second regional workshop on capacity development for the clean development mechanism
DESCRIPTION
Second Regional Workshop on Capacity Development for the Clean Development Mechanism 23 March 2004 Siem Reap, Cambodia GHG Mitigation and CDM Project Pipeline in Cambodia Presented by Thy SUM, Climate Change Office Ministry of Environment, Cambodia. Outline. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Second Regional Workshop on Capacity Development for the Clean Development
Mechanism
23 March 2004 Siem Reap, Cambodia
GHG Mitigation and CDM Project Pipeline in Cambodia
Presented by Thy SUM, Climate Change Office
Ministry of Environment, Cambodia
2
Outline Outline
1.1. Cambodia’s National GHG InventoryCambodia’s National GHG Inventory
2.2. GHG Mitigation AnalysisGHG Mitigation Analysis
3. PIN Angkor Prosperous Rice Mill
4. PIN Koh Kong Mini-Hydro Bundling
5. Summary
3
I. Cambodia’s National GHG Inventory (1)
Base year (1994) Based on the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines Activity Data: some are available from
concerned ministries/agencies Emission Factors: default data presented in
the IPCC Guidelines were used mainly Greenhouse gases (GHGs): carbon dioxide
(CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) Major sectors: Energy, Industrial Processes,
Agriculture, Waste, and LUCF.
4
I. Cmbodia’s National GHG Inventory (2)
CO2 CH4 N2O NOx CO
ENERGY 1,272.08 24.13 0.33 16.69 456.56
INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES 49.85 0.01 0.03
AGRICULTURE 339.25 11.08 2.7 95.76
WASTE 6.77 0.42
LAND USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY 64,850.23 45,214.27 74.77 0.51 18.58 654.2
TOTAL NAT'L GHG EMISSIONS/UPTAKE 64,850.23 46,536.20 444.92 12.35 37.98 1,206.55
Sectors and SinksEmission
CO2 uptake
Summary of 1994 GHG inventory
5
I. Cambodia’s National GHG Inventory (3)
Figure 1: Share of the Three Main GHGs; (b) Total CO2
Equivalent Emissions by Sectors
LUCF79%
Energy3% Agriculture
18%
Waste0%
Industry0%
N2O 8%
CH4 18%
CO2 74%
(a) (b)
6
I. Cambodia’s National GHG Inventory (4)
A B C D E F
IPCC Source CategoriesDirectGHG
Base Year(Gg CO2
Eqv.)
CurentYear
Estimate
LevelAssess
ment
Cummulativetotal of
Column E
CH4 Emission from Enteric fermentation in Domestic Livestock CH4 3417.69 0.27 0.27
CH4 Emission from Rice Production CH4 3158.36 0.25 0.52
Direct N2O Emission from Agricultural Soils N2O 2097.39 0.16 0.68
N2O Emission from Manure Management N2O 1203.55 0.09 0.77
Mobile Combustion: Road Vehicle, Railway and Other CO2 757.77 0.06 0.83
CH4 Emission from Sationay Combustion CH4 503.83 0.04 0.87
CH4 Emission from Manure Management CH4 462.84 0.04 0.91
CO2 Emission from Stationary Combustion CO2 446.83 0.04 0.94
N2O Emission from Wasterwater Handling N2O 131.16 0.01 0.95
CH4 Emission from Solid Waste Disposal Sites CH4 123.96 0.01 0.96
Direct N2O Emission from Nitrogen Used in Agriculture N2O 111.82 0.01 0.97
N2O Emission from Stationary Combustion N2O 100.05 0.01 0.98
Mobile Combustion: Aircraft CO2 51.32 0.00 0.98
CO2 Emission from Cement Production CO2 49.85 0.00 0.99
Tier 1 Analysis-Level Assessment (Cambodia Inventory)
Cambodia’s GHG key source categories (excluding LULUCF)
7
II. GHG Mitigation Analysis (1)
Option studied*:Option studied*:
Combined cycle gas turbine
Hydropower
Phnom Penh city shuttles
Improve cook stove
Compact fluorescent
Mass transit for rural areas*These options were assessed by government staff conducting the National Communication and not by project developers.
