................................................ 59

Anejo P/Appendix P ................................................................................................................. 60

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 3

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

PRONTUARIO

Título del Curso: Uso de la Computadora en la Educación

Codificación: EDUC 214

Duración: Cinco Semanas

Prerrequisito: Ninguno

Descripción del Curso:

El curso EDUC 214, cubre el estudio de los orígenes, desarrollo, conceptos básicos,

descripción, manejo de implicaciones, rol y aplicaciones de la computadora desde una

perspectiva pedagógica. Las aplicaciones de las computadoras y su impacto en

nuestras vidas así como la utilización de material didáctico diseñado para la misma. Se

hace uso de la computadora, cuyo laboratorio es básico como práctica en el mismo

utilizando programas, procesador de palabras y otras aplicaciones de diferentes

programas educativos.

Objetivos Generales:

1. Desarrollar los conceptos básicos del uso y manejo de las aplicaciones de una

computadora a la sala de clases

2. Integrar las aplicaciones de la computadora como una herramienta

administrativa a los procesos de planificación diaria del facilitador

3. Demostrar actitud y aptitud favorable hacia las herramientas tecnológicas que se

adquieran en la escuela.

Texto Requerido:

Shelly, G. B., Cashman, T.J., & Vermaat, M. E.( 2000). Discovering Computers 2001-

Concepts for a Connected World. Course Technology.

Hirshbuhl, H. & Kelley, J. (2006). Annual Editions: Computers in Education (12 ed.).

McGraw-Hill/Dushkin

Referencias

Beekman,G. (1995). Computación & Informatica Hoy, Addison Wesley Iberoamericana.

Hofstetter, F.T. (2nd edition). Multimedia Literacy, New York: McGraw-Hill Co, Inc.

ISBN: 0139743871

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 4

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Roblyer M.D.,& Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching.

2nd Ed. Prentice Hall-ISBN: 0-13-974387-1

Shelly, G. B., Cashman, T.J., Vermaat, M. E. (1999). Discovering Computers 2000-

Concepts for a Connected World, 1ra. Ed., Course Technology.

Shelly, Gary B., & Cashman, T.J. (1998). Discovering Computers 98 – a Link to

the Future, 1ra. Ed., Course Technology

Evaluación

El estudiante será evaluado de acuerdo a los siguientes criterios:

Criterios Puntos

1. Asistencia 50

2. Participación en clase y en foro de discusión en Internet 50

3. Portafolio 100

Otros Criterios

Distribución por

taller

Puntos

Tal

ler

1

Tal

ler

2

Tal

ler

3

Tal

ler

4

Tal

ler

5

4. Asignaciones y tareas para entregar 280

a. Resumen de referencia electrónica ���� ���� ���� ���� 40

b. Ensayo: Historia de la computadora y

eventos históricos ����

50

c. Definición de computadora y

justificación de la efectividad de

integrar la computadora en una de

las materias educativas.

����

20

d. Ensayo sobre los beneficios y

ventajas del software.

����

50

e. Definición de software y ejemplo de

un software educativo y su

����

20

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 5

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Otros Criterios

Distribución por

taller

Puntos

Tal

ler

1

Tal

ler

2

Tal

ler

3

Tal

ler

4

Tal

ler

5

integración en por lo menos una de

las materias educativas.

f. Presentación sobre dispositivos de

entrada y salida para la población

con necesidades especiales.

����

50

g. Ensayo sobre las ventajas y

desventajas de la comunicación

usando la computadora.

����

50

5. Proyecto ���� 100

6. Presentación de proyecto ���� 100

7. Examen final ���� 100

Total 780

Escala de Evaluación

100-90 A 89-80 B 79-70 C 69-60 D 59-00 F

Los anejos incluidos en el módulo, incluye las matr ices de valoración para la

evaluación de cada tarea. Utilice estas para guiar la preparación de cada tarea. El

facilitador y el estudiante pueden modificar, añadi r y/o eliminar criterios.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 6

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Descripción de las Normas del Curso

1. Este curso sigue el programa “Discipline-Based Dual-Language Immersion

Model®” del Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, el mismo está diseñado para

promover el desarrollo de cada estudiante como un profesional bilingüe. Cada

taller será facilitado en inglés y español, utilizando el modelo 50/50. Esto

significa que cada taller deberá ser conducido enteramente en el lenguaje

especificado. Los lenguajes serán alternados en cada taller para asegurar que

el curso se ofrece 50% en inglés y 50% en español. Para mantener un balance,

el módulo debe especificar que se utilizarán ambos idiomas en el quinto taller,

dividiendo el tiempo y las actividades equitativamente entre ambos idiomas. Si

un estudiante tiene dificultad en hacer una pregunta en el idioma especificado,

bien puede escoger el idioma de preferencia para hacer la pregunta. Sin

embargo, el facilitador deberá contestar la misma en el idioma designado para

ese taller. Esto deberá ser una excepción a las reglas pues es importante que

los estudiantes utilicen el idioma designado. Esto no aplica a los cursos de

lenguaje que deben ser desarrollados en el idioma propio todo en inglés o todo

en español según aplique.

2. El curso es conducido en formato acelerado, eso requiere que los estudiantes se

preparen antes de cada taller de acuerdo al módulo. Cada taller requiere un

promedio de diez (10) horas de preparación y en ocasiones requiere más.

3. La asistencia a todos los talleres es obligatoria. El estudiante que se ausente al

taller deberá presentar una excusa razonable al facilitador. El facilitador

evaluará si la ausencia es justificada y decidirá como el estudiante repondrá el

trabajo perdido, de ser necesario. El facilitador decidirá uno de los siguientes:

permitirle al estudiante reponer el trabajo o asignarle trabajo adicional en

adición al trabajo a ser repuesto.

Toda tarea a ser completada antes del taller deberá ser entregada en la fecha

asignada. El facilitador ajustará la nota de las tareas repuestas.

4. Si un estudiante se ausenta a más de un taller el facilitador tendrá las siguientes

opciones:

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 7

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

a. Si es a dos talleres, el facilitador reducirá una nota por debajo basado en

la nota existente.

b. Si el estudiante se ausenta a tres talleres, el facilitador reducirá la nota a

dos por debajo de la nota existente.

5. La asistencia y participación en clase de actividades y presentaciones orales es

extremadamente importante pues no se pueden reponer. Si el estudiante provee

una excusa válida y verificable, el facilitador determinará una actividad

equivalente a evaluar que sustituya la misma. Esta actividad deberá incluir el

mismo contenido y componentes del lenguaje como la presentación oral o

actividad a ser repuesta.

6. En actividades de grupo el grupo será evaluado por su trabajo final. Sin

embargo, cada miembro de grupo deberá participar y cooperar para lograr un

trabajo de excelencia, pero recibirán una calificación individual.

7. Se espera que todo trabajo escrito sea de la autoría de cada estudiante y no

plagiado. Se debe entender que todo trabajo sometido esta citado

apropiadamente o parafraseado y citado dando atención al autor. Todo

estudiante debe ser el autor de su propio trabajo. Todo trabajo que sea plagiado,

copiado o presente trazos de otro será calificado con cero (vea la política de

honestidad académica).

