sfusd 2011-12 expenditure proposal finalweb.sfusd.edu › services › research_public ›...
TRANSCRIPT
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 14 of 56
Performance Measures
The current year’s submission reflects a continuation and expansion of the revision work initiated for the 2010-
11 Plan. These performance measures incorporate recommendations from the Controller’s annual report (June
2010) as well as additional instructions received from their office.
In response to the specific recommendations made by the Controller’s office and to internal review of the
Performance Measures, the following revisions were made:
1. Several goals were revised and reformulated to make sure they reflect the programs’ actual goals, or to
capture changes in the programs’ priorities (e.g. Teacher Academy).
2. For some goals, different or new performance measures were selected that better address the specific
objectives of the goals.
3. More outcome measures were selected or developed in accordance with the recommendation from the
Controller’s Annual Report for FY2010-11; “The Unified School District should improve their mix of
performance measures to focus more on outcomes instead of outputs by creating new or revising
existing measures for 2011-12”.
4. Comments on significant changes to performance measures were added for each measure, in accordance
with instructions from the Controller’s office for the FY 2011-12 Expenditure plan.
5. Details about data sources were added.
6. Descriptions of performance measures where necessary were added.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 15 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Sports, Libraries, Arts and Music
Physical Education: Goal 1: Increase access and equity in Physical Education
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06 0
2006-07 1
2007-08 12
2008-09 20 20
2009-10 30 30 31
2010-11 30 35
2011-12 36
1b. 2005-06 56%
2006-07 59%
new measure 2007-08 65%
2008-09 65%
2009-10 65%
2010-11 65%
2011-12 65%
Additional measure info, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Additional measure info: Measure shows number of schools receiving full program support. The total number of elementary schools receiving some
type of support for Physical Education is higher.
Data Source: Physical Education records.
Significant changes: Projection FY10-11: The Physical Education department has been adjusting the schedules of the Physical Education
Specialists to accommodate more schools.
1b:
Data Source: California Physical Fitness Test. California Department of Education.
Significant changes: None.
Physical Education Performance Measures
Percentage of 9th grade students who pass the California
Physical Fitness Test (pass 5/6 or 6/6 fitness
standards).
Number of elementary schools receiving PEEF funded
Program Support (equipment, Physical Education Site
Coordinator, Physical Education specialist, and
implementation specialist).
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 16 of 56
Physical Education: Goal 2: Improve Instructional Quality in Physical Education
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06 0
2006-07 0
2007-08 21.6
2008-09 20.2 20.2
2009-10 15* 15* 19
2010-11 15* 19
2011-12 19
2b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 81%
2008-09 79%
2009-10 **
2010-11 79%
2011-12 79%
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
2a:
Data source: Physical Education Department records, staff roster.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Funding for secondary Physical Education teachers is no longer available.
2b:
Data source: Annual Physical Education Survey for teachers.
Significant changes: None.
*The 2009-10 target and projections, and the 2010-11 target show elementary school FTEs only, whereas targets and projections for P.E.
Specialists at all school levels should have been reported.
**Data not collected.
Percentage of elementary school teachers that agree or
strongly agree that Elementary School Physical
Education Specialists have helped them become a better
teacher of Physical Education.
Number of PEEF funded Physical Education Specialist
FTEs.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 17 of 56
Physical Education: Goal 3: Increase School Capacity to provide quality K-12 Physical Education
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
3a. 2005-06 10
2006-07 20
2007-08 30
2008-09 35 35
2009-10 40 40 59
2010-11 30 30
2011-12 30
3b. 2005-06 0
2006-07 8
2007-08 33
2008-09 35 35
2009-10 40 40 31
2010-11 30 121
2011-12 120
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
3a:
Data Source: Physical Education department records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Two secondary implementation specialists were hired in 2010-11.
The extra capacity made it possible to provide more professional development trainings.
FY10-11 Projection: In the 2010-11 school year, the location of the professional development trainings changed.
The new space can hold more participants, fewer trainings are necessary.
3b:
Data source: Physical Education department records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: In 2009-10, professional development trainings at different sites were combined and more
participants received training at each site.
FY10-11 Projection: In 2010-11, the professional development model was updated to provide on-site training at each
school site. Elementary Physical Education specialists will provide a minimum of four professional development trainings at
school sites.
Number of professional development trainings for
Physical Education teachers of all school levels.
Number of professional development trainings for
elementary school classroom teachers.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 18 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Sports, Libraries, Arts and Music
Athletics: Goal 1: To provide accessible athletic opportunities to middle and high school students.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06
2006-07 2,406; 21%
2007-08 2,434; 21%
2008-09 2,472 2,472; 22%
2009-10 2,500 2,500 2,601; 24%
2010-11 2,500 2,500
2011-12 2,500
1b. 2005-06
2006-07 3,706; 21%
2007-08 3,517; 20%
2008-09 3,650 3,663; 21%
2009-10 3,700 3,700 3,614; 21%
2010-11 3,700 3,700
2011-12 3,700
1c. 2005-06
2006-07 20
2007-08 75
2008-09 200 199
2009-10 130 130 216
2010-2011 130 200
2011-12 200
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Additional measure info:
Data source: Team roster. Students identified by ID number.
Significant changes: FY10-11 Projection: Willie L. Brown Jr. Academy College Preparatory School is closing. This is expected to reduce
the number of middle school student athletes by approximately 100.
1b:
Additional measure info:
Data source: Team roster. Students identified by ID number.
Significant changes:
1c:
Additional measure info: The Athletic dept. provides paid head coaches for all 28 sports offered and paid assistant coaches for 14 sports.
Data source: Athletics department records.
Significant changes:
Number and percentage of all middle school students
participating in athletics.
Number and percentage of all high school students
participating in athletics.
Number of PEEF funded athletic coaches.
Athletics Department Performance Measures
The Athletic Department offers one boys sport, three girls sports, and three co-ed sports to 6-8th grade students at 22 K-8
and middle schools.
The Athletic Department offers five boys sports, seven girls, and nine co-ed sports to 9-12th grade students at 12 high
schools.
