satellite ocean color remote sensing and its applications ......menghua wang, noaa/nesdis/star...
TRANSCRIPT
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Satellite Ocean Color Remote Sensing and Its Applications for Marine Air Quality Modeling
Menghua Wang1, Daniel Tong2, Xiaoming Liu1, & Kent Hughes1
1NOAA/NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20746, USA
2NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) Silver Spring, MD 20910
The 3rd International Workshop on Air Quality Forecasting Research Bolger Center, Potomac, Maryland, November 29-December 1, 2011
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Chesapeake Bay Lake Taihu 2
Ocean Color Spectra
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Sensor-Measured
Blue ocean
“Green” ocean
From H. Gordon
Atmospheric Correction (removing >90% sensor-measured signals) Calibration (0.5% error in TOA >>>> 5% in surface) 3
Ocean Color Remote Sensing
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
At satellite altitude ~90% of sensor-measured signal over ocean
comes from the atmosphere & surface!
• It is crucial to have accurate atmospheric correction and sensor calibrations.
• 0.5% error in atmospheric correction or calibration corresponds to possible of ~5% error in the derived ocean water-leaving radiance.
• We need ~0.1% sensor calibration accuracy.
4
SeaWiFS (1997-2010): Sea-Viewing Wide Field-of-View Sensor MODIS (1999-, 2002-present): Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Ocean Color Remote Sensing: Derive the ocean water-leaving radiance spectra by accurately removing the atmospheric and surface effects.
Ocean properties: e.g., chlorophyll-a concentration, diffuse attenuation coefficient at 490 nm, can be derived from the ocean water-leaving radiance spectra.
5
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
nLw(443) Scale: 0.-3.0
(mW/cm2 µm sr)
Wang, M., S. Son, and W. Shi (2009), “Evaluation of MODIS SWIR and NIR-SWIR atmospheric correction algorithms using SeaBASS data,” Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 635-644.
July, 2005 NIR-SWIR Data
Processing
July, 2005 NIR-SWIR Data
Processing
Chlorophyll-a 0.01-10 (mg/m3)
(Log scale)
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
SeaWiFS experiences demonstrate that the atmospheric correction works well in the open oceans.
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4
412 nm443 nm490 nm510 nm555 nm
[Lw(λ
)] N (S
eaW
iFS
)
[Lw(λ)]
N (In situ Data)
[Lw(λ)]N Unit: (mW/cm2 µm sr)Slope = 0.9924, Intercept = 0.0536, R = 0.9478
555 nm
510 nm
7 Water-leaving Radiance
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
SeaWiFS Chlorophyll-a Concentration (October 1997-December 2003)
8
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Chl
-a (S
eaW
iFS
)
Chl-a (In Situ Data)
Chlorophyll-a Unit: (mg/m 3)Slope = 0.9357, Intercept = 0.0129, R = 0.9225
SeaWiFS Chlorophyll-a Comparison
9
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Global Kd(490) (Turbidity) Seasonal Maps (2005)
(Shi and Wang, 2009)
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Validation Results for MODIS-derived Kd(490)
0.01
0.1
1
10
0.01 0.1 1 10
MO
DIS
Kd(
490)
(m-1
)
In Situ Kd(490) (m-1)
New ApproachNOMAD In Situ DataMODIS SWIR Derived R(667) for K d(490)
1:1 Mueller (2000) Model
Blended Model
New Model
(a)
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
0.01
0.1
1
10
0.01 0.1 1 10
MO
DIS
nLw
(λ)
(mW
cm-2
µm
-1 s
r-1)
In Situ nLw(λ) (mW cm-2 µm-1 sr-1)
Chesapeake Bay Regionλ = 412 nm
(a)Mean Ratio = 1.29
0.01
0.1
1
10
0.01 0.1 1 10