8. Si el facilitador hace cambios al módulo o guía de estudio, deberá discutirlos y

entregar copia a los estudiantes por escrito al principio del primer taller.

9. El facilitador establecerá los medios para contactar a los estudiantes proveyendo

su correo electrónico, teléfonos, y el horario disponibles.

10. EL uso de celulares está prohibido durante las sesiones de clase; de haber una

necesidad, deberá permanecer en vibración o en silencio.

11. La visita de niños y familiares no registrados en el curso no está permitida en el

salón de clases.

12. Todo estudiante está sujeto a las políticas y normas de conducta y

comportamiento que rigen al SUAGM y el curso.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 8

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Nota: Si por alguna razón no puede acceder las dire cciones electrónicas

ofrecidas en el módulo, no se limite a ellas. Exis ten otros motores de búsqueda y

sitios Web que podrá utilizar para la búsqueda de l a información deseada. Entre

ellas están:

• www.google.com

• www.altavista.com

• www.ask.com

• www.excite.com

• www.pregunta.com

• www.findarticles.com

• www.telemundo.yahoo.com

• www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu

• www.eric.ed.gov/

• www.flelibrary.org/

El/la facilitador(a) puede realizar cambios a las d irecciones electrónicas y/o

añadir algunas de ser necesario.

Filosofía y Metodología Educativa

Este curso está basado en la teoría educativa del Constructivismo.

Constructivismo es una filosofía de aprendizaje fundamentada en la premisa, de que,

reflexionando a través de nuestras experiencias, podemos construir nuestro propio

conocimiento sobre el mundo en el que vivimos.

Cada uno de nosotros genera nuestras propias “reglas “y “métodos mentales”

que utilizamos para darle sentido a nuestras experiencias. Aprender, por lo tanto, es

simplemente el proceso de ajustar nuestros modelos mentales para poder acomodar

nuevas experiencias. Como facilitadores, nuestro enfoque es el mantener una

conexión entre los hechos y fomentar un nuevo entendimiento en los estudiantes.

También, intentamos adaptar nuestras estrategias de enseñanza a las respuestas de

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 9

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

nuestros estudiantes y motivar a los mismos a analizar, interpretar y predecir

información.

Existen varios principios para el constructivismo, entre los cuales están:

1. El aprendizaje es una búsqueda de significados. Por lo tanto, el aprendizaje debe

comenzar con situaciones en las cuales los estudiantes estén buscando

activamente construir un significado.

2. Significado requiere comprender todas las partes. Y, las partes deben entenderse

en el contexto del todo. Por lo tanto, el proceso de aprendizaje se enfoca en los

conceptos primarios, no en hechos aislados.

3. Para enseñar bien, debemos entender los modelos mentales que los estudiantes

utilizan para percibir el mundo y las presunciones que ellos hacen para apoyar

dichos modelos.

4. El propósito del aprendizaje, es para un individuo, el construir su propio significado,

no sólo memorizar las contestaciones “correctas” y repetir el significado de otra

persona. Como la educación es intrínsecamente interdisciplinaria, la única forma

válida para asegurar el aprendizaje es hacer del avalúo parte esencial de dicho

proceso, asegurando que el mismo provea a los estudiantes con la información

sobre la calidad de su aprendizaje.

5. La evaluación debe servir como una herramienta de auto-análisis.

6. Proveer herramientas y ambientes que ayuden a los estudiantes a interpretar las

múltiples perspectivas que existen en el mundo.

7. El aprendizaje debe ser controlado internamente y analizado por el estudiante.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 10

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

STUDY GUIDE

Course Title: Computers in Education

Code: EDUC 214

Time Length: Five weeks

Prerequisite: None

Description:

The course EDUC 214 covers the study of the origins, development, basic concepts,

description, and implications of usage, role, and computer applications from a

pedagogical perspective. The application of computers and their impact in our lives as

well as the usage of didactic materials designed by computers. Computers and

computer laboratory are used for basic practice by using different software, word

processor and other computer applications.

General Objectives:

1. Develop the basic concepts on the use and management of computer

applications in a classroom.

2. Integrate computer applications for administrative processes in the

facilitator’s/teacher’s daily planning.

3. Demonstrate favorable attitude and aptitude toward the technological tools

acquired by schools.

Required Textbook: (most recent edition)

Gary B. Shelly, Thomas J. Cashman, Misty E. Vermaat. Discovering Computers

2001- Concepts for a Connected World. Course Technology, 2000

Hirshbuhl, H. & Kelley, J. (2006). Annual Editions: Computers in Education (12 ed.).

McGraw-Hill/Dushkin

References

Beekman,G. (1995). Computación & Informatica Hoy, Addison Wesley Iberoamericana.

Hofstetter, F.T. (2nd edition). Multimedia Literacy, New York: McGraw-Hill Co, Inc.

ISBN: 0139743871

Shelly, Gary B., & Cashman, T.J. (1998). Discovering Computers 98 – a Link to

the Future, 1ra. Ed., Course Technology

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 11

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Evaluacion

The student will be assessed according to this criteria:

Criteria Points

1. Attendance 50

2. Participation in the classroom and Internet forum 50

3. Portfolio 100

Other Criteria

Distribution by

workshop

Points

Wor

ksho

p 1

Wor

ksho

p 2

Wor

ksho

p 3

Wor

ksho

p 4

Wor

ksho

p 5

4. Assignments 280

a. Summary of electronic reference ���� ���� ���� ���� 40

b. Essay: History of the computer and historical

events ����

50

c. Computer definition and the justification of how

effective is integrating computers to a subject

area.

����

20

d. Essay about benefits and advantages of the

software

����

50

e. Software definition and an example of an

educational software and its integration in the

curriculum

����

20

f. PowerPoint presentation about output and input

devices for the handicapped population. ����

50

g. Essay about the computer and communications

types. ����

50

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 12

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Other Criteria

Distribution by

workshop

Points

Wor

ksho

p 1

Wor

ksho

p 2

Wor

ksho

p 3

Wor

ksho

p 4

Wor

ksho

p 5

5. Project ���� 100

6. Project presentation ���� 100

7. Final Test ���� 100

Total 750

Scale

100-90 A 89-80 B 79-70 C 69-60 D 59-00 F

Appendix is included in the module, include evaluation rubrics for each task or

assignment. Use these to guide you as you prepare each assignment. The facilitator

and students may agree on modifying, adding, and/or eliminating criteria.

Description of course policies

1. This course follows the Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Discipline-Based

Dual-Language Immersion Model® designed to promote each student’s

development as a Dual Language Professional. Workshops will be facilitated in

English and Spanish, strictly using the 50/50 model. This means that each workshop

will be conducted entirely in the language specified. The language used in the

workshops will alternate to insure that 50% of the course will be conducted in

English and 50% in Spanish. To maintain this balance, the course module may

specify that both languages will be used during the fifth workshop, dividing that

workshop’s time and activities between the two languages. If students have difficulty

with asking a question in the target language in which the activity is being

conducted, students may choose to use their preferred language for that particular

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 13

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

question. However, the facilitator must answer in the language assigned for that

particular day. This should only be an exception as it is important for students to use

the assigned language. The 50/50 model does not apply to language courses where

the delivery of instruction must be conducted in the language taught (Spanish or

English only).