FY10-11 Projection: A new high school, San Francisco International will be fielding team. This is expected to increase the
number of high school student athletes by approximately 100.
FY09-10 Actual: The Athletic Department has three funding sources. In 09-10 the Athletic Department projected a reduced
allocation from SFUSD funding (non-PEEF). This did not take place, therefore actual numbers remained fairly consistent with
previous year.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 19 of 56
Athletics: Goal 2: Improve Safety in athletic programs at middle and high schools.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06
2006-07 177; 5%
2007-08 201; 6%
2008-09 333; 9%
2009-10 527; 14%
2010-11 500
2011-12 500
2b. 2005-06
2006-07 70
2007-08 306
2008-09 370 311
2009-10 375 300 286
2010-11 300 350
2011-12 350
2c. 2005-06
2006-07 3
2007-08 4
2008-09 4
2009-10 4 3
2010-11 4 4
2011-12 3
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
2a:
Additional measure info:
Data source: Athletics Department records; annual trainer reports.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: More students are aware of and take advantage of the services provided by the trainers.
2b:
Additional measure info: The Athletic Department provides private security guards and SFPD officers at various games to promote a safe environment.
Data source: Athletics Department records.
Significant changes:
2c:
Additional measure info:
Data source: Event incident reports written by security guards and San Francisco Police Officers.
Significant changes: No significant changes.
Number and percentage of high school student athletes
receiving preventative or restorative treatment provided
by PEEF funded athletic trainers.
Number of private security guards and San Francisco
Police School Resource Officers servicing athletic
contests supported by PEEF funds .
Number of disruptive or violent incidents that were
resolved by security and police at athletic events.
FY09-10 Actual: Several games were cancelled in 09-10 because of a reduced number of participating teams.
The Athletic Department promotes a safe and secure environment for student athletes and spectators at scheduled sporting
events.
The athletic trainers servicing the SFUSD Athletic Program are Certified Athletic Trainers, employed by UCSF. Their functions
include treatment of student athlete injuries, working with athletes and coaches on the prevention of injuries, and providing
reduction to athletes on proper health and hygiene procedures to maximize their athletic abilities and lead overall healthy
lives.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 20 of 56
Athletics: Goal 3: Increase district capacity to provide well-supported athletic opportunities.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
3a. 2005-06
2006-07 22
2007-08 18
2008-09 150 150
2009-10 200 150 95
2010-11 100 100
2011-12 100
3b. 2005-06
2006-07 764
2007-08 414
2008-09 321 438
2009-10 350 450 369
2010-11 450 1,450
2011-12 1,500
3c. 2005-06
2006-07 600
2007-08 878
2008-09 1,016 1,093
2009-10 1,000 1,000 836
2010-11 1,200 1,200
2011-12 1,200
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
3a:
Additional measure info:
Data source: Athletics Department records. Reimbursement receipts from coaches.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The actual is lower than anticipated because many coaches received their certification in the previous year.
3b:
Data source: Athletics Department records.
Significant changes: FY10-11 Projection: In 2010-11, allocations to Athletics from other funding sources were reduced by 40%. The Athletic
department's PEEF funding was reallocated to make up for the reduction from other sources.
3c:
Additional measure info: Providing students with bus rides increase student athlete class time.
Data source: Athletics Department records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: In 09-10 the Athletics Department offered 1,000 bus rides to SFUSD schools. The reason target was not
met is that schools were not taking advantage of all the rides offered.
FY10-11 Projection: In 10-11 each middle school is being offered two more rides annually. Furthermore, the Athletics
Department is increasing its efforts to make sure the schools take advantage of rides offered.
Number of fully officiated athletic contests (games,
matches, meets, and tournaments) supported by PEEF
funds.
Number of bus trips provided for athletic teams.
Number of professional development trainings for
coaches supported by PEEF funds.
Mandatory professional development trainings for coaches include First Aid training, CPR training, and high school coaching
certification. A high school coach certification is valid for life, he/she does not need to be re-certificated every year. First Aid
and CPR certifications are valid from 1-3 years and must be renewed. In 2008-09 all three certifications became mandatory for
all coaches.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 21 of 56
Libraries: Goal 1: Increase access to and equity of school library services.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06 28,160; 52%
2006-07 43,030; 81%
2007-08 48,492; 92%
new measure 2008-09 50,686; 96%
2009-10 50,170; 95%
2010-11 52,851
2011-12 53,033
1b. 2005-06 18
2006-07 16
2007-08 21
new measure 2008-09 21
2009-10 21
2010-11 21
2011-12 21
1c. 2005-06 N/A
2006-07 N/A
2007-08 16,757
new measure 2008-09 21,834
2009-10 26,248
2010-11 32,078
2011-12 34,000
1d. 2005-06 47
2006-07 60
2007-08 100*
2008-09 102
2009-10 107 107 105
2010-11 107 104
2011-12 105
Libraries Department Performance Measures
Number and percentage of students with access to a library
at their school site staffed with a Teacher Librarian.
Number of libraries that have technology access and use
online subscription resources (library research/reference
database).
Average monthly circulation totals in SFUSD.
Average number of hours per week that school libraries are
open with a Teacher Librarian present.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 22 of 56
Libraries: Goal 1: Increase access to and equity of school library services.
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Additional measure info: This measure shows all students with access to a Teacher Librarian staffed library in all SFUSD (incorporates all funding sources).
Data source: CBEDS numbers for each school site that has a library staffed with a teacher librarian. Data source for schools with Teacher
Librarians: Library records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Despite a slight decrease, the student access has effectively plateaued.
FY10-11 Projection: Starting in 2010-11, all high schools are receiving a stipend for library staffing. SF International and SF Public
Montessori do not have Teacher Librarians this year, therefore the projection is not 100% of all students.
1b:
Data source: FTE hours for each site for Teacher Librarians. Number of FTEs multiplied by number of hours divided by number of schools served.
Assuming library is open equal to Teacher Librarian FTE minus 30 min. for lunch; prep time for secondary are not deducted.
35 hours = 1.0 FTE.
Significant changes: None.
1c:
Additional measure info: The measure represents average number of books and other media checked out over the course of a month in SFUSD.