In Situ nLw(λ) (mW cm-2 µm-1 sr-1)
Chesapeake Bay Regionλ = 443 nm
(b)Mean Ratio = 1.09
0.01
0.1
1
10
0.01 0.1 1 10
MO
DIS
nLw
(λ)
(mW
cm-2
µm
-1 s
r-1)
In Situ nLw(λ) (mW cm-2 µm-1 sr-1)
Chesapeake Bay Regionλ = 488 nm
(c)Mean Ratio = 1.00
0.01
0.1
1
10
0.01 0.1 1 10
In Situ nLw(λ) (mW cm-2 µm-1 sr-1)
Chesapeake Bay Regionλ = 531 nm
(d)Mean Ratio = 0.95
Results from MODIS-Aqua Measurements
(Chesapeake Bay)
1
10
100
1 10 100
MO
DIS
TS
S (m
g l-1
)
In Situ TSS (mg l-1)
(b)Number of Data = 647
Mean Ratio = 1.06Median Ratio = 0.97STD = 0.48
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Results from MODIS-Aqua Measurements (China East Coast)
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
400 500 600 700 800 500 600 700 800 900
In Situ DataMODIS-Aqua
Ref
lect
ance
[ρ
w(λ
)] N
Wavelength (nm)
September 23, 2003 (d)(122.2oE, 30.5oN) Time Diff: -0.4 hrs
(122.3oE, 31.5oN)Time Diff: 2.2 hrs
China East Coast
September 25, 2003
θ0 = 33.8o, θ = 54.7o
θ0 = 33.1o, θ = 43.8o
(c)
Lake Taihu
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
400 500 600 700 800 500 600 700 800 900
In Situ DataMODIS-Aqua
Ref
lect
ance
[ρ w
(λ)] N
Wavelength (nm)
April 5, 2003
θ0 = 31.2o, θ = 1.7o
(b)(123.0oE, 33.0oN) Time Diff: 2.5 hrs
(120.5oE, 36.0oN)Time Diff: 4.2 hrs
China East Coast
March 22, 2003
θ0 = 36.7o, θ = 35.5o
(a)
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Blue-Green Algae (Microcystis) Bloom Crisis in Lake Taihu (Spring 2007)
14
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR (Wang and Shi, 2008)
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
0.1
1
March 21 April 10 April 30 May 20 June 9
Chl
orop
hyll-
a (m
g m
-3)
nLw(λ) (mW
/cm2 µm
sr)
50
8
3
10
Normalized Water-leaving Radiance at 443 nm
Chlorophyll-a
Date (2007)
Bloom Location
Central Lake
Time Series of Chlorophyll-a (index) and nLw(443) at Wuxi Station (bloom) and Central Lake (non-bloom)
16
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Satellite-measured ocean color products have been used for various applications and studies. In particular, satellite-measured chlorophyll-a
concentration and diffuse attenuation coefficient at 490 nm (Kd(490)) data are used for a case study in producing Marine Isoprene Emission product.
17
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Air Resources Laboratory 18
Why is Isoprene Important? Purpose of emission: combat abiotic stresses;
(Lerdau, Science, 2007)
Ozone formation:
Aerosol formation:
Cloud formation: Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN); Ozone, Aerosol, cloudiness all at the central stage
of climate change debate
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Air Resources Laboratory 19
Marine Isoprene: A Historic Review Pioneer studies on DMS (DiMthylSulfur) oxidation as source of cloud
condensation nuclei by Shaw (1983) and Charlson et al. (1984);
Isoprene emission estimation from land by Guenther et al. (1995);
Laboratory studies on isoprene emissions from ocean (phytoplankton and seaweed), with all species tested having this capacity (Bonsang et al., 1992; Ratte et a., 1998; Shaw et al., 2003; Broadgate et al., 2004);
Algorithm to distinguish phytoplankton species using global SeaWiFS imagery (Alvain et al., 2005).
Global marine isoprene fluxes quantified using MODIS chlorophyll data (Palmer and Shaw, 2005); (one emission factor for all);
Observed relationship between phytoplankton and cloudiness in the Southern Ocean (Meskhidze et al., 2006);
New emission factors and algorithm of marine isoprene based on redesigned lab culture results (Gantt et al., 2009).
