short range correlations (hard nuclear processes) · 1. outstanding problems in src studies -...
TRANSCRIPT
Short Range Correlations� (Hard Nuclear Processes)�
3. Probing the deuteron at small distances�
4. Probing multi-nucleon SRCs in medium to heavy nuclei�
I. Short Range Correlation Studies�1. Outstanding Problems in SRC studies �
2. Choosing the probe reaction �
3. Extracting J/Psi-N interaction near the threshold �
II. Hard Photodisintegration of few-body systems�1. Probing the mechanism of hard QCD hadronic interaction �
2. Probing Non-nucleonic degrees of freedom/hidden color�
1. Outstanding Problems in SRC studies �
- Nuclear Forces at Short Distances: �NN repulsive core
- Direct Observation of the dominance of high momentum � protons in neutron rich heavy nuclei �
- Direct Observation of 3N SRCs�
- Non-Nucleonic Content of 2N SRCs�
- Nuclear Forces at Short Distances: � NN repulsive core
Jastrow 1951 assumed the existence of the hard core to explain the angular distribution of pp cross section at 340 MeV (r0=0.6fm)�
r0 = 0.4fm
Stability Theorem: Nuclei will Collapse without �Repulsive interaction 1950s Weisskopf, Blatt �
V 2N = V 2NEM
+ V 2N! + V 2N
R
V 2NR
= V c + V l2L2 + V tS12 + V lsL · S + vls2(L · S)2
V i = Vint,R + Vcore
Vcore =
!
1 + er!r0
a
"
!1
60’s
Modern NN Potentials�
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
5000
10 000
15 000
⇡
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
V C(r) [MeV]
r [fm]
-50
0
50
100
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
1S03S1OPEP
Lattice Calculations�
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
5000
10 000
15 000
Pauli Blocking
Contradicts Neutron Star Observations: �will predict masses not more than 0.1 - 0.6 Solar mass �
QCD
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
5000
10 000
15 000
Perturbative QCD �
Hidden Color�
Intrinsic strangeness/charm�
r
Vc, MeV
~80% hidden color Brodsky,Ji, Lepage, PRL 83
Probing the Deuteron at Short Distances�
d = pn + �� + NN⇤ + hc · · ·
hc = Nc,Nc
The NN core can be due to the orthogonality of �
h Nc,Nc | N,N i = 0
O.Hen et al Phys. ReV .C 2014
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
1
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1p , GeV/c
Deut
erum
wav
e fun
ction
fm3/2
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
1
10
10 2
10 3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1p , GeV/c
n(p)
GeV
-3
Probing Polarized Structure of the Deuteron at x > 1 �
- Tensor Polarized Deuteron = Compact Deuteron �
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
1
10
10 2
10 3
10 4
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
pnt Mev/C
Gev-3
(l11+l1-1+l10)/3
(l11+l1-1-2l10)/3@ ParisBonn A
pnz=0
Fig.6
for large k > kFermi nA(k) ⇡ aNN (A)nNN (k)
E. Piasetzky, MS, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman,J.Watson PRL , 2006