Data source: The database Destiny Library Manager.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The steady increase through 2009-10 reflects key elements such as improved professional development
trainings, collaboration between Teacher Librarians and classroom teachers, and expanded use of technology through databases.
FY10-11 Projection: Due to additional high school staffing in 2010-11, the Library services department is anticipating
increased circulation.
1d:
Data source: Library Services records.
Significant changes: None.
*Data not previously reported to the Controller's office.
N/A = Data not available.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 23 of 56
Libraries: Goal 2: Improve instructional quality by collaborating with classroom teachers.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06 6
2006-07 23.5
2007-08 40
2008-09 43
2009-10 43.3 42.1
2010-11 42 44.4
2011-12 44.5
2b. 2005-06 N/A
2006-07 20
2007-08 29
2008-09 28 28
2009-10 28 21 27
2010-11 21 27
2011-12 27
2c. 2005-06 N/A
2006-07 N/A
2007-08 N/A
New measure 2008-09 31
2009-10 35
2010-11 35
2011-12 71
2d. 2005-06 N/A
2006-07 N/A
2007-08 91%
2008-09 82%
2009-10 91%
2010-11 91%
2011-12 91%
Percentage of Teacher Librarians who agree or strongly agree
that the professional development meetings offered by
library services have helped them become a more effective
teacher librarian.
Number of elementary classroom teachers formally
collaborating with Teacher Librarians on research projects.
Number of professional development trainings held annually
for K-12 Teacher Librarians.
Number of PEEF funded certified Teacher Librarian FTEs.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 24 of 56
Libraries: Goal 2: Improve instructional quality by collaborating with classroom teachers.
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
2a:
Data source: Library services records.
Significant changes: None.
2b:
Data source: Library services records.
Significant changes: None.
2c:
Additional measure info: In 2008-09, Library Services started focusing on collaboration between Teacher Librarians and classroom teachers. The first
two years, emphasis was placed on collaboration between 3rd grade teachers and Teacher Librarians. Starting in 2010-11,
4th and 5th grade teachers were included in the project.
Data source: Teacher Librarian surveys.
Significant changes: FY11-12 Target: Because of the inclusion of 4th and 5th grade classroom teachers in the collaborative research projects,
number of teachers is expected to double compared to the 2009-10 actual.
2d:
Data source: End of the year Teacher Librarian survey. Survey was first administered in 2007-08.
Significant changes: None.
N/A = Data not available.
Libraries: Goal 3: Increase school capacity by providing highly-skilled and effective Teacher Librarians.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
3a: 2005-06 48/110
2006-07 87/104
2007-08 91/106
new measure 2008-09 95/102
2009-10 94/102
2010-11 102/104
2011-12 98/103
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
3a:
Data source: Library Services records and CBEDS.
Significant changes: Projection 2010-11: High schools are receiving PEEF funds from Libraries starting this year. This will increase the number of high
schools with a Teacher Librarian. Two schools do not have Teacher Librarians in 2010-11: SF International and SF Public Montessori.
FY10-11 Target: Target is reduced because the 2011-12 budget does not include a traveling Teacher Librarian who serves small
high schools.
Number of schools with a Teacher Librarian (over total
number of schools).
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 25 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Sports, Libraries, Arts and Music
Visual and Performing Arts: Goal 1: Increase Access and Equity in Visual and Performing Arts Education
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06 516
2006-07 498
2007-08 571
2008-09 973 1,079
2009-10 973 1,065 1,076
2010-11 1,079 1,076
2011-12 1,076
1b. 2005-06 11,328; 20.1%
2006-07 11,482; 20.7%
2007-08 12,257; 22.2%
2008-09 21,102 22,611; 40.9%
2009-10 21,102 22,499 22,747; 42.9%
2010-11 22,611 22,747
2011-12 22,747
1c. 2005-06 N/A
2006-07 7,200
2007-08 9,405
2008-09 11,500 11,550
2009-10 12,000 11,500 11,500
2010-11 11,500 9,500
2011-12 11,500
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Data source: For Elementary School - Visual & Performing Arts Department records. For secondary level - California Basic Educational Data System
Significant changes: None.
1b:
Data source: For Elementary School - Visual & Performing Arts Department records. For secondary level - California Basic Educational Data System
Significant changes: None.
1c:
Data source: Visual & Performing Arts Department records.
Significant changes: FY10-11 Projection: Projection reflected budget cuts to Young At Art production budget, potentially impacting participation,
including the loss of a community day event.
FY11-12 Target: Target reflects anticipated restoration of Young At Art funds that will allow participation to return to previous
levels.
Visual and Performing Arts Department Performance Measures
Number of Visual and Performing Arts classes offered.
Number and percentage of students enrolled in Visual
and Performing Arts classes.
Number of students participating in Young at Art
Festival.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 26 of 56
Visual and Performing Arts: Goal 2: Improve Instructional Quality in Visual and Performing Arts Education
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06 0
2006-07 18
2007-08 26
2008-09 20 24
2009-10 20 26 23
2010-11 20 15
2011-12 15
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
2a:
Data source: Visual & Performing Arts Department records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Funding levels allowed for monthly Arts Coordinator meetings/Professional Development workshops, plus
additional Professional Development for principals.
FY10-11 Projection: Funding for professional development workshops was reduced to reflect staffing needs.
Visual and Performing Arts: Goal 3: Increase School Capacity to provide Visual and Performing Arts Education
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
3a. 2005-06 13.8
2006-07 14.2
2007-08 24
2008-09 43 42.4
2009-10 43 43.4 42.5
2010-11 43.4 42.2
2011-12 41.4
3b. 2005-06 0
2006-07 76/71
2007-08 106/102
2008-09 104/102 106/102
2009-10 104/102 106/103 106/103
2010-11 106/103 105/105
2010-11 105/105
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
3a:
Data Source: Visual & Performing Arts & Roster records
Significant changes: FY11-12 Target: Based on budgeted FTEs (lower budgeted FTE due to Willie Brown closure and additional reduction of 0.4 travel
allocation for split positions)
3b:
Additional measure info: The first year (2006-07) that the Visual and Performing Arts Department had Arts Coordinators, the program was only serving
Elementary and K-8 schools. In 2006-07, the total number of Elementary and K-8 schools was 71.
