silver lake reservoir complex master plan project

37
STAKEHOLDER WORKING GROUP MEETING #8 June 25, 2020 SILVER LAKE RESERVOIR COMPLEX MASTER PLAN PROJECT FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING GROUP PURPOSES ONLY

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

STAKEHOLDER WORKING GROUP MEETING #8June 25, 2020

SILVER LAKE RESERVOIR COMPLEX MASTER PLAN PROJECT

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

INTRODUCTIONSSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

3

introductionsSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

WELCOME HR&A ADVISORS!

Park Economics & Implementation Experts- Funding strategies- Business planning (O&M

budgeting and governance)

Planning

Design & Construction

Completed

Taylor Yard G2Chouteau Greenway

Seattle Waterfront The Bay, Sarasota

Brooklyn Bridge Park Stuyvesant Cove NYCFOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

4

Seattle WaterfrontSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8 Seattle, WA

Location

20Acres

City, State, Local Improvement District,

PhilanthropyCapital Sources

Philanthropy, Earned Income, City

Operating Sources

City-led with nonprofit fundraising &

programming partner, Oversight Committee

Governance

Pier 62/63, economic opportunities

Phase 1FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

5

Sarasota BayfrontSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

Sarasota, FLLocation

53Acres

Philanthropy, TIF, Development Impact

Fees, City, State/FederalCapital Sources

Earned Income, Philanthropy, Public

Support Operating Sources

Nonprofit-led/managed with City oversight

Governance

10-acre community park, site enhancements

Phase 1FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

6

Scissortail ParkSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

Oklahoma City, OKLocation

70Acres

MAPS3 penny sales taxCapital Sources

Public Support, Earned Income, Philanthropy

Operating Sources

Nonprofit-led/managed under agreement with

OKC Economic Development Trust,

City oversightGovernance

36-acre Upper ParkPhase 1

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

SCHEDULE UPDATESLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

8

master plan scheduleSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

WE

ARE

HER

E

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

9

master plan scheduleSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

VIRTUAL COMMUNITY WORKSHOP #5 / OUTREACH

SLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

11

virtual CW#5SLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

VIDEO FORMAT

PART 1 – Introduction (The Reservoirs) General overview and introduction to the reservoir site

PART 2 – The ProcessCommunity outreach process

PART 3 – The Vision The Master Plan Design

PART 4 – Realizing the Vision Sustainable Water, Economics, Near term action items

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

12

virtual CW#5SLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

FILMING (on site) – July 6 & 7

SWG (Tuesday, July 7 @ Meadow)9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m.Silver Lake Wildlife SanctuarySilver Lake Neighborhood Council

10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m.Silver Lake NOWSilver Lake Forward

11:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m.Silver Lake Reservoirs Conservancy

One SWG member per group – identify by Monday, June 29Questions coming

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

13

virtual CW#5SLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

ONLINE QUESTIONNAIRE TOPICS

Implementation Funding (support / oppose)Modest tax on nearby properties

Park Operations Entity (support / oppose)Private non-profit organization, partnership between private non-profit and public (e.g., City of LA) agency, public agency

Implementation Priorities (rank or pick top 3)Which elements or areas? Rank in order of preference?

Potential Partnerships (support / oppose)University environmental institutes such as UCLA La Kretz Center for California Conservation Science, UAUSD, LA Audubon Society…..

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

14

SLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

BANNER & E-MAIL BLAST

July 8

JUNE JULY AUGUST

VIDEO PRODUCTION

QUESTIONNAIRE

PROMO (Outreach)

virtual CW#5OUTREACH SCHEDULE

WE ARE HERE June 25

OPEN FROM JULY 22 – AUG 12

VIDEO ONLINE July 22

INTERVIEWSJuly 7 & 8

Printed Flyers?

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

15

outreach - project pamphletSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

10” x 6” (folded) 18” x 20” (opened)

01 & 02 are side-by side 03 & 04 are side-by side

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

16

SLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

Sample Layout6” x 10” (folded)

outreach - project pamphlet

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

17

project pamphletSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

Sample Layout6” x 10” (folded)

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

DRAFT MASTER PLAN REPORT

SLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

19

1. Executive Summary

2. Project Overview

3. Analysis

4. Process

5. Master Plan

6. Park Sustainability

7. Park Operations, Maintenance & Governance

8. Park Economics and O&M Funding Strategies

9. Appendices

draft master plan reportSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

20

City Reviewdraft master plan reportSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

Over 30 City Reviewers from multiple departments:• Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering• Department of Water and Power• Department of Public Works, Bureau of Sanitation• Department of Recreation and Parks• Department of City Planning• Department of City Planning, Office of Historic Resources• Los Angeles Department of Transportation• Office of the Mayor• Council District 4• Council District 13

Comments:• Received May 15• Generally positive and minimal• Design team coordinating with City departments to address comments

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

21

1.1 Master Plan Scope of Work

Chapter 1 – Executive SummarySLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

The Silver Lake Reservoir Complex was removed from the City’s drinking water supply system in 2008 and is being repurposed as a passive public park.

