1

SAPA VOLUME 1, DESEMBER 2011N E W S L E T T E R E D I S I P E R T A M A , N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 1N E W S L E T T E R E D I S I P E R T A M A , N O V E M B E R 2 0 1 1Strategic alliance for Poverty alleviation

(ALIANSI STRATEGIS UNTUK PENANGGULANGAN KEMISKINAN)

PROMOTING INNOVATION, COORDINATION AND PARTICIPATION IN POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROGRAMS

AdvisorSujana Royat (Kemenko Kesra),

Bambang Widianto (Tim Nasional

Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan,

TNP2K), Alexander Irwan (Ford Foundation)

Chief EditorKatiman Kartowinomo (Kemenko Kesra)

EditorYaury Tetanel (Komite Kemitraan Indonesia

untuk Penang gulangan Kemiskinan –

KKIPK), Katiman Kartowinomo (Kemenko

Kesra), Luh Nyoman Dewi Triandayani

(KKIPK), Fakhrulsyah Mega (KKIPK)

Contributorsaceh: Azharuddin

north Suma tera: Kominta Sari Purba

West Java: Surahmat, Eva Patimah, Umar

Alam, Yudi Kurnia, Daden Sukendar,

Deden

central Java: Zakaria, Gunung Wiryanto

yogyakarta: Triwahyuni Suci Wulandari

South Sulawesi: Mulyadi

east nusa tenggara: Paul

Bali: Luh Debora Murthy

West nusa tenggara: Siti Sanisah

layout

KOMSENI

PublisherSAPA Secretariat

Address: Jl. Kesehatan IX No. 8, Jakarta,

Telephone and fax 62 21 3865213

Website: www.sapa.dev.id

Email: sapa-indonesia@googlegroups.com

KEMENTERIAN KOORDINATOR BIDANG KESEJAHTERAAN RAKYAT

tanah: asset dan akses Menuju Sejahtera

Kemiskinan memang bisa di­definisikan­ secara­ luas,­baik­ fisik­ maupun­ non­

fisik,­baik­praktis,­pragmatis­mau­pun­ filosofis.­ Tapi­ sebenarnya­be­­nang­ merah­ yang­ bisa­ ditarik­dari­kemiskinan­adalah­ketiadaan­asset­dan­akses.­

Asset­ bisa­ diartikan­ sebagai­hak­penguasaan­terhadap­sumber­da­­ya­yang­tangible­seperti­tanah,­dan­akses­dapat­diartikan­sebagai­hak­masyarakat­miskin­untuk­ikut­menentukan­alokasi­sumber­daya­yang­ non­tangible­ seperti­ bi­­­bit­dan­ ternak,­ dan­ keuangan­ dan­

pa­­­­sar­yang­memungkinkan­me­­­­re­­ka­mengelola­asset­mereka­un­­tuk­men­cukupi­kebutuhan­hidup.­

Dalam­ edisi­ perdana­ ini­ se­­­ngaja­ sidang­ redaksi­ me­mi­lih­tema­ terkait­ dengan­ perta­­nah­an­karena­ tanah­mem­­punyai­ fung­­si­yang­ sangat­ strategis­ seka­­­li­­gus­vital­ untuk­ menang­gu­langi­ ke­mis­­kinan.­ Selain­ itu­ dari­ bebe­rapa­kasus­ sengketa­ tanah,­ yang­me­rupakan­feno­mena­gu­nung­es,­ter­simpan­ perma­sa­lahan­ men­dasar­ yang­ menjadi­ bom­ wak­tu­yang­ seolah­ menunggu­ pe­­­­­micu­un­tuk­ meledakkan­ berba­­­gai­

D a r i r e d a k s i

EDIS I 1 , DESEMBER 2011 | VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011

Bersama­dengan­Badan­Pertanahan­nasional­(BPN),­petani­miskin­di­Dusun­Kulonbambang,­Kabupaten­Blitar,­Jawa­Timur­berpartisipasi­dalam­pengukuran­tanah­untuk­land reform.

Together with the National land Agency BPN, poor farmers in Kulonbambang Village in Blitar District, East Java, participated in the land mapping for land reform.

2

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011D a r i r e d a k s i

masalah­ sosial­ di­ negeri­ ini.­Ma­sa­lah­ pertanahan­ juga­ sebe­nar­­nya­ mencerminkan­ multi­pro­­blem­ baik­ dari­ sisi­ ekonomi,­ke­­­adilan­sosial,­budaya,­good go­ver nance­ dan­ demokrasi.­ Sebut­sa­ja­ satu­ masalah­ yang­ di­ang­­kat­dalam­salah­satu­topik,­yaitu­per­­­ma­salahan­tanah­yang­terjadi­di­ Blitar,­ tempat­ dimana­ sang­Pro­­k­­lamator­ dan­ Wakil­ Pre­si­den­ kita­ sekarang­ lahir­ dan­ di­besarkan.­Issue­pertanahan­yang­di­­kisahkan­oleh­Kinan,­De­wan­Pe­­­­na­­­­sehat­ Paguyuban­ Pe­tani­ Ar­yo­Blitar,­ tentang­ bagai­­mana­ ti­dak­ber­­dayanya­ para­ pekerja­ per­­­­­­ke­­bunan­yang­tadi­nya­adalah­pe­­­­­milik­kebun­menunjukkan­bahwa­ke­­tia­daan­ asset­ dan­ akses­ bisa­ di­­aki­­­batkan­oleh­kebijakan­yang­se­­cara­

struktural­melemahkan­mereka.­Seiring­ dengan­ kemampuan­

me­reka­ mengorganisir­ diri­ un­tuk­mem­perjuangkan­ hak­mere­­­ka­atas­asset­dalam­bentuk­ta­­­­­­nah­yang­dipelopori­oleh­Kinan,­ke­hi­dupan­ masyarakat­ di­ perke­bun­an­ tersebut­ sudah­ men­jadi­ jauh­lebih­baik.­Apalagi­apabila­akses­ter­ha­dap­pengambilan­keputusan­un­tuk­alokasi­ sumber­daya­yang­in­ta­ngi­ble­ juga­bisa­mereka­per­oleh.­ Hal­ serupa­ juga­ terjadi­ di­Ka­bu­paten­ Garut­ dan­ Bandung­di­mana­asset­dan­akses­terhadap­tanah­ diberikan­ dan­ dibuka­ se­hingga­ masyarakat­ dapat­ lebih­leluasa­untuk­mengatur­kehi­dup­annya­dan­membebaskan­diri­dari­masalah­kemiskinan.­

Cerita­ sukses­ land reform di

tiga­ wilayah­ tersebut­ menun­juk­­­kan­ bahwa­ land reform­ yang­se­jak­ dulu­ diwacanakan­ dan­ te­lah­ di­ca­nangkan­ menjadi­ pro­gram­nasional­Badan­Pertanah­an­Nasional,­bukanlah­sesuatu­yang­‘menakutkan’­ dan­ tidak­ masuk­akal.­ Land reform­ da­lam­ bentuk­asset­ dan­ akses­ re­form­ justru­men­­­­jadi­simpul­da­ri­be­nang­per­­­­masalahan­ ke­mis­­kin­an­ dan­ ke­­­sen­­jangan­ yang­ kusut­ untuk­ ke­­mu­­dian­diurai­dan­menjadi­solu­­si­tepat­untuk­mem­ber­daya­kan­dan­men­­­sejahterakan­masya­rakat­pe­ta­ni­yang­miskin.

Tantangan­ yang­ harus­ diha­dapi­ selanjutnya­ adalah­ bagai­­ma­na­ mereplikasi­ upaya­upaya­ino­­­­­­­vasi­ land reform,­ yang­ pada­inti­­­nya­ membuka­ akses­ and­

lanDholDingS: aSSetS anD acceSS to ProSPerity

A definition of poverty can be wide-ranging, because it encompasses both the

phy sical and non-physical, the prac tical, the pragmatic, and one can even be philosophical about it. In fact, the basic tenet running through a discussion on poverty is that there is a glaring lack of assets and access to resources. Assets can include the rights over tangible resources, such as landholdings. Access could include the rights of poor communities to take part in de termining the allocation of non-tangible resources such as seedlings, livestock, financing and mar ket decisions, which could em-po wer them to fulfill their own basic daily needs.

In this first edition of this pu-bli cation, the editors have selected the theme of landholdings because land ownership is not only strategic but also vital in the effort for com -munities to overcome poverty. Often land dispute cases are like ice bergs, with the larger portion of the problem buried out of sight, creating a social time bomb waiting to detonate. Landholding issues are in fact a reflection of a multitude of problems, including ones with an economic, social injustice, cultural, good governance and democracy dimension.

One of the topics we have taken up is the one concerning land disputes in Blitar, the place where Indonesia’s first president was

born and raised. The issue raised by Kinan, advisor to the Association of Aryo Blitar Farmers, showed how incapacitated the field workers felt, who in fact were the original owners of the agricultural estate where they toiled as laborers. This case shows how non-ownership of assets and access can be a direct result of policy that by default takes away a community’s power over assets.