2. The course is conducted in an accelerated format and requires that students prepare

in advance for each workshop according to the course module. Each workshop

requires an average ten hours of preparation but could require more.

3. Attendance at all class sessions is mandatory. A student that is absent to a

workshop must present the facilitator a reasonable excuse. The facilitator will

evaluate if the absence is justified and decide how the student will make up the

missing work, if applicable. The facilitator will decide on the following: allow the

student to make up the work, or allow the student to make up the work and assign

extra work to compensate for the missing class time.

Assignments required prior to the workshop must be completed and turned in on the

assigned date. The facilitator may decide to adjust the grade given for late

assignments and make-up work.

4. If a student is absent to more than one workshop the facilitator will have the

following options:

a. If a student misses two workshops, the facilitator may lower one grade

based on the students existing grade.

b. If the student misses three workshops, the facilitator may lower two

grades based on the students existing grade.

5. Student attendance and participation in oral presentations and special class

activities are extremely important as it is not possible to assure that they can be

made up. If the student provides a valid and verifiable excuse, the facilitator may

determine a substitute evaluation activity if he/she understands that an equivalent

activity is possible. This activity must include the same content and language

components as the oral presentation or special activity that was missed.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 14

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

6. In cooperative activities the group will be assessed for their final work. However,

each member will have to collaborate to assure the success of the group and the

assessment will be done collectively as well as individually.

7. It is expected that all written work will be solely that of the student and should not be

plagiarized. That is, the student must be the author of all work submitted. All quoted

or paraphrased material must be properly cited, with credit given to its author or

publisher. It should be noted that plagiarized writings are easily detectable and

students should not risk losing credit for material that is clearly not their own (see

Academic Honesty Policy).

8. If the Facilitator makes changes to the study guide, such changes should be

discussed with and given to students in writing at the beginning of the first workshop.

9. The facilitator will establish a means of contacting students by providing an email

address, phone number, hours to be contacted and days.

10. The use of cellular phones is prohibited during sessions; if there is a need to have

one, it must be on vibrate or silent mode during class session.

11. Children or family members that are not registered in the course are not allowed to

the classrooms.

12. All students are subject to the policies regarding behavior in the university

community established by the institution and in this course.

Note: If for any reason you cannot access the URL’s presented in the module, do

not stop your investigation. There are many search engines and other links you

can use to search for information. These are some examples:

• www.google.com

• www.altavista.com

• www.ask.com

• www.excite.com

• www.pregunta.com

• www.findarticles.com

• www.telemundo.yahoo.com

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 15

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

• www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu

• www.eric.ed.gov/

• www.flelibrary.org/

The facilitator may make changes or add additional web resources if deemed

necessary.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 16

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Teaching Philosophy and Methodology

This course is grounded in the learning theory of Constructivism. Constructivism

is a philosophy of learning founded on the premise that, by reflecting on our

experiences, we construct our own understanding of the world in which we live.

Each of us generates our own “rules” and “mental models,” which we use to make

sense of our experiences. Learning, therefore, is simply the process of adjusting our

mental models to accommodate new experiences. As teachers, our focus is on making

connections between facts and fostering new understanding in students. We will also

attempt to tailor our teaching strategies to student responses and encourage students to

analyze, interpret and predict information.

There are several guiding principles of constructivism:

1. Learning is a search for meaning. Therefore, learning must start with the issues

around which students are actively trying to construct meaning.

2. Meaning requires understanding wholes as well as parts. And parts must be

understood in the context of wholes. Therefore, the learning process focuses on

primary concepts, not isolated facts.

3. In order to teach well, we must understand the mental models that students use to

perceive the world and the assumptions they make to support those models.

4. The purpose of learning is for an individual to construct his or her own meaning, not

just memorize the "right" answers and regurgitate someone else's meaning. Since

education is inherently interdisciplinary, the only valuable way to measure learning is

to make the assessment part of the learning process, ensuring it provides students

with information on the quality of their learning.

5. Evaluation should serve as a self-analysis tool.

6. Provide tools and environments that help learners interpret the multiple perspectives

of the world.

7. Learning should be internally controlled and mediated by the learner.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 17

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Workshop One

Specific Content Objectives

At the end of Workshop One, the student will:

1. Discuss the background and history of computers.

2. Identify basic concepts and computer parts and their functions.

3. Classify the parts of a computer.

4. Relate the parts of a computer

5. Distinguish the purpose of computer parts: communication, peripherals, among

others.

Language Objectives:

The student will:

1. Use the reading process effectively.

2. Write an expository essay using appropriate vocabulary, grammar and style after

researching information.

3. Express their ideas in spoken English effectively using electronic presentations.

Electronic Links (URLs):

The History of Computers

http://inventors.about.com/library/blcoindex.htm

http://tdi.uregina.ca/~complit/comphist.htm

Basic & Advanced Computer Concepts

http://www.bedford.lib.nh.us/Basics.htm

Computer parts and functions

http://www.fayette.k12.il.us/99/Intro2Comp/parts.html

http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/ch490/lessons/lesson1_files/chap1.html

http://www.articlesender.com/Computers-Internet/Hardware-Tips/Parts--

Functions-of-a-Computer.htm

Components of a Computer System

http://old.ma.is/kenn/andy/Bradleycourse/Notes/chap01/ch01_3.html

http://agg3333.ifas.ufl.edu/components.htm

http://www2.krellinst.org/AiS/textbook/unit6/introcomp6.1.html

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 18

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Laptop and Desktop Computer System

http://www.circuitprotection.com/applications/laptop.asp?lcd=1

http://www.circuitprotection.com/applications/desktop.asp?lcd=1

Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education

http://www.aace.org/

Assignments before Workshop One:

1. Read the recommended URL’s, textbooks and other reference materials. Pay

close attention to the rubrics in the Appendix section. These rubrics will be used

to assess your knowledge.

Note: Assignments should be word processed, double space and stapled.

Do not use a folder, instead create a title page. Appendix A displays an

example of a title page. Use APA format for essays at all times.

2. Access the following URL and present a written brief description.

http://www.tekxam.com/StudyGuide/concepts/General-

Concepts/Computer_Components.html

3. Read about computers and their historical background. Select the historical

events that were vital. Write an essay about the computer history and its

historical events.

4. Define the term computer and justify the effectiveness of integrating computers to

a subject area (select a subject area: Math, Science, History, and English). Write

your justification on the area you selected.

5. Final Project to present in Workshop Five. See A ppendix F for directions.

Activities :

1. The facilitator and the students will introduced themselves by engaging in an

icebreaking activity suggested by the facilitator.

2. Students should submit their essays and summaries at the beginning of the

workshop.

3. Introduction of the course:

a. Make sure that students are registered in the course and received the

course module.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 19

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

b. Election of the student representative.

c. Discussion of the course rules.

d. Presentation of the course objectives, teaching strategies or methods, and

evaluation criteria.