The following year (2007-08) Middle Schools and High Schools (Secondary schools) also received Arts Coordinators.
Data source: Visual & Performing Arts records.
Significant changes: None.
Number of professional development workshops
provided.
Number of credentialed Visual and Performing Arts
teachers.
Number of PEEF funded Arts Coordinators (number of
arts coordinators/total number of schools).
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 27 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund -Other General Uses
Student Support Services: Goal 1: Increase Access of Student Support Professionals offering health and mental health services to
K-12 students.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 3.16%/1,742
2008-09 1,742 3.54%/1,952
2009-10 1,742 1,952 3.08%/1,634
2010-11 1,659 1,634
2011-12 1,650
1b. 2005-06 1/1,207
2006-07 1/927
2007-08 1/680
2008-09 1/680* 1/680
2009-10 1/680** 1/680 1/896
2010-11 1/853 1/916
2011-12 1/916
1c. 2005-06 0/10,881
2006-07 0/10.270
2007-08 1/1,447
2008-09 1/1,1447 1/1,440
2009-10 1/1,447 1/1,447 1/1,411
2010-11 1/1440 1/1,372
2011-12 1/1,372
1d. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 2,995
2008-09 2,995 2,629
2009-10 2,995 2,500 2,591
2010-11 2,500 2,591
2011-12 2,591
Additional measure information, data source, and signficant changes.
1a:
Data source: Student Support Services records and California Basic Education Data System enrollment numbers.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The decrease is due to a reduction in individual services and an increase in school-wide interventions (e.g. mentor programs).
1b:
Data source: Student Support Services records and California Basic Educational Data System enrollment numbers.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: A 15% decrease of PEEF funding resulted in a reduction of 7.5 FTE Student Support Professionals.
1c:
Data source: Student Support Services records and California Basic Educational Data System enrollment numbers.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The decrease is due to a reduction in individual services and an increase in school-wide interventions (e.g. mentor programs).
1d:
Additional measure info: Student Assistance Programs are weekly school site meetings where the Student Professionals and other professionals meet with the
principal to discuss students who are experiencing barriers to success. Student Success Teams provide a one-student intervention approach.
Student Support Professionals, parents, teachers, and the student meet to discuss ways to improve student success in school.
Other student intervention approaches include mentoring programs, afterschool programs, and counseling groups.
Data source: Student Support Services records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Due to budget reductions, there are fewer Student Support Professionals at the sites to facilitate Student Assistance
meetings and Students Success meetings.
Student Support Professionals Performance Measures
Percentage and number of students receiving individual
and/or group health/mental health services.
Ratio of PEEF funded Student Support Professional to
students at Elementary schools and K-8 sites.
Ratio of PEEF funded Student Support Professionals to
students at Middle Schools.
Number of students referred to Student Assistance
Programs or Student Success Teams.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 28 of 56
Student Support Services: Goal 2: Improve the social and emotional learning of students.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 734
2008-09 734 633
2009-10 734 633 661
2010-11 538 500
2011-12 500
2b. 2005-06 94.85%
2006-07 95.19%
2007-08 95.09%
2008-09 95.30%
2009-10 95.30% 95.64%
2010-11 95.30% 95.64%
2011-12 95.64%
2c. 2005-06 96.29%
2006-07 96.44%
2007-08 96.34%
2008-09 96.50%
2009-10 96.50% 96.69%
2010-11 96.50% 96.69%
2011-12 96.69%
2d. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 4,364
2008-09 4,364 2,562
2009-10 4,364 2,562 2,695
2010-11 2,178 2,700
2011-12 2,700
Additional measure information, data source, and signficant changes.
2a:
Data source: Student Support Services records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The decrease is due to a reduction in classroom presentations and increase in school-wide interventions
(i.e. mentor programs).
FY10-11 Projection: The decrease is due to a reduction in classroom presentations and increase in school-wide interventions
(i.e. mentor programs).
2b:
Data source: Daily Average Attendance
Significant changes: None.
2c:
Data source: Daily Average Attendance
Significant changes: None.
2d:
Additional measure info: A Student Behavior Plan is developed to help a student reduce his/her behavioral challenges at school. A reduction in number of plans
developed is a positive outcome.
Data source: Student Support Services records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The decrease is due to a reduction in teachers' requests for plans. The decrease can be attributed to a growing number of
student interventions being developed and implemented. The successful implementation of interventions will reduce the number of
behavior plans necessary to adress students' needs.
**The target was incorrectly reported in previous years as 3/680. This was a reporting error.
*The target was incorrectly reported in previous years as 2/680. This was a reporting error.
Number of classroom presentations related to health
promotion and mental health.
Average daily attendance for K-5 and K-8 students.
Average daily attendance for middle school students.
Number of Student Behavior Plans developed by Student
Support Professionals and teachers.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 29 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund -Other General Uses
Peer Resources: Goal 1: Increase student engagement with, and connection to, their school community.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06
2006-07 932
2007-08 1,575
2008-09 1,580 1,533
2009-10 1,580 1,550 1,631
2010-11 1,150 1,050
2011-12 1,050
1b. 2005-06
2006-07 17,717
2007-08 20,244
2008-09 20,000 19,310
2009-10 22,000 19,000 16,126
2010-11 13,000 13,000
2011-12 13,000
1c. 2005-06
2006-07 835
2007-08 1,115
2008-09 1,000 773
2009-10 1,000 1,000 743
2010-11 500 500
2011-12 500
1d. 2005-06
2006-07 42%
2007-08 70%
2008-09 73% 70%
2009-10 75% 75% 72%
2010-11 72% 72%
2011-12 72%
Peer Resources Performance Measures
Number of students served.
Number of students participating in peer mentoring, peer
tutoring, and peer support groups (direct services).
Number of students participating in conflict mediation.
Percentage of students who, after participating in Peer
Resources, report increased School Engagement.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 30 of 56
Peer Resources: Goal 1: Increase student engagement with, and connection to, their school community.