In tandem with the community’s capability to organize themselves to fight for their land rights with Kinan taking up the cudgels, life for this community has taken a turn for the better. This would be further enhanced once they have gained access to their rights to determine allocation of intangible resources. A similar situation happened in Garut and Bandung regencies, where assets and access to landholdings were opened up, enabling the communities to manage their own

3

SAPA NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011 f r o m t h e e d i t o r

mem­­­­­­beri­kan­ asset­ tanah­kepada­pe­­­­tani­dan­masyarakat­miskin,­ke­wilayah­wilayah­ lain­ yang­mem­punyai­tanah­potensial­untuk­‘di­bagikan’­ kepada­ petani.­ Upaya­upa­ya­positif­kemitraan­yang­te­lah­diupayakan­oleh­BPN,­Pemerintah­Daerah,­dan­Swasta­menjadi­best practices dan lessons learned­yang­perlu­ ditularkan­ seluas­luasnya­un­tuk­mempercepat­pengurang­an­kemiskinan.­Yang­lebih­urgen­lagi­adalah­bagaimana­melembaga­­­­kan­pola­pola­ kemitraan­ yang­ telah­terbukti­ efektif­ meningkatkan­ke­­­­sejahteraan­ rakyat­ ke­ da­lam­ke­­bijakan­ dan­ program­ peme­rin­­­tah­daerah­secara­reguler.­Jadi­da­lam­ inovasi­ land reform ini me­­merlukan­ good will­ sekaligus­willingness to do­dari­pemerintah,­

baik­pusat­maupun­daerah,­swasta­dan­kelompok­lainnya.­

Program­ SAPA­ yang­ didu­kung­oleh­berbagai­ stakeholders­ber­­upaya­ menjadi­ katalisator­agar­ good­ will­ dan­ willingness­dari­ semua­ pihak­ terkait­ refor­ma­ agraria­ dapat­ tumbuh­ dan­ter­­jem­batani­ dalam­ jeja­ring­ ke­mitraan­ yang­ saling­ meng­­un­­tung­kan.­ Upaya­upaya­ ter­se­­but­diantaranya­ dengan­ mengem­bang­­­­kan­ resource­ center­ di­ 15­kabu­­paten/kota­ sebagai­ basis­data­ kemis­kinan­ yang­ akan­ di­per­­kaya­ oleh­ pemerintah­ dae­­rah­ masing­masing­ untuk­ mem­pertajam­ tar­get­ kebijakan­ dan­program­dae­rah.­Yang­lebih­pen­ting­ lagi­ adalah­ resource­ cen­ter­akan­ menjadi­ salah­ satu­ early­

warning­ system­ terhadap­ per­­ma­­salahan­permasalahan­ sosial­yang­ mungkin­ akan­ mun­cul­dan­ me­­mer­lukan­ pena­ngan­an­yang­ cepat.­ Yang­ pasti­ pe­nang­gu­langan­ kemis­kinan­ me­merlu­kan­ upaya­ yang­ konsis­ten­ dan­terus­menerus.­ Banyak­ cara­ dan­jalan­ bisa­ ditempuh­ menuju­ ke­sana,­ dan­ reforma­ agraria­ men­jadi­satu­kunci­sukses­untuk­me­wujudkannya.­

Selamat­membaca.

Katiman Kartowinomo, Pemimpin Redaksi

lives and free themselves from poverty.

The success stories of land re-form in the three areas are strong evi dence that the notion for land ownership, long a favourite dis cour-se of the National Land Agency is nothing to be “scared” about, nor is it an improbable one to make it real. Land reform in the form of asset and access reform can in fact be the central solution to poverty alleviation and social gaps, and it can empower and create prosperity for poor farming communities.

The biggest challenge ahead is repli cating the innovative efforts for land reform, the central point to open up access and provision of land assets to farmers and poor com munities, in areas with enough land to be redistributed to far mers.

Effective partnerships created between the National Land Agency, local governments, and the private

sector can produce best practices and lessons learned to be spread far and wide to reduce poverty. Even more urgent is the need to institutionalize those partnerships that have proven effective in increas-ing the prosperity of commu nities, by the creation of policies and go-vernment programs. Land reform inno vations urgently need good will and political will on the part of both local and the central governments, as well as actors in the private sector and NGOs.

The SAPA program participated by various stakeholders aims to be-come a catalisator for goodwill and willingness of all parties involved in agrarian reform. We hope this reform will grow and create bridges between partners and networks, and be of benefit to all. These efforts include the establishment of resource centers in 15 cities/regencies as the repository for

poverty databases. This data can then be enhanced by the local governments in each locale to enrich their policy targets and local programs. More importantly, the resource centers can act as an early warning system for social problems that can emerge at any moment, needing rapid and careful handling. Poverty alleviation needs consistent and constant efforts. There are many roads and avenues that can be taken, and agrarian reform is one of the key solutions that could lead to the pathway of success.

Happy reading,

Katiman Kartowinomo, Editor in Chief

4

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011D a t a

Konversi lahan, Pembangunan Pertanian, dan Kemiskinan di indonesiaOleh, Yauri G.P Tetanel

Indonesia­sejak­lama­telah­mendeklarasikan­diri­nya­ sebagai­ negara­ agraris.­ Hal­ ini­ tentu­ saja­tidak­terlepas­dari­potensi­dan­kesuburan­lahan­

yang­dimiliki,­akan­tetapi­juga­karena­sebagian­besar­penduduknya­menggantungkan­mata­pencahariannya­pada­ bidang­ pertanian.­Walaupun­ demikian,­ dalam­beberapa­dekade­ terakhir­ ini,­ pembangunan­ sektor­pertanian­ mengalami­ ketertinggalan­ dengan­ pem­bangunan­sektor­ lainnya.­Contoh­yang­dapat­dilihat­secara­kasat­mata,­adalah­tidak­adanya­keberpihakan­pemerintah­ dalam­ melindungi­ alih­ fungsi­ lahan­pertanian.­ Walaupun­ telah­ diterbitkan­ sejumlah­kebijakan­ dan­ regulasi­ untuk­ mencegah­ alih­ funsi­lahan­ pertanian,­ namun­ pada­ kenyataannya­ alih­fungsi­ lahan­ pertanian­ terus­ meningkat­ setiap­tahunnya.­Data­BPS­menyebutkan­terjadi­alih­fungsi­lahan­pertanian­sebesar­100­ribu­hektar­per­tahun.­­Berikut­ ini­ adalah­ grafik­ mengenai­ perkembangan­luas­lahan­sawah­di­Indonesia.

Grafik 1. Perkembangan Luas Lahan Sawah di Indonesia (Juta Hektar)

Sumber­Data­:­Luas­Lahan­&­Penggunaannya,­BPS

Data­ pada­ grafik,­ menunjukkan­ bahwa­ jumlah­lahan­sawah­di­pulau­jawa­terus­mengalami­penurunan­dibandingkan­dengan­luas­lahan­sawah­diluar­pulau­jawa.­Penurunan­ lahan­sawah­dipulau­ jawa­sebesar­10,37­ juta­ hektar­ atau­ 0,31­%­ /­ tahun.­ Disamping­masalah­alih­fungsi­lahan­sawah,­persoalan­lain­yang­tidak­kalah­pentingnya­adalah­tanah­terlantar.Dalam­Peraturan­ Pemerintah­ No­ 11­ Tahun­ 2010­ ­ tentang­Pe­­nertiban­&­Pendayagunaan­Tanah­Terlantar­dise­butkan­bahwa­yang­dimaksud­dengan­obyek­pener­tiban­ tanah­ terlantar­ meliputi­ tanah­ yang­ sudah­diberikan­ hak­ oleh­ Negara­ berupa­ Hak­ Milik,­ Hak­Guna­Usaha,­Hak­Guna­Bangunan,­Hak­Pakai,­dan­Hak­Pengelolaan,­­atau­dasar­penguasaan­atas­tanah­yang­tidak­ diusahakan,­ ­ tidak­ dipergunakan,­ atau­ tidak­dimanfaatkan­ sesuai­ dengankeadaannya­ atau­ sifat­dan­tujuan­pemberian­hak­atau­dasar­penguasaannya.Data­BPN­menyebutkan­bahwa­di­Indonesia­masih­ada­sekitar­7,2­juta­hektar­tanah­terlantar.­

Alih­ fungsi­ lahan­ sawah­di­­ pulau­ jawa­ dipicu­ juga­ de­ngan­ meningkatnya­ jumlah­pen­­duduk­ setiap­ tahun­ yang­mem­­­berikan­ tekanan­ pada­ me­ning­katnya­ kebutuhan­ lahan­untuk­ permukiman­ mau­pun­pem­­­­bangunan­ infrasruktur­ lain­nya.­ Meningkatnya­ alih­ fungsi­lahan­ pertanian­ menimbulkan­an­caman­ yang­ serius­ terhadap­ke­­mampuan­ negara­ dalam­ pe­nye­diaan­ pangan.­ Bahkan­ pada­tahap­ tertentu,­ Indonesia­ mulai­dianggap­ telah­ kehilangan­ ke­daulatan­atas­pangan.­Sebut­saja­beberapa­ komoditi­ penting­ per­tanian­ yang­ menjadi­ konsumsi­masyarakat­banyak­seperti­beras,­harus­ diimpor­ dari­ negara­ lain.­

5

SAPA NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011 D a t a

nurunan­ jumlah­ penduduk­ miskin­ dari­ tahun­ ke­ta­­hun,­ namun­ demikian­ jumlah­ penduduk­ mis­kin­ yang­ tinggal­ di­ perdesaan­ masih­ cukup­ ting­gi.­Bah­­kan­ diduga­ bahwa­ sebagian­ penduduk­ mis­kin­yang­ berada­ di­ perkotaan­merupakan­ juga­ pen­du­duk­ perdesaan­ yang­ melakukan­ urbanisasi­ un­tuk­mendapatkan­ penghidupan­ yang­ lebih­ baik­ di­ per­­kotaan.­Dalam­beberapa­tahun­terakhir,­pe­me­­­rin­tah­mulai­memfokuskan­untuk­mendorong­im­ple­mentasi­program­program­ penanggulangan­ ke­miskinan­ di­perdesaan,­ seperti­ PNPM­ (Program­ Na­­sional­ Pem­­berdayaan­ Masyarakat).­ Walaupun­ demi­­kian,­ pro­gram–program­ penanggulangan­ ke­mis­kinan­ yang­dilakukan­ belum­ sepenuhnya­ menjawab­ persoalan­dasar­yang­menjadi­akar­kemiskinan­di­tingkat­desa­yaitu­masih­timpangnya­distribusi­kepe­milikan­dan­penguasaan­ lahan.­ Hampir­ sebagian­ besar­ tenaga­kerja­pertanian­diperdesaan­merupakan­buruh­tani­atau­ penggarap­ yang­ bekerja­ dengan­ upah­ yang­sangat­minim.­ Kondisi­ ini­ tentu­ saja­ tidak­ bisa­ ha­nya­ diselesaikan­ dengan­menginisiasi­ program­ pe­­­nang­gulangan­ kemiskinan,­ akan­ tetapi­ mem­bu­tuh­kan­ komitmen­ dan­ kebijakan­ politik­ peme­rintah­yang­kon­sisten­untuk­mengakhiri­ketimpangan­yang­ber­­ke­panjangan­ pada­ sektor­ pertanian.­ Berikut­ ini­adalah­ gambaran­mengenai­ perkembangan­ kondisi­kemis­kinan­di­tingkat­perkotaan­dan­pedesaan.

