sagar kale shalegasthesis
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
1/130
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA
GRADUATE COLLEGE
PETROPHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BARNETT SHALE PLAY
A THESIS
SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the
Degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
BY
SAGAR KALE
Norman, Oklahoma
2009
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
2/130
PETROPHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF BARNETT SHALE PLAY
A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE
MEWBOURNE SCHOOL OF PETROLEUM AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING
BY
Dr. Chandra Rai, Chair
Dr. Carl Sondergeld
Dr. Richard Sigal
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
3/130
Copyright by SAGAR KALE 2009
All Rights Reserved.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
4/130
To my parents and sister for their motivation & constant support and to my wife for
her encouragement and patience
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
5/130
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to begin by expressing sincere gratitude to the members of my committee,
Dr. Chandra Rai, Dr. Carl Sondergeld and Dr. Richard Sigal, for their constructive
criticism and invaluable advice. I thank them for regularly taking time off their busy
schedule for evaluating my work at every stage. A successful completion of this work
wouldnt have been possible without their help. I also thank Dr. Deepak Devegowda
for his help with the cluster analysis exercise.
I would like to express sincere thanks to Mr. Gary Stowe and Mr. Bruce Spears for
teaching me how to operate various equipments at Integrated Core Characterization
Center. I also thank Mr. Moin Khan for helping me make the petrophysical
measurements on Barnett shale samples. My thanks to fellow graduate students,
undergraduate students at IC3
lab as well as the faculty and the staff at Mewbourne
School of Petroleum and Geological Engineering for their help all through my
Masters.
Last but not the least, I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to my parents and
my sister who believed in me and encouraged me to take up higher studies. I can not
thank them enough for their selfless love and affection. My accomplishments so far
are as much theirs as they are mine. I take this opportunity to say a big Thank you to
my wife, Dhanashree, who has been a constant source of inspiration throughout my
work.
Sagar Kale
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
6/130
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES ..viii
LIST OF TABLES .....xii
ABSTRACT ...xiii
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1Natural gas industry in USA 1
1.2Introduction to shales and their importance as a resource ...2
1.3 Challenges in petrophysical characterization of shale gas play ...5
1.4 Purpose and scope of the study 6
1.5 Geology of Barnett shaleFort Worth basin ..7
2. LITERATURE REVIEW .12
2.1 Definition of mudrocks and shales .12
2.2 Mineralogy and clay structure ....13
2.3 Kerogen and its types .16
2.4 Total organic carbon and thermal maturity 18
2.5 LECO Method for estimating TOC .. .21
2.6 Rock-Eval pyrolysis/oxidation technique for estimating TOC and thermal
maturity 22
2.7 Vitrinite reflectance measurement .26
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
7/130
vi
2.8 Geochemical data reported in Barnett shale ...27
2.9 Rock typing techniques ..28
2.9.1 Rock Quality Index (RQI) and Flow Zone Indicator (FZI)
technique for rock typing .28
2.9.2 Winlands R35 approach ..30
2.9.3 Pitmans modification of Winlands approach...30
2.9.4 Prediction of permeability from Hg injection data .31
2.10 Rock type through Principal Component and Cluster Analysis ..35
2.10.1 Principal Component analysis ...35
2.10.2 Cluster analysis .36
3. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE ...37
3.1 Sampling procedure . ..37
3.2 Helium porosity, bulk and grain volume measurement .38
3.3 FTIR mineralogy ....41
3.4 Mercury injection capillary pressure measurement ...44
3.5 Total organic carbon (TOC) measurement 51
4. OBSERVATION AND RESULTS ...53
4.1 Helium porosity .53
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
8/130
vii
4.2 FTIR mineralogy 54
4.3 Total organic carbon (TOC) and thermal maturity 60
4.4 Mercury injection capillary pressure measurement ...62
4.5 Classification of lithofacies 66
4.6 Rock typing 70
4.7 Rock typing through Principal Component & Cluster analysis .78
4.8 SEM study of rock types 88
4.9 Correlation of petrofacies with production data .90
4.10 Summary of observations and results ..94
4.11 Field Applications 97
5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...98
5.1 Conclusions 98
5.2 Recommendations ..99
REFERENCES .......101
APPENDIXA ..106
APPENDIXB ..112
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
9/130
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
1.1 Production from six major shale plays from United States over last ten years (NCI,
2008) .. 3
1.2 Number of producing wells each year in Barnett shale and timeline of major
modifications in drilling and completion techniques (Martineau, 2007) ...4
1.3 Map of Barnett shale play showing geographic, tectonic features and variation in
thickness of Barnett shale (Pollastro, 2003) ...8
1.4 Location map of study wells (Modified after Singh, 2008) ...10
1.5 Generalized stratigraphic column and stratigraphic subdivision of Barnett shale
(Modified after Pollastro, 2003 and Montgomery et al., 2005)11
2.1 Sheet structure of illite (Grim, 1968) .14
2.2 Sheet structure of smectite (Grim, 1968) ...15
2.3 Sheet structure of kaolinite (Grim, 1968) ..16
2.4 Model of organic carbon distribution (Jarvie, 1991) .19
2.5 Conversion of convertible organic matter into EOM and secondary cracking of oil
into gas with increasing thermal maturation (Modified after Jarvie, 2004) .21
2.6 Van Krevelen diagram (Emeis and Kvenvolden, 1986) ........................................24
2.7 Three Stages in Rock-Eval Pyrolysis (Modified after Jarvie, 2004) ..................25
2.8 Change in color and vitrinite reflectivity with increasing thermal maturation in
Barnett shale samples (Modified after Jarvie, 2004) ...26
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
10/130
ix
3.1 Barnett shale core images ..38
3.2 Histogram showing particle size distribution 40
3.3 Plasma asher setup for removing organic matter from the sample before FTIR
mineralogy measurement .44
3.4 Cumulative Hg intrusion plot showing real and false intrusion .47
3.5 Penetrometer and its components ......49
3.6 AutoPore IV machine used for running mercury injection measurement ..50
4.1 Histogram showing porosity variation of the dataset .....53
4.2 Waterfall chart showing mineralogy variation in all four wells 54
4.3 Contribution of each carbonate to overall carbonate content averaged over entire
dataset ...56
4.4 Contribution of each clay mineral to overall clay content averaged over entire
dataset ...57
4.5 Average mineral composition and standard deviation of the entire dataset ...57
4.6 Porosity variation with calcite content ...58
4.7 TOC variation with calcite content 59
4.8 Histogram showing calcite variation of the dataset ...60
4.9 Histogram showing TOC variation of the dataset ..61
4.10 Incremental and cumulative mercury intrusionplot for type A samples ..63
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
11/130
x
4.11 Incremental and cumulative mercury intrusion plot for type B samples ...63
4.12 Incremental and cumulative mercury intrusion plot for type C samples ...64
4.13 Lithofacies occurrence for the dataset ..67
4.14 Average porosity, TOC and calcite content of each lithofacies ...68
4.15 Average porosity, TOC and calcite content of three petrofacies .74
4.16 Porosity - TOC plot for all the samples from well C and well D ...75
4.17 Relationship between Hg rock types and petrofacies ..77
4.18 Relationship between principal components and percentage variance they explain
(11 variable case)..80
4.19 Pairwise scatterplot showing relationship of variables with each other and with
the three principal components (11 variable case)81
4.20 Relationship between principal components and percentage variance they explain
(5 variable case)83
4.21 Pairwise scatterplot showing relationship of variables with each other and with
the three principal components (5 variable case)......84
4.22 Average porosity, TOC and calcite content of three clusters ...87
4.23 Secondary electron image of petrofacies 1 sample using environmental scanning
electron microscope .88
4.24 Secondary electron image of petrofacies 2 sample using environmental scanning
electron microscope .89
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
12/130
xi
4.25 Secondary electron image of petrofacies 3 sample using environmental scanning
electron microscope .89
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
13/130
xii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1 Thermal maturity data for all four wells ..61
Table 4.2 Porosity and TOC data for three Hg rock types ...69
Table 4.3 Mineralogy data for three Hg rock types .69
Table 4.4 Porosity and TOC data for three petrofacies 73
Table 4.5 Mineralogy data for three petrofacies ..73
Table 4.6 One to one correspondence betweenpetrofacies and Hg rock types ...78
Table 4.7 Porosity and TOC data for three clusters .85
Table 4.8 Mineralogy data for three clusters ...85
Table 4.9 Relationship between clusters, petrofacies and Hg rock types 87
Table 4.10 Comparison of production data with petrofacies 1 thickness 91
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
14/130
xiii
ABSTRACT
With the contribution of shale gas towards the overall natural gas production in North
America increasing steadily, petrophysical characterization of these unconventional
plays has become extremely important for identifying sweet spots in the reservoir.