4. Play video “Education today and tomorrow”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fnh9q_cQcUE

5. The facilitator will ask the students to group by assigned numbers. Once the

groups are formed, each group will be assigned a topic.

a. Group #1 - Advantages of understanding the functions of a computer

based on the content of the video and how important is it to be updated or

have knowledge about the continuous development of computers and

their applications?

b. Group #2 - List and define computer categories and how are computers

used? Explain.

c. Group #3 - Different types of memory. Definition and functions of a

Motherboard: CPU, ALU, system watch?

d. Group #4 - Definition and functions of Central Processing Unit and

Expansion Slots

e. Group #5 - Definition and functions of Communication Ports and

Peripherals

6. Once the topic is assigned, each group will search for the information and

prepare an oral report that presents the definitions, the relationship with other

parts, applications and its evolution. The group will have 15 minutes to present

the findings.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 20

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

7. Describe the evolution and computer history populating the following table.

Conduct a search on the topic or refer to the URL’s provided in page 17 of this

module to complete this exercise.

First

Generation

Second

Generation

Third

Generation

Fourth

Generation

Fifth

Generation

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 21

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

8. The facilitator may create and explain how to access a discussion board area for

the students in Blackboard. The purpose of establishing this area is to create

synchronous and asynchronous communication on issues related to the class.

Also the facilitator will track the students’ participation in the message board.

9. The instructor will discuss next workshop assignments.

Assessment:

1. Immediate critical reaction in English (5 min).

a. How does the computer impact the teaching-learning process?

2. Provide enough time for students to complete their reflective journals in English

(See Appendix B).

3. Students should insert both written documents in their portfolios (See Appendix

C).

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 22

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Taller Dos

Objetivos Específicos:

Al finalizar la secuencia instruccional de actividades, el estudiante estará capacitado para:

1. Identificar la función del software.

2. Señalar el propósito y la evolución de un software.

3. Identificar las categorías principales de los sistemas operativos.

4. Reconocer la función de los sistemas operativos.

Objetivos del Lenguaje:

1. El estudiante resumirá las ideas principales usando adecuadamente la gramática

y la ortografía después de leer una amplia variedad de recursos impresos.

2. El estudiante utilizará estrategias efectivas para llevar a cabo discusiones

formales e informales incluyendo actividades de reflexión y análisis, respetando

los diversos puntos de vista de otros.

3. El estudiante escribirá un ensayo expositivo usando gramática, vocabulario y

estilo adecuados después de analizar e interpretar la información.

Enlaces Electrónicos:

Función del software

http://www.cosaslibres.com/software.html

http://www.geocities.com/sfraul2003/definicion.html

http://canalhanoi.iespana.es/informatica/software.htm

Sistema Operativo

http://www.masadelante.com/faq-sistema-operativo.htm

http://es.kioskea.net/contents/systemes/sysintro.php3

Computadoras en la educación

http://terry-freedman.org.uk/artman/publish/Computers_in_Classrooms.php

http://www.intel.com/education/

http://computersforlearning.gov/

Software educativo

http://www.kidware.com/mobius/17gropsspa.htm

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 23

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

http://www.pergaminovirtual.com.ar/categorias/Internet_y_Computacion_Softwar

e_Educativo.shtml

Asignaciones antes del Taller:

1. Busca información y escribe un ensayo contestando la siguiente pregunta: ¿Qué

ventajas o beneficios, si alguno, proveen los programas de Word, Excel y

PowerPoint a las tareas administrativas y educativas?

2. Localiza la siguiente dirección electrónica y describa cada uno de los sistemas

operativos mencionados en la tabla.

http://www.tau.org.ar/base/lara.pue.udlap.mx/sistoper/

Sistema

Operativo

Descripción

DOS

Windows 3x

Windows 95/98

Windows 2000

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 24

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Sistema

Operativo

Descripción

Windows Vista

Windows NT

MAC

Unix

Linux

3. Busca la definición del término software e identifica un ejemplo de un software

educativo y cómo podría integrarse en el currículo. Selecciona una materia

(lenguaje, matemáticas, ciencias, etc.) y el nivel de enseñanza.

4. Continúe trabajando con su portafolio (ver Anejos I al O).

Actividades:

1. Discusión de la asignación tres.

2. El facilitador guiará una discusión acerca del software y sus diferentes tipos.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 25

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

3. Desde la perspectiva de herramientas educativas y que fortalecen la experiencia

de aprendizaje, describa con al menos cinco palabras la función de Internet,

Software y Tutorial.

Software Tutorial

1. 1.

2. 2.

3. 3.

4. 4.

5. 5.

4. Los estudiantes presentarán la relación y diferencias entre Tutoriales y Software.

5. Para esta actividad los estudiantes trabajarán en dos grupos. Un grupo discutirá

la información relacionada con el software y el otro acerca del tutorial.

6. Los estudiantes realizarán una búsqueda en Internet acerca de los tipos de

tutoriales. Seleccionarán un ejemplo y presentarán y discutirán la información

con sus compañeros.

6. Localice en la Internet los siguientes recursos educativos y/o referencias

educacionales:

URL Descripción

http://www.nationalgeographic.com

http://www.loc.gov

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 26

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

URL Descripción

http://www.travlang.com/languages

http://www.cbc4kids.ca/

http://www.wvpubcast.org/

7. Laboratorio:

Localice el programado de Word, Transcriba los datos que corresponden al

ejercicio de Matricula y ponga en función los siguientes comandos:

a. Doble espacio

b. Letra: Arial 12

c. Márgenes a 1 pulgada

d. Justificado

e. Título en Bold

f. Transcriba el contenido en dos párrafos

g. Integre tablas

h. Desarrolle el texto en al menos dos párrafos

i. Una vez ejecute los comandos transcriba el siguiente contenido:

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 27

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Ejercicio de Matricula

Estamos ubicados en la Calle Redondo #77 Urb. Cuadrado. La escuela sirve a

una matricula de 407 estudiantes de kindergarten a Sexto grado en una

organización sencilla de primero a sexto grado y una doble para kindergarten.

Inmersos en esta matricula tenemos a 17 estudiantes de educación especial

en el salón contenido y 54 estudiantes PEA. El desglose de la matricula

consiste de kindergarten 27 masculinos y 21 femeninos para un total de 48.

Primer grado tiene 30 masculinos y femeninos 24 = 54. Segundo grado 27

masculinos y femeninos 21 = 48. Tercer grado 28 masculinos y femeninos 26 =

54. Cuarto grado con 29 masculinos y femeninos 26 = 55. Quinto grado con 35

masculinos y femeninos 26 = 61. Sexto grado con 40 masculinos y femeninos

30=70. Educación Especial con 14 masculinos y 3 femeninos =17.

8. El facilitador discutirá los trabajos que son para entregar el próximo taller.

Avalúo

1. Reacción Inmediata en español (5 minutos). El estudiante deberá reflexionar

sobre estas preguntas:

a. ¿Qué fue lo más retante e interesante en el taller de hoy?

2. El tiempo para completar el Diario Reflexivo es de 5 minutos (en español) (Vea

el Anejo B). Ambos documentos deberán colocarse en su portafolio.

