sample report write up

7/30/2019 Sample Report Write Up

1/39

Contents

1. BUILDING DESCRIPTION : ...................................................................................................................... 2

2. SKETCHES AND DRAWINGS: .................................................................................................................. 2

3. DESIGN CRITERIA AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATION: .............................................................................. 7

4. DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS: ........................................................................................................................ 8

4.1. Assumptions made during First Stage: .......................................................................................... 8

4.2. Assumptions made during Second Stage: ..................................................................................... 8

5. DESIGN VALIDATION: ............................................................................................................................ 8

5.1. Objective : ..................................................................................................................................... 8

5.2. Section properties considered for validation:............................................................................... 9

5.3. Applied loads and Boundary conditions: .................................................................................... 13

5.4. 1D- RESULTS : .............................................................................................................................. 15

5.5. Discussion on 1D element results ............................................................................................... 29

5.6. 3D RESULTS ................................................................................................................................. 30

5.7. Discussion on 1D element results ............................................................................................... 39


2/39

1.BUILDING DESCRIPTION :Width (I/I) = 25330 mmLength (column C/C) = 129720 mmBay spacing = 5@7560 + 8000 + 2@7500 + 8000 + 7@7560 +8000Clear height at side wall = 19500 mm

2.SKETCHES AND DRAWINGS:


3/39


4/39


5/39


6/39


7/39

3.DESIGN CRITERIA AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATION:MATERIAL STD YIELD

STRENGTH TENSILESTRENGTH COMPONENTSASTM A 572 GR50 345 MPA 450 MPA CONNECTOR ANGLE, SHOE, FRAME/TOP-AISLECONNECTOR PLATESASTM A 1011/ 570 GR50 345MPA 450 MPA UPRIGHTS, CROSS BEAMS, FRAME BRACINGS, SPLICEIS 4923 210 MPA 410 MPA FRAME CONNECTORSASTM A 325 M

660 MPA

830 MPA

FASTNERS, EXPANSION BOLTS

IS2016 WASHERSIS 2062 240 MPA 410 MPA BRACE RODS (PLAN, AISLE, SPINE)


8/39

4.DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS:During the validation of SANATAN Plant layout, the following assumptions are made in order to simplify or

make the validation more conservative.

Design validation carried out at two stages. In first stage, the whole plant was modeled with equivalent 1-

Dimensional BEAM element with appropriate Cross-sectional properties. In Second stage, the sub-model of

plant is modeled with 2-Dimensional SHELL elements with appropriate thickness properties.

4.1. Assumptions made during First Stage:- To be conservative the weakest section properties considered for modeling all components in SANTAN Plant

-Section properties calculated at C.G of the weakest section for each component

-Complete plant layout is modeled as three blocks and rested on uprights with fixed boundary condition [all

DOF constrained]

-Shoe is not considered during 1D element analysis [BEAM model]

-Live loads and Seismic loads distributed at the joint location of Upright and Box beams on which pallets are

mounted

4.2. Assumptions made during Second Stage:-Connections between various components are modeled with rigid elements

-Components are placed at the original position and orientation in assembly condition

-Live loads are applied over the top surface of box beam, in the form of uniformly distributed load [pressure]

-Seismic loads are applied at the rigid elements used to model the joints between uprights and box-beams

5.DESIGN VALIDATION:5.1. Objective :

To validate the structural design proposed by Kirby after analysis of the same with live load and dead load

with seismicloads applied following the code book IS-1893.The proposed structure was already in accordance with the EN 155512, EN 15620.(please correct the content accordingly to maintain a standard).


9/39

5.2. Section properties considered for validation:


10/39


11/39


12/39


13/39

5.3. Applied loads and Boundary conditions:


14/39


15/39

5.4. 1D- RESULTS :


16/39


17/39


18/39


19/39


20/39


21/39


22/39


23/39


24/39


25/39


26/39


27/39


28/39


29/39

5.5. Discussion on 1D element resultsTo be discussed before finalizing


30/39

5.6. 3D RESULTS


31/39


32/39


33/39


34/39


35/39


36/39


37/39


38/39


39/39

5.7. Discussion on 1D element resultsTo be discussed before finalizing

sample report write up

Documents