Berikut­ ini­ adalah­beberapa­ komoditi­ penting­ yang­harus­diimpor­Indonesia­dari­negara­lain.

Tabel 1. Posisi & Rerata Volume Impor Indonesia Terhadap Bahan Pangan

Bahan Pangan Beras Jagung Kedelai Daging Gula

Rerata Volume Impor (Ribu Ton)

437,99 962,24 1.180,55 13,60 822,76

Peringkat 13 22 11 33 2

Sumber­Data­:­USDA,­Grain­:­World­Markets­&­Trade.­Desember­2007­dikutip­melalui­Harian­Kompas.

Kebijakan­ negara­ yang­ belum­ berpihak­ pada­per­­­tanian­juga­berdampak­pada­aspek­lainnya­yaitu­tingkat­ penyerapan­ tenaga­ kerja­ pada­ sektor­ per­tanian.­Jumlah­tenaga­kerja­yang­bekerja­pada­sektor­pertanian­ menunjukkan­ penurunan­ dari­ tahun­ ke­tahun­ dan­ menjadi­ salah­ satu­ faktor­ penting­ yang­mendorong­terjadinya­urbanisasi­masyarakat­desa.­

Penurunan­jumlah­tenaga­kerja­di­sektor­perta­­­­ni­an­akibat­alih­fungsi­lahan­serta­tidak­adanya­ke­bi­jak­an­pemerintah­yang­melindungi­produksi­hasil­perta­nian­dalam­negeri­juga­menyebabkan­dam­pak­serius­dalam­penanggulangan­kemiskinan.­Kecen­­derungan­yang­ terjadi­ selama­ ini­ memang­ menunjukkan­ pe­

Grafik 2. Perkembangan Jumlah Penduduk Miskin di Perdesaan & Perkotaan (Dalam Juta Jiwa).

Sumber­:­Data&­Informasi­Kemiskinan­BPS

6

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011

land conversion, agrarian Development, and Poverty in indonesiaBy Yauri G.P Tetanel

Indonesia for quite a long time now has referred to itself as an agrarian country. This of course relates very much to the country’s fertile soil and land

potential. But it also refers to the fact that a major portion of the population depends on agriculture for their livelihood. It is ironic then that in the past few decades, agrarian development is lagging far behind when compared to progress enjoyed by other sectors. An outstanding case in point is the fact that the government provides practically no protection against shifts in the usage of agrarian land. Even though policies and regulations exist in abundance to waylay alteration of agrarian land functions, the reality is, agrarian land continues to decrease as years go by. Data by the Bureau of Statistics show that these shifts occur to the tune of 100 thousand hectares per year. Follows is a graph of paddyfield development in Indonesia.

Graph 1. Paddy-Field Development in Indonesia

Source: Land Size and Its Usage, Bureau of Statistics

The graph shows that the number of paddyfields in Java is on the decline (10.37 million hectares, or 0.31 per cent per year) in comparison to figures of land devoted to paddyfields outside of Java. Besides the matter of shifting of land function, another issue which is just as serious is that of fallow land.Government Regulation No. 11, 2010 governing Order and Utilization ofFallow Land statesthat fallow lands to be put in order include plots furnished with rights bestowed by the State in the form of Right of Ownership,Right of Livelihood Utilization, Right toBuild Upon, Right to Use, and Right to Manage, or basic power over plots not managed for business, not utilized, or land not made use of in line with its condition or characteristics or the aim of the rights and basic power over bestowedby the State.Datafrom the Bureau of Statistics show that some 7.2 million hectares of land are left fallow, or not made good use of.

D a t a

7

SAPA NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011

Shifts in usage of agrarian land on the island of Java is triggered by yearly population increases which create huge demands for housing areas and other types of infrastructure. This shift in agrarian land usage has created major pressures on the country’s ability to ensure food security. On a certain level, Indonesia is now perceived as having lost its food sovereignity. Several staple agricultural commodities, such as rice, now has to be imported. Follows is a graph that shows important staples that Indonesia imports from other countries.

Table 1. Position and Average Food Import Volumes by Indonesia

Food Type RiceHusk Corn

Soy Meat Sugar

Average Import 437,99 962,24 1.180,55 13,60 822,76

Volumes (in thousand Tons) Levels

13 22 11 33 2

Source: USDA, Grain: World Markets & Trade, Dec. 2007, quoted by Kompas daily

Policies that do not support growth in the agriculture sector also have impact on another aspect, that of the absorption of people working in that sector. Statistics show a definite decline on the numbers of people working in agriculture through the years, and this is one of the main factors behind the migration of village communities to urban centers.

The decline in numbers of the workforce in the agri culture sector is a direct result of changes in land usage, as well as the fact that the government pro-vid es no protective policies towards domestic agri-cul ture products. This in turn has created serious po verty challenges. Statistics show that even though poor communities are on the decline in Indonesia, the number of poor populations in villages are still quite high.

It is estimated that figures for portions of the poor in urban centers are also the self-same figures for poor communities in villages who have migrated to the city to seek out better livelihoods. In recent years, the government has focused on poverty alleviation programs, such as the PNPM (the National Community Empowerment Program) in village areas. Yet, these programs have not touched on the inherent cause of poverty at the village level, i.e. the glaring gaps in distribution of ownership and access to landholdings. A big number of the agricultural workforce in villages are field labourers or hired help who work for a very basic minimum wage.

This state of affairs obviously cannot be solved by a mere initiation of poverty alleviation programs. They need real commitment and consistent goverment policies to end longstanding gaps in the agriculture sector. Follows is a graph on the development of poverty growth in urban centers and villages.

Graph 2. Development of Poor Populations in Villages and Urban Centers (in millions)

Source: Poverty Data and Information, Bureau of Statistics

D a t a

8

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011

8

apa Manfaat Sistem informasi Desa (SiD)

What a village information System (SiD) is for

Setelah­berhasilnya­ujicoba­SID­di­berbagai­desa­ter­sebut,­ se­karang­ CRI,­ IDEA­ (Institute­ for­ Deve­lop­ment­ and­ Economic­ Ana­­lysis,­ Yogyakarta)­ dan­FORMASI­(Forum­Masyarakat­Sipil,­Kebu­men),­seba­gai­bagian­dari­SAPA,­be­kerjasama­untuk­se­cara­ber­tahap­membangun­SID­di­selu­ruh­desa­di­Kabupaten­Gunung­Kidul­dan­Kebumen.­Untuk­ tahap­pertama,­di­ Gunung­ Kidul­ SID­ di­­bangun­ di­ Desa­ Nglegi­ dan­Girikarto.­Kedua­desa­tersebut­di­pilih­menjadi­loka­si­awal­pe­ngem­bangan­SID­karena­disana­IDEA­dan­PKM­(Peningkatan­Ke­­ber­dayaan­Masyarakat),­da­lam­kerangka­program­SAPA,­telah­mem­fasilitasi­dilaku­kannya­Ana­lisis­Kemiskinan­Desa­Parti­sipatif­(AKDP).­AKPD­kemudian­diintegrasikan­ke­dalam­SID­supaya­perencanaan­dan­pengambilan­keputusan­desa­bisa­responsif­terhadap­kebutuhan­orang­miskin.