3. Matriz valorativa de trabajos escritos (ver Anejo C).

4. Matriz valorativa de participación en clase (ver Anejo G).

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 28

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Workshop Three

Specific Objectives:

At the end of the instructional sequence, the learner will be able to:

1. Research assistive technology for the handicapped population.

2. Define and identify the computer hardware.

3. Identify ports from a computer

4. Recognize the input and output devices in a computer system.

5. Recognize differences between different storage systems.

6. Use PowerPoint to create educational materials beside an electronic

presentation.

Language Objectives:

The student will:

1. Summarize the main ideas using correct grammar and spelling in English

after reading a selection.

2. Use cooperative learning strategies to analyze and discuss a topic.

3. Develop ideas to solve problems in an effective way.

4. Write a reflective journal using appropriate vocabulary, grammar, and style.

Electronic Links (URLs):

Computers and Special Education

http://www.atarimagazines.com/creative/v10n10/96_Computers_make_special_ed.php

http://www.ericdigests.org/pre-927/software.htm

http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Educational/Special_Education/

http://www.bedu.com/Newsletterarticle/SpecialEd.html

http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/Us_Eu/conf/csun_97/csun97_116.html

Computer hardware

http://www.coolnerds.com/Newbies/Hardware/hardware.htm

http://www.ehow.com/information_1013-computer-hardware.html

Computer ports

http://www.tech-faq.com/computer-port.shtml

http://www.directron.com/ports.html

http://www.helium.com/items/449619-computer-ports-explained

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 29

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Storage systems

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_storage

http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/searchNetworking/Downloads/IncidentResponseChapte

r10.pdf

http://www.technewsworld.com/story/59980.html?wlc=1227110328

http://www.technewsworld.com/story/59839.html

Input and output devices

http://cil.usu.edu/htm/cs/iodevices

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/288883/inputoutput-device

http://old.ma.is/kenn/andy/Bradleycourse/Notes/chap01/ch01_7.html

Assignments before Workshop Three:

1. Conduct a research about input and output devices specifically to assist the

handicapped population. Choose one device and prepare a PowerPoint

presentation explaining how this device can help a handicapped student to

accomplish the learning objective. At least provide with a minimum of five

benefits.

2. Access the following URL and present a written brief description.

http://www.huascaran.gob.pe/estudiantes/educacion_especial/articulo4.htm

3. Watch the following video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxIKsD0_X8c&feature=related Write a brief

description of the technology mentioned and their uses.

4. Continue working with your portfolio.

Activities :

1. The facilitator will start the class with a short review.

2. Students presentation of assignment one.

3. The facilitator will guide a discussion about hardware, input and output devices,

and methods and media used for data storage.

4. The facilitator will use the Jeopardy game prepared in PowerPoint to review the

concepts. For this activity the students will work in two groups. Before conducting

the activity explain the game rules and practice with an example.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 30

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

5. Students will discuss the description they made about the assistive technology

video.

6. Lab: The students will create, with the facilitator guidance, a memory game with

PowerPoint. See Appendix D for instructions.

7. The facilitator will discuss the assignments for the next workshop.

Assessment:

1. Immediate critical reaction in English (5 min).

a. How does the computer impact the teaching-learning process?

2. Provide enough time for students to complete their reflective journals in English

(See Appendix B).

3. Students should insert both documents in their portfolios.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 31

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Taller Cuatro

Objetivos Específicos:

Al finalizar la secuencia instruccional de actividades, el aprendiz adulto estará

capacitado para:

1. Definir el término Internet.

2. Identificar los elementos que dan acceso al Internet.

3. Experimentar con los componentes de conexión de un navegador.

4. Desarrollar y fortalecer las destrezas básicas de navegación.

5. Aplicar el proceso de búsqueda de información en la Internet.

4. Definir los componentes requeridos para una comunicación efectiva

5. Diferenciar entre un LAN y un WAN

6. Reconocer las funciones de las bases de datos.

Objetivos del Lenguaje:

1. El estudiante resumirá las ideas principales usando adecuadamente la gramática

y la ortografía después de leer una amplia variedad de recursos impresos.

2. El estudiante utilizará estrategias efectivas para llevar a cabo discusiones

formales e informales incluyendo actividades de reflexión y análisis, respetando

los diversos puntos de vista de otros.

3. El estudiante escribirá un ensayo expositivo usando gramática, vocabulario y

estilo adecuados después de analizar e interpretar la información.

Enlaces Electrónicos:

Internet

http://www.aulaclic.es/internet/f_internet.htm

http://www.masadelante.com/faq-internet.htm

http://www.angelfire.com/ak5/internet0/

http://definicion.de/internet/

El navegador o browser

http://www.enplenitud.com/nota.asp?articuloID=8121

https://ws003.juntadeandalucia.es/pls/intersas/servicios.configura_navegador

http://www.ordenadores-y-portatiles.com/navegador-web.html

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 32

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

¿Cómo navegar en la Internet?

http://www.prteducativo.com/ninos/comonavegar.htm

http://pedagogie.ac-toulouse.fr/espagnol/htm/tecnica/util_int.htm

http://www.aarp.org/espanol/dinero/search_engine_es.html

Comunicación y Redes

http://www.argo.es/medios/ponencia.html

http://uva.anahuac.mx/content/site/contenido/0a11_notas_03.htm

http://www.slideshare.net/latino/la-computadora-y-la-comunicacin-presentation/

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Olympus/7428/red1.html

http://html.rincondelvago.com/red-de-computadoras.html

Excel Formulas

http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/gradebook/appendix.html#letter

Asignaciones antes del Taller:

1. Busca información sobre la comunicación y sus tipos usando la computadora.

Escribe un ensayo comparando ventajas y desventajas de ésta.

2. Localiza la siguiente dirección electrónica y escribe un resumen del contenido.

http://www.learnthenet.com

3. Defina redes y establezca la diferencia entre LAN y WAN.

4. Continúe trabajando con su portafolio.

Actividades:

1. El facilitador comenzará la clase con un breve repaso.

2. Discusión de asignación uno.

3. El facilitador presentará el tema de las redes de computadora.

4. Los estudiantes trabajarán la siguiente actividad en grupos asignados por el

facilitador. El facilitador asignará a cada grupo diferentes tipos de red. Los

estudiantes utilizarán sus asignaciones y búsqueda adicional para presentar el

concepto en la clase creando un mapa conceptual.

5. En los mismos grupos los estudiantes buscarán información sobre base de datos

y participarán en discusión guiada por el facilitador.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 33

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

6. Laboratorio: El facilitador guiará al estudiante a crear un registro de notas en

Excel. Incluyendo las fórmulas para sacar promedio. El estudiante va a seguir

las instrucciones en el Anejo G para preparar el ejercicio. El instructor debe guiar

al estudiante en los pasos para sacar promedio y aplicarlo al programa de Excel

con las respectivas fórmulas.

7. El facilitador discutirá las asignaciones antes del próximo taller.

Avalúo

1. Reacción Inmediata en español (5 minutos). El estudiante deberá reflexionar

sobre estas preguntas:

a. ¿Qué fue lo más retante e interesante en el taller de hoy?

