scaling back on international assignments: work and family...
TRANSCRIPT
Scaling Back on International Assignments: Work and Family Matter
Min Wan, Doctoral Student
Romila Singh, Ph.D.
Margaret Shaffer, Ph.D.
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Janice Joplin, Ph.D.
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville
Work and Family Researchers Network Conference
New York City
June 2014
Expatriate failure
Generally 4%-6% of all international assignments fail in any given year (Brookfield,2012)
The cost of a single failed expatriate assignment ranges between $250,000 and $1,000,000 (Vogel, Van Vuuren & Millard,2008)
A critical and broader window in understanding the phenomenon of expatriate failure is necessary (Shaffer & Harrison, 1998)
Psychological work withdrawal The withholding of work efforts for a period of time (Hanisch, 2002)
Represents a less drastic and (possibly less) irreversible form of coping with aversive work conditions or assignment stresses
Introduction
Examine how work and family factors trigger expatriate psychological work withdrawal
Uncover the role of work-family conflict as a possible intervening mechanism that links work and family demands with expatriate psychological work withdrawal
Research Purposes
Theoretical foundations Stressor-Strain Paradigm (Schaubroeck, Cotton, & Jennings, 1989)
Conservation of Resources Theory (Hobfoll,1989)
Spillover Theory (Edwards & Rothbard,2000)
Constructs Psychological work withdrawal (Hanisch,2002)
Work demands (i.e., Travel commitment, time stress, and work maladjustment)
Family demands (i.e., Childcare hours, parental demands, and spouse maladjustment)
Work-family conflict (Greenhaus & Beutell, 1985)
Theoretical Foundations & Constructs
Hypothesized Model
Work demands Travel commitment Time stress Work maladjustment
Family demands Childcare hours Parental demands Family maladjustment
WIF
FIW
Psychological work withdrawal
Main effects:
Mediating effects:
Main Effects
Work demands Travel commitment Time stress Work maladjustment
Family demands Childcare hours Parental demands Family maladjustment
WIF
FIW
Psychological work withdrawal
H1a-c: Work demands in the form of (a) travel commitment, (b) time stress and (c)work maladjustment will have a positive influence on WIF. H2a-c: Family demands in the form of (a) time commitment to childcare, (b) parental demands and (c) spouse maladjustment will have a positive influence on FIW. H3a-b: Both (a) WIF and (b) FIW will have a positive influence on expatriate psychological work withdrawal.
Mediating Effects (1)
Work demands Travel commitment Time stress Work maladjustment
Family demands Childcare hours Parental demands Family maladjustment
WIF
FIW
Psychological work withdrawal
H 4-a: WIF will mediate the relationship between work demands and psychological work withdrawal. H4-b: FIW will mediate the relationship between family demands and psychological work withdrawal.
Mediating Effects (2)
WIF
FIW
Psychological work withdrawal
H 5-a: FIW will mediate the relationship between WIF and psychological work withdrawal. H5-b: WIF will mediate the relationship between FIW and psychological work withdrawal.
Mediating Effects (3)
Work demands Travel commitment Time stress Work maladjustment
Family demands Childcare hours Parental demands Family maladjustment
WIF
FIW
Psychological work withdrawal
H 6-a: WIF and FIW will sequentially mediate the relationships between work demands and psychological work withdrawal following the path: Work Demands->WIF->FIW->Psychological Work Withdrawal. H6-b: WIF and FIW will sequentially mediate the relationships between family demands and psychological work withdrawal following the path: Family Demands->FIW->WIF->Psychological Work Withdrawal.
Sample
Random sample of members (121) and their spouses (79) of social organizations for expatriates in Hong Kong
92% were males
Average age was 45
78 % had at least a bachelor’s degree
Expatriates had a median of one child on assignment
Established and validated measures used
Controls: Age, working hours, and cultural novelty
Sample & Measures
Table 1: Results (Main Effects)
WIF (S)WIF FIW Psych. work withdrawal
Work demands
Travel commitment .21** .19* -.03
Time stress .43*** .32** .14
Work maladjustment .19* .01 .27**
Family demands
Childcare hours .23* .27*
Parental demands - .00 -.13
Spouse maladjustment .33*** .19*
Work-family conflict
WIF -.03
FIW .48***
Table 2: Results (Mediating Effects)
Main effects on Psych. work withdrawal
Main effects of WFC on Psych. work
withdrawal
Mediated effects
Work demands
Travel commitment -.03 -.08
Time stress .14 .03
Work maladjustment .27** .25**
Family demands
Childcare hours .27* .16
Parental demands -.13 -.09
Spouse maladjustment .19* .05
Mediators
WIF .26* .21
FIW .47*** .43***
Table 3: Results (Mediating Effects)
Main effect on Psych. work withdrawal
Main effect of WFC on Psych. work
withdrawal
Mediated effects
Work domain
WIF .26* -.03
Mediator
FIW .47*** .48***
Family domain
FIW .47*** .48***
Mediator
WIF .26* .03
Table 4: Results (Sequentially Mediating Effects)
Work demands Travel commitment Time stress Work maladjustment
Family demands Childcare hours Parental demands Family maladjustment
WIF
FIW
Psychological work withdrawal
H 6-a: WIF and FIW will sequentially mediate the relationships between work demands and psychological work withdrawal following the path: Work Demands->WIF->FIW->Psychological Work Withdrawal (Supported). H6-b: WIF and FIW will sequentially mediate the relationships between family demands and psychological work withdrawal following the path: Family Demands->FIW->WIF->Psychological Work Withdrawal (Not supported).
Domain specific work and family demands influence WIF and FIW respectively
FIW is positively related to psychological work withdrawal
FIW mediates the relationship between family demands (i.e., childcare hours and spouse maladjustment) and psychological work withdrawal
WIF and FIW sequentially mediate work demands (i.e., travel commitment, time stress, and work maladjustment) and psychological work withdrawal
Discussion
Domain specific demands and work-family conflict explain the phenomenon of expatriate psychological work withdrawal
FIW is more influential than WIF in explaining the relationship between family demands and expatriate psychological work withdrawal
WIF and FIW provide a sequential mediated pathway from work demands to expatriate psychological work withdrawal
Contributions
Table 4: Sequentially Mediating Effects
Effect SE BC CI (Lower) BC CI (Higher)
Travel commitment->WIF->FIW->Psych. work withdrawal
.0039 .0019 .0012 .0089
Time stress ->WIF->FIW->Psych. work withdrawal
.0506 .0185 .0245 .1047
Work maladjustment-
>WIF->FIW->Psych. work withdrawal
.0263 .0136 .0666 .0067
Psychological work withdrawal (Price & Harrison, 1993)
Work-family conflict (Carlson, Kacmar,& Williams,2000)
Work demands Travel commitment - Average number of days each month for travel on business
Time stress (Matteson & Ivancevich, 1987)
Work maladjustment (Black & Stephens ,1989)
Family demands Childcare hours - Number of hours spending on caring for children
Parental demands - Number and age of children (Bedeian, Burke, & Moffett , 1998)
Spouse maladjustment (Shaffer & Harrison, 2001)
Measurement