However; conventional techniques of rock typing, based on porosity permeability
cross-plots, do not work in shales due to a lack of dynamic range for these parameters
and the difficulties involved in a direct permeability measurement. In this exercise,
rock typing has been attempted by integrating geological core description with the
petrophysical measurements.
Petrophysical measurements are made on shale plugs recovered from four wells from
different parts of the Newark East field. Measurements of porosity, mineralogy and
total organic carbon (TOC) are made on approximately 800 plugs. Mercury injection
capillary pressure measurements are done on approximately 130 plugs to obtain a
dataset of petrophysical parameters for rock typing.
Based on core description, Singh (2008) identified 10 distinct lithofacies in the Barnett
shale that represented unique geological settings at the time of deposition. However,
she did not rank the lithofacies in terms of their importance towards gas production. I
have tried to bridge the gap between the geological core description and the well
productivity by supplementing the geological core description with the petrophysical
description of the core.
From the petrophysical measurements on the samples from all ten lithofacies, it is
observed that some of these lithofacies have similar petrophysical properties. That
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
15/130
xiv
presents an opportunity of combining them into fewer groups so that each group has
unique petrophysical properties. These groups are termed as petrofacies. Even
though the petrofacies have a narrow dynamic range for some of the petrophysical
parameters, they are distinct in terms of their calcite content. Porosity and TOC also
show a strong correlation with calcite as both of them decrease with increasing calcite
content.
Based on porosity, TOC and calcite content, I have reduced the 10 lithofacies into 3
petrofacies Samples from petrofacies 1 have 0-10% wt. calcite content with a porosity
range of 6.0-6.3% (average 6.1%) and a TOC of 4.7-5.0%. Petrofacies 2, with 10-25%
wt. calcite, has a porosity range of 5.8-6.3% (average 6.0%) with a TOC 3.4-3.8%.
Petrofacies-3, with over 25% wt. calcite, has a porosity range of 3.4-4.0% (average
3.7%) and a TOC from 1.6-1.9%.
After ranking the petrofacies on the basis of their petrophysical properties, it is
observed that petrofacies 1 represents calcite lean reservoir rock (
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
16/130
xv
long and nearly continuous intervals of petrofacies 1, over the perforated zone,
produces better than the well where petrofacies 1 is discontinuous and separated by
thick intervals of petrofacies 2 and 3 over the perforated zone. This proves that
petrofacies 1 not only has the best petrophysical properties; it is a better gas producer
as well.
Petrofacies 1 represents the best reservoir rock in the field.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
17/130
1
Chapter1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Natural gas industry in USA:
The importance of natural gas in the energy industry has increased steadily. Relative
abundance of natural gas and its clean burning characteristics make it a very attractive
energy resource. Natural gas finds extensive use in residential and commercial
applications, for power generation and as an alternative transportation fuel.
However for a very long time natural gas production was not actively pursued mainly
due to lack of infrastructure for transporting it to its end users. Natural gas associated
with oil production was considered nuisance and used to be flared. However with the
growing natural gas pipeline network, advent of specialized ships for transporting
natural gas as LNG, depleting oil reserves and stringent anti flaring regulations have
made natural gas production attractive. In United States, where extensive natural gas
pipeline network is already in place, we now see many independent operators dealing
solely with natural gas.
USA is one of the largest producers of natural gas with annual natural gas production
of 20.6 TCF in year 2008. EIA forecasts production of 25.4 TCF by 2030 (Annual
Energy Outlook, 2009). US dry natural gas reserves are estimated as 1680 TCF as of
year-end 2007 with over 40% contribution coming from unconventional resources
such as tight gas sands, shale gas and coal bed methane. Shale gas alone contributes
274 TCF, over 16% of total reserves. However some estimate that this value can be as
high as 842 TCF, over 37% of total reserves. (NCI, 2008)
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
18/130
2
1.2 Introduction to shales and their importance as a resource:
Shales are defined as laminated sediments containing very fine grade (less than 4
micron in size) particles predominantly made of clays. Shales are the most common
sedimentary rocks in the earths curst and they are characterized by low porosities and
nano-darcy permeabilities. The first commercial gas well drilled in USA was actually
producing from shales. It was drilled in 1821 in Fredonia, New York. However, for a
very long time after that, sandstones and carbonates overshadowed shales as reservoir
rocks. Shales, due to their ultra-low permeability, were only considered as geological
seals; preventing hydrocarbon escape from conventional reservoirs. They were drilled
through to reach conventional sandstone or carbonate reservoirs. Since shales were not
treated as reservoir rocks, they were never studied in detail.
However shales can serve as a source and a reservoir rock if they are rich in organic
matter. The organic matter, under anaerobic conditions, transforms into high
molecular weight polymeric compounds called kerogen due to bacterial action. At
high pressures and temperatures, kerogen transforms into liquid hydrocarbons and
further into methane depending on prevailing temperature and pressure (Tiab and
Donaldson, 2004). This gas is then either adsorbed on the surface of the organic matter
or clay, escapes through the network of natural fractures or remains within the pores of
the shale (Frantz, 2005). Shales can hold enormous amount of free and adsorbed gas,
most of which can be commercially recovered through modern drilling and completion
techniques. Fig.1.1 shows natural gas production from six major shale gas plays in
mainland USA. It can be seen that natural gas production from Barnett shale far
exceeds that from other shale plays. Barnett has grown from 94 MMSCF/day to 3
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
19/130
3
BSCF/day over last 10 years, an increase of over 3000% (NCI, 2008). This increase in
production for Barnett shale also coincides with the modification in drilling and
completion techniques as shown in Fig.1.2.
Fig.1.1: Daily gas production from six major shale gas plays in USA over last ten years (NCI, 2008);
contribution of Barnett shale to overall shale gas production in United States has steadily increased over last tenyears
Over 6200 wells, both horizontal and vertical, are completed in Barnett; producing 2
BSCF/day natural gas by September 2006. After 1997, the wells were completed with
water fracturing and sand as proppant. The horizontal wells that are 1000 to 3500 ft
long are completed with multistage hydraulic fracturing (Martineau, 2007).
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
20/130
4
Fig.1.2: Number of producing wells in Barnett with time along with start periods of major completion and
drilling events (Martineau, 2007);operators started out drilling vertical wells and fracturing them with foam orcross-linked gel in Barnett shale, by 1997 water fracturing replaced gel fracturing, by 1999 operators started
refracturing the wells that were originally gel fractured with water. It resulted into almost 60% increase inrecoverable reserves. By 2003, horizontal drilling became popular as it reduced the risk of fracturing waterbearing Ellenberger formation. Most of the drilling in Barnett since 2003 has been horizontal.
Although Barnett shale is also produced from Delaware basin in West Texas, it is the
Fort Worth basin in North-East Texas that contributes the most to overall gas
production from Barnett shale play. Data presented in Fig.1.1 and Fig.1.2 represents
Barnett shale from Fort Worth basin only.
Since shales are now considered as reservoir rocks with potential for significant gas
production; the interest in their petrophysical characterization, necessary for better
prediction of reserves and identification of gas rich zones, has grown tremendously.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
21/130
5
1.3 Challenges in petrophysical characterization of shale gas play:
Petrophysical characterization of the reservoir aims to classify the reservoir rocks into
groups with unique petrophysical parameters. Such groups are known as rock types.
Since each rock type has a distinct range of petrophysical properties, it can be used for
distinguishing good reservoir rock from bad.
In conventional sandstones, rock types are identified from porosity-permeability cross-
plots. RQI (Rock Quality Index), Winlands R35 method use these cross-plots for rock
typing. (Various methods for rock typing, reported so far, are summarized in Chapter-
2 on literature review.) However porosity and permeability values from conventional
reservoirs typically have a very wide dynamic range which makes identifying rock
types from such cross-plots very easy. Rock types so identified usually differ by an
order of magnitude in permeability and have broad range for porosity.
Rock typing from porosity-permeability cross-plots is not feasible in shale gas
reservoirs for two main reasons. First: unlike sandstones, the dynamic range for
porosity in shales is very narrow; second: shales are characterized by nano-darcy
matrix permeabilities which are few orders of magnitude lower than even tight gas
sands.
For reservoir characterization, we need a significantly large dataset of petrophysical
parameters. Generation of such a large dataset, through core plug measurement, is
expensive and time consuming. We typically overcome this problem by correlating the
rock types with the log measurements from the same interval and then use these
correlations along with logs for predicting petrophysical properties in the uncored
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
22/130
6
intervals. However in shales, rock types may have overlapping ranges for certain
petrophysical parameters; making it harder to establish such correlations. Since shales
are heterogeneous at all scales, correlations established in one part of the field often do
not hold up in the other parts.