TheoreTcal analysis of BNL Data
Direct Measurement at JLab R.Subdei, et al Science , 2008
Missing Momentum [GeV/c]0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
SRC P
air Fr
action
(%)
10
210
C(e,e’p) ] /212C(e,e’pp) /12pp/2N from [
C(e,e’p)12C(e,e’pn) /12np/2N from
C(p,2p)12C(p,2pn) /12np/2N from
C(e,e’pn) ] /212C(e,e’pp) /12pp/np from [
pn
pp
Factor of 20�
Expected 4�(Wigner counting)�
Ppn/px
= 0.92+0.08�0.18
- Direct Observation of the dominance of high momentum � protons in neutron rich heavy nuclei �
p+A ! p+ p+ n+X
e+A ! e0 + p+ (p/n) +X
�(1)(k1, · · · , kc, · · · ,�kc, · · · , kA) ⇡UNN (kc)
k2cFA(k1, · · ·0 · · ·0 , · · · , kA)
nA(k) ⇡ aNN (A)nNN (k)
VT
Vc
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5r,fm
V, MeV
Theoretical Interpretation
VNN (r) � Vc(r) + Vt(r) · S12(r) + VLS · �L�S
S12 = 3(�1 · r̂)(�2 · r̂)� �1�2 S12|pp� = 0
S12|nn� = 0
S12|pn⇥ �= 0
Isospin 1 states
Isospin 0 states
S12|pn� = 0
3He
Explana'on lies in the dominance of the tensor part in the NN interac'on
M.S, Abrahamyan, Frankfurt,Strikman PRC,2005
VNN (r) � Vc(r) + Vt(r) · S12(r) + VLS · �L�S
S12 = 3(�1 · r̂)(�2 · r̂)� �1�2 S12|pp� = 0
S12|nn� = 0
S12|pn⇥ �= 0
Isospin 1 states
Isospin 0 states
S12|pn� = 0Sciavilla, Wiringa, Pieper, Carlson PRL,2007
0 1 2 3 4 5q (fm-1)
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
105
l NN(q
,Q=0
) (fm
6 )
AV18/UIX 4HeAV6’ 4HeAV4’ 4HeAV18 2H
Explana'on lies in the dominance of the tensor part in the NN interac'on
- Dominance of pn short range correlations� as compared to pp and nn SRCS �- Dominance of NN Tensor as compared � to the NN Central Forces at <= 1fm �
- Two New Properties of High Momentum Component�
- Energetic Protons in Neutron Rich Nuclei �
2006-2008s�
at p > kF
nA(p) ⇠ aNN (A) · nNN (p)
-- Dominance of pn Correlations � (neglecting pp and nn SRCs) nNN (p) ⇡ npn(p) ⇡ n(d)(p)
(1)
(2)
a2(A) ⌘ aNN (A) ⇡ apn(A)
nA(p) ⇠ apn(A) · nd(p)
- Define momentum distribution of proton & neutron nA(p) =
Z
AnAp (p) +
A� Z
AnAn (p)RnAp/n(p)d
3p = 1
(3)
- Define Ip =
Z
A
600Z
kF
nAp (p)d
3p In =A� Z
A
600Z
kF
nAn (p)d
3p
- and observe that in the limit of no pp and nn SRCs Ip = In
- Neglecting CM motion of SRCs Z
AnAp (p) ⇡
A� Z
AnAn (p)
First Property: Approximate Scaling Relation
- for ⇠ kF � 600 MeV/c region:
xp · nAp (p) ⇡ xn · nA
n (p)
where xp = ZA and xn = A�Z
A .
-‐if contribuTons by pp and nn SRCs are neglected and the pn SRC is assumed at rest MS,arXiv:1210.3280
Phys. Rev. C 2014
Realistic 3He Wave Function: Faddeev Equation
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
11010 210 3
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1p , GeV/c
x n(p)
, GeV
-3
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.4
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1p , GeV/c
Ratio
xpnp
xnnn
1/2 nd
.