Energy Sector
8
II. GHG Mitigation Analysis (2)
Summary of GHG reduction (based on LEAP modeling)
Mitigation Option CO2-Eqv. Reduction (Gg)
% Reduction (CO2 Eqv.)
Combined Cycle Gas Turbine
19980 33.5
Improved Cook Stove 13060 21.9
Hydropower 12390 20.8
Compact Fluorescent Lamp 7320 12.3
Phnom Penh City Shutles 2300 3.8
Mass Transit (Rural) 4600 7.7
Total GHG Reduction 59650 100
9
II. GHG Mitigation Analysis (3)
In this study, mitigation options being evaluated were Forest protection (FP) Reforestation with sort rotation (RSR) Reforestation long rotation (RLR) Reforestation without rotation using fast
(RFG) species, and Reforestation without rotation slow growing
species (RLG)
Forestry Sector
10
II. GHG Mitigation Analysis (4)
Comparison of the five mitigation options
$/tC $/ha $/tC $/ha $/tC $/haRLR 120 0.29 35.4 0.41 48.8 0.05 6.0RSR 43 1.10 47.2 1.78 76.2 6.12 199.8RLG 141 0.18 25.4 0.28 39.2 -0.26 -36.4RFG 92 0.28 25.4 0.43 39.2 -0.32 -29.1FP 137 0.02 2.5 0.51 70.0 -0.77 -105.7
Initial cost PV of cost NPV of benefit
Mitigation Option
Mitigation potential (tC/ha)
11
II. GHG Mitigation Analysis (5)
Agriculture Sector
The mitigation options evaluated for the agriculture sector only covered rice paddies:
Intermittent irrigation applied to dry season rice Direct seeded applied in both dry and wet seasons Organic matter management applied for both seasons; and Zero tillage applied in both seasons.
III. PIN Angkor Prosperous Rice Mill (1)
13
III. PIN Angkor Prosperous Rice Mill (2)
Objectives of the project
Production of electricity and heat using rice husk for internal consumption by the mill
Project description and proposed activities
1.5 MWe rice husk fired cogeneration plant Replacement of currently used diesel generators
Technologies to be employed
Traveling grate boiler with 75% rated efficiency Steam impulse turbines
Project Description
14
III. PIN Angkor Prosperous Rice Mill (3)
Project Developer
Angkor Prosperous Rice Mill
Project Sponsors EC-Cogen 3 (15% discount from EC suppliers of equipment)Searching for other sponsors
Greenhouse gases targeted
CO2 only. CH4 from burning of rice husk is not claimed.
Location of the projects
Kandal Province, 23 km south of Phnom Penh
Expected Schedule
Project start dateProject lifetime
?20 years
15
III. PIN Angkor Prosperous Rice Mill(4)
Estimate of Greenhouse Gases abated (tons of CO2 equivalent)
Annual: 10.8 kT CO2eOver crediting period of 21 years: 226 kT CO2eCalculations based on:
CO2 from biomass residues considered carbon neutral (IPCC) 12 GWh annual electric output of project 0.9 kg CO2e/kWh emission rate (diesel generation units displaced by project) (12 x 1000) MWh x 0.9 t CO2e/MWh = 10.8 kT CO2e
Baseline scenario
Replacement of in-house diesel generation units Difficulties in securing financing
Social and Environmental Benefits
16
III. PIN Angkor Prosperous Rice Mill (5)
Specific global & local environmental benefits
greenhouse gas emission reductions sale of ashes as natural fertiliser
Socio-economic aspects
Angkor Prosperous specialises in high quality organic rice varieties. The use of ashes as fertilisers within its network of organic farmers will contribute to increasing their productivity. Rice husk may be used as cooking fuel by rural people and cottage industries. There may be negative social impacts.