Apa isi SIDSID­mempunyai­tiga­basis­data­utama,­yakni­basis­data­kependudukan­desa,­basis­data­keuangan­desa,­dan­basis­data­sumber­daya­desa.­Basis­data­kependudukan­desa­ adalah­ bagian­ pertama­ yang­ dibangun­ untuk­menjadi­data­dasar­yang­bisa­dijadikan­rujukan­bagi­pengembangan­data­dan­informasi­lainnya.­Basis­data­kependudukan­ ini­menyimpan­data­ dasar­ keluarga­yang­ mencakup­ data­ kependudukan­ berdasarkan­data­ Kartu­ Keluarga­ (KK)­ dan­ data­ individu­ per­Nomor­Induk­Kependudukan­(NIK).­

Sejarah SIDGagasan­pengembangan­Sistem­Informasi­Desa­(SID)­yang­ di­ope­rasikan­ oleh­ perangkat­ desa­ pertama­kali­muncul­ di­ ta­hun­ 2008­ di­ Desa­ Terong­ di­ Ban­tul,­Yogyakarta.­Pemerintah­desa­ingin­membangun­sis­tem­ layan­an­ publik­ di­ desa­ yang­ baik,­ leng­kap,­dan­ cepat­ berdasarkan­ data­ berbasis­ computer­yang­ aku­­­rat.­ Pemerintah­ Desa­ Terong,­ yang­ telah­menge­­­­­­nal­ COM­BINE­ Resource­ Institution­ (CRI)­me­­la­­­­lui­ pengelolaan­ jaringan­ radio­ komu­nitas­ di­Yogyakarta,­ me­minta­ bantuan­ NGO­ tersebut­ untuk­mem­bangun­ sistem­ infor­masi­ pengelolaan­ sumber­daya­komunitas.­

SID­di­Desa­Terong­mulai­di­ba­ngun­pada­perte­ngah­an­tahun­2009.­Pada­akhir­tahun­2011­ini,­SID­te­lah­ diuji­cobakan­ di­ sejumlah­ desa­ di­ Yogyakarta,­Jawa­tengah,­Jawa­Timur,­dan­Jawa­Barat,­me­liputi:

Bantul,­Yogyakarta­­ :­ 3­desa•­Gunungkidul,­Yogyakarta­­ :­ 2­desa•­Klaten,­Jawa­Tengah­­ :­ 8­desa•­Magelang,­Jawa­Tengah­­ :­ 2­desa•­Temanggung,­Jawa­Tengah­:­ 1­desa•­Pacitan,­Jawa­Timur­­ :­ 1­desa•­Tasikmalaya,­Jawa­Barat­­ :­ 1­desa•­

History of SID

The notion to develop a Village Information System (SID) operated by the village administration was first sounded out in 2008 at the Terong Village in Bantul, Yogyakarta. Village administrations had a dire need to establish good public service systems that were comprehensive and rapid, and ones that used accurate computer-based data. The Terong Village administration, already familiar with the Combine Resource Institution (CRI) through a community radio network project in Yogyakarta, requested NGO assistance to push through the idea of establishing a community resource information mana-gement system.

SID in Terong Village began to be established in

mid-2009. By the end of 2011, the SID had already been tried and tested on a number of villages in Yogyakarta, Central Java, East Java and West Java, covering:

Bantul, Yogyakarta : 3 villagesGunungkidul, Yogyakarta : 2 villagesKlaten, Jawa Tengah : 8 villagesMagelang, Jawa Tengah : 2 villagesTemanggung, Jawa Tengah : 1 villagesPacitan, Jawa Timur : 1 villagesTasikmalaya, Jawa Barat : 1 villages

After a successful SID trial run in all those villages, CRI, the Institute for Development and Economic Ana-lysis (IDEA) in Yogyakarta, and the Forum for Civil So-ciety (Formasi) in Kebumen, members of SAPA, are now working together in steps to form SID in all the villages throughout the Gunung Kidul and Kebumen Regencies.

D a t a

9

SAPA NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011

Data­ dalam­ SID­dapat­ diolah­secara­ statistik­ dan­ juga­ dapat­dijadikan­data­dasar­pengolah­an­dokumen.­Catatan­bukti­kegiatan­ad­­ministrasi­ dan­ keuangan­ di­ting­kat­desa­terekam­pula­dalam­sis­­tem­ ini.­ Kegiatan­ urusan­ ke­uang­­an­ desa­ yang­ bersifat­ ha­rian,­ bulanan,­ dan­ tahunan­ da­pat­ disimpan­ dan­ dipanggil­kem­­­­bali­ datanya­ dalam­ format­stan­dard­ yang­ telah­ diatur­ oleh­pe­merintah­ kabupaten.­ Modul­ke­uangan­ dalam­ aplikasi­ SID­ ini­da­pat­mencetak­ secara­ langsung­la­por­an­ kas­ buku­ kecil­ sebagai­buk­ti­ transaksi­ keuangan­ desa­hingga­jurnal.­

dilakukan­oleh­pemerintah­desa­dengan­bantuan­tim­Karang­Taruna­selama­3­minggu.­Untuk­selanjutnya,­proses­pengelolaan­data­dan­update­data­dilakukan­oleh­ staf­ pemerintah­ Desa­ Terong.­ Sekarang­ SID­Desa­Terong­sudah­bisa­diakses­melalui­ internet­di­http://terong­bantul.web.id.­ Se­dang­SID­Nglegi­dan­Girikarto­ bisa­ di­akses­ di­ http://nglegi.sidesa.co.cc­dan­http://girikarto.sidesa.co.cc.

At the beginning, the Gunung Kidul SID was established in the villages of Nglegi and Girikarto. The two villages were selected because it was there that IDEA and Association of Community Empowerment (ACE), as part of SAPA Program, facilitated a Participatory Village Poverty Ana-lysis, or AKDP. This AKPD was later on integrated into the SID, to ensure all village planning and decisionmaking were responsive to the needs of the poor.

What Are SID’s Contents?SID contains three main databases, i.e. the village population figures, the village’s fiscal database, and information on the village’s resources. The village population database was the first part to be established to become the basic data for reference when creating further databases and information systems. Population data covered basic family data including population details, family data, and data on the individuals based

on their Population Central Number (NIK).Data in SID can be crunched statistically, and can

also be used as basic data to organize documents. Ad-ministrative and fiscal village documents are recorded into the system. Fiscal activity of the village, from the daily, monthly and yearly records can be filed and retrie-ved in standard format as organized by the regency ad-mi nistration. Financial modules when applying SID can be printed directly into the ledgers as proof of monetary transactions right up to when they are recorded in the village’s journal.

Who compiles and updates data for SID?Initial Terong village SID data was constructed using survey results on Basic Family Data from the Village Pro file published by the Ministry of Internal Affairs in early 2010, a joint-program between village admi nis-trations and village agencies, including hamlets, RT and

Staf­Pemerintah­Kabupaten­Bangka­Barat­berkunjung­ke­Desa­Terong­di­Bantul­untuk­mempelajari­SID.Staf of West Bangka District Government visited Terong village in Bantul to learn about Village Information System (SID).

Siapa yang mengumpulkan dan melakukan updating data?Data­awal­SID­Terong­dibangun­de­­ngan­mengguna­kan­ hasil­ sur­­vei­ Data­Dasar­Keluarga­ –­ Profil­ Desa­yang­ diterbitkan­ oleh­ Ke­menterian­ Dalam­ Negeri­di­awal­tahun­2010­yang­merupakan­ker­jasama­an­tara­ pemerintah­ desa­ dengan­ lembaga­masyarakat­desa­ seperti­ dusun,­RT,­ dan­Karang­Taruna.­ Proses­input­data­1605­Ke­pala­Keluarga­(KK)­ke­dalam­SID­

D a t a

10

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011

Update­data­dilakukan­ber­barengan­dalam­fung­si­SID­untuk­pelayanan­publik.­Setiap­hari­dalam­pro­ses­pelayanan­publik­kepada­warga­desa,­staf­peme­rin­tah­desa­akan­selalu­menerima­update­perubahan­atau­koreksi­data­dari­warga­yang­datang­ke­kantor­desa­untuk­melakukan­urusan­administrasi.­Perubahan,­ko­­reksi,­ dan­pembaruan­data­dapat­dilakukan­ saat­ itu­juga.­Warga­dapat­melihat­hasil­update­data­itu­me­­­lalui­satu­komputer­di­ruang­tunggu­kantor­desa­atau­melalui­website.­Jika­ada­data­yang­salah,­warga­da­pat­melaporkannya­secara­langsung­atau­melalui­sms.

Apa manfaat SID

Tim­Koordinasi­Penanggulangan­Kemiskinan­Daerah­(TKPKD)­Gunung­Kidul­sangat­mengapresiasi­inovasi­SID­ dan­ mempersilahkan­ data­ tersebut­ digunakan­sebagai­ dasar­ pelaksanaan­ program­ daerah­ di­ dua­desa­ tersebut.­Rencananya,­ SID­akan­diagregasikan­dengan­ sistem­ yang­ ada­ di­ tingkat­ kecamatan­ dan­kabupaten.­ Sistem­ ini­ tidak­ hanya­ memungkinkan­pemerintah­ yang­ lebih­ tinggi­ untuk­ memonitor­proses­yang­terjadi­di­tingkat­desa,­tapi­setiap­Dinas­

juga­akan­bisa­memanfaatkan­SID­untuk­menentukan­prioritas­dan­penyaluran­program­pro­gram­mereka.­Dengan­ demikian,­ program­program­ mereka­ akan­lebih­ sesuai­ dengan­ kebutuhan­ masya­rakat­ desa,­terutama­penduduk­miskinnya.

Sinkronisasi­ sistem­ juga­ akan­ memungkin­kan­pe­­­­­me­­rintah­kebupaten­menampilkan­berbagai­doku­­men­ kebijakan­ perencanaan­ dan­ penganggar­an­ se­­per­ti­Pagu­Indikatif­Kecamatan­(untuk­sistem­ting­­­kat­kecamatan)­dan­Pagu­ Indikatif­SKPD­yang­berbasis­Dinas­ (untuk­ sistem­ tingkat­ kabupaten).­ SID­ juga­akan­ menawarkan­ sistem­ sms­ gateway­ yang­ me­­mung­kinkan­ warga­ untuk­ mengirimkan­ data­ hasil­moni­­toring­ yang­ mereka­ lakukan­ sendiri­ terha­dap­pro­gram­program­ pembangunan­ yang­ ada.­ Sistem­informasi­ interaktif­ pengembangan­SID­ saat­ ini­ se­dang­ terus­ dikembangkan­ dalam­ sebuah­ sistem­online­di­alamat­http://lumbungkomunitas.net.­Keber­ada­an­ sistem­ yang­ interaktif­ ini­ dapat­ mendorong­terlak­sananya­ program­ pengentasan­ kemiskinan­yang­efektif­dan­efisien.

Karang Taruna. Data input processing of 1605 Heads of Households into the SID was conducted by the village administration with the help of Karang Taruna members for three weeks. In the next step, data management and updating will be carried out by administrative staff of Terong Village. The Terong Village SID can now be accessed on http://terong-bantul.web.id. Nglegi and Girikarto SID can be accessed on http://nglegi.sidesa.co.cc and http://girikarto.sidesa.co.cc.