2. El tiempo para completar el Diario Reflexivo es de 5 minutos (en español) (Vea

el Anejo H). Ambos documentos deberán colocarse en su portafolio.

3. Matriz valorativa de trabajos escritos.

4. Matriz valorativa de participación en clase.

5. Matriz valorativa de presentaciones orales.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 34

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Workshop Five/Taller Cinco

NOTA: Este taller es bilingüe. Tanto,

el Facilitador como los estudiantes,

deberán utilizar el idioma asignado

para cada tarea y actividad.

NOTE: This is a bilingual workshop.

Both the facilitator and student

should use the language assigned

for each homework and activity.

Specific Objectives:

1. Submit the portfolio with assignments completed during this course.

2. Demonstrate the proper use of computers in the implementation of a lesson.

Language Objectives:

1. The student will use effective strategies to develop formal and informal

discussions, including analysis and reflection activities, considering others’ points

of view.

2. The student will develop ideas to solve problems effectively.

3. The student will write a reflective essay, using proper grammar, vocabulary, and

style.

Assignments before Workshop Five:

1. Continue working on the project and PowerPoint presentation.

2. Study for the final test.

3. Complete your portfolio to be submitted during workshop #5 (see Appendixes I -

O).

a.) In the portfolio, you should include the following:

i. Immediate written responses (in English and Spanish)

ii. Reflective diaries annotated by your facilitator (in English and

Spanish)

iii. Comparative table

iv. Outlines, drafts (in English and Spanish)

v. Others (in English and Spanish)

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 35

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Activities :

1. The facilitator will start the class with a short review (in Spanish).

2. The facilitator will present Workshop Five objectives to the class (in Spanish).

3. Ask participants to submit the assignments required in Workshop Five.

4. Prepare the classroom and students to take the test (in Spanish).

5. Prepare the classroom and participants to conduct the presentations (in English).

6. Provide some free time to complete the end of course evaluation (in English).

7. Students will hand in the Portfolio (English and Spanish).

8. Closing activity – to be determined by the facilitator.

Assessment:

1. The student will complete the final test (in Spanish).

2. The student will present the final project (in English) – see Appendix H.

3. The students will submit their completed portfolios for final evaluation (see

Appendixes I to O).

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 36

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejos/Appendixes

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 37

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo A/Appendix A Title Page/Página de Título

Title Using Capital and Lowercase Letter

by Juan Rivera

A Description of the Requisite For Example: A Research Project Submitted to the Ana G.

Mendez University System in Partial Fullfillment of the Requirements for EDU C 214

Florida Campuses (Date)

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 38

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo B/Appendix B Reflective Journals/Diarios Reflexivos

Reflection Complete the sentences and place it in the portfolio. Name: ______________________________ Date: _______ ______________

1. During Workshop ____ I felt…

2. How would you apply what you have learned? Comments: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 39

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Reflección Completa las oraciones y coloque en su portafolio. Nombre: _____________________________ Fecha: ____________________

1. Durante el taller ____ me sentí…

2. Hasta hoy he logrado… Comentarios: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 40

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo C/Appendix C

RUBRIC TO EVALUATE WRITTEN WORK

Student Name: ______________________ Date: _______________

Criteria Value Points Student Score

Content

The paper is clear, focused and interesting. Identifies purpose, objectives and principal ideas included in the paper

10

Presentation of ideas is organized, coherent and can be easily followed

10

The paper properly explains content.

10

The presentation of ideas and arguments are based in sources presented, consulted or discussed in class.

10

The paper demonstrates substance, logic and originality.

10

The author presents his point of view in a clear, convincing and well based manner.

10

Contains well-constructed sentences and paragraphs that facilitate lecture and comprehension.

10

Language Demonstrate a command of standard English (vocabulary used, syntax and flow of ideas).

10

Uses grammar appropriately and correctly.

10

Manages and uses verbs appropriately and correctly.

10

Total Points 100 (70% content and 30% language)

Student’s total Score: _______

Student’s Signature: ____________________Facilitator’s Signature:___________________

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 41

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

MATRIZ VALORATIVA PARA TRABAJOS ESCRITOS

Nombre del Estudiante: ______________________ Fecha: _______________

Criteri o Puntos Puntuación

Contenido

Este trabajo esta claro, enfocado e interesante. Identifica el propósito, objetivos e ideas principales del documento o actividad.

10

La presentación de ideas es coherente y puede ser seguida fácilmente.

10

El documento explica propiamente el contenido.

10

La presentación de ideas y argumentos esta basada en recursos presentados, consultados o discutidos en clase.

10

El documento demuestra substancia, lógica y originalidad.

10

El autor presenta su punto de vista en una manera clara, convincente y bien estructurada.

10

Contiene oraciones bien estructuradas y párrafos que facilitan la lectura y comprensión del documento.

10

Lengua je Demuestra un conocimiento del español (vocabulario, sintaxis y flujo de ideas).

10

Usa gramática apropiada y correctamente.

10

Maneja verbos y acentuación apropiada y correctamente.

10

Total P untos 100 (70% conten ido y 30% lenguaje)

Puntuación T otal : _______

Student’s Signature: ____________________Facilitator’s Signature:___________________

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 42

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo D/Appendix D PowerPoint Exercise/Workshop Three

Objective: To use power point to develop an educati onal activity to use in the classroom.

Create a Memory game using PowerPoint Topic Steps Screen Image Blank Slide 1. Select the “Blank” slide on the

test layouts panel on the right side.

Image A

Image B

Drawing Shapes

2. Draw four rectangles, simulating a poker card.

a.) Select “Insert” b.) Click on “Picture” c.) Click on ‘Auto shapes” d.) Select “Basic shapes”

Image C

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 43

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Changing Shapes Colors

3. Change the cards color to a different color.

a.) Click on the shape b.) Click on the “fill color” c.) Select “More colors” for

more variety. d.) Select the “Standard”

tab. e.) Click on the desire color

and then select “OK”. f.) Repeat steps A - E for

each shape.

Image D

Image E

Creating a Text Box

4. Select the “textbox” tool and create a text box for each card and place it over each one.

a.) Number each cards (1-4).

5. Make each textbox’s background transparent and invisible lines.

Image F

Creating a background

6. Select “format” then” background” 7. Click on the arrow and choose a

background color. 8. Click “Apply to all”.

Image G

Creating new slides

9. Add 10-new slides. 10. Repeat steps 1 - 2 for each slide.

11. In slide 2 insert the image of an apple in the first card.

a.) Continue the same step following the drawing below.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 44

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

1 2

3 4

Slide 1

3

Slide 3

Apple

Pear

Slide 4

2

3

Apple

Pear

4

Slide 9

1

Pear

2

2

3 4

Slide 2

Apple

Slide 10

1

Pear

2

Pear

Slide 11

1 2

Pear 3

3 4

Apple Apple

Slide 5

3 4

Apple

Slide 6

1

4

Apple

Slide 7

1

Pear 3

Apple

Slide 8

1

Pear

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 45

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo E/Appendix E

Ejercicio de registro de notas en Excel

Use la siguiente información para crear un registro de notas con el programa MS Excel. Usted es maestro(o) de matemáticas para un grupo de tercer grado. Los estudiante serán evaluados con 10 notas. Una no ta por asistencia, una nota es combinando los puntos de 5 pruebas cortas, una n ota por el cuaderno de trabajo, seis notas de exámenes parcial, y el exame n final.