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Data source: Peer resources records; student roster and weekly tracking logs.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The demand for services fluctuates at the school sites. In 2009-10 demand increased.
FY10-11 Projection: 25% reduction of PEEF funding is affecting capacity to offer these services.
1b:
Additional measure info: Number of students served by PEEF funded Peer Resources across all school sites, either through direct services or that
participate in conflict mediation, Site Based Workshops, Peer Education, and Special Projects.
Data source: Peer Resources records; student roster and weekly tracking logs.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Due to school site funding shifts Peer Resources closed large programs at Aptos Middle and
Burton High Schools late in the early fall. These programs were replaced by increased services at high need but
smaller middle schools (Lick, WIllie Brown, Martin Luther King). A new program was also opened at Marshall High
School that did not get started until the second semester.
FY10-11 Projection: The 25% budget reduction is expected to affect number of students served.
1c:
Additional measure info: Last year, conflict mediation was reported as part of a more comprehensive measure. From now on, conflict mediation will
be reported as a separate measure.
Data source: Peer resources records; student roster and weekly tracking logs.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Due to PEEF budget reductions, Peer Resources is operating at fewer Middle School sites (4 less)
which gives fewer students access to conflict mediation
FY10-11 Projection: Due to PEEF budget reductions, Peer Resources is operating at fewer Middle School sites,
which gives fewer students access to conflict mediation.
1d:
Data source: Annual Peer Resources survey.
Significant changes: None.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 31 of 56
Peer Resources: Goal 2: Increase student confidence in their ability to make a difference in their community.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06
2006-07 857
2007-08 782
2008-09 750 728
2009-10 750 740 634
2010-11 750 650
2011-12 600
2b. 2005-06
2006-07 52%
2007-08 50%
2008-09 49% 53%
2009-10 50% 50% 54%
2010-11 55% 54%
2011-12 54%
2c. 2005-06
2006-07 43%
2007-08 45%
2008-09 43%
2009-10 43% 44%
2010-11 40% 44%
2011-12 44%
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
2a:
Data source: Peer resources records; student roster and weekly tracking logs.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Due to the PEEF budget reductions, the capacity of the peer leader program was reduced.
FY11-12 Target: The Peer Resources Department is anticipating to have slight changes in the program capacity as the school
sites try to keep peers programs by having the staff manage other Student Support roles (i.e. health programs). This will
mean that in some schools they may have one fewer class of peer resources.
2b.
Data source: Annual Peer Resources survey.
Significant changes: None.
2c.
Data source: Annual Peer Resources survey.
Significant changes: None.
Percentage of students who, after participating in Peer
Resources, report increased ability to make a difference
in their community.
Number of peer leaders.
Percentage of students who, after participating in Peer
Resources, report increased Leadership Skills.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 32 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund -Other General Uses
Student Wellness: Goal 1: Increase youth awareness of, and access to adolescent health services.*
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 9,817
2008-09 10,000 16,478
2009-10 12,000 16,500 19,163
2010-11 17,000 17,000
2011-12 18,000
1b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 87%
2008-09 N/A N/A
2009-10 87% 87% 88%
2010-11 N/A N/A
2011-12 88%
1c. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 94%
2008-09 N/A N/A
2009-10 94% 94% 95%
2010-11 N/A N/A
2011-12 95%
1d. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 92%
2008-09 N/A N/A
2009-10 92% 92% 93%
2010-11 N/A N/A
2011-12 93%
Student Wellness Performance Measures
Number of student contacts at the PEEF funded Wellness
centers.
Percent of students who report learning information
about how to improve their health and well-being.
Among the students who reported learning information
about how to improve their health and well-being,
percent who planned to take steps to improve their
health.
Among the students who reported learning the
information about how to improve their health and well-
being and planned to improve their health, percent who
reported having taken steps to improve their health.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 33 of 56
Student Wellness: Goal 1: Increase youth awareness of, and access to adolescent health services.*
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Additional measure info: Students who visit the Wellness Center at the school site for a brief, non-clinical consultation.
Data source: Student Wellness records at each school site. Up until FY08-09 the Wellness program at each school site counted every
student who came in for a brief contact. Starting in FY08-09, the tracking procedure changed. It is now based on a biannual
time study of a week in October and a week in March. Average daily visits is multiplied by number of days in the
school year. The estimation method is expected to be a more reliable measure than the previous count, since the staff
does not have capacity to keep precise track of visits all year.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: More students dropped in for services than expected. This was the third year the Wellness program was
implemented at the schools. For each year the program gets more integrated at the school site, and more students are
aware of and utilize the services.
FY10-11 Projection: Newcomer High School was closed at year's end 2009-10. Replacement services have been
introduced at SF. International High School, but the Wellness Initiative is anticipating that it will take will take 1-3 years
before students will be visiting the center at the same rate as at other Wellness centers.
1b:
Data source: Biennial Wellness Student Satisfaction Survey (with data only collected in 07-08, 09-10, & 11-12).
Only students who receive five or more individual sessions of in-depth Wellness services are surveyed.
Significant changes: None.
1c:
Data source: Biennial Wellness Student Satisfaction Survey (with data only collected in 07-08, 09-10, & 11-12).
Only students who receive five or more individual sessions of in-depth Wellness services are surveyed.
Significant changes: None.
1d:
Data source: Biennial Wellness Student Satisfaction Survey (with data only collected in 07-08, 09-10, & 11-12).
Only students who receive five or more individual sessions of in-depth Wellness services are surveyed.
Significant changes: None.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 34 of 56
Student Wellness: Goal 2: Increase youth utilization of adolescent health services.*
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 1,041
2008-09 1,200 1,301
2009-10 1,400 1,170 1,330
2010-11 1,275 1,220
2011-12 1,300
2b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 83%
2008-09 N/A N/A
2009-10 83% 83% 83%
2010-11 N/A N/A
2011-12 83%
2c. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 61%
2008-09 N/A N/A
2009-10 61% 61% 72%
2010-11 N/A N/A
2011-12 72%
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
2a:
Additional measure info: Only in-depth services that include individual or group service from a social worker, nurse, behavioral health counselor,
or a community health outreach worker are recorded for non-duplicated students.
