shepotylo eerc may_2016_policy_and_firms_performance

20

Upload: irina-sobetskaya

Post on 13-Apr-2017

63 views

Category:

Science


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Policy liberalization and �rms' performance

O. Shepotylo1

1Department of Economics

University of Bradford

40th EERC Research Workshop

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 1 / 17

Introduction

After this talk you will learn

how productivity responds to policy liberalization

how non-tari� measures in�uence quality

how wages are linked to market power and productivity

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 2 / 17

Modeling approach

Consider industry

Firms di�er in productivity

Competition is imperfect

Monopolistic Competition

Each year

�rms expand and contract market share

some �rms shut down

and some �rms enter

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 3 / 17

Trade policy, quality and productivity. Channels

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 4 / 17

Does policy liberalization increase growth?

Theoretical and empirical results show that liberalization is bene�cial

for the strongest, most productive �rms

It is also known as Matthew e�ect:

For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall

have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken

even that which he hath. �Matthew 25:29, King James

Version.

But, it is bene�cial for the whole economy!

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 5 / 17

Does policy liberalization increase growth?

Theoretical and empirical results show that liberalization is bene�cial

for the strongest, most productive �rms

It is also known as Matthew e�ect:

For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall

have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken

even that which he hath. �Matthew 25:29, King James

Version.

But, it is bene�cial for the whole economy!

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 5 / 17

Does policy liberalization increase growth?

Theoretical and empirical results show that liberalization is bene�cial

for the strongest, most productive �rms

It is also known as Matthew e�ect:

For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall

have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken

even that which he hath. �Matthew 25:29, King James

Version.

But, it is bene�cial for the whole economy!

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 5 / 17

Did WTO accession help Ukraine?

Ukraine joined WTO on May 16th 2008

Small reduction in tari�s

Large changes in services sectors!

Results

Shift from manufacturing to services

Increase in productivity in manufacturing

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 6 / 17

Evolution of services

Source: Shepotylo and Vakhitov (2015)

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in services

Shepotylo and Vakhitov (2015)

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 8 / 17

Gains in productivity

Shepotylo and Vakhitov (2015) More productive �rms gained more as a

result of services liberalization

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 9 / 17

Services liberalization in Ukraine

Services liberalization and productivity (Ukraine; Shepotylo and

Vakhitov, 2015)

An increase in services liberalization index by a standard deviation leads

to a 9.2 percent increase in productivity among manufacturing �rms

Matthew e�ect: More productive �rms bene�ted more - leads to

e�cient reallocation of resources

E�ect is stronger for domestic and small �rms.

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 10 / 17

NTM and quality

Study of �rms in food industry in Ukraine 2001-2010 (Movchan, Shepotylo

and Vakhitov, 2015)

NTM (restrictions on technology) in the �nal good sector:

some �rms to upgrade their quality:

purchase better inputs

upgrade capital

improve human capital quality

NTM in the intermediate goods sector

Firms with lower quality inputs switch to better ones or shut down

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 11 / 17

NTM and �rm performance

More stringent health regulations

force �rms to purchase ingredients of better quality and play a role of

a positive demand shifter

NTMs are likely to increase costs and change composition of inputs

from the upstream industries

which have a positive e�ect on exports of more productive �rms

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 12 / 17

Results

More NTM on inputs has overall negative e�ect on quantity

imported, neutral for import prices

But: with NTM, �rms buy more expensive ingredients and capital

equipment, but cheaper packaging

Quality e�ect: More stringent NTM regulations for �rm's inputs

increase output prices

Conditional on the level of NTM protection, less productive �rms are

more likely to exit

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 13 / 17

Policy liberalization and wages

Shepotylo, Vakhitov, and Uschev 2015

Build a model that links wages and market power

Show that labor market bargaining power crucially depends on inverse

demand elasticity

Test the predictions of the model at �rm level

Demonstrate that

market power and productivity are important determinants of wages

Firms with more market power pay lower wages

Firms with higher productivity pay higher wages

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 14 / 17

Barganing power and �rm size

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 15 / 17

Wages, productivity and markups

Dependent variable: D. ln(w)(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

D.ln(LP) 0.163∗∗∗ 0.151∗∗∗ 0.151∗∗∗ 0.151∗∗∗ 0.148∗∗∗ 0.148∗∗∗

(0.006) (0.035) (0.035) (0.035) (0.036) (0.036)

D.Markup -0.251∗∗∗ -0.145∗∗∗ -0.146∗∗∗ -0.145∗∗∗ -0.148∗∗∗ -0.148∗∗∗

(0.012) (0.039) (0.039) (0.039) (0.039) (0.039)

D.ln(h) -0.008 -0.019∗ -0.019∗ -0.019∗ -0.024∗∗ -0.024∗∗

(0.009) (0.011) (0.011) (0.011) (0.012) (0.012)

Industry × Year Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Region FE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Observations 31224 29019 29019 29019 29019 29019

Hansen J statistics 4.532 4.600 4.573 4.408 4.514

p-value 0.209 0.204 0.206 0.221 0.211

R2 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.302 0.302

Thank You!

Questions?

[email protected]

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 17 / 17

Shepotylo, O. and Vakhitov, V. (2015). Services liberalization and

productivity of manufacturing �rms. Economics of Transition,

23(1):1�44.

O. Shepotylo (Department of Economics University of Bradford )Liberalization and �rms EERC, Kyiv 2016 17 / 17