El grupo se compone de 25 estudiantes :

a. Minerva Ocasio b. Jose Centeno c. Cesar Ruiz d. Carolina Irizarry e. Dwight Howard f. Tyler McDowell g. Daniel Rivera h. Christopher Fernandez i. Jason Goodman j. Amelia Cruz k. Xiomara Martinez l. Mia Hall m. Danielle Harris

n. Rebeca Reynolds o. Brian Solano p. Terrie Acevedo q. Cristina Maldonado r. Gabriela Soto s. Omar Figueroa t. Jim Butler u. Janis Rudolph v. Carole Smith w. Kara Campbell x. Marla Owen y. Joe Cook

1. Todos los nombres deben ser escritos en la columna A. 2. Organice los nombres en orden alfabético. 3. Asigne títulos a cada columna.

a. Títulos en la columna B a la K deben de ser los nombres de los exámenes y actividades.

4. Totalice las notas siguiendo el método de curva que se utilice en educación.

a. La columna L debe tener la nota en puntos. b. La columna M debe tener la nota en letra.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 46

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo F/Appendix F Final project

The school principal selected you to design, develop and conduct training to the school

faculty. The training consists on the computer use and integration in the subject areas.

Steps:

1. Select the subject area (language, math, science, etc.)

2. Select the grade level.

3. Select the concept.

4. Remember the objective of this project/training is to prepare faculty how to

integrate the computers in the classroom using subject area, level concepts, and

activities as examples.

5. The written project should have:

a. Title page

b. Title of the concept

c. Population to be addressed by the lesson

d. Lesson goal(s)

e. Activities - clear and specific

f. Assessment

g. URL’s

6. Prepare a PowerPoint with a minimum of 5 slides to present the training idea to

the class.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 47

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo G/Appendix G

MATRIZ VALORATIVA PARA PARTICIPACIÓN EN GRUPO

Nombre del Estudiante: _____________________ Fecha: _______________

Grupo: ________ Nombre del estudiante evaluador: _____________________

Criteri o Puntos Puntuación del estudiante

Asistió a las reuniones o actividades del grupo.

10

Colaboró en la planificación y organización de las reuniones o actividades de grupo.

10

Demostró disposición para cooperar con el grupo.

10

Contribuyó frecuentemente a las discusiones del grupo

10

Participó activamente en las reuniones y actividades.

10

Demostró interés en las discusiones y actividades del grupo.

10

Vino preparado(a) a las reuniones, actividades y discusiones del grupo.

10

Demostró atención y apertura a los puntos y argumentos de sus compañeros.

10

Contribuyó al grupo con material e información adicional.

10

Contribuyó significativamente al trabajo que presentó el grupo.

10

Totals 100

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 48

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

RUBRIC TO EVALUATE PARTICIPATION IN GROUP ACTIVITIE S

Students name: _________________________ Date: _______________

Group: ________ Name of evaluating student: ______________________

Criteri a Points Students Points

Attended all the meetings and activities of the group.

10

Collaborated with the planning and organization of activities of the group.

10

Demonstrated cooperation and team work with the group.

10

Contributed frequently with the discussions of the group.

10

Participated actively in the meetings and activities.

10

Demonstrated interest in the discussions and activities of the group.

10

Came prepared to meetings, activities and discussions of the group.

10

Demonstrated attention to the arguments within the group.

10

Contributed to the group with additional information.

10

Contributed significantly with the work that presented the group.

10

Totals 100

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 49

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo H/Appendix H

MATRIZ VALORATIVA PARA EVALUAR PRESENTACION INDIVID UAL/GRUPAL

ORAL

Nombre del estudiante: _______________________Fecha:_________________

Criteri o Puntos Puntuación del estudiante

Conten ido Realiza una introducción efectiva del tema identificando el propósito, objetivo e ideas principales que se incluyen en la presentación.

10

La presentación es organizada y coherente y puede seguirse con facilidad.

10

El presentador demuestra dominio del tema o materia de la presentación al explicar con propiedad el contenido y no incurrir en errores.

10

Las ideas y argumentos de la presentación están bien fundamentados en los recursos presentados, consultados o discutidos en clase.

10

Capta la atención e interés de la audiencia y/o promueve su participación, según aplique.

10

Proyección efectiva, postura corporal adecuada, manejo de la audiencia, manejo del tiempo asignado.

10

Usa varias estrategias para hablar o definir conceptos, interpretaciones, aplicaciones y evaluación de procesos o experiencias en el contenido del curso.

10

Lenguaje Pronunciación de las palabras es clara y de manera correcta para que se entienda el lenguaje utilizado.

10

Uso correcto de la gramática y conjugación de verbos en el idioma asignado.

10

Uso correcto del vocabulario para expresar el mensaje adecuadamente.

10

Total de Puntos 100 (70% de contenido y 30%

Lenguaje)

Puntuación del Estudiante:

________ Firma del Estudiante: _________________ Firma del Facilitador: ____________________

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 50

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

RUBRIC TO EVALUATE INDIVIDUAL/GROUP PRESENTATION

Student Name:____________________________Date:___________________

Criteria Value Points Student Total Score

Content Performs an effective introduction to the theme identifying the objectives, ideas and principles that are included in the presentation.

10

The presentation is organized and coherent, and could be easily followed

10

The presenter demonstrates domain of the theme or subject by means of properly explaining content without incurring in errors

10

The ideas and arguments of the presentation are well founded by the resources presented, consulted or discussed in class

10

Capture of the attention and interest of the audience and/or promote their participation, as applicable

10

Effective personal projection, corporal posture and manage of the audience;

10

Uses a variety of speaking strategies to define concepts, interpretation, application and evaluation of processes using experience on concepts or content of class.

10

Language Student pronounces words in a clear and correct manner so as to make the correct language used understood to others.

10

Correct use of grammar and verb conjugation.

10

Use of correct use of vocabulary words to express message.

10

Total Points 100 (70% of content and 30% of language)

Student’s Total Score: ________

Student’s signature: __________________Facilitator’s Signature: __________________

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 51

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo I/Appendix I

PORTFOLIO

Guidelines to prepare the portfolio

1. Determination of sources of content

2. The following, but not limited to, documentation will be included:

a. Projects, surveys, and reports.

b. Oral presentations

c. Essays: dated writing samples to show progress

d. Research papers: dated unedited and edited first drafts to show progress

e. Written pieces that illustrate critical thinking about readings: response or

reaction papers.

f. Class notes, interesting thoughts to remember, etc.

g. Learning journals, reflexive diaries.

h. Self assessments, peer assessments, facilitator assessments.

i. Notes from student-facilitator conferences.

3. Organization of documentation

Documentation will be organized by workshop, and by type of assignment within

workshops. Workshops will be separated from one another using construction paper

or paper of different colors, with tabs indicating the workshop number.