Data updates can be carried out in tandem with the SID function of servicing the public. Each day in the process of servicing the village public, village adminis-tration staff will keep on receiving alterations or data corrections from village members visiting their office. These alterations and corrections can be done right there and right away. The community can see the updates as they are processed into the computer in the waiting room of the office, or on the website. Incorrect data can be reported directly or through short messaging texts using cell phones.

Why SID is NeededThe Local Poverty Alleviation Coordination Team (TKPKD) of Gunung Kidul has shown much appreciation

towards the SID innovation, and has allowed their data to be used as the base for implementation of regional programs in the two villages. According to plan, SID will be aggregated into the Sub-district and Regency systems. The system does not only make it possible for higher offices to monitor processes occurring on the ground at village level, it also provides inputs for each Government Agency to examine priority issues and decide appropriate programs. Finally, programs created will be responsive to the community’s needs, in particular the needs of the poor in that community.

Synchronization of the system will also make it possi ble for Regency Administration to present policy and budgeting documents such as the Sub-district Budget Platform and the SKPD Budget Platforms. SID can also offer a gateway equipped with short messaging system that would make it possible for community members to send personal monitoring results on existing development programs. Interactive information systems to develop SID are currently being designed into an online system on http://lumbungkomunitas.net. The existence of an interactive system can really push forward the implementation of effective and efficient poverty alleviation programs.

D a t a

11

SAPA NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011

Kerjasama Multi Pihak dalam Pelaksanaan Reforma Agraria:

Sebuah Jalan Keluar Baru dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Kabupaten garut dan Bandung

reform­merupakan­proses­penyediaan­akses­bagi­pe­nerima­manfaat­ terhadap­sumber­sumber­eko­nomi­dan­politik­serta­partisipasi­ekonomi­politik,­modal,­pasar,­ teknologi,­pendampingan,­peningkatan­ka­pa­sitas­ dan­ kemampuan­ yang­ memungkinkan­ petani­untuk­ mengembangkan­ tanahnya­ sebagai­ sumber­ke­­hidupan.­Asset reform­ tanpa­diikuti­access reform tidak­ akan­ berhasil­ membuat­ petani­ keluar­ dari­kemiskinan.­ Sebaliknya,­ asset reform­ yang­ diikuti­dengan access reform­akan­menjadi­jalan­keluar­ba­gi­petani­untuk­keluar­dari­kemiskinan­,­seperti­yang­terjadi­di­Kabupaten­Garut­dan­Bandung.Sesung­guh­nya,­reforma­agraria­bukanlah­sesuatu­yang­baru­yang­dapat­ dikategorikan­ sebagai­ sebuah­ inovasi.­ Te­tapi­re­forma­agraria­menjadi­sebuah­inovasi­ketika­dalam­pelak­sanaannya­menggunakan­dan­melahirkan­me­tode­baru­yang­mendatangkan­keberhasilan.­

Dalam­ reforma­ agraria­ saat­ ini,­ ia­ tidak­ hanya­sekedar­asset reform,­tetapi­juga­diikuti­access reform.­

Jawa­Barat­sebagian­besar­penduduknya­ber­mata­pen­caharian­sebagai­petani,­sehingga­ke­tika­dari­tahun­ke­tahun­luas­tanah­garapan­se­makin­ber­

kurang,­isu­kepemilikan­tanah­menjadi­topik­ha­ngat.­Disinyalir,­semakin­banyak­orang­menjadi­miskin­ka­rena­tidak­lagi­memiliki­lahan­untuk­di­garap.­Mereka­yang­dahulu­petani­pemilik­sawah,­beralih­menjadi­buruh­tani­atau­petani­peng­ga­rap.­Di­daerah­daerah­se­perti­Kabupaten­Garut­dan­Ban­dung,­kemiskinan­ti­dak­dapat­terlepas­dari­ma­sa­lah­kepemilikan­tanah.­Maka­ketika­Pemerintah­me­ngeluarkan­program­re­forma­ agraria­ yang­ merupakan­ perpaduan­ antara­asset reform dan access reform,­ disambut­baik­oleh­se­mua­pihak,­utamanya­petani­tanpa­tanah.­

Asset reform yang­merupakan­penataan­kem­bali­penguasaan,­ kepemilikan,­ penggunaan­dan­peman­fa­­atan­ tanah­ berdasarkan­ hukum­ dan­ peraturan­per­­­­undang­undangan­pertanahan,­mencakup­re­dis­tri­­busi­ tanah­ dan­ legalisasi­ aset.­ Sedangkan­ access

A large portion of the population in West Java relies on farming for their livelihood. This makes the issue of ever-decreasing landholdings

over the years a hot topic for discussion. Many people became destitute for no longer having land to farm on. Many former paddy-field owners had to become field laborers, working on land owned by other parties. In areas such as Garut and Bandung, poverty is very much related to the issue of land ownership. Thus, when the government declared an agrarian reform program, i.e. a combination of asset reform and access reform, the move was applauded by stakeholders, especially landless farmers.

Asset reform, which is a reorganization of owner-ship and the right of use over land based on law and by-laws, also includes redistribution of land and lega-lization of assets. Access reform is the process of pro viding beneficiaries an access to economic and

Working Together to Implement Agrarian Reform:

innovations in Poverty alleviation in garut and Bandung

poli tical resources, giving them access to capital, the market, technology, assistance, capacity building, and participation in political economy, and increasing their capability to develop land as their source of livelihood. Asset reform without access reform is of no use to farmers embroiled in poverty.

On the other hand, the combination of the two re-forms has provided a way out of destitution for farm-ers in Garut and Bandung. Agrarian reform, of course, is nothing new, and cannot even be dubbed as inno-vati ve. But it is innovation if in its implementation, new methodologies are enacted with successful end results.

The current agrarian reform program does not only deal with the issues of assets and access, it also involves all stakeholders, encompassing the central and local governments, the private sector and NGOs, and of course the landless farmers.

i n o v a s i

12

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011

Dalam­ pelaksanaannya­ pun­ melibatkan­ seluruh­pihak,­tidak­hanya­pemerintah­(pusat­atau­daerah),­tetapi­juga­swasta­dan­lembaga­swadaya­masyarakat,­serta­ masyarakat­ penerima­ tanah­ (petani­ tanpa­tanah).­ Keterlibatan­multi­ pihak­ ini­ membutuhkan­koordinasi­satu­dengan­lainnya,­agar­reforma­agraria­dapat­berjalan­dengan­baik.­Maka­pembagian­peran­masing­masing­ menjadi­ sebuah­ keharusan.­ Secara­umum,­ pembagian­ peran­ yang­ terjadi­ adalah:­ BPN­berperan­dalam­proses­asset reform­(redistribusi­dan­legalisasi­ tanah),­ada­kalanya­swasta­ juga­berperan­dalam­asset reform,­yakni­ketika­memberikan­tanah­mereka­untuk­diredistribusikan.­Pemerintah­Daerah­dan­LSM­lebih­banyak­berperan­dalam­access reform, walaupun­ dalam­ lingkup­ kegiatan­ yang­ berbeda.­Pemerintah­Daerah­berperan­dalam­pemberian­mo­dal­serta­peningkatan­kapasitas­dan­keahlian­dalam­rangka­membuka­akses­ ekonomi­bagi­petani­pe­ne­rima­ tanah.­LSM­berperan­da­lam­pengorganisasian­dan­pe­ningkatan­kapasitas­petani,­se­hingga­mereka­mampu­mengelola­modal­yang­akan­mereka­terima­bersamaan­dengan­pemberian­tanah.­

Potret­ keberhasilan­ petani­ (dan­ buruh­ per­ke­bunan)­ yang­ mem­peroleh­ kombinasi­ asset reform dan access reformdalam­bentuk­tanah,­modal­(tidak­hanya­be­rupa­uang),­dan­ketrampilan­me­lalui­peng­organisasian­yang­di­lakukan­oleh­LSM,­dapat­dilihat­di­Kabupaten­Garut­dan­Bandung.­

Di­Desa­Sagara,­Kecamatan­Cibalong,­Kabu­paten­Garut, buruh­perkebunan­yang­menjadi­sasaran­pe­lak­sanaan­ reforma­ agraria­ berhasil­ meningkatkan­taraf­hidupnya­ secara­ signifikan.­ Sebelum­memiliki­tanah­ (kebun­ karet),­ mereka­ bekerja­ sebagai­ bu­ruh­ perkebunan­ dengan­ upah­ per­ bulan­ sebesar­220.000­ rupiah.­ Setelah­ memperoleh­ tanah­ seluas­rata­rata­ 1­ hektar­ per­ kepala­ keluarga­ dan­ ta­na­m­an­ karet,­ pendapatan­ mereka­ per­ bulan­ men­ca­pai­ 7.000.000­ rupiah.­ Tentunya,­ mereka­ dibekali­dengan­ ketrampilan­ dalam­ mengelola­ per­kebunan­karet­ dan­ juga­ pemasarannya.­ Peme­rintah­ Daerah­dan­ Lembaga­ Swadaya­ Masyarakat­ bekerjasama­dalam­ pengorganisasian­ buruh­ dan­ peningkatan­kemampuan­dan­ketrampilan­mereka.­

i n o v a s i

Obviously, this involvement of multi-stakeholders needs thorough coordination to ensure that reform is carried out well. Each party has their own well-defined role. And so the National Land Agency, and in certain cases the private sector, take care of asset reform when divvying out their land for redistribution.