Data source: Student Wellness records at each school site.
Significant changes: FY10-11 Projection: The Wellness Initiative is expecting number of students utilizing services to drop because of reduced
enrollment in High Schools. The newly established program at S.F. International will also serve fewer students because
it will take a while before the program is well-established.
2b:
Data source: Biennial Wellness Student Satisfaction (with data only collected in 07-08, 09-10, & 11-12).
Only students who receive five or more individual sessions of in-depth Wellness services are surveyed.
Significant changes: None.
2c:
Data source: Biennial Wellness Student Satisfaction Survey (with data only collected in 07-08, 09-10, & 11-12).
Only students who receive five or more individual sessions of in-depth Wellness services are surveyed.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: An increasing percentage of students is going to community organizations or clinics. This can be
a result of the level of implementation and integration of the Wellness centers at the school sites.
*The goal was revised and divided into two goals.
N/A = Data not available.
Percentage of Wellness clients who report learning about
organizations and clinics in the community they can go
to for the help they need.
Among the students who reported learning about
community organizations and clinics, percent who
reported actually going to a community organization or
clinic.
Number of students utilizing Wellness services at the
PEEF funded sites.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 35 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Other General Uses
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
new measure 2008-09
2009-10
2010-11 400
2011-12 1,000
1b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
new measure 2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
Additional measure information, data source, significant changes.
1a:
Additional measure info: Restorative justice training was initiated in 2010-11. For the current school year, the goal is to have all centralized and
site-based student support personnel trained in restorative practices. Training may be extended to teachers if capacity.
For the 2011-12 school year, training will be extended to teachers. Additionally, personnel trained in 2010-11 will receive
further, and more extensive, training.
Data source: Restorative justice records.
Significant changes: N/A.
1b:
Additional measure info: The Safer Saner School program is a 2 year professional development program and coaching model utilizing restorative
practices to create a positive school culture. In the spring of 2011, 2-3 schools will be identified and chosen for this program.
Staff will start implementing the practices in the 2011-12 school year.
Data source: Annual survey.
Significant changes: N/A.
Restorative Justice
Restorative Justice: Goal 1: Building and maintaining strong relationships, community, and positive school climate.
Percentage of students who agree or strongly agree that
the school climate at their school is more positive after
the implementation of the Safer Saner School program at
their site.
Number and Percentage of school-site and centralized
staff receiving introductory or advanced training in
restorative practices as alternative methods of
discipline.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 36 of 56
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06 3,295 (5.71%)
2006-07 3,743 (6.57%)
2007-08 4,128 (7.41%)
new measure 2008-09 3,578 (6.76%)
2009-10 3,098 (5.81%)
2010-11 2850
2011-12 2350
2b. 2005-06 1,758 (53.4%)
2006-07 1,827 (48.8%)
2007-08 1,966 (47.6%)
new measure 2008-09 1,791 (50.1%)
2009-10 1,401 (45.2%)
2010-11 1300
2011-12 925
2c. 2005-06 707 (21.5%)
2006-07 983 (26.3%)
2007-08 1,104 (26.7%)
new measure 2008-09 1,008 (28.2%)
2009-10 890 (28.7%)
2010-11 750
2011-12 525
2d. 2005-06 47
2006-07 58
2007-08 28
new measure 2008-09 63
2009-10 21
2010-11 21
2011-12 20
2e. 2005-06 N/A
2006-07 N/A
2007-08 N/A
new measure 2008-09 N/A
2009-10 86
2010-11 86
2011-12 76
Restorative Justice: Goal 2: Minimize counseling office referrals, suspensions, and expulsions, and increase in-class instructional
time.
Number and percent of referrals for expulsions in SFUSD.
Percent and number of suspended students that are
African American.
Percent and number of suspended students that are
Latino.
Number of students that have been expelled in SFUSD.
Number and percentage of students suspended in SFUSD.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 37 of 56
Restorative Justice: Goal 2: Minimize counseling office referrals, suspensions, and expulsions, and increase in-class instructional
time.
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
2a.
Data source: Suspension forms from school sites, obtained through Pupil Services.
Significant changes: FY10-11 Projection: Restorative Practice training was initiated in December 2010. The program is anticipating a slight
reduction in number of suspensions as a result of the training.
FY11-12 Target: In 2011-12 more staff will receive training. The program is anticipating that this will lead to a further
reduction in number of suspensions.
2b.
Data source: Suspension forms from school sites, obtained through Pupil Services.
Significant changes: FY10-11 Projection: Restorative Practice training was initiated in December 2010. The program is anticipating a slight
reduction in number of suspensions as a result of the training.
FY11-12 Target: In 2011-12 more staff will receive training. The program is anticipating that this will lead to a further
reduction in number of suspensions.
2c.
Data source: Suspension forms from school sites, obtained through Pupil Services.
Significant changes: FY10-11 Projection: Restorative Practice training was initiated in December 2010. The program is anticipating a slight
reduction in number of suspensions as a result of the training.
FY11-12 Target: In 2011-12 more staff will receive training. The program is anticipating that this will lead to a further
reduction in number of suspensions.
2d.
Additional measure info: Number of expulsions approved by the school board.
Data source: Suspension forms from school sites, obtained through Pupil Services.
Significant changes: FY10-11 Projection: The extent to which the Restorative Justice program will be able to effectively reduce the number of
expulsions is currently unclear due to Education Code mandates.
2e.
Additional measure info: Number of expulsion referrals from school sites.
Data source: Suspension forms from school sites, obtained through Pupil Services.
Significant changes: FY11-12 Target: The Restorative Justice program is anticipating that number of office referrals will gradually decrease
and be replaced by Restorative Justice interventions as more staff undergoes training.
N/A = Data not available.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 38 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Other General Uses
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06 0
2006-07 2
2007-08 3
2008-09 10 16
2009-10 30 30 35
2010-11 35 35
2011-12 37
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Data source: City College of San Francisco; course records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The increase in course offerings is due to increased collaboration with the City College of San Francisco.