Since the dynamic range of petrophysical properties in shales is rather narrow, it raises
a question of how important petrophysical characterization really is in these
unconventional plays. However when we look at the production profiles and well
completions in Newark East field, we observe that some part of the field produce
much better than others. This could mean that the reservoir rock is different in
different parts of the field and subtle differences in their petrophysical properties may
be responsible for this big variation in production. These subtle differences in
petrophysical properties, if captured through rock typing, can help us distinguish
between the good and the bad reservoir rock. Petrophysical characterization of shale
gas reservoir through rock typing if successfully done can provide that vital piece of
information for optimizing gas production from these unconventional resources.
1.4 Purpose and scope of the study:
This study attempts a petrophysical characterization of a Barnett shale play through
rock typing so that the sweet spots in the reservoir can be identified and targeted
through suitable completion techniques for optimal gas production. Rock typing is
based on geological core description (Singh, 2008) and the petrophysical
measurements made on approximately 800 core plugs, from four wells located in
different parts of Newark East Field at Integrated Core Characterization Center at
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
23/130
7
University of Oklahoma. The measurements made were helium porosity, FTIR
mineralogy, total organic carbon (TOC) and Hg injection capillary pressure. Rock
types so identified are observed to differ in terms of their petrophysical properties with
a little overlap. Comparison of these petrophysical properties among different rock
types helps us identify the best reservoir rock type in the field.
In order to verify that the reservoir rock type identified as a best reservoir rock is
indeed the best, we compared the production data for two wells with the thickness of
each rock type over the perforated interval of the well. The results of this comparison
are discussed under the Observations and Results (Chapter 4).
In a completely independent exercise, we attempted rock typing through principal
component and cluster analysis using a program called Efacies developed by Dr. A.
Datta-Gupta from Texas A&M University. The details of this method are reported
under Literature Review (Chapter 2). The results of this exercise are included in
Observations and Results (Chapter 4).
1.5 Geology of Barnett shaleFort Worth basin:
Fort Worth basin is a north-south elongated basin in North-East Texas. It roughly
covers 15,000 square miles (Singh, 2008). As shown in Fig.1.3, Fort Worth basin is
enclosed by Red River arch from North, Munester arch from North-East, Ouachita
thrust belt from East, Llano uplift from South and Bend arch from West. The
generalized stratigraphic column is shown in Fig.1.5. Barnett shale from Fort Worth
basin is of Mississipian age, marine shelf deposit (Shelley et al., 2008). It is black,
organic rich, calcareous shale with nanodarcy range matrix permeability (Shelly et al.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
24/130
8
2008). It is also a source rock for many conventional clastic and carbonate reservoirs
such as Pennsylvanian Bend, Strawn and Canyon groups of Fort Worth basin
(Pollastro et al., 2007). Barnett shale is therefore a fully self sustained petroleum
system that serves as a source, a seal and a reservoir rock (Jarvie, 2005).
As shown in Fig.1.3A) and Fig.1.3 B), thickness of Barnett shale in Fort Worth basin
decreases from NE-SW transect (A-A).
Fig.1.3: A) Map of US Geological Survey Province 50, Fort Worth Basin, TX, showing major tectonic
features, geographic extent of Barnett shale, lines of well log cross section A-A and B-B and contours
showing thickness of Barnett shale in the Fort Worth basin, B) Generalized NE-SW well log cross section
showing thickness of Barnett Shale, C) Generalized SE-NW well log cross section showing thickness of
Barnett Shale (Pollastro, 2003)
Barnett is almost 1000 feet thick close to Munester Arch towards North East but it
gradually decreases to 100 feet towards the South-West end of the basin. Along the
NW-SE transect (B-B), as shown in Fig. 1.3 A) and Fig. 1.3 C); Barnett is much
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
25/130
9
thinner with maximum thickness of around 300 feet and minimum thickness of around
10 feet over Chappel limestone shelf.
Our focus in this study is on Newark East field, a mature gas field located in the
North-East region of the basin, closer to Munester Arch where the thickness of Barnett
shale is probably the highest. The core area (Highlighted with green in Fig.1.4) of this
filed is located in Denton, Wise and Tarrant county; however the field also extends
into Parker county. The 4 cored well studied and discussed in this thesis are marked on
Fig.1.4. Two of these four wells (Well A and Well B) are in the core producing
area, towards the right of Viola Pinchout, where Barnett is sandwiched between two
carbonate formations with Marble Falls on the top and Viola at the bottom. Here
Barnett is also subdivided into two producing intervals, upper and lower by another
carbonate rich interval called Forestburg. Forestburg thickness varies from 20 feet to
150 feet (Shelley et al., 2008). Forestburg thinning is observed from NE to SW before
it completely disappears in the extended part of the field as shown in Fig.1.5.
In the extended part of the field, towards the left of Viola Pinchout, the formation
overlying Barnett is still Marble Falls but the underlying formation is Ellenberger
limestone.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
26/130
10
Fig.1.4: Map showing the core area of Newark East Field, Viola Pinchout and approximate locations ofcored wells studied in this thesis (Modified after Singh, 2008); area shaded in green represents original corearea of production in Barnett shale play. Two of the cored wells (Well A and Well B) included in this study
are from the core area. They are vertical wells. Well C and well D are from the extended area and they are
horizontal wells.
Well A Well BWell C
Well D
Well A Well BWell C
Well D
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
27/130
11
Fig.1.5: (A) Generalized stratigraphic column (Modified after Pollastro, 2003). (B) Stratigraphic subdivisionof Barnett shale and details of formations overlying and underlying Barnett shale at different locations along
NE-SW transect (Modified after Montgomery et al., 2005)
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
28/130
12
Chapter2
LITERATURE REVIEW
With the introduction of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling, the number of
completions and overall gas production from Barnett shale has increased exponentially
over last ten years. Since 2001, Barnett shale has been the largest contributor to
overall shale gas production in United States (see Fig. 1.1).
In spite of the growing interest in shales, our understanding of these unconventional
gas plays is still limited. The aim of this chapter is to review the state of knowledge on
shale gas plays in general and Barnett shale in particular.
The chapter describes the structure, the mineral composition and the geochemistry of
shales. It details the techniques for TOC and thermal maturity measurements and also
summarizes the geochemical measurements reported on Barnett shale. The chapter
covers various rock typing techniques reported on conventional reservoir rocks and
explains why they do not work in shales. It concludes by providing a brief summary
on principal component and cluster analysis techniques used for identifying rock
types.
2.1 Definition of mudrocks and shales:
Mudrocks are siliclastic sedimentary rocks, made up of silt sized particles (0.0625 to
0.0039 mm) and clay sized particles that are even finer (< 0.0039 mm). They are the
most common class of sedimentary rocks constituting 50-80% of earths sedimentary
rock shell (Prothero and Schwab, 2004). Shales are a class of mudrocks that exhibit
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
29/130
13
laminations, fissility along the bedding planes and are predominantly made up of clay
sized particles. Shales are believed to be deposited under low energy environment
where weak currents carry flake shaped mica and clay minerals without too much
abrasion. Shales therefore exhibit a preferred fabric caused by the preferential
alignment of flaky mica and clay minerals into thin, parallel sheets. The thickness of
these parallel sheets can range anywhere between 0.5 mm to 10 mm (Prothero and
Schwab, 2004). This sheet like fabric/bedding plane is responsible for the fissility in
shales. They are observed to split or peal off along the bedding plane very easily.
2.2 Mineralogy and clay structure:
Clays are the dominant minerals in shales with illite, kaolinite, smectite, chlorite being
the most common clays. Clays have two basic building blocks which can be used to
construct most of the clay minerals. The first is a tetrahedral silicate sheets with
oxygen ions at the corners. The second is an octahedral arrangement where hydroxyl
ions occupy the corners and surround calcium, magnesium or aluminum ions. Most of
the clays are composed of sandwiches of these building blocks repeated over and over.
Most of the clays exhibit 2:1 or three sheet sandwich structures, in which an
aluminum-hydroxyl octahedral sheet is sandwiched between two oxygen-silicon
tetrahedral sheets. The cations present in these sandwiches are responsible for the
variation in clays. Illite is the most abundant clay mineral. It is potassium rich 2:1 clay
that has an octahedral sheet (where K+ has replaced Al+3 as cation) sandwiched
between two tetrahedral sheets (where silicon is sometimes substituted by aluminum)
(see Fig. 2.1). The presence of potassium ion provides the structure with strong ionic
bonding, preventing water from percolating through and clay from swelling (Prothero
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
30/130
14
and Schwab, 2004). Smectites on the other hand have small amount of Mg+2
ion
substituting Al+3 ion in the octahedral structure resulting into slightly negatively
charged octahedral layers (negative charge is smaller than the charge in illite). The
positive ions such as Na+, K+ and Ca+2 from interlayers balance this charge (see Fig.