17
III. PIN Angkor Prosperous Rice Mill (6)
Total project cost estimates US$ 4.1 million
Sources of financing EC rebate on European equipment (about US $300,000) some 90% not yet secured
Revenues from Certified Emission Reductions
AnnualOver 10 years
Over 21 years
US $54,000 (at US $5 per t CO2)US $540,000US $1,134,000
Forecasted Financial Internal Rate of Return* (without CER revenues – Discount rate 15%)*Analysis undertaken by EC Cogen3
21.46 %
Finance
IV. PIN Koh Kong Mini-Hydro Bundling (1)
Based on Projects identified in
Mini-Hydropower Study by Meritech Ltd
19
IV. PIN Koh Kong Mini-Hydro Bundling (2)
Objectives of the project
Production of electricity from hydro resources in SW Cambodia to feed Phnom Penh electricity grid.
Project description and proposed activities
Bundling 4 mini-hydro projects 12.3MW total installed capacity
4.2MW - P. Batau; 3.1MW - O Sla3MW P. Tunsang upstream; 2MW downstream
Generating 61.7GWh/an Located within 20km radius, feeding into existing 115kV transmission line Displacement of currently used oil and diesel electricity generation in Phnom Penh
Technologies to be employed
Francis turbine generating units
Project Description
20
IV. PIN Koh Kong Mini-Hydro Bundling (3)
Project Developer
Searching for Project Developer Pre-feasibility/investment study completed
Project Sponsors Searching for Project Sponsors
Greenhouse gases targeted
CO2 only
Location of the projects
Koh Kong Province (~140KM SW Phnom Penh)
Expected Schedule
Project start date
Devel/Const
Project lifetime
?3 years30 years
21
IV. PIN Koh Kong Mini-Hydro Bundling (4)
Estimate of Greenhouse Gases abated (tons of CO2 equivalent)
Annual: 47.8 kT CO2e
Over crediting period of 10 years: 478 kT CO2e
Over crediting period of 21 years: 1,004 kT CO2e
Calculations based on: 61.7 GWh annual electric output of project .775 kg CO2e/kWh emission rate (weighted average emission factor of Phnom Penh electricity grid) (61.7 x 1000) MWh x .78 t CO2e/MWh =47.8 kTCO2e
Baseline scenario
Small Scale Methodology – weighted average emissions of Phnom Penh electricity grid. Barrier - Difficulties in attracting developers and financing
Social and Environmental Benefits
22
IV. PIN Koh Kong Mini-Hydro Bundling (5)
Specific global & local environmental benefits & impacts
greenhouse gas emission reductions reduction in air pollution from old fossil fuel generation units reduction in transportation fossil fuels small diversion of river changing flow regime located in areas of secondary forests within protected area
Socio-economic aspects
reduction of fossil fuel imports provision electricity increase reliability and decrease cost (can improve health facilities, education, potential for improved industry development)
23
IV. PIN Koh Kong Mini-Hydro Bundling (6)
Total project cost estimates Total US$18.1m US$6.0m – P. Batau*US$3.4m – O Sla*US$4.3m P. Tunsang
upstream+
US$4.4m P. Tunsang dnstream+
Sources of financing Not yet secured
Revenues from CERsAnnualOver 10 years
Over 21 years
US $239k (at US $5 per t CO2e)US $2.39mUS $5m
Forecasted Financial Internal Rate of Return*Discount rate 10%; *Analysis by Meritech Ltd
32.4% - P. Batau27.7% - O Sla +assumption based on MW cost for
P.Batau
Finance
24
V. Summary
Cambodia’s GHG Inventory identified that LULUCF is the greatest contributor to the total GHG emission/uptake
Of non-LULUCF sectors; the main sources of GHGs are from agriculture, energy and waste activities
Eligible CDM agriculture activities are difficult and not yet assessed for CDM potential
Energy and waste projects more focus for CDM in Cambodia
Limited investors and project developers for CDM; limited identification of potential CDM projects
Plenty of ‘barriers’ to verify additionality!