Meanwhile, local governments and NGOs are more involved in access reform, though both holding differing roles. While the local administrations provide capital and expertise to open up economic access to program beneficiaries, NGOs help farmers to organize themselves and assist in capacity building so that farmers can manage their assets and landholdings well once they have received them. Portraits of successful farmers and field laborers, beneficiaries of a combination of assets and access reforms being enacted in the form of provision of land and capital (though not necessarily financial), and increased capacity organized by NGOs, can now be observed in the Bandung and Garut areas.

In the village of Sagara, Cibalong, in Garut, we now can find field laborers beneficiaries of agrarian reform who have improved the quality of their lives significantly. Before obtaining ownership of their rubber plantation land, they had been workers earning monthly salaries of Rp 220,000 (just a little under USD 25). After receiving rubber saplings and land to the amount of one hectare per household, their income multiplied to Rp 7,000,000 (almost USD 800) per month. They were also given trainings in plantation management and marketing techniques. The local government and NGOs had worked closely together to organize these workers to enhance their capacity and provide them with the skills they needed.

In Bandung regency, coordination and division of stakeholder roles were key to the success of agrarian reform in the village of Cipelah. Local Government Departments, known as SKPD, defined each of their roles and coordinated with other SKPDs, ensuring that

13

SAPA NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011 i n n o v a t i o n

Di­Kabupaten­Bandung,­koordinasi­dan­pem­bagian­peran­para­pihak­menjadi­kunci­keberhasilan­reforma­agraria­ di­ Desa­ Cipelah.­ Pembagian­ peran­ SKPD­(Satuan­ Kerja­ Pemerintah­ Daerah)­ dan­ koordinasi­antar­ SKPD­ berjalan­ dengan­ baik,­ sehingga­ tanah­seluas­ 84,2­ hektar­ berhasil­ diredistribusi­ ke­pada­petani­penggarap­yang­sebelumnya­menggarap­tanah­yang­ dikuasai­ oleh­ PT­ Millenia­ Indonesia­Cibuni­Estate.­ Beberapa­ SKPD­ yang­ terlibat­ dan­ bentuk­keterlibatannya­dapat­dilihat­dalam­tabel­berikut:

No SKPD Progam Kegiatan

1 BKP3 Desa­Mandiri­Pangan

2 Distanhutbun Penyediaan­bibit­budi­daya­tanaman

3 Diskoperindag Pelatihan­koperasi

4 BPMPD Alokasi­Dana­Desa­(ADD)

5 Dinas­SEDAPE Infrastruktur­Irigasi

6 Disnakan Penyediaan­bibit­ternak­domba/kelinci

7 Kepala­Desa Alokasi­Dana­Desa­

Melalui­program­reforma­agraria­ (asset reform)­sebanyak­200­KK­memperoleh­sertifikat­tanah­ru­mah­tinggal­mereka.­Selain­itu,­tanah­yang­diobyek­reforma­agraria­ dialokasikan­ untuk­ pertanian­ dan­ pem­ba­ngun­an­fasiltias­umum.­Dengan­demikian,­tanah­yang­sebelumnya­hanya­menjadi­lahan­tidur­dapat­diman­faatkan­untuk­menanggulangi­kemiskinan.

Jika­berjalan­dengan­baik,­ reforma­agraria­yang­memadukan­ antara­asset reform dan access reform dapat­menjadi­sebuah­alternatif­solusi­dalam­upa­ya­penanggulangan­ kemiskinan.­ Keberhasilan­ pe­lak­sanaan­reforma­agraria­membutuhkan­keter­li­batan­seluruh­pihak,­baik­Pemerintah­(Pusat­dan­Daerah),­swasta,­ maupun­ LSM,­ dan­ tentunya­ masya­rakat­yang­menjadi­ sasaran­program.­Karena­melibatkan­banyak­pihak,­maka­koordinasi­dan­sinergi­para­pihak­menjadi­sebuah­keharusan.

84.2 hectares of land were successfully redistributed among farmers formerly working on land managed by PT Millenia Indonesia-Cibuni Estate. SKPDs and their forms of involvement can be glanced at in the following table:

NoSKPD (Local Govern-ment Department)

Program Activity

1 BKP3 Village Food Sovereignity

2Forest, Farming and Plantation Office

Provision of horticulture see-dlings

3Cooperatives, Industri-es and Trade Office

Cooperatives training

4 BPMPD Village Fund Allocation (ADD)

5 Dinas SEDAPE Irrigation Infrastructure

6Animal Husbandry Of-fice

Provision of sheep and rabbit livestock starters

7 Village Head Village Fund Allocation

In this agrarian reform program, 200 households received certificates for their homes and land of abode. Land dedicated to the reform was allocated for farming and public amenities infrastructure. Thus, plots of land formerly lying fallow are now being utilized to overcome poverty.

If all goes well, agrarian reform combining the con-cepts of asset reform and access reform can be a solution in the effort to alleviate poverty. Success in this endeavor would need the involvement of all concerned, including local and national government administrations, the private sector, NGOs, and of course the communities targeted in the programs. As a multi-stakeholder effort, solid coordination and synergy among the parties should be an imperative.

14

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011

Dodi Kholid imron (Kepala Kantor Wilayah Badan Pertanahan Nasional Provinsi Jawa Tengah)

Sebagai­Kepala­Kantor­Wilayah­Badan­Perta­nah­an­Nasional­Provinsi­Jawa­Tengah,­Bapak­Dodi­Kholid­ Imron­ banyak­ berkecimpung­ dalam­

reforma­ agraria,­ terutama­ karena­ di­ Jawa­ Tengah­masalah­kemiskinan­banyak­terkait­dengan­masalah­kepemilikan­aset.­­Dari­4.840.798­KK­miskin­di­Jawa­Tengah,­sebanyak­1,26­Juta­KK­tidak­memiliki­rumah.­Keadaan­kemiskinan­yang­disebabkan­oleh­ketiada­­an­kepemilikan­ asset­ tersebut­mengakibatkan­ ter­jadi­nya­sengketa­dan­konflik­pertanahan­yang­sis­temik.­Data­ Tahun­ 2011­ me­nampakkan­ jumlah­ konflik,­sengketa­dan­perkara­di­Jawa­Tengah­mencapai­347­kasus,­dengan­detil­rincian:­konflik­sebanyak­5­kasus,­seng­keta­sebanyak­102­kasus,­dan­perkara­sebanyak­240­kasus.­

Permasalahan­ tersebutlah­ yang­ harus­ diha­dapi­dan­dicarikan­jalan­keluarnya­oleh­Kanwil­Badan­Per­tanahan­Nasional­Prov­Jateng­dibawah­kepe­mimpinan­Bapak­ Dodi­ Kholid­ Imron.­ Reforma­ Agraria,­ yang­me­­­rupakan­ program­ Badan­ Pertanahan­ Nasional­men­jadi­jalan­keluar­yang­efektif­bagi­per­masalahan­

tersebut.­ Kegiatan­ reforma­ agraria­ di­ Jateng­ telah­menampakkan­ hasil­ yang­ dapat­ mem­berikan­ jalan­keluar­ dari­ permasalahan­ kemis­kinan­ yang­ ber­sumber­ pada­ ketiadaan­ aset.­ Di­ Cilacap,­ melalui­pro­ses­ mediasi­ denganantara­ masyarakat­ dengan­PT­ RSA,­ tanah­ seluas­ 284,12­ ha­ diredistribusikan­ke­­pada­ 5.141­ petani­ penggarap,­ di­ Desa­ Kauripan­Kec.­ Subah­ Kabupaten­ Batang,­ melalui­ mediasi,­konflik­ pertanahan­ dapat­ diselesaikan,­ dan­ tanah­seluas­ 32,72­ Ha­ berhasil­ diredistribusikan­ untuk­kurang­lebih­144­petani­penggarap,­di­Desa­Trisobo­Ke­camatan­Boja­Kabupaten­Kendal,­melalui­mediasi,­konflik­pertanahan­antara­masyarakat­dan­PT.­KAL,­dan­tanah­seluas­11,5­Ha­berhasil­diresdistribusikan­untuk­kurang­lebih­500­petani.

Selain­ dalam­ bentuk­ redistribusi­ tanah,­ refor­ma­agraria­secara­utuh,­yang­merupakan­per­paduan­antara­asset reform dan access reform­juga­telah­ber­hasil­ dilakukan.­ Kerjasama­­ terbesar­ dalam­ rangka­access reform dilakukanmelalui­ MOU­ antaraKanwil­BPN­dengan:­Pemprov.­Jawa­Tengah,­Bank­Indonesia,­Diperindagkop,­Dinas­Peternakan,­Pemkab­Semarang,­PT.­SidoMuncul,­Bank­BRI,­Bank­Jateng,­PT.­Indolakto,­PT.­ Cimori,­ PT.­ Sari­ Husada,­ danPT.­ CitaNasional.­­Access reform­ tersebut­ diwujudkan­ dalam­ bentuk­pengembangan­klaster­tanaman­obat­dan­sapi­perah/sapi­potong.­

Dodi Kholid imron (Head of Provincial National Land Agency, Province of Central Java)

As the Central Java office Head of the National Land Agency, Dodi Kholid Imron is very familiar with agrarian reform issues, especially in light of

the fact that in his region, much of the issues of poverty are directly related to the matter of asset ownership. Of 4,840,798 poor households in Central Java, 1.26 million of them do not own housing. Poverty as a result of non-ownership of assets has periodically caused systemic conflicts and disputes over landholdings. In 2011, 347 dispute cases were recorded, covering: 5 cases of

conflict, 102 cases of land disputes, and legal tussling amounting to 240 cases.