2.2). Since the net charge in smectites is lower than illite, water is readily absorbed in
the interlayers which makes the smectite structure expandable (Prothero and Schwab,
2004). They are known to double in volume when they absorb water. Chlorites too
have 2:1 sheet structure with the octahedral interlayer having Mg+2
and Fe+2
replacing
Al+3 at the lattice center.
Fig.2.1: Sheet structure of illite (Grim, 1968); potassium rich 2:1 clay with an octahedral sheet sandwichedbetween two tetrahedral sheets
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
31/130
15
Fig.2.2: Sheet structure of smectite (Grim, 1968);2:1 sheet structure with small amount of Mg+2 substituting
Al+3 in the octahedral sheet
Kaolinite on the other hand has a much simpler structure with one tetrahedral sheet
and one octahedral sheet in each repeating layer (see Fig. 2.3). These layers are tightly
bonded together by hydrogen as cation. Unlike most other clays, kaolinites lack space
for water, hydroxyl or larger cations between the layers (Prothero and Schwab, 2004).
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
32/130
16
Fig.2.3: Sheet structure of kaolinite (Grim, 1968); simple sheet structure with one tetrahedral sheet and one
octahedral sheet in repeating layers
Natural clays are often observed as regular or random mixtures of multiple clay types.
They are termed as mixed clays with the mixture of illite-montmorillonite being the
most common. In addition to clays, other minerals such as quartz, feldspar, carbonates
(calcite, dolomite, siderite and aragonite), pyrites, apatites and anhydrite are also
found in shales. FTIR mineralogy technique (Explained in Chapter 3), used for
mineralogy measurement of Barnett shale samples at Integrated Core Characterization
Center, can determine the presence of these minerals along with their quantities in
weight percentages.
2.3 Kerogen and its types:
Shale plays rich in organic matter are the only once with commercial importance. It is
the organic matter in shale that makes it a source rock. Organic matter in shale is in a
form of kerogen. Kerogen is a product of anaerobic decomposition of organic matter
from dead plants and animals. At deeper burial depths, high temperature and high
pressure convert these decomposition products into high molecular weight polymeric
compounds of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. They are called kerogen.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
33/130
17
As the sediments get buried deeper, they encounter increased pressures and
temperatures that induces further reactions; transforming the kerogen through liquid
bitumen into liquid petroleum product (Tiab and Donaldson, 2004). If oil produced
this way stays trapped in a source rock, the overburden and the high temperature at
deeper depths results in cracking of oil into gas.
The type of hydrocarbons produced depends on the kerogen type. Type I kerogen is
deposited in a relatively quite and calm lacustrine environment (deposition in lakes)
(Tissot, 1984). It is derived primarily from algal matter and it has undergone
considerable modification due to microorganisms residing in the sediment. In terms of
elemental composition, type I kerogens are known to have high hydrogen to carbon
ratio (>1.3) and low oxygen to carbon ratio (
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
34/130
18
2.4 Total organic carbon and thermal maturity:
The extent of organic matter inside a sample is characterized by a term called Total
Organic Carbon or TOC. TOC values are reported in terms of weight percentage of
organic carbon; meaning 1% wt. TOC represents 1 gm of organic carbon in 100 gm of
sediment sample (Jarvie, 1991). TOC is composed of three components. It has 1.
Extractable organic matter (EOM) 2. Convertible carbon and 3. Residual carbon
fraction or dead carbon. Extractable organic matter represents organic carbon present
as oil and gas that is already been produced but not yet expelled. Convertible carbon
represents that fraction of TOC which has the potential to transform into oil and gas.
Under right pressure and temperature conditions, this part of the TOC would transform
itself into bitumen then into oil and finally into gas. Residual carbon fraction
represents that part of the organic matter which has no potential to generate oil and gas
because of its low hydrogen content per unit of organic carbon. As convertible carbon
transforms itself into oil and gas, it leaves behind a dead residue; increasing the
residual carbon fraction of TOC. Fig.2.4 shows the organic carbon distribution in
sediment sample. The picture shows all three constituents of TOC.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
35/130
19
Fig.2.4: Model of organic carbon distribution (Jarvie 1991; adapted and modified from Espitalie, 1982);
TOC is made up of oil and gas already produced and kerogen which accounts for organic matter capable ofproducing oil and gas and dead carbon.
From Fig.2.4, it can be seen that for a commercial gas accumulation to take place,
having only high TOC is insufficient. High TOC also needs to be complemented by
high thermal maturation to ensure that convertible carbon has seen high temperatures
and pressures necessary for its transformation into commercially valuable oil and gas
products. At sufficiently high temperatures, the oil produced is known to undergo
secondary cracking and transform into gas. Secondary cracking depends on the
temperatures reached and the composition of oil. In Barnett shale formation, it is
known to take place at temperatures beyond 150oC (302
oF) (Jarvie, 2004).
During thermal maturation of organic carbon, TOC of the sample stays unchanged;
however the contribution of each component to TOC undergoes a change. As shown
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
36/130
20
in Fig. 2.5, when an immature shale sample, capable of producing oil and gas (i.e.
having convertible carbon) undergoes thermal maturation, convertible carbon
transforms into oil, gas and leaves behind carbon residue or dead carbon. This results
into increase of EOM as well as residual carbon and decrease of convertible carbon.
The oil and gas produced often undergo periodic expulsion as the pressure builds up
during the process of thermal maturation and sources hydrocarbons to conventional
reservoir rocks with good storage and flow characteristics.
However in Barnett shale and other shale plays of commercial importance, the gas
produced is known to stay behind in the source rock instead of being expelled. Jarvie
et al. (2007) propose two main mechanisms of gas storage in a source rock: 1. Gas
stays behind in a source rock in a sorbed state (absorbed and adsorbed) to or within the
organic matrix; with organic richness, kerogen type and maturity impacting the
sorptive capacity. 2. As a free gas in pore spaces and fractures; created either by
organic matter decomposition or other diagenetic or tectonic processes (Jarvie et al.,
2007). It has also been reported that, in Barnett shale, reservoir rocks with high TOC
and high thermal maturity produce better (Jarvie, 2004); confirming that organic rich
portion of Barnett shale retains significant amount of produced gas. Therefore TOC
content and thermal maturity can be used as an indicator of a gas bearing zone. It
justifies using TOC as one of the petrophysical parameters for identifying the best
petrofacies in Barnett shale play.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
37/130
21
Fig.2.5: Conversion of convertible organic matter into oil and gas with increasing thermal maturation
(Modified after Jarvie, 2004); Thermal maturation stages of organic matter: Stage 1: A sample with highamount of convertible organic matter yet to undergo thermal maturation, Stage 2: Conversion of this organic
matter into oil and gas upon thermal maturation and increase in residual carbon, Stage 3: Continuedconversion of organic matter into oil and gas upon further maturation as well as secondary cracking of oil intogas
TOC measurements provide information about its organic richness and thermal
maturity measurement provides information about the level of maturation of the
organic matter into commercially valuable oil and gas.
The measurement techniques for estimating the TOC content of the organic matter and
the extent of its maturation are summarized below.
2.5 LECO method for estimating TOC:
LECO TOC method gives a measure of the total organic carbon present in a sample.
This technique requires about 1 gm of crushed sample (Jarvie, 1991). In this method,
inorganic carbon in the form of carbonates is separated from the organic matter by
soaking the sample in HCl for 12 to 16 hours with intermittent stirring. Carbonates
Convertible CarbonDead
Carbon
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
EOM Carbon
Convertible
Carbon
Dead
Carbon
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
EOM Carbon
Convertible
Carbon
Dead Carbon
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
EOM Carbon
Gas Oil
OilGas
Gas Oil
IncreaseinThermalMaturity
&
SecondaryCrackingof
Oil Convertible Carbon
Dead
Carbon
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
EOM Carbon
Convertible
Carbon
Dead
Carbon
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
EOM Carbon
Convertible
Carbon
Dead Carbon
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
EOM Carbon
Gas Oil
OilGas
Gas Oil
IncreaseinThermalMaturity
&
SecondaryCrackingof
Oil
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
38/130
22
present in the sample are converted into CO2 and bubble out of HCl solution. Once the
conversion of carbonates into carbon dioxide is complete, no more effervescence from
the solution is observed. The remaining sample is then freed of HCl by rinsing it with
water. Filter paper and filtering flask is used during rinsing to avoid losing any
sample. Rest of the sample is then oxidized to convert organic carbon into carbon
dioxide. CO2 vapors are routed through an infrared detector which determines the
amount of CO2 produced and then back calculates the organic carbon present in the
sample using the material balance.