4. Presentation of the portfolio

• Documentation will be posted in a binder or in a digital version (e-portfolio).

• The cover page will follow exactly APA guidelines applied to a cover page of

research papers submitted at Metro Orlando Campus. This cover page will be

placed at the beginning of the portfolio (Appendix A).

• The entire portfolio will follow APA style: Courier or Times New Roman font,

size 12, double space, and 1-inch margins. See a “Publication Manual of the

APA, Fifth Edition”

• A log of entries that can be expanded with each new entry properly

numbered. The table, which should be located at the beginning, should

include a brief description, date produced, date submitted, and date evaluated

(Appendix K ).

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 52

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

• Introduction and conclusion of the income and outcome of the portfolio.

• A list of references and appendixes of all assignments included will be added

to the end of the portfolio.

• The Portfolio Informational Sheet will be placed in the transparent front pocket

of the binder for identification purposes (Appendix J ).

5. Student-Facilitator Feedback Template: Progression follow-up

The final step in implementing portfolios, before returning them to the student or

school life, is sharing feedback with each student to review the contents, student

reflections, and your evaluations of individual items and all of the work together as

related to learning targets (Banks, 2005).

Facilitators will e-mail a feedback template to all students. This template will contain

information pertaining to weaknesses and strengths found in students’ portfolios

(Appendix N ). Facilitators will focus their attention on showing students what is

possible and their progress rather than what is wrong; however, this does not mean

that facilitators will not cover weaknesses and areas for improvement during the

conference. Facilitators will send this feedback template upon completion of

workshop one.

Students will also have the opportunity to respond to the facilitator’s feedback and

write their own comments and/or ideas of how to improve the quality of their

portfolios, and how to become better metacognitive learners on the feedback

template. Students will e-mail the template with their comments back to the facilitator

after every workshop.

6. Portfolio storage:

• Portfolio samples will be safely stored for a six-month term on campus.

• Students will sign an official document empowering Ana G. Mendez

University System with rights to use their portfolios with educational or

accreditation purposes during this term (Appendix O ).

• After this term, and if their authors authorize Ana G. Mendez University

System to discard their portfolios by signing an official document, portfolio

samples will be destroyed; otherwise, they will be returned to their original

authors (Appendix P ).

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 53

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo J/Appendix J

PORTFOLIO INFORMATIONAL SHEET

Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Florida Campuses

Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo Check one: � Universidad del Este � Universidad Metropolitana � Universidad del Turabo Check one: � Undergraduate

� Graduate

Concentration

Student’s Name

Facilitator’s Name

Course:

Portfolio rated as

Reason of this rate

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 54

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo K/Appendix K

Log of Entries

Entry Description

Date of Entry

Date

Submitted

Date

Evaluated

Page #

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 55

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo L/Appendix L

Checklist for Portfolio Assessment

Has the student set academic goals?

Does the portfolio include enough entries in each area to make

valid judgments?

Does the portfolio include evidence of complex learning in realistic

setting?

Does the portfolio provide evidence of various types of student

learning?

Does the portfolio include students’ self-evaluations and

reflections on what was learned?

Does the portfolio enable one to determine learning progress and

current level of learning?

Does the portfolio provide clear evidence of learning to users of

the portfolio?

Does the portfolio provide for student participation and

responsibility?

Does the portfolio present entries in a well-organized and useful

manner?

Does the portfolio include assessments based on clearly stated

criteria of successful performance?

Does the portfolio provide for greater interaction between

instruction and assessment?

Adapted from: Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson

Education, Inc.

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 56

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo M/Appendix M

Portfolio Rubric

4 3 2 1

PORTFOLIO APPEARANCE

� Readable: Are entries typed in an appropriate font and size? Are

entries free of errors? Do ideas expressed in entries follow a logical sequence with appropriate transitions among paragraphs and topics?

� Professionalism: Is the appearance of the portfolio

professional? Are graphics, colors and portfolio language consistent with professional workplace expectations? Is the portfolio presented in a neat and orderly manner?

� Organization: Is the portfolio organized in a manner that makes

it easy to follow and easy to quickly locate information?

PORTFOLIO CONTENT AND FUNCTION

� Content: Are all required entries included in the portfolio? Are

entries relevant to the content of the portfolio? Do all entries contain the student’s reaction or reflection on the selected topics? Do entries provide thorough understanding of content? Resume, Activities List, Varied Samples of Written Work, Evidence of Problem Solving, and Evidence of Decision Making.

� Authenticity: Are the samples and illustrations a true reflection

of the student’s efforts and abilities?

� Growth/Development: Do samples provide thorough

understanding of growth and development related to their field of concentration? Do items show what the student has learned?

� Collaboration: Do items show examples of both individual and

group work? Does the student provide clear understanding of collaboration, and use collaboration to support his/her learning?

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 57

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

� Reflection and Personal growth: Do items show exceptional

understanding of how to be a reflective thinker and how to seek opportunities for professional growth? Does the student include self-reflective comments? Does the student reflect enthusiasm for learning?

� Professional Conduct: Do items show clear understanding of

ethical behavior and professional conduct? Do items display the pride the student has in his or her work?

Overall Portfolio Impact

� Is this portfolio an asset in demonstrating the student’s value

(skills, abilities, knowledge) to a potential employer or college representative?

Rating Scale 4 = Outstanding 3 = Very good 2 = Good 1 = Need s improvement Source: Retrieved from www.lcusd.net/lchs/portfolio/rubric.htm on February 10th, 2007. Adapted 02/10/2007 by Fidel R. Távara, M.Ed. Coordinator of Assessment and Placement – Metro Orlando Campus

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 58

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo N/Appendix N

Portfolio Assessment Feedback Template Strengths Weaknesses Improv ement Ideas Facilitator’s comments

Student’s response and comments

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 59

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo O/Appendix O

Use and Return of Portfolio

Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo

I, ____________________________________, grant permission to the office of

Assessment and Placement of the Ana G. Méndez University System, to keep in their

records a copy of my portfolio. I understand that the portfolio is going to be used for

accreditation or educational purposes only, and that is not going to be disclosed without

my consent.

By signing this document I authorize the office of Assessment and Placement to keep a

copy of my portfolio for six months and return it to me at the end of this period of time.

_______________________________ ___________

Student’s Name (print) Date

_______________________________ ___________

Student’s Signature Date

EDUC 214 Computers in Education 60

Prep. 2004. Noridis Medina Fernández Rev. 2004. Carmen L. Lamboy, Ed.D, Rev. 2008. Ariadna Rivera Crawford, MA.Ed

Anejo P/Appendix P

Use and Discard of Portfolio

Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, Un iversidad del Turabo

I, ____________________________________, grant permission to the office of

Assessment and Placement of the Ana G. Méndez University System to keep in their

records a copy of my portfolio. I understand that the portfolio is going to be used for

accreditation or educational purposes only, and that is not going to be disclosed without

my consent.

By signing this document I authorize the Office of Placement and Assessment to keep a

copy of my portfolio for six months and discard it at the end of this period of time.

_______________________________ ___________

Student’s Name (print) Date

_______________________________ ___________

Student’s Signature Date