The Silver Lake Reservoir Complex Master Plan (herein referred to as the “Master Plan”) provides a bold vision for a new 116-acre park that will blend urban wilderness with community park amenities.

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

22

1.2 Design Team

Chapter 1 – Executive SummarySLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

Lead by Hargreaves Jones, an international landscape architecture and planning firm specializing in the design of park, the design team is comprised by local, multidisciplinary experts.

ARTSCIENCE

COMMUNITY

HARGREAVES JONESPrime / Landscape Architecture &

Planning

CWE ENGINEERINGWater Resources Civil Engineering

GPA CONSULTINGBiology& Environmental Clearance

Cultural Resources

CHEE SALETTELandscape Architecture

Architecture

THE ROBERT GROUPCommunity Engagement

BEYAZ & PATELGeotech / Structural

JB & ASSOCIATESTraffic Engineering

LELAND SAYLORCost Estimating

+ SUPPORT

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

23

1.3 Project Overview

Chapter 1 – Executive SummarySLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

The Master Plan initiative was undertaken to allow the Silver Lake community and City of Los Angeles to consider repurposing this major piece of urban infrastructure for public use. The Master Plan project originated March 29, 2018, when the City Council approved a Memorandum of Agreement between the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) and the LADWP where BOE began the SLRCMP processes funded by LADWP.

The agreement included LADWP continuing their operational responsibilities, such as the maintaining integrity of the dams and LADWP onsite facilities.

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

24

1.4 Vision & Goals

Chapter 1 – Executive SummarySLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

As wildlife habitat continues to disappear in our increasingly urbanized world, introducing wildlife habitat back into cities is becoming ever more important. Early in the community engagement process, enhancing and expanding habitat for wildlife was identified as a primary goal for the Master Plan. The Park is envisioned as a hybrid space that unleashes the power of natural processes and human connection.

The Design Team’s goals listed below guided the development of the Master Plan:

• Create a clear, bold design that repurposes the Silver Lake Reservoir Complex to a public park• Preserve and enhance the unique character of the Silver Lake Reservoir Complex• Create a public amenity with safe and varied access• Balance active and passive uses• Balance wildlife habitat with human uses • Create a design that is implementable and can be partially funded through grants• Allow for continued LADWP on-going operations and future use and access

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

25

Chapter 1 – Executive SummarySLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

A year-long community process included five large community workshops and eight focused meetings with the Stakeholder Working Group to garner public feedback at all critical stages in the planning process: analysis, visioning and programming, Master Plan Alternatives, and Preferred Master Plan

The Master Plan reflects the vision and interests of the community who live near the Complex and visit it frequently.

Community Workshops were attended by 1,570 community members and generated more than 7,500 questionnaire responses.

1.5 Community-Based Planning Process

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

26

Chapter 1 – Executive SummarySLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

The Silver Lake Reservoir Complex is conceived as a hybrid infrastructure that amplifies the use of a water body to attract and sustain wildlife, connect with nature and neighbors, and educate.

The Park will feature two flexible lawns with shade trees, a picnic grove and ornamental gardens with informal play area, and an education center along the east edge of Silver Lake Reservoir. At the intersection between the lawns and the water, stepped seating terraces give way to wetland terraces interwoven with small footpaths. Extending from the woodland habitats of the Knoll and Eucalyptus Grove is a new ecosystem that reintroduces coastal scrub and wetland habitat to the Complex for the first time in over 100 years. This rich tapestry of spaces is stitched together by the Promenade, a 2.5-mile loop around the inside of the reservoirs.

1.6 Master Plan Overview

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

27

Chapter 1 – Executive SummarySLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

The Master Plan design is founded on principals of sustainability, interweaving systems of ecology, water, and education cohesively. These visible forms of sustainability make the Silver Lake neighborhood and the City of Los Angeles leaders in freshwater resource management and stewards of urban wildlife.

The design of the Silver Lake Reservoir Complex incorporates habitat enhancement and expansion that emphasizes re-establishing wetlands at the site, a water management strategy that supports a healthy aquatic ecosystem, and an education facility with features that engage the community and teach residents, especially youth, about wildlife stewardship and climate adaptation.

1.7 Park Sustainability

Living Laboratory at Ivanhoe Overlook

Educational lookout at the Eucalyptus Grove FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

28

Chapter 1 – Executive SummarySLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

The project team has identified eight construction phases.

1.8 Park Phasing & Estimated Cost

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

29

Chapter 1 – Executive SummarySLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

1.9 Park EconomicsNOTE: the topics in this section are still in process.

1.10 Near-Term Action ItemsNOTE: the topics in this section are still in process.

Possible near-term items include:• Environmental Clearance (EIR/CEQA)

- (traffic study)• Sustainability Plan• Tree Health Assessment• Pilot project(s) funding• Governance structure implementation• Partnerships

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

OTHER PROJECT UPDATES1. Cultural Heritage Commission Subcommittee

2. Water Quality Model

3. Grant Funding

4. MP Pamphlet

SLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

31

CHC subcommitteeSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

Meetings:• Feb 12• April 23• May 28 (at SLRC)

Next Steps:• present design update to full Cultural Heritage Commission

(to be scheduled)

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

32

water quality modelSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

WATER QUALITY GOALS USED FOR MODEL:Pollutant Related Numerical Limits Not To Exceed Algae, Ammonia, Eutrophic, Odors

• Total Nitrogen: 1 mg/L • Ammonia-N: 2.15 mg/L (30-day average) • Ammonia-N: 5.95 mg/L (one-hour average) • Total Phosphorus: 0.1 mg/L • Chlorophyll-a 20 µg/L • Dissolved Oxygen: ≥5 mg/L (single sample one foot

from bottom)

Copper 22 µg/L

Lead 11 µg/L

PCBs (sediments)

22.7 µg/kg

pH 6.5 to 8.5

Trash Zero

Total Coliform • 10,000 MPN/100 mL (single sample) • 1,000 MPN/100 mL (single sample, Fecal/Total ≥ 0.1) • 1,000 MPN/100 mL (geometric monthly mean)

E. coli 235 MPN/100 mL (single sample) 126 MPN/100 mL (geometric monthly mean)

Enterococci 104 MPN/100 mL (single sample) 35 MPN/100 mL (geometric monthly mean)

Purpose: 1) Understand long-term impact on water

quality of project implementation.

WQ Goals / Metrics used: • Established by the Los Angeles

Regional Water Quality Control Board’s Basin Plan for the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties

• Also established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

* SLRCMP WQ model referenced water quality goals for Echo ParkFOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

33

water quality modelSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

(preliminary results)

Scenario 1 – Isolation Baseline

precipitationext. birds

Scenario 2 – Existing Baseline

precipitationext. birdspollock well

Scenario 3 – DWP Project Baseline

precipitationext. birdspollock wellaeration / recirc.stormwater capture

Scenario 4 - MP

precipitationext. birdspollock wellaeration / recirc.stormwater capturewetlands

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

34

water quality modelSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

(preliminary results)

Nitrogen

Phosphorus

Chlorophyll-a

Algae Surface Area Coverage

Key Indicators:Too much causes algae to grow faster than ecosystems can handle.

Too much causes algae to grow faster than ecosystems can handle.

The concentration of chlorophyll a present in the water is directly related to the amount of algae living in the water.

Excessive growth of these organisms, in turn, can clog water intakes, use up dissolved oxygen as they decompose, block light to deeper waters, and can cause water to become toxic.

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

35

water quality modelSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

(preliminary results)

scenario 1scenario 2

scenario 3scenario 4

wate

r qua

lity

Time

*graph not to scale and is a generalized representation of water quality"FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

36

grant fundingSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

Priorities• Minimum $1M award• Planning and design eligible

(near-term solution)• Criteria / goals of the grant are closely aligned to

MP project • Aligns with project schedule• Matching requirements max 25%

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY

37

grant fundingSLRCMP: Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #8

Potential Sources Being Researched and Vetted• Cal Parks• LA County Regional Park and Open Space District• California Natural Resources Agency• California Wildlife Conservation Board• US Fish and Wildlife Service• Federal Highway Administration• Baldwin Hills Conservancy• National Fish and Wildlife Foundation• The Conservation Fund• Private / Foundation

Most Promising

FOR STAKEHOLDER WORKING G

ROUP PURPOSES ONLY