These cases had to be provided with solutions. Agrarian Reform, a program under the National Land Agency has been deemed as being the most effective of these solutions. Agrarian Reform in Central Java has been most successful in the alleviation of poverty caused by non-ownership of assets. In Cilacap, a process of mediation between the community and PT RSA company resulted in 284.12 hectares of land being redistributed to 5,141 landless farmers. In the village of Kauripan, Subah, in Batang, mediation resulted in 32.72 hectares being redistributed to around 144 landless farmers. In the village of Trisobo, Boja, Kendal, mediation between the community and PT KAL company resulted in 11.5

Stakeholder’s opinion

15

SAPA NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011

Menyadari­ pentingnya­ peran­ dan­ keterlibatan­ba­nyak­ pihak­ selain­ pemerintah,­ Kantor­ Wilayah­Badan­ Pertanahan­ Propinsi­ Jawa­ Tengah­ dibawah­kepe­mim­pinan­ Bapak­ Dodi,­ bekerjasama­ dengan­pihak­swasta­dan­lembaga­swadaya­masyarakat­yang­peduli­dan­mem­fokuskan­kegiatannya­pada­isu­tanah.­­Oleh­karena­ itu,­Kantor­Wilayah­Badan­Pertanahan­Propinsi­ Jawa­ Tengah­ menyambut­ baik­ kerjasama­yang­ditawarkan­oleh­KPA­(Konsorsium­Pembaruan­Agraria)­melalui­kerangka­program­SAPA­(Strategic

Alliance for Poverty Alleviation)­ untuk­ bersama­sama­mendorong­ partisipasi­ petani­ tidak­ bertanah­dalam­ pengambilan­ keputusan­ pelaksanaan­ pilot projectreforma­ agraria­ di­ Jawa­ Selatan.­ ­ Melalui­kerjasama­ini,­diharapkan­reforma­agraria­di­Propinsi­Jawa­Tengah­dapat­berjalan­semakin­baik,­sehingga­petani­ yang­ miskin­ karena­ tidak­ memiliki­ tanah­semakin­berkurang,­dan­kesejahteraan­rakyat­sebagai­tujuan­akhir­dari­reforma­agraria­dapat­tercapai.

hectares of land being redistributed to around 500 farmers.

Besides showing solid results in the form of redistribution of land, comprehensive agrarian reform, which is a combination of asset reform and access reform, has also been successfully implemented. The biggest joint-effort for access-reform was conducted under an MOU between the Head of the Land Agency and the Provincial Government of Central Java; Bank Indonesia; the Industries, Trade and Cooperatives Department; Animal Husbandry Department; Regency Government of Semarang; PT Sidomuncul; Bank BRI; Bank Jateng; PT Indolakto; PT Cimori; PT Sari Husada and PT Cita nasional. Access reform was created in the form of cluster development for herbs and dairy cattle

Stakeholder’s opinion

and cattle for meat products.Realizing the importance of having a multi-stake-

holders approach including other parties beside govern -ment agencies, the Land Agency of Central Java under Dodi worked in cooperation with the private sector and NGOs committed to land issues. The Central Java office embraced wholeheartedly an intiative to work closely with an Agrarian Reform Consortium (KPA) under the SAPA Program. Participation for non-landholding farmers towards the right of self-determination and decision making was the aim in an agrarian reform pilot project in Southern Java. It was hoped that the joint-effort would result in a decrease in the numbers of very poor farmers, and that community prosperity could be increased substantially.

16

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011Stakeholder’s opinion

Perjalanan­ hidup­ Bapak­ Kinan­ adalah­ sejarah­perkebunan­Kulonbambang­dan­gerakan­buruh­perkebunan­untuk­keluar­dari­eksploitasi­yang­

terjadi­di­perkebunan­tersebut.Eksploitasi­buruh­di­perkebunan­Kulonbambang­terjadi­dengan­masuknya­PT­ Sawit­ Guni­ Kawi.­ Petani­ yang­ pada­ awalnya­memiliki­ hak­ kepemilikan­ tanah­ di­ perkebunan­Kulonbambang,­ berbalik­ menjadi­ buruh­ karena­kepemilikan­tanah­mereka­beralih­ke­PT­Sawit­Guni­Kawi.­ ­ Masa­ ini­ ditandai­ dengan­ rendahnya­ upah­yang­ diterima­ oleh­ buruh,­ dan­ berbagai­ bentuk­diskriminasi­ lainnya.­ ­ Pada­ tahun­1999,­ upah­ yang­diterima­adalah­3500­rupiah­per­hari,­dengan­waktu­kerja­dari­pukul­06.00­hingga­pukul­14.00.­­Karyawan­perempuan­yang­hamil,­ tetap­harus­bekerja­hingga­2­minggu­ sebelum­waktu­melahirkan,­ dan­ kembali­

Kinan(Dewan Penasehat Paguyuban Petani Aryo Blitar (PPAB) & Presidium Paguyuban Warga Tani Kulonbambang)

bekerja­sebulan­setelah­melahirkan.­Agar­buruh­tidak­memiliki­ daya­ (kemampuan)­ untuk­ meninggalkan­perkebunan,­ mereka­ pun­ dibatasi­ haknya­ atas­kepemilikan­ ternak,­ untuk­ kambing­ tidak­ boleh­lebih­dari­2­ekor,­sedangkan­untuk­sapi­hanya­boleh­1­ekor.­­Anak­anak­mereka­yang­telah­menyelesaikan­SMP­ nya­ pun­ tidak­ diperbolehkan­ bekerja­ keluar­perkebunan.­ Bahkan­ pilihan­ politik­ pun­ dibatasi.­­Tidak­ ada­ karyawan­ yang­ diperbolehkan­ memilih­selain­ memilih­ partai­ politik­ yangberkuasa­ pada­saat­itu.­­Sanksi­bagi­yang­memiliki­pilihan­berbeda­adalah­pengusiran.­ ­Maka­pekerjaan­ sebagai­buruh­perkebunan­adalah­pekerjaan­turun­temurun.­­

Diskriminasi­ yang­dialami­ terus­menerus,­ serta­beban­ harus­ memikul­ anggapan­ bahwa­ menjadi­orang­ persil­ bodoh,­ miskin­ dan­ tidak­ berdaulat,­menimbulkan­dorongan­dalam­diri­Bapak­Kinan­untuk­mulai­memperjuangkan­hak­buruh­perkebunan­agar­mereka­dapat­menjadi­pemilik­tanah­yang­memiliki­kedaulatan.­ ­ Perjuangan­ tersebut­ tidak­ mudah,­tantangan­datang­tidak­hanya­dari­pihak­perkebunan,­tetapi­juga­dari­para­buruh­yang­merasa­takut.­

Kinan (Member of Advisory Board Aryo Blitar Farmers Club, member of Presidium of Kulonbambang Farming Club

Kinan’s lifestory is the history of Kulonbambang Plantation and plantation worker movement to come out from the exploitation that occurs

there. Exploitation on plantation workers started to take place when PT Sawit Guni Kawi entered the picture. The company began exploiting worker farmers. Farmers who were orginally landholders of their own estate in Kulonbambang were turned into laborers to work the land now held by the company. Wholesale exploitation was evident in the very low wages the workers received, besides many other forms of discrimination. In 1999, a

field laborer received a salary of Rp 3,500 a day, with working hours from 06.00 am to 2 pm. Pregnant female workers had to work til at least two weeks before the expected due date and were expected to return to work one month after giving birth. To disenfranchise the workers, the company limited the right to ownership of animals. One person could not own more than two goats, and only one head of cattle. Their children who had reached middle school were not allowed to work outside the plantation. If the offspring did dare to work outside, the parents would be dismissed from the plantation. Even their political aspirations were stunted. All worker farmers were to vote for the ruling party at the time. Sanction was swift and cruel: dismissal from the plantation. Work in the area then became a family affair, going down from parents to offsprings.

17

SAPA NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011 Stakeholder’s opinion

Berbagai­cara­ditempuh­untuk­memperjuangkan­kedaulatan­ mereka­ melalui­ kepemilikan­ tanah,­mulai­dari­berunjuk­rasa,­menduduki­kantor­DPRD­dan­Kantor­Pemkab­Blitar,­hingga­menduduki­tanah­dengan­cara­menanam­jagung­dll­hingga­membangun­rumah­di­atasnya,­agar­tanah­tersebut­tidak­diambil­oleh­pihak­perkebunan.­Setelah­melalui­perjuangan­panjang,­akhirnya­DPRD­mengeluarkan­rekomendasi­bahwa­beberapa­persen­dari­tanah­sengketa­menjadi­milik­masyarakat.­Dan­akhirnya­melalui­sidang­land reform,­ diputuskan­ bahwa­ tanah­ tersebut­ menjadi­milik­masyarakat.­

Dari­cerita­perjalanan­hidup­Bapak­Kinan­dapat­ditarik­ benang­ merah­ bahwa­ kepemilikan­ tanah­penting­bagi­kaum­miskin­(yang­diwakili­oleh­buruh­perkebunan)­ untuk­ keluar­ dari­ kemiskinan­ karena­tanah­membuat­mereka­ berdaulat.­ ­Walaupun­ hak­tersebut­ membutuhkan­ perjuangan­ yang­ panjang,­dengan­ kesolidan­ para­ buruh­ yang­ terorganisir,­buah­manislah­ yang­mereka­peroleh.­ ­ Seperti­ yang­diceritakan­oleh­Bapak­Kinan,­apa­yang­mereka­raih­saat­ini,­tidak­terlepas­dari­peran­KPA­(Konsorsium­

Pembaruan­Agraria)­yang­mendampingi­Bapak­Kinan­selama­memperjuangkan­hak­para­buruh.­­

Sebagai­salah­satu­pelaksana­program­SAPA­(Stra­tegic Alliance for Poverty Alleviation),­KPA­me­lakukan­berbagai­ upaya­ untuk­ mendorong­ partisipasi­ orga­nisasi­organisasi­petani­dalam­pengambilan­kepu­tusan­dalam­rangka­pelaksanaan­reforma­agraria,­yang­salah­satu­daerah­pendampingan­mereka­adalah­Blitar.