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR 12/21/2011 Air Resources Laboratory 20 More details at http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/mmb/aq/AQChangelogOE.html
Anthropogenic Emission: Area, mobile, and point emissions based on EPA NEI 2005
Natural Emission: Biogenic emissions by BEIS 3.14 and USGS LULC data; Sea-salt emissions along coast lines;
A Case Study: Hawaii Air Quality Forecast
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Approaches for Estimating Marine Isoprene Emissions
Air Resources Laboratory 21
Shaw et al. (2003):
EFVaChlEiso **][ −=
Palmer & Shaw (2005):
)*(* AWASiso CHCKE −=
0)/*( =−++− MIXMLASbioXiiW LZkkCkCP
Gantt et al. (2009):
∫−=max
0max **][**H
isoiso PdhFaChlHSAE
Eiso - Isoprene emission;
[Chl-a] - Chlorophyll-a;
V – euphotic water volume;
EF – Emission factor;
kAS – exchange coeff.;
CW – isop. conc. in water
H – Henry’s law constant;
CA – isop. conc. in the air
P – isoprene production;
Hmax – euphotic zone height;
ZML – mixing layer height;
ki – chemical reaction rate for oxidant i; kbio – bacterial loss rate; LMIX – loss due to downward mixing;
CXi – concentration of oxidants Xi;
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Estimating Marine Isoprene Emissions
Air Resources Laboratory 22
)*(* AWASiso CHCKE −=
Overall emission flux into the atmosphere (Palmer and Shaw, 2005):
WASiso CKE *=
Determine CW:
∑ ++−
=MLASBIOLXii
MIXW ZkkCk
LPC/ ∑
∫++
−=
max
max
0
2
/
)ln(*
HkkCk
LdhPAREFC
ASBIOLXii
MIX
H
W
(Palmer and Shaw, 2005) (Revised based on Gantt et al. (2009)
Derive Hmax: )/)5.2ln((max 4900
KI
H −= (Gantt et al. 2009)
I0 – ground radiatioin; K490 – diffuse attenuation coefficient in water
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR 23
Chlorophyll-a and Kd(490) Sensor/Satellite: Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on Aqua Data Processing Levels (NOAA CoastWatch http://coastwatch.noaa.gov): - Level 1: NOAA obtains data from NASA GSFC in 5-minute granules, and process to
geolocated, calibrated radiances - Level 2: Processed to derived MODIS data products (Chl-a, Kd(490), nLw, etc.) - Level 3: Products are mapped to the CoastWatch geographic regions Algorithms:
– Chlorophyll-a concentration: OC3 Algorithm (an empirical algorithm) – Diffuse attenuation coefficient at 490 nm (Kd(490)): NASA-OBPG KD2 algorithm (http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/ANALYSIS/kdv4/)
Chlorophyll-a Kd(490)
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Terrestrial vs. Marine Isoprene Emissions
Air Resources Laboratory 24
Land Emission
Marine Emission
(Preliminary Results)
Monthly [Chl-a] and K490;
K490 cut-off (= 0.016);
Hourly ground radiation (I0);
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Satellite-measured ocean color products can provide global ocean water optical, biological, and biogeochemical properties.
Both SeaWiFS and MODIS have been providing high quality ocean color products in the global open oceans.
A new method in the data processing using the shortwave infrared (SWIR) bands has been developed for providing good quality water property data for coastal and inland turbid waters.
Preliminary results from satellite-measure Marine Isoprene Emission product show quite promising and provide an effective tool to monitoring marine isoprene emissions in global oceans.
Future work needs to focus on validating this marine isoprene emission product, thus provide reliable satellite marine emission product.
25
Conclusions
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR
Thank You!
26
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Air Resources Laboratory 27
Sensitivity to Kd(490) Retrieval Algorithm
∫−=max
0
2)ln(**][max**H
dhIEFaChlHSAP
)/)5.2ln((max 4900
KI
H −=
Some existing Kd(490) algorithms: 1. NASA previous operational algorithm (Mueller, 2000); 2. Revised Murller algorithm (J. Werdell, online 2005); 3. NASA current operational algorithm (Morel et al., 2007) http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/ANALYSIS/kdv4); 4. Wang’s new Kd(490) algorithms: (Wang et al., 2009).
Isoprene emissions very sensitive to Kd(490) (K490):
The emission algorithm weights heavily on the lower tail of Kd(490) values.
Menghua Wang, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Air Resources Laboratory 28
Sensitivity to input parameter: [Chl-a]
Daily [Chl-a] and Kd(490) Monthly [Chl-a] and Kd(490)
Using monthly, instead of daily, average [Chl-a] and K490 reveals larger source area for marine isoprene emissions.