MS,PRC 2014
Be9 Variational Monte Carlo Calculation: � Robert Wiringa 2013
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1010-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
k (fm-1)
l(k)
9Be(c) - AV18/UIX
lp
ln
hap://www.phy.anl.gov/theory/research/momenta/
0 2 4 6 8 1010-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
k (fm-1)
l(k)
10Be - AV18/UIX
lp
ln
B10 Variational Monte Carlo Calculation: � Robert Wiringa
Second Property:
xp · nAp (p) ⇡ xn · nA
n (p)
Using DefiniTon:
where y = |1� 2xp| = |xn � xp|- aNN (A, 0) corresponds to the probability of pn SRC in symmetric nuclei
- aNN (A, 1) = 0 according to our approximation of neglecting pp/nn SRCs
nA(p) =Z
AnAp (p) +
A� Z
AnAn (p)
ApproximaTons: nA(p) ⇠ aNN (A) · nNN (p)
nNN (p) ⇡ npn(p) ⇡ n(d)(p)
One Obtains: ⇡ 1
2aNN (A, y)nd(p)
MS,arXiv:1210.3280 Phys. Rev. C 2014
And: Ip = In Ip + In = 2IN = apn(A)
600Z
0
nd(p)d3p
Second Property: Fractional Dependence of � High Momentum Component
aNN (A, y) ⇡ aNN (A, 0) · f(y) with f(0) = 1 and f(1) = 0
f(|xp
� x
n
|) = 1�nP
j=1b
i
|xp
� x
x
|i withnP
j=1b
i
= 0
In the limit nP
j=1b
i
|xp
� x
x
|i ⌧ 1 Momentum distribuTons of p & n are inverse proporTonal to their fracTons
nA
p/n
(p) ⇡ 12xp/n
a2(A, y) · nd
(p)
xp/n = Z/NA
Observations: High Momentum Fractions
Pp/n
(A, y) = 12xp/n
a2(A, y)1R
kF
nd
(p)d3p
A Pp(%) Pn(%) 12 20 20 27 23 22 56 27 23 197 31 20
O. Hen, M.S. L. Weinstein, et.al. Science, 2014
Requires dominance of pn SRCs in heavy neutron reach nuclei
MS,arXiv:1210.3280 Phys. Rev. C 2014
Is the total kinetic energy inversion possible?
Checking for He3 �
Epkin = 14 MeV (p= 157 MeV/c)
Enkin = 19 MeV (p= 182 MeV/c)
Energetic Neutron �Energetic Neutron �(Neff & Horiuchi) �Ep
kin = 13.97 MeV
Enkin = 18.74 MeV
VMC Estimates: Robert Wiringa Table 1: Kinetic energies (in MeV) of proton and neutron
A y Epkin En
kin Epkin � En
kin8He 0.50 30.13 18.60 11.536He 0.33 27.66 19.06 8.609Li 0.33 31.39 24.91 6.483He 0.33 14.71 19.35 -4.643H 0.33 19.61 14.96 4.658Li 0.25 28.95 23.98 4.9710Be 0.2 30.20 25.95 4.257Li 0.14 26.88 24.54 2.349Be 0.11 29.82 27.09 2.7311B 0.09 33.40 31.75 1.65
MS,arXiv:1210.3280 Phys. Rev. C 2014
Heavy Nuclei ?
- Three Nucleon Short Range Correlations: �
Factorization of 2N SRC distribution in nuclei�
0
3
6 3He
0
3
6 4He
(mA/A
)/(m D
/2)
0
3
6
0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8x
9Be
12C
63Cu
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2x
197Au
Egiyan, et al PRC 2004 Fomin et al PRL 2011
- Three Nucleon Short Range Correlations: �
Subedi et al Science 2006
pm
rp 3r2p
pmr2p rp 3
q q(a) (b)
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55pn(GeV/c)
cosa
5.9 GeV/c, 988.0 GeV/c, 989.0 GeV/c, 985.9 GeV/c, 947.5 GeV/c, 94
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55
!cos -1.00 -0.98 -0.96 -0.94 -0.92 -0.90
Co
un
ts
0
10
20
30
40
!p
p
Tang et al PRL 2002
p+A ! p+ p+ n+X e+A ! e0 + pf + pb +X
- Three Nucleon Short Range Correlations: �
Factorization of 3N SRC distribution in nuclei?�
Egiyan, et al PRL 2006 Fomin et al PRL 2011
For 2 < x < 3 R ⇡ a3(A1)a3(A2)
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 1.5 2 2.5 3x
(mHe
4/4)/(m H
e3/3)
R(4He/3He)
CLASE02-019
- Three Nucleon Short Range Correlations: � New Signatures of 3N SRCs�
r2pr2p
q q
rp
p
rp
p
3
3
mm(a) (b)
20406080100120140160180 200
400
600
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
11010 2
20406080100120140160180 200
400
600
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
1
10
D(p
i,ER
,pR
), G
eV-5
D(p
i,ER
,pR
), G
eV-5
Or, Deg.