2.6 Rock-Eval pyrolysis/oxidation technique for estimating TOC and thermal
maturity:
In addition to the total organic content of the sample, this technique can determine the
kerogen type and the thermal maturity of the sample.
Rock-Eval method combines pyrolysis with oxidation cycle for complete
geochemical analysis of the sample. The sample undergoes programmed temperature
heating in a pyrolysis oven. The temperature of the oven is increased up to 300oC and
held constant to allow release of free hydrocarbons present in the sample. Free
ionization detector (FID) connected with the pyrolysis oven records the first peak
corresponding to the release of free hydrocarbons. This peak is labeled as S1.
Temperature is then gradually ramped up to 600oC at a rate of 25
oC per minute. This
results in cracking of organic matter or convertible carbon resulting into yet another
peak. The second peak recorded by FID is labeled as S2 and it corresponds to the
convertible carbon present in the sample. S1 and S2 peaks when normalized by
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
39/130
23
multiplying by 0.083 to provide estimates of EOM and convertible carbon respectively
in terms of gm of carbon per 100 gm of sample (0.083 is derived from average wt.
percent of carbon in hydrocarbons and by conversion of mg of hydrocarbon per gm of
rock or parts per thousand to parts per hundred (%)) (Jarvie, 1991). S 2 peak is also
used to determine hydrogen index (S2100/TOC) of the sample. Hydrogen index (HI),
measured in terms of mg of hydrocarbon per gm of TOC, is an indicator of the
hydrogen content per unit of organic carbon and along with oxygen index (OI)
determines the type of kerogen present. Oxygen index (OI) of the sample is
determined by allowing the sample to cool down to room temperature after pyrolysis
is complete. During cool down, the trapped CO2 is released resulting in a third peak
S3. S3 is used to determine OI (S3100/TOC) of the sample. OI is measured in terms of
mg of CO2 per gm of TOC. Knowing HI and OI, the kerogen type can be easily
determined from Van Krevelen plot as shown in Fig. 2.6.
However as kerogen undergoes thermal maturation, convertible organic carbon
transforms itself into oil and gas and hydrogen deficient residual carbon resulting into
reduction of hydrogen index. OI also decreases upon thermal maturation. Therefore,
in order to determine the kerogen type, HI and OI measurement needs to be made on a
sample with low thermal maturity (~0.6% Ro).
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
40/130
24
Fig. 2.6: Van Krevelen diagram (Emeis and Kvenvolden, 1986). Hydrogen and oxygen index cross-plot for
estimating kerogen type of the source rock; Type I kerogens have HI greater than 600 and OI less than 50when they are thermally immature, Type II kerogens tend have HI in between 200 and 600 when thermallyimmature, Type III kerogens are characterized by OI that can be as high as 160 and HI under 200 when
thermally immature. As samples undergo thermal maturation, both HI and OI of the sample decrease.
The temperature corresponding with S2 peak is called as Tmax and it is a measure of
thermal maturity of the sample. Any sample with Tmax less than 430oC is considered
thermally immature. Samples with Tmax between 430-450oC are considered thermally
mature and in oil or wet gas window and the samples with Tmax over 450oC are
considered to be in gas window (Emeis and Kvenvolden, 1986).
The TOC value used for normalizing S2 and S3 peaks can be determined independently
or can be obtained from Rock-Eval measurement itself. In a direct measurement of
TOC using Rock-Eval technique, EOM and convertible carbon present in the sample
is determined through S1 and S2 peaks observed during pyrolysis. However for
completing the TOC estimation, the measure of residual carbon is also needed and it is
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
41/130
25
obtained by oxidizing the sample following pyrolysis. The sample is heated in an
oxidation oven so that residual carbon converts to CO2 and then by measuring the
amount of CO2 generated during oxidation, the residual organic carbon can be back
calculated. The residual carbon is then added to the extractable carbon and the
convertible carbon to obtain a full measure of TOC. Fig.2.7 shows the process of
Rock-Eval measurement.
Fig.2.7: Rock-Eval Pyrogram showing three stages during pyrolysis (Modified after Jarvie, 2004); S1 peakrepresents extractable organic matter in the sample in the form of oil and gas that is already been generated, S2peak represents convertible carbon which is capable of transforming into oil and gas upon thermal maturation.The temperature corresponding to this peak represents Tmax which gives the thermal maturity of the sample, S3
peak corresponds with the release of trapped CO2 during cool down following pyrolysis and is used to estimate
OI.
Time
Yield
TimeTime
Yield
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
42/130
26
2.7 Vitrinite reflectance measurement:
Vitrinite reflectance (%Ro) is an optical technique used to gauge the thermal
maturation of the source rock. It provides an indication of the maximum
paleotemperatures seen by the source rock (Jarvie et al., 2007). This is an optical
method in which microscopic examination of kerogen or the entire rock sample is
carried out and the reflectivity of the particle is recorded via a photomultiplier tube.
Since formation of vitrinite indicates thermal maturity of the rock sample, samples
with higher vitrinite reflectance are more thermally mature. Fig.2.8 shows change in
color and vitrinite reflectivity with organic maturation. It also shows typical vitrinite
reflectance values observed in Barnett shale samples in different stages of thermal
maturation.
Fig. 2.8: Change in color of samples having different thermal maturity (%Ro) observed in Barnett shale
samples (Modified after Jarvie, 2004); samples with over 1.0% Ro are considered thermally mature and arelikely to have produced oil and gas in a commercially significant quantity
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
43/130
27
2.8 Geochemical data reported on Barnett shale:
Jarvie (2004), Jarvie et al. (2007), Pollastro et al. (2007), Zhao et al. (2007) report that
Barnett shale is organic rich, kerogen type II, oil prone marine shale with an initial
average TOC content of 5.5-6.4%, hydrogen index of 340-430 mg HC per gm of TOC
with a vitrinite reflectance of 0.44%Ro. Convertible carbon from Barnett shale is
known to generate about 30% gas in oil window (0.6-0.99%Ro). The oil produced,
upon further maturation, undergoes secondary cracking to produce more gas. Present
day Barnett shale is known to be in a wet gas window between 1.1-1.4 %Ro in most
parts.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
44/130
28
2.9 Rock typing techniques:
Gunter et al. (1997) defines rock types as units of rocks deposited under similar
geological condition, undergone similar digenetic processes resulting in unique
porosity-permeability relationships, capillary pressure profile and water saturations for
a given height above free water. Thus rock typing is a technique of classifying
reservoir rocks with similar petrophysical properties into groups so that each group is
characterized by a set of unique petrophysical properties. Rock samples classified
under one rock type tend to have similar storage and flow characteristics, similar
response on a capillary pressure curve and similar relative permeability curves.
Petrophysical properties of rock types identified from core measurement are correlated
with the log response in a cored interval and these correlations along with the log
measurements are then used to predict the petrophysical properties in the uncored
interval of the reservoir.
Some of the commonly used techniques for rock typing in conventional sandstone and
carbonate reservoirs are described below:
2.9.1 Rock Quality Index (RQI) and Flow Zone Indicator (FZI) technique for
rock typing:
Amaefule et al. (1993) introduced a concept of Rock Quality Index (RQI) by
modifying general form of Kozeny-Carman equation. RQI correlated porosity and
permeability as follows:
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
45/130
29
e
kSqrtRQI
0314.0 .....(2.1)
Where, k = absolute permeability of the system in md and e is effective porosity. RQI
is expressed in m.
RQI calculated above is then plotted against on a log-log plot.
Where, is normalized porosity index defined as a ratio of pore volume to grain
volume and calculated as follows:
ee
z
1
..(2.2)
A plot of RQI vs. yields a straight line with unit slope and its intercept when =1
is termed as Flow Zone Indicator (FZI). FZI can also be calculated as follows:
z
RQIFZI
..(2.3)
Rock samples with similar FZI values are observed to fall on one line on a log-log plot
of RQI and . They constitute one rock type. Samples from different rock types have
different FZI values and they are observed to fall on other parallel straight lines. FZI
includes geological features such as texture and mineralogy of distinct pore geometries
since parameters such as surface area, shape factor and tortuosity of flow path go into
its calculation. A clear distinction between clean sand and shale can be obtained
through FZI index calculation as clay rich, poorly sorted, fine grained sedimentary
rocks have a lower FZI value whereas less shaly, coarse grained and well sorted sands
have high FZI value.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
46/130
30
2.9.2 Winlands R35 approach:
Winlands R35 approach is based on mercury injection, air permeability and porosity
measurements on a core sample. Based on the measurements made on a set of 82
sandstone and carbonate samples, Winland developed following correlation:
log864.0log588.0732.0log 35 kR .....(2.4)
Where,
R35 represents pore throat radius (m) corresponding to 35% mercury saturation
during capillary pressure measurement, k is air permeability in md and is porosity
in percent. 35% mercury saturation was chosen because the best correlation, between
the pore throat radius estimated using the equation and measured through the mercury
injection experiment, was observed at this saturation.