The teacher on special assignment has been meeting weekly with the college to facilitate collaboration.
* The goal reported Feb. 1st 2010 was revised to better capture the purpose of CTE.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06 3.83%; 737
2006-07 4.43%; 857
2007-08 5.23%; 997
2008-09 1,140 6.08%; 1,140
2009-10 1,299 1,800 11.02%; 1,701
2010-11 2,500 2,000
2011-12 2200
2b. 2005-06 52.3%
2006-07 N/A
2007-08 58%
2008-09 56.6%
2009-10 84.8%
2010-11 85%
2011-12 85%
Additional measure info, data source, and significant changes.
2a:
Data source: Student enrollment numbers.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The actual exceeded the target. Reasons are that 1) Career Technical Education sections were
expanded, 2) the program was opened up to 10th grade students, and 3) a new engineering and information tecnhology
academy was created.
FY10-11 Projection: Student enrollment in the program is anticipated to continue increasing in 2010-11, due to
the expansions initiated in 2009-10.
2b:
Additional measure info: This outcome measure has not previously been reported to the office of the Controller, but has been collected since
2005-06.
Data source: Annual post graduate survey. Previous year's graduates are surveyed in the spring.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The satisfaction rate has increased due to the successful expansion of the program.
* The goal reported Feb. 1st 2010 was revised to better capture the purpose of CTE.
N/A = Data not available.
Percentage of students who found SFUSD Career
Academy, Pathway or CVE helpful or very helpful in
preparing for their success in post secondary education.
Career Technical Education: Goal 2: To increase student enrollment within Career Technical Education programs.*
Percentage and number of high school students enrolled
in career academy/Career Technical Education
programs.
Career Technical Education Performance Measures
Career Tecnnical Education: Goal 1: To increase dual enrollment and capacity at the City College of San Francisco.*
Number of City College of San Francisco course offerings
for 11th and 12th grade students.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 39 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Other General Uses
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 83
2008-09 85
2009-10 167
2010-11 143
2011-12 150
1b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 28
2008-09 42 42
2009-10 45 32 52
2010-11 45 52
2011-12 52
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Data source: Teacher Academy student enrollment.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: While Teacher Academy in previous years has been offered to junior and senior students only, a
sophomore class was added at Lincoln High School in 2009-10. FY10-11 Projection: Projection based on fall 2010 enrollment numbers. Enrollment might be higher in the spring semester.
1b:
Data source: Report from Master Teachers at the two academies.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Increased number of teachers' aides increases the number of classes served.
Teacher Academy Performance Measures
Teacher Academy: Goal 1: To pave a teaching pathway for high school students by providing students with work opportunities as
Teacher Academy aides.*
* Goal was revised to account for changes in the priorities and actual goals of Teacher Academy
Number of Teacher Academy Aides.
Number of classes served by Teacher Academy aides.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 40 of 56
Lincoln High School Thurgood Marshall High School
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
new measure 2008-09 80%
2009-10 98%
2010-11 100% 36%
2011-12 100% 40%
2b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
new measure 2008-09 20%
2009-10 60%
2010-11 60% 20%
2011-12 60% 25%
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
2a:
Additional measure info: The college preparatory program with Teacher Academy for junior and senior students was initiated in 2007-08 at Lincoln
High School. Starting in 2009-10, students could enter the program in their Sophomore year. At Thurgood Marshall,
the college preparatory program with Teacher Academy was initiated in 2010-11.
Data source: Teacher Academy records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual - Lincoln H.S.: The actual increased to 98% in 2009-10 at Lincoln High School. This was the 2nd year of
implementation, which made it possible to more students to attend classes at City College San Francisco
FY10-11 Projection - Marshall H.S.: 2010-11 is the first year the college preparatory program is being implemented at
Thurgood Marshall.
2b:
Data source: Teacher Academy records.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual - Lincoln H.S.: The actual increased to 60% in 2009-10. This was the 2nd year of implementation of
the program at Lincoln, and reflects the success of the program.
Teacher Academy: Goal 2: To pave a teaching pathway for high school students by providing opportunities for college entry*
* Goal was revised to account for changes in the priorities and actual goals of Teacher Academy
Percentage of Teacher Academy students graduating
with 2 college units.
Percentage of Teacher Academy students graduating
with 6 college units.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 41 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Other General Uses
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06 13,763
2006-07 16,432
2007-08 21,649
2008-09 21,005 23,000
2009-10 16,000 16,000 17,543
2010-11 30,000 30,000
2011-12 40,000
1b. 2005-06 N/A
2006-07 N/A
2007-08 750
2008-09 827
2009-10 2,891
2010-11 3,200
2011-12 3,500
1c. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09 3,741
2009-10 72,385
2010-11 100,000
2011-12 125,000
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Data source: DataDirector by student ID number or OARS.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: This was the year DataDirector was introduced, and the dept. focused its efforts on the implementation
of this new system. Furthermore, curricula were changed, which forced the department to develop new assessments.
FY10-11 Projection: The actual for the fall of 2010 is 25.000, and the dept. expects it to reach 30.000 by the end of the
school year. The department has been reaching out to high schools this year and increased number of assessments used there.
FY11-12 Target: For 2011-12, the focus will be on reaching more students at all levels. The department has a whole
range of assessments available for K-12 students.
1b:
Data source: DataDirector.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: DataDirector was introduced in 2009-10. Over the course of the school year, most teachers and principals
were introduced to the system.
FY10-11 Projection and FY11-12 Target: Number of users is expected to continue growing, especially among school site and
district support personnel.
1c:
Data source: DataDirector.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: DataDirector was introduced in 2009-10.
FY10-11 Projection and FY11-12 Target: The dept. is expecting that the number of users of DataDirector will increase in
2010-11, and that users will utilize the system more frequently once they are more familiar with it.
Formative Assessments Performance Measures
Formative Assessment: Goal 1: To provide multiple performance measures and tools for all teachers to inform instruction and for all
learners to demonstrate understanding and to reflect on their own learning.
ES, MS, and HS teachers and principals, and district and
school site support personnel using OARS/DataDirector.