Or, Deg.
E R, M
eV
E R, M
eV
2N-I
3N-I
3N-II
3N-I
2N-I3N-I
3N-II3N-I
(a)
(b)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500ER, MeV
pp/pn
- Non-Nucleonic Content of 2N SRCs�
- The relative momenta in the NN system which will be sensitive to the core dynamics can be estimated based on the threshold of inelastic N-Delta transition �
- No non-nuclonic component is observed for pn system up to 650 MeV/c�
pM2
N + p2 �MN > M� �MN
p � 800 MeV/c
3. Deuteron > 800 MeV/c (core physics)�
4.Observation and systematic studies of 3N SRCs�
- Outstanding Problems in SRC studies�1. Deuteron 500 - 800 MeV/c �
2. Protons in neutron rich nuclei�
2. Choosing the probe�
� +A ! Nf + ⇡ +Nr +X
� +Ni ! Nf + ⇡at fixed and large ✓cm ⇠ 90
0
d�dt ⇠ f(✓cm)
s7 for E� > 1 GeV
si = s0 · ↵i Reaction chooses ↵i < 1!
Frankfurt, Liu, Strikman, Farrar PRL 1989
↵i =Ei�pz
iMN
- External probe selects a bound nucleon � moving in the probes direction �
� +A ! n+ ⇡+ +Nr +X
� +A ! p+ ⇡� +Nr +X
� +A ! p+ ⇡0 +Nr +X
Probing proton
Probing neutron
Probing proton
Maria Patsyuk’s talk
3. Probing the Deuteron at Small Distances��
� �
⇡
⇡ ⇡
NN
N N
3. Probing multi-nucleon SRCs in medium to heavy� nuclei��
Maria Patsyuk’s talk
II. Hard Photodisintegration of few-body systems�1. Probing the mechanism of hard QCD hadronic interaction �
N
N
N
N
qqq- g g g
-Can be Studied in Hard Exclusive NN Scattering Reactions
-Last Experiments were done at early 90’s at AGS, BNL
N
N
N
N
q qqq- g g g
s = (k! + pd)2 = 2MdE! + M2
d
t = (k! ! pN )2 = [cos!cm ! 1]s ! M2
d
2
E! = 2 GeV, s = 12 GeV2, t |900" !4 GeV2, Mx = 2 GeV
E! = 12 GeV, s = 41 GeV2, t |900" !18.7 GeV2, Mx = 4.4 GeV
Mx! N
ND
Brodsky, Chertock, 1976
Holt, 1990
Gilman, Gross, 2002
! D, 3He(pp, n)
N,�, ...R
N,�, ...R
(⇤)
A
B
C
D
f(t
s)
1
s
A ! F (t
s)
1
snA+nB+nC+nD
2!2
d!
dt!
|A|2
s2= F
2(t
s)
1
snA+nB+nC+nD!2
Brodsky, Farrar 1975Matveev, Muradyan, Takhvelidze, 1975
1
s
additional
Exclusive large-momentum-transferscattering
•Dimensional counting rule:
)f( S st)2-n(N- A DCB nnn
CDABdtd +++=
→
∝σ
N = 1 + 6 + 3 + 3 – 2 = 11
) ( ) ( tt phighnphighpd +→γFor
Notice:
410 GeV/c) 4( / GeV/c) 1( ≈== γγ
σσ EdtdE
dtd
scaling
!d ! pn
0
5
1 0
1 5
2 0
0 1 2 3 4 5
x=0x=0.5x=1.0x=1.5x=2.0
i = Ea = Q2/2mx
W2 < m d2
17
13
86
66
52
50
NNN6
(GeV)
(GeV
2 )
Mx!N
ND
Gilman & Gross 2002
!
k + qpdp
p
p
p2
1
B
q
A
k 2
k 1
1
Mx
Mx
N
N
N
N
Mmax=w > 2 GeV
w !