Samples with high porosity and permeability have larger R35 values and samples with
lower porosity and permeability have smaller R35 values. Knowing the porosity and
the permeability, one can calculate a corresponding R35 value for every sample and
then plot them on a Winland Plot (A semi-log permeability vs. porosity plot with
standard R35 pore throat lines). Cluster of samples with similar R35 values are grouped
into individual rock types.
2.9.3 Pitmans modification of Winlands approach:
Winland in his approach did not offer justification for using a correlation between
porosity, permeability and pore throat radius at 35% mercury saturation. Pittman
(1992) suggested a modification to Winlands approach by introducing a concept of
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
47/130
31
dominant pore throat radius. He proposed a concept of grouping the rocks based on the
dominant pore throat radius in the samples.
The dominant pore throat radius was estimated by plotting mercury saturation divided
by capillary pressure on y-axis and mercury saturation on x-axis. The apex or
inflection point on this graph represented the dominant pore throat radius as a function
of saturation. Pittman also extended the correlation between porosity, permeability and
pore throat radius to saturations other than 35%. Hence after determining the
saturation at which maximum samples exhibit inflection, an appropriate equation can
be chosen to correlate porosity, permeability with pore throat radius. Samples with
similar pore throat radii are grouped together into one rock type.
2.9.4 Prediction of permeability from Hg injection data:
If the direct measurement of permeability is not available, permeability can be
predicted from Hg injection data. Swanson (1981) and Thomeer (1960, 1983)
proposed a relationship to estimate permeability from Hg injection data.
Thomeer (1960, 1983) observed a correlation between air permeability (k), Hg
displacement pressure (Pd), total connected pore space (Sb) and the shape of the
capillary pressure curve expressed in terms of pore geometric factor (Fg). He proposed
a following equation to correlate them:
23334.1
8068.3
d
b
gP
SFk ....(2.5)
The correlation was developed based on the Hg injection measurements on sandstones
and carbonate samples from different formations. All three parameters required for
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
48/130
32
estimating permeability were obtained by plotting measured values of capillary
pressure (Pc) and percentage pore volume occupied by mercury (Sb) on a log log
scale. The plot is hyperbolic in shape for conventional reservoir rocks.
Swanson (1981) developed his correlation based on the same plot. However, his
correlation uses capillary pressure (Pc) and percentage pore volume (Sb) corresponding
to the inflection point of the hyperbolic plot. He proposed following correlation to
estimate air permeability.
691.1
399
c
b
P
Sk ....(2.6)
These equations predict permeability well as long as the air permeability of the sample
is 10 millidarcy and higher. These equations do not take into account Klinkenberg gas
slippage, hence they do not predict accurately at lower permeability values.
Kamath (1992) has also reported a similar observation. He observes that the accuracy
of permeability estimation declines with the permeability level of the sample. He
reports that for a 95% confidence interval, the permeability estimation ability is within
a factor of 3.3 for high permeability (>10 millidarcy) samples. For samples with
moderate permeability (between 1 to 10 millidarcy), the estimation ability is within a
factor of 5.4 and in the low permeability samples (
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
49/130
33
permeability which is well outside the range of permeability within which these
correlations work. During Hg injection measurements on shale samples, the entire
connected pore space is often not filled up as the pore throats controlling access to
large pore volumes are smaller than what Hg can pass through at 60,000 psi. It means
that the capillary pressure against Hg saturation plot which is used for obtaining the
parameters to be used in Swansons and Thomeers correlation is not always available
in shales. Therefore, permeability prediction using Swansons and Thomeers
approach is not feasible in shale samples.
We observe that all the conventional approaches of rock typing correlate porosity with
permeability measured over the cored interval. Direct measurements of both porosity
and permeability are made on core samples constituting the sample set. If a direct
measurement of permeability through pressure or pulse decay technique is not
available, it can be estimated from Hg injection measurement. The sample set in most
of these correlations is limited to sandstones and carbonates and does not include
shales. The core samples in these sets have a wide dynamic range for porosity and
have air permeabilities in a millidarcy range at least.
However, with nanodarcy matrix permeability, the conventional techniques of
permeability measurement do not work in shales. Since permeability prediction from
Hg injection also does not work, coming up with permeability dataset required for
porosity-permeability correlation is almost impossible. In conventional reservoirs,
there is also a considerable variation in porosity; whereas in shales, porosity has a very
narrow dynamic range. Since both porosity and permeability lack the dynamic range
necessary for rock typing, identifying rock types through conventional techniques in
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
50/130
34
shale gas reservoirs is not possible. Hence instead of using porosity-permeability
cross-plots, we have attempted rock typing using geological core description and
petrophysical measurements other than permeability in Barnett shale play.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
51/130
35
2.10 Rock typing through Principal Component and Cluster analysis:
In an entirely independent exercise, rock typing was attempted on the same dataset
through multi-variable analysis based on Principal Component and Cluster Analysis
techniques. Rock typing was carried out using efacies program developed by Dr. A.
Datta-Gupta from Texas A&M University. Lee et al. (2002) have described this
technique in detail. A summary on techniques behind the working of this program is
provided below:
2.10.1 Principal Component analysis (PCA):
Principal Component analysis (PCA) technique is used for summarizing the data
effectively without losing too much information. PCA technique reduces the
dimensionality of the problem by introducing principal components. Principal
components are identified within the defined variable space. They provide an alternate
coordinate system in multi-dimensional space for displaying data without too much
lose of information. Principal components are constructed through linear combination
of variables. The eigenvectors and covariance matrix provide the coefficients for
principal component transformations.
The total variance of the dataset is the sum of individual variances associated with
each principal component. Hence addition of every principal component increases the
percentage of variance explained. The maximum number of principal components
equals the number of variables and all the principal components together explain
100% variance. Principal components correlate well with the variables in the problem;
e.g. principal component 1 (PC1) may correlate well with porosity and PC2 may show
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
52/130
36
a good correlation with clay percentage. The first few principal components often
explain most of the variance in the dataset and are usually adequate to reveal the
structure of the dataset without too much loss of information. By selecting only the
first few principal components for data analysis, one can reduce the dimensionality of
the problem (Lee et al., 2002). For example, in a seven variable problem, if the first
four principal components explain over 90% variance of the dataset then by selecting
the first four principal components for cluster analysis, the dimensionality of the
problem can be reduced from seven to four. Every principal component is then a
coordinate of the data point in a four dimensional space.
2.10.2 Cluster analysis:
Cluster analysis aims to classify data points into groups that are internally
homogeneous and externally isolated (Lee et al., 2002). The number of clusters to be
identified is specified by the user.
In a rock typing exercise, where input is in the form of petrophysical properties
measured at every depth, a cluster represents a collection of samples with similar
petrophysical properties which are considerably different from the petrophysical
properties of the samples from another cluster.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
53/130
37
Chapter3
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
This section describes the laboratory procedures followed for making petrophysical
measurements in detail.
3.1 Sampling procedure:
Cores recovered from four wells located in different parts of Newark East field were
used in this study. The core recovered is continuous and has a very few missing
intervals. Porosity and mineralogy measurements are made on samples recovered at
every two feet interval. Two foot interval for sampling is selected to ensure fair
representations of all possible mineral compositions and minimize sampling bias
towards certain lithofacies. Due to the time and expense involved in mercury injection
measurements, samples for these measurements are recovered at every ten feet. TOC
measurements are performed on the samples from selected depths. Dataset of
petrophysical measurements used in rock typing has 796 porosity and mineralogy
measurements, 436 TOC measurements and 130 Hg injection results.
Fig. 3.1 shows core images taken at various depths in the interval of study. The extent
of heterogeneity of Barnett shale play is clearly visible in these pictures. We
frequently observe carbonate rich zones (predominantly calcite) and fine interbedding
of calcite and clay in addition to clay rich zones throughout the cored interval. In order
to ensure that the samples, used in the measurements made at one depth, are as
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
54/130
38
homogeneous as possible; we recover a large single piece of a rock at every depth and
break it down into smaller pieces.