The unfair practices and treatments of workers as if they were down and out, dumb beings with no dignity and sovereignity pushed a button in Kinan’s heart to fight for his and his friends’ rights to get their landholdings back. This of course was not an easy path, as Kinan did not only have to face the company, he had to negotiate with his frightened colleague workers.

The workers tried every avenue to take back their land ownership. They picketed, organized sit down demonstrations at the parliament hall and the Blitar government office. They planted corn instead of the required plants, and even went so far as to build houses on the plantation land to symbolize the original ownership. After much frustration, the local parliament issued a recommendation that a certain percentage of the land should be given back to the community. Finally,

through a land reform hearing, the land was returned to the people.

Kinan’s story shows how important it is for the very poor to have ownership of the land they work on in order for them to come out of poverty and regain their human dignity. Even though their struggle was long and arduous, workers who organize themselves proved that their struggles can be immensely worthwhile. Kinan has pointed out that they would not have won without the support of the KPA who provided him with information on his rights thorugh every step of the struggle.

As one of the SAPA implementors, KPA takes every effort to push for participatory action by farmers in the agrarian reform decision making processes. This is highly evident in the fight taken up by the farmer workers of Blitar.

18

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011news from SaPa

Sebagai­salah­satu­wujud­kepedulian­dan­ko­mit­men­ Program­ SAPA­ terhadap­ upaya­ penang­gulang­an­ kemiskinan­ di­ daerah,­ dibentuklah­

Re source Center­ Penanggulangan­ Kemiskinan­ di­15­ ka­bu­­paten/kota­ yang­ menjadi­ wilayah­ kerja­Program­SAPA.­ ­ Setelah­melalui­ tahapan­persiapan­be­­rupa­ penyediaan­ data­ kemiskinan­ yang­ menjadi­sa­­lah­satu­menu­yang­disajikan­dalam­Resource Cen­ter,­maka­dilakukanlah­peresmiannya­di­kelima­be­las­kabupaten/kota­ tersebut,­ yang­ditandai­de­ngan­penyerahan­data­kepada­Resource Center­ yang­ber­kedudukan­ di­ Sekretariat­ Tim­ Koordinasi­ Pe­nang­­­gulangan­ Kemiskinan­ Daerah­ (TKPKD).­ Jenis­ data­

Launching Resource Center

Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di 15 Kabupaten/Kota lokasi Program SaPa

yang­disediakan­Resource Center­diantaranya:­i)­da­ta­ kemiskinan­ (pendidikan,­ kesehatan,­ penduduk,­dll);­ ii)­data­pengangguran­(pengangguran­terbuka,­pekerja­formal­&­informal,­dll);­ iii)­data­program­&­ke­­bijakan­ penanggulangan­ kemiskinan­ (Nasional,­Pro­pinsi,­dan­Kabupaten/kota);­iv)­data­alokasi­ang­garan­penanggulangan­kemiskinan­(APBD,­Dana­De­konsentrasi,­DDUB,­DAK);­v)­data­regulasi­&­kebijakan­penanggulangan­kemiskinan­(Nasional,­Propinsi,­dan­Ka­bupaten/Kota);­dan­vi)­hasil­penelitian­tentang­pe­nanggulangan­kemiskinan­di­daerah.

Kelak­Resource Center­diharapkan­dapat­menja­lan­kan­peran:­i)­mengumpulkan­data­&­Informasi­Ke­mis­kinan­dari­dinas­atau­instansi­terkait;­ii)­menge­lola­ database­ kemiskinan­ daerah;­ iii)­menganalisis­kondisi­­kemiskinan­di­daerah;­iv)­mengkaji­kebijakan­dan­program­penanggulangan­kemiskinan­daerah;­v)­memberikan­ bantuan­ teknis­ terhadap­ TKPKD­ dan­SKPD­dalam­penyusunan­ kebijakan­&­ program­pe­nang­gulangan­ kemiskinan;­ dan­ vi)­ sebagai­ wadah­per­­tukaran­ informasi­ kemiskinan­ antar­ pemangku­

launching of Poverty alleviation resource centers in SaPa’s 15 Best Practice cities/regencies

As part and parcel of the SAPA Program’s com-mitment to take part in the effort to alleviate poverty in the regions, Poverty Alleviation

Centers have now been created in 15 Cities/Regencies where SAPA Programs have been established. After going through preparation steps involving compilation of data on poverty, the fifteen Resource Centers were inaugurated, marked by submission of the said data to the Centers based in each Local Poverty Alleviation Coordination Team, known as the TKPKD.

The type of data available in each Resource Center include: i) data on poverty (encompassing education, health, population, etc.); ii) data on unemployment

(open unemployments, formal workforce, infomal workforce, etc); iii) data on poverty alleviation programs and policies (at the national, provincial, and city/regency levels); iv) data on poverty allocation budgets (National Budget, Deconcentration Fund, DDUB, DAK); v) data on regulations and policies for poverty alleviation (at the national, provincial and city/regency levels); and, vi) research and studies on poverty alleviation efforts in the regions.

It is hoped that the Resource Centers will eventually take up the role to: i) collate data and information on Poverty from related government offices and agencies; ii) manage a database on poverty in the regions; iii) analyze poverty conditions in the areas; iv) examine regional poverty alleviation policies and regulations; v) provide technical assistance to TKPKD and SKPD in formulating policies and programs to alleviate poverty; and vi) become an information exchange center for poverty issues between stakeholders in the regions.

19

SAPA NEWSLETTER, VOLUME 1, DECEMBER 2011 news from SaPa

ke­pentingan­di­daerah.Beberapa­ daerah­ yang­ saat­ ini­ telah­ memiliki­

Re s ource Center­ yang­peresmiannya­dilakukan­oleh­Deputi­ Bidang­ Koordinasi­ Penanggulangan­ Ke­mis­kinan­Kementrian­Koordinator­Bidang­Ke­se­jahtera­an­Rakyat­ (atau­ yang­mewakili)­ sebagai­ salah­ satu­stake­­­holder­sekaligus­penggagas­Program­SAPA,­di­antaranya:

Resource Center 1. Kab.­Lombok­Tengah,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­13­Juli­2011Resource Center 2. Kab.­Serdang­Bedagai,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­15­Juli­2011Resource Center 3. Kab.Sukabumi,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­18­Juli­2011Resource Center 4. Kab.Subang,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­21­Juli­2011Resource Center5. ­Kota­Surakarta,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­28­Juli­2011Resource Center6. ­Kota­Makasar,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­29­Juli­2011

Resource Center7. ­Kota­Banda­Aceh,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­8­Agustus­2011Resource Center 8. Kab.­Gunung­Kidul,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­25­Agustus­2011Resource Center 9. Kab.Jembrana,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­12­September­2011Resource Center10. ­Kota­Kupang,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­21­September­2011Resource Center 11. Kab.Kebumen,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­24­September­2011Resource Center12. ­Kota­Tasikmalaya,­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­6­Oktober­2011Resource Center 13. Kabupaten­Garut,­yang­diresmikan­pada­tanggal­24­November­2011

Dua­ daerah­ yang­ Resource Center­nya­ belum­diresmikan­adalah­Kabupaten­Bandung­dan­Ciamis.­­Peluncuran­Resource Center­ kedua­ daerah­ tersebut­akan­ dilakukan­ pada­ akhir­ bulan­ Desember­ 2011,­sehingga­pada­akhir­tahun­ini­seluruh­lokasi­program­SAPA­telah­memiliki­Resource Center.­

Areas that now have Resource Centers officiated by the Deputy for Coordination of Poverty Alleviation under the Coordinating Ministry for Social Welfare, as one of the stakeholders and initiators of the SAPA Programs, now include among others:

The Central Lombok Regency 1. Resource Center, inaugurated on July 13, 2011The Serdang Bedagai Regency 2. Resource Center, inaugurated July 15, 2011The Sukabumi Regency 3. Resource Center, inaugurated on July 18, 2011The Subang Regency 4. Resource Center, inaugurated on July 21, 2011The Surakarta 5. Resource Center, inaugurated on July 28, 2011The Makasar 6. Resource Center, inaugurated on July 29, 2011The Banda Aceh 7. Resource Center, inaugurated on August 8, 2011

The Gunung Kidul Regency 8. Resource Center, inaugurated on August 25, 2011The Jembrana Regency 9. Resource Center, inaugurated on September 12, 2011The Kupang 10. Resource Center, inaugurated on September 21, 2011The Kebumen Regency 11. Resource Center, inaugurated on September 24, 2011The Tasikmalaya 12. Resource Center, inaugurated on October 6, 2011The Garut Regency 13. Resource Center, inaugurated on November 24, 2011

The two remaining areas that have not yet had their Resource Centers inaugurated are Bandung and Ciamis Regencies. Officiation of these two Resource Centers are scheduled to take place this December, so that by year’s end, all the locales where the SAPA Program operates will have their own resource centers.

20

SAPA NEWSLETTER, EDISI 1, DESEMBER 2011news from SaPa

Bapak­Sujana­Royat­(Deputi­Bidang­Koordinasi­Penanggulanan­Kemiskinan­dan­Pemberdayaan­Masyarakat­Kemenko­Kesra)­meresmikan­RC­Kab.Subang.

Bapak­Hadi­Santoso­(Asisten­Deputi­Bidang­Pengarusutamaan­Kebijakan­dan­Penganggaran,­Kemenko­Kesra)­dan­Bapak­Dicky­Chandra­(Wakil­Bupati­Garut­yang­juga­Ketua­TKPKD­Kab.Garut)­meresmikan­RC­Kab.­Garut.