rutgers symposium on lunar settlements 3-8 june 2007 rutgers university
DESCRIPTION
RUTGERS SYMPOSIUM ON LUNAR SETTLEMENTS 3-8 JUNE 2007 RUTGERS UNIVERSITY. Surface Infrastructure Planning and Design Considerations for Future Lunar and Mars Habitation. Heavy Lift Vehicles (HLVs) with capabilities to launch payloads approaching 100MT and 7 meter diameter - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
RUTGERS SYMPOSIUM ON LUNAR SETTLEMENTS 3-8 JUNE 2007 RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
Surface Infrastructure Planning and Design Considerations for Future Lunar and Mars Habitation
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Launch Systems
• Heavy Lift Vehicles (HLVs) with capabilities to launch payloads approaching 100MT and 7 meter diameter
• Approaches that utilize Medium Lift Vehicles (MLVs) with capacities ranging from about 15MT to somewhat less than 100MT
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Lander Considerations
Typical Lander Concept SICSA Lander Concept
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Module Options
1. Conventional module2. Telescopic module3. Vertical module with a
spherical inflatable section
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Vertical Module Configurations• A triangular pattern scheme affords
certain advantages and disadvantages:Pros: A relatively compact configuration
footprint at the entry airlock level can minimize the area for site surface preparation if required.Loop egress is achieved with three modules.
Con: May be more difficult to position/ assemble.
• A rectilinear scheme also offers advantages/ disadvantages:
Pros: Greater spacing between berthing locations affords more useful wall/ equipment space.
Con: Larger footprint for good site selection and/ or surface preparation. 4 modules are needed for loop egress.
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Combination Configurations• The triangular scheme offers
advantages and disadvantages:Pros: A very compact footprint around the
inflatable module support bases to minimize site surface preparation requirements. Loop egress is achieved with 3 inflatable modules.
Con: May be more difficult to assemble.• The cruciform scheme also offers
advantages and disadvantages:Pros: The deployment footprint around the
horizontal module is quite small, limiting site preparation.The scheme can begin as a cruciform and evolve into a closed-loop plan.
Con: Dual egress is not achieved until 4 modules are in place.
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Configuration ComparisonsSpace/Launch Efficiency
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Configuration ComparisonsEmergency Egress
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Configuration ComparisonsModule Commonality
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Configuration ComparisonsEvolutionary Growth
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Configuration ComparisonsSurface Positioning
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Inflatable Upper Level Plan
• Sleeping/Private1. Partitions2. Bed and storage3. Table4. Chair5. Shelves6. Privacy curtains
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Sleeping/Private Accommodations
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Inflatable Second Level Plan
• Labs and Crew Workstations
– Glovebox– Sample Photography– Lab’s Workstation– Experiment Tanks– Sink/Refrigerator/
Freezer– Fabric Storage
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Inflatable Lower Level Plan
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Common Areas
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Exercise/Medical Area
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Exercise and Common Area
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX
Site Development Considerations
1. Orbital satellite imaging and unmanned precursor surface surveys should be undertaken to determine safe landing locations with appropriate terrain characteristics for base development.• Robotic surface investigation and mapping rovers can determine
optimized routings between landing and operational locations and deploy beacons.
• Automated survey/mapping rovers can later work in conjunction with rovers used for power cable deployment and cargo/human transport.
2. Landing sites must be located at sufficient distances from habitats and other sensitive areas. • Use of tethered landers can greatly reduce or avoid projectile hazards.• RTGs or other power systems that produce radiation safety hazards
must be located at a safe distance away from habitable facilities..
Larry Bell, Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture (SICSA)Gerald D. Hines College of Architecture, University of Houston, Houston TX