Fig. 3.1: Barnett shale core images. (Top left:) 7491.5 ft, well A, sharp boundary between clay rich and calcite
rich zones; (Top right:) 7544.6 ft, well A, clay rich black shale; (Bottom left:) 7595.3 ft, well A, fracturedrock, predominantly calcite; (Bottom right:) 7606.6 ft, well A, inter-bedding of thin streaks of calcite with clay
3.2 Helium porosity, bulk and grain volume measurement:
Porosity measurement is used to measure the void space in the sample. Void volume
of a sample is calculated by subtracting the grain volume of the sample from its bulk
volume. Mathematically, porosity is expressed as follows:
100100
B
GB
B
P
V
VV
V
V (3.1)
Where is the pore volume of the rock sample, is the bulk volume of the sample,
is the grain volume of the sample and is the porosity of the sample. Bulk
7491.5 7544.6
7595.3 7606.6
7491.5 7544.6
7595.3 7606.6
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
55/130
39
volume of the sample is obtained by using mercury immersion technique where the
sample is immersed in a mercury bath and the Hg displacement is recorded as it equals
the bulk volume of the sample from Archimedes Principle.
In order to estimate pore volume of the sample; gas, free water and volatile
hydrocarbon filled pore space must be accounted for. Karastathis (2007) developed a
technique for estimating water and volatile hydrocarbon free effective porosity,
exclusively for shales, at IC3
lab. The brief summary of this methodology is as
follows:
About 10~14 gm of a shale sample is recovered and heated in a oven at 100oC for 12
hours to remove free water present in the sample. After the first heating cycle, the
sample is allowed to cool in a desiccator for 30 minutes before recording its bulk
volume ( ) using a technique already described above. The sample is then crushed
using a crucible and pestle. Based on the particle size distribution measurements, the
mean particle size of the crushed sample averaged over a total of 41 samples from all
four wells is 392 +/- 192 m. Histogram showing variation of mean particle size is
shown in Fig. 3.2.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
56/130
40
Fig.3.2: Histogram showing particle size distribution for a set of 41 crushed samples from all four wells;
mean particle size shows a wide variation from 100 to 800 m. Average mean particle size for the dataset is 392
+/- 192 m.
Sample is handled with extreme care during the process of crushing so that the weight
loss is minimized (
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
57/130
41
and without the sample is used to determine the grain volume ( ) and grain density
( ) of the sample in the cell. Grain volume of the sample is corrected for grains lost
during the process of crushing using following formula:
G
GG
mVV
~..(3.2)
Where, is corrected grain volume and is weight loss during crushing.
Water and volatile hydrocarbon free effective porosity of the sample is then estimated
as follows:
100
~
B
GB
V
VV .....(3.3)
3.3 FTIR mineralogy:
Mineral composition of the samples is obtained by using Fourier Transform Infrared
Spectroscopy (FTIR). Sixteen minerals, typically found in sedimentary rocks, can be
detected and quantified using this technique. These minerals are quartz, calcite,
dolomite, siderite, aragonite, illite, kaolinite, smectite, chlorite, mixed clay, oligoclase
feldspar, orthoclase feldspar, albite, pyrite, apatite and anhydrite. Accuracy of
measurement of FTIR mineralogy technique is comparable with other quantitative
methods of mineralogy measurement such as X-ray diffraction and thin section
analysis. The major advantage of FTIR technique is that it is much faster than other
techniques with the results available in a matter of minutes after initial sample
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
58/130
42
preparation is complete. This enables the use of FTIR technique at the wellsite for
acquiring mineralogy at multiple data points over a large cored interval.
The principle behind FTIR mineralogy technique is as follows: Most of the minerals
constituting sedimentary rocks have covalent bonds between the atoms. These
covalent bonds have resonating frequencies in mid-infrared region (4000 cm-1
to 400
cm-1). The resonant frequencies depend on the bond type and the atoms bonded
together. Naturally, these frequencies are different for different minerals. When a
sample containing these minerals is exposed to radiation from mid-infrared region,
minerals constituting the sample absorb energy at characteristic resonant frequencies.
Part of the energy that is absorbed by the bond is termed as its absorbance and the rest
is termed as transmittance. In FTIR technique, the transmittance at every frequency is
measured then converted into absorbance at that frequency using equation 3.4.
100log 10T
A (3.4)
Where, is the absorbance and is percent transmittance (Griffiths and De Haseth,
1986). Absorbance is then plotted against frequency to generate a FTIR spectrum for
the sample. FTIR spectrum so obtained is then inverted using software developed in
IC3 lab to identify and quantify the minerals present in the sample. The minerals are
quantified in terms of their weight percentages.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
59/130
43
The FTIR measurement technique is discussed in detail by Sondergeld and Rai (1993)
and Ballard (2007). The procedure for measuring mineralogy using FTIR technique is
summarized below:
We start with very small amount of crushed sample (already available from helium
porosity measurement) and grind it further to a point where we are unable to feel any
particles and the sample is as fine as talc powder. After grinding the sample, moisture
and organic carbon present in the sample is removed. This is necessary because both
moisture and organics tend to exhibit very strong peaks in mid-infrared region;
masking the absorption peaks of other minerals. Moisture is removed by heating the
powdered sample at 100oC overnight. Organic matter is then removed by oxidizing the
sample in a low temperature plasma asher. A sample is combusted in presence of
oxygen at a low temperature for 16 hours. Carbon dioxide formed during the oxidation
of organic matter is continuously removed using a vacuum pump. The set up of
plasma asher is shown in Fig. 3.3.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
60/130
44
Fig.3.3: Plasma asher setup. Samples are introduced in a plasma asher using a porcelain boat. The machine ishooked up to oxygen cylinder that introduces oxygen into the oxidation chamber. Here the samples are oxidizedat a low temperature for a period of sixteen hours. CO2 produced during oxidation of the sample is continuously
removed by using a vacuum pump. The change in the color of the sample from black to gray indicates that theoxidation process is complete.
After removing the organic matter, a small amount (0.0005 gm) of powdered sample is
mixed with 0.3 gm of potassium bromide (KBr) and pressed under 10 ton pressure in a
die to form a semi-transparent disc. The disc is placed in a sample holder and run in
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR) to acquire the spectrum. Mineralogy
of a sample is then obtained through an inversion of this spectrum.
3.4 Mercury injection capillary pressure measurement:
Mercury injection capillary pressure measurement estimates pore throat distribution in
a sample and also measures the connected pore space. In conventional reservoir rock,
this measurement can be used to measure effective porosity and estimate permeability
of the sample.
Oxidation Chamber
Oxidation Chamber
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
61/130
45
The experiment is conducted on 8-10 gm chip by introducing mercury under pressure.
The pressure is increased from the entry pressure (set at 5 psi) to 60,000 psi at
predefined pressure steps. The pressure table is set in such a manner that the pressure
points are evenly spaced on a logarithmic scale. There are a total of 197 pressure
points. At each pressure point, the pressure is held constant to allow mercury to
intrude into the pore space. The system waits till a pressure equilibrium (stable over 60
second period) is reached to ensure that the mercury intrusion at that pressure step is
indeed complete. The intrusion volume at each pressure step is recorded. After
reaching 60,000 psi pressure, pressure is reduced stepwise down to 19 psi and
extrusion volume at each pressure step is recorded. The number of steps during
extrusion are fewer than intrusion as it takes longer for pressure to equilibrate during
extrusion.
Since pore throats control access to the pore space, mercury first fills up the pore
space it can access through the largest pore throats. Mercury then passes through
smaller and smaller pore throats as pressure increases and eventually fills up the entire
connected pore space. At 60,000 psi pressure, mercury can enter pore throats as small
as 3 nanometers in diameter.
In shales, pore throats that control access to most of the pore space are very small.
Most of the intrusion in shale samples is typically seen at pressures above 10,000 psi.
This corresponds to a pore throat diameter of 18 nanometers and matrix permeabilities
of few tens of nano-darcies (Sigal, 2007).
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
62/130
46
Mercury injection capillary pressure measurement is based on Washburns equation:
R
CosP RockHgc1
.(3.5)
Where, = Capillary pressure, = Interfacial tension of mercury, =
Contact angle between Hg and rock sample, = Pore threat radius
Since the interfacial tension of mercury (480 dyne/cm) and contact angle (140o)
between mercury and rock sample is already known, knowing the pressure at which
the mercury passes through the pore throats; the pore throat radius can be estimated.