Number of OARS/DataDirector usage/log ins by
elementary, middle and high school teachers and
principals, and district and school site support personnel.
Number of students participating in English Language
Arts, Math, History, and Science common assessments.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 42 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Other General Uses
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06 N/A
2006-07 177
2007-08 307
2008-09 430 430
2009-10 418 560 610
2010-11 560 700
2011-12 700
1b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
new measure 2008-09
2009-10
2010-11 90%
2011-12 95%
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Data source: Sharepoint database. All requests are registered in Sharepoint.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: Actuals exceeded the target for the 2009-10. Positive awareness of the Translation
and Interpretation unit has yielded more requests, and it also reflects greater demand on the department.
1b:
Measure description: The satisfaction survey for requesters of translation services was revised and now contains new survey items. Results from
the new survey will be reported starting spring 2011.
Data source: Satisfaction survey for requesters of translation services. Spring surveys will be administered annually.
Significant changes: N/A.
N/A = Data not available.
Translation and Interpretation Performance Measures
Translation and Interpretation: Goal 1: To provide translation services to increase the participation of Limited English Proficient
parents in their children's education.
Number of translation requests from school sites and
central office fulfilled.
Percent of requesters satisfied or very satisfied with
translation services.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 43 of 56
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06 N/A
2006-07 34
2007-08 154
2008-09 288 288
2009-10 418 418 941
2010-11 750 950
2011-12 950
2b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
new measure 2008-09
2009-10
2010-11 90%
2011-12 95%
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
2a:
Data source: Sharepoint database. All requests are registered in Sharepoint.
Signficant changes: FY09-10 Actual: The number of translation requests keeps increasing every year. Sites are more aware of the
department's services, and their legal responsibilities related to access to information in other languages. The district
continues the implementation of the LAU Action Plan that obligates the district to provide translation and
interpretation services.
2b:
Additional measure info: The interpretation satisfaction survey for parents was revised and now contains new survey items. Results from
the new survey will be reported starting spring 2011.
Data source: Interpretation Satisfaction survey for parents. Spring surveys will be administered annually.
Significant changes: N/A.
N/A = Data not available.
Percent of parents satisfied or very satisfied with
interpretation services.
Number of school and district-wide events that were
interpreted.
Translation and interpretation: Goal 2: To provide interpretation services to increase the participation of Limited English Proficient
parents in their children's education.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 44 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Other General Uses
Custodial Services: Goal 1: To provide additional elementary school custodial staffing support.
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 14
2008-09 14 14
2009-10 14 14 12.5
2010-11 12.5* 12.5
2011-12 12.5
1b. 2005-06
2006-07
new measure 2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11 90%**
2011-12 90%**
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes
1a:
Data source: Custodial Services records
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: 1.5 FTE positions were cut due to 15% reduction of PEEF budget.
1b:
Measure description: The satisfaction survey for custodial services was revised and now contains new survey items. Results from
the new survey will be reported starting spring 2011.
Data source: Custodial services satisfaction survey for principals. Spring surveys will be administered annually.
Significant changes: New survey. Data not available.
Number of elementary schools receiving an additional
0.5 FTE PEEF funded custodian.
*The target for measure 1a for 2010-11 was set to 12.5, but erroneously reported as 14.
Custodial Services Performance Measures
Percentage of ES principals who were satisfied or very
satisfied with the overall cleanliness of their school site.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 45 of 56
Custodial Services: Goal 2: To provide Child Development Centers with deep cleaning twice a year
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
2a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 37
2008-09 37 37
2009-10 37 37 37
2010-11 37 37
2011-12 37
2b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
new measure 2008-09
2009-10
2010-11 90%**
2011-12 90%**
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes
2a:
Data source: Custodial services schedule log.
Significant changes: No significant changes.
2b:
Additional measure info:The satisfaction survey for custodial services was revised and now contains new survey items. Results from
the new survey will be reported starting spring 2011.
Data source: Custodial services satisfaction survey for site managers at Child Development Centers. Survey will be administered annually.
Significant changes: New survey. Data not available.
**Targets and projections based on results from previous years' satisfaction surveys.
Percentage of site managers at Child Development
Centers who were satisfied or very satisfied with the
overall cleanliness at their site.
Number of Child Development Centers receiving deep
cleaning twice a year.
SFUSD PEEF 2011-2012 Expenditure Plan Page 46 of 56
San Francisco Unified School District Public Education Enrichment Fund - Other General Uses
Measure Number Measure Fiscal Year Target Projection Actual
1a. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 90%
2008-09 93%
2009-10 93% 98%
2010-11 94% 98%
2011-12 99%
1b. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 46
2008-09 12 12
2009-10 0 1.8
2010-11 0 0.9
2010-11 0.4
1c. Number of teacher applications submitted to the district. 2005-06
2006-07
2007-08 2,783
2008-09 2,358 2,358
2009-10 2,800 2,800 1,804
2010-11 2,800 2,000
2011-12 2,000
Additional measure information, data source, and significant changes.
1a:
Data source: PeopleSoft; SFUSD Human Resources database.
Significant changes: None.
1b:
Additional measure info: Through 2008-09 the measure shows number of open positions in SFUSD. Starting in 09-10, the measure shows number
of vacant FTEs.
Data source: PeopleSoft; SFUSD HR database.
Significant changes: FY09-10: Number of vacancies on the first day of school has decreased significantly due to a successful partnership with
The New Teacher Project (TNTP),
1c:
Data source: SearchSoft; Online application system for the hiring of certificated teachers.
Significant changes: FY09-10 Actual: In the spring of 2009, SearchSoft, a new, more rigorous teacher application system was implemented in
SFUSD. Only qualified applicants will be able to apply with the new system.
FY10-11 Projection: After the successful implementation of SearchSoft in 2009-10, and with increased recruitment efforts,
the Teacher Recruitment dept. is expecting number of applications to increase.
Teacher Recruitment Performance Measures
Teacher Recruitment: Goal 1: To recruit and hire a highly qualified teaching workforce.
Number of vacancies on the first day of school.
Percentage of newly hired teachers who are highly
qualified according to the No Child Left Behind standards.