!
2E!mN
E! ! 2.5 GeV
NN -amplitude
pQCD
Frankfurt, Miller, MS, Striman Phys. Rev. Lea. 2000
0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3 3.25 3.5 3.75 4 4.25 4.5Ea , GeV
s11dm
/dt (
kb-G
eV20
)
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.61.8
2
20 40 60 80 100 120 140Ocm , deg
dm/d1
cm(n
b/sr
)
a + d A p + n
a + d A p + n, Ea=2.4 GeV
10-3
10-2
10-1
1
10
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
�c.m.
s10d�/dt
pn ! pn
� + d ! p+ n
Break up of pn from the deuteron Break up of pp from Helium 3
d2p
n
p
n
p
n
p
p
He3
p
Brodsky, Frankfurt, Gilman, Hiller, Miller Piasetzky, M.S., Strikman Phys. Lea. B 2004
Frankfurt,Miller,M.S. Strikman Phys. Lea. Let. 2000
Break up of pp from Helium 3�
p
n
p
p
He3
p
pp
p
n
p
n
! s!13 ! s
!11
(GeV)aE0 1 2 3 4 50.00
0.05
0.10 ,pp)naHe(3
c.m.°90
X 1/5
X 1/200
b.
)20/dt
(kb Ge
Vmd11 s
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0MainzSLAC NE17SLAC NE8JLab E89-012This workQGSRNAHRM
,p)nad( c.m.°90
)2s (GeV4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
a.
s11 d�dt
C. Grandos,MS, Phys. Rev. C 2009
Photodisintegration of 3He:
56
� +3 He ! p+ d
D. Maheswari,MS, 2017 Phys. Rev. C in press
I.Pomerantz , et al Phys. Rev. Lea. 2013
What’s Next:
1. Studying Hard Hadronic Processes
Break – up reactions to the deuteron break-up of other 2Baryons
Extraction of hard Baryonic Helicity Amplitudes from Polarized measurement
2. Probing or component of the nucleon
! D, 3He(pp, n)
N,�, ...R
N,�, ...R
(⇤)
� + d ! �+� M. S., and C.GranadosPhys. Rev. C 2011
(ss̄) (cc̄)
Studying cc component in the deuteron
� + d� p + �+c + D�c
d2
p
n
p
d2p
n
p
�+c �+
c
D�c
D�c
Intrinsic Produced
Outlook- (JLAB 4-6 GeV) : Experimentally established adequacy of QCD degrees of freedom in hard break-up of light nuclei - (JLAB 4-6 GeV) : Hard Rescattering Mechanism consistent with major observations of the break-up reaction
- (JLAB 12 GeV ) : Studying Hard Rescattering Mechanism of break up of light nuclei into baryonic resonances (including strangeness production)
III. Extracting J/Psi-N interaction near the threshold �-Vector meson photoproduction can be used to extract VN scattering cross section �- Experience from coherent vector meson photoproduction� � + d ! V + d0
10-1
1
10
10 2
10 3
10 4
10 5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4-t [GeV2]
dm/d
t [n
b/(G
eV)2 ]
Figure 2
10-1
1
10
-2 -1.75 -1.5 -1.25 -1 -0.75 -0.5 -0.25 0t (GeV2/c2)
dm/dt
[nb/(
GeV2 /c2 )]
�⇢N = 25mb
III. Extracting J/Psi-N interaction near the threshold �
v
vv
vv
v
v
vv
v
v
vv
v
v
� + d ! J/ + p+ n Adam Freese, MS, PRC 2013
Outlook �
- Vector Meson Production with deuteron break-up is an � effective tools for extracting VN scattering cross section