In addition to obtaining pore throat distribution, the data obtained during intrusion and
extrusion cycle are also used for plotting incremental and cumulative Hg intrusion
curves. An incremental intrusion curve is obtained by plotting incremental Hg
intrusion as a function of pressure. Cumulative intrusion for a pressure point is
estimated by summing incremental intrusion at all pressure points less than and equal
to that pressure point. These data when plotted against pressure gives a cumulative
mercury intrusion curve. Incremental intrusion curves are typically made by including
data obtained during intrusion cycle only. Cumulative intrusion curves are made by
including the data points from intrusion as well as from extrusion cycle. The shapes of
the incremental and cumulative mercury intrusion curves are often unique for different
rock types; hence these curves can be very useful during rock typing. A cumulative Hg
intrusion plot is used to verify if the observed intrusion into the sample is real.
Whenever the mercury intrusion into the sample is real, hysteresis between saturating
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
63/130
47
and desaturating curves is observed (see Fig. 3.4, left). This is because not all the
mercury that enters the pore space comes out when the pressure is released. Lack of
hysteresis on a cumulative intrusion plot is an indication that the intrusion is not real
(see Fig. 3.4, right).
Fig.3.4: Cumulative Hg intrusion plots showing real and false intrusion; (left): There is a considerable
hysteresis between the saturating and the desaturating curve. Some of the Hg that went into the pore space
during the intrusion cycle remained inside even after the pressure was released. It means that the Hg intrusion
in a sample is real, (right): Lack of hysteresis between the saturating and the desaturating curve indicates false
intrusion.
Before running a Hg injection experiment, a sample is first dried to remove any free
water present in the pore space. The heating is carried out 12 hours at 100oC
temperature. After cooling to room temperature in a desiccator over 30 minutes, the
sample is placed in a penetrometer. Penetrometer is a glass apparatus used in this
experiment. It is sealed using a cap, plastic o-ring and apiezon grease. Sealed
penetrometer is introduced in a low pressure section of AutoPore IV machine. After
evacuating the low pressure chamber down to 200 mm of Hg column, pressure is held
at that level to remove any remaining moisture and air from the sample and the
penetrometer system. Mercury is introduced into the penetrometer at 5 psi through its
stem. Hg fills up the stem and the remaining volume in the penetrometer bulb as it
Normalized Cumulative Hg Intrusion Curve -
Real Intrusion
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Pressure, psi
NormalizedCumulativeHg
Intrusion
Normalized Cumulative Hg Injection Curve - False
Intrusion
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Pressure, psi
NormalizedCumulativeHg
Intrusion
Saturating Curve
Desaturating Curve
Desaturating Curve
Saturating Curve
Normalized Cumulative Hg Intrusion Curve -
Real Intrusion
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Pressure, psi
NormalizedCumulativeHg
Intrusion
Normalized Cumulative Hg Injection Curve - False
Intrusion
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000
Pressure, psi
NormalizedCumulativeHg
Intrusion
Saturating Curve
Desaturating Curve
Desaturating Curve
Saturating Curve
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
64/130
48
completely surrounds the sample. Mercury is pressurized from outside using nitrogen
in a low pressure section of AutoPore IV machine. As Hg is pressurized from
outside, it applies equivalent hydrostatic pressure on the sample and begins intruding
into the pore space. Pressure is raised stepwise up to 25 psi in a low pressure section
and then up to 60,000 psi after transferring the penetrometer into high pressure
section. Mineral oil is used in a high pressure section for applying pressure.
Penetrometer stem is made up of glass and has metallic coating from outside. Since
mercury and metal coating are conductors and glass is an insulator, a penetrometer
filled with mercury acts like a capacitor whose capacitance changes with the receding
level of mercury in the penetrometer stem. Thus the amount of Hg intrusion is
recorded by measuring the change in capacitance of the penetrometer stem at every
pressure step.
Penetrometers come in different stem volumes. Depending on the pore space inside
the sample, a penetrometer with an appropriate stem volume can be selected. Since
shale samples have a very low connected porosity, penetrometers with the least stem
volume (0.366 cc) are selected. These penetrometers are called type-I penetrometers,
with the minimum and maximum measurable volume of 0.0784 cc and 0.3136 cc,
respectively.
Fig. 3.5 shows penetrometer assembly in detail and Fig. 3.6 shows AutoPore IV
machine used for running Hg injection measurements.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
65/130
49
Fig.3.5: Penetrometer along with its components; after placing the sample in a penetrometer bulb,
penetrometer is tightly sealed using a metallic cap, plastic o-ring and apiezon grease. Penetrometer is thenintroduced into the low pressure section of AutoPore IV machine for running the experiment.
Cap Components
Stem
Bulb
Cap Components
Stem
Bulb
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
66/130
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
67/130
51
found for shale samples, hence the mercury injection curves for the shale samples are
not corrected for the blank effect.
Conformance error occurs when mercury entering the penetrometer does not fill up the
empty space inside the penetrometer completely. This is typically observed in samples
with an irregular shape and/or a rough surface. Since mercury does not conform to the
sample at the filling pressure, it starts to fill up the remaining void space around the
sample as the pressure is raised during the experiment. This results into reduction of
Hg filled volume of a penetrometer stem and gets recorded as mercury intrusion into
the sample. Depending on the aperture size of these surface irregularities, the
conformance error may or may not be significant. If the surface irregularities have
large apertures that Hg can fill up at lower pressures then conformance error is not
likely to be significant. This is because the conformance error will not influence the
shape of the capillary pressure curve as most of the Hg intrusion in shales occurs only
after 10,000 psi pressure. However, conformance error may be significant incase the
aperture size of the surface irregularities is small enough that Hg conforms to the
sample beyond 10,000 psi pressure. Sigal (2009) has discussed both these errors in
detail.
3.5 Total organic carbon (TOC) measurement:
Total organic carbon (TOC) measures the organic matter present in shale. Shales
samples with higher TOC content are richer in terms of organics and possess higher
hydrocarbon generation potential. Along with the TOC content, the thermal maturity
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
68/130
52
of shale samples is equally important. It indicates the extent of transformation of the
organic matter into oil and gas. TOC and thermal maturity measurements on Barnett
shale samples are carried out by a commercial lab.
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
69/130
53
Chapter4
OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS
Helium porosity and FTIR mineralogy measurements were carried out on 796 core
plugs recovered from four wells from different parts of Newark East field. The results
obtained from these measurements are summarized and discussed in this chapter.
4.1 Helium porosity:
Water free effective porosity, measured using a technique developed by Karastathis
(2007), yielded average helium porosity of 5.7% for 796 samples. As shown in Fig.
4.1, helium porosity of these samples exhibits a very wide range (2-10 %). The
accuracy of these measurements is +/-0.5 % and the standard deviation is 2.1 %.
Fig.4.1: Porosity histogram for 796 samples from 4 different wells;porosity measurement on the entire sample
set shows a wide variation (210%). Average porosity for the dataset is 5.7 +/- 2.1%.
Porosity Histogram - All Four Wells
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 More
Porosity (%)
No.ofSamples
Total no. of samples = 796
Average Porosity = 5.7+/- 2.1%
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
70/130
54
4.2 FTIR mineralogy:
FTIR mineralogy technique was used to determine the mineral composition of the
sample set. Sixteen minerals typically found in the sedimentary rocks were identified
as well as quantified using this technique. Mineralogy of the samples exhibited
considerable variation with depth in all the four wells (Refer Fig. 4.2).
Fig.4.2: Bar charts showing mineral variation for all four wells; mineral composition with depth for bothupper (UB) and lower Barnett (LB) is shown for wells A, B and C is shown. Forestburg interval that
separates UB and LB has disappeared in well D; hence Barnett in this well is continuous without any
distinction as UB and LB. 1. UB seems to be richer in carbonate and leaner in clays where as it is other way
-
7/31/2019 Sagar Kale Shalegasthesis
71/130
55
around in LB in wells A, B and C 2. Apart from carbonate rich intervals, quartz content stays fairlyuniform throughout in wells A, B and C whereas in well D it is observed to decrease with depth. 3. Clay
content increases with depth in well D.
We know that calcite rich Forestburg interval separates Barnett shale into two parts.
The upper part (also known as Upper Barnett) seems richer in carbonates than the
lower part (also known as Lower Barnett) in well A, well B and well C.
Carbonate content in well A is fairly uniform throughout lower Barnett with
occasional carbonate rich streak but in lower Barnett of well B carbonate content is
observed to be highly variable with both thick and thin carbonate intervals occurring
intermittently. Well C exhibits a stark contrast in the carbonate content of the upper
and the lower Barnett with the carbonate content of upper Barnett being significantly
higher than that of the lower Barnett. Wells A, B and C have higher clay content
